mdd1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 51 through 100 (of 409 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Tear Down the Wall between Egypt and Gaza #2247372
    mdd1
    Participant

    Kuvult, the mass immigration of Jews had been restricted from 1924 on.

    in reply to: I guess ChaBaD is Zionist now? #2247107
    mdd1
    Participant

    Sechel83, there are statements in Medroshim and Gemoros which are Kabbola-based.
    Gemora in the second perek of Hagiga is very clear that Kabbola is to be studied only by people who meet a number of strict requeirements.
    Those who understand the sources that you brought down literally are minim whose wine is yain nesech etc.
    Menachem, it is enough Kabbola for people to stumble in as we see here and elsewhere among the the Chabad people.

    in reply to: I guess ChaBaD is Zionist now? #2246742
    mdd1
    Participant

    5783, it just shows in plain sight what happens when people who are not holding by it learn Kabbola.

    in reply to: Menorah in your face #2245558
    mdd1
    Participant

    Common siechel (Joe), did the Jews in the times of the Beis Ha’Mikdash or in the times of Rashi insist on wearing shtreimels? If no, why should it be done now? Did they insist on speaking Yiddish in times of Ravina? If not…

    in reply to: Rally in Washington #2241204
    mdd1
    Participant

    1. I moche/protest against the bizoyon of a Talmid Chocham — Rav Sorotzkin!
    2 Zeff, have you ever heard of the issur of being united with reshoim?

    in reply to: Thought on Chabad #2226499
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah, their not sleeping in the sukkah has nothing to do with that Ramo. We’ve discussed it here!!

    in reply to: Thought on Chabad #2226456
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah, not sleeping in the sukkah started with the second Rebbe.

    in reply to: Thought on Chabad #2225624
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avira, you are wrong, but I am not going to start a long argument with you.

    in reply to: Thought on Chabad #2225575
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah, the way they argue it is clear that, at least, sometimes they consider the other shitah plain wrong and not a 70 panim le’Torah.
    Why only Or Ha’Haim? And what — a Yid who thinks that is a real apikores?

    in reply to: Thought on Chabad #2225523
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah, that Gemorah talks about Amoroim. Plus, it lav davka implies that his opinion was guided by ruach ha’kodesh. Also, with your understanding of ruach ha’kodesh, how can one ever argue on an opinion of an Achron?

    in reply to: Thought on Chabad #2225492
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah…, LUbavitch goes with the Ba’al Ha’Tanya’s opinion on shkiyah from his siddur (later in his life) against the psak of his Shulchan Aruch.

    in reply to: Thought on Chabad #2225491
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah…, how do you know that the Sh”Aruch ha’Rav was written with ruach ha’kodesh?

    in reply to: Thought on Chabad #2225417
    mdd1
    Participant

    Emunas, we are a Chazal-defined religion, not an Arizal-defined one.
    Also, what is your definition of kesher with H’, and why, according to you, it is possible only through tefilah (at least, in our time)?

    in reply to: Thought on Chabad #2225212
    mdd1
    Participant

    Emunas, who are these hundreds of Gedolim?

    in reply to: Thought on Chabad #2224888
    mdd1
    Participant

    Emunas, that is the shitah of Chabad and Mekubalim, and it is a chiddush. Look what I wrote to CS. Even a statement from Arizal about everybody learning Kabbola can not help against the chashash of the stumbling block. The Shabbtai Zvi and Ya’akov Frank sects and Chabad are primary examples of this concern being fullfilled.

    in reply to: Thought on Chabad #2224777
    mdd1
    Participant

    CS, I do not know why you decided to address me with these questions.
    As far learning Kabbolah goes, it is okay to do it only for a few select indivduals in Klal Yisroel. Mishna in Hagigah says: “we are not to give over sisrei Torah but only to a wise one who understadns on his own…”. There are other mekoros, and that is the mesorah of the Ashkenaz Jewry. One of the main reasons is the possibility of coming out with a terribly wrong pshat.
    I personally have knowledge of Nistar on an introductory level.

    in reply to: Thought on Chabad #2224473
    mdd1
    Participant

    Menachem…, I did not mean every single mechaber. I meant generally speaking.

    in reply to: kolel for everyone #2224463
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah, you are talking about the times of Moshiach, I am talking about olam ha’ze.

    in reply to: Thought on Chabad #2224458
    mdd1
    Participant

    Ujm, you do not realize the unbelievable chashivus ascribed by Chabad to the statements of Arizal.

    in reply to: kolel for everyone #2224450
    mdd1
    Participant

    Always, where does it say that in the last week’s parsha?!?
    Follow…, taking Section 8 and food stamps by many is chilul H’ and hisgarus be’umos.

    in reply to: Thought on Chabad #2224448
    mdd1
    Participant

    Menachem…, I wrote what I did because it is accepted by Klal Yisroel – from the Litvishe to Sefardi Mekubalim that Rambam did not learn Kabbolah. Arizal said so (!!), Arizal (!!). I mean which bigger source would Chabad want?
    Your sources to the contrary do not appear to be strong. And the Besht argued with the Arizal?!?!

    in reply to: Thought on Chabad #2224189
    mdd1
    Participant

    CS, Rambam never learnt Kabbola.

    in reply to: kolel for everyone #2224059
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah, reality check! By the frumer Litvishe everybody goes to kollel and some do by the Chassidim. It is not a tiny percentage by any means!
    OP, Gemora in Eiruvin says that divrei Torah get preserved only in those who are as cruel to their children as a crow (by giving them substandard food).

    in reply to: Thought on Chabad #2223615
    mdd1
    Participant

    Always, we are not talking about your political preferences, we are talking about da’as Torah. Advising people to move from western Europe to Russia was impractical — you have to know the metzius of the situation.
    And, be’chlal, who could have advised anyone to move to Russia in view of the fact that their army would go into Ukraine in 2022?

    in reply to: Shidduchim Between Litvish Girls and Chasidish Boys #2223589
    mdd1
    Participant

    Ujm (Josef’s younger brother), extreme chumros are not beautiful Yidddishe minhagim.

    in reply to: Thought on Chabad #2223544
    mdd1
    Participant

    Ba’al ha’Tanya was greater than Rebbi Yochanan ben Zakai?!?!? Another thing which shows what is wrong with Chabad.
    Always…, Chofets Chaim ended up beyond the Russian/Soviet borders after the Soviet-Polish war of 1920.

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2223264
    mdd1
    Participant

    Sechel83, “Hashem” must be spelled with a capital H!
    Secondly, so, according to Kedushas Ha’Leivi Yirmiyahu ha’Navi was no good (c”v!!)?

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2222860
    mdd1
    Participant

    ARSo, if someone has heretical views, it is not okay to just let it go without challenging them.

    in reply to: False Claim about Jewish History #2222583
    mdd1
    Participant

    Things, exaggerated propaganda.

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2221130
    mdd1
    Participant

    Nomesorah, #$%@!&*^$%$$###%##!!!!! Okay?

    in reply to: Rabbi Pruzansky and the Israeli Army #2220737
    mdd1
    Participant

    Yabia Omer, DO NOT START UP! Sefardim being Sefardim: who cares if people do aveiros?

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2220732
    mdd1
    Participant

    Nomesorah, guess what? Some Rishonim hold that conversion to Islam is not “yehareig ve’lo’yavor” as it is not an avodah zorah. Those who hold it is “yehareig…” is because they view conversion to Islam as a kefirah in a part of nevuas Moshe Rabbeinu. Christianity is an avodah zorah for a Jew.
    Before writing your posts here, maybe go learn the sugyos.

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2220570
    mdd1
    Participant

    Nomesorah, CHAS VE”SHOLOM!! You are as wrong as wrong can be! Why were Yidden going to be killed instead of accepting Chirstianity?!?!?

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2220440
    mdd1
    Participant

    ARSo, “Atzmus besoch ha’guf” is a Christian-type heresy.

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2220325
    mdd1
    Participant

    CS, about the determining who is a tzadik according to the Tanya by talking to him etc.: I am really sorry, but your answer really does not hold water — you can’t tell if a person killed his yetzer ha’ra by talking to him. A person can be on the level to control his yetzer ha’ra and say and do the right things, but it does not mean that he killed it. According to the Tanya’s definition of a tzadik, no one can really tell who he is.

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2219713
    mdd1
    Participant

    How does one know that a person is a tzadik in the Tanya’s definition? In Shamaim they know, but people?

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2219580
    mdd1
    Participant

    Menachem…, why do you think Chabad has so many misnagdim, way more than other Chassidic groups?

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2219477
    mdd1
    Participant

    CS, just because someone accepts responsibility to help every Jew it makes him a Nasi Ha’Dor? This is ridiculous. And then there are many Nsiei Ha’Dor according to your definition. Rav Shach included.

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2219043
    mdd1
    Participant

    Yankel Berel, but that is the problem — that one may learn the wrong pshat. Also, not many people learn really deep Kabbola.

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2219033
    mdd1
    Participant

    Menachem…, a big reason why Chazal opposed learning Kabbola by everybody is because of a big hashash michshol! Understand? The Arizal’s heter helps only for the reason that it is kovod Shamaim to keep it hidden. It does not help for the hashash michshoilim!

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2218966
    mdd1
    Participant

    CS, the Yidden believed that Moshe Rabbeinu was a real messenger of Ha”SHEm, a real novi.

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2218965
    mdd1
    Participant

    Nomesorah, stop with your shtussim. The problem with the Christians was not that they stopped observing Halochah. The main problem was that they believe(d) that Yoshke is a part of G-d. That’s why it is considered an Avodah Zorah. That is why Yidden throughout the ages would rather die than accept their faith. These are basic, well-known facts of the Jewish law and Jewish history.

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2218703
    mdd1
    Participant

    So, all the Chabaniks here, what is the problem with Christianity? Why did the GR”A put Chassidim into cheirem?
    After reading your statements I came to realize that Chabad is a much bigger mess than I had thought.

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2217198
    mdd1
    Participant

    Ujm, Noam Elimelech was. As far as the other mekoros go, were you asleep all this time? I did write that there are statements, especially in sifrei Kabbola, which can be misunderstood that way. And that’s why most people should not be learning Kabbola.

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2217058
    mdd1
    Participant

    Menachem…, you mentioned a whole number of Chassidishe Rebbes in your list. Well, the GR”A was afraid that the Chassidim would make their Rebbes into avoda zorah.

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2216818
    mdd1
    Participant

    Menachem…, the problem is that a fair number of Lubavitchers understood it the wrong way. And it is a mess. The Gra, you know, was afraid of the Chassidim making their Rebbe into an avodah zorah. It is a tremenous michshol — not somethig to view with complacency!

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2216627
    mdd1
    Participant

    Nomesorah, again, to say that “a human is G-d” is total minus. That is the mesorah(!!) of the whole of Klal Yisroel! Stop justifying minus!! One MAY NOT just read statements from Kabbolah seforim literally and claim that this is what the Kabbolah says.

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2216405
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah, all of this “more temptation” stuff does not change the Halochah! Your Amerishkaiyt is so much in your bones that it is impossible to talk to you.

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2216403
    mdd1
    Participant

    Seihel83 and NOmesora (indeed!), because it is a mesorah in Klal Yisroel since the time of Chazal that it is minus to hold like that. Yidden went to be burned on a stake just not to be mode to this minus. Nomesorah, it is this why that fellows like you should be kept away from sifrei Kabbolah at a distance of “metachavei keshes”! Same apllies to majority of people (Sechel83 included).

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2216346
    mdd1
    Participant

    Nomesorah, enough of your trying to justify anything and everything! To say that some human is G-d clothed in human form is pure apikorsus, Christianity! All of this is based on misunderstanding statements in sifrei Kabbolah. Started with Yoshke and his talmidim. Enough is enough!

Viewing 50 posts - 51 through 100 (of 409 total)