mdd1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 396 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: תפקיד vis a vis גלגולים #2324383
    mdd1
    Participant

    And it is not a posuk — rather, a ma’amar Chazal.

    in reply to: תפקיד vis a vis גלגולים #2324382
    mdd1
    Participant

    Happy New year, what are you saying? It does not say that once all the neshomos are out of the guf, Moshiach must come right away. It says he can not come earlier.

    in reply to: Ukraine Asks Jew not to Come to Uman #2316412
    mdd1
    Participant

    Always, what in the world are you talking about?!? I advised you to read a serious history book on the Eastern-European history. Have you followed my advice? By September 17, 1939, there existed only 2 possibilities: either those lands falling under the Nazis or being taken over by the Soviets. There was no third choice. Which hunger are you talking about?!? The hunger happened in 1932-1933.
    Stop with your uninformed anti-Russian propaganda.

    in reply to: Ukraine Asks Jew not to Come to Uman #2315585
    mdd1
    Participant

    Always, I do not condone the Stalin’s terror, but those territories were majority Ukrainian or Belorussian. Poland unfairly grabbed them after WW1. If the Soviets had not been there, it would have been the Nazis.
    Plus, we were just discussing if those areas were a real war zone.

    in reply to: Ukraine Asks Jew not to Come to Uman #2315271
    mdd1
    Participant

    EX-Citylawyer, learn the facts. When the USSR forces entered the Ukrainian and Belorussian areas of Poland to prevent them from falling into the German hands, the was not real fighting there as the Polish government ordered their soldiers not to resist the Russians because it was pointless by that time. There were only some skirmishes – not a real war zone. And, for sure, not in the central Ukraine.

    in reply to: Biggest supporter of Torah in the world #2300110
    mdd1
    Participant

    HaKatan, before the Zionists the E. Yisroel was a 3rd-world place. Now, it is a first-world place.

    in reply to: Why The Zionists Have a Point Leshitosom #2295022
    mdd1
    Participant

    Gadol…, cut out your apikorsus – you can’t dismiss a Gemora like that. Also, you misunderstood it. The Gemora says that Torah protects the Talmidei Chachomim themselves. There is another Gemora nearby which says that their Torah provides a degree of protection to others as well. It does not mean, however, that it is guaranteed that nothing can happen to them.

    in reply to: Applying FDR’s Germany stance for Gaza #2288886
    mdd1
    Participant

    Akuperma, Germans not supporting anti-Hitler conspiracies – a far-off sfeik-sfeik-sfeika argument. When one has no other arguments.

    in reply to: Chasidus Filling a Void Within Modern Orthodoxy #2288298
    mdd1
    Participant

    Chaim87, any names of G-d must be spelled with a capital first letter.

    in reply to: Chasidus Filling a Void Within Modern Orthodoxy #2287389
    mdd1
    Participant

    DaMoshe, +1!! Do not be fazed by all the krume attacks on you! I do not have time now to help you respond.

    mdd1
    Participant

    Hakatan, STOP twisting things — MOST of the kings of the Malchus Yisroel were self-appointed.
    The Zionists caused the Holocaust?!? Yea, right, all the other aveiros were insignificant, but the the Zionism…
    And you need to calm down.

    mdd1
    Participant

    Hakatan Yerovam was not the worst of them.

    mdd1
    Participant

    Hakatan, most of the malchei Yisroel were self-appointed reshoim. You need to learn NaCh.
    And, yes, of course, according to your ideology, it is better to have kings-reshoim from a legitimate dynasty who killed Neviim or attempted to do so than to have Netanyahu.

    in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2278881
    mdd1
    Participant

    Ujm, let’s be honest — if not for the the Israel’s government money (and the Zionists building up the economy), the kollel system there would not have been able to exist. Let us be honest. Was there such a system in Russia or Poland 150 years ago?!?
    LT, a miracle like kriyas Yam Suf?!? Yeh, sure. Obviously, you can’t take this guy seriously. And do re-read my post about ISIS!

    in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2278765
    mdd1
    Participant

    “The last 75 years saw less Jews killed” than any other period since Churbun — absolutely false! Over 20,000 were murdered. Between 1805 and 1880 it did not happen. Learn the Jewish history!

    in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2278422
    mdd1
    Participant

    LT, about the casualty rate: ISIS wanted to fight urban warfare against Americans – to inflict casualties on them. They did not want to fight against the Israelis because they deemed the Israelis to be well-trained in that type of combat.
    The article was an American one from 20 years ago – from the Americans who thought you could not create such a system! the statement from the staffer does not imply a neis golui! And I never said that no nissim ever happened in E. Yisroel in the last 70 years.

    in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2278221
    mdd1
    Participant

    HaLevi, you mean the “New methodology…” Rand’s article? I could not easily access it (the Adobe reader does not work well). It is an American article from 1994! Why don’t you bring something from 1916? At the beginning of the 90-s the Israelis suggested creating a missile defense system, the Americans said it was doomed to fail. So, the article fits with the whole discussion.

    in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2278026
    mdd1
    Participant

    LT, so far you are the only person that I hear this from. Are you an aerospace engineer? Nobody else is saying this. Okay, by some people everything is a neis nigle.
    And what happened with the nissin on October 7?

    in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2277830
    mdd1
    Participant

    LT, is the Iron Dome performance also a miracle? An open one?

    in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2277825
    mdd1
    Participant

    LT, is that professor a Mizrachi kanoi? At most, it was a neis nistar. An open miracle is something totally she’lo ke’derech ha’teva! get it through your head! And, again, I do not know how unusual it really was. There are people I do not trust about such a situation. Again, Ukraine’s air-defences are NOT on the same level like the Israeli ones.

    in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2277685
    mdd1
    Participant

    LT, Israel has a very sofisticated air-defence system. Ukraine does not. Read the news. Taking down all those projectiles by Israel all the allies is not she’lo ke’derech ha’teva, is not an open miracle.
    About the the casualty rate, I do not know enough about the issue, but the Arabs are not good soldiers. So…

    in reply to: Israel’s choices #2277325
    mdd1
    Participant

    Ujm, Yitzhak Avinu said:”Ve’hoya ka’asher torid” — the crown went to Eisav.

    in reply to: Israel’s choices #2277324
    mdd1
    Participant

    Ujm, certainly. It was gezeirah min ha’Shamaim that they should be the world power at that time.

    in reply to: The open miracles of the Iranian bombardment and the war in Gaza #2277297
    mdd1
    Participant

    LT, there were no open miracles during the Iranian attack. There was nothing she’lo ke’derech ha’teva.

    in reply to: Israel’s choices #2277289
    mdd1
    Participant

    Ujm, it is, obviously, only with siyatta di’Shmaya, but they managed to turn desert into a first-world country and defeat their enemies numerous times. Do not deny the facts.

    in reply to: Shmad in Israel? #2271907
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah…, stop with your libel about the blood thurst!! Just some Zionists felt that in view of how the Arabs and the British acted they would not get the country that was promised to them in a different way.
    and the violence was started by the Arabs who started to attack Jews once they realized the Zionists wanted to restore the Jewish state in the land.

    in reply to: Refuting the Three Oaths [Gimel Shevuot] #2270046
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah…, the only reason the meat from Achav’s and Izevel’s table was kosher was because Ovadiyah ha’Novi was running the household operations.
    And only 2 of the kings of Malchus Yisroel were anointed by Neviim. The rest seized power through coups or were offspring of such kings. They were less legitimate than Netanyahu. You need to learn the sources.

    in reply to: Trump throws Kurds and Ukrainians under the bus, will Israel be next? #2264908
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah, the Kurds being discussed here are America’s allies who fought against ISIS.

    in reply to: Trump throws Kurds and Ukrainians under the bus, will Israel be next? #2264892
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah, the Kurds are not Muslim fundamentalists. Get your facts straight.

    in reply to: Ethics and Entenmann’s #2262756
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avira…, but if they knew all the science there is to know just by the virtue of being Talmidei Chachomim, why would they need to ask anybody?!?

    in reply to: Ethics and Entenmann’s #2262504
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avira, look up the Gemora – then you will understand the kasha.
    It is true that it is all in the Torah. It does not mean, however, that every Talmid Chocham, even 2000 years ago, knew it all. Moshe Rabbeinu, Shlomo ha’melech — okay, but others?

    in reply to: Ethics and Entenmann’s #2262490
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avira, Chazal said that they knew all the science there is to know? Where? Also, how do you explain the Gemora in Niddah 22B which I mentioned above? What we can say is that mestama min Ha’Shamaim they would not allow them to write a mistaken psak into the Gemora.

    in reply to: Ethics and Entenmann’s #2258161
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah, there are people in Lakewood and other places who know Shas.
    Also, there is a Gemora in Nidah 22B which talks about 2 occasions when Chachomim did not know about certain medical metziyus and they asked the doctors for help. According to you, what happened?!? Why did they need the doctors’ explanations?

    in reply to: Ethics and Entenmann’s #2256657
    mdd1
    Participant

    AVirah, it is all in principle in the Torah, it does not not mean every Talmid Chocham ,even in times of Chazal, knew it. And why in the world does thinking that Chazal did not know all the science there is to know make one into an apikores?!?! Is it one of the Yesodos Ha’Emunah? Buddy, there is a Gemora in Nidah that when Chachomim needed to know a certain biological/medical fact they had to rely on what the doctors of their time said!!!

    in reply to: Ethics and Entenmann’s #2256373
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah…, so you are saying that one is obligated to believe that Amoroim knew how to make nuclear bombs, computers etc.?!? I believe it is you who is twisting the sources trying to read things in there which were never meant.

    in reply to: I guess ChaBaD is Zionist now? #2247802
    mdd1
    Participant

    Seichel!!! Becoming a min, a kofer is not serving HKBH!! You show what is wrong with the Chabad approach indeed!!

    in reply to: I guess ChaBaD is Zionist now? #2247552
    mdd1
    Participant

    SEichel, for crying out loud! Azahorah shamanu not to understand those statements literally. The Christians went down that path!
    You can love and fear HKBH even without learning Kabbola. And it is better to loose out on a portion of a mitsva than to end being a min!!!

    in reply to: Tear Down the Wall between Egypt and Gaza #2247372
    mdd1
    Participant

    Kuvult, the mass immigration of Jews had been restricted from 1924 on.

    in reply to: I guess ChaBaD is Zionist now? #2247107
    mdd1
    Participant

    Sechel83, there are statements in Medroshim and Gemoros which are Kabbola-based.
    Gemora in the second perek of Hagiga is very clear that Kabbola is to be studied only by people who meet a number of strict requeirements.
    Those who understand the sources that you brought down literally are minim whose wine is yain nesech etc.
    Menachem, it is enough Kabbola for people to stumble in as we see here and elsewhere among the the Chabad people.

    in reply to: I guess ChaBaD is Zionist now? #2246742
    mdd1
    Participant

    5783, it just shows in plain sight what happens when people who are not holding by it learn Kabbola.

    in reply to: Menorah in your face #2245558
    mdd1
    Participant

    Common siechel (Joe), did the Jews in the times of the Beis Ha’Mikdash or in the times of Rashi insist on wearing shtreimels? If no, why should it be done now? Did they insist on speaking Yiddish in times of Ravina? If not…

    in reply to: Rally in Washington #2241204
    mdd1
    Participant

    1. I moche/protest against the bizoyon of a Talmid Chocham — Rav Sorotzkin!
    2 Zeff, have you ever heard of the issur of being united with reshoim?

    in reply to: Thought on Chabad #2226499
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah, their not sleeping in the sukkah has nothing to do with that Ramo. We’ve discussed it here!!

    in reply to: Thought on Chabad #2226456
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah, not sleeping in the sukkah started with the second Rebbe.

    in reply to: Thought on Chabad #2225624
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avira, you are wrong, but I am not going to start a long argument with you.

    in reply to: Thought on Chabad #2225575
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah, the way they argue it is clear that, at least, sometimes they consider the other shitah plain wrong and not a 70 panim le’Torah.
    Why only Or Ha’Haim? And what — a Yid who thinks that is a real apikores?

    in reply to: Thought on Chabad #2225523
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah, that Gemorah talks about Amoroim. Plus, it lav davka implies that his opinion was guided by ruach ha’kodesh. Also, with your understanding of ruach ha’kodesh, how can one ever argue on an opinion of an Achron?

    in reply to: Thought on Chabad #2225492
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah…, LUbavitch goes with the Ba’al Ha’Tanya’s opinion on shkiyah from his siddur (later in his life) against the psak of his Shulchan Aruch.

    in reply to: Thought on Chabad #2225491
    mdd1
    Participant

    Avirah…, how do you know that the Sh”Aruch ha’Rav was written with ruach ha’kodesh?

    in reply to: Thought on Chabad #2225417
    mdd1
    Participant

    Emunas, we are a Chazal-defined religion, not an Arizal-defined one.
    Also, what is your definition of kesher with H’, and why, according to you, it is possible only through tefilah (at least, in our time)?

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 396 total)