Matan1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 151 through 200 (of 434 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Showers in the 9 days #1093971
    Matan1
    Participant

    “Of course there are poskim to rely on to take a shower. But is that really what Hashem wants of us?”

    I can’t say for sure, but I imagine Hashem would want us to follow the halachic system, which allows us to shower during these days.

    in reply to: cats in my yard #1092443
    Matan1
    Participant

    Most cats are lactose intolerant. Giving them milk will only create a bigger mess.

    If you do want to feed the cats (which by the way, will almost guarantee that they will not go away), the best thing to do would be do by cat food at your local pet store.

    in reply to: iran bomb #1092810
    Matan1
    Participant

    Oomis, while I too disagree with the Iran deal, I doubt Obama is deserving of being charged with treason. I believe he is terribly misguided, but I do not think he has any malicious intent.

    in reply to: Cholov Yisroel and Gan Eden #1091545
    Matan1
    Participant

    Joseph, assuming both people were following their poskim, they get equal reward.

    in reply to: Chassidish/Heimish shatchanim #1091219
    Matan1
    Participant

    What qualifies someone as a heimish?

    in reply to: We really do need to stop abusing animals #1091294
    Matan1
    Participant

    Giving an animal a lobotomy would’t stop any suffering. Besides, what is a genetic lobotomy?

    in reply to: Non religious argument against same sex marriage #1089843
    Matan1
    Participant

    Ben Levi, true, that has been the traditional definition of marriage. But just because it the traditional meaning, doesn’t mean it is the right meaning.

    in reply to: Non religious argument against same sex marriage #1089836
    Matan1
    Participant

    They ruled based on what they felt the constitution has to say about it. The constitution, as great as it is, is a man made document. It is not the arbiter of objective right or wrong.

    in reply to: Non religious argument against same sex marriage #1089830
    Matan1
    Participant

    cent_cent,

    Do gay couples break up more than straight couples?

    in reply to: Non religious argument against same sex marriage #1089825
    Matan1
    Participant

    Curiosity,

    The American College for Pediatricians is a political group, not a scientific one.

    “1)To promote marriage because the government seeks to uphold a traditional religious/moral value system.”

    In the US there is a separation of church and state. Its not the government’s job to enforce religion or religious practice. Plus, traditional values are not necessarily good. Traditionally, women could not vote, and owning slaves was the norm.

    “2) To promote marriage because the government seeks to increase the financial, health, and social welfare of its population – believing that increasing the population and cultivating an environment where the next generation can be raised under stable, monogamous parents.”

    This will help the financial, health and social welfare of the population. There are many benefits that married couples have that unmarried couples don’t. Like tax benefits and being able to make health decisions for their spouse. Plus, it’s not like homosexual people will be increasing the population anyway. They can’t have children, whether they are married or not. And I have not seen any evidence that children raised in same gender households are any worse off than those in mix gender households.

    in reply to: Non religious argument against same sex marriage #1089802
    Matan1
    Participant

    HaKatan, I think the evidence shows that children who grow up in same sex households do just as fine as children in mixed sex households.

    in reply to: Chillul Hashem — Avi Weiss Resigns from RCA #1095770
    Matan1
    Participant

    Who is Andrew Weiss?

    in reply to: supreme decision #1089598
    Matan1
    Participant

    bikhuna: “We must start a push for a constitution amendment to protect freedom of religion”

    It’s called the 1st amendment

    in reply to: supreme decision #1089597
    Matan1
    Participant

    Rush Lumbaugh is wrong. This was a constitutional issue and nothing more,

    in reply to: Women's Bina Yeseira #1208695
    Matan1
    Participant

    If you truly held like those gedolim, you wouldn’t quote Rav Kook.

    in reply to: Women's Bina Yeseira #1208693
    Matan1
    Participant

    “Rav Berel Soloveichik ZT”L, son of the Brisker Rav ZT”L, used to relate to his students the Chofetz Chaim’s response when he heard of Rav Kook’s position on the chloni soccer players. “Kook shmook!”, the Chofetz Chaim said, dismissing both the man and the position. The story about the Chofetz Chaim – the paragon of Shemiras Halashon himself – is easily confirmed. The person who it happened with was named Rabbi Avrohom Moshe Gorelick, father of Rav Yeruchem Gorelick ZTL, who was a talmid of the Chofetz Chaim and a Rosh Yeshiva at Yeshiva University. Rav Yeruchem Gorelick (who was personally present and heard it directly from the Chofetz Chaim’s own mouth) said the story over publicly numerous times (including at the Yeshiva of South Fallsburg, where his son was Rosh Yeshiva), as did Rav Berel Soloveichik ZTL, Rosh Yeshiva of Brisk. (Rav Berel also related that Rav Kook said about the opening of the Hebrew University, that it is a fulfillment of kimitzion etc. – immediately the gedolim in Poland and Russia organized a protest against this chilul Hashem – and the Chofetz Chaim came in and said Kook shmook and then he left. See “Mishkenos Harayim” 3:1-108.)

    And the Chofetz Chaim’s statement is mild compared to what other Gedolim have said about him. Particularly relevant in this context is a letter by Rav Elchonon Wasserman to Rav Yosef Zvi Dushinsky, printed in Kovetz Maamarim, of which a facsimile of his Ksav Yad is readily accessible, where he refers to R. Kook as a “rasha gamur.” This was the eternally loyal Talmid of the Chofetz Chaim, who spent his life disseminating his Rebbi’s Torahs. (When the Chofetz Chaim was considering moving to EY, Rav Chaim Ozer asked him who will take care of Klall Yisroel in Chutz Laaretz if he leaves. The Chofetz Chaim answered, “What do you mean? You have Reb Elchonon!”)

    Regarding Rav Kook specifically, I have heard that the Chazon Ish ZT”L used to censor his Seforim by taping or marking over the anti-Torah writings in them. Of course, the Chazon Ish was more able to know what is undesirable and what is not, than the average student. If someone was the biggest Apikores and enemy of Hashem, as long as he would “work the land” of Israel, Rav Kook considered him holy. The soccer players, mechalelei shabbos b’farhesia, were to Rav Kook, “holy”. He did not mean “Tzelem Elokim” holy, but rather, because they assisted the Zionist cause they were “holy”, regardless of their status according to the Torah. Rav Yosef Chaim Zonenfeld ZTL said that he was like a person who is drunk – saying irrational, nonsensical things – and in his case, he is drunk on Ahavas Yisroel. Rav Yosef Chaim Zonnenfeld’s description of him as a “Purim Rav the whole year”. Rav Kook was considered a lone, sad case of greatness gone irrational. A more hard-line position is found in the Teshuvos Divrei Yoel by the Satmar Rav ZT”L (CM 131), where he rules outright that it is forbidden according to Halachah to follow any Halachic rulings of Rav Kook, who he categorizes as an apikores, in any area of Torah. His reasoning is based mainly on the following sources: Birkei Yosef 243:3; Responsa Bais Shlomo YD II:101; Chasam Sofer CM 163; The Gemora (Shabbos 116a).”

    Joseph, this is a direct quote of you denigrating Rav Kook, not just his nationalism. (Although to be fair, you just copied it from frumteens).

    in reply to: Women's Bina Yeseira #1208691
    Matan1
    Participant

    Joseph, you are contradicting yourself. I thought you said that Rav Kook was treif. Correct me if I’m wrong.

    in reply to: Chabad minhagim #1088516
    Matan1
    Participant

    Excellence, what you said is borderline kefira

    in reply to: confederate flag #1088244
    Matan1
    Participant

    For the record, I think the flag should be taken down. I also think that Joseph’s reason was incorrect.

    in reply to: confederate flag #1088238
    Matan1
    Participant

    Joseph, the same argument can be made about the American flag from a British perspective.

    in reply to: Women's Bina Yeseira #1208653
    Matan1
    Participant

    And a husband should always look up to his wife.

    This contradicts your point that woman are lower than men.

    No one is denying that men and women have different jobs. Rav Soloveichik is just saying that they have different jobs, not different levels of holiness.

    And it is quite disingenuous of you to quote Rav Soloveichik, when in numerous threads you have disparaged and insulted him.

    in reply to: Women's Bina Yeseira #1208652
    Matan1
    Participant

    Do you have any examples?

    Really? Do you have any evidence?

    Are you saying that men are not good at valuing family, love, and community? If so, that is very insulting to all men. I see no reason why men and woman would be different in this regard.

    First of all, being a professor is not easy. I have several family members who are, and they have worked very hard to get to where they are, and continue to put in maximum effort into their careers.

    Second, there are plenty of women who excel in both being a mother, and having a career. Speak to any kollel wife.

    in reply to: Women's Bina Yeseira #1208644
    Matan1
    Participant

    I’m confused. Doesn’t the pasuk clearly say that Chava was created after Adam?

    in reply to: The real reason for the ban against chassidish women driving? #1086924
    Matan1
    Participant

    They would probably eat the chalav stam in private.

    in reply to: The real reason for the ban against chassidish women driving? #1086890
    Matan1
    Participant

    Here’s an question I was wondering. To all woman of the CR, how would you feel if all your life you’ve been driving, and suddenly you were told by your rav that you can’t?

    in reply to: The real reason for the ban against chassidish women driving? #1086883
    Matan1
    Participant

    Just to clarify, I don’t think this is abusive. I just don’t think that we can ignore something on the excuse of it’s not our community.

    in reply to: The real reason for the ban against chassidish women driving? #1086873
    Matan1
    Participant

    Gavra, these are Jewish woman and children being abused! How can we not protest Lev Tahor?

    Like Sam said, if people view a ban on driving as abusive, we have to protest. I’m not saying this is abusive, but don’t just automatically say live and let live.

    in reply to: The real reason for the ban against chassidish women driving? #1086868
    Matan1
    Participant

    apushatayid: What about a group like Lev Tahor? They make all their woman and daughters wear burkas, a clear abuse and distortion of halacha? Should we not protest?

    in reply to: date of an upsherin #1086073
    Matan1
    Participant

    And what is the source?

    in reply to: Should Women Have the Right to Vote? #1085914
    Matan1
    Participant

    Am I the only one who finds it hilarious that Joseph uses Rav Kook to argue that woman shouldn’t vote?

    in reply to: date of an upsherin #1086070
    Matan1
    Participant

    So the hair is like the fruit of the tree?

    in reply to: is morality relative? #1086574
    Matan1
    Participant

    Yeshayahu Leibowitz has some (albeit quite controversial) interesting views on Torah and morality. He pretty much rejects that the Torah and halacha are moral. He argues that because God is so above human understanding, any attempt to qualify mitzvos as moral is pointless. Again, very controversial,but interesting.

    in reply to: date of an upsherin #1086068
    Matan1
    Participant

    What is the source and reason for an upsherin? I’ve always wondered this.

    in reply to: Would you be in favor of bringing back polygamy? #1083511
    Matan1
    Participant

    A rebbi of mine once said that the best argument against polygamy is Sefer Bereishis.

    in reply to: I would've "gotten it" for zingin' Zemiros like that! #1083474
    Matan1
    Participant

    LF- The halacha clearly states that one must remain still while davening. One of my pet peeves is when people do these ridiculous movements while davening, which can be distracting. I have even heard people clap during Shemona Esrei, which is clearly nuisance to the tzibur.

    in reply to: Gut Shabbos vs. Shabbat Shalom #1085603
    Matan1
    Participant

    For most folks, the real question is whether to say (the German) Gut Shabbos, or to say (the English) Good Shabbos.

    What do you say?

    in reply to: hot Hot HOT! #1083177
    Matan1
    Participant

    147:

    1) But if were 3 weeks away it would be okay?

    2) Complaining about heat is in no way lashon hara.

    3) You do understand that the order of when we read the parshiot is pretty arbitrary, right?

    Matan1
    Participant

    No, but I’ve seen it being used in many different yeshivos.

    And I don’t think you will find an official acceptance of any dictionary or resource.

    Matan1
    Participant

    Jastro is pretty accepted

    in reply to: parah adumah #1082788
    Matan1
    Participant

    147- What does the parah aduma have to do with the clarity and certainty of the laining?

    in reply to: Marriot #1084897
    Matan1
    Participant

    I don’t know if they do, but my statement was intended for all, not for Yeshivish people like PBA said

    in reply to: Marriot #1084894
    Matan1
    Participant

    PBA, I was not targeting that statement to Yeshivish people. It was to all people, yeshivish, chasidic, MO, Christian, and everything in-between. Way to put words in my mouth.

    in reply to: Marriot #1084887
    Matan1
    Participant

    I think you overacting to what I said. I never said anything about a chillul Hashem. All I said was it’s not a nice thing to do.

    in reply to: Marriot #1084885
    Matan1
    Participant

    When you go into a store, there is nothing that binds you to buy something. When yo go into a restaurant, one is required to buy something.

    (True, there is no amount one has to buy, but waiters and waitresses make next to nothing. Just ordering soda, while allowed, doesn’t seem like a nice thing to do)

    in reply to: Marriot #1084882
    Matan1
    Participant

    Joseph, no it’s not. When you walk into a store, there is no guarantee that you will buy anything. The owner and workers know that.

    in reply to: exams bittul toyroh #1085660
    Matan1
    Participant

    True, but as you said, we live in a society that values tests. So in order to make a parnossa, chances are you will have to take a few tests.

    in reply to: If the world is really round #1082745
    Matan1
    Participant

    What does the yerushalmi say?

    in reply to: exams bittul toyroh #1085655
    Matan1
    Participant

    If the exams are to further your education for parnossa, then it is a mitzva

    in reply to: If the world is really round #1082723
    Matan1
    Participant

    You will

    in reply to: Would you hire Barack Obama? #1081670
    Matan1
    Participant

    No. You compared Obama to Brady. But Brady has been under investigation, while Obama has not.

Viewing 50 posts - 151 through 200 (of 434 total)