Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Is that the same as the Sambatyon river?
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/the-ten-lost-tribes-1
Cheer up!
So judgemental.
English, please.
Is there a good reason for bottled water to have a hechsher?
Jews rioting can only backfire. And far far more blacks are imprisoned than Jews.
Midoraisa a husband can divorce a wife who insists on eating herring. But not vice versa. (This is more relevant to Sefardim who don’t have Rabbeinu Gershom.)
Chasidishe women like it.
Trust me, if I wanted to get back I would’ve answered ages ago. In fact I did respond to your comment shortly after you posted it. And if this was intended to get back you can be sure you wouldn’t have gotten the winky. 😉
i don’t know who she is but my guess is that we do not have a single thought, belief or ideal in common.
But you’ve answered for me here better than I could myself with the crux of your response, even though you thought responding for yourself. (As an aside Moishele is neither satmar nor nk. He is stam a meshugana from Europe.)
syag – very often when i picture you i have an image of that rabba sara hurwitz gal from yeshivat maharat . any relation 😉
Perhaps Health is automotive engineering professional and he is relating his career vehicular experience on the combustive qualities of automobiles.
Of course by talking to him. We’re two professionals. We speak the shprach.
DY: This is no joking matter. The coffee room is a place for serious discussion.
Sedate him.
Bump.
Does anyone know what the weather will be like today?
Impossible to be done in a constitutional way, as I explained.
The St. Louis people would’ve fit in just fine in the lower east side at the time.
A call to OU and Star-K resulted in both rabbis ruling that one cannot drink coffee from Starbucks that sell nonkosher/meat products.
ubiq, the Jews won in court and had the Eruv ban in Westhampton overturned because the ordinance banning the Eruv was an unconstitutional interference of government in religion. There is no roundabout way to make a ban that is intended to inhibit a religious practice be constitutional by pretending the law was enacted for an allowable secular purpose when the true intent, even if not admitted and outright denied, was religious based discrimination. It is unconstitutional on the face of it.
You are are asking about hypothetical laws that can’t be legal any way you cut it.
It would be illegal under State and Federal law and unconstitutional. I don’t even understand why you’re asking.
ubiq, what if KJ passed a law that you can hang 10 non-Jews every Purim? That sounds like a bad law. I dunno, I’m sure we can both conjure up many hypothetically bad laws.
ubiq, please cite where in the U.S. Code of pre-WWII, Federal law inhibited immigration on the basis of Communist affiliation. To the best of my knowledge that did not occur.
As a practical matter no African-American wants to purchase a home in KJ, and as a realistic matter none have ever tried, because they’d feel completely out of place where virtually 100% of the population is Satmar Chasidic Jewish and they’d be the only person out of tens of thousands of people who are not. So none have tried.
The homes in KJ are privately owned and can be sold by the private homeowner to whomever they want. So any issues on this regard would simply be a matter between the private owner of 429 Torah Avenue (or whatever the address of the home in question) and would not be a public municipal or governmental matter.
Mass anti-communist hysteria started after WWII with the onset of the Cold War, not during or before WWII. But even anti-communist hysteria wasn’t a serious fear about immigrants being commies.