Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Shlit”a or dead — it is not apikorsus, just stupidity.
Apushatayid, I was talking to the Pashute Yid.
Jothar, re-read the letter. It is clear that it is stupid to believe that the Rebbe is the greatest Gadol among the dead, but it is not apikorsus. The Gemora is clear that Daniel (whose is dead) could be Moshiach.
Pashute Yid, it is precisely the misunderstanding of Kabbola statements like this, that led some Lubavitchers, Shabsi Tzvi talmidim, and talmidie oso Ish off the derech. This is wherein the problem lies!
Jothar, Gemora says Moshe Rabbeinu and Ya’akov Avinu never died.
Adding more chumros is wrong — you do not want to drive more people off the derech (completely or partially).
Apashuteyid, do you think it is kind of questionable for a leader of one group to take on the title of the leader of the whole generation?
Yitay, same about your svora.
Sam, according to you logic, women should be allowed to walk in street in bigdei pritzus, c^v. Rachmona litzlan me’data didach.
Mod 80, the heterim, you mentioned, are not really strong heterim. They are more of a limud zechus on the makilim. The Gemora should have mentioned that all married men are potur from sleeping in the sukka.
I am here, your family lives in the US?
Chacham, other Achronim. Look in MB.
The Hashgoha is there, but we must act resposibly.
Pashtus, it is a shaila of “ein podim shevuim yoser al kdei d’meihem” — “we do not redeem kidnapped people for more than a regular price”. I do not know how it would apply here.
Ridiculous comparison.
Sam2, it is clear that even the etzem fact of showing up in public overly-mekushetes(wearing a tone of make-up etc.) was a problem. Secondly, how do you see from the Abba Chilkiya ma’ase that his wife was very mekushetes?
Health, look at my post. Long sheitel is, pashtus, very mekushetes.
Sam2, look at the beginning of Yeshaya about the Bnos Tzion and the Gemora’s elaboration on it in Ba’ma Ha’Isha in Shabbos. It is a problem for a married woman to appear in public overly mekushetes.
Avodah hatemima in perek Taharah. Dveikus in perek Chelkei ha’Chassidus.
“Mesilas Yeshorim” explains the terms it uses.
“Pele Yoetz”.
Old man, it sounds like the Shabsi Tzvi shittos. Baruch HaShem, the Misnagdim opposed them.
Tickle toe(Joseph), you are running out of names, if you had to take on ” tickle toe…”.
Coffee addict, who told you Yehudis did anything there? She very well might have killed the general without doing an aveira.
PbA, it is not proper to say “I hate a parsha”.
Sam2, I do not know about “many people”, but there is definetly such a problem.
Gumball, it says in the Gemora that if a person davens for something, even if it is not good for him, HaShem might give it to him just because he is asking.
Bezalel, it does not fit at all.
Gog is the leader of Magog. A whole coalition of nations (mostly from the North) is going to come fight against the Jews of Eretz Yisroel.It is in the Nevi’im.
Sam2, that is also ossur.
And Yeshaya says that his(Moshiach’s) arrival will be accompanied by “shever poshim”.
Sam2, THE POSUK SAYS:” U’mi eikalkel yom bo’o, u’mi ha’omed be’heraoso” (And who will (be able to) bear the day of his coming, and who will stand when he is revealed). I think it is in Malachi.
The Zohar says there is going to be a makka to kill all those who do not want him to come.
Puritans?
Wake up.
Shprintze, I did not get your post – it sends mixed signals.
Sam2, 1) how do you know about the “repression” and “whims”? The NY Times? 2)it is still closer then “do you what you want”.
Yichusdic, we have to know what’s right and not praise or condone what’s wrong. Dina de’malchusa does not override the Torah.
Raphael Kaufman, I second Tums.
Raphael, do you also approve of toeiva marriage?
Raphael, they are right about enforcing tznius and morality. For the debauched Westerners that’s the worst thing. And do not mix in here the anti-Israel shitos — I was not talking about that. What did you see in Va’eschanan? And again: Torah, not NY Times. You’ve been so influenced, it is hard to talk to you.
Tzippi, check out the definition of “sanctimony”. And I hate leitzanus in the CR.
Yichusdic, you are wrong. We should go with the Hashkofas ha’Torah, not of the NY Times. We do not be’etzem beleive in the democracy, “human rights” shitos. Those shitos believe in allowing eberybody to do what they want, the Torah does not. The following might shock you and others: Saudi Arabia and Iran are by far closer to the Torah ideals than the West. Stop being influenced by the Western media.
Apashuteyid, stop making fun of “yoshon” as it were a joke. “Chodash” in chutz la’Aretz is ossur de’Oraisa according to most Rishonim. Not being makpid on it is a big, not-simple kula.
One needs to think about the best way to give either them or their relatives tochecha.
Raphael Kaufman, the customs and attitudes of non-Jewish America do not override the gidrei Tznius. Millions of women work in offices, and nothing happens? We know what’s going on by those asher einam-me’Bnei(Bnos) Yisroel heim!
Therealmgama, on the other hand, there is no issur of calling a woman by her first name, and that reaction was extreme.
I think it is a red flag.
Moderator, what would you expect from officially secular Jews?? Your and others outrage is puzzling! It is not like they were pretending to be frum, and then you caught them doing aveiros.
The only purpose for which the state was created was to serve as a refuge from antisemitism. They would have been just as frei without the Medina.
Rabbiofberlin. had there not been a state and HKB”H wanted a destruction, it would have happened even with the state. And had it not been for His miracles since its founding, the Jews of EY could have been destroyed a couple of times over(1948,1967, 1973 etc.).
Abelle, do you have any answer to my rayos?? Now,even if it is true that such a line was there ( of which I am by no means certain), it was written in some very specific context. If you want to claim that it is to be taken literally, then it is contradicted by numerous ma’amarei Chazal.
Health, you take the Satmar-Brisk shitos for an universal opinion. They are not.
Could you specify what would have been better had the Medina not been there?
Health, what shaychos?
Rav Elchonan said it about the Jewish Communists, not Zionists.
The obsession with the Medina and the distortions are truly amazing.
Mytake, why did Dovid HaMelech ever go to war? He should have sat and learnt.
Moderator 80, Zionists wanted to have a state where they thought they could be free from antisemitic persecution.Period. They could have been very frei without creating a state. I do not for a second believe that they were moseir nefesh for the Medina just to take others off the derech.
Rav Shach allowed the Frum parties to be part of the Government!!! Kefira?? Yehareg ve’lo’ya’avor??? Wake up!
Obaminator, you must realize that there are differences between what the Satmar Ruv held and what Chazon Ish held and what Rav Shach held and what the Brisker Rov held. It is very important to be well-informed about the shitos and about the metzios.
Health, only Satmar holds of your pshat.
Toi, I think that you are a troll in reality. Still, I’ll repeat: your claims are inaccurate and exaggerated and present a distorted picture.
Popa-bar-Abba, on a date one is allowed to look at a girl to see if he likes her as opposed to staring for pleasure. There is no purpose or heter to smell her perfume (pashtus).