Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipant
Most importantly, as I have repeatedly mentioned, the main L”H issue was not the blue shirts and that is not what I was protesting. What I was protesting, and the reason I am asking that the thread be deleted is that Am Yisrael and a particular institution were derided (as I mentioned in post #943 above and as Avrum in MD mentioned).
That is the main issue here and the moderators have not yet responded to that.
Thank you.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantFurther to the above post (960), in addition to my researching the matter, as I already pointed out, one is not allowed to believe it since one is not allowed to believe loshon hora. So even if he hadn’t written that Lakewood schools don’t accept girls whose fathers wear blue shirts, it would be assur to believe whatever it is he did write, since what he wrote was written as loshon hora (in order to put down Am Yisrael and a particular institution).
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipant29- I agree with you that one must be very careful when quoting others and/or accusing others of l”h that one clearly understand what was written. I have also seen that to be a problem in the CR.
In this case, I fail to see how that applies. The OP stated that when his daughter applied to the school, he was asked if he wears blue shirts. He responded that he does but only because he has to for work. Their response was that he must change as soon as he leaves work.
This was clearly not a random conversation between two people. The OP felt it necessary to mention that it was the school his daughter was applying to and not a random person on the street. He also felt it necessary to mention that the school told him this as he was applying to the school.
It is clear that the school was telling this to him as a parent in the school, and that they were telling him this as a matter of policy – the policy being that if wants to be a school parent, he is not allowed to wear blue shirts (except when he is as work).
I do not see any other of reading his words.
Btw, when I researched the matter, I did describe the situation as it was written (that he must change his shirts as soon as he leaves work), and I was told that they all of the girls’ high schools in Lakewood accept girls whose fathers wear blue shirts (not just at work), and therefore the story can’t be true.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantThere is one other point that is very important to mention. I did research the matter and the entire story was completely false. There is no girls’ high school in Lakewood that refuses to take students whose fathers wear blue shirts.
I also want to remind everyone that according to halacha, one is not allowed to believe loshon hora. How is it possible to believe that the person is lying? The Chofetz Chaim explains by pointing out that anyone who speaks loshon hora is a rasha. He says that since we know the speaker is a rasha by virtue of the fact that he is speaking loshon hora, there is no reason to believe that he is telling the truth.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantAvrum in MD – thank you for answering. The issue was the fact that the specific institution and Klal Yisrael were publicly derided. So if you are correct about Future Potus’s question and answer, no Rav in fact said that it was okay. In that case, it is a clear-cut case of loshon hora and it was definitely both permitted and obligatory for me to respond.
It is also obligatory for the moderators to delete it. It is stated on the Coffee Room rules that loshon hora is deleted. The moderators do often delete loshon hora when it is pointed out to them. I had been under the impression that any time that loshon hora gets through, it is an oversight, and that as soon as it is pointed out, the moderators would delete it.
Am I incorrect about that? Is there a reason why the moderators haven’t yet deleted it? Perhaps you have an explanation? If so, I would be more than happy to hear it.
Thank you.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantApushatyaid: “Why this was reported as “news” is beyond me. The over reaction by some while not surprising, is also beyond me. Do you learn in ponovezh? Why do you care?
Thank you YWN for facilitating the badmouthing of a Yeshiva and it’s roshei Yeshiva. (perhaps this is why the Yeshiva is banning the “technology” all it does is facilitate leitsanus and the bad mouthing of others).”
Maskim. The spreading of motzi shem ra about Am Yisrael by websites that label themselves as Frum is probably the biggest problem with internet today. It also may well be one of the biggest problems facing Am Yisrael today. The Rabbanim whom I’ve spoken to so far about this issue are very upset about it.
That is why I (in conjunction with Gedolei Yisrael) am trying to do whatever we can to stop it.
May 11, 2017 9:10 pm at 9:10 pm in reply to: What would you say if someone said this to you? #1274408Lilmod UlelamaidParticipant“No. It is deeply offensive to be offended on the behalf of someone else. It is stealing their voice.”
No, it’s not. We are all inter-connected and we are supposed to care about others as much as ourselves. That includes feeling hurt when they are hurt.
May 11, 2017 9:10 pm at 9:10 pm in reply to: What would you say if someone said this to you? #1274406Lilmod UlelamaidParticipant“AND WHAT I SAID SHOULDN’T HAVE BEEN OFFENSIVE TO ANYONE, IN GROUP OR NOT,”
“Unfortunately, we don’t get to be the arbiter of what another person finds hurtful or offensive.”
“Would you be okay with it if you were there while someone mentioned Jews in a neutral way and a goy got up and said wow that’s offensive some of us have to deal with Jewish people every day?”
That’s actually an interesting discussion. I once mentioned to a friend that someone once was offended by something I did, and I don’t think she should have been. My friend responded that you can’t say that someone shouldn’t be offended by something.
But I think she is wrong. If someone tells me that she is offended by the fact that I wear shoes, she is wrong, and I should not stop wearing shoes and I should not feel bad about it.
On the other hand, it is important to be sensitive to other’s feelings (even when it makes no sense to you) and try not to do things that offend them when possible. But that has to be balanced by a realistic sense of the extent to which it makes sense for you to take their feelings into account without hurting yourself.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantI’m still waiting for an explanation regarding where Lubavitch comes into this. Does snag somehow refer to non-Lubavitchers??? I think I once heard that SNAG is an acronym for Sensitive New- Age Guy. But that has nothing to do with Chabad.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantI don’t know if people notice capitalization so quickly. My name got changed from lower-case to capital and I didn’t even notice.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantI don’t remember what I learned. I think it’s technically less of an issur than eating treif, but it could be that given the choice it’s better to eat treif even though it’s technically a bigger issur. Kind of like how it’s worse for a man to marry to goy than it is to marry a Jew who doesn’t keep taharas hamishpacha even though the second one is technically a bigger aveira.
But I don’t remember and I might be wrong (about both issues). I’m sure some of the men here have learned it. Ask them.
May 11, 2017 12:38 am at 12:38 am in reply to: Earning Your Acronym like Rambam, Ramban, Rashba… #1273969Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantWhen I was about 7 years old and learned about Rashi, I decided that I was going to be like Rashi and write a peirush on the Siddur (since the Chumash had already been done by Rashi). I gave myself an acronym (my initials) and sat down to work. I had a chiddush on Ma Tovu, but I couldn’t write it down right away because I decided I had to start from Modah Ani.
Well, guess what? I never got up to Ma Tovu because my sisters called me out to play before I got very far. And I no longer remember what my chiddush on Ma Tovu was. Oh, well.
May 11, 2017 12:20 am at 12:20 am in reply to: Tzniusness of Transparent Bubble Umbrellas 🗨️⛱️ #1273954Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantI can’t imagine he is planning to spend the whole day there. And I still don’t think you can tell much from this photo.
May 11, 2017 12:20 am at 12:20 am in reply to: What would you say if someone said this to you? #1273955Lilmod UlelamaidParticipant“They weren’t even in the group that it was supposedly offensive to”
That shouldn’t make any difference. We are supposed to identify with others and feel offended when others are put down. In fact, we should be more upset when someone else is put down.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantlol. very true.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantWhat’s Boro Park?
May 11, 2017 12:19 am at 12:19 am in reply to: Credit Card “Shtick/Fraud” – is it stealing? 💳👮 #1273953Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantAsk a sheilah to a qualified Poseik who is known to be makpid on yashrus.
Since it’s been 9 years, I hope you have done so by now.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantI would too.
May 10, 2017 11:50 pm at 11:50 pm in reply to: Tzniusness of Transparent Bubble Umbrellas 🗨️⛱️ #1273938Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantlol.
May 10, 2017 11:50 pm at 11:50 pm in reply to: Tzniusness of Transparent Bubble Umbrellas 🗨️⛱️ #1273937Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantand you would have to see them around other people and see if they stand out in the crowd. I don’t think there’s any way to see that in a picture.
May 10, 2017 11:24 pm at 11:24 pm in reply to: Tzniusness of Transparent Bubble Umbrellas 🗨️⛱️ #1273917Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantLB- I don’t think we can tell much from this photo. First of all, we don’t have a clear view of the person. Second of all, that wouldn’t be enough, because we would have to be able to see how they look in their surroundings, since the issue is about whether or not they stand out. I don’t know if that’s something that one can see in any photo, but we certainly can’t see it here.
I’m also surprised by your comment. I had no idea what a bubble umbrella looked like before, but you did, and you thought they were untznius. If you already knew what they looked like, what did you gain from seeing this photo, and how did it make you change your mind?
Disclaimer: I am not trying to imply that they are untznius. I have no idea, since I have never seen one in real life (although my guess is that they are fine). I am just wondering why you are so sure that this photo is a proof that they are.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantThere are a lot of things kids never learn. We are supposed to be learning our whole lives. There are many things I haven’t learned yet. And actually, the halachos of cannibalism is something that I did learn at some point, despite the fact that there are many halachos that come up more frequently that I haven’t yet learned 🙁
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantTOL – the reference was to serving Hashem with Joy not with Ahavas Hashem. You are correct that Yiras Hashem (or at least a certain level of Yiras Hashem) comes first.
But that had nothing to do with what I was talking about. The Joy should always be there, whether we are serving Hashem with Yirah or with Ahava.
True Yiras Hashem is joyous.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantWhat? I’m still lost…
The headline is: SouthWest reports few snags with switches to new system.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantI would just add that I don’t think the point is that people who find it easier to learn are more likely to go to Gan Eden than people who have ADHD and CAN’T sit.
The nimshal is conceptual, not necessarily literal. And the point (as I see it) is that the more steeped in Ruchnius one is and the more one DESIRES to be able to sit and learn and is looking for the day when he will go to Gan Eden and rid himself of his physical limitations (including his ADHD), so that he is able to sit and learn, to that extent he will earn Gan Eden.
I am just writing that to clear up possible misconceptions that any readers might have, and not because I thought you thought otherwise, Iacisrmma.
May 10, 2017 8:15 pm at 8:15 pm in reply to: Raise your hand if you actually do fit perfectly in with the system 🙋 #1273772Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantSo what if I did okay in school (depending on the year, the subject and my mood), didn’t have a uniform (I graduated high school before most Bais Yaakov’s had uniforms), am not married yet but hope to be so one day, do not know yet how I will meet my husband although I prefer non-traditional methods, am not sure what the jargon is (although I have a tendency to throw out words like “chap” and “shkoyach”. does that count?), wear black tights in the winter and black knee-hi’s in the summer?
Does that mean that I am not a model citizen? Does it mean I don’t fit in? Is being a model citizen the same as fitting in? Can I be a model citizen even if I don’t fit in?
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantI once went out with a guy who shushed me up in the middle of a sentence because he was listening to someone else’s conversation and wanted to hear what they were saying.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantit was never decided that it’s not cruel to withhold a get. In fact, the majority of the posters agreed that it was cruel.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantMentsch1, Avram, Yichusdik, GadolHadorah, YYTZ , RebYidd, and Zaltzvasser +1!
Lenny, please listen to all of these posters – find a Rav, go for therapy, read Garden of Peace, and most importantly don’t force someone to stay in a marriage against her will.
Hatzlacha!
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantnice!
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantThere was a man who kept Halacha but always did things the most “b’dieved” way possible. He dies and goes up for judgment. He is told that since he kept halacha, he gets to go to Gan Eden. He asks if he can first see gehinnom (I don’t know why, but in these kinds of jokes, people always ask that).
So the malach takes him over to a fiery pit, he leans over and sees all the neshamas being tortured. He loses his balance and falls. So he starts screaming, “Take me out! I’m not supposed to go to gehinnom!”
So the malach responds, “Well l’chatchila, you weren’t supposed to go to gehinnom, but b’dieved……
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantThey are not supposed to be a contradiction. If they are, you are doing something wrong, and the fear is not real fear but rather of an OCD nature.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantWTP – nice. Thanks!
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantRY – Thank you for starting a “real” topic as opposed to a troll one. I like it when you say real things.
You have a lot of worthwhile things to say. You should do it more often.Shkoyach!
May 10, 2017 7:37 pm at 7:37 pm in reply to: Do you believe you are right about everything you believe? #1273749Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantI don’t understand the question. If you believe something, then of course you think you are right. It’s possible to not be sure if you are right about something, but in that case, it means that you don’t fully believe it. To the extent that you believe something, you think you are right.
May 10, 2017 7:37 pm at 7:37 pm in reply to: Do you believe you are right about everything you believe? #1273750Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantOne of the Chevra: “Rabbi Avigdor Miller Z”L was once asked “What do you think of certain groups of people who believe that only their beliefs are correct and only the way of life they chose is correct, and everyone who disagrees or acts differently is wrong?”
Rabbi Miller answered ” That is the way it should be!” if you believe something is right or you chose a way of life, hopefully you think that your beliefs are correct and your way of life is the correct way, and anyone who believes otherwise is incorrect!””I agree with this! The idea that there is no such as absolute truth is a goyish, western one.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantuh…what? I just skimmed the article, but I didn’t see Chabad mentioned anywhere. Guessing this a joke..? But I don’t get it.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantWe don’t teach them that it is wrong to lie or to steal until it comes up. Or if it is in the Parsha or Chumash that they are learning. If cannibalism comes up and you don’t say anything about it, then you are right.
I actually did learn about it in halacha at some point.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantDY – non-religious people also have Neshamas and spiritual potential and do Mitzvos whether or not they know that’s what they are called. And a lot of them actually do know about and keep many Mitzvos.
You can’t really divide people up between religious and non-religious so easily. There can be “religious” people who aren’t really particularly religious (they just keep what they keep by rote, and aren’t really focused on Ruchnius growth), and there can be people who would be called non-religious, but really are very focused on Ruchnius growth according to their knowledge and ability.
A better question would be: Can an atheist truly have self-esteem? Or someone who is not an atheist but has no spiritual aspirations?
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantIn short: self-esteem comes from focusing on and defining yourself according to your (spiritual) potential and not your accomplishments. Your accomplishments are by definition limited so you will alway feel short and always feel bad about yourself if that is how you define yourself.
Your spiritual potential is unlimited so you will feel good about yourself if that is how you define yourself. If we would only realize how much we accomplish with every word, thought, or action! According to the Nefesh HaChaim, there are many “worlds” besides this one, and with every thought, word, or action, we make tremendous changes in all of these worlds. If you ever said one nice word to someone (even “hello”), you have done something so amazing that you can’t even imagine!!!!!
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantI don’t think that self esteem comes from accomplishments per se’. I think you are right that any kind of person can have low self esteem.
Self- esteem is something that mainly comes from inside – from knowing that you are Hashem’s child, that He loves you, and that you have G-d- given potential to do amazing things. And this is true no matter what traits and abilities you have. We all have the same potential in terms of Ruchnius, and it’s the Ruchnius accomplishments that should give us true self-esteem.
The problem with non-Ruchnius accomplishments is that the more one achieves, the more he feels he needs to achieve, so he is never satisfied with himself. Also non-Ruchnius accomplishments have no intrinsic value and don’t reflect on the person doing them so they can’t bring true happiness and self-esteem unless they are connected to Ruchnius accomplishments and viewed as a tool for Ruchnius accomplishments.
The best way to gain self-esteem is through working on bitachon. Reading Shaar Habitachon in Chovos Halevavos can be very helpful.
The other two important things are: 1. making sure you have a good support system and hanging out with positive people who like you and think well of you. 2. Taking care of yourself.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantWell, based on my experience….
Let’s just say that I try to daven every day not to have go to gehinnom. Preferably through Hashem helping me to do Teshuva and putting it in others’ minds to be moichel me.
This is probably one of the main tefillos that I try to constantly daven. I think it’s kidai for everyone (except for those who will become OCD).
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipant“Insistence that you, a woman, have the ability, and the authority to pasken a shaila for someone you don’t know and are not able to have a basic conversation with is frightening. People need to know that that is not how halacha works.
Once again, An appropriate response would have been that you are of the opinion that…but that she needs to check with her rabbi or a posek.”
I hope you realize that every time you make a decision regarding whether or not to post something you are poskening. I wonder why you think that you are qualified to do so? Have you asked a sheilah regarding whether or not you are allowed to do so?
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantI realized after I wrote the long post that I could have responded more simply as follows:
I don’t understand how you can possibly question what I wrote since you yourself have responded in similar ways with less reason for it. How about the fact that you wrote (or implied) that you didn’t think that LB should be askinig about bubble umbrellas? How can you posken that it’s definitely fine? Why didn’t you tell her that she must ask a sheilah? In that case, the issue was about something that is not mentioned one way or another in halacha, so how can you assume that it is mutter?
In this case, LB had not spoken loshon hora according to what she wrote. Why should she be made to feel that she has to ask a sheilah about every word she has ever said if there was no reason to think there was a problem?
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipant29 & Chumras – I also should point out that you are misquoting me when you say that I wrote that I can posken. What I actually wrote was that I can “posken”.
I thought I made it clear that I was using the term posken as you used it although it may or may not be the accurate definition of the term. I realize now that that may not have been entirely clear. I think I had originally intended to include some lines in my post about that I did not end up including. I still think it should be clear if you read my post carefully. But in case it is not, I hope it is now.
Again if it’s not, maybe you can find a Rav or someone who can explain it to you.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantPrecisely! Shkoyach!
I asked a sheilah once to a well-known poseik about taking something to help me sleep at night on Shabbos (I had recently heard a recording of a shiur in which it was mentioned that it’s a machlokes.) The Rav said that it’s assur. So I asked, “but isn’t there an opinion that it’s muttar?”
So he said, “Wait a minute.” He went and looked it up and came back and told me that I can take it if I really need to (I do).
Disclaimer: I am not suggesting that one make a practice of shopping for leniencies. I am talking about those situations in which there is more than one valid opinion, and there are factors that may make if difficult for the person in question to go by the stricter opinion. They should make sure to mention those factors when asking the sheilah.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantActually, the way I had read it before all the peirushim were posted was that BMYer and Mod 29 wrote something that could have sounded like they meant that no soap is allowed on Shabbos. I realize that they did not say that, but one could have understood them that way, as LB apparently did based on her question.
One certainly could have understood that there are those who hold that all soap is assur (which I thought was the case, since I know people who don’t use any soap on Shabbos, although perhaps, they just don’t feel like watering it down.) In any case, BMyer’s post could have been understood in either of these ways. LB apparently understood it that way, so she asked “how can one wash his hands on Shabbos if all soap is assur (or if one holds that all soap is assur)?”
So Joseph answered that if someone holds that all soap is assur, he uses water. I have known many people who did just that, so I saw no reason to assume that Joseph meant anything else.
Joe, how did I do? And who did better – me or WTP?
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantI’m so happy to hear that! I was scared that you guys weren’t friends anymore.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantMod 29 and lesschumras – you clearly have not read my post carefully, and are taken things out of context. Please read it again. I am not sure if you are deliberately pretending not to understand what I wrote or if you really are having a hard time. In either case, I don’t think there is anything more I can do. I apologize but I really spent a lot of time and effort in order to try to explain it to you. Maybe you can find someone else to explain it to you.
I did realize after I wrote it that there is a way I could have explained in shorter form that may be easier for you to understand. I will, bli neder, try to do so in a separate post.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantI believe I already responded to everything you wrote, but I will clarify some points that may not be clear.
You are wrong – this is the type of “psak” that everyone has to make all the time.
First of all, in general, anyone who knows the halacha can and should tell others what the halacha is if asked or if there is a situation that necessitates it. I teach halacha and write halacha sefarim and I answer people’s halacha questions (if I know the answer. Granted, there aren’t that many topics or that many questions I am qualified to answer, and I don’t pretend that there are. But I know when I am qualified to do so and when I am not and when it would be better to answer my question myself and when it would be better to refer the person elsewhere).
Second of all, even the most unlearned people have to “posken” on some level all the time. We posken every second of our lives. Every decision we make every second is a halachic decision and we have to posken for ourselves much of the time. We have to know when we can posken for ourselves and when we have to ask someone else.
We also have to posken for others all the time. I think you mentioned once that you have kids. I sincerely hope that you issue these types of “psakim” for your kids on a regular basis. If not, you should start going to chinuch classes or speak to a Rav about it.
Additinally, it is important to keep in mind that while halacha covers every aspect of our lives and each decision we make, there are many different types of halachos that call for different types of “knowledge” and “aitza”. Anyone who is in a position of giving advice or guiding others (which is everyone, but especially parents, teachers, therapists, and anyone who is in a similar position whether formally or informally) is poskening for the person when they give advice. As I wrote, every decision a person makes has to be made based on halacha, so every piece of advice you give someone has to based on halacha, since halacha covers every single thing that a person says, thinks, or does.
Some “piskei halacha” must be based more on those things that people think of as halacha and some times they are based more on factors such as psychology (Torah psychology not Freudian psychology). Although as I said everything is included under the umbrella of halacha on some level.
My response to LB was based on a combination of my knowledge of hilchos LH and my knowledge of Torah psychology (as learned from the Torah, my rebbeim, life experience and hilchos LH themselves). “Poskening” hilchos L”H usually involves a certain knowledge of (Torah) psychology.
I did not tell her to ask a sheilah for a combination of several reasons. I would have preferred not to go into them, but I suppose it is necessary in order to clear up any misconceptions. First of all , I felt very strongly that I knew the answer. Additionally, I did not know who she would ask and I do not have reason to believe that she would ask someone who knows better than me. The fact that someone holds the title Rabbi does not necessarily mean that he would know the answer to this question better than me. As one of my friend’s husband says “you only ask a question if you don’t know the answer.”
Regarding hotlines, I (and others I know) have had experiences in which we were given the wrong answer. In some cases, this was because the Rav answering the question knew less about the particular halachos than I did (and admitted that fact when I referred him to the appropriate source), and in some cases it was because he did not understand the situation despite my attempts to clarify (and yes, in the cases I am referring to, we asked another Rav who confirmed that the first Rav was wrong).
Some of the problems with hotlines are: 1. The Rabbanim are not always super-knowledgeable or super-capable of issuing piskei halacha. 2. It is often very difficult or impossible to give over all the pertinent details. This is particularly true when dealing with a question that involves more psychological insight and less technical knowledge of the Shulchan Aruch per se’. In some cases, it actually can be easier to give over the needed information in writing (like here) to a “friend”.
I would like to qualify the above by saying that I have had some wonderful experiences with hotlines (usually with Shmiras Haloshon ones), but I have also had some very bad ones. I had no way of knowing whom LB would turn to or what her experience would be like. Since I did feel that I knew the answer, it was better for me to give it to her than to tell her to go elsewhere without having any way to know that.
The most important reason why I wrote what I wrote is something else though. Based on my knowledge of psychology (attained through a lot of life experience as well as Torah and knowledge of hilchos LH), I felt that it was crucial for LB to know that there is no question that she did the right thing and she should know that she should not hesitate to do so again.
I had a Rav once who quoted a certain Gadol as saying that sometimes people are too careful about hilchos LH and do not speak when they should. This was a case in which LB was supposed to speak based what she wrote. The possible damage when not speaking can be greater in some cases. The possible damage in thinking that she can never speak without calling a Rav first is also greater.
We can not and should not feel like we have to ask a sheilah each time we open our mouths or take a step. We can not and should not feel like we have to ask a sheilah to verify if we have to do teshuva for each word we spoke or each step we took. This is something that I know and have learned from my Rebbeim (and it should be self-evident in any case). When a person is emotionally upset about something, he has an obligation to discuss it with someone if it will make him feel better or if the person can help him understand the person being spoken about better. When a person does so, it is not healthy for him to second-guess himself each time and be concerned that he was oiver on hilchos L”H.
From what I know about LB, it would not have been psychologically unhealthy for her to feel that she has to ask a sheilah each time she speaks to find out if she needs to teshuva. My words to her were based more on psychology than technical halacha. Perhaps some people would have started out the discussion by saying that it wasn’t a halachic “psak” but a psychological “psak”. I was hesitant to do so since everything is included in halacha and there is no such thing as a decision that is not based on halacha. Also, the psychological aspect involved is in fact covered by the halachos, and I felt it was important for LB to be aware of this.
-
AuthorPosts