Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 8, 2015 5:55 pm at 5:55 pm in reply to: Just because it's ???? doesn't mean it's right #1090814☕️coffee addictParticipant
redleg,
yes
gadol aveirah lishma m’mitzvah shelo lishma
July 8, 2015 1:18 am at 1:18 am in reply to: question for democrats (and i guess anyone else that wants to chime in) #1145077☕️coffee addictParticipantnot sure which article you read i was referring to the article about chipotle in San Francisco which was the first article this morning which says exactly like i have been saying (for some reason i cant copy the article and paste it, not sure why (im on my phone so its not so easy as click and drag)
☕️coffee addictParticipantrebyidd,
i need to get THOSE numbers, someone that a cleaning lady trusts to clean their house while they’re away must be good and honest
☕️coffee addictParticipantif it was a treif restaurant i wouldn’t care
you know chinese people eat horse and dog meat?
July 7, 2015 11:13 pm at 11:13 pm in reply to: question for democrats (and i guess anyone else that wants to chime in) #1145075☕️coffee addictParticipantSo the answer to your question is it allowed the little people to survive I guess that can be called “helped”
are you sure they wouldn’t have survived if we didnt raise the minimum wage?
☕️coffee addictParticipantkarl,
you need to earn money to get eitc hence the ei in eitc
☕️coffee addictParticipantkosher or treif restaurant
July 7, 2015 8:29 pm at 8:29 pm in reply to: question for democrats (and i guess anyone else that wants to chime in) #1145073☕️coffee addictParticipantubequitin,
so now i ask you, the minimum wage has been increased more than once (we’ve already tried it out) has it worked by cutting profits to the BIG people or has it helped the little people?
☕️coffee addictParticipantJuly 7, 2015 6:27 pm at 6:27 pm in reply to: question for democrats (and i guess anyone else that wants to chime in) #1145070☕️coffee addictParticipantso basically it’s a machlokes and yeish al mi lismoch and the only way to really find out it is by trying it out on a large scale and see what happens
☕️coffee addictParticipant29,
i thought that was only jews that go to the catskills, not anywhere else
July 7, 2015 3:19 pm at 3:19 pm in reply to: question for democrats (and i guess anyone else that wants to chime in) #1145067☕️coffee addictParticipantbaruch shekevanti
there is a forbes article by tim worstall (never heard of him, but it says he’s an economist which says exactly like what i’ve been saying
July 7, 2015 3:04 pm at 3:04 pm in reply to: Best places to find honest, good cleaning help #1090647☕️coffee addictParticipantthere was a sign i saw at work this is what it said
i can do work fast good and cheap pick any two
if you want good and cheap it won’t be fast
if you want good and fast it won’t be cheap
if you want fast and cheap it won’t be good
take your pick
☕️coffee addictParticipantno you don’t froggie
:p
☕️coffee addictParticipantbh no one knows me (at least not that i know of) except yossi z
☕️coffee addictParticipantvery interesting,
why don’t you ask them?
July 6, 2015 10:48 am at 10:48 am in reply to: Just because it's ???? doesn't mean it's right #1090806☕️coffee addictParticipantisn’t there a passuk nahkee m’elokim u’m’adamm, that also says that too
July 6, 2015 10:32 am at 10:32 am in reply to: Just because it's ???? doesn't mean it's right #1090805☕️coffee addictParticipantok, now i get it
your hypothesis makes sense now
☕️coffee addictParticipantThe “avoda” of Tisha b’Av is to be Mis’abel on Yerushalayim and the Beis Hamikdash, and depending on who you are, the Shechina. Is that so terrible?
i’m not saying thats terrible, i’m saying why is that the avodah as opposed to trying to rectify the reason for the beis hamikdash being destroyed?
Just a note, although we obviously must learn the lesson of the Churban and avoid Sinas Chinam, that is not the pillar on which the third Bayis is built. Just like the second Bayis wasn’t based on Shalosh Chamuros, although they obviously had to do Teshuva on them.
i’m saying why aren’t we focusing on the teshuva
While it might be a very nice thing to setup safety standards after an accident ?”?, is that meant to replace Shiva?
so at the least have an add on to shiva, one of the avodas hayom should be to do chessed and have ahavas chinam
July 6, 2015 2:11 am at 2:11 am in reply to: Just because it's ???? doesn't mean it's right #1090803☕️coffee addictParticipantdo you have a source for this (is it the ramban it that parsha)?
☕️coffee addictParticipantdid they say tachnun?
July 5, 2015 11:26 pm at 11:26 pm in reply to: Just because it's ???? doesn't mean it's right #1090801☕️coffee addictParticipantcatch yourself
huh,
a case where its “achoso min ha’em” is if he married his mother therefore his daughter would be “achoso min ha’em”
July 5, 2015 11:22 pm at 11:22 pm in reply to: If you could only do one fun thing this summer….. #1090761☕️coffee addictParticipantrebyidd,
i thought you would say “carpet bomb all mosquitos”
☕️coffee addictParticipantme too
btw artichokes are kosher if you get the pickled artichoke form “season” the company, not the store or artichoke bottoms
☕️coffee addictParticipantwe did too
and i always have
where are you basing your generalaztion from?
July 5, 2015 8:19 pm at 8:19 pm in reply to: If you could only do one fun thing this summer….. #1090758☕️coffee addictParticipantfun?
pranking obama in as many ways possible
July 5, 2015 8:00 pm at 8:00 pm in reply to: Just because it's ???? doesn't mean it's right #1090797☕️coffee addictParticipantThe fact is that, as the Ramban (if I remember correctly) points out, Lot was halachically permitted to marry them, since they were not his maternal relatives.
they were his daughters, i don’t get your question
July 5, 2015 4:29 am at 4:29 am in reply to: Billam's Other Prophecy: The Deir Alla Inscription #1092413☕️coffee addictParticipanthaleivi,
acording to r yaakov reisman (in far rockaway/5 towns) they didn’t
according to somewhere else (can’t remember where) they got all haughty from the brachos so i guess they knew
☕️coffee addictParticipantthat really sucks
☕️coffee addictParticipantyes,
some cleaning ladies do
☕️coffee addictParticipantbabysitting most of the times is just them sitting around, cleaning is cleaning
from your op it sounded like you were asking about adults, now you’re talking about teenagers, teenagers don’t like to clean
☕️coffee addictParticipantbelow their pay grade
☕️coffee addictParticipantthe workers at my work clean it out
i was told its in fertilizer that’s why you clean it out
☕️coffee addictParticipant1) it was stupid because it’s not just Mexico, it’s all the south americain countries
2) i work with mexicains, and they are somewhat here illegally and they’re nice people that just want to earn a living like normal americains (this goes along with all other south americain countries)
☕️coffee addictParticipanthe/she isn’t trying, he/she is
☕️coffee addictParticipantwow
this thread brings back memories
thanks rebyidd
June 30, 2015 3:06 pm at 3:06 pm in reply to: Non religious argument against same sex marriage #1089765☕️coffee addictParticipantlol @ oot
(i didnt see your post before i posted)
June 30, 2015 3:05 pm at 3:05 pm in reply to: Non religious argument against same sex marriage #1089764☕️coffee addictParticipantdy
thats called taxation
June 30, 2015 1:43 pm at 1:43 pm in reply to: Non religious argument against same sex marriage #1089751☕️coffee addictParticipantdy,
how would you argue that stealing is ok?
i was think regarding the op’s question that people view the “t” part of lgbt is thought of as crazy, why is it any different than the “g”
June 30, 2015 10:47 am at 10:47 am in reply to: Calling Everyone You Disagree With a "Troll" or Someone Else #1165840☕️coffee addictParticipantwow, i totally forgot about this thread!
i stopped trying to call people out for trolling and try now to just live with the posts (i think the cr would be dead without them) i started to assume rebyidd was trolling, but couldn’t care that much anymore
☕️coffee addictParticipantlook what can of worms you opened up, rebyidd23
☕️coffee addictParticipantcharlie,
are you saying most orthodox jews voted for romney?
i hope you’re right
anyways i’m fine with people doing whatever they want for themselves however forcing people to accept it is totally different
☕️coffee addictParticipantmachlokesim need two people to argue so this thread is starting to be inapplicable :p
☕️coffee addictParticipantsam2,
as zdad put it
(in my own words how i understand zdad)
the government cant force you to marry someone off, however it can tell you what not to do
☕️coffee addictParticipanthealth (and others)
why doesnt this go against seperation of church and state
☕️coffee addictParticipantso great!
if i was single, yet i wanted to pay less taxes (more food stamps etc, receive medicare) all i would have to do is “marry” my sister?
☕️coffee addictParticipanti see what you mean, ubequitin
the word that was alluding me is “consenting” parties
you can’t have consent if they can’t give consent
however what is legally wrong with marrying one’s sister (what i meant originally when i said blood relatives)
☕️coffee addictParticipantubequitin, charlie, & zdad,
where does it say it is a union with another person?
people means a group of people not 2 spouses
☕️coffee addictParticipant127
was it something i said? i looked through the rules and don’t see a violation
if it was why did it get approved?
im confused here
☕️coffee addictParticipantor he was using his phone and it was on t9word
-
AuthorPosts