mdd1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 201 through 250 (of 409 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 2 States #2148112
    mdd1
    Participant

    Ujm and Avira, there is such an issur as limud kategoriya on Klal Yisroel. Namely, if a group of Jews (even if they are reshoim and even if we are talking about only the people of one town) do something wrong, it is forbidden to mention it unless there is big toeles in doing so. For sure, it is forbidden to make up slander about them.

    in reply to: 2 States #2147737
    mdd1
    Participant

    Also, Avirah (of Phylistyn?), your claim that thet never bothered the old Yishuv is sheker. They never bothered them the way the later bothered the Zionists.
    Buddy, when you “flipped out” you lost your “balance” a bit. Time to work on it.

    in reply to: 2 States #2147734
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah, I said they did not start the violence. The Altalina was kind of killing be’din malkus. I do not accept everything Reb Chaim said, and even him -you have to know how far he meant. Again, I do not deny the Der Yassin — but you have to look at the context! Why just jump to accuse other Jews — “bo u’ree ma bein poshei Yisroel le’neviey Umos ha’Oilam…”! I know many of them were reshoim ben adam le’Mokom, but you do not have to slander them like that! Comparing them to the Nazis and the Japanese invaders!

    in reply to: 2 States #2147685
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah, and the expulsion from the rst of the Arab villages happened shortly after Der Yassin — during the Israeli independence war. The Arabs were asking for it — big time.

    in reply to: 2 States #2147683
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah, Der Yasssin happened after almost 30 years of Arab attacks and in response to the murder of thousands Jews that had been slaughtered right before that! Historians you are getting it from are the revisionist, or lefty of anti-Semitic types. Again shame on you!

    in reply to: 2 States #2147600
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah ,the Arabs started the violence and were responsible for the most of it. The Jews only responded. Shame on you!

    in reply to: 2 States #2147599
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah, go learn some history (even from non-Israeli sources). Stop with your outrageous lies! The Arabs officially rejected the partition plans a number of times.

    in reply to: Cherem on sefer “Pshuto Shel Mikra” #2145471
    mdd1
    Participant

    Catch yourself (indeed!), the mainstream opinion is that we are free to reject Midrashei Chazal? Who told you that?!?
    Avirah, (with his kanaus) do you have anything to answer to the Shlomo’s story with the two Battei Din in E. Yisroel?

    in reply to: Taking a Kulah from Across the Aisle #2145126
    mdd1
    Participant

    Also, I agree with Aviira.

    in reply to: Taking a Kulah from Across the Aisle #2145124
    mdd1
    Participant

    Yabia, following the Torah properly is an IMPERATIVE ISSUE for Klal Yisroel.
    1, if one Rov holds that something is muttar and 5 other Rabboinim hold it is not, it not just muttar.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2139379
    mdd1
    Participant

    DaMoshe, which terrible situation?

    in reply to: Barbaric Civilization #2138669
    mdd1
    Participant

    Philosopher, vaccines have been saving lives! Stop with propaganda initiated by the barbarians.

    in reply to: Barbaric Civilization #2138668
    mdd1
    Participant

    How about the mitsva of ‘lo sechaye kol neshama” regarding the 7 nations of Kena’an? Mitsva to execute those who are chayav misa? Kanolm pogim bo? Etc. AAQ and others, what do you say?

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2138608
    mdd1
    Participant

    In the overwhelming majority of cases it is the ancestors who went off or were forced off.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2138605
    mdd1
    Participant

    It is by far, by far more of a second (the ancestors going off) than the first.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2138598
    mdd1
    Participant

    Yabia Omer, you are so clueless about how the Ashkenazim are! It is impossible to keep in the fold those 80% without compromising Halocha. Nobody was mafkir them, they did it to themselves or their ancestors went off and the descendants are not easy to repair.

    in reply to: Today Kherson has been liberated #2138323
    mdd1
    Participant

    Jackk, when there are a lot of Jews together, like in Uman on R. H, then it is different. It is difficult to attack a crowd.
    Regarding the Chabad it is a blatant, verifiable propaganda lie!

    in reply to: Today Kherson has been liberated #2138289
    mdd1
    Participant

    AAQ, no, no, you can not let those horrible Russians bomb anything even the Hitler’s bunker in Berlin. Oh, those Russkies!

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2138287
    mdd1
    Participant

    YO, I already answered your question. “The Yeshiva world” is an idiom with a certain meaning. Stop pretending you do not understand. AAQ, the same goes for you.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2138212
    mdd1
    Participant

    When they say “the Yeshiva world” they mean what I wrote. Just explainnig the idioms to YO who pretends not to know them.

    in reply to: Today Kherson has been liberated #2138203
    mdd1
    Participant

    Jackk, AAQ, do you know that it is sakonas nefoshos to wear a yarmulke in the street in Ukraine?!? In Russia it is also dangerous, but in Ukraine it is worse.

    in reply to: Today Kherson has been liberated #2138202
    mdd1
    Participant

    Jackk, what in the world are you talking about? How many shuls are there already in Ukraine? And again, Putin does not target neither the shuls, nor the Jews ,nor the Ukrainian civilians. Stop with the propaganda hysteria.

    in reply to: Today Kherson has been liberated #2137875
    mdd1
    Participant

    According to AAQ, the US has not gone to war in the last 80 years. Yep, sure.

    in reply to: Today Kherson has been liberated #2137645
    mdd1
    Participant

    And partially to philosopher.

    in reply to: Today Kherson has been liberated #2137568
    mdd1
    Participant

    You have been swept by the ignorant and biased media frenzy. Learn the true facts.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2137523
    mdd1
    Participant

    Yabia Omer, The Yeshiva world is BMG, Mir, Beis Ha’Talmud, Chaim Berlin etc. Do not pretend you did not know this. Having a cheilek in Torah and being a Torah Jew are two different things. Do not pretend to be that ignorant. Is an OTD fellow a Torah Jew? However, potentially he has a cheilek in Torah.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2136638
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avira, what’s your point?

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2136600
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avira, wearing tzitzis and a yarmulke are enough reminders of Jewishness, strictly speaking.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2136437
    mdd1
    Participant

    Yabia, what do you mean by “the Sefardi derech”? We do not know what you refer to.
    Ujm, Rav Shach was in theory “land for peace”. Le’ma’ase he was strongly opposed to it as he did not trust the Arabs. I think he was also opposed to joining a left-wing government in Israel.

    in reply to: History of the Shas Party #2136357
    mdd1
    Participant

    UJM, you are totally misinformed about what Rav Shach held.
    Yabia, Shas was lead by Chacham Ovadia. He did not know about the Sefardi mesora? Or according to you, the Sefardi mesorah means kullos through the roof and anything goes, chas ve’sholom?

    in reply to: POLL hocul-zeldin #2132236
    mdd1
    Participant

    Ujm, Germany is a separate story. There the assimilation started much earlier. Yaakov Doe was referring to the Eastern- European Jews who immigrated to the US.

    in reply to: Putin’s attempted annexation of four Ukrainian provinces #2129305
    mdd1
    Participant

    Chiefshmerel, there is also a statue of Symyon Petlura in Kiev. His army did a repeat of the Tach ve’Tat in 1918-1920.

    in reply to: Russia is losing the war in Ukraine #2126912
    mdd1
    Participant

    I meant, the north-eastern parts threw off the yoke of the Mongols.

    in reply to: Russia is losing the war in Ukraine #2126903
    mdd1
    Participant

    The Ukr. nationalists did not want to be friends with Russia — they hate Russia. Always…, the vote took place in 2014 only in Crimea.
    Yea, a Russian troll who reveals to you that it is dangerous to wear a yarmulke in the street in Russia.

    in reply to: Russia is losing the war in Ukraine #2126902
    mdd1
    Participant

    Always, wrong guess. Try again.
    So, in the 13th century, Rus’ was overrun and demolished by the Mongols. Its’ north-eastern part fell under the overlordship of the Golden Horde, a Mongol state, but they were allowed to retain their government structure with a broad autonomy, and the local leaders were dukes descendant from the old Grand Dukes of Kiev. The western parts of Rus’ were divided between Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. They, however, did not retain autonomous government structures and just became parts of the Grand Duchy or colonies of Poland. Eventually, the north-western parts overthrew the yoke of the Mongols and formed an independent Russian state. After Chmelnitskiy, imach shmo, rebelled against the Poles, his people decided to become an autonomous part of Moscow’s Russia, and Russia agreed to defend them against the Poles.

    in reply to: Russia is losing the war in Ukraine #2126832
    mdd1
    Participant

    Ganza never played a big role there, even though Novgorod was a member of the League. Moscow was a small city/town in the later Kievan Rus’ period. To be continued…

    in reply to: Russia is losing the war in Ukraine #2126827
    mdd1
    Participant

    How I came to have such views will have to remain an enigma.Though, I think, you can decipher it if you try.
    The answers to the history questions will have to wait till later tonight — I have run now.

    in reply to: Russia is losing the war in Ukraine #2126472
    mdd1
    Participant

    Always…, I understand that legally Ukraine is a sovereign country. So what business does Russia have getting involved there? However, if you know that originally they were one country for centuries and then again from 1654 till 1991, and that the dukes of Moscow had in the interim always wanted to reunite with the western parts of the original Russia, and that many people in southern and eastern Ukraine want the reunion now, and that they and Russia resent tremendously the anti-Russian brainwashing and falsification of history conducted by Ukrainian nationalists in Ukraine, you start to see the Russia’s view on the situation.

    in reply to: Russia is losing the war in Ukraine #2126092
    mdd1
    Participant

    I hesitate to accept Ujm’s praise.
    Chiefsmerel, my knowledge of history is based on solid sources.
    Always…, on which matter?

    in reply to: Russia is losing the war in Ukraine #2126093
    mdd1
    Participant

    Actually, Always…, I do not want to reveal too much, but I will tell you that I, for sure, know more about the situation there and the historical background thereof than an average person in the US, Canada or the UK.
    I would like to add: FYI — you can not walk in the street in a yarmulke in Russia. In Ukraine it is even worse. Sakonas nefoshes.
    If you do not wear anything specifically Jewish, it is okay. Still you have to beware of the regular criminals. Especially, if you are a foreigner who may be presumed to have money, and you are in Ukraine. I am also not sure if being a western guy is popular in Russia these days.

    in reply to: Russia is losing the war in Ukraine #2125640
    mdd1
    Participant

    “How can you be happy about people walking in the dark…” — Amerikanishe sensibilities and wrong ones at that. They are their enemies. How can you be happy about a person dying? Yet the Shulchan Aruch says that if a rasha dies, you are supposed to be happy about it.

    in reply to: Russia is losing the war in Ukraine #2125434
    mdd1
    Participant

    Jackk, how about the Palestinian civilians in Gaza, including children, killed by Israeli bombs?
    Those pro-Russian civilians from eastern Ukraine wanted to leave the war zone. Ever thought of it?

    in reply to: Russia is losing the war in Ukraine #2125391
    mdd1
    Participant

    Cheifshmerel, I almost want to rip my hair out! Lithuania before WWI and controlling Kiev and Odessa no less!?! It was not independent before WWI, and neither was Poland. Kmelnitski was most certainly a Ukrainian! You spin the history by your sheer ignorance of it. Russian was not good to the Jews, but Ukraine was even worse.
    Always…, are you aware that many people in southern and Eastern Ukraine do want to join Russia? And there would be more of them in central Ukraine, but the people there were brainwashed after 1991? Russia was spooked by the violent overthrow of the Ukrainian government, by the way.

    in reply to: Russia is losing the war in Ukraine #2125370
    mdd1
    Participant

    Jackk, more and more fake news! The ones “deported” to Russia wanted to go there (at least, almost all of them). Stop swallowing the propaganda? Graves in Izum? Were those people killed unintemtionally by shelling? Caught in the crossfire?

    in reply to: Russia is losing the war in Ukraine #2125367
    mdd1
    Participant

    Chiefshmerel, you words show clearly that you do not have even the most basic knowledge of those countries’ history! What you wrote about Ukraine being a part of Austria and Poland applies only to the Western Ukraine (Galicia). Most of Ukraine was part of the Russian Empire. The Ukrainians were worse toward the the Jews than the Russians! Especially when they were independent. Remember Tach ve’Tat massacres? The Petlura pogroms? Most pogroms in the Russian Empire were carried out by Ukrainians in Ukraine. Learn the history!

    in reply to: Russia is losing the war in Ukraine #2125283
    mdd1
    Participant

    Always, come on — you do not know the history of those places. Moscow principality was ruled by the direct descendants of the Grand Dukes of Kiev. Why Ukraine was not in charge of Moscow? I can not teach you a full course on the Russian (and Ukrainian) history in the coffee room here. Get yourself a reputable book on the subject and learn it in the bathroom — to avoid bittul Torah.

    in reply to: Russia is losing the war in Ukraine #2125247
    mdd1
    Participant

    Ujm, they are distinct from the regular Russians, but are very close to them.

    in reply to: Russia is losing the war in Ukraine #2125239
    mdd1
    Participant

    Always, both the principality of Galicia and the principality of Moscow used to be part of the Kievan Rus’.

    in reply to: Russia is losing the war in Ukraine #2125235
    mdd1
    Participant

    Always, Ruthenians called themselves “Russini” — extremely close to Russkiye. The Grand duchy of Moscow emerged from the old Rus’. You do not know the history of those places, my freind. Like I said, go learn it. It is an outrageous Polish lie — to claim that the Russian kingdom of Moscow had nothing to do with the old Russia of Kiev.
    Overall, the Ukrainians were a majority in eastern Galicia, but not in the cities.
    The Ukrainian Catholics were ethnic Ukrainians who because of the centuries of pressure converted.
    Stop with your anti-Russian hysteria already.

    in reply to: Russia is losing the war in Ukraine #2125202
    mdd1
    Participant

    Always…, learn some Russian (and Ukrainian) history, and you will see that your comparison to the Arabs have nothing to do with the facts.
    A thousand years ago there existed on the territory of what is now northern and western Ukraine, Belarus and western Russia a country called “Rus'”. Rashi and Tosfos called it Russiya. Nobody beard of Ukraine till many centuries later. Stop with your anti-Russian propaganda.

Viewing 50 posts - 201 through 250 (of 409 total)