Joseph

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 3,151 through 3,200 (of 4,220 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rav Moshe Feinstein – a scion of Chasidishe stock #1063879
    Joseph
    Participant

    Rav Moshe’s father was a Koidenover Chosid in his youth.

    in reply to: Wearing an Apple Watch on Shabbos #1063542
    Joseph
    Participant

    Even if the watch has accelerometer/gyroscope or fitness tracking, those features can be disabled and set to display the time at all times.

    in reply to: Ethics in Action #1064154
    Joseph
    Participant

    Veltz Meshugener: That is inaccurate. It isn’t the only halachicly valid option. It is proper though because it is a kiddush Hashem. And only that.

    in reply to: Rav Moshe Feinstein – a scion of Chasidishe stock #1063876
    Joseph
    Participant

    “The Torah tells in Bamidbar (Rashi on second pasuk in beginning) that someone whose father is from one shevet and mother from a different shevet, goes according to the father’s shevet.”

    Are you trying to say that Rav Moshe is from the Chasidishe shevet?

    in reply to: Is Brooklyn becoming a retirement town? #1063577
    Joseph
    Participant

    “Because they are very large communities, the percentage growth in the Five Towns, Far Rockaway, Teaneck or West Hempstead might be smaller than Lakewood, but not the gross numbers”

    The gross numbers as well as the percent of frum growth in Lakewood far exceeds the combined total of frum growth in the places you cited.

    in reply to: Newly discovered: Only known video of the Chofetz Chaim #1064083
    Joseph
    Participant

    Rav Elchonon Wasserman hy”d looks like himself.

    in reply to: White Shirts- PF or CT? #1065525
    Joseph
    Participant

    So you can show off the “better” label to your friends.

    in reply to: Did you know? #1075651
    Joseph
    Participant

    Is that why they’re emotional wrecks?

    in reply to: What do you think of this quotation? #1107218
    Joseph
    Participant

    She’s absolutely correct.

    in reply to: Collecting on Purim in Baltimore #1063502
    Joseph
    Participant

    Barry: Jews are on average much wealthier and thus pay more taxes than the average non-Jew. NYC has 1.5 million Jews out of a population of 8 million.

    cherrybim: Kol Yisroel Areivim Zeh Lazeh.

    in reply to: Is Brooklyn becoming a retirement town? #1063570
    Joseph
    Participant

    DaMoshe, in relative terms, the frum growth in Lakewood is many multiple times the frum growth in all the areas you cited combined.

    in reply to: Rav Moshe Feinstein – a scion of Chasidishe stock #1063860
    Joseph
    Participant

    Do Yerushalmi Litvaks wear shtreimels for the same reason Chasidim wear them?

    in reply to: Is Brooklyn becoming a retirement town? #1063568
    Joseph
    Participant

    Perhaps the not-rich oilem can expand into a non-Jewish Brooklyn neighborhood until there’s a critical mass of frumkeit.

    in reply to: Newly discovered: Only known video of the Chofetz Chaim #1064078
    Joseph
    Participant

    The CC had a set of grandchildren that went OTD (during his lifetime).

    in reply to: Wearing an Apple Watch on Shabbos #1063540
    Joseph
    Participant

    Nu, if they make a model sans the tracking features (accelerometer, gyroscope, fitness tracker) you’re good to go on Shabbos?

    in reply to: Rav Moshe Feinstein – a scion of Chasidishe stock #1063844
    Joseph
    Participant

    What does Rav Chaim consider himself?

    in reply to: Wearing an Apple Watch on Shabbos #1063538
    Joseph
    Participant

    What’s the watch’s accelerometer doing for you? If merely keeping a record or log of activity, some motion detectors also keep a log/record of activity it detected. And if one of the watch’s models lacked the accelerometer, it would otherwise be Shabbos-proof?

    Joseph
    Participant

    How do you intend to combat it, an armed militia? This stuff has been going on for over half a century so however you’ve been combating it, clearly, it hasn’t been very successful.

    in reply to: Collecting on Purim in Baltimore #1063499
    Joseph
    Participant

    New York City/State government is in large part funded by Yidden.

    in reply to: Wearing an Apple Watch on Shabbos #1063536
    Joseph
    Participant

    And without the accelerometer it would have otherwise been alright? How’s the accelerometer different than having a motion detector in your home?

    in reply to: Private mikvah for men in flatbush/boropark #1063369
    Joseph
    Participant

    There are over a hundred shuls with mikvos in BP and Flatbush.

    in reply to: White Shirts- PF or CT? #1065523
    Joseph
    Participant

    Are they any better than the shirts for sale in the Hat Box and other heimishe merchants?

    in reply to: Taivah for movies #1148127
    Joseph
    Participant

    If one needs to relax and there are only activities that have women around improperly dressed (example the kids are in the house and freaking out and need to get out in the summer – everywhere there’s something).

    This is premised on an open and complete falsehood. There are always always places to go that do not have immodesty being shoved in your face.

    It is better to work in a frum environment. Agreed. But it’s not assur to not do so.

    It most certainly is assur to work in an immodest environment if you can obtain an equivalent parnasa elsewhere without being subjected to the immodesty. Even if that required longer travel.

    It could be that if there is no viable Kosher entertainment…

    And even if there were no viable kosher entertainment it would be assur to utilize non-kosher entertainment, such as featuring immodesty.

    Go to a country setting or secluded lake and enjoy the sunrise or fresh air and take a walk in the woods or a farm. You don’t need the electronic razzle and dazzle.

    in reply to: I'm anti Zionist now #1158259
    Joseph
    Participant

    Barry: You don’t want Israeli Arabs to be involuntarily drafted into the IDF but you do want Israeli Neteurei Karta Jews in the IDF?

    The Chazon Ish never said what you attributed to him. Don’t believe Bennett’s media claims to have helped chareidim. Netanyahu could have made a coalition with UTJ and Shas instead of Lapid. And Chareidim cannot leagally work until their 27 years old since they didn’t join the IDF. Eliminate that legal restriction and you’ll see a lot more Chareidim working. They oppose zionism and the State so forget the idea of them joining the idf. And they only want to live in Eretz Yisroel (and have been since before the State) and have no citizenship elsewhere that any country will accept them, so forget the idea of expelling these Israeli citizens.

    in reply to: Learning to forgive yourself #1063310
    Joseph
    Participant

    What did you miss if you wouldn’t have appreciated it anyways?

    in reply to: #INVESTING #1063320
    Joseph
    Participant

    S&P 500 Index Fund with either Vanguard or Fidelity.

    in reply to: Boycotting Borsalino? #1070165
    Joseph
    Participant

    Yeah, but the boycott put the company over the top into bankruptcy court.

    The power of Yidden!

    in reply to: Any heter to not get drunk on Purim? #1220005
    Joseph
    Participant

    There’s no chiyuv to drive while there is a chiyuv to get drunk. Don’t drive and do drink.

    in reply to: The Demise of Jewish Music #1063462
    Joseph
    Participant

    This is what happens when MBD retires.

    in reply to: Taivah for movies #1148104
    Joseph
    Participant

    There may be a heter available when there’s no alternative to making an equivalent parnassa that is certainly not applicable to other avoidable situations.

    in reply to: Boycotting Borsalino? #1070163
    Joseph
    Participant

    http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/headlines-breaking-stories/289113/borsalino-looks-to-stay-afloat-after-recent-financial-woes.html

    Looks like the boycott has been more successful than the organizers wildest imagination.

    in reply to: Any heter to not get drunk on Purim? #1219979
    Joseph
    Participant

    If I was trying to point out that there are many sourses which hold of some form of drinking then I would in fact group category two with category one.

    It’s more than merely “some form of drinking”; category two typically would be reaching the point of some form of drunkenness.

    I was being sarcastic.

    I understood you were being sarcastic. But even your use of sarcasm gives an indication of inclination.

    Which leads me to wonder what is so special about that.

    It is somewhat analogous to a Brisker or BMG talmud citing Rabbi Kook or Rabbi JB Soloveitchik for halachic support. RMK was about as far on the right side of the spectrum as any posek (i.e. see his positions regarding mesira.) In any event, that was just a cutesy comment.

    BTW, unless you are Sephardic why do you use non-Ashkenazic Hebew pronunciations (such as your referring to the “Beit” Yosef)?

    in reply to: Any heter to not get drunk on Purim? #1219977
    Joseph
    Participant

    The way I see it there are three categories:

    1) understand Rava ?????? and accept it ?????

    2) understand Rava not ?????? and accept it ?????

    3) don’t accept Rava ?????

    Within category two there can be huge range regarding how much you have to drink. My original point in this thread was that the vast majority of rishonim/acharonim fall into categories two and three.

    Why are you grouping categories two and three together when it would be more logical to group categories one and two together?

    I also think that when it comes to anyone who just quoted Rava’s lashon, we can’t know what there exact position is. The most we can know is that they brought down Rava’s statement ????? so they are not in category three. But we don’t know how they understood Rava’s statement.

    Why would they unclearly quote Rava’s lashon verbatim without further elucidation if they didn’t mean it in the simple sense?

    Oh good. Now I can tell everyone that they shouldn’t get drunk because…

    Ah! This is the problem – that people arguing against Purim drunkenness are often coming with an agenda as their starting point. They want to assur drunkenness on Purim and then go looking for shittos for fit that goal. And many even get upset at you merely for pointing out all the many valid shittos insisting on the halachic requirement to get drunk and all the real examples of contemporary and historic vintage of great and regular yiddden appropriately fulfilling this halacha by getting drunk on Purim.

    BTW, it was worth starting this thread if for nothing else than to have you cite Rav Menashe Klein zt’l.

    Ah Freilichen Shushan Purim un ah Gutte Erev Shabbos! (-:

    in reply to: I'm anti Zionist now #1158254
    Joseph
    Participant

    Did you ever why a high percentage of hesder boys go OTD an nowhere near a percent of chareidi boys go OTD?

    in reply to: thread for random things too small to be their own threads #1163295
    Joseph
    Participant

    1. Use Windows Add/Remove to get rid of McAfee.

    2. The software has a technical requirement that there be text in the body since the majority of threads logically need it and if it is blank it is most likely an error.

    3. He has a full head of hair.

    in reply to: do i get an aveirah if i don't do shnayim mikra? #1064223
    Joseph
    Participant

    The halacha is to be mavir sedra by saying each pasuk twice followed by the targum. Yet some replace the targum with rashi.

    in reply to: Any heter to not get drunk on Purim? #1219954
    Joseph
    Participant

    My posek didn’t invoke any points about majority/minority. That inconsequential side-point was my own commentary that could have been better worded to avoid your consistently making more out of it than it is.

    ????? ??? ?????

    ??”? – only ??”?. (Acknowledging, though, ?”? – ??? ???? ?????).

    Is it enough to mix up gematrias/stanzas/greatness of salvations etc.? I don’t know.

    IOW, the shittas may require more drinks than just DUI.

    P.S. This is “PUI”, so I’ll have to double-check this post later.

    in reply to: 127 #1063095
    Joseph
    Participant

    Moshiach’s tzeiten, rabbosai. Did anyone explore how “147” fits into this picture? The 20 crew members. You have the zionist leader in the U.S. Congress invoking Purim in comparison to the modern Persian leadership and a potential nuclear holocaust on the eve of Purim when the freaky 127 passenger plane make their emergency escape.

    And why is Soro Imeinu’s age well beyond the scope of this post?

    in reply to: Any heter to not get drunk on Purim? #1219952
    Joseph
    Participant

    Majority/minority of published teshuvos/positions is irrelevant. Additionally, you haven’t addressed the last sentence in my first paragraph.

    For purposes of this discussion, let’s say the shittos requiring you to be drunk enough to be considered driving under the influence of alcohol (had the person c’v been driving. Remember: there’s no chiyuv to drive – you can give the shaloch manos to your neighbor; the chiyuv is to get drunk.)

    in reply to: Davening while drunk #1063091
    Joseph
    Participant

    Or Simchas Torah…

    in reply to: drunk na a blazingf skingk #1225712
    Joseph
    Participant

    tswo dwrenkz morrs enif.

    in reply to: Why couldn't I live in dovid hamelechs times #1063338
    Joseph
    Participant

    …live in the most insolent and messed up generation ever.

    in reply to: Any heter to not get drunk on Purim? #1219948
    Joseph
    Participant

    PAA: Many seforim and sh”ut and writings of Geonim, Rishonim and Achronim have been long lost to the ages. (Sefer burnings, church confiscations, stam lost, censors, etc.) So starting to count beans and trying to figure out a “majority” is meaningless and pointless. (Not to mention you can even miss some of what is known.) Additionally, certain poskim/Rishonim/Achronim carry more weight than others and/or have been accepted by Klal Yisroel or portions thereof over others.

    The fact of the matter is that a chiyuv to get drunk on Purim (even putting aside the question of how drunk) has long long been accepted as the normative l’chatchila default widely accepted psak halacha in Klal Yisroel. In the new age of the last decade and a bit longer there’s been a strong push against getting drunk but even looking at current, recent and not long ago history you will find contemporary and historic examples of both laymen and gedolei yisroel getting plastered on Purim as the norm.

    in reply to: Any heter to not get drunk on Purim? #1219942
    Joseph
    Participant

    mw13: The Rema/MB say ad dlo yoda l’chatchila.

    in reply to: Snow on Purim #1063301
    Joseph
    Participant

    I don’t remember ever before there being a White Purim in New York. Does anyone know of when it ever seriously snowed on Purim in NY previously?

    in reply to: Any heter to not get drunk on Purim? #1219934
    Joseph
    Participant

    The ??????? ?????? and ??”? rule in accordance with ??? in ?????? that “???? ???? ?????? ?????? ?? ??? ??? ??? ???? ??? ????? ?????”.

    (??”? – to become intoxicated with wine.) The ???? ????? rules in accordance with the ??”?.

    in reply to: Any heter to not get drunk on Purim? #1219931
    Joseph
    Participant

    Well, then, I’ll use you as my Purim Rov!

    Freilichen Purim!!

    in reply to: Any heter to not get drunk on Purim? #1219928
    Joseph
    Participant

    I didn’t ask for, as I had no reason at the time, nor receive any b’dieveds.

    in reply to: Any heter to not get drunk on Purim? #1219927
    Joseph
    Participant

    All he told me is that I must get drunk.

    in reply to: Any heter to not get drunk on Purim? #1219925
    Joseph
    Participant

    Listen, I didn’t come here for a cut and paste job of dissenting opinions or a headcount game of who can find more opinions for their favorite psak. As I said, my posek paskens strictly in accordance with Shulchan Aruch, Rama and Mishna Brura. Not only is this, getting drunk on Purim, the standard normative default halacha from Shulchan Aruch and Rama but, moreso, it is the absolute ruling of my posek. I cannot and will not chas v’shalom challenge my posek.

    I need to know if despite my obligation to get drunk if my unique circumstance may, perhaps, allow me a heter to tone down slightly the quantity so that I might not reach the halachic standard of ad dlo yoda.

    Until I can have any confidence there is such a heter I am most obliged to follow my posek’s halachic ruling.

    L’Chaim!

Viewing 50 posts - 3,151 through 3,200 (of 4,220 total)