Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
marbehshalomParticipant
why dont you take one of those accounting courses offered in lkwd?
I JUST dont know if you would be allowed to do that while living in the “irv”
marbehshalomParticipanti would reccomend taking omega 3 from fish oil. that has given me extra energy.
marbehshalomParticipantwhen u say tuna beigel do u mean a certain type of chasiddim?
marbehshalomParticipantb4 we vote we need to kow some poeple real names not just scrren names
November 5, 2012 7:58 pm at 7:58 pm in reply to: class action lawsuit against lipa (electric) #902582marbehshalomParticipantattn: lawyers
lets get working on this while the sympathy is on our side.
marbehshalomParticipantnothing? from the whole coffee room?
marbehshalomParticipantinternet
marbehshalomParticipantmaybe they can have some classes in brooklyn for us far rockaway refuggess currently residing in brooklyn?
marbehshalomParticipantthanks to all advice
October 12, 2012 8:03 pm at 8:03 pm in reply to: Working parent letter: two implementable ideas I posted #899474marbehshalomParticipantHow about the kids, who are exhausted after Yom Tov and need the day off?
well that dosent explain sept 1-sept 15 and jun 15=jun 31
October 12, 2012 6:13 am at 6:13 am in reply to: Working parent letter: two implementable ideas I posted #899466marbehshalomParticipantGevalt – there is a yeshiva in MY area that has an 11;15 dismissal on fridays in the winter. I guess Mommy will not be able to take that morning job. I hope the yeshiva administrator will understand when it comes to tuition.
October 12, 2012 12:38 am at 12:38 am in reply to: Working parent letter: two implementable ideas I posted #899459marbehshalomParticipantdass yachid –REBBE PLONI IS BUSY WATCHING HIS OWN KIDS ON HIS OFF DAYS AND GETS NO HOUSE WORK DONE.
October 12, 2012 12:38 am at 12:38 am in reply to: Working parent letter: two implementable ideas I posted #899458marbehshalomParticipantTHERE is a yeshiva in the 5 towns area which has a dismissal for the little boys at 11.15 on fridays. GEVALT, how can someone some one pay their exurberant tuitions and work with an 11.15 friday dismissal.
October 11, 2012 4:49 pm at 4:49 pm in reply to: Working parent letter: two implementable ideas I posted #899441marbehshalomParticipantDEAR moderator.
please edit the name of the yeshiva from my recent post. thanks
October 11, 2012 4:18 pm at 4:18 pm in reply to: Working parent letter: two implementable ideas I posted #899434marbehshalomParticipantrabbi dass yochid – s friend of mine’s sitch….
both parents working-
every time there is an off day they must hire expensive babysitting . this is very hard on their over stretched budget, and then they get milked for their tution money. Now if they wud have had school ON THOSE DAYS they can pass that extra $1000 on to the yeshiva.
2 which rebbe has a tutoring job from sept 1 -sept 10 or jun 19-jun 31 ?. instead he is spending his scarce money on entertaining his own bored kids. (CHUCKY CHEESES, NEW CD’S ,LANCASTER)
a rebbe works for nothing His meager salary is just to cover living expenses. which it falls short on –agreed . BUT AGAIN -THOSE EXTRA OFF DAYS DONT HELP THE PROBLEM -THEY ONLY WORSEN IT -AS I EXPLAINED
October 10, 2012 2:17 pm at 2:17 pm in reply to: Working parent letter: two implementable ideas I posted #899404marbehshalomParticipantwe love our rebbiem, but giving them days off dosent help the sitch. rather it makes wives not be able to hold jobs and therefor cant afford tuttion.
and plus the rebbiem then are busy taking care of their own kids w/o having time to accomplish- on the off days anyways.
October 10, 2012 1:33 am at 1:33 am in reply to: Working parent letter: two implementable ideas I posted #899397marbehshalomParticipanti am all for giving rabbeim higher salaries but giving then more off days does not help the problem. its not like they can use the off days for a second job.
if parents would have more time to work maye they will be able to afford more tuition.
marbehshalomParticipantthe minhag ashkenaz historically was to wear tefillin.
the chassidim and the gra changed the minhag.
those that dont keep any thing chassidish except not to put on tefillin should realize that the chassidim only changed because they lived their lives al pi chasidus and the zohar says not to wear tefllin. someone who does not conduct himself al pi chasidus does not have a license to follow such a minhag.
the proof is from sanz/bobov. all umarried bchurim wear tefiiliin. the reason is that a bochur has no connection with chassidus .
therefor if you do everyting litvish and you run out b4 hallel on pesach nite. you are exactly like a sanz bochur and the minhag insttiuted by chassidus was not meant for you.
of course if you have a legit mesorah from the gra then you are halacha based and not kabbalh based then the above does not apply
marbehshalomParticipantwould it be practical for my brother? a 35 yr old lkwd kollel guy who is quite bright
October 5, 2012 2:54 pm at 2:54 pm in reply to: Working parent letter: two implementable ideas I posted #899371marbehshalomParticipantalso while where at it… .
c.let us petition the schools to offer full a 10 month school year program— not sept 15 – jun 15 (as they are usually doing.)
marbehshalomParticipantif u forgot to check prior to cooking will depend if it was miut hamotzui or muchzak if muchzak you must ask a shailoh
marbehshalomParticipanti would like to hear form accountants if they can inform us the legal definition of ownership and how it relates to public comapnies
marbehshalomParticipantTO those that quote R’ MOSHE– R MOSHE ONLY MATERED DEPOSITING IN A interest bearing SAVINGS ACCOUNT.
his logic was that ribbis can only be when there is a borrower (LOVEH) involved . however when you deposit money in an account, since the ownership has no personal obligation to pay you back- only the bank assets are obligated and there is no borrower present and there4 does not constitute ribbis.
this is only true when making deposits when borrowing you are the borrower. so unless your corporation is borrowing the money , reb moshe would not apply.
marbehshalomParticipantWIY- Each one of the major shareholders typically only holds less then 5% and usually less then 1%. so i fail to understand what is the halchic significance of a major shareholder vs. a minor share holder.. they are both very small percent owners.
marbehshalomParticipanthey GREATEST–dont get divorced!! your current wife is better then whatever ‘s out there. i am telling you they are all the same.
marbehshalomParticipanttoi—where is the reb chsim?
marbehshalomParticipantbonus question ….who can explain why by all other kashrus issues as long as it is unfit for humans it becomes muttar
(aino ra’uy lager) while by chometz it needs to be unfit for canines?
marbehshalomParticipantAnd then you want to know… if something from itself is fit for” canine but there is an outside force being “pogem” it like a detergent is that also unfit for canine.*************************************
bonus question ….who can explain why by all other halachos as long as it is unfit for humans it becomes muttar
(aino ra’uy lager) while chometz needs to be unfit for canines?
marbehshalomParticipantrabbi shraga feivel zimmerman?
March 28, 2012 3:27 am at 3:27 am in reply to: Why Are Divorces Usually Initiated by the Wife? #870675marbehshalomParticipantand now for the best answer……the men realize the grass isn’t greeener on the side. this can only be understood logically and not emotionally.
marbehshalomParticipantI Suggest the mesibah be heal in tea for 2 in bklyn.
marbehshalomParticipantGUEST SPEAKER – POPPA BAR ABA – obesity in halacha
halacha speech – dass yochid
any more suggestions? please let the committee know.
marbehshalomParticipanthello99 – can you please give me the page of that dibros moshe? thanks
health – i need only lovaza for my condition.
marbehshalomParticipanti think that even though some guys disagreed with my opinons. i think you all are maskim that it would be praise worthy to put your treifa meds into a veg. capsule (to render them shelo kiderch). now that is good whe you have a small pill, but what does one do when they are taking a large pill like lovaza? The kosher capsules are simply not large enough.
SOMEONE SUGGESTED wrapping the pill in a tissue but I dont think that will work.
does anyone have any innovative suggestions or ideas ? thanks
p.s.why hasn’t dass yochid commented on this thread’?
marbehshalomParticipanthealth— you may be right about some capsules but i am not sure if gelcaps are dried like wood
marbehshalomParticipantyitayningwut- I would respect fully diagree with that sefer or yitchak which you qoute. MAchulos asuros remain asur untill they become repulsive from a person to eat. just b/cause its a little not tasteful does not render a machul mutar.
marbehshalomParticipanthealth- 1.the reason i say to bemachmir like the nodeh beyudah is beacause it is a shaloh of di’oraysa which we go after the machmir, besides the nodeh beyehuda is from the gedolei haposkim
2. i wouild like to point out to you that rabbi shlomo zalman auerbach writes in his teshuvos. that even though the halacha is that if one wraps a treifah food in a “siv” it is considered “shelo kiderech” a capsule is not like a “siv” , since a capsule is made as a swallowing aid.
IF you would like i can try to find the teshuvah for you to take a look.
marbehshalomParticipantRABBI OF BERLIN- CHATZI SHIUR ASRAH TORAH and therefore no basis for kuloh
health – whether swallowing is kiderech achilah or not is a machlokes bet. nodeh beyihuda and toras chayim qouted in pischei teshuvah y”d siman 156:6 .
one d should be machmir like the nodeh beyehudah
see
http://hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=9146&st=&pgnum=153&hilite=
marbehshalomParticipanthey guys don’t you think i also thought of asking a rov.
I am just a shtickel “well read” on this topic and would not mind a little “rischa dioraisah” or any mareh mekomos any of you may know. sending me to a lor is pointless.
marbehshalomParticipantwell even if you have kosher capsules , who said you can take them?
People think that food swallowed in a capsule is muttar because it is “shelo kiderech achilah”
However the poskim disagree if “shelo kiderech achilah” is muttar for a healthy person or just “choleh shein bo sakanah”
Shach and chomas adam argue. the shach holds that easurai achilah are muttar even for a healthy person
However, even according to the shach one should take in account that Rabbi shlomo zalman aurbach wrote in teshuvah that a capsule does not render a med “shelo kiderech achilah” because the capsule is made to make easier swallowing.
marbehshalomParticipantis dass yochid paid by ywn to stimulate conversation at the cr?
marbehshalomParticipantACTUALLY the Korean cleaners in inwood ny called Aloha cleaners, the owner listens to Jewish music, while doing deliveries. i heard him playing u’nesane tokef and he said Korean and Jewish music are similar.
marbehshalomParticipantHERE is my closing arguements , since my wife is getting nervous from me spending to much time posting.and not being avail for her.
dy said I think would require the shikul hadaas of a dayan to determine if it’s reasonable to expect the buyer to either see it on the jacket, or know that it’s common for CDs to be rented.
if the dayan’s shikul hadass says that he did not have to know it was a rental.(which i think a dayan would certainly say) Then even if the buyer was aware of the terms . the inyan is not ????? ????? which makes it considered ????? ???? and its void.
good bye and noce meeting you all because a coerced get ????? ???? is void.
marbehshalomParticipantHEY tums u forgot to take your tums, i said that if indeed they told eichlers then youre bound like u said. BUT ITS DEPENDENT IF IT WAS SAID TO EICHLERS BY ADERET c’mon
marbehshalomParticipantdassY- are u in klei kodesh/REBBI OR KOLLEL?
marbehshalomParticipantTO TUMS yes i agree eith you and a i mentioned it earlier as well.
IF ADERET WILL EXPILICITY TELL EICHLERS AT THE TIME OF SALE ITS A RENTAL, Then it would not be relevant what the buyers deal with eichkers was. it was not eichlers to sell. HOWEVER if adret simply sold eichlers 1000 cd’s with no verbal or contract mention of rental it would still be ????? ????
Now to my good friend RABBI DASS YACHID- CAN you be modeh to me atleast this much? If a particular buyer had no idea what it says on the jacket and had no idea of a rental , he cant be bound to a rental. will you agree this much to me?
marbehshalomParticipantmy point was that its not ????? ????? . since the buyer may not be aware. therefor, even if he punkt is aware, its not ????? ????? and it does not matter that he punkt is aware.
reason being — that not everyone reads the shmacket b4 purchasing. so even if i happened to read it, it does not count .
and the ????? ???? of rental is void . no action is needed to void it. the ????? ???? has no power to be soser the spoken words. there is absolutely no chalos rental.
marbehshalomParticipantalso a rental means that after a certain time period,it must be returned. can aderet demand return?>
marbehshalomParticipantdy-said That sugya is dealing with retracting the sale; this case is dealing with a different transaction structure than normal i.e. rental vs. sale.
the sugya discusses many different cases in all different scenarios i. i seeno reason why this case is any different
nt.
3)In that case, the possibility of applying a change has its upside and downside i.e. regaining property vs. loss of money. In this case, keeping the status quo (as originaly printed on the jacket) is completely to the benefit of Aderet.
devorim sheblev is void and does not need any retraction. there is absolutely no chalos.
see birchas shmuel 1st siman in kidushin
marbehshalomParticipantdy- What i am trying to respond to you is that…..
even if both parties were aware of a certain clause or stipulation the fact that it was not “outspoken” during the transaction it is not valid. Meaning that even if i happened to be an old aderet customer and are aware of what it says on the shmacket, still the fact is that i may not have known . therefor it was not “outspoken” during the transaction and is butol.
-
AuthorPosts