mdd

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 751 through 800 (of 1,759 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Shave head #1099018
    mdd
    Member

    Chatzizah be’tvilah is a problem because it creates a hefsek between the guf and the water. Hair should not be a chatzizah as it is a part of the guf. There is no din that it has to be on the shaved head.

    in reply to: Litvishe Gedolim respecting Chasiddishe Gedolim #894171
    mdd
    Member

    Shmoel,I do not know about the Sefardim, but about the other 2 — yeno ho nami.

    in reply to: Shave head #1099016
    mdd
    Member

    Sam2, I expected better from you. Learn Y.D.198!

    2cents and RebRY, the Zohar is in Parshas Nasso. The chatitza shaving is in the Achronim. One of the reasons is since it is minhag to shave then…

    Nechamah and Mammele, women head-shaving is disgusting. This is what we mandate for eshes yafas toar to make her repulsive in the eyes of her Yiddishe chosan.

    in reply to: Litvishe Gedolim respecting Chasiddishe Gedolim #894168
    mdd
    Member

    Shlishi, if someone “has different shittos” it means that he holds that the other person is wrong!

    in reply to: Litvishe Gedolim respecting Chasiddishe Gedolim #894167
    mdd
    Member

    Chazon Ish was a major Misnaged.

    in reply to: Litvishe Gedolim respecting Chasiddishe Gedolim #894159
    mdd
    Member

    Kozov, a person who knows Sheimos can perform miracles. If he is a choshuve Yid who does it le’shem Shamaim, he will be left alone. Otherwise, it may work beshas ma’ase, but he is going to get punished afterwards.

    in reply to: Shave head #1099005
    mdd
    Member

    The Zohar does not say to cut the hair, it just talks about not showing it. They cut it to make sure it does not show. Before the advent of the fancy sheitels female shaving was a problem of making the wife unappealing in the eyes of her husband.

    Chazizah for tefilin? Please, learn Hilchos Chatzizos in Y.D.198, you’ll see it is not really a problem.

    in reply to: Litvishe Gedolim respecting Chasiddishe Gedolim #894144
    mdd
    Member

    Lita has two parts: Lita(Lithuania) proper and Belarus(White Russia).

    in reply to: Litvishe Gedolim respecting Chasiddishe Gedolim #894143
    mdd
    Member

    To be fair, Belarus was the biggest component of Lita. Chofets Chaim lived in Belarus.

    in reply to: Litvishe Gedolim respecting Chasiddishe Gedolim #894141
    mdd
    Member

    Englishman, I think it’s in the ha’kdomah to the “Kol kisvei Chofets Chaim”.

    in reply to: Litvishe Gedolim respecting Chasiddishe Gedolim #894138
    mdd
    Member

    Chofets Chaim said that the Chassidim have a number of pe’shoim, but their ahavas HaSHem covers them over.

    in reply to: Would Rabbi Akiva Eiger z"l wear a "kippa sruga"?so why do you?? #892081
    mdd
    Member

    Shlishi, please, do ask the alter Lakewooders! It is true that Reb Aharon held that some Rebbes were very choshuve Yidden, but he very strongly disagreed with the Chassidishe shittos.

    in reply to: Would Rabbi Akiva Eiger z"l wear a "kippa sruga"?so why do you?? #892074
    mdd
    Member

    Englishman and Kozov, ask alter Lakewooders if Reb Aharon was a Misnaged.

    in reply to: Would Rabbi Akiva Eiger z"l wear a "kippa sruga"?so why do you?? #892070
    mdd
    Member

    Englisgman, the reason why Litvishe Gedolim do not fight them so much is because they feel that that’s not the biggest problem facing Klal Yisroel now, and we can afford to have a fight within the frum camp these days, and we do not have enough koach to win.

    in reply to: Would Rabbi Akiva Eiger z"l wear a "kippa sruga"?so why do you?? #892068
    mdd
    Member

    Kozov, take it easy. Eventhough, the current Litvishe Gedolim do not fight the Chassidim so much, it does not mean that they do not object to a number of their shittos. Mofsim do not prove much — somebody needs to know the Sheimos and be choshuv enough and do it le’shem Shamaim. It does not mean that he is right about all of his shittos.

    in reply to: Would Rabbi Akiva Eiger z"l wear a "kippa sruga"?so why do you?? #892049
    mdd
    Member

    Yidyid,they did not want to be Yids — they wanted to be Bnei Yisroel.

    in reply to: Would Rabbi Akiva Eiger z"l wear a "kippa sruga"?so why do you?? #892048
    mdd
    Member

    Proud Hungarian, they held that the black-clad Hungarians and others were wrong in their approach. And the truth is that the Tanoim did not look like Satmar chassidim. Do not start counting from mid-19 century — Klal Yisroel is much older than that.

    in reply to: Can anyone explain going to Uman? #890184
    mdd
    Member

    Shlishi, double-check the sources.

    in reply to: Can anyone explain going to Uman? #890176
    mdd
    Member

    Mamin, “live and let live” is a posul, non-Torah principle.

    Shlishi, Ramban held le’ma’ase not to do it and even not to talk about it.

    Women going to Ukraine? It is an unsafe, anti-Semitic country.

    in reply to: Who says above knee osur #1022294
    mdd
    Member

    Yittai, look in Igros Moshe. He openly states the chiluk I mentioned.

    in reply to: Who says above knee osur #1022293
    mdd
    Member

    Yittai, they said it concerning ervah minhagis — hair of a married woman, not about wearing mini-skirts and low-cut dresses.

    And any red-bloodied man will tell you that one does get used to and becomes unaffectable by the ladies dressed in the abovementioned fashion.

    Your shittos sound like the YU, not like the BMG.

    in reply to: Who says above knee osur #1022292
    mdd
    Member

    It is for sure true as far as hirhurim go. GAW, speak to Rabbi Forst of Far Rockaway.

    Yeshayhu Ha’Novi (and the relevant Gemora) castigated married women of his time for dressing and acting in certain ways(which were meant to attract the attention of men).

    in reply to: Who says above knee osur #1022284
    mdd
    Member

    Whatever Rabbeinu Yonah says in “Sha’arei Te’shuvah” is his halochic opinion.

    in reply to: Who says above knee osur #1022275
    mdd
    Member

    Yittai, also look in Sotah 3A, Rashi there on the shitta of Rabi Akiva. He explains that if someone hates pritzus, it means a spirit of purity entered that person. Ehi ratzon you should be zoche le’kach.

    in reply to: Who says above knee osur #1022274
    mdd
    Member

    Yittai, please, stop confusing the olam here with the shvere das-yechid/minority shitta that we do not pasken like. You may be causing people to be nichshol.

    Generaly speaking, we had this discussion already. In many areas of Halochah, you can find shvere shittos (lenient or strict) that we do not pasken like. You can matir 3/4 of the Shulchan Aruch like that.

    in reply to: Who says above knee osur #1022273
    mdd
    Member

    GAW, Rabbeinu Yonah, off hand.

    Yittai, do not go there. I know all the reid you are going to say — most Poskim do not hold like that. So, stay in YU and tell the ladies there to get dressed.

    P.S.: I do not wish to enter here into a full-blown discussion of the sugya — the cr is not the place for it for a number of reasons.

    in reply to: Who says above knee osur #1022268
    mdd
    Member

    Most Poskim hold and any regular man understands that certain parts cause hirhurim even if many women are accustomed to reveal them.

    As far as your “common sense” svorah goes, look in Brochos 24A and in Rashi there — it is befeirush not like you said.

    in reply to: Who says above knee osur #1022266
    mdd
    Member

    Yitay, a woman is obligated to be dressed tzniusdic so as not to cause men to stumble as far as hirhurim( and histaklus) are concerned.

    in reply to: Who says above knee osur #1022265
    mdd
    Member

    Sam2, Yitay…, Reb Moshe writes that only tights without a skirt is not enough as a woman “dressed” that way still causes hirhurim. Btw, look up Brochos 20A about pritzus.

    in reply to: Shaas Shmad in Israel #887553
    mdd
    Member

    Ohr chodesh,some hold that anything Gedolim say is all pi ruach ha’kodesh, and it is not possible for them to be wrong. According to that opinion, it’s a big kasha.

    in reply to: Shaas Shmad in Israel #887547
    mdd
    Member

    Rabbiofberlin, the argument about Palestine is as follows. Some fellows claim it was a gross blunder on the part of the Gedolim not to tell people to go to E. Yisroel. Chocandpatience answered to that that Rommel almost got there, and the Jews of E.Yisroel were saved at the last second.

    Again,the danger of Hitler did not become totaly apparent till 1938.

    in reply to: Shaas Shmad in Israel #887538
    mdd
    Member

    To be fair, the State did provide a refuge for the Jewish people where they could live proudly as Jews. Maybe, some of the fierce anti-Zionists want to go and live in Russia where it is dangerous to walk the streets with a yarmulke on. The truth is that it was all the persecution in Europe which caused the creation of the Zionist movement and the support it has had among the Jewish people.

    in reply to: Shaas Shmad in Israel #887535
    mdd
    Member

    Choppy, you are right — once there is a psak from the Great Sanhedrin. However, some here claimed that they could not possibly make a mistake.

    in reply to: Shaas Shmad in Israel #887533
    mdd
    Member

    mw13, Kvodo shel Rabbi Desler be’mkomo munach, the Gemora at the beginnig of Horiyos states that a Sanhedrin can make a mistake.

    in reply to: Shaas Shmad in Israel #887528
    mdd
    Member

    Zahavasdad, wrong! Ye, the Jews needed incomes, but going to the US meant otd and no olam habah. Needing incomes does not matir aveiros! Sending over some Gedolim would not have helped — there were tremendous nisyoynons with keeping Shabbos. Also,some people just wanted to go off the derech.

    The ta’anah about the Holocaust is preposterous. Nobody could have known what was going to happen untill it was to late.

    in reply to: Shaas Shmad in Israel #887525
    mdd
    Member

    Zahavasdad, I am not saying a Godol can not make a mistake, but the proof from the emigrarion shailah is not a good one.Going to America since the end of 19-th century till mid 20-th one was a trip to otd and losing olam habah, if not for the person himself, then for his children. The situation in Europe did not become obviously dangerous till 1938. The mass immigration to the US was ended by the 1924 act of Congress.Till 1938, according to what was seen, the psak was the right psak. It is easy to speak now after we see what happened — they did not know it would. In E.Yisroel, the Yidden needed miracles (and they got them) in 1942 and in 1948, and in 1967, and later. It is good they got them. It could have gone differently, though.

    in reply to: Dying Al Kiddush Hashem #886347
    mdd
    Member

    Sam2,”Behold, in his holy ones He believes not…” — Din can be very strict. I do not have time to bring proofs now.

    in reply to: Dying Al Kiddush Hashem #886342
    mdd
    Member

    Oomis, we do not assume about a rasha that he did teshuvah. Just the mere fact of his violent death brings him, at least, a partial kaporah.

    in reply to: Dying Al Kiddush Hashem #886341
    mdd
    Member

    O.K.Sam2, I do not think they meant to do an aveirah. They had some heter in their minds.

    HaLevi, you mixed up the Gemoras. There is a Gemorah that says about two people who volunteered to die to save Klal Yisroel that “no creature can approach their place”. It does not say it about the harugei Beitar.

    Yichusdic, the mishnah talks about famous Tanach people.There could be others.

    Coffee addict,Gemorah says he gets kaporah. I guess, issurim mechaprim. On the other hand, we say kaddish for him. It follows that not always such a person goes straight to Gan Eden. If he did not have the right kavonos, it for sure makes sense.

    in reply to: Dying Al Kiddush Hashem #886326
    mdd
    Member

    rabbiofberlin, the rayah is not good.Do not compare their shogeg to other people’s meizid.

    in reply to: Dying Al Kiddush Hashem #886325
    mdd
    Member

    Naftush, there are ofene sugyos about these things. Do not delegate it to the Beis din shel ma’alah. Yichusdic, the person’s kavonah makes a difference as to how much kaporah he gets.

    in reply to: Dying Al Kiddush Hashem #886315
    mdd
    Member

    Kozov, I am sorry I did not understand your question.

    in reply to: Dying Al Kiddush Hashem #886309
    mdd
    Member

    His violent death provides a full or a partial kaporah for him.

    in reply to: Shaas Shmad in Israel #887437
    mdd
    Member

    Toi, you have not yet answered my question about Rav Kook and Rav Y.B. Soloveichik who knew kol ha’Torah kulah!

    in reply to: IDEA: Let the 100,000 attendees at the Siyum Hashas #884899
    mdd
    Member

    Getzel1, what shayhos?

    in reply to: what is your worst language? what's ur favorite? #1006500
    mdd
    Member

    Ohr chodesh and company, just because you were taught that Yiddish is a special Jewish language, Germans did not lose the ability to understand it (except for the Hebrew and Slavic words). It is a dialect of German after all. Some Jews were able to spy on the Nazis during the war because they knew Yiddish.

    in reply to: what is your worst language? what's ur favorite? #1006486
    mdd
    Member

    I hate German. It’s alleviated a little bit by Yiddish being a dialect of it.

    in reply to: IDEA: Let the 100,000 attendees at the Siyum Hashas #884889
    mdd
    Member

    Honestly, it is not bellow me to argue with the distortion of the Torah.

    in reply to: what is your worst language? what's ur favorite? #1006483
    mdd
    Member

    I said “pretty much limited”. And with the Arabs, it’s a recent thing. And they want just to destroy the state. And they are big mouths – they do not 100% mean everything they say.

    in reply to: IDEA: Let the 100,000 attendees at the Siyum Hashas #884884
    mdd
    Member

    Choppy, it does not mean that the Sanhedrin is indeed right. Itjust means that you have a chiyuv to follow them even though they are wrong. However, you need a Sanhedrin for that. Besides, if a Rov paskens a shailah, and you know he is wrong, you can not follow him.

Viewing 50 posts - 751 through 800 (of 1,759 total)