mdd

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 451 through 500 (of 1,759 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: If this is what we've been waiting 2000 years for… #1073690
    mdd
    Member

    My point is “ki’lo machshevoysay machshevoseychem…”.

    in reply to: If this is what we've been waiting 2000 years for… #1073683
    mdd
    Member

    PBA, this is what I meant — it’s a part of G-d’s plan.

    in reply to: If this is what we've been waiting 2000 years for… #1073678
    mdd
    Member

    PBA, I do not have the time now to bring all the sources. Btw, I hope you know what Chazal said at the end of Sotah about the Ikvesa de”Meshicha. And about the frei country, the Moshiach himself comes from ma’ase Yehudah ve”Tamar, Lot and his daughters, Dovid and Bat Shevah and so forth.

    in reply to: If this is what we've been waiting 2000 years for… #1073671
    mdd
    Member

    PBA, it is Talmidei Chachomim who know — from ma’amorei Chazal and later Gedolim. Amazing how much you and others were indoctrinated by the Satmar and their fans!

    in reply to: If this is what we've been waiting 2000 years for… #1073666
    mdd
    Member

    The Medinah(despite the kavonos of the majority of its founders) is a nessecary step in the coming of the Moshiach process.

    in reply to: Are the Chasam Sofer hechsherim reliable? #946741
    mdd
    Member

    Shraga, be careful before you passel a heksher. Speak to a big Rov.

    in reply to: Is Israel bent on losing their protection? #943537
    mdd
    Member

    ROB, I do not much disagree with your last statement. There is, for sure, a point where it is impossible to support all those people in Kollel anymore and some of them have to go out and get a job. I am just not sure that it already has come to that,objectively speaking, or it is just that the non-Chareidi Israelis do not want to pay for all those people anymore. Plus, they are afraid that if they do not get them now, the Chareidim won’t go to work even when there is indeed no choice.

    in reply to: Is Israel bent on losing their protection? #943533
    mdd
    Member

    Just off hand, look in Kesubos 106A where Rav Yosef said that because of decrease in the number of talmidim in comparison to the generation of Elisha he can not daven for a yeshua. Look in perush Rashi on Yeshayah 10:27 that the salvation from Sancheriv came because of increase in limud ha’Torah. Look in Bava Basra 7B that talmidei chachomim are pturim from the defence taxes as their Torah protects them. There is a Gemorah or a Medrash I don’t remember where that one talmid chocham protects 40,000 others. There is a Gemorah in Shabbos, perek Be’ma Madlikin that Malach ha’Moves could not attack Dovid ha’Melech as long as he was learning. When you are done, come for more.

    in reply to: Carpathian Jewry #943903
    mdd
    Member

    Mamele, Prussian is German. North-Eastern German to be precise.

    in reply to: Is Israel bent on losing their protection? #943528
    mdd
    Member

    ROB, it is mefurash in numerous places that more learning bring s more protection. It is one thing to say that one can not impose on others if they do not want the zechusim, but you can not say that it does not matter if 100 people learn or 20,000 learn. Just as you can’t say it is all the same if 2 people gave $20 each to tzedokah or 1000 people gave $5000 each to tzedokah.

    in reply to: Is Israel bent on losing their protection? #943526
    mdd
    Member

    ROB, I did state that frum people could have aveiros for which gzeiros could come. Plus, again, your views are against open statements of Chazal.

    in reply to: Is Israel bent on losing their protection? #943515
    mdd
    Member

    Btw, about churban ha’Bais — the Gemorah specifically says about the frume that they had sinas chinom between themselves.

    in reply to: Is Israel bent on losing their protection? #943514
    mdd
    Member

    ROB, frum Jews also can have aveiros. Plus,do not twist the facts. During the middle ages and the tach ve’tat there were no frei Jews to speak of. Churban ha’Baiys — it is not like the frum got over the head and the tsedukim did not. The Shoah? Most of the Eastern European Jews were probably frei by that time and more were going otd by the day.

    in reply to: Is Israel bent on losing their protection? #943505
    mdd
    Member

    ROB, because of your very MO leanings, you choose to ignore the basic HaShkofos ha’Torah! Btw, “when kolo kol Ya’akov be’batei medrashos ve’batei knesios, ein ha’yadaim yedei Eisav…” — just to start. The ma’amorei Chazal are just too numerous to bring here! YES and YES, punishments come because of aveiros!! The Gemoros list which punishments come because of which aveiros.

    in reply to: Is Israel bent on losing their protection? #943504
    mdd
    Member

    ROB, I am not saying that only learning protects and it is full-proof — one has to keep other mitzvos proprerly too. The reason why the Gedolim did not insist on kollelim for everybody everywhere in previous doros is most simple — it was economically impossible. Only “koveya ittim” — not true, look in S.A Or.Chaim 156. Nobody has the answer about the Shoah — SHEKER!! Read the Tochechah in the Chumash and remember about the avalanche of otd in Europe. (Btw, about Germany, do not twist the facts! Like I said the otd German Jews were already 2,3,4,5th generations of otd – there is a limud zechus in that) One just has to be willing to see!

    in reply to: Is Israel bent on losing their protection? #943493
    mdd
    Member

    ZD, Gemorah in Shabbos says that a young city is more likely to be spared — less years of aveiros. Hence — US and England.

    in reply to: Is Israel bent on losing their protection? #943492
    mdd
    Member

    “Rabbi” of Berlin, I am basing myself on statements of Chazal!!! True, there were great Gedolim in Lithuania, but the rest were mostly off the derech. There was a lot of OTD already and more by the day in Poland. In Hungary – a lot of OTD,but a lot of Frum – no wonder threy were spared more. The Russian Jews were anusim. Again, no wonder — more survived. In Germany — they were OTD for doros – a limud zechus.

    And I saw a pshat that the reason for the peace of the Jews post WWII is the fact that the WWII was such a big blow that HKB”H has rachmanus even though there are aveiors in Israel and elsewhere.

    Sophistry?!? I am basing myself on divrei Chazal!!One of them — if a person sees suffering coming on him, let him check his deeds!

    in reply to: Is Israel bent on losing their protection? #943476
    mdd
    Member

    ROB, I would like to point out where you are wrong .

    1)There was not a lot of Torah in Lithuania and Poland in the 20-th centuary. There were a couple of yeshivos — a miniscule percentage of the general Jewish population. The people were going or already were off the derech in masse.

    2)If not for all the learning in golus, there would have been more pogroms. And in Spain s lot of Jews were busy learning philosophy and sciences instead of the Torah.Chazal said that the Torah protects and bittul Torah can bring on tzaros. We can not always know why things happen, but Chazal and later Gedolim would sometimes tie certain tzaros to certain aveiros.

    in reply to: Is Israel bent on losing their protection? #943460
    mdd
    Member

    Akuperma, it is Brisker slander.

    in reply to: Brainwashing as Part of Chinuch #1014295
    mdd
    Member

    SF, according to the conditions of our generations, it is a total necessity.

    in reply to: Brainwashing as Part of Chinuch #1014279
    mdd
    Member

    SF, actually “Pele Yoetz” was an advocate of women’s Torah education.The only possible real be’dieved is learning Chumash be’yiun.

    in reply to: Brainwashing as Part of Chinuch #1014272
    mdd
    Member

    Daas Yochid and the rest, what they mean is that some people in the BY system have distorted (not Torah-true) views. Usually, they are distorted in the right-wing direction. These distortions can be contradictory. And the talmidos are fed this stuff.

    in reply to: Jews Resisting the Zionist Draft #940387
    mdd
    Member

    Kwaiker(Joe), the parnossah mentioned in the Rambam’s havtochah is not squeezing money out of the unwilling public and causing a major Chillul HaShem. If the Israeli public did not mind, it would be fine.

    Sam2, we don’t pasken like that Rambam. Look in Hilchos Talmud Torah in Y.D., in the Shach there.

    in reply to: Jews Resisting the Zionist Draft #940384
    mdd
    Member

    I know it’s useless to argue with PBA and his friends, but for everybody esle’s info: Rambam did not hold that it applies to ganze Klal Yisroel. And if somebody wants to say otherwise, the S.A. for sure does not pasken like that (O.Ch. 156). Plus, how come the Rosh Yeshivos in Europe in the olden days were not telling everybody just to learn and not worry about parnossah?

    in reply to: Boycott of Meretz�Unfair!! #939827
    mdd
    Member

    Abra Cadabra, Satmar and Brisk lchod and the rest of Chareidim — lchod. Don’t falsify!!

    in reply to: Future of Israel's Orthodox Jews #941265
    mdd
    Member

    Yytz, see sefer “Chofets Chaim”.

    in reply to: Future of Israel's Orthodox Jews #941250
    mdd
    Member

    Takamamash, not judging is a Christian virtue. By Yidden, we judge — just according to certain rules.Look in the “Chofets Chaim”.

    in reply to: Boycott of Meretz�Unfair!! #939822
    mdd
    Member

    TKND, so if some Chareidim some place deside that they own all of Australia, that should be respected?

    in reply to: Future of Israel's Orthodox Jews #941242
    mdd
    Member

    AKUPERMA!!!So what in the world do you say??? That Chareidim can’t work and must be supported by everybody else any place they live? Are you for real?!?!?!?!?

    in reply to: Boycott of Meretz�Unfair!! #939820
    mdd
    Member

    Charliehall, what do you mean by Chareidi isolationism? Separation from the Umos and Reshoei Yisroel is mandated by TANACH and Gemorah in numerous places.

    in reply to: Boycott of Meretz�Unfair!! #939815
    mdd
    Member

    Ah Talmid(Joe), again you are with your lies! Refusal to serve because of learning would not be recognized as conciencious objection — we’ve been through this around here. Plus, Israeli Chareim get money from the medinah in many different ways.

    in reply to: Boycott of Meretz�Unfair!! #939807
    mdd
    Member

    TKND, get your facts straight. The only thing the government is planing to do is to cut the money flow to those refusing to serve. And even if they were planing to put them in jail — this is what countries do to draft-dodgers.

    in reply to: Jews Resisting the Zionist Draft #940353
    mdd
    Member

    abra Cadabra (JOE!),Stop lumping the names og the Gedolim together as if they were of the same opinion. I don’t know if Chofets Chaim was against Zionism.

    LF, yasher koach.

    in reply to: Boycott of Meretz�Unfair!! #939803
    mdd
    Member

    GAW, +1.

    in reply to: Chareidi Draft #939235
    mdd
    Member

    Nishtdayngwsheft, to be fair, they are going to patur 1,800 talmidim each year. Plus, nobody here would sponsor tens of thousands adults to learn(le’havdil) basket weaving or racial studies or anything for that matter.

    in reply to: Chareidi Draft #939229
    mdd
    Member

    Israeli Chareidi, if the government withdrew all the money the Chareidim get: funding to Yeshivos, subsidies to the poor etc., would the Chareidim be able to stay in learning? And I know, I know — some of those things are open to all Israelis, but, frankly, those other Israelis also do their duties as citizens. And I know — learning is a very great zechus, unfortunately the non-Chareidim don’t want to support all the Chareidim in learning anymore.

    in reply to: Boycott of Meretz�Unfair!! #939801
    mdd
    Member

    Joe,GDTHRYRHBEFWGHJYJTYJRJY!

    Secondly,my point is that the arguments have to be sound.You are not impressing anybody here with worthless arguments!

    in reply to: Boycott of Meretz�Unfair!! #939793
    mdd
    Member

    Joe, grow up. You’d say anything and quote anybody just to prove the Chareidim right.

    in reply to: Middah Kineged Middah? #941102
    mdd
    Member

    Besides, Kanoi, if they don’t stop the the Chareidim now, it will be impossible to do in the future because of their growing numbers. Even if 40% of the population were Chareidim and there were mamesh no choice but for the Chareidim to serve and work, I am afraid that the Israeli Chareidim are so unreasonable that they would not have gone to work and to serve.

    in reply to: Jews Resisting the Zionist Draft #940331
    mdd
    Member

    Exactly, LF. You can’t just say that the state would have for sure been a panacea — too many uncertainties and variables there. And then, again, remember the Gamorah in Pesochim.

    in reply to: Boycott of Meretz�Unfair!! #939791
    mdd
    Member

    He actually does – hence less ministers in the cabinet. Stop twisting things just to say that the Chareidim are right.

    in reply to: Boycott of Meretz�Unfair!! #939789
    mdd
    Member

    Because Lapid and others have to pay the bills for them. And even he agrees to patur the best talmidim. And the Chareidim hold that even those who can’t learn, should be in kollel

    in reply to: Jews Resisting the Zionist Draft #940328
    mdd
    Member

    Lakewood Fellow, the point is that to argue that had there been a state everything would have been great is a poor argument — too many things had to work out just the right way for the Yishuv to be safed. The arguments you are advancing are easy to refute. Hitler could have sent early on — before June 1941– a large force to capture E.Y or he would have sent the nessesary couple of divisions to help Rommel had there been more Jews there.

    in reply to: Middah Kineged Middah? #941098
    mdd
    Member

    The IDF brass says they can manage without them, but a lot of stam Israelis fell it is unfair for the Chareidim to be getting money from the State while refusing to do what (in their eyes) is a service to the State — the army duty, or contribute to the common basket by working. They agreee to free a large persentage from the army duty. They pay and they make the rules as to who get sthe money.

    The Govermnent says that if someone refuses to serve, he should not get the benefits (except for the 25% of masmidim). That is fair, reasinable and quite generous.

    in reply to: Boycott of Meretz�Unfair!! #939787
    mdd
    Member

    Very good, Kanoi. Working em masse is wrong according to the Israeli Chareidim!!!?!

    in reply to: Middah Kineged Middah? #941095
    mdd
    Member

    Kanoi, since you agree that it’s not an inborn right but rather a zechus, you have also to agree/understand that you may not force a zechus on somebody if they don’t want it.

    in reply to: Middah Kineged Middah? #941093
    mdd
    Member

    Health, you do not hold of the medinah, but you think that it has an absolute chiyuv to support the Chareidim in kollel. If they don’t hold of the medinah, let them go get a job. In E.Y. or otherwise.

    Maybe all frum Jews here in the US should drop their jobs and demand being supported?

    in reply to: Jews Resisting the Zionist Draft #940308
    mdd
    Member

    Charliehall, yasher koach! Probably, another 3-5 divisions would have been enough for Rommel. The Germans were almost there.

    in reply to: Jews Resisting the Zionist Draft #940299
    mdd
    Member

    Lakewood fellow, killing Yidden was a matter of high priority to the Nazis and they were moser nefesh to do it. They almost captured Eretz Yisroel. Had there been more troops there, they would have gotten to E.Y. Hitler would have for sure sent more troops if there had been a lot of Jews there. And the German army is a formidable enemy — they are not Arabs.

    in reply to: Jews Resisting the Zionist Draft #940275
    mdd
    Member

    The Gemorah in Pesochim says that Ribono shel olam did Yidden a favor by dispersing them — their enemies can’t get them in one place. Israel is good to avoid the day-to day persecution in peace time. During the WWII, the IDF would not have been able (derech ha’tevah) to stop the Wermacht.

Viewing 50 posts - 451 through 500 (of 1,759 total)