mdd

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 901 through 950 (of 1,759 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: neturei karta sinks to new low praises alla #872286
    mdd
    Member

    Sam2 and others, it is a shvere shita to say that Islam is avoda zora. Alla just means God in Arabic. Do not create shailos.

    in reply to: Mixed Seating #877076
    mdd
    Member

    Zeeskite, denail is not a place in Egypt. A lot of times, by a lot of people, chumros lead to ga’avah and sinas chinom.

    in reply to: Mixed Seating #877073
    mdd
    Member

    Oomis1105, but you are right about the ga’avah and the sinas chinom.

    in reply to: Mixed Seating #877072
    mdd
    Member

    Oomis, look in “Mesilas Yeshorim”, chapters about prishus and chassidus.

    in reply to: Mixed Seating #877070
    mdd
    Member

    Zahavasdad, I did not say it was assur.

    Loyal Jew, all this staff that you said can not establish an issur. Go learn how Halocha works.

    in reply to: Mixed Seating #877065
    mdd
    Member

    Zahavasdad, please! I can find plenty of Gedolim who disagree with your shittos.

    A specific response: he never said it is not a ma’alah to do it. Others, for sure, hold it is better to have separate seating. It is also obvious (look at my previous posts).

    in reply to: Mixed Seating #877060
    mdd
    Member

    Oomis, it appears so from the choice of words of either Gemora or Rashi there. It also explains why that Gemora is not a proof to allow real dancing without mechitzah.

    As far as parading goes, it was not a problem — they were single girls in need of a shidduch.

    in reply to: Mixed Seating #877054
    mdd
    Member

    Loyal Jew, who made this issur?

    in reply to: Mixed Seating #877053
    mdd
    Member

    Oomis, they were walking-dancing in circles. It was not real dancing.

    in reply to: Mixed Seating #877047
    mdd
    Member

    I wanted to go to sleep, but…

    1) If one wants to hold by a higher madreigah, he needs to accept chumros. Source? “Mesilas Yeshorim”!

    2) Women may not dance when men see them.

    3) It is better to have a separate seating for the meal also. Especially, when some women are dressed-to-kill and the rest are quite mekushat.

    Separate seating is very needed by concerts. Otherwise, you would have men seating next to dressed-to-kill other men’s wives, and so close that one needs an effort to avoid negia. And sometimes the ladies begodim are not long enough either!

    in reply to: shomer nigia #901603
    mdd
    Member

    Also, Sam2, off-hand, the Gemora there implies that if she were married, it would be normative Halocha. Look in the Ran there.

    in reply to: shomer nigia #901602
    mdd
    Member

    Yihusdic and Sam2, if it was assur to do, then they were wrong. Do not bring emotions and wrong ones at that into determining Halochah!

    in reply to: shomer nigia #901586
    mdd
    Member

    Sam2, off-hand, look at the last omud in Ben Soreir u’Moire.

    Menucha12, it is already a Jewish history question. It is mainly because of the loss of observance and Torah knowledge in early years in America.

    in reply to: shomer nigia #901582
    mdd
    Member

    I agree with you that sometimes some people exagerate, and it is wrong. Having said that, in this case it is not an exageration — it is a halocha in Shulchan Aruch. What’s the p’shat? The explanation is as follows: doing negia with an erva makes a terrible stain on a Yid’s neshomah. So HaShem would rather he die then do it. Post factum,, it is not so terrible that a sanhedrin would be obligated to go after him and execute him.

    in reply to: shomer nigia #901577
    mdd
    Member

    Oomis1105, with all due respect, do not tell people like Sam2 to go re-read the Torah — he is at least somewhat of a Talmid Chochom, and you are not.

    The reason why a woman is not obligated to be killed to avoid being raped(chas^ve’sholom) is because she is considered to be an inactive participant. If someone puts a gun to her head and tells her to go do an active act of gilui arayos or negia, she is obligated to be shot and not do it.

    Also, negia is not a capital offence, but it is yehareg ve’lo’ yaavor. It is a clear din in Gemora and Shulchan Aruch.

    in reply to: shomer nigia #901562
    mdd
    Member

    Oomis1105, we go with the explanation of Chazal. The posuk, I brought, forbids negia derech ta’ava according to them. What Bp27 meant was that it is an unquestioned Halocha.

    ItcheSrulik, you are wrong. Most Rishonim hold it is min’Torah, and so we pasken. (And it is ossur to all arayos.)

    in reply to: shomer nigia #901554
    mdd
    Member

    Exlakewooder, it says in the parsha of arayos:”velo sikarvu legalos erva…”. This is the mekor. A pnuya, who became a nidda de’oraisa (when and how is a different shmuz), is an erva. Shulchan aruch paskens that all lavin of the 3 chamuros are yehareg ve’lo’yaavor.

    in reply to: shomer nigia #901546
    mdd
    Member

    Yungerman1, a Goy is not metzuve on this.

    in reply to: shomer nigia #901540
    mdd
    Member

    Sam2, what I mean is that in the case of a Jewish woman shaking hands with a Goy, we should have if not a total assumption then at least a very strong chashash that he is doing it with chibah in mind. Therefore, when she does it, she basically allows herself to be touched for chibah purposes.

    Shticky shlo, chibah means affection.

    in reply to: shomer nigia #901537
    mdd
    Member

    Sam2, are you serious? According to you, a Jewish lady is allowed to let someone be nogea in her with intentions of chiba? Chas ve’sholom, lo tehey zos be’Yisroel!

    Shtiky shlo, it is spelled: “ches”, “yud”,”beis”,”hey”.

    in reply to: shomer nigia #901530
    mdd
    Member

    HaLevi, you are wrong. The answer depends on if it is considered derech chiba or not. And adaraba, when a Goy shakes a frum woman’s hand, I would be concerned about it being derech chiba. It does not have to do with the handshakes being a normal part of the protocol or not.

    in reply to: Should Oldest Son Inherit a Rov / Rebbe's Position? #866523
    mdd
    Member

    Sam, it is a machlokes Ramo and Chasam Sofer.

    in reply to: Matza Ashira cookies #866275
    mdd
    Member

    And Beis Yosef holds it is only “nochon”.

    in reply to: The Israeli Settlers #866280
    mdd
    Member

    Practically impossible.

    in reply to: Matza Ashira cookies #866270
    mdd
    Member

    His brother Rav Avraham said that everything there is kosher. And what about the 27 min., if it does not cause chimutz?

    I just looked in the M.B. and the Biur Halocha, and it is not poshut at all that it is a problem, and the Chofets Chaim matirs in many cases. Look there! Or in E. Yisroel, it is always lehachmir?!?

    in reply to: Asking Questions #866205
    mdd
    Member

    Fief un, the story with the Kollel is the same as with the Arba minim — there was not an opportunity. Now. ther is.

    Toi, see my previous post.

    in reply to: Asking Questions #866193
    mdd
    Member

    Sometimes, things are done in a certain way, and it is a shevere chumra or a shvere kula. And it was started in times of the Achronim. And it is not good to continue to do it.

    in reply to: Matza Ashira cookies #866267
    mdd
    Member

    Then what’s the deal with the 27 min.? Even a little bit is a problem.

    in reply to: Matza Ashira cookies #866265
    mdd
    Member

    It said the process takes 27 minutes, and it’s too long. If mei peros do not cause chometz, what’s the problem?

    Stam yenam? They use yain asher eino mevushal there??!?

    in reply to: Strobin vs. Fidler #861281
    mdd
    Member

    The Fidler guys’ smears and hits are absolutely disgusting and nauseating. Carefully calculated lies and misrepresentations.

    in reply to: Tachnun Calendar #861314
    mdd
    Member

    Itshe, there is a difference between adding a zach and being mevatel a zach.

    in reply to: MO wanna-bes #861212
    mdd
    Member

    Yid.period, in those days, “no choice” was peshuto ke’mashmo’o -otherwise they would be starving.

    in reply to: MO wanna-bes #861209
    mdd
    Member

    Yid.period, learning in the cheder till 10 might have happened (usually, for longer), but nobody held it was good — there was often no choice.

    Knowing science etc. is necessary to a degree. It is not equal to the Torah itself though. The Torah was given only to Klal Yisroel. We were commanded to learn it. Science — any Goy could learn it, if he wants.

    in reply to: Is An Amalekite Allowed to Commit Suicide? #941930
    mdd
    Member

    Moderators, it is not a good thread!!!!

    in reply to: Is An Amalekite Allowed to Commit Suicide? #941929
    mdd
    Member

    No, he is not. not his chiyuv.

    in reply to: MO wanna-bes #861205
    mdd
    Member

    More_2, it is like saying the Nevi’im should not have rebuked the Jews about the avodah zarah in times of Bais Rishon. The people should fix their middos before the Day of Final Reckoning arrives.

    in reply to: Is An Amalekite Allowed to Commit Suicide? #941926
    mdd
    Member

    An Amaleiki is bound by the issur of retzicha(suicide). Mechiyas Amaleik is not his mitsva.

    in reply to: what do you think of daf yomi? #860776
    mdd
    Member

    Toi,not fartig!The Poskim in S.A. say that ba’alei batim who have only 3-4 hours to learn should learn Halocha le’ma’ase, and not only Gemora. Everyone, including bnei Torah, must know Halocha in order to know what to do! You can’t be yotzei just with boich pilpulim in the Reb Chaim’s chidushim!

    in reply to: Sandra Fluke and Rush #858075
    mdd
    Member

    Squeak, I think what he did was o.k. He called a spade a spade. He called a lowlife a lowlife.

    in reply to: Are You Part of the 80%? #882185
    mdd
    Member

    Logician , he was not a bigger rasha than many Tanach and Second Beis HaMikdash reshoim. Btw, Ramo holds it is muttar for a Goy to be a Notzri.

    in reply to: Are You Part of the 80%? #882180
    mdd
    Member

    Logicia, what’s so wrong with oso ish? It was Paul who got it really rolling. Besides, neither killed anybody.

    in reply to: Are You Part of the 80%? #882179
    mdd
    Member

    Logician, there are numerous sources that the time of the Redemption is going to be a time of great judgement. May HaShem have mercy on the Yidden! The Zohar says there is going to be a makka to kill out those Jews who do not want Moshiach to come. “And who can bear the day of his coming, and who will stand when he is revealed…”(Malachi).

    Josh31, 80% of the Jews were killed during makas choshech.

    in reply to: Op-Ed Lies about Storobin #857455
    mdd
    Member

    HaLevi, not telling people what to do is not a Torah value.

    in reply to: Op-Ed Lies about Storobin #857450
    mdd
    Member

    The Goq, who cares if they know about it?? What’s the difference? We have our obligations and concerns (such as not allowing the society to get even more polluted)! Please, re-read my posts.

    in reply to: Op-Ed Lies about Storobin #857445
    mdd
    Member

    Goq,the Torah applies to the Goyim also — namely, the 7 mitsvos. It forbids them to do this aveira(which means, obviously, that they can avoid it). It provides for a death penalty for the violation. We are supposed to prevent them from doing it if we could. It also affects the society we live in.

    in reply to: Op-Ed Lies about Storobin #857439
    mdd
    Member

    The Goq, “Live and let live” is a possule American liberal concept. It is totaly against the Torah. If we had the power,it would be our obligation to prevent even the Goyim from violating the 7 mitsvos.

    in reply to: Eating at peoples houses with teenage daughters? #984124
    mdd
    Member

    Wolf, it is not the place to discuss those types of Halohos, Squeak just meant to show that the Loyal Jew’s statement is preposterous.

    in reply to: Mechitza at the Siyum HaShas #854473
    mdd
    Member

    Cherrybim, you are so wrong! The Beis HaMikdash did have a mechitza — during Simchas Beis HaShoeva when many women came. That mechitza is the mekor for having a mechitza in shuls or at simchos (even if women do not dance).

    in reply to: Mechitza at the Siyum HaShas #854454
    mdd
    Member

    Loyal Jew, mixed buses are mutar. Rav Moshe held that cholov stam is muttar.

    Rabbiofberlin, look in Yad Moshe to find where it is. Btw, by meals, if the women are not dancing, it is only a ma’alah — not a chiyuv. An important ma’alah, though, considering how mekushtos so many women are.

    in reply to: Mechitza at the Siyum HaShas #854447
    mdd
    Member

    According to Rav Moshe, any event open to the general public (as opposed to “by invitation only”) needs a mechitza.

Viewing 50 posts - 901 through 950 (of 1,759 total)