Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 12, 2015 3:39 am at 3:39 am in reply to: Rav Moshe Feinstein – a scion of Chasidishe stock #1063879JosephParticipant
Rav Moshe’s father was a Koidenover Chosid in his youth.
JosephParticipantEven if the watch has accelerometer/gyroscope or fitness tracking, those features can be disabled and set to display the time at all times.
JosephParticipantVeltz Meshugener: That is inaccurate. It isn’t the only halachicly valid option. It is proper though because it is a kiddush Hashem. And only that.
March 12, 2015 2:15 am at 2:15 am in reply to: Rav Moshe Feinstein – a scion of Chasidishe stock #1063876JosephParticipant“The Torah tells in Bamidbar (Rashi on second pasuk in beginning) that someone whose father is from one shevet and mother from a different shevet, goes according to the father’s shevet.”
Are you trying to say that Rav Moshe is from the Chasidishe shevet?
JosephParticipant“Because they are very large communities, the percentage growth in the Five Towns, Far Rockaway, Teaneck or West Hempstead might be smaller than Lakewood, but not the gross numbers”
The gross numbers as well as the percent of frum growth in Lakewood far exceeds the combined total of frum growth in the places you cited.
March 12, 2015 2:09 am at 2:09 am in reply to: Newly discovered: Only known video of the Chofetz Chaim #1064083JosephParticipantRav Elchonon Wasserman hy”d looks like himself.
JosephParticipantSo you can show off the “better” label to your friends.
JosephParticipantIs that why they’re emotional wrecks?
JosephParticipantShe’s absolutely correct.
JosephParticipantBarry: Jews are on average much wealthier and thus pay more taxes than the average non-Jew. NYC has 1.5 million Jews out of a population of 8 million.
cherrybim: Kol Yisroel Areivim Zeh Lazeh.
JosephParticipantDaMoshe, in relative terms, the frum growth in Lakewood is many multiple times the frum growth in all the areas you cited combined.
March 11, 2015 5:35 am at 5:35 am in reply to: Rav Moshe Feinstein – a scion of Chasidishe stock #1063860JosephParticipantDo Yerushalmi Litvaks wear shtreimels for the same reason Chasidim wear them?
JosephParticipantPerhaps the not-rich oilem can expand into a non-Jewish Brooklyn neighborhood until there’s a critical mass of frumkeit.
March 11, 2015 5:32 am at 5:32 am in reply to: Newly discovered: Only known video of the Chofetz Chaim #1064078JosephParticipantThe CC had a set of grandchildren that went OTD (during his lifetime).
JosephParticipantNu, if they make a model sans the tracking features (accelerometer, gyroscope, fitness tracker) you’re good to go on Shabbos?
March 10, 2015 11:48 am at 11:48 am in reply to: Rav Moshe Feinstein – a scion of Chasidishe stock #1063844JosephParticipantWhat does Rav Chaim consider himself?
JosephParticipantWhat’s the watch’s accelerometer doing for you? If merely keeping a record or log of activity, some motion detectors also keep a log/record of activity it detected. And if one of the watch’s models lacked the accelerometer, it would otherwise be Shabbos-proof?
March 10, 2015 3:43 am at 3:43 am in reply to: Talk? Or Keep Quiet? about negative things Yidden do to other Yidden??? #1063448JosephParticipantHow do you intend to combat it, an armed militia? This stuff has been going on for over half a century so however you’ve been combating it, clearly, it hasn’t been very successful.
JosephParticipantNew York City/State government is in large part funded by Yidden.
JosephParticipantAnd without the accelerometer it would have otherwise been alright? How’s the accelerometer different than having a motion detector in your home?
JosephParticipantThere are over a hundred shuls with mikvos in BP and Flatbush.
JosephParticipantAre they any better than the shirts for sale in the Hat Box and other heimishe merchants?
JosephParticipantIf one needs to relax and there are only activities that have women around improperly dressed (example the kids are in the house and freaking out and need to get out in the summer – everywhere there’s something).
This is premised on an open and complete falsehood. There are always always places to go that do not have immodesty being shoved in your face.
It is better to work in a frum environment. Agreed. But it’s not assur to not do so.
It most certainly is assur to work in an immodest environment if you can obtain an equivalent parnasa elsewhere without being subjected to the immodesty. Even if that required longer travel.
It could be that if there is no viable Kosher entertainment…
And even if there were no viable kosher entertainment it would be assur to utilize non-kosher entertainment, such as featuring immodesty.
Go to a country setting or secluded lake and enjoy the sunrise or fresh air and take a walk in the woods or a farm. You don’t need the electronic razzle and dazzle.
JosephParticipantBarry: You don’t want Israeli Arabs to be involuntarily drafted into the IDF but you do want Israeli Neteurei Karta Jews in the IDF?
The Chazon Ish never said what you attributed to him. Don’t believe Bennett’s media claims to have helped chareidim. Netanyahu could have made a coalition with UTJ and Shas instead of Lapid. And Chareidim cannot leagally work until their 27 years old since they didn’t join the IDF. Eliminate that legal restriction and you’ll see a lot more Chareidim working. They oppose zionism and the State so forget the idea of them joining the idf. And they only want to live in Eretz Yisroel (and have been since before the State) and have no citizenship elsewhere that any country will accept them, so forget the idea of expelling these Israeli citizens.
JosephParticipantWhat did you miss if you wouldn’t have appreciated it anyways?
JosephParticipantS&P 500 Index Fund with either Vanguard or Fidelity.
JosephParticipantYeah, but the boycott put the company over the top into bankruptcy court.
The power of Yidden!
JosephParticipantThere’s no chiyuv to drive while there is a chiyuv to get drunk. Don’t drive and do drink.
JosephParticipantThis is what happens when MBD retires.
JosephParticipantThere may be a heter available when there’s no alternative to making an equivalent parnassa that is certainly not applicable to other avoidable situations.
JosephParticipantLooks like the boycott has been more successful than the organizers wildest imagination.
JosephParticipantIf I was trying to point out that there are many sourses which hold of some form of drinking then I would in fact group category two with category one.
It’s more than merely “some form of drinking”; category two typically would be reaching the point of some form of drunkenness.
I was being sarcastic.
I understood you were being sarcastic. But even your use of sarcasm gives an indication of inclination.
Which leads me to wonder what is so special about that.
It is somewhat analogous to a Brisker or BMG talmud citing Rabbi Kook or Rabbi JB Soloveitchik for halachic support. RMK was about as far on the right side of the spectrum as any posek (i.e. see his positions regarding mesira.) In any event, that was just a cutesy comment.
BTW, unless you are Sephardic why do you use non-Ashkenazic Hebew pronunciations (such as your referring to the “Beit” Yosef)?
JosephParticipantThe way I see it there are three categories:
1) understand Rava ?????? and accept it ?????
2) understand Rava not ?????? and accept it ?????
3) don’t accept Rava ?????
Within category two there can be huge range regarding how much you have to drink. My original point in this thread was that the vast majority of rishonim/acharonim fall into categories two and three.
Why are you grouping categories two and three together when it would be more logical to group categories one and two together?
I also think that when it comes to anyone who just quoted Rava’s lashon, we can’t know what there exact position is. The most we can know is that they brought down Rava’s statement ????? so they are not in category three. But we don’t know how they understood Rava’s statement.
Why would they unclearly quote Rava’s lashon verbatim without further elucidation if they didn’t mean it in the simple sense?
Oh good. Now I can tell everyone that they shouldn’t get drunk because…
Ah! This is the problem – that people arguing against Purim drunkenness are often coming with an agenda as their starting point. They want to assur drunkenness on Purim and then go looking for shittos for fit that goal. And many even get upset at you merely for pointing out all the many valid shittos insisting on the halachic requirement to get drunk and all the real examples of contemporary and historic vintage of great and regular yiddden appropriately fulfilling this halacha by getting drunk on Purim.
BTW, it was worth starting this thread if for nothing else than to have you cite Rav Menashe Klein zt’l.
Ah Freilichen Shushan Purim un ah Gutte Erev Shabbos! (-:
JosephParticipantDid you ever why a high percentage of hesder boys go OTD an nowhere near a percent of chareidi boys go OTD?
March 6, 2015 10:00 pm at 10:00 pm in reply to: thread for random things too small to be their own threads #1163295JosephParticipant1. Use Windows Add/Remove to get rid of McAfee.
2. The software has a technical requirement that there be text in the body since the majority of threads logically need it and if it is blank it is most likely an error.
3. He has a full head of hair.
March 6, 2015 9:55 pm at 9:55 pm in reply to: do i get an aveirah if i don't do shnayim mikra? #1064223JosephParticipantThe halacha is to be mavir sedra by saying each pasuk twice followed by the targum. Yet some replace the targum with rashi.
JosephParticipantMy posek didn’t invoke any points about majority/minority. That inconsequential side-point was my own commentary that could have been better worded to avoid your consistently making more out of it than it is.
????? ??? ?????
??”? – only ??”?. (Acknowledging, though, ?”? – ??? ???? ?????).
Is it enough to mix up gematrias/stanzas/greatness of salvations etc.? I don’t know.
IOW, the shittas may require more drinks than just DUI.
P.S. This is “PUI”, so I’ll have to double-check this post later.
JosephParticipantMoshiach’s tzeiten, rabbosai. Did anyone explore how “147” fits into this picture? The 20 crew members. You have the zionist leader in the U.S. Congress invoking Purim in comparison to the modern Persian leadership and a potential nuclear holocaust on the eve of Purim when the freaky 127 passenger plane make their emergency escape.
And why is Soro Imeinu’s age well beyond the scope of this post?
JosephParticipantMajority/minority of published teshuvos/positions is irrelevant. Additionally, you haven’t addressed the last sentence in my first paragraph.
For purposes of this discussion, let’s say the shittos requiring you to be drunk enough to be considered driving under the influence of alcohol (had the person c’v been driving. Remember: there’s no chiyuv to drive – you can give the shaloch manos to your neighbor; the chiyuv is to get drunk.)
JosephParticipantOr Simchas Torah…
JosephParticipanttswo dwrenkz morrs enif.
JosephParticipant…live in the most insolent and messed up generation ever.
JosephParticipantPAA: Many seforim and sh”ut and writings of Geonim, Rishonim and Achronim have been long lost to the ages. (Sefer burnings, church confiscations, stam lost, censors, etc.) So starting to count beans and trying to figure out a “majority” is meaningless and pointless. (Not to mention you can even miss some of what is known.) Additionally, certain poskim/Rishonim/Achronim carry more weight than others and/or have been accepted by Klal Yisroel or portions thereof over others.
The fact of the matter is that a chiyuv to get drunk on Purim (even putting aside the question of how drunk) has long long been accepted as the normative l’chatchila default widely accepted psak halacha in Klal Yisroel. In the new age of the last decade and a bit longer there’s been a strong push against getting drunk but even looking at current, recent and not long ago history you will find contemporary and historic examples of both laymen and gedolei yisroel getting plastered on Purim as the norm.
JosephParticipantmw13: The Rema/MB say ad dlo yoda l’chatchila.
JosephParticipantI don’t remember ever before there being a White Purim in New York. Does anyone know of when it ever seriously snowed on Purim in NY previously?
JosephParticipantThe ??????? ?????? and ??”? rule in accordance with ??? in ?????? that “???? ???? ?????? ?????? ?? ??? ??? ??? ???? ??? ????? ?????”.
(??”? – to become intoxicated with wine.) The ???? ????? rules in accordance with the ??”?.
JosephParticipantWell, then, I’ll use you as my Purim Rov!
Freilichen Purim!!
JosephParticipantI didn’t ask for, as I had no reason at the time, nor receive any b’dieveds.
JosephParticipantAll he told me is that I must get drunk.
JosephParticipantListen, I didn’t come here for a cut and paste job of dissenting opinions or a headcount game of who can find more opinions for their favorite psak. As I said, my posek paskens strictly in accordance with Shulchan Aruch, Rama and Mishna Brura. Not only is this, getting drunk on Purim, the standard normative default halacha from Shulchan Aruch and Rama but, moreso, it is the absolute ruling of my posek. I cannot and will not chas v’shalom challenge my posek.
I need to know if despite my obligation to get drunk if my unique circumstance may, perhaps, allow me a heter to tone down slightly the quantity so that I might not reach the halachic standard of ad dlo yoda.
Until I can have any confidence there is such a heter I am most obliged to follow my posek’s halachic ruling.
L’Chaim!
-
AuthorPosts