Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
MammeleParticipant
Reb Doniel: Maybe, but that would contradict the critics that say that nobody breathes in Satmar without his/her Rabbi’s approval.
MammeleParticipantTKND: That’s why I was trying not to be too argumentative.
It just so happens that someone named “Yossi Brach”, if I remember correctly, is a very vocal guy that sometimes talks on the Zev Brenner show on behalf of Satmar/R’Ahron. Would be weird if the name is merely a coincidence. And maybe I have the wrong name, but I don’t thinks so.
So I still think he’s playing us, although you might be right, so I’ll try to back off.
MammeleParticipantListen, I’m not here to argue, but the name you are using doesn’t quite sound secular, care to explain?
MammeleParticipantYour name sounds troll-worthy for your question and comment. And you became a member today? Sorry, I’m not biting.
March 7, 2013 5:25 pm at 5:25 pm in reply to: Everything is great, but I'm not sure if there is chemistry! #953662MammeleParticipantYou’re not engaged yet, don’t compare the two. And for your own you’ll iy”H be very excited, but more nervous as well.
Personally I think that some people are more positive than others, only you know if this is so.
And if he’s Mr. Perfect dating a little longer won’t put him off, but you need to let him know that you can’t make a lifetime decision in a month. Then think hard what needs to happen for you to comfortably say yes, and if you think it’s impossible you’ll need to break it off.
March 7, 2013 4:09 pm at 4:09 pm in reply to: Everything is great, but I'm not sure if there is chemistry! #953647MammeleParticipantI think it’s called cold feet. Everything you mentioned seems normal, and he sounds like a great, hard to find guy.
The only possible red flag is the “at times not attracted to him” part. Are you then turned off from him, or merely not going crazy about him?
In life in general, are you generally bubbly about stuff or more placid and perhaps cautious? Your personality and reaction to gifts for example, will not mirror those of your friend but will always remain you, albeit somewhat magnified because this is MAJOR. And if your moods normally fluctuate (and whose don’t) you can’t expect to always feel “romantic” to his gestures.
MammeleParticipantMessage to Mayor Mike: Please drop the nonsense and crack down on drunk driving.
MammeleParticipantThere are no words, only tears as we mourn the loss of another pure neshamah.
MammeleParticipantThanks torah, for starting this thread. All our hearts are breaking, yet we were basically discussing nonsense.
May Hashem comfort the grieving families (and community) and may Tinuk ben Reizel have a complete recovery and bring nachas to all concerned.
There’s really nothing to add, just Hashem, ad mosai?
MammeleParticipantWell, I think you should have stayed at your father’s shul…
MammeleParticipantVM: 1. Most guys won’t take such a sign literally. Although they could have written it more politely, most guys wouldn’t take it seriously enough. (I know, I’m generalizing.)
2. It’s not a matter of not offending one guy and having some whispering, in Shuls where talking is ignored it eventually escalates to not a fish market but a chicken market. I’ve been to shuls where when there is a simcha the women’s gallery literally sounds like one -even during leining.
Emphasizing no talking is a necessity for a shul to remain a place of davening.
MammeleParticipantI saw an interesting chicken salad in avocado recipe online recently. It’s called creamy avocado chicken salad.
I haven’t tried it but it seemed like an interesting twist to plain old chicken salad (it even had corn chips and tomatoes. Yum). You can try googling it or experiment on your own. Bon appetit!
MammeleParticipantI’m confused now. Are you a retard or not?
And btw, I mean sholom aleichem, I mean a gutt voch (I’m not giving you my name here) when did you daven?
MammeleParticipantY123: Huh?
MammeleParticipantActually I had a similar experience with a 5 dollar bill (these are not usually forged). The storekeeper said he couldn’t accept it because it didn’t “pass” his device but he wasn’t sure it’s a fake either. So he returned it. I think his machine went by color. To me it just looked washed out and I was kind of offended.
I didn’t bother checking with a bank, but I don’t think they can confiscate it based on flimsy evidence. This was many years ago, I don’t know what testing methods stores use today.
MammeleParticipantWhat’s the difference between a full-fledged filter and filtering with a cloth on Shabbos/Pesach? I’ve always known that since the water is fit for consumption without it it’s allowed on Shabbos.
MammeleParticipantActually, IIRC the DEP admitted to ADDING copepods to the water supply for some benefit…
And NYC will eventually get filtered water if the feds have their way, at least from some reservoirs .
MammeleParticipantCan somebody clue me in: if we have a filter but don’t always change the cartridge soon enough and the water starts tasting bad, does this mean we are drinking more copepods than without a filter/cartridge at all, or we can assume it’s “just” sediment?
MammeleParticipantSnow bunny: mistakes happen, and perfect people do not exist on this earth. Totally not believing in Hashem chalila, is far from similar to tripping up.
This does not exempt us from trying harder, and with most Shabbos “mistakes” you can institute “fences” so that they don’t reoccur. Changing out the tissues, covering light switches, putting away muktzah stuff etc. are good ideas to implement for everyone, especially those that are not “in the habit” yet or absent-minded. Hatzlacha!
As a side note, did anybody find the “aveirah” video done by yeshiva bochurim, presumably for purim, offensive? Before reading the details I thought it was done by otd guys.
MammeleParticipantJust fyi, some store baked rugelach are not as appetizing as they appear. Watch how they bake/store/ship it…
MammeleParticipantAre you sure about sour pickles? I think many of them contain vinegar.
MammeleParticipantPerhaps it means that you can’t get the words right when you sing? Not that you don’t actually don’t know the difference, but you’re not coherent enough and jumble your words/lyrics, whatever they may be. You don’t have to davka make this mistake, but you’re drunk enough that such confusion is possible.
MammeleParticipantWiy: sorry I thought you were seriously mocking women’s weight issues….
Whatever, have a freilichen Purim!
MammeleParticipantWiy: that wasn’t my main point. You made it sound as if losing weight is the most important thing, then wondering why they don’t fast.
You can date skinny girls and they can remain skinny most of the time for all I care. Just remember there’s more to life, you actually want your wife to function as well. If it’s going to be very important to you that she fast on an “optional” fast day, feel free to do all her chores that day.
MammeleParticipantYou guys are so clueless. Most hospitals send women home if they arrive too early, some women have impossibly short labors (not the first child) and driving yourself in an emergency can be deadly, or even impossible if there are injuries.
Bleeding, burns, even appendicitis or severe pain can lead to shock, and most issues can unexpectedly escalate.
And how easy is it to get a cab during a snowstorm? Thank G-d for Hatzolah.
Are there people abusing the system? Most definitely yes, but to go back to the way things were or still is in middle America is virtually suicidal, and not an option for Jews who value
life.
Health: adding women into the Hatzolah mix adds another layer of logistics where the benefit does not outweigh the risks. Even if you’re right with all your solutions, they may cost valuable time to be lost or backfire when things go awry.
Bottom line, if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.
MammeleParticipantWiy: married women are hopefully not as obsessed with their weight as the girls you’re presumably dating…
Especially if they need to cook for Shabbos and Purim, finalize their mishloach manos, maybe work and do some shopping; plus have a hearty meal prepared for the men to break their fast on, all while taking care of their kids.
There’s a reason the prior sentence is run-on. There’s simply too much stuff to be done, mostly food related, never mind doing it all while basically dehydrated.
February 19, 2013 11:46 pm at 11:46 pm in reply to: Who Wants to Marry a Tzadeikes Like Esther? #1141346MammeleParticipantThe coffee room is kind of slow anyway…
In any case she better have her own busy life for she’ll only be summoned by his majesty once in a blue moon.
February 19, 2013 5:10 am at 5:10 am in reply to: Lawsuit against Williamsburg stores dress code #930854MammeleParticipantThanks DY, for your psak. I’ll take it, but I don’t think I’ll risk using flaunt in this way again.
And HG, I just noticed that in the post in question I also used “too” incorrectly. Just call me out on it and we’ll call it a day.
February 19, 2013 4:52 am at 4:52 am in reply to: Lawsuit against Williamsburg stores dress code #930852MammeleParticipantVW, I actually deferred to HG after checking the definition online. However, I must have seen it in print used in the wrong context numerous times for it to creep in, so much so that even after HG’s pun, I still didn’t realize that the joke is on me…
Back to the discussion on hand: to clarify, the city is not — at least according to the quote I posted by the HR Commissioner– claiming that the signs are discriminatory against women. I was trying to refute some posters arguments to that effect. They’re actually claiming the shopkeepers are trying to force their religious beliefs on others, which is even more laughable.
In other words everybody may have dress codes, except if done for religious reasons the motive poisons the pot. It’s the old mish-mash of Freedom FROM Religion, versus Freedom OF Religion. That’s where my joke about converting others comes into the picture. The only good thing about this is that the city is finally FLAUNTING its true colors.
February 19, 2013 3:15 am at 3:15 am in reply to: Lawsuit against Williamsburg stores dress code #930843MammeleParticipantWow, you finally agree with me. We could have avoided some back and forth if my original link was allowed through. Oh well…
February 19, 2013 12:39 am at 12:39 am in reply to: Lawsuit against Williamsburg stores dress code #930839MammeleParticipantSorry for the confusion. I was being sarcastic, which if you follow my dialogue with Zdad I’m sure you’ll notice.
But I’m glad somebody is finally getting defensive about this. And now I’m being genuine.
February 18, 2013 11:38 pm at 11:38 pm in reply to: Lawsuit against Williamsburg stores dress code #930836MammeleParticipantYou’re diverting my question, but I’ll answer anyway. In this case (don’t forget we’re dealing with Williamsburg fanatics out to convert the world…) the signs specify no bare feet or shorts, and no sleeveless or low cut tops.
Since these seem to meet your criteria I hope you’re happy and will start showing some empathy for your brethren.
February 18, 2013 10:19 pm at 10:19 pm in reply to: Lawsuit against Williamsburg stores dress code #930834MammeleParticipantZdad: I didn’t say, anti-semitism, but definitely against our way of life. If Bloomberg decides to outlaw kashering meat because the salting process increases our sodium intake, would you mind or say he has our best interests at heart? Where do you draw the line? This is when we say we don’t need your sting or your honey. It’s more insidious, but I question the motives.
However, my beef (pardon the pun) is not with the guys “desperate” to shop, but with the city for FILING AN UNFOUNDED LAWSUIT — which is harassment in my book — so your analogies are incorrect.
And you could use some Jewish pride. I’ve been to Harrods — and it’s an opulent dept. Store. If their dress code were to stem from the owners’ Muslim beliefs would you still be gushing about it or would its high-class status be irrelevant? Sorry, but we are bnei melachim and Hashem prefers a modest (in both senses) Williamsburg store on Lee Ave to a glitzy one where he is not acknowledged. And we have the right to uphold His royal banner, laugh all you want.
February 18, 2013 9:15 pm at 9:15 pm in reply to: Lawsuit against Williamsburg stores dress code #930829MammeleParticipantZdad: this is not the issue here. The issue that almost nobody here seems to find offensive is that the city is targeting us. We need more backbone, we need to fight back.
The first knee-jerk response by a mod to the OP was an assumption that the city is right. Whatever happened to sticking up for our own?
Our collective self esteem has been negatively effected by some recent blows. Time to dust ourselves off and stand up for our Torah with no shame!
February 18, 2013 8:59 pm at 8:59 pm in reply to: Lawsuit against Williamsburg stores dress code #930827MammeleParticipantOops. My mistake.
February 18, 2013 7:52 pm at 7:52 pm in reply to: Lawsuit against Williamsburg stores dress code #930823MammeleParticipantMorahRach, sorry about your bad experience. These girls were obviously immature and untrained, and the mom apparently not a native English speaker, probably lacking social skills. However, if the sign was outside I don’t think that prompted their rudeness.
The people that started the whole fiasco in Williamsburg were not offended, they are trying to make a statement about their freedom to ignore social norms and dress however they like.
That’s the puzzle here, even Zdad seems to agree that these stores were within their legal rights, everybody is welcome provided they dress accordingly. This didn’t stop the city from slapping these stores with an unwarranted lawsuit.
HaifaGirl: you mean like flaunting grammar rules? Or are these the most cardinal of sins? Sorry I couldn’t resist.
MammeleParticipantI meant windshield.
February 18, 2013 5:43 am at 5:43 am in reply to: Lawsuit against Williamsburg stores dress code #930811MammeleParticipantR’ Doniel, I actually think you’re wrong, as some establishments prefer to be selective of their customers to enhance their standing with the majority of their other, probably “better heeled” clients, at least in some cases.
This is not the case here. If someone wants to shop at one of these stores, with a little foresight they can. And even if they decide to flaunt the rules they’ll probably be accommodated, perhaps reluctantly. And I’d probably get the same “look” elsewhere if I enter a shop with a screaming baby. I may not like it, but I wouldn’t get far if I try too sue for discrimination. Both examples are very different from saying we don’t allow Blacks, Jews or Eskimos to shop here, which I would find offensive.
Accommodating alternate lifestyles by forcing establishments to perform weddings on their premises is trickier to argue against legal-wise, although it definitely clashes with their right to practice their religion so it’s not so simple. It’s still not the same as refusing to sell a cup of coffee to someone practicing such a lifestyle, where don’t ask don’t tell is probably prudent.
We also have to realize that going topless is legal in NYC, and if we can’t have dress codes, we’re sunk.
MammeleParticipantMake sure to stick the ticket(s) you receive while dropping it off onto the mishloach manos. It shouldn’t take long, just ring his doorbell (?) then quickly run back to your parked car and grab the ticket off your dashboard…
February 18, 2013 2:26 am at 2:26 am in reply to: Lawsuit against Williamsburg stores dress code #930804MammeleParticipantFor anybody interested, I did some googling and it appears these signs were first brought up last July by a certain failed blogger, followed by the lovely New York Post.
What I found interesting is that all the scholars consulted then seemed to agree that it was perfectly legal under federal and state laws. I guess they forgot that the city doesn’t need the law on its side to sue, as they are very business friendly…
February 18, 2013 12:50 am at 12:50 am in reply to: Lawsuit against Williamsburg stores dress code #930803MammeleParticipantSo basically they’re saying that dress codes are okay, but not dress codes based on religious beliefs. (And these rules don’t require long sleeves for example, so they are not exactly pushing “Hasidic extremism”.)
And these stores serve everybody, not just Heimishe Yidden, or Yidden at all, for all those assuming otherwise, although most Jewish stores have mainly Jewish clientele.
However, I believe these signs were the result of a prior discrimination lawsuit by an employee of one store (and were probably made in conjunction with legal counsel) to show that the same requirements are expected of everybody and thereby avoid further legal trouble.
Obviously, hate transcends logic, hence the lawsuit.
February 17, 2013 9:51 pm at 9:51 pm in reply to: Lawsuit against Williamsburg stores dress code #930799MammeleParticipantPurpleone: The NYC Human Rights Commission is suing. Sounds familiar? Not quite the NYC Health Dept. but both are under Bloomberg’s jurisdiction. He’s obviously set the tone for all his agencies that “black hatters” are fair game.
February 17, 2013 9:39 pm at 9:39 pm in reply to: Lawsuit against Williamsburg stores dress code #930798MammeleParticipantThere’s nothing gender specific except maybe low-cut necklines. That too is interpretation only, the signs don’t single out women at all.
The kasha in this case is the answer: there are definitely those out to “get us”. Our “tolerant” neighbors simply can not tolerate our way of life.
Edited. Do not post links.
MammeleParticipantYou guys are neglecting the health issue mentioned. Once someone cheats with one thing, i.e. the type of meat, it is likely that they cheated some more and these horses were fed/medicated with stuff not allowed if raised for human consumption.
Also, some people may have not liked the meat so much and maybe even didn’t buy it again, but it would take a greater expert or someone familiar with horse meat to realize they’ve been conned.
MammeleParticipantI never heard about the kosel requirement.
But you seem impatient. First finish, then wait a little more before you decide it’s not working. Sometimes a shidduch starts cooking at the other end and you’re unaware.
Also, dividing hours (between family/friends) to cover all 24 hours so at least someone is abstaining from l”h at all times can be very successful. I don’t remember how long it needs to be done for (ideally, always…). Good luck!
MammeleParticipantI think part of the problem why you’re so desperate to go now is because you’re friends with twelfth graders.
Try to stick with friends your own age and your life will be a lot simpler.
MammeleParticipantHealth: aren’t you being a bit harsh? Your preference for longer hair doesn’t have to be universal. And short hair IS NOT the same as shaving.
And gotbeer your story is funny but not quite accurate. Even one that shaves at zero will not be “light bulb bald” the whole month. And many women shave less often than monthly when conditions are different without being bummy.
February 13, 2013 9:19 pm at 9:19 pm in reply to: Should Proper Grammar Be Required in the CR? #929489MammeleParticipantSince this is topic too controversial, I’ll abstain.
When I run for office I don’t want anybody to bring this vote up as ammunition against me… Maybe I’ll do some polling first to determine the public’s POV. Oh, I forgot, I’m not planning to run for anything, but isn’t being PC some sort of mitzva? Never mind.
MammeleParticipantThis topic was already discussed on another thread. And I’ll repeat, it’s an “Ungarischer” minhag, not davka Chasidish.
This distinction is important, as there are many so called “heimish” girls that are conveniently dropping their family minhag when they get married. Regardless of ones opinion, it is not something to be done lightly. There needs to be more awareness.
February 4, 2013 2:42 pm at 2:42 pm in reply to: Son Wants To Go Collecting In Limo On Purim #926165MammeleParticipantWiy: I hear you, but the economy has definitely gotten better, at least in NYC, and I still think I’m closer to the mark than Zdad is. If anybody has personal experiences, please post.
-
AuthorPosts