mdd

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 351 through 400 (of 1,759 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chareidim in Israel #958438
    mdd
    Member

    Nishtdayngesheft, I agree with one thing — you’d sure know what “fanatical” means. Btw, I do not agree with the abovementioned graduate of Ner Yisroel.

    in reply to: Akuperma re: "mere annoyance" #957167
    mdd
    Member

    HaKatan, you are wrong. It is useless to reason with you. I won’t do that anymore.

    in reply to: Akuperma re: "mere annoyance" #957162
    mdd
    Member

    HaKatan, do you seriously think that all those early Zionist pioneers who went to live and work and restore the E.Y. under very difficult and with time dangerous conditions were moser nefesh to build a place to shmad Jews? That they left on opportunity to go to America just to do the above? Do you really think that the mass popular support that the Zionists enjoyed among Eastern European Jews was due to all of them being bent on taking others off the derech? Did you read what Hetzel wrote about how and why he decided to start the movement? Do you live in an alternate universe? Did you yourself “gelernt in Brisk” or somebody else who taught you?

    Btw, if you are such a Brisker fan how come do you live in America (which I take you do) — the Rov held it was a treifene medinah?

    in reply to: Akuperma re: "mere annoyance" #957159
    mdd
    Member

    HaKatan, some history reading is in order for you as I have pointed out. I’ll speak Yeshivish: The Brisker shittah is a very,very,very shvere one. Get it?

    in reply to: Akuperma re: "mere annoyance" #957154
    mdd
    Member

    HaKatan, you are wrong.

    Joe(About Time), have a good day.

    in reply to: Akuperma re: "mere annoyance" #957149
    mdd
    Member

    HaKatan, did you review the history of the subject as asked? Like I said most of them were frei. A lot of them were kofrim. The Brisker claim is,however, that they started the whole movement in order to take Yidden off the derech. And that was not what happened.

    in reply to: Akuperma re: "mere annoyance" #957147
    mdd
    Member

    HaKatan, when oso roshah spoke of normalizing the Jewish conditon he meant giving them a land and a state of their own where they’ll be safe and become like the rest of the world.

    Agreed, most of the Zionists were frei– hence their views. The primary purpose of the movement was,however,to create a safe haven for Jews. Do you know how and why Hertzel decided to create the movement? Do you know why most of the support they had came from Poland and Russia? Go learn some history then we’ll talk.

    in reply to: Akuperma re: "mere annoyance" #957143
    mdd
    Member

    HaKatan, I’m sorry to tell you that the old Brisk accusation that the sole purpose of Zionism is to shmad Yidden has nothing to do with reality.

    Secondly, it is the cavalier attitude of Akuperma that revolts many here. Get it?

    in reply to: Akuperma re: "mere annoyance" #957127
    mdd
    Member

    Yea, HaKatan, if one soldier gets killed in in the IDF, you and your ilk go positively crazy with anti-Zionist rhetoric. In golus, however, if Jews died in their thousands or worse, who cares much? Right?

    in reply to: Akuperma re: "mere annoyance" #957125
    mdd
    Member

    Nfgo3, Parshas Ki Savo and Bechukoysai speak of the Holocaust, but I agree that his cavalier attitude towards the Yiddishe tzoros is very wrong!

    in reply to: Akuperma re: "mere annoyance" #957122
    mdd
    Member

    Derech HaMelech, get it through your head: It is not an inborn unalienable right of the Israeli Chareidim to stay in kollel forever on the Israeli taxpayers’money. To compare the denial of that “right” to the Shaoh is an outrage. Many of the Akuperma’s post are outrageously off!

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955616
    mdd
    Member

    HaKatan, stop your lies!! Forget about 1937, etc. Agudah Gedolim who are a clear majority do not go by your extreme Satmar/Brisk shittos. Your dreing is outrageous!

    Again, HaKatan has no answers!!!

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955611
    mdd
    Member

    It is outrageous that HaKatan continues with his lies and distortions. Namely, he tries to ignore the fact that most Gedolim do not hold like Brisk/Satmar.

    HaKatan has no answers!

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955593
    mdd
    Member

    And let him not speak of cheap pot shots. They are as cheap as his propaganda.

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955592
    mdd
    Member

    HaKatan still insists that 2+2=9. Anybody agreeing? Where is Joe(About Time)?

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955591
    mdd
    Member

    About Rav Gifter — total baloney -propaganda.

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955572
    mdd
    Member

    Just Emes, stop wasting time with HaKatan and he’ll go away (to Kiryas Yoel).

    DM, Rav Shach did not hold that the medinah and IDF must be disbanded as the NK holds.

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955559
    mdd
    Member

    HaKatan, you’d hold that 2+2=9 if that’s needed for your anti-Zionist views.

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955558
    mdd
    Member

    Rav Moshe held it was ok because the UN gave reshus.

    HaKatan, according to your logic, the opinions of the Rov and the Satmar Rebbe don’t count — they were anti-Zionists.

    Chacham Ovadia and Shas are official memebers of WZO. If they did not hold of Zionism why they would be there?

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955535
    mdd
    Member

    Just Emes, +1.

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955531
    mdd
    Member

    HaKatan, Chacham Ovadya and the Shas are official membres of the World Zionist Organisation Need I say more? I guess I do. What’s the weather like in Teheran? Going together with Joe and daniella to meet Achmenadjad to discuss the evil of Zionism? I’ll bet he’ll agree with you folks. Have a nice time there!

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955520
    mdd
    Member

    ROB, +1.

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955519
    mdd
    Member

    HaKatan, and I presume that you on purpose viciously drei the kup.

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955517
    mdd
    Member

    HaKatan, I truly hate when you and your friend Joe drei the kup. The Agudah Gedolim and non-Satmar Rebbes were not Zionists, but they did not hold of your extreme Satmar/Brisk shittah.

    ZD is right on the money with his Reb Ya’akov story. Even the Satmar Rebbe was forced to admit there were miracles, but he attributed them to the Sotan. Reb Ya’akov disagreed.

    The Agudah Gedolim and the non-Satmar Rebbes have not been spewing the extreme hate of Israel as you do. Enough already!!!

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955506
    mdd
    Member

    Stop harping about the Rov and Reb Elchonan, what about others?!?

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955505
    mdd
    Member

    HaKatan!!!The Agudah Gedolim and most of the Rebbes did not hold like that!! Don’t you dare pretend it never happened!

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955494
    mdd
    Member

    Just Emes, +1

    in reply to: Pushing off Geirim #954019
    mdd
    Member

    Sam2, what you wrote is outrageous! That Gemorah never meant that we should not accept Geirim. Look in the last 2 lines in Reb Daniel’s post. I do agree with him.

    PBA, I have never seen a weird Ger and I’ve seen a fair amount of them. Plus, as Mamele pointed out “weird” does not equal “insincere” or “bad”. I do not know if there is a high rate of them lapsing, but whatever cases there are they probably, at least, in part caused by the way they are treated.

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955490
    mdd
    Member

    HaKatan, this is our outrageous! Rav Ya’akov Kamenetzky, Rav Moshe and other Agudah Gedolim did not hold like that. Neither do the Chassidim except for Satmar. Stop the obfuscation!

    in reply to: Talking during davening #1117195
    mdd
    Member

    Yussel, there is a chiyuv to stop aveiros from being done if possible.

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955485
    mdd
    Member

    ZD, Austria is not Germany. Find out more then we’ll talk.

    in reply to: Talking during davening #1117187
    mdd
    Member

    Sam2, it might be not so proper, but I am not sure it is ossur — Islam is not an avodah zorah.

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955483
    mdd
    Member

    ZD, the last thing the Austrian Germans want is more Jews over there.

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955474
    mdd
    Member

    ZD, there’s a draft there.

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955472
    mdd
    Member

    Just as a P.S.: HaKatan, just because they say something in Brisk, it does not mean it is emes min ha’Shomaim. Why don’t they try moving back to Poland or Russia if it is that bad in Israel?

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955471
    mdd
    Member

    HaKatan, I disagree with your extreme view. And let’s end the argument. I do not concede defeat though by any means.

    in reply to: Talking during davening #1117170
    mdd
    Member

    Sam2, Islam is not an avodah zorah.

    Syag le’chochmah, people who do bad things are bad. That’s the emes al pi Torah. Maybe, some people these days can not accept this, but that is the truth.

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955465
    mdd
    Member

    HaKatan, secular Zionism is kefirah. I agree.

    The 3 Shvuos — there are shittos about it. Ein ze mkoma shel sugya zu.

    Rock throwing? How about not being able to wear a yarmulke in the street in many European countries for fear of attack? I am not even talking about a black hat. In Israel, you could do it.

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955463
    mdd
    Member

    HaKatan, your hilukim about the shelters and missiles are shvach. Anyhow, stop falsifying the shittos of the Gedolim. They did not held like the Brisker Rov and the Satmar Rebbe!It seems like no matter what arguments I present, you’ll keep on repeating your propaganda. Enough already!

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955456
    mdd
    Member

    Plus, about the missile shields etc. Do us a favor, drei nit ken kup. The US and Russia have missile shields. Russia also has a border fence. So?

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955455
    mdd
    Member

    HaKatan,again, I do not say that the Zionists were right. What I am saying is that after objectively looking at all the circumstances, your position should not have been so extreme and vicious. Most Gedolim do not hold like Brisk and Satmar. 3 Oaths is also not so simple at all as you present it. Just because you push the Satmar shittah it does not become the only pshat.

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955448
    mdd
    Member

    Shelters? Have you heard of pogroms? It did not mean some anti-Semites throwing two stones through the window. It meant murder, maiming, bnos Yisroel assaulted etc. All of these on a massive scale. Have you heard of anti-Semitic laws in the Russian Empire and the persecution in Poland and other places. Of daily persecution in Europen countries? Do not pretend it never happened!

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955447
    mdd
    Member

    HaKatan, stop harping about the shmad and those killed. Had they stayed in Russia, Poland, Hungary etc., they would have been either shamded or killed or faced oppression from the Goyim there. You and your freinds keep your head in the sand about it. It was the the European anti-Semitism which caused Zionism. Stop pretending it was just some crazy idea which appeared out of nowhere!

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955440
    mdd
    Member

    ZD, I meant people who came right before the war when I wrote “1930s”.

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955438
    mdd
    Member

    So, ZD? What’s your point? I know keeping people from going off the derech is of no value to you.

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955436
    mdd
    Member

    ZD, you are wrong. The Yiddishkeit was rebuilt from the more frum Europen refugees of late 1930s and 1940s. Without their influx, the Gedolim would not be able to do anything. They needed a frume olam. The previous wave Jews were mostly irrevocably lost.

    AviK, nobody coulld have known that before the fact.

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955429
    mdd
    Member

    And why, Katan, the economy could be good in the Zionist state?

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955428
    mdd
    Member

    Saving lives al pi Torah. You are not really right. Dovid ha’Melech went to war after not big provocations.

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955427
    mdd
    Member

    Baloney, Katan.The reason I mentioned Russia and France is because you can’t walk the street in a yarmulke there.

    I am not saying the Zionists are right. It is just your viciousness and unobjectivity annoy me. Take a chill pill. Stop listening to the Brisk/Satmar shittos so much.

    in reply to: The Dov Lipman Response�Controversial? #955425
    mdd
    Member

    ROB, I was not talking about staying in kollel. I was talking about staying frum.

    HaKatan, just because you stridently, with great gall spew your propaganda, it does not make you right. Obviously, all those Russian and French Jews who have been running to Israel think it is safer there.

Viewing 50 posts - 351 through 400 (of 1,759 total)