Joseph

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 2,101 through 2,150 (of 4,220 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Is the Outrage Over The Killing of Cecil the Lion Justified? #1154154
    Joseph
    Participant

    Killing animals for sport IS outrageous and should be made illegal. No animal should be killed for no useful purpose. Killing animals for food or skin for clothing is perfectly correct.

    This guy killed for nothing but sport. The outrage is well placed.

    OTOH, the animal rights wackos and psychopaths at PETA called for this guy to be hanged. (On their twitter feed.) Even though what he did was wrong and should be punishable (IF illegal as it should be), it isn’t and shouldn’t be a capital offense. And it demonstrates that the animal crazies value animal life over human life, and are thus far crazier than these hunters.

    in reply to: Contact Rabbi Lawrence Kelemen #1093886
    Joseph
    Participant

    There’s no need to guess. ywncr.com is unregistered, doesn’t exist and is still available for anyone to register. (Get it before brother sends the email!)

    in reply to: ??????????????? ??? ???? ?? ???? ?? ?? ?? ?? #1093929
    Joseph
    Participant

    Superpowers are kishif (magic) and assur. Anyone practicing it is chayiv misa.

    in reply to: Assorted Tzniyus/Pritzus Questions #1094270
    Joseph
    Participant

    Of course, there is chiyuv lehalachah – not just a nice minhag, but a chiyuv – to avoid any unnecessary interaction with immodesty. Going to a mixed beach where there is certain pritzus is assur for any Jewish male. I think the only hetter is going to be ?? ???? ??? ??????; if it is possible to order clothes without going to a shopping mall in the summer, you may well be mechuyav to do that.

    Agreed. The question, how do we define “unnecessary”? For example, what if I can get a nicer or cheaper shirt in the mall?

    I don’t understand the doubt. Is there really a question whether it is permitted to violate shmiras einayim in order to secure a “nicer shirt”? That’s a “necessity”?

    in reply to: ??????????????? ??? ???? ?? ???? ?? ?? ?? ?? #1093923
    Joseph
    Participant

    A tomboy?

    in reply to: Showers in the 9 days #1094073
    Joseph
    Participant

    Sam, I explained to you the point mdd is driving at. That not every hashkafa is acceptable.

    in reply to: Lakewood school board State monitor (and Five Towns) #1094476
    Joseph
    Participant

    The government cannot impose celebrating Christian holidays on any student or anyone else. Nor can they impose any diet on anyone.

    lc: Circus didn’t make a threat; he made a point.

    in reply to: Assorted Tzniyus/Pritzus Questions #1094263
    Joseph
    Participant

    Or some people won’t like the answers to the questions. So they’d rather it not be asked.

    in reply to: Showers in the 9 days #1094065
    Joseph
    Participant

    Sam – mdd’s point is to prove to you from these two Gemorah’s that hashkofo is important and that people need to have the correct hashkofo not the wrong hashkofo.

    in reply to: The IRAN DEAL and THE LETTER TO KILL THE JEWS #1093892
    Joseph
    Participant

    So it’s pretty simple. On Purim Israel’s gonna bomb Tehran.

    in reply to: Showers in the 9 days #1094058
    Joseph
    Participant

    Sam: What is your source that Rava was wrong about R’ Tarfon and the Tanna was wrong about R’ Akiva in criticizing R’ Tarfon and R’ Akiva for ever expressing their shitta?

    in reply to: shidduchim #1097291
    Joseph
    Participant

    Marriage isn’t something to push off.

    in reply to: looking for Gemara PDF #1093447
    Joseph
    Participant

    Does Hebrewbooks publish historical Hebrew books from the Haskala?

    in reply to: shidduchim #1097288
    Joseph
    Participant

    +1

    in reply to: Showers in the 9 days #1094055
    Joseph
    Participant

    My vote is that it Rova is more likely correct in the Gemora with R’ Tarfon, and the same regarding R’ Akiva, then Rova being wrong and Sam being correct.

    in reply to: Issues of National Security and Foreign Policy #1093444
    Joseph
    Participant

    sushibagel: You’re going to need a national security background check conducted by the Department of Homeland Security via the FBI.

    in reply to: Issues of National Security and Foreign Policy #1093440
    Joseph
    Participant

    Of course. The original dedication still stands in your name. Though you should answer the OP’s three questions, as it is dedicated to you. (Consider that to be your clearance. Though I hadn’t indicated it being required.)

    in reply to: Issues of National Security and Foreign Policy #1093437
    Joseph
    Participant

    akuperman: This thread’s for you. (Re-dedication.)

    in reply to: It's only an online forum #1095433
    Joseph
    Participant

    akuperman: You inadvertently left your webcam running. You should probably turn it off.

    in reply to: The ends don't justify the means #1093429
    Joseph
    Participant

    in reply to: The ends don't justify the means #1093428
    Joseph
    Participant

    Emes L’Ya’akov (Bereishis 27:12):

    in reply to: What is the Temple institute? #1094287
    Joseph
    Participant

    They disobey gedolei haposkim in organizing tours of the Har HaBayis. Their official plan is to knock down the mosque and build a Temple so it is ready for Moshiach.

    in reply to: abusing reporters #1093431
    Joseph
    Participant

    Ignore them.

    in reply to: Lakewood school board State monitor (and Five Towns) #1094463
    Joseph
    Participant

    lc:

    1. Statistically, there are likely to be more students living between over a mile up to two and a half miles from the yeshiva as there are students living a mile or less from the school. People do not choose a Yeshiva because it is the closest Yeshiva to their home.

    2. Shuls are much closer to people’s homes, and there are far more of them, than yeshivos.

    3. Some children speak Yiddish as their primary language. Some even as their only language at a young age.

    in reply to: Replacement idiom for "when the fat lady sings" #1134823
    Joseph
    Participant

    Singing ladies aren’t tznius.

    in reply to: Reporting Abusers #1093615
    Joseph
    Participant

    I would just like to add to that that the only conspirators are the ones who use words like “few”, “handful”, “uncommon” and “isolated cases” when discussing abuse, abusers and outright protectors.

    There you go, NeutiquamErro. You have just been identified as a conspirator protecting abusers.

    in reply to: Paying to hear a shiur #1093474
    Joseph
    Participant

    We can use the Hillel example that DY correctly cited as our guideline. There can be a fee for the shiur. But those unable to afford it should be exempted from the fee.

    in reply to: Paying to hear a shiur #1093464
    Joseph
    Participant

    apy: A shiur is “entertainment”?

    in reply to: Paying to hear a shiur #1093461
    Joseph
    Participant

    ca: ein hochi nomi that he couldn’t afford it.

    After the incident of Hillel taking unofficial steps to circumvent/avoid the fee, he was officially permanently exempted from the shiur fee.

    in reply to: Paying to hear a shiur #1093457
    Joseph
    Participant

    DY: Yet Hillel took steps to hear the shiur while avoiding the fee.

    in reply to: In honor of Tisha B'av. What you respect about… #1165197
    Joseph
    Participant

    I respect the women who spend Tisha B’Av preparing a sumptuous feast so that their husbands can break their fast in fashion.

    in reply to: Lakewood school board State monitor (and Five Towns) #1094459
    Joseph
    Participant

    zsdad: There are tons of frum girls, including many who speak yiddish, in NY & NJ who are fully qualified and certified special ed teachers. So many, in fact, that some of them can’t find jobs.

    Syag: In many States, including NY, the child has the right to be taught in the language he is fluent in. Even if it is a language other than English and Spanish.

    in reply to: Reporting Abusers #1093610
    Joseph
    Participant

    Neutiquam: Well stated and 100% accurate.

    in reply to: Pollard #1094170
    Joseph
    Participant
    in reply to: Lakewood school board State monitor (and Five Towns) #1094452
    Joseph
    Participant

    What if Flatbush makes sure no one sells homes to Muslims since they only eat Halal meat and that would cause the butchers to lose out? Would the Department of Justice/HUD consider that an anti-Muslim violation of the Fair Housing Act?

    in reply to: Why do women like flowers? #1151372
    Joseph
    Participant

    RY23, Mod29 is correct in that you made a bad assumption here. I am not a woman. (Please give the flowers to golfer.) So when golfer called me dense on the last post of the previous page she was not calling a woman dense. I, on the other hand, subsequently only asked if she is.

    in reply to: Why do women like flowers? #1151369
    Joseph
    Participant

    Are you dense, golfer? Those threads, especially the first, have a whole host of sources directly cited with verbatim translated quotations, from a whole host of Seforim that you’ve heard of (Rambam, Gemora et al) and others you probably did not. Why not take a look at them and read the sources before spouting.

    in reply to: Lakewood school board State monitor (and Five Towns) #1094447
    Joseph
    Participant

    DaMoshe: In Ramapo, Monroe and Lakewood, I know of no case where the infrastructure became insufficient due to the quick growth. The water kept running, the electric kept flowing and the sewers didn’t overflow. Certainly not to any greater extent than many other non-Jewish towns. So while we keep hearing the mantra “the infrastructure won’t be able to keep up” by opponents using that claim for well over 25 years already, the reality is that the infrastructure has kept up – despite the great amount of growth.

    The school funding issue you describe is a formula problem. The State formula doesn’t account for private school students to determine funding; it only accounts for public school students to determine funding. The law mandates certain services for all children, public or private. So the problem that needs to be fixed by the legislature is fixing the formula to account for the fact that there are children in private schools.

    Regarding your Ramapo example, both in ’08 and ’12, by your own cited figures, they were in both years above State average spending! (Of course the spending growth didn’t keep up; that’s because of the aforementioned formula problem. And a 7.5% increase in four years is not small potatoes in any event.)

    gaw: Your point is well taken but you have to remember increasing property/school taxes is a public referendum decided upon by the voters. The realpolitik reality is that voters who are denied funding for their children’s school education are unlikely to vote for a school tax increase. The voters take the position that the government should fund their children’s secular education in private schools (or charter schools). They’re not asking for the religious studies to be funded; but they do want the secular studies in private school to be tax funded. And it isn’t. In some States (i.e. Florida and some other Republican States) they do fund private school education (for the secular studies portion.) So it certainly is legal to do so, yet many States refuse to do it. So if it is legal to fund their schools and the government doesn’t, naturally they will vote down school tax initiatives.

    in reply to: Lakewood school board State monitor (and Five Towns) #1094444
    Joseph
    Participant

    DaMoshe: Considering the fact that they do have large families, and the (many) children get married and need homes for their own new (large) families, housing needs to be built. Somewhere. That much is obvious. So if wherever the Jews go the locals wont want them because their families are too big, they grow too fast, and they use too much resources, should the Jews move into the sea?

    What you describe is the natural phenomenon of growth that will happen anywhere we live. And Jews need to live near fellow observant Jews for (walking distance) shuls, yeshivos, etc.

    As far as public school funding, that is a red herring. The Jews pay property (and other) taxes to pay for public school education. These Jews don’t send their children to public schools. So the PS are coming out way ahead with religious Jews paying for PS but not using the PSs. As far as them getting special ed and busing for their children, they’re entitled to it by law as much as anyone else. Just because they have long peyos or speak yiddish doesn’t disentitle Jewish special ed needing children from obtaining those services. And, remember, the community overall is putting far more money into the public school, without using the schools (other than special ed), than the average non-Jewish families that are sending children to PS and thus getting about a $20,000 per year, per child free PS education. So calling a spade a spade indicates that Jews underutilize and receive less public school benefits, while their net pay into the local public school system is way above average.

    If they don’t want Jews because the Jews do things that are uniquely Jewish, that I would call anti-semitism. But even if you are too shy to call it that, call it what you want, but Jewish growth isn’t going to stop because some locals don’t like it.

    in reply to: talk about assumptions! #1093114
    Joseph
    Participant

    Is one of the new rules here that assumptions or even being wrong about an issue is reason for deletion?

    No. But you wrote a very harsh, accusatory, personal attack on people in regard to a very sensitive topic, making some very general, loose assumptions that may not apply at all and would therefore cause undo pain to a huge number of people. I do not consider that post-worthy. Add to that that OP’s cannot be edited, and that you are fully conscious when you are typing, leaving deleting as the only option.

    in reply to: Pruzbul, shmitta, debt elimination and theft #1100140
    Joseph
    Participant

    If that is the case, why doesn’t the Torah permit beis din to enforce his remaining debt, if it is still a valid debt post-shmitta?

    in reply to: Pruzbul, shmitta, debt elimination and theft #1100138
    Joseph
    Participant

    If the thief was sold as an eved ivri half a year before shmitta, and shmitta freed him while his victim didn’t receive full repayment of his loss from the theft by the thief’s sale as an eved ivri, the thief is still mechuyiv to repay the remaining balance (i.e. theft value minus sale price as an eved ivri) even though beis din cannot enforce that?

    in reply to: Why do women like flowers? #1151365
    Joseph
    Participant
    in reply to: Pruzbul, shmitta, debt elimination and theft #1100136
    Joseph
    Participant

    Yet shmitta does end one’s status as an eved ivri resulting from theft.

    in reply to: Jewish advertising and marketing #1093398
    Joseph
    Participant

    You have my vote, lc.

    in reply to: Brochos #1093079
    Joseph
    Participant

    Make a knas for yourself. Anytime you missed saying a bracha, you send $25 to your least favorite yeshiva.

    in reply to: Why do women like flowers? #1151361
    Joseph
    Participant

    A husband is a rebbe to his wife and children.

    in reply to: Jewish advertising and marketing #1093395
    Joseph
    Participant

    As far as I’m concerned, commercial advertising should be banished.

    in reply to: Why do women like flowers? #1151359
    Joseph
    Participant

    Advising a wife (or children) to ask the husband about a halachic or hashkafic issue shouldn’t be any more insulting to females than advising to ask your rabbi. A husband is the halachic authority in the home. That is part of the normal duties of a husband/father. His wife should be consulting him on halachic questions. If a rabbi needs to be consulted, it is part of his responsibilities to make that inquiry.

    in reply to: Lakewood school board State monitor (and Five Towns) #1094437
    Joseph
    Participant

    gaw: Where should the Jews move to? In Monroe and Bloomingburg they want to stop the Jews from expanding because it is “rural”. In Ramapo and Lakewood those opposed to the Jews expanding say it is “suburban”. Boro Park is urban and like the rest of NYC there’s physically nowhere to build. So the rural don’t want building because they want to stay rural; the suburbans don’t want building because don’t want to become urban; and the urban is saturated.

    Or is it that they don’t want the Jews? Or at least those Jews’ Jews who dress and act funny and refuse to integrate into the melting pot.

Viewing 50 posts - 2,101 through 2,150 (of 4,220 total)