Joseph

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 351 through 400 (of 4,220 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Justice Antonin Scalia #1191113
    Joseph
    Participant

    ubiq: No. I would say the Republicans should use whatever power and/or leverage they have at the time to get a conservative replacement for Ginsberg. The point about demanding a conservative replacement now for Scalia is merely as a political ploy, knowing it won’t happen with Obama. (If shockingly he does nominate a soulmate of Scalia, then by all means let the Senate confirm it.)

    I have no doubts or illusions that the Democrats would play the same political hardball had the situation been in the reverse. The Republicans shouldn’t be stupid now and kneel over for an Obama appointment when the Democrats will never do that in the (past or) future when they control the Senate.

    in reply to: Justice Antonin Scalia #1191111
    Joseph
    Participant

    1. Exactly the point. Since it isn’t happening the nomination needs to be rejected.

    2. Obama will not be nominating anyone who isn’t a liberal/left-wing activist judge. So the point is moot. The Senate needs to reject the nomination.

    The Republicans are unlikely to lose the Senate (plus the presidential elections). And even if they might, it is worth the risk of rejecting the nomination this year. Obama’s nomination is unlikely to be much better than Clinton’s. And the Republicans may be able to control the appointment next year, as an upside.

    Considering the stakes at hand, an appointment that can last 30 years and flip the court to full liberal control now, it would be extremely foolhardy for Republicans to give this to Obama.

    in reply to: How do you address people of the opposite sex? #1138093
    Joseph
    Participant

    If small talk isn’t overly familiar, I don’t know what is. And if small talk doesn’t fall under al tarbeh sicha im haishah, then you must think that nothing does.

    in reply to: How do you address people of the opposite sex? #1138086
    Joseph
    Participant

    Sam: He writes that making small talk “on a daily basis” borders on giluy arayos which, as you know, is yehareg ve’al ya’avor. There are plenty of admonishments throughout Chazal (al tarbeh sichah im haishah, etc.) and the poskim regarding the severity of talking to women. Are you really unfamiliar with them?

    The point about avoiding conversations in the hallway or elevator he clearly listed as a “helpful suggestion”. The Shulchan Aruch says to “stay far far away from women”. As you know this is an area that one must take great precautions with.

    What do you think the Mechaber meant when he paskened to stay far far away from women? In the Sefer HaChinuch, mitzvah number 188, it states there that it is assur for men and women to talk to each other. Libo Gas Bo also applies to a man and a woman who are very friendly with each other, such as those who work together in an office. Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach (cited in Nishmas Avraham 3:94-95) and Dvar Halacha (7:17), state that Libo Gas Bo applies even if the man and woman have only had minimal interaction such as a woman who has visited a doctor a number of times or a man and woman who had some business dealings together. It is an issur d’oraysah. Rav Moshe, in the Igros Moshe, states that Lo Sikrevu means you can’t talk to women. Rav Moshe is quoting a statment of Chazal in Avos D’Reb Nosson and rulings of the Ran and others. Avos: “Al tarbeh sichah im haishah” – Do not talk more than necessary with women. The Mishnah continues: “Whoever does talk more than necessary with women causes bad for himself . . . and in the end will end up in Gehinnom!”

    in reply to: How do you address people of the opposite sex? #1138080
    Joseph
    Participant

    The things he attributes to being kraivah l’arayos are per Shulchan Aruch. Avoiding the familiarity of calling someone by their first name he says is a custom amongst yirei shomayim; he did not say someone who called someone by their first name is a rasha.

    I believe he was a Rosh Yeshiva in Yeshiva Chofetz Chaim (Queens) and was niftar just a few days ago.

    in reply to: Can folks who celebrate Valentine's Day be counted for a minyan? #1139359
    Joseph
    Participant

    Do you hold its okay to have Santa Claus give the kids Chanukah gifts?

    in reply to: How do you address people of the opposite sex? #1138078
    Joseph
    Participant

    Do you wonder if HaRav Elyashiv had personal experience in gittin or geneiva and you pasul him otherwise from paskening anything he hasn’t personal experience?

    in reply to: School Board Monitors in Lakewood & East Ramapo #1157170
    Joseph
    Participant

    No.

    in reply to: School Board Monitors in Lakewood & East Ramapo #1157163
    Joseph
    Participant

    The private school community received a tiny fraction as a percent of that aid yet pays a high amount of property taxes funding the schools. Most of that aid, by far, goes to the public school community. So, indeed, the non-public school community receives far less than they pay. So the little aid (as a percent) that the private school community does receive, is far less than they pay in taxes. And they’re entirely in the right to defend the little they get.

    in reply to: School Board Monitors in Lakewood & East Ramapo #1157156
    Joseph
    Participant

    Common sense. The private school community is paying millions and millions in property taxes for public schools and not utilizing them. It is obvious, without needing to be an Einstein, that the private school community is paying much more in taxes than receiving in aid.

    in reply to: School Board Monitors in Lakewood & East Ramapo #1157154
    Joseph
    Participant

    Residents of East Ramapo and Lakewood, both, pay more in State and local taxes than they receive in aid.

    in reply to: 300,000 Comments In The Coffee Room #1139337
    Joseph
    Participant
    in reply to: How do you address people of the opposite sex? #1138071
    Joseph
    Participant

    Option of exchanging private contact information, meet and know the others gender?

    in reply to: School Board Monitors in Lakewood & East Ramapo #1157152
    Joseph
    Participant

    The government is getting the money from the people; it isn’t the government’s money, it is the taxpayer’s money.

    in reply to: How do you address people of the opposite sex? #1138069
    Joseph
    Participant

    I follow Rav Neiman’s advice, that I reprinted above.

    in reply to: How do you address people of the opposite sex? #1138065
    Joseph
    Participant

    It is forbidden to make small talk about matters unrelated to business. Men and women working together should not discuss politics, current events, recent tragedies or gossip, even if they do not do so regularly. Discussing these matters on a daily basis, is a violation of halachos that border on giluy arayos, which requires one to sacrifice his life rather than transgress. (p. 9)

    When conversing with female employees or co-workers, one must be careful not to us the word “we,” so that the man and woman are not referred to as one unit. For example, one should not say, “We must talk with the editor,” or “We must purchase that software program.” Rather, he should say, “The editor must be consulted,” or “Please purchase that program.” (pp. 10-11)

    It is a custom amongst yirei shomayim not to call a woman other than one’s wife or immediate family member by her first name, thus keeping a respectful distance between the two parties. Referring to a woman by her first name brings inappropriate familiarity into the relationship. Similarly, a woman should refrain from addressing a man other than her husband or immediate family member by his first name. (p. 20)

    A Helpful Suggestion:

    It is appropriate for male and female employees [to] refrain from all conversation when they meet anywhere outside of the office. This includes not discussing even job-related matters when meeting in the hallway or elevator at work.

    “It cannot be stressed enough that the term prutzim also refers to people who are otherwise shomrei Torah u’mitzvos, but are not careful in matters relating to kraivah l’arayos. They may be regularly exposed to immodesty through the media, or may often be in the presence of immoral individuals through their everyday social interactions….(p.39) meaning that they are exposed to immodesty through television, movies, in publications and the like. An individual involved in such activities is labeled a parutz. This is not limited to visual images; someone who is exposed to any form of indecent activity, such as chat rooms on the Internet, is considered a parutz. Such forms of recreation are a breach of morality.” (p. 34)

    in reply to: How do you address people of the opposite sex? #1138064
    Joseph
    Participant

    Mrs. Goldsmith (if male addressing her) or Mr. Jacobowitz (if female addressing him.)

    That being said, people should not being addressing members of the opposite gender altogether unless absolutely essential.

    in reply to: Inviting other young couples over for a seuda #1170701
    Joseph
    Participant

    I don’t think couples who have been married longer should either be engaging in this type of socializing and/or joint meals.

    in reply to: Can folks who celebrate Valentine's Day be counted for a minyan? #1139352
    Joseph
    Participant

    Or having the portly fellow with the white beard come in his red rekel on Saint Nicholas Day to distribute tzedaka to all the kid’s red stockings.

    in reply to: School Board Monitors in Lakewood & East Ramapo #1157148
    Joseph
    Participant

    The APP reported within the past hour that the Lakewood State monitor looks like he’s going to back down and agree to keep courtesy bussing for substantially less from the township after voters smartly rejected a recurring $6.5M annual tax increase.

    in reply to: Can folks who celebrate Valentine's Day be counted for a minyan? #1139350
    Joseph
    Participant

    You mean as bad as celebrating Saint Hallow’s Day.

    in reply to: 2016 election and welfare #1137502
    Joseph
    Participant

    WIC is a bad program, Avi?

    in reply to: Can folks who celebrate Valentine's Day be counted for a minyan? #1139344
    Joseph
    Participant

    Saint Valentine isn’t Avoda Zora?

    in reply to: School Board Monitors in Lakewood & East Ramapo #1157147
    Joseph
    Participant

    And New Jersey’s courts have previously ruled that under NJ law, if public school children receive courtesy bussing then private school children are required to be afforded the same service.

    in reply to: School Board Monitors in Lakewood & East Ramapo #1157146
    Joseph
    Participant

    LC: The concerns for public school children’s hazardous bussing is not false. 1,500 public school parents, mostly Hispanic, turned out for a meeting last week to decry and protest the elimination of courtesy bussing, which over 40% of public school children in Lakewood are receiving. Walking two miles is dangerous for little kids on busy highway-like streets with no sidewalks, and their parents are working and cannot come with them.

    in reply to: Amazon Web Services #1137313
    Joseph
    Participant

    What are the competitive alternatives to AWS and how do they compare on price and service?

    in reply to: Women Invalid as Witnesses #1137565
    Joseph
    Participant

    Bump

    in reply to: ?????? ??? ????? ????? #1140046
    Joseph
    Participant

    Mazal Adar Dagim

    in reply to: Buisness ideas and oppurtunities #1137404
    Joseph
    Participant

    Opening a business also costs money.

    in reply to: 2016 election and welfare #1137496
    Joseph
    Participant

    The RJC is clueless about Orthodox voting. Even the MO vote majority Republican in presidential elections. The Teaneck and Riverdale numbers you cite is a figleaf and incorrect as it includes a substantial number of non-Jewish and/or non-Orthodox voters in those figures. The Brooklyn Orthodox figures are more representative as those neighborhoods are often overwhelmingly Orthodox.

    in reply to: Is there a Shidduch Crisis? #1137228
    Joseph
    Participant

    Teimanim don’t have that problem.

    in reply to: Is there a Shidduch Crisis? #1137220
    Joseph
    Participant

    Any currently in the U.S. recommending it?

    Ask around. How many currently in the U.S. are opposed to it? How many have a public position (either way) on it? Does Rav Miller count in your book? Isn’t the new position just announced by the Litvish gedolim suggest there is movement in this direction?

    in reply to: A different kind of pullups on Shabbos #1139255
    Joseph
    Participant

    What about leaving the radio on for Shabbos so you can keep up with the news (or sports)?

    in reply to: Laundry #1142046
    Joseph
    Participant

    Have the maid do the laundry. (Posted on behalf of CTLAWYER.)

    in reply to: Is there a Shidduch Crisis? #1137212
    Joseph
    Participant

    So why aren’t any roshei yeshiva suggesting it?

    Rav Miller suggested it. Other Litvish gedolim (especially in EY) are also in favor of it.

    And this new proposal by the Litvishe gedolim for the boys to marry younger is a very big step in the direction I’m suggesting. I wouldn’t expect the chasanim to jump from age 23 to 19 overnight. 21 is a good first step.

    APY: Not all Chasidishe tatti’s are gevirim. The non-gevirim manage it too.

    in reply to: Is there a Shidduch Crisis? #1137208
    Joseph
    Participant

    zsdad: In New York it is possible to legally get married at age 14.

    in reply to: Is there a Shidduch Crisis? #1137200
    Joseph
    Participant

    If we’re too spoiled then we shouldn’t rush back to marrying at an average age of 14. 17-19 is more reasonable for our dor until we can reach the madreiga of our zeidas and bubbes of not-too-long ago. It takes building up, but we should work our way back.

    The Chasidim do it today, so clearly what I’m suggesting isn’t crazy. And Rav Miller, a real Litvak, suggested it and (like other Litvaks who were alive at the same time as many people today) practiced it.

    in reply to: Is there a Shidduch Crisis? #1137198
    Joseph
    Participant

    Because we’ve become spoiled and it takes time to unspoil a generation. But Rav Avigdor Miller zt’l advised: “A Beis Yaakov girl should be wed soon after or before graduation. Every day after she leaves the Beis Yaakov marks another step away from idealism, for the street and the office and the secular school have an unfailing effect which increases from day to day.” (Awake My Glory) And Rav Miller lived, and advised, our very own dor so one cannot shrug off the aforementioned Chazal as being for a different era.

    in reply to: Is there a Shidduch Crisis? #1137196
    Joseph
    Participant

    DY: For thousands of years in Europe, pre-Europe and among the Sefardim, Yidden got married not long after their Bar/Bas Mitzvah. No one is suggesting we go back to that age marriage but it is worthwhile discussing how did they manage it? Were the Yidden for all those doros — our zeidas and bubbes — primitive? The Mishna where Chazal advise us Shemone Esrei L’Chuppa is advise when to be married by, not when to start considering marriage.

    in reply to: MAZEL TOV: YWN CR Reaches 400,000 Comments #1137030
    Joseph
    Participant

    Shucks.

    in reply to: Is there a Shidduch Crisis? #1137188
    Joseph
    Participant

    I’ve been posting here for years that they should start getting married younger. (DY could always be counted on to shlug up my proposal.) Glad they’re finally catching up.

    in reply to: Any heter to not get drunk on Purim? #1220024
    Joseph
    Participant

    If it can be done at no halachic expense, then all the better. If there is an expense, according to those that it is a l’chatchila, it needs to be evaluated whether the expense takes precedence over a l’chatchila – or not. According to those that k’peshuto is an obligation, then surely it must be done in the absence of a shas hadchak (i.e. a physical inability.)

    in reply to: YU Seforim Sale #1137744
    Joseph
    Participant

    If mishnayos and gemorah aren’t allowed, who said there’s a heter for them to learn meforshim, Ramban, etc.? What’s the differentiation? Sarah Schenirer didn’t teach those. She taught Chumash, practical halacha, etc. The Chofetz Chaim didn’t say to teach all the other things that are Torah she’bal peh that aren’t relevant to girls daily living. Just because some mechaneches running Bais Yaakovs today decided to teach those now doesn’t make it muttar. Which posek (names, please) permits teaching those meforshim?

    One that Rav Moshe (YD 3:86) names as permissible, since it teaches them middos, is Pirkei Avos.

    in reply to: MAZEL TOV: YWN CR Reaches 400,000 Comments #1137028
    Joseph
    Participant

    Bingo!

    in reply to: 2016 election and welfare #1137489
    Joseph
    Participant

    So food stamps bums should take a graveyard shift job after they finish their day job?

    in reply to: Any heter to not get drunk on Purim? #1220021
    Joseph
    Participant

    Even lshitaso you are moida that some poskim will only pasken that something other than k’peshuto is a b’dieved. And we’re supposed to strive to do things l’chatchila.

    in reply to: Life before the Holocaust in Europe #1137437
    Joseph
    Participant

    Read Rabbi Berel Wein’s Jewish history books and audio tapes.

    in reply to: Laundry #1142034
    Joseph
    Participant

    Employment is never ending. How do you make it go away!

    in reply to: 2016 election and welfare #1137486
    Joseph
    Participant

    Food stamps is given to people who work full time also.

    in reply to: What's your go to nightime snack? #1193050
    Joseph
    Participant

    All Yidden are brothers. Perhaps they’re Hungarian or Asian Yidden where the family name goes before the personal name.

Viewing 50 posts - 351 through 400 (of 4,220 total)