Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
marinerMember
t.balck, what the heck is the point of your comment? one you are on the internet, if you did not realize! two, no one said that they think otherwise, so you either hear things, or see things, because yous tarted a conversation as if it was going on. the proper way would have been to ask if people think the internet is harmful and why, and maybe what we can do with that. but just blurting statements in argumentative form is ludicrous.
marinerMemberZachkessin: there is a simple reason, there are about 15 catholic schools in nyc. They are going bankrupt. If they close, we are talking maybe 15 kids per local school, as they are bussed from all over. Whereas yeshivos are all in the the same 3 neighberhoods for the miost part. We are talking thousands of kids per local school. There is no way in gods green earth the system could handle that type of influx at once.
As for seperation of church and state, you are regurgitating liberal nonsemse. The state isn’t picking a religion. Vouchers are used in about 17 states. Its fine.
marinerMember6) slip on shoes or tie shoes for the boy (no right answer, if he wears ties hoes, he doesn’t value time, slip ons and he is lazy.)
7) do the banana’s sit on a banana tree, or in a bowl?
marinerMemberforget homeschooling.
here is a proven idea that will work:
in the 1980’s Ed Koch had a law floating around that would have made it mandatory for all agencies (including private) that got any funding whatsoever from the government to allow gays employment. Cardinal O’Oconor was going to have none of that, so he called Ed Kooch. He let him know that the minute that law was signed, he would officially close all his shelters, nursing homes, hospitals, care centers, etc, and dump all thos people on the city. of course the city couldnt handle such a thing, especially in a 1 day, all at once period. guess what, the law never passed.
on to prices of yeshvos:
we can do the same thing, in a very simple manner,
ALL the yeshivos, AT ONCE, must close thier doors, from teh most right wing, to the most left wing, fromt eh frummest, to the most modern, ALL. a letter will go out to all parents, telling them which public school in their area they should go to for the first day of school. ALL parents must take off from work, and go with their children to the local public school. we are talking here of way over a hundred thousand of children on an already stressed system. i would say an emergency meeting in the city council, and state legislature would pass through vouchers in minutes, if not seconds, for the city and state, by law, has to educate all children, and if they dont have the capabilities, they can get sued.
see the problem is, the goyim know that we jews can never do anything as a group, because we all hate eachother. it is pathetic. so, we continue to pay more and more for education, while receiving less and less form our stolen tax dollars. thruth is, all schools dont have to od this, if even all the frummer yeshvivos did this, it would hurt the ps system. this must be done for the future of our children, as the new young parent generation just cannot afford these tuition prices. most of us entered the job market with not much more of a increased salary then our parents in similiar fields, yet cost of living has quadrupled. a house when my prents bought one, was 150-200 thousand, now, they are near 500-600 thousand. schools were considerably cheaper, and supplies for school were as well.
when we do get our vouchers, which this process will force to happen, there is a next step, one that will drive down the cost of school tremendously. now the way our yeshivos are run, there is one central office in each yeshiva, they go and order books, and materials for thier 30-60 etc studetnts in each class. that is moronic. becasue most yeshivos use similiar books. now if all of them got together, and we made a central office, just to take care of these functions, not anything else, the prices of school materials would plummet. instead of 300 schools buying 100 board erasers, one organization buys 30 thousand. the discount would be huge. now add this to chalk, cleaning supplies, paper, books, pens, pencils, stickies, etc. you get the point. even limudeo kodseh . what the heck is the differance between a meseches succah in chaim berlin, torah vodaas, mir, boston, satmer and/or visntiz, etc. NOTHING. instead of buying them each yeshiva sepreately, buy it as one, in bulk.
the catholics do it, and it cuts costs. CUNY/SUNY does it, and it cuts costs. who doesnt, the jews! the people who are supposed to be thrifty and money smart! Why? because we are idiots, and for some reason, even for our own good, would never sit down with people with different thoughts then ours. MORONIC!! this needs to stop, or kids will start going back to public school because tuition is getting impossible to pay.
all you self appointed “askanim” who somehow have access to every “godol” under the sun, the next time you are getting them to assur some other stupid thing, tell them to also sign a statement telling all yeshivos not to reopen after succos.
September 4, 2008 7:46 pm at 7:46 pm in reply to: Still Fuming At Rabbi Belsky And Mishpacha #621595marinerMembersquek, he is saying that it is english, and you are saying it is german, so you proved my point. though the j isnt really a y sound in german either, its more from the top of the mouth then the back oof the teeth sound, but thats neither here nor there. teh letter j in german is our y. just as torah is topah in russian, are you now going to say that aron is speeled apon. because according to the same logic you are using to defend rabbiofberlin, it would seem so.
again i will explain, the name matisyahu is a TRANSLITERATED name (for all you people who dont know what that is, it is not a translation (moses, aaron, joseph, david), but a spelling out phonetically of the hebraic word, (moshe, ahron, yosef(ph) dovid). it CANNOT be spelled with a j. that is a fact! it is a “y” sound, and “j” in englsh never sounds that way. yes, in other countries and cultures it is possible, but here in america, where we use the english phonetic alphabet, it is with a “y”.
marinerMemberi thught i copied the whole thing, sorry, i will look later from where it was gotten. i absolutely did not mean to do that. hey, im no joe biden, i dont plagerize!
marinerMemberintelligent, please bring a mekor for not being able to wear bright colors? i can bring mekorim that bright colors were worn all the time throughout jewish history, especcially those in the davidic family, who wore bright royal colors. bright blues and purples, etc. are you saying that they were un tznius? tznius technically changes with the times, otherwise women would get nose rings and not finger rings for engagement, as women used to not wear rings, as it was beged ish, and was not considered proper for a women to wear one. (back then rings were used as signets.) women wore open toe sandals. there is no way you will be able to convince anyone that only jews in teh middle east had shoes hundreds of years before their invention in europe. they either went with leather sandals, or barefoot. hair covering, while my wife does, i definately undersatnd where certain rabbonim feel that it may not be mandatory any longer. remember, hilchos tznius is never brought down until late rishonim, for the simple reason that it is not black and white as you and others suggest. it s changing thing. yes, we dont believe time changes halacha, but here the halacha is that it changes. that is what was built into the halacha. as far as form fitting, that is also arguable as to what is considered too form fitting. you may be disgusted by what my wife wears, and i will think that you look like you are wearing left over clothing from 1984. as long as we dont judge eachother, god will love us all. as long as you dont push your chumros, and that is what they are, on someone else, then we will all get along. noone believes you want to throw up when you see a tight fitted shirt, that is ridiculous. because what the goyim wear should make yuo so sick, you will need to be hospitilized. it bothers you, but tough. you have no right to tell other people what to do. their rov does, and it is his obligation, and his alone, to do that, as he may know more about those people then you. maybe the clothing the women you are seeing is actually teh most that women will go to be tznius. maybe she used to wear more revealing clothing, and this was her compromise for now. how dare you judge! how are you to know the level of that womens yetzer hora, and how she is fighting it day in and day out, and her schar at the end of the day will be far greater then yours, since you clearly have no problem wearing clothing 2 sizes too big. not knocking you, but you are definately not in the norm. i think most women out there are just trying to get by in life, and do the utmost to be tznius. is there room fro growth, of course! but you have no right to mock or denegrate other women for the so called “lack” of tznius. i am sure if i studied your life in one day, i can mock many of the things you do. just stop, and learn to love a fellow jew(ess), and to be dan them lekaf zechus.
September 4, 2008 5:30 pm at 5:30 pm in reply to: Still Fuming At Rabbi Belsky And Mishpacha #621594marinerMemberjoseph, i can prove you wrong very simply. the jews knew what was coming, that is why my grandparents got the heck out. they were here in america before teh war started because they saw the anti semitism getting worse after ww1. thats both sides, hailing from hungary, belarus, lithunia, and poland. so all my grandparents knew to get out. how? because they used their judgement. that is all that was said. that just because reabbonim in their communitites said to stay, they didnt, because it wasnt halacha to listen, as it was in the spirit of suggestion. they chose, thank god, not to listen, and left. what was being said was that what rabbonim say, when not in regard to halachic practice, does not have to be listened to on the same level as a halchic decsion. this was common practice until very very recently, past 20 years or so. this whole nonsense of rabbonim not making mistakes reaks of christianity, and must be stopped dead in its tracks. its thuggish, and keneged halacha, to tell people because they dont want to listen to the “advice” of a rov, that they are not following halacha.
marinerMemberSarah Palin vs. Barack Obama
Democrats, between sniggers of derision and snorts of disgust, contend that Sarah Palin, John McCain’s vice-presidential pick is ridiculously unqualified to be president.
It’s a reasonable objection on its face except for this small objection: it surely needs to be weighed against the Democrats’ claim that their own candidate for president is self-evidently ready to assume the role of most powerful person on the planet.
At first blush, here’s what we know about the relative experience of the two candidates. Both are in their mid-forties and have held statewide elective office for less than four years. Both have admitted to taking illegal drugs in their youth.
So much for the similarities. How about the differences?
Political experience
Obama: Worked his way to the top by cultivating, pandering to and stroking the most powerful interest groups in the all-pervasive Chicago political machine, ensuring his views were aligned with the power brokers there.
Palin: Worked her way to the top by challenging, attacking and actively undermining the Republican party establishment in her native Alaska. She ran against incumbent Republicans as a candidate willing and able to clean the Augean Stables of her state’s government.
Political Biography
Obama: A classic, if unusually talented, greasy-pole climber. Held a succession of jobs that constitute the standard route to the top in his party’s internal politics: “community organizer”, law professor, state senator.
Palin:A woman with a wide range of interests in a well-variegated life. Held a succession of jobs – sports journalist, commercial fisherwoman, state oil and gas commissioner, before entering local politics. A resume that suggests something other than burning political ambition from the cradle but rather the sort of experience that enables her to understand the concerns of most Americans..
Political history
Obama: Elected to statewide office only after a disastrous first run for a congressional seat and after his Republican opponent was exposed in a sexual scandal. Won seat eventually in contest against a candidate who didn’t even live in the state.
Palin: Elected to statewide office by challenging a long-serving Republican incumbent governor despite intense opposition from the party.
Appeal
Obama: A very attractive speaker whose celebrity has been compared to that of Britney Spears and who sends thrills up Chris Matthews’ leg
Palin: A very attractive woman, much better-looking than Britney Spears who speaks rather well too. She sends thrills up the leg of Rush Limbaugh (and me).
Executive experience
Obama: Makes executive decisions every day that affect the lives of his campaign staff and a vast crowd of traveling journalists
Palin:Makes executive decisions every day that affect the lives of 500,000 people in her state, and that impact crucial issues of national economic interest such as the supply and cost of energy to the United States.
Religious influences
Obama: Regards people who “cling” to religion and guns as “bitter” . Spent 20 years being mentored and led spiritually by a man who proclaimed “God damn America” from his pulpit. Mysteriously, this mentor completely disappeared from public sight about four months ago.
Palin: Head of her high school Fellowship of Christian Athletes and for many years a member of the Assemblies of God congregation whose preachers have never been known to accuse the United States of deliberately spreading the AIDS virus. They remain in full public sight and can be seen every Sunday in churches across Alaska. A proud gun owner who has been known to cling only to the carcasses of dead caribou felled by her own aim.
Record of bipartisan achievement
Obama: Speaks movingly of the bipartisanship needed to end the destructive politics of “Red America” and “Blue America”, but votes in the Senate as a down-the-line Democrat, with one of the most liberal voting records in congress.
Palin: Ridiculed by liberals such as John Kerry as a crazed, barely human, Dick Cheney-type conservative but worked wit Democrats in the state legislature to secure landmark anti-corruption legislation.
Former state Rep. Ethan Berkowitz – a Democrat – said. “Gov. Palin has made her name fighting corruption within her own party, and I was honored when she stepped across party lines and asked me to co-author her ethics white paper.”
On Human Life
Obama: Devoutly pro-choice. Voted against a bill in the Illinois state senate that would have required doctors to save the lives of babies who survived abortion procedures. The implication of this position is that babies born prematurely during abortions would be left alone, unnourished and unmedicated, until they died.
Palin: Devoutly pro-life. Exercised the choice proclaimed by liberals to bring to full term a baby that had been diagnosed in utero with Down Syndrome.
Now it’s true there are other crucial differences. Sen Obama has appeared on Meet The Press every other week for the last four years. He has been the subject of hundreds of adoring articles in papers and newsweeklies and TV shows and has written two Emmy-award winning books.
Gov Palin has never appeared on Meet the Press, never been on the cover of Newsweek. She presumably feels that, as a mother of five children married to a snowmobile champion, who also happens to be the first woman and the youngest person ever to be elected governor of her state, she has not really done enough yet to merit an autobiography.
Then again, I’m willing to bet that if she had authored The Grapes of Wrath, sung like Edith Piaf and composed La Traviata , she still wouldn’t have won an Emmy.
Fortunately, it will be up to the American people and not their self-appointed leaders in Hollywood and New York to determine who really has the better experience to be president.
09-03-2008 – 10:04 AM
September 4, 2008 4:43 am at 4:43 am in reply to: Still Fuming At Rabbi Belsky And Mishpacha #621588marinerMemberjoseph, btw, why did you want to know my age and marital status?
September 3, 2008 12:43 pm at 12:43 pm in reply to: Still Fuming At Rabbi Belsky And Mishpacha #621580marinerMemberyes, 30
September 3, 2008 4:37 am at 4:37 am in reply to: Still Fuming At Rabbi Belsky And Mishpacha #621577marinerMemberrabbiofberlin: the message i mistakenly left for joseph i will repost for you:
you are wrong, joseph is an english version of the hebrew name yoseph, just as sam is irish for george. yoseph spelled that way, and matisyahu for that matter, is a transliteration, a english spelling, with a hebrew pronunciation. no-one has the name in america, or anywhere i have ever heard, as matisjahu, with a jah sound where the yah sound belongs. your logic is very wrong in thinking the proper spelling would be with a j. moshe is moses, ahron is aaron, but that is not the way to spell the hebrew name moshe and ahron, that is the way to spell the english names of moses and aaron. just because that are the english bibles translation, doesnt make moses the proper spelling of moshe.
September 3, 2008 4:35 am at 4:35 am in reply to: Still Fuming At Rabbi Belsky And Mishpacha #621576marinerMemberjoseph, sooree, so sooree
September 2, 2008 9:11 pm at 9:11 pm in reply to: Still Fuming At Rabbi Belsky And Mishpacha #621571marinerMemberjoseph, you are worng, joseph is an english version of the hebrew name yoseph, just as sam is irish for george. yoseph spelleh that way, and matisyahu, is a transliteration, a english spelling, with a henrew pronunciation. no-one has the name in america, or anywhere i have ever heard, as matisjahu, with a jah sound where the yah sound belongs. youre logic is very wrong in thinking the proper spelling would be with a j. moshe is moses, ahron is aaron, but that is not the way to spell the hebrew name moshe and ahron, that is the way tpo spell the english names of moses and aaron.
September 2, 2008 6:19 pm at 6:19 pm in reply to: Still Fuming At Rabbi Belsky And Mishpacha #621560marinerMemberJoseph, how is it with a “j”. It english not spanish! That is hilarious that you think transliterating into a “j” sound not found in typicall english is correctm your name is Yoseph, jot Joseph. J is eith Jah, Jeh, silent, sometimes weh, as in Juan, bu never yah!
marinerMemberoomis1105: you are so full of yourself and hypocritical. because you have to read and reread a text message to understand it, the younger generation does. sorry, but a message board is not letter writing. the reason text messaging is short bursts, and tends to have words abbreviated or slang usage is because of 2 simple reasons. 1. it helps, because until recently most phones did not have QWERTY keyboards. 2. text messaging is SMS. SMS allows only for 160 characters, including spaces, so this type of writing was needed. funny you should say that message boards are more like writing a letter, those abbreviations and slang you see, it comes from message boards. it has become more uses in SMS texting because of character constraints, but outside of “yeshiva world” when you go to more techno savvy boards, ones used for technology especially, abbreviations are all over the place. (some are very off-color.) email would be more like letter writing. message board posting is more like putting a message on a bulletin board in a college, hence the early term for message boards, “bulletin boards”. as for the emoticons, girls especially have been using smiley faces and frowns in their letters and cards for decades. as far as texting not having any deep thought involved, that is simple as well, the question usually isnt very deep either. you again only have 160 characters, so usually its a question about fact, as if are we going to lunch, or what do you want to eat, or did you hear about what that person did, etc. no one has deep conversations on text messaging, it would take for ever. teens gossip, and that may go on and on for hours, but it isn’t deep and thought provoking. you may not be able to tell from the message the tone, so that is why emoticons are used. saying they are not withstanding would be like saying without punctuation withstanding, i can never understand any book i pick up, because its just words written in a funny order. emoticons are used for that exact reason, to let the reader know the intent. in a way it is the punctuation mark of texting.
marinerMemberPashuteh Yid: no problem, just wanted to make sure. i have met the people behind it, and they are emes. whether or not your rov agrees, is fine, just letting it be known that there are two tzedadim. and btw, half in not more of the people on here think the ou is trief, so saying to read that here is technically useless.
marinerMemberDoc: Zionism is failing? really? funny you should say that, since aliyah is on th erise like never before, and every single one of those people making aliyah is an orthodox ZIONIST!!!!!! maybe not a socilist zionist, like the zionists yeshivas like to make believe is all there is to zionism, but they are religious zionists all teh same. zionism is on the rise in all “black hat yeshivas” throughout america! go to any summer camo, even agudah, and counselors proudly have israeli flags hanging in their bunks. the younger generation is at a time where their love for israel is growing. nefesh benefesh cant work fast enough to help people move to eretz yisroel. you are in serious denial if you think zionism is dead. yes, the zionism of yesteryear is dead, kibbutzim for the most part are dead, even moshvei shitufee are dead, and a way of the past. but Zionism of the religious type is flourishing, from the mizrachi movement, and their young teenagers who proudly put on the uniform of the tzahal, to the ones who get beaten to a pulp for the stachim and outposts, to the yeshiva bochurim who go their to learn, and then move there to the young married couples who leave everything behind and make aliyah, Zionism is not dead! it is alive, and well!
marinerMemberjosh31, i think that law was not in effect in 69, thats the problem, in went into effect later. i think the law passed earlier that year, but at the time was not actually in effect, or something like that. regardless, he was from the most powerful family at the time, and was untouchable. hes a murderer, and him and carter and pres clinton are the “lions” of the demokkkratic party. what a great party for jews to be associated with.
marinerMemberPashuteh Yid – i think all these questions are raised on the techeles web site. they are emesah people, trying to do good. they arent trying to trick anyone. they have answers to all these questions. you may not agree with their answers, and they are fine with that. just don’t say they are wrong. you may feel they are mistaken, but they feel they arent, and al pi halacha, they are wearing techeiles regardless (they say not to put it on a linen beged, so there is no issue of shatnez).
marinerMembermayan_dvash:
about rabbi rudinsky’s psak regarding the techeiles, here it is first hand:
it is kosher, but not mandatory. the issur of techeiles being of the wrong color is on teh seller, not the wearer. if the wearer thinks he is wearing techeiles, he is fine. the peiople selling this, they have done tremendous amounts of research, and truelly believe they have found it. so that issur is moot. he said that until moshiach comes and tells us for certain that this is the techeiles, their is no mandatory obligation to wear it. there are people in his shul that wear it, but few. in his yeshiva there are also a few, but not wveryone. as far as rabbi ari senter’s psak, it may be based on his rebbe’s – rabbi rudinsky- psak, which he was there for shabbos afternoons about 10 years ago, when this techeiles was found. for more shiurim from rabbi rudinsky, for those that have no clue who he is, and the vast amount of knowledge he posseses, they can be downloade3d and heard at ohrreuven.com. his sefer mishkan bezalel is also available there. he was on of the talmidei muvhak of reb yaakov kaminetzky, and learned bechavrusa with him from the age of 5-6 till reb yaakov’s petira.
marinerMembersquek, sorry, but halacha doesnt have any value in teh us court system.
a lwyer can correct me, but from what i have read, if it was shown that he was drunk while driving, then his indeferance to her life, the fact that he didnt go and save her, pushes that act into the previous crime of dui, and makes it vehicular manslaughter. because he was never checked for alchohol levels in his blood, all it was was a tragic accident, in which his indifferant behaviour meant nothing under the law. teh kennedys are all reshoim gemurim, and anyone associated with their party, teh demokkkratic party, just remeber, oy lerosho oy leschaino. may his tumor grow to the size of his oversized head, and may his liver rot!
marinerMemberthe reason why he isnt in jail, is because the case was considered an accident, since his family hid him, and the police were nevr able to find if he was drunk, which of course the irish alcoholic was.
August 26, 2008 10:06 pm at 10:06 pm in reply to: Still Fuming At Rabbi Belsky And Mishpacha #621474marinerMemberjoseph: they are not being apologetic toward this kastener fellow, they are asking why the satmer rov didn’t thank him, regardless of him maybe being a rosho. he still saved the rebbes life. yes, did hakadosh baruch hu orchestrate it – yes, but that is the stupidest most dumb reason not to thank someone. because technically with that train of thought, a thank you is never in order, as really no one does anything for anybody, hashem is doing it all. sorry, but simple hilchos derech eretz and hakaros hatov mandate that when someone does something for you, you thank them, and the rebbe didnt, hence their questioning. and if the rebbe was so hell bent on thinking it all came from hahsem, why didnt he honor hashem as the guest of honor instead of all his big donors, at his melava malkas? after all hashem gave him the money?
August 26, 2008 12:05 am at 12:05 am in reply to: Still Fuming At Rabbi Belsky And Mishpacha #621442marinerMembermarinerMemberzalman, it is well known that rav elchonon never called him an apikores. its a buba meisah. and the netziv, again ill say, and this is documented in the torah temimahs biography of the netziv, that if the holy volozhin yeshiva was only created to be there to teach rav kook, then it would have been enough. the netziv was known to wear teffillin all day, and his talmidim wanted to as well. he never allowed them to. when rav kook asked, he was given the ok, and the netziv told the rest of his talmidim that only a pure yerie shomayim can wear teffilin all day. but then again, the netziv was a nobody according to zalman. only the voyel moshe was ok in his book.
you want to talk about korach., go look at rashi there, it talks about oy lerosho oy leschaino, and neturei karta, who are mamesh reshoim gamur, besides being mechalelei shabbos, since there are pictures of them carrying on shabbos, using bull horns at a rally in iran, are very close to satmer, and even use yoyoel moshe as their bible for hatred of fellow jews (though their actions put their jewishness into question). and the crc, the satmer hechsher, that puts ads in teh ny times, and has billboards up on highways how medians yisroel isnt jewish, are you going to say this a jewish thing, to air our machlokesin to the goyim? satmer are all nuts, they have gone off the deep end. yes ,reb yoel was a zaddik, but his grandchildren are petty, and cause major chillulei hashem. its all on youtube, go look for it, the supreme court cases, and the stuff they were claiming about eachother. pathetic. this stuff you never see in teh mizrachi movement. all gedolim, even agudist, are considered to them toras emes. they do learn voyel moshe in alot of the mizrachi yeshivos, but i doubt rav kooks seforim are learned in satmer.
zalmen, youre a fool to think that reb yoel was in the majority, he wasnt. maybe umongst hungarian rebbes, who like to live in 1780. but the litvish mehalech is to go with the present, and that is that the medina exists, and we have to live with it. rov kook was just as big as any godol of his day, only differance was he was a chief rabbi, which has halchic status as a nasi, so his psak held more weight then most. voyoel moshe had a little shtelar in uberland hungary, in waht actually was a litvish town up until ww1. yes he was a huge talmid chochom, but he wasnt a chief rabbi fo anything. his psak went for his chassidim, rav kooks for the entire english mandate of palestine, which actually included jordan as well!
marinerMemberanonymouse: now you have changed the question. the question has nothing to do with crocks, but the colors of shoes. it is moot what type of shoe. youre asking if neon color shoes are tznius.
now go find a rov, and ask him. then do what he says. asking here is utter stupidity.
marinerMemberwell i gues our emohos, and the wives of our tannaim and amoroim were all not tzniusdik, as they all wore sandals, which have holes all over them 🙂
marinerMemberyochi, there makor is is based on stretching the words of the rambam, big deal, using their theories anything is possible. i once had this discussion with them, and i asked why not the baal shem tov, or the magid of mezritch, and the chabadsker had no answer. the idea is idiotic, and is absolutely the same as early christianity. there is absolutely no difference in theology between being a mishichist, and being from teh christian era after his death. the only difference, jesus was a tana! he was able to do techias hameisim, and knew the shem hameforosh! so you tell me how rav belsky is wrong with his analysis.
and her aare two of many proofs that he cant be moshiach, since you claim to never have heard any.
1. when yaakov saw in the nevuah of dan that shimshon would come from him, he thought he would be the moshiach, until he saw him die, hence a dead person cant be moshiach, at least according to yaakov avinu, but feel free to argue it up wit him.
2. if you ever read the disputation at barcelona, whic was the ramban’s debate with a heretic priest, he clearly states how the moshiach has to be from our generation, and must fulfill ALL the duties of moshiach before being proclaimed the moshiach.
3. sefer habris says that someone who starts doing the work of moshiach, and appears to be him, but then dies, he is not, and never was the moshiach.
i can bring more, but that should suffice.
marinerMemberyanky55, unfortunately there are. for some reason there are people out there dumb enough to vote for a communist for president.
aliyah, here we come!!!
marinerMemberBiden is no longer the dumbest man in the senate. obama is. now he picked a running mate who in his own words doesnt believe obama will be a good president. obama is a tool.
marinerMemberfor a change i completely agree with cantoresq. unlike Yussel, i was going to blast him until i read the bottom, and realized he was quoting someone. he is dead on, nowadays there is no room for debate. the fact that harav yoshe Ber ran circles around the “rabbonim” of his day is completely ignored. in the us there was no one like him, maybe except his brother, reb ahron. now understand that he was around before his cousin, rav moshe, and his close chaver, reb ahron soleveitchik were here. remember he STARTED agudas yisroel of america! it is when the hungarian chassidim came to america, and started flexing their muscles in agudah, that he went his separate ways. like reagan said about the dems, i didn’t leave the democratic party, the democratic party left me, so he felt. Rav soleveithchik didn’t leave aguda, aguda left him. his halchik decisions about mizrachi and the ny board of rabbis was no differant then say rav moshe’s about chalov stam, and reb yoel teitlebaum about medinas yisroel. they were all toras emes! and anyone who mocks the other is a pure fool. yes you can disagree, as i do with lets say reb yoel teitelbaum who was a goan olam anbout the median, but to say yoele teitlebaum was an idiot fool wearing a fur hat would be chtzpadik, as is calling Harav yoshe Ber – jb.
on a side note, i was in a seforim store one day, and 2 kids were sitting there making fun of a pictire for sale, the rwere saying, hah its that shack guy, and making spitting sounds. have no clue what was up with that, but i wlked over to stop them. i look at the picture, and lo and behgold, the kids were a bunch of punks, it was rav moshe, i guess the litvishe yarmulka threw their chutpadik tachtonim off. forst i said, your both isdiots, as that is rav moshe feinstein, then i said, what chtzpa do you have irregardless of the fact that it is nt rav shach, to make fun of a man 70-80 years older then you, again irregardless of the fact that he is one of the gedolei yosroel! their answer, our rebbe doesnt like him. i got fuming, and called their yeshiva and without saying which rebbe, that their talmidim, are being chozek rav shach, and they were shocked, and said they would look into it. so the roblem here is not the ppl, but the rebbeim who in shiur smack rabbonim who dont tow the line, like rav yoshe ber, who by the way technically had more talmidim then anyone eles in his generation. (ok, some of them may have gone on to do things that we can call questionable, but not all).
same goes for rav kook. he was such a tzaddik, that as a bochur, he was the only one the Netziv allowed to wear tefillin all day! the netziv was known to say that if the volozhin yeshiva was only created to teach rav kook, then it would have been worth it. when he came to eretz yisroel many thought he was moshiach, so again, its rabbeim who put nonsense in bochurims heads
marinerMemberthinkfact, you are technically correct, paul kept the mitzvos, though the deifying is put into question by many historians. it seems that in all likelihood, all he did was claim jesus to be the messiah, which is more like meshichistos today.
it was peter that later on went and moved christianity away from judaism for good, bringing the religion to the surrounding paganistic cultures of the time. he was the one to get rid schitah, bris, etc. but even at that time, they still kept shabbos on saturday. there is a story that has been around that peter was sent in to the religion to move it away due to its danger to judaism by the tanaim, and that peter was actually a tana himself, and on his deathbed he wrote nishmas, to show that all he did was for the sanctification of hakodosh baruch hu, and so that the dangers of chrisitanity being so close to judaism would no longer be an issue.
August 21, 2008 12:23 am at 12:23 am in reply to: ?? ???? ????? ??????? ????? ???”? ??????? ??? ????? ???? #620998marinerMembersame goes for not saying yehey shmey out loud, and modim in chazoras hashatz under ones breadth. these are also minhugai ta’us. a minhag that can go both ways, and it depends on the shul would be hageshem or hagashem in mashiv haruach (reb moshe and reb yaakov argued). yanky55 is right, there is no-one who says to say the end of the gual yisroel brocha under ones breath.
marinerMembersquek, youre an idiot in the truest sense of the term.
Reagan was inexperienced? are you nuts? he was a two term governor of one of the largest states in america. 8 years as teh executive of a state is considered experience.
Lincoln was a 4 term congressman, at a time when many presidents came from congress, so again, he had experience.
JFK was a 3 term congressman, and a 1.5 term senator.
LBJ did 12 years in congress, and 11 in the senate. not to mention he was a vice president.
Truman did 2 terms in the senate, and was also a vp.
btw, nixon only had 3 years in the congress, and three in the senate, alot less experienced then the above. (still was a great president, irregardless of whitewater, as every president did and still does that stuff.)
wait here comes the good stuff:
Barack Hussein Obama II: community organizer, a law professor. when he announced his intentions to run, he had done barely 2 years in the senate. oh, and his community organizing, yeh, that was for a socialist organization, which has admitted and convicted radicals and terrorists as members. YAY OBAMA!!! you are a real talented guy, so deserving of peoples votes. unfortunately the people deserving to vote for you, under law may no longer vote, because they are convicted felons.
marinerMemberpashuteh yid, that is here, not in eretz yisroel. in eretz yisroel, they use hebrew words, like chareidi, mizrachi, da’ati, chiloni, etc.
marinerMemberwhat do:
1. Tony Rezko
2. Nadhami Auchi
3. Jeremiah Wright
4. Moussa Marzook (write the hamas manifesto)
5. Louis Farakhan
6. Allison Davis
7. William Ayers
8. James Meeks
9. Rashid Khalidi
have in common?
Answer: They are all either convicted criminals, Marxist radicals, terrorists and their supporters.
Oh Yeh, and they all are friends with Barack Obama, and have raised money for his campaign, mentored him while growing up, and sat on boards with him in various not-for-profits. go ahead, vote for this unpatriotic socialist bigot with terrorist ties that should place him on a watch list, not on a presidential ballot. im pulling the lever for an american hero, JOHN MCCAIN!!!
marinerMemberujm, charidal is short for charedi leumi, or a mix of charedi, and mizrachi.
marinerMemberto all those that are saying, why are people judging him, the question should be asked directly to rabbiofberlin, as he is the one who started this conversation (rabbiofberlin – i am not attacking you!).
and i qoute:
“As I am a fervent and avid supporter of Shlomo’s derech and think of him as a Tsaddik, can you, out there, tell me what you think about his music, his Nussach hatefillah and, lastly, his derech in ahavas yisroel.”
he directly asked for this line of questioning. this is why his “derech” is being put into question, his “nusach” is being put to question (especially by cantoresq) and his music is being put into question.
this isnt a hard train of thought to follow. its very similar to the tests we took as elementary school children. its called reading comprehension. you read the original post, comprehend what it says, and then respond accordingly. i am in no way shape matter or form agreeing with or disagreeing with any comments made here, as i have contradicting feeling about reb shlomo, which i will keep to myself. but what i dont get is people asking why others are questions and critiquing reb shlomo, when the whole point of this conversatin is to do just that.
marinerMembera chareidi is technically another word for yirei shomayim. it is more commonly used in eretz yisroel to encompass the group of orthodox jews who are “ultra” (not that i agree that the mizrachi jews are any less ultra, but you know what i mean) orthodox. in reality is is a society in eretz yisroel that adheres to everything rabbinim dictate in both halachic and social aspects of life, where in the mizrachi communitys, known as daati, where halachic decree they follow, and social decrees are given as more suggestive. then you have charidal, which is mix of both, where most run of the mill americans will fall (heavily chassidic americans would fall in the chareidi camp.)
August 19, 2008 11:17 pm at 11:17 pm in reply to: Still Fuming At Rabbi Belsky And Mishpacha #621335marinerMemberrabbiofberlin, just a side point, “x” is “christ”, so writting x-anity is no different then writing christianity. “x” is the greek symbol for “our lord”, as it is perfect or some such nonsense, so it was taken from the gazillion getchkes the greeks had onto jesus during Constantinople. it actually started to be used again here in america when supposedly a asheira tree seller didn’t have enough room on his sign to write christmas trees sold here, so he wrote x-mas trees, and thus began the reemergence of “x” in place of “christ”(prob a buba maaseh, the story not what “x” means). dont think for 2 seconds that “x” is a “jewish” place holder for the word christ. both “christ”, which is latin, and “x” which is greek, both mean our lord. just thought you should know. it irks me whenever i see that. especially, as many people hold lehalocha the word cant be used, so for sure they should be told this (not sure if that is why you wrote x).
*****(Moderator, please do not edit this, since the terms x, jesus, our lord,
and christ are all being used for halocha leemasseh.)
marinerMemberjoseph, for one, ill assume that you meant suspicious, not specious, as specious means beautiful.
there is nothing to assume here in regard to goyim wearing shtreimels. you can see it with your own two eyes that hakodush borcuh hu so nicely gave you. all you need to do is go to the museum of natural history, and go to the area i think called the hall of civilization, or something like that, and go see for yourself. you’ll see Mongolians wearing shtrimel type hats, as well as the hungarian empire kings. i can assure you that mongolians and hungarian kings were the furthest thing from being jews. they were barbarians at best.
marinerMemberenglish teacher, you are not correct. there are many linguists and grammarians who do not agree, and say that the written english rules of grammar do not apply to the spoken alnguage, and many seem say that spoken english have its own set of rules, but most agree that the written rule and the spoken rules are not the same, and the main example they tend to bring is the one i brought, of the usage of me and i. (there are grammarians that do agree, but not all.) i was not saying that in my original post that one should use me and yenim , and not use yenim and i, i was merely pointing out that a message board follows speech patterns, and not writting patterns, due to its nature as conversive english. (again not all grammarians agree, but then again, grammarians change the rules as times change, and usage changes.)
marinerMemberthe red light, good luck, as far as the obstruction, ny law prohibits anything hanging from teh mirror, as well as the front window. technically gps in the center is also an obstruction, so pay the ticket, as most municipalities wont drop the ticket, as it is known to be a ticket given solely for collecting money.
the license plate obstruction is also something youll just have to pay, as it is against the law for any words, both the state name and “the empire state”, to be obstructed. why, i have no clue, probably also to just collect money.
as far as him being an anti-semite, sorry, but he did nothing anti-semitic, unless he called you a dirty jew, or kike when he gave you the tickets. he could have alchohol tested you, searched your car, and done other things that would be deemed excessive, and then i hear your complaint, but all he did was give you 2 tickets your guilty on by your own admission, and one ticket that is disputable.
marinerMemberOk, before I get any more accolades, that info is copied off a site:
http://www.getitwriteonline.com/archive/021201.htm
Which quotes The Texas Law Review Manual on Usage and Style, which is how I found it, since I have used that in searches before. A teacher once told us about that manual to look up proper usages of grammatical punctuation.
And about spelling, typing on a computer is not like writing with the pen. With the pen your hand eye coordination works very differently then when typing. when writing, the brain focuses on the parts of your brain that associates word patterns to write, where typing does not, your mind spits out words, and your mind also remembers where keys on the keyboard are, and connects the to, more like art. hence sometime the word the is spelled teh, and is spelled adn, because these words and the fingers used and their placement on he keyboard tend to trick or confuse the brain, and sometimes gets typed wrong. An interesting scientific study was done recently, where they found that typed words, as long as the first and last letters were correct, the center of the word can be jumbled, and it will still be readable. again, that really only explains slight misspellings, but major ones I do agree, one should if need be, cut and paste into word, spell check there, and then post, if even to just not look foolish.
marinerMemberrabbiofberlin:
before attacking me, youre comma rule for “beofore and is not correct:
One of the questions we are asked frequently is whether a comma should go before the conjunction “and” in a series of three or more items. The answer is yes. Although grammar gurus abandoned that comma rule for a while in the twentieth century, we have since realized that using the serial comma (as it is called) is a good idea for two reasons:
First, it prevents misreading. Consider this sentence, for example:
The menu for the class picnic will feature green beans, stewed apples, macaroni and cheese and okra and tomatoes.
Without the serial comma, the series items are difficult to see. Here is the same sentence with the serial comma added:
The menu for the class picnic will feature green beans, stewed apples, macaroni and cheese, and okra and tomatoes.
With the serial comma, the reader can tell easily that the class ate four different dishes, not five or six, as may have been construed without that last comma.
Mrs. Jones left all her money to her three children: Huey, Dewey and Louie.
Without the serial comma, the sentence does not clearly indicate that the three children are to be given equal shares of the inheritance. Quite possibly (especially if Huey were a jerk), Huey would get half the money, and Dewey and Louie would have to split the other half.
marinerMemberujm,
1. rav hutner came from a chassidishe family, sorry! youre wrong! this is a fact and is not negotiable! his family was sorta gerrer to some extent, yet he learned in litvish yeshivos, but big deal, does that make the current noviminsker a litvak and a yekke, after all he learned in chaim berlin, taight in skokie, and taught in kaj! i think everyone agrees his a chassidishe rebbe, not a litvish rosh yeshiva. the fact is it is well known that rav hutner leaned chassidish in alot of what he did (lubavitch claim the rebbe had alot to do with it, though his talmidim all doubt that) his learning was litvish, no doubt, but yeshivas chaim berlin does not follow the norm when it comes to litvish mehalech.
2. again, dancing and holding hands are not the same. otherwise, when an old couple walk down an aisle holding hands, there should be a mechitza, because according to you they are dancing.
3. where in the machzor vitri does it allow a male that is not a womans husband to dance with her? ok, i agree you may hold that what is being done at a mitzva tanz isnt dancing, and the litvish disagree, but both hold holding hands IS NOT DANCING! holding hands and dancing are 2 differant halchos!
5. what? chazal? you clearly have no idea who chazal are refering to. chazal is in the times of the mishna, and last i checked, none of this stuff is from then, so again you are wrong! show me where in any mishna or braisa, or even an sifri or sifra it states any of the minhagim i said, and ill agree that i was wrong, otherwise you should agree i am right! im not saying there isnt a makor for these minhagim, just that the makor isnt from chazal. the term chazal has always meant tanaic and pre tanaic times, since the term comes from the gemorah, and it never in the gemorah refers to amoraim, which it would since it was compiled around 100 years after the majority of the later amoraim were niftar, and there were only a handful of them left.
and again, if a shul has a minhag, correct then it is their right, and if a rosh yeshiva has his psak, IT IS HIS RIGHT! if he doesnt want to mesader a kiddushin that will have a mitzva tanz, HE is in HIS RIGHT! the original poster to this discussion does have a problem, and that is exactly my point! you made it for me, congrats!
and any mom and pop mt i have been to is similiar to most, and a badchan in nature is a jokester, or in its literal translation, a jester! how that isnt a person making chozek, i dont know, but you claim your jesters are serious ppl who are doing holy things, gezunta hayt, maybe im not holding on a high enough madreiga to see how making fun of the families in good natured fun is holy. sorry.
marinerMemberzalman, i dont feel under siege because of my clothing, sorry, its a chassidisha thing to care about the outside livush. sorry, but wearing the clothing of the mogolians and early hungarian empire doesnt make you any more jewish then me in my 20th century looking clothing (if you dont believe the shtreimel is mongolian, go to teh musuem of natural history, and go take alook, youll be utterly surprised). you want to look authentically jewish, put on a kafiayh, and the arab cloak thing worn in arabic countries, chances are that is what we wore back then. clothing changes with the time, otherwise we would still be waring the vines of grapes like adam harishon!
im sorry, but a true “chossid” would not have said something as stupid as your comment. i work with many chassidim, and they all are ehrliche yidden, who would never say such stupidity, i believe in zeh vezeh divrei elokim chayim. which means, not slamming one side to prove the other. my attack was to prove a point, that attacking can go on on both sides, and that for some reason, its always the litvish getting attacked, and im sick of it!
seriously, you really think that clothing is what makes me think the litvish minhagim are under siege? what clothing you wear is irrelevant to me, i was not brought up that it makes a difference. you want to wear shmona begodim, gezuntah hayt, but dont for one moment think your clothing is any more jewish then mine. your clothing is from not only pruste hungarian/polish goyim, but ones who slaughtered jews by the thousands during tach vetat, so dont even start about my clothing being the same as pruste goyim today. (again befaore people get appalled by what im saying, realize i am answering this poster bec of his attack, i am showing that attacks are bi-directional, but for some reason everyone here only sees it when chassidim are attacked!)
rabbiofberlin: i have no clue what your appalled by. nothing i said is appalling at all. and to prove that im not making the attacks on litvish up, look at the post from zalman and youll see what i mean. and if you dont want to be mekatreg someone dont, dont beat around a bush and say you dont, bec in essence you are. you are no better then me on these posts, and you know it. i may have said something you dont like, but im sure in your myriad postings on this and other sites, you have ticked people off as well.
marinerMemberHaMagnat: hilarious!
marinerMemberbogen:
1. I never said rav ahron shechter was a litvak, he wears a gartel, and acts like a shtickle rebbe, since he was a talmid of the previous rosh yeshiva of chaim berlin, who hailed from a huge chassidishe family. rav hutner became more chassidish later in life, and rav ahron followed him in that direction.
2. if holding hands and dancing together in your eyes are the same, then you have a point, for the rest of us, we realize that holding hands is nowhere near dancing, and there is zero similiartiy between the two, so the whole rov ahron thing is moot.
3. youre point of the machzor vitri is the one i made, so congrats, the machzor vitri was stating that dancing INFRONT of a kallah is a mitzva, not WITH!
4. the minhagim i stated ALL started after the baal shem tov, and made inroads in the upper hungarian chassiduses around the time of R. Nosson Adler. before then, these minhagim were all asain jewish at best, and many historians, both jewish and non, say alot of these minhagim stem very possibly from goyishah places.
5. none of these minhagim were instituted by chazal, they were at best instituted by achronim. true ashkenazik customs were instituted by chazal, and those would be the ones that sfardim do as well. dont throw chazal around, they instituted very little when it comes to minhagim.
nameless:
Jent1150:
you obviously didnt get my point, the starter of this discussion made it seem as if the litvish need to answer for something, and we dont. the chassidic customs are newer, and that is fact, unarguable. i was stating that i am sick and tired of having to answer as to why i do and do not do different things, and people think i am the one who is changing how things are done. i guarantee if someone started this series and said the same thing about a chassidic custom, lets say sitting in a succah on shmini atzeres, you would smash them for everything under the sun, yet when a chassid slams a litvish custom, you go along with it.
think big: i have no clue as to what you are talking about. i do ALL my fathers minhagim, ALL! i take my minhagim very very seriously. i DONOT follow my “father in laws” minhagim, as i have need, or halachic obligation to. i agree with you %1000 percent, one should not deviate from their fathers minhagim.
(story was great, i enjoyed it and it makes total sense. i dont hate chassidim, i hate the idea that we all have to do chassidic minhagim, and if we dont, or have certain decisions regarding chassidic customs, they get questioned as if we are nuts)
btw, to all of you, you may find that certain roshei yeshiva wont be messader kiddushin if there is a mitzva tance, how about the fact that in every shteeble you cant daven for the amud without a gartel, i find that to be disgusting! (jj, trying to show that this stuff is on both sides of the isle, so to speak)
lemaaseh, when it comes down to it, us litvish need chassidim to teach us how to laugh and be besamaiach, and chassidim need the litvish to teach them to be serious, and then we can great mashiach together and figure it all out then.
[side point, about rov tendler, i heard a tape of him, and he made it seem that the mixed seating came from the feinstein side, and that rabbi tendler said ” who was i to complain – i was marrying the gadol hadors daughter” and btw, he wasn’t picked by rov moshe, since rov moshe didnt pick any of his children in laws, but he did ok them all, and he oked rov tendler. he loved rabbi tendler, and went to them for shabbos and yuntif all the time.]
-
AuthorPosts