Menachem Shmei

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 651 through 700 (of 844 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Three Differences #2180026
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    takahmamash,

    This is indeed a deeply profound question. Thanks for giving me some food for thought (no pun intended).

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2180025
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    I completely agree with AAQ.

    This is exactly my point. Couldn’t have said it better. Just check out the countless threads going in circles.

    Gadolhadofi, what exactly will be the outcome of me stating “Yes” or “No” without explaining what I mean by that and why I say that? I don’t think it will help you understand me any better. What, then, is the point?

    in reply to: The Three Differences #2179798
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Another difference (from the Lubavitcher Rebbe):

    חמץ and מצה both share the same letters, aside from the ה and ח

    When someone is haughty (חמץ), he can’t do teshuva because he always blames any wrongdoings on others and he never feels guilty.
    The ח only has an opening on the bottom – the only path such a person will go is downward ר”ל.

    When someone is humble (מצה), he can always do teshuva, for he is quick to recognize his wrongdoings.
    This is symbolized by the ה which has an opening on top to get out of our wrongs and get closer to Hashem.

    This Pesach, let’s try to be matzos. Lowering our ישות will give us an opening to the greatest heights.

    (לקוטי שיחות ח”א ע’ 129 ואילך)

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2179777
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Gadol,

    I will happily follow whomever Hashem appoints to be Melech Hamoshiach, and of course, I will join the rest of Klal Yisroel in accepting him as king.

    Regarding whom specifically Hashem will appoint:
    I do have a belief of whom Hashem will appoint to be Moshiach according to my understanding of Torah in general, and more specifically Toras Hachassidus. This understanding was also confirmed to me by my Torah teachers and by my rebbe.
    Therefore, in my mind this is as definite as the rest of the details and halachos in Torah. This does not mean I don’t respect those who disagree. I respect Shamai even though my teachers taught me that Hashem definitely wants me to increase in Chanukah candles every night.

    I wouldn’t mind going into the specifics of what I understand and where I learn it from if I were talking to someone in person and we were both in a true state of being able to hear and understand each other’s viewpoint.

    However, it would be naïve for me to think that this could be settled on an anonymous online forum (especially when there is a several-hour wait time between each response 😀), as is evident from the COUNTLESS threads repeating the same rhetoric on these topics.

    מחלוקת לשם שמים סופה להתקיים

    To clarify: I understand that I didn’t answer your question. However, I am not beating around the bush. I’m explaining why my answer would be pointless as we wouldn’t understand each other anyway and would just go in circles.

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2179477
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    >But i hope we can agree that bakashos . . . are tefilos which are only for Hashem or for tzadikim to bring to Hashem.”

    I definitely agree.

    >many in your community believe that the lubavitcher rebbe is capable of fulfilling an individual’s bakashos.

    I don’t know any Lubavitchers who believe that. No one says that the Rebbe has his own kochos so we don’t need Hashem’s koach (chas v’shalom chas v’shalom. I have never heard such a thing in my life, aside from non Lubavitchers telling me that this is chas v’shalom the opinion of Lubavitchers היל”ת עפ”ל).
    Everyone I know believes that we go to a tzaddik (in this case the Rebbe) to channel HASHEM’s brochos, because a tzaddik has a more direct line (as is explained in many places. There is also an interesting Chasam Sofer that explains the difference in this regard between a tzaddik and a malach (whom it is problematic to ask brochos from).

    Anyone who learns chassidus will tell you that the very meaning of beracha is hamshacha (המבריך את הגפן). We go to a tzaddik to draw down the Hashem’s brochos which already exist limaala.

    When a Lubavitcher says “I did this with the Rebbe’s kochos” and people jump and him and scream “avoda zorah” – I think it comes from ignorance and suspicion of Yidden who are different.
    It is the same as someone saying “I made a great deal for 10,000 dollars yesterday” – no one says that the businessman doesn’t believe in Hashem ch”v, rather they understand that he means that he made a KELI for Hashem’s brochos of $10,000.

    If your mindset is set that a group of people have a certain wrong belief, it can be very easy to misinterpret everything they say to fit your conception of them.

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2179404
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    >ths ONLY thing you find chazal advocating is asking for the niftar to daven on your behalf.

    Avira, when I mentioned the poskim I clearly wrote “to intercede on their behalf” – because that is what most of the poskim whom I mentioned discuss.

    However, when I mentioned chazal, I intentionally wrote “various requests” because if you go through those gemaras you’ll see that they did NOT only advocate for the niftar to daven on your behalf, rather they came to ask various other things from the dead (either seeking information (such as with Abaye in Brachos), or for the niftar to move his body (such as with Moshe and Yosef in סוטה יג), or to ask questions in learning, etc.)
    The Rama clearly rules (יו”ד סי’ קעט סי”ד) that one is allowed to ask the neshama of a deceased person to swear that it will come to him and answer his questions.

    This is what I meant by “various requests,” and I stand by what I wrote.

    in reply to: Eating Gebroks on Pesach #2179039
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Beautiful Gebroks story:

    Lubavitch is EXTREMELY makpid on gebroks (aside from Acharon shel Pesach). Even children must eat their matzah in plastic bags, lest a crumb fall on the table. Many Lubavitchers remove all matzah from the table before bringing out the next courses. The Rebbe Rashab wouldn’t eat with a fork on Pesach, lest a matzah crumb remain stuck and become gebroks.

    Once, by a Pesach seuda of the Frierdiker Rebbe (Rayatz), an uninformed guest began dipping his matzah in borscht. The chassidim were shocked and a commotion ensued.

    The Frierdiker Rebbe commented: “It is better that the matzah become red (from borscht) than a Yid’s face redden in shame!”

    in reply to: Erez Yisrael or stay in Galut? #2178890
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    One of the main accomplishments of Melech Hamoshiach is “מקבץ נדחי ישראל” – to return all of the Yidden to Eretz Yisroel (after he builds the Beis Hamikdash).
    There are many mitzvos that are dependent on all Yidden being in Eretz Yisroel (כל ישראל יושבים על אדמתם) and we have to wait till Moshiach comes to fulfill them.
    ראה רמב”ם הלכות מלך המשיח רפי”א

    Rashi tells us (נצבים ל, ג): Kibbutz Goliyos will be tough, but Hashem will כביכול grap each Yid by the hand and shlep them back to Eretz Yisroel.

    May this happen speedily in our days!
    בניסן נגאלו ובניסן עתידין ליגאל

    (P.S. Last Sukkos, all Yidden living in Eretz Yisroel said in musaf “מפני חטאנו גלינו מארצינו”… vidal)

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2178887
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Reb Eliezer, you quoted the Mishna Brurah. However, this is actually a great machlokes haposkim, with MANY poskim clearly ruling that one is allowed to ask deceased tzadikim (their neshamos) to intercede on their behalf.

    For example:
    חמדת ימים, פחד יצחק, פרי מגדים, מנחת יצחק, בצל החכמה, חוות יאיר, מנחת אלעזר, יראים, ועוד ועוד

    These poskim explain clearly why this is not דורש אל המתים.

    The poskim who don’t allow it have many מאמרי חז”ל to answer, where it clearly mentions תנאים ואמוראים (and Kalev) who went to קברים and spoke to the מת with various requests.
    סוטה לד, ב. פסיקתא רבתי ג. ברכות יח,ב. חגיגה כב, ב. ועוד ועוד
    And of course the Zohar.

    Everyone should follow their minhag and their rov.

    in reply to: I don’t like Donald Trump, but… #2174875
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    TRUMP: I WILL BE ARRESTED ON TUESDAY – WE MUST SAVE AMERICA! PROTEST, PROTEST, PROTEST!!!

    I think this emphasizes my point in the original post.

    I dislike Trump now even more than before. I personally think he is a lunatic who should not lead this country.

    However, I think the justice system system should leave it up to us to decide that. The amount of random allegations that Trump is accused with on a daily basis points in one direction: the Dems are using every tool at their disposal to shut down Trump.

    This leads me to the question I asked in the beginning:
    If they are so sure that Trump is obviously unfit to lead, why the need for such crooked ways to accomplish their goals?
    Don’t they trust the American citizens to elect the right person?

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2173674
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    If the commenters here want to know the true opinions and answers of Lubavitch – talk to a real life Lubavitcher with brains (there are many such).

    If you want to know the opinion of internet posters on Lubavitch – check out the dozens of threads on YWN about Lubavitch (אין חדש תחת השמש).

    If you’re feeling pained that 3 weeks have gone by already without arguing about Lubavitch – go ahead, continue rehashing all the nonsense. אין לדבר סוף

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2172461
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    >Ever see a lubavitcher who first finds out that many gedolim didn’t hold of the rebbe? It gives them a crisis of faith and many go off the derech because of it.

    From the inside I can tell you that this statement is completely baseless and ridiculous on so many levels.

    (Not saying that Lubavitchers don’t go off the derech. Unfortunately, they are afflicted with similar pandemics to the rest of Klal Yisroel. However, the reason you gave is way off the mark. Anyone who knows anything about Lubavitch from the inside can attest to this.

    Unless your basis is books or articles written by those who left the fold. I hope you don’t believe everything you read about orthodoxy by those who left).

    in reply to: Was Albert Einstein a Baal Teshuvah? #2171988
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Dear n0mesora,

    Why would you make up a pshat in Gemara that goes against how way all the rishonim and achronim learn it (I checked) just in order to take away the possibility for a Yid to have done Teshuva?

    (Also, if what you’re saying is true, why does someone have to have הרהור עבודה זרה to be considered a רשע? Maybe even without it he considers himself a רשע, as the Gemara says in Niddah היה בעיניך כרשע?)

    Please point out which Tosfos you are referring to. Couldn’t find it.

    in reply to: Was Albert Einstein a Baal Teshuvah? #2171000
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    >Was Albert Einstein a Baal Teshuvah?

    Hopefully before he passed away he had a hirhur Teshuva, in which case he is considered a tzaddik gomur as per Gemara Kiddushin (נעשה צדיק גמור).
    Another source: יש שקונה עולמו בשעה אחת

    in reply to: Bein Hametzarim Trivia Question #2170998
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Good,

    Well we learn the extra happiness of Adar from the 3 weeks:
    כשם שמשנכנס אב ממעטין בשמחה, כך משנכנס אדר מרבים בשמחה

    Chasidus explains the reason why the Gemara compares them is because our goal is to transform the sadness of golus (Av) into the joy of Geulah v’yeshuah (Adar).

    (Though, honestly, I have no idea why ujm bumped this thread)

    in reply to: Shalach Manos – Is Bourbon a food? #2170999
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Square,

    To the best of my knowledge, those quotes generally were not speaking about Purim

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2170918
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    It would be interesting if someone would go through the thousands of posts about Lubavitch from the CR and put together a comprehensive book on the subject. Maybe several volumes.

    Maybe we can use chatGPT or some other AI software to put this together.

    It would be especially appropriate if it could be printed in honor of Purim!

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2170767
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Impressive! This thread managed to last for SIX DAYS without mentioning the elephant in the room (aside from a lone comment by RSo). B”H, we are apparently more b’achdus then ever before.

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2169760
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    >Heretical thinking. Hashem has no use for candidates.

    Join the long list of “heretics” (r”l):
    The yeshivos of Rav Shilo, Rav Yanai, Rav Nachman, etc. (Sanhedrin 98b).
    The Sdei Chemed (“בדרך הזה היה משוער אצלם בכל דור מיהו”).
    Rav Shachnah, the Ramah’s teacher. The Ohr Hachayim.
    And many more.

    in reply to: Shtultz #2169685
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Not sure what the OP means by shtultz, but if it means being proud of our Yiddishkeit and observing the Torah (the translation of the Yiddish “shtultz”) – this is one of the important idea, especially in America, of Geon Yaakov.

    It’s known that one of the greatest nisyonos of our post holocaust America is obeying the first seif of shulchan aruch:
    אל יבוש מפני המעליגים

    This is obviously not the idea of gaava which means being proud of YOURSELF, rather being proud of the Torah that we represent.

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2169686
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Gadolhadorah,

    You missed the fact that the Donald doesn’t check his suits for shatnez. That should disqualify him as well according to the Rambam (“עוסק המצוות כדוד אביו”).

    in reply to: Techiyas Hameisim By 5786/5790 #2169572
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    >How do we know what Hashem’s plans are

    Well, how do we know about Techiyas Hameisim all together? Because He told us in His Torah. The same Zohar that says that תחה”מ is 40 years after kibbutz goliyos told us that the Beis Hamikdash must be built beforehand.

    Kibbutz goliyos is a distinctly Jewish concept, Jewish meaning Torah. Kibbutz goliyos does not mean thousands of Jewish children being brought to Eretz Yisroel to have their “simanim” chopped off, nor thousands of Russians pouring into the land without checking who is Jewish – thus mixing thousands of goyim into Klal Yisroel r”l.

    The Beis Hamikdash is a physical building on har habayis where Yidden come to serve Hashem. Not a Muslim mosque l’havdil, and not a Knesset filled with Jews who are embarrassed by the Torah.

    Hashem informed us all of this in His holy books. Go learn them.

    in reply to: Techiyas Hameisim By 5786/5790 #2169322
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    The OP seems to have forgotten what the Zohar writes:

    The Beis Hamikdash is built BEFORE kibbutz goliyos, and kibbutz goliyos is before Techiyas Hameisim.

    I believe that we are on the threshold of Geula, but not because 40 years ago some Jews built a secular state in our holy land. This is not my Beis Hamikdash. This is not my kibbutz goliyos.

    in reply to: Aliens/UFO/Extraterrestrial Beings #2167602
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Avira,
    Indeed, I completely agree with you.

    ujm,
    Bacteria. Unless you don’t consider that a creature. Whatever. (No, I did not mean “dinosaurs” if that’s what you’re asking).

    in reply to: Aliens/UFO/Extraterrestrial Beings #2167497
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    AviraDeArah,

    Just wondering, aren’t there plenty of creatures and other beings that we weren’t aware of for thousands of years and we’re only revealed recently?

    On the contrary, Hashem chose this time to reveal their existence so we can serve Hashem on much greater level with all the new tools (think electricity, radio waves, etc.).

    in reply to: Aliens/UFO/Extraterrestrial Beings #2165841
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Chabad dot org has a nice article on this with many מראי מקומות

    Google: Chabad org is there life on other planets

    For another interesting article on this topic, Google:
    The Rebbe and the scientist: Looking for life on Mars

    in reply to: Melech HaMashiach #2165793
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Square,

    Sorry, wasn’t intentional

    in reply to: Melech HaMashiach #2165429
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Square,

    “Any Jew can claim to be Melech HaMoshiach”

    There are certain qualifications listed in the Rambam that someone must have in order to be considered Moshiach even before starting the actual Geulah. There are other signs he must show to prove that he is definitely Moshiach and the Geulah has begun. Having a son is not listed among either list.

    in reply to: Melech HaMashiach #2165353
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    I would like to point out that most commentaries argue with the Rambam’s opinion here, and in very sharp ways.

    This all follows his opinion that תכלית השכר is a spiritual world and Moshiach will not live forever.

    Most disagree with that approach.
    See the Raavad.
    The Ramban (יגזור הרב ז”ל מיתה על המשיח ועל דורו)
    Avodas Hakodesh: הרמב”ם ז”ל שפט משפט מוות על בני תחיית המתים ועל המשיח ודורו
    And many others.

    Additionally, when Moshiach comes, all מומים and sicknesses will be healed (as ruled by the Rambam as well, הלכות תשובה פ”ט), so I doubt anyone will still be childless. (See also Shabbos 30b)

    Irregardless, throughout the signs that the Rambam gives to identify someone as Melech haMoshiach (הלכות מלכים פי”א ה”ד), he makes no mention of having children.

    in reply to: Release of Flatbush “Kidnapper” #2160782
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Gadolhadorah,

    You obviously didn’t watch the video, instead you are believing the fictional story told by NYP, CBS, Arutz Sheva, etc. (which, to the best of my knowledge, they STILL haven’t retracted).

    The avraich did NOT grab his hand and steer him to the door. He spoke to him, explained him the problem, put his hand lightly on his shoulder, headed in the general direction of the door, left the child there and calmly exited the shul, kissing the mezuzah on his way out.

    No grabbing hands, no shlepping, no running.

    Most of the news story was fabricated. Check out the footage.

    in reply to: The apple logo #2157795
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Regarding the fruit of the עץ הדעת, if I’m not mistaken, the opinions are:

    Wheat
    Grapes
    Figs
    Nuts
    Esrogim

    P.S. Esrog can also be called תפוח

    in reply to: Is the Torah against venting? #2152020
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Not getting into the lashon harah aspect, Torah definitely believes in pouring out your feelings to someone else:
    דאגה בלב איש ישיחנה.

    However, Torah always stresses the terrible effects of כעס, so the “venting” should obviously be done in a calm and collected way, with the intent to fix the problem.

    in reply to: Does Hashem Want Us to Survive? #2143156
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Of course Hashem wants the Yidden to survive! Hashem loves the Yidden like the apple of His eye. The entire world and everything in it was created for the Yidden. Yidden are even more important to Hashem than the Torah itself (תנא דבי אליהו, ועוד)

    As we say in the Haggadah, in every generation they rise against us to annihilate us, but Hashem delivers us from their hands.

    Very soon, Moshiach will come, and we’ll live forever with eternal peace. רמב”ם הלכות מלכים פי”ב, ועוד

    in reply to: world Safety #2134138
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Lilmod,

    How optimistic, Eretz Yisroel is the best place to live because it’s the best place to get killed! (ר”ל)

    OP,

    A fundamental tenent of our belief system is אחכה לו בכל יום שיבוא. No matter how bleak things look, let’s remember that we’re on the threshold to a much better world.

    As the Rambam describes (הלכות מלכים ומלחמות ומלך המשיח פי”ב ה”ה):
    At that time [of Melech haMoshiach], there will be no famine nor war, no jealousy nor competition, and all delicacies will be found like dust… And the world will be filled with the knowledge of Hashem as the water covers the seabed.

    in reply to: Game Room In Yeshiva #2134089
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Indeed, this is becoming quite common. Bochurim need a healthy outlet since they are in yeshivah and not using social media, going out to entertainment, etc. (boruch Hashem).

    These are obviously only meant to be used during breaks bein hasdorim, so the more studious bochurim can stay and learn, while the more restless bochurim can play.

    This is especially useful in the winter when it’s hard to play outside, since most yeshiva lack an indoor gym (game room is a cheaper alternative).

    in reply to: Is every Yid a big tzaddik? #2134060
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Akuperma,

    Your suggestion is against Torah.
    Who gave you the right to throw away millions of Hashem’s children, when the Gemara tells us אע”פ שחטא ישראל הוא, and בין כך ובין כך בני הם (which is even referring to a Yid who is משומד לעבודה זרה ר”ל – Rashba Shu”t 1:194)?

    How much more so when we are talking about a person who knows nothing about his own religion (due to lack of education), all he knows is that his nation is the most persecuted in the entire world, yet he show great mesiras nefesh by identifying himself as Jewish, despite not knowing what it means practically.

    In a way, the essential connection that we all have to Hashem is even more visible on such a person than a frum Yid who received a Jewish education.

    in reply to: Is every Yid a big tzaddik? #2134023
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Akuperma,

    Anyone born of a Jewish mother or who did halachic conversion has an intrinsic connection to Hashem, infinitely more than any other creature on Earth.

    This person is defined as Yid. The term has nothing to do with one’s behavior.

    in reply to: Is every Yid a big tzaddik? #2133839
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Shimon,

    As I said, there are several definitions of the term tzaddik, depending on the context.

    The definition that you gave is the one that is brought in Tanya and proven from many mamorei razal.
    However, the Alter Rebbe (Baal Hatanya) himself acknowledges that the term is sometimes used with other meanings (like in the Rambam quoted by smerel, or והצדיקו את הצדיק, etc.).

    Re Morahs (I reply with a grain of sensitivity just in case you are suffering trauma from your kindergarten morah):

    Don’t be so quick to condemn. Remember the תשובת הרשב”א (brought in שו”ת השיב משה סימן יג):
    אין לדחות קבלה שיש ביד הנשים הזקנות מבני עמנו מפני שישים ריבוא מופתים המראים סתרו

    in reply to: Is every Yid a big tzaddik? #2133691
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Avira,

    I know about the limmud of עושה מעשה עמך, I was saying that we don’t find this limmud regarding ועמך כולם צדיקים. On the contrary, it is coming to include this who are not generally עושה מעשה עמך.

    Re Judgemental

    Unfortunately, our behavior often doesn’t reflect on our views. I think that it’s terrible and ossur to speak lashon harah, yet I often slip up.

    Although someone could believe in being non-judgemental and only see another for his pintele Yid, practically when someone bothers him personally he can react terribly.
    Making our day to day life in sync with our belief system is the life struggle of every Yid.

    in reply to: Is every Yid a big tzaddik? #2133530
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    “They have to be “ameich”, oseh maysoh amcha, perfoming what your nation performs. Reshoim aren’t part of that”

    What is your source?

    The Mishna & Gemara (סנהדרין צ, א) learns from the possuk “ועמך כולם צדיקים” that all Yidden have a share in Olam Habba.
    The מפרשים explain this to be referring to ALL Yidden, including רשעים who are חייב ד’ מיתות ב”ד.
    (See Rashi, Maharsha, etc.)

    This is also the halachic ruling of the Rambam (Teshuva, 3:5): Also רשעים have a share in Olam Habba, as it says, ועמך כולם צדיקים
    וכן כל הרשעים שעונותיהן מרבים דנין אותן כפי חטאיהם ויש להן חלק לעולם הבא, שכל ישראל יש להם חלק לעולם הבא אף על פי שחטאו, שנאמר ועמך כלם צדיקים לעולם יירשו ארץ.

    There are many different levels of when the term tzaddik is used, depending on the context.

    Chassidus explains that in this context צדיקים is referring to anyone who performs mitzvos, including רשעים, as the Gemara says (ערובין יט, א. חגיגה כז, א):
    “The fire of Gehinom has no power over the sinners of Israel, since they are filled with mitzvos like a pomegranate.”

    Why should we seek to push away other Yidden if we can bring them close? ידע איניש בנפשיה that we are all not perfect in serving Hashem, let us judge others in the way that we want Hashem to judge us.

    May we be zoche to the geulah shleima when it will be revealed that every Yid is a tzaddik.

    in reply to: Sense of Humor #2133531
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    RebE,

    Never heard that one (the first part at least),
    thanks!

    in reply to: yeridas hadoirois #2130676
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    In reply to the different opinions regarding informing the parents, the statement which I began with still stands:

    “It’s hard to make such a blanket statement. It depends on the bochur, his needs, his environment, etc.”

    Sometimes, (very often) it’s okay to “snitch”. The question we must always ask before informing on someone is: “Am I doing this in order to help/save/protect that person/others, or just because I enjoy being a snitch and getting the guy in trouble?”

    Often, if a someone confided his trust in you, it was because he assumed that you wouldn’t tell others. If you break that trust, even if you’re only doing it for his benifit, it will backfire and from now on he will keep all of his struggles to himself, which is the worst.

    However, I do believe that this can often quite comparable to drug usage or the like. [%30-%40 percent of internet usage is for terrible addictions that do great emotional (and obviously spiritual) damage.]

    But it doesn’t make a difference how bad it is. Even for something like drugs, I would think twice before reporting. Will this help him or make it worse? It all depends on the situation.

    in reply to: yeridas hadoirois #2130301
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    It’s hard to make such a blanket statement. It depends on the bochur, his needs, his environment, etc.

    Sometimes, being so stringent can backfire. If all his friends are in constant contact with each other, but he is cut out from it by force, it can lead him to acquiring devices behind his parents back.

    I personally know a young bochur in an out-of-town yeshiva who is the only one in his class whose parents don’t let him have a cellphone. This is asking for disaster.

    All the bochurim in his class have flip phones that are fully kosher, and they must give it in to the dorm counselor for most of the week (they get it back for Erev Shabbos).

    But this bochur bought a smartphone behind his parents back, and it’s completely unfiltered (r”l), and he uses it throughout the week without reporting it to the dorm counselor. Hanhola thinks that he’s always absent because he likes sleeping in, and his parents still think that he’s the safest bochur in his class from the internet.

    in reply to: Relive Hakhel! #2130274
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Avira,

    The Rebbe clearly mentioned the ב”ח several times in the footnotes of the חלק לד sicha (see footnotes 30, 31. Also see 18).

    The Rebbe is not arguing with the ב”ח or the פרמ”ג, since he does not say that kavanah is unnecessary, rather that it is not עיקר גוף המצוה (aside from unique cases).

    “or was not aware of it”

    The Rebbe was aware of the פרמ”ג about למען, and he quotes it several times.

    For example:

    1) In a letter to Rav Avrohom Chaim Noeh in 5712 (אגרות קודש חלק ה ע’ קי ס”ו, also in לקוטי שיחות חלק כט ע’ 500).

    2) לקוטי שיחות חלק לד ע’ 140 footnotes 5, 12, 46 (over there the Rebbe give a lengthy שקו”ט regarding the reason why the Mechaber brings the טעמי המצוות for mitzvas sukka.)

    in reply to: Relive Hakhel! #2130223
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    “since the Torah writes “lemaan””

    See aforementioned sicha – footnote 17, for the difference between the lemaan of tefillin, tzitzis, etc. and the lemaan of Hakhel.

    While kavana is necessary for Tefillin, it is not גוף המצוה, rather מתנאי המצוה, as opposed to תפלה.
    See more at length in לקוטי שיחות חלק כב ע’ 116 ואילך. https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=15952&st=&pgnum=130
    See also בית אלקים להמבי”ט שער התפלה פ”ג.

    [P.S. Again, I never looked into the dinim of writing. My rov has guided me to follow the Rebbe’s behavior in this case, and he would sign his chol hamoed letters with מפני קדושת המועד לא באתי עהח”ת, so that’s what I do as well.
    But again, you are probably right that this does not apply to virtual writing]

    in reply to: Relive Hakhel! #2130150
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    UJM, Gadolhadorah,

    You’re very welcome,
    Of course, despite all different דרכים, we can always find things which we can agree upon.

    Avira,

    RE Tefillin:

    Good question.
    In לקוטי שיחות חלק לד ע’ 211 ואילך, the Rebbe addresses the difference between תפלין, ציצית, וכדומה and Hakhel.
    In short: Although the kavana is very important by putting Tefillin, it is not a part of גוף המצוה. Whereas there are certain מצוות (e.g. מצות תפלה) that the kavana is part of the mitzva itself, and not just a condition to fulfilling the mitzva.
    The Rebbe is מדייק there from lashon harambam that Hakhel belongs to the latter catogory, thus strengthening נצחיות המצוה.
    The Rebbe explains this at length with many sources, and he also explains where in the pesukim the Rambam learned this from.

    If you are indeed interested in learning (“תורה היא וללמוד אני צריך”), I would suggest you take a look here: https://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=14957&st=&pgnum=223

    RE בל תוסיף
    Obviously, no one is ch”v saying that this is actually the mitzva of Hakhel itself nowadays (ראה לקוטי שיחות שם הערה 38). I don’t think that borrowing the name of a mitzva בשם המושאל constitutes bal tosif, but if your rov says so, I guess you should obey.

    Ah gutten moed!

    [P.S. RE Writing on Chol Homoed:
    I haven’t put much thought into it. I am used to writing in Lashon Hakodesh, and I usually add מפני קדושת המועד. So I guess when I’m typing I do the same sometimes. I haven’t really looked into the differece between typing and writing (though I would assume that typing is much more linient), nor the difference between English and Lashon Hakodesh. Maybe you can be more מאריך about this in a seperate thread.]

    in reply to: Relive Hakhel! #2130121
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Syag, RSo, etc.

    The Rebbe published several talks where he discusses the idea of Hakhel from a halachic standpoint, explaining the ideas which he said.

    Please let me know the questions/issues that you find with the idea of Hakhel (aside from the fact that the Lubavitcher Rebbe is a daas yochid, and was the first one who promoted it) and I will look into it.

    מפני קדושת המועד לא באתי עה”ח

    in reply to: Relive Hakhel! #2130109
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Syag,

    You’re right, we can’t just let people use whatever names we want for things. For that we have our gedolim. It is for this reason that I made it clear that this was started by the Lubavitcher Rebbe.

    Meanwhile, no one had any substantial issue with Hakhel. Their only problem with it was that it has no support from Gedolim besides the Lubavitcher Rebbe, and they don’t consider the Rebbe to be a דעה.

    In other words, they didn’t argue against my point at all, rather they just said that they don’t hold of the gadol who made this point, meaning that there is some sort of animosity to the Rebbe.

    To this I expressed my disapointment that Yidden haven’t learned to accept that just because they don’t accept a certain gadol (either for a good reason, or out of ignorance, which I fear is usually the case) that doesn’t mean that they should bash others who do accept him and spread his teachings (obviously, in a respectful way. Like starting a topic on a forum).

    If someone would have asked an actual Torah question on Hakhel, I would have never responded about achdus and ahavas yisroel. I would have researched the answer like any idea in Torah. If someone says “stop proselytizing what the Lubavitcher Rebbe says” – that seems to be sinas chinam.

    Correct me if I’m wrong.

    מפני קדושת המועד לא באתי עהח”ת

    in reply to: Relive Hakhel! #2130001
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    GadolHadofi,

    There’s no point in rehashing old endless discussions and arguments. Too much ink has been spilled in YWNCR on the “Who is a greater gadol” competition.

    I feel that if someone respectfully posted a request “to all of klal yisroel” from his own, unknown Rosh Yeshiva or teacher (e.g. to say a certain kapital of Tehilim every day, to use out a certain day to give extra tzedaka, etc.) – no one would bat an eyelid. Some people would be inspired to follow, others would ignore it and move on in life.

    I cannot fathom why people are so disturbed from my posting the call of the Lubavitcher Rebbe to add in achdus in honor of shnas hakhel. If it doesn’t interest you, move on to the next subject.

    I don’t know. Maybe now that we are so close to the geula, the satan is using every means at his desposal to sow machlokes among Yidden.

    May Hashem help us overcome this stumbling block and merit the Geula shleima, וקהל גדול ישובו הנה.

    in reply to: Relive Hakhel! #2129991
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Always,

    Geirim seems to be referring to Geir tzedek.
    The chiddush of geirim is that even though they may not understand the words of the Torah, they still come, since it’s not just about understanding, but the general feeling of awe with all of Klal Yisroel standing together.

    ראה רמב”ם הלכות חגיגה פרק ג ה”ו:
    וגרים שאינן מכירין חיבין להכין לבם ולהקשיב אזנם לשמע באימה ויראה וגילה ברעדה כיום שנתנה בו בסיני.

    RE loudspeakers:

    Since the idea is not just to understand, rather the general feeling – there is no need for everyone to be able to hear. The main mitzva is just to be there, and have the right kavana.

    As the Rambam makes it clear at the end of the aforementioned halacha:
    ומי שאינו יכול לשמוע מכון לבו לקריאה זו, שלא קבעה הכתוב אלא לחזק דת האמת. ויראה עצמו כאלו עתה נצטוה בה ומפי הגבורה שומעה, שהמלך שליח הוא להשמיע דברי הא-ל.
    (This is not referring to someone who is deaf, since they are potur from Hakhel altogether (see Rambam שם ה”ב) – rather to those who are too distant from the king’s bima)

Viewing 50 posts - 651 through 700 (of 844 total)