Lilmod Ulelamaid

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 6,851 through 6,900 (of 7,986 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Ladies First – Is it respectful or not? #1178384
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    “I had an arranged marriage, lilmod. (I also happen to think they’re the best approach to shidduchim.) There were no doors needing to be opened at the beshow. :-)”

    sigh…trying to get answers to simple questions around here…..

    in reply to: Midvar sheker tirchak- never tell a lie #1176581
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    APY: “The number one rule in writing a news article or story is midvar sheker tirchak, not a catchy come on. If you can accomplish both, great.”

    Like!

    in reply to: Ladies First – Is it respectful or not? #1178381
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    “when I was in shidduchim about 25 years ago, the accepted practice (and I dont know how both sides knew this, but everyone just did) was that the guy held open the door, gal walked through and moved to the side and guy came in and they continued walking together.”

    Shkoyach! That’s what I’ve been suggesting!

    in reply to: Ladies First – Is it respectful or not? #1178380
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Joe – seriously, what did/do you do? Or am I getting too personal now?

    in reply to: Twenty Questions – new round #1186551
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Don’t think about tzniyus, but once you come up with a guess (w/o having thought about tzniyus beforehand), try to think if it can connect to tzniyus.

    Was that too confusing? I confuse myself sometimes. I often wonder how people are able to follow me (not literally – don’t worry, Joseph) – maybe that’s why so many don’t, and why I get such interesting responses to my posts sometimes.

    in reply to: Twenty Questions – new round #1186550
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    lol

    in reply to: Why do working people tend to not be as ruchniyus as Kollel people? #1177031
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    “You can still see it in Eretz Yisrael today.

    True, although easier when everyone else around you also has nothing.”

    True, but still not simple. And there are always those who have less than others. And often, people take turns being the one who has less than others, so many people get to be in that situation.

    But, if you are going to be poor, it is definitely MUCH more geshmak to be poor in Eretz Yisrael where there is so much more ruchnius, so you don’t need the gashmius as much!!! And where there is so much more hashagacha pratis (see the Ramban – sorry I don’t have the source,and I’m too busy making potato kugel to look it up :))

    in reply to: Ladies First – Is it respectful or not? #1178378
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    GAW -thanks for trying! 🙂

    in reply to: Reminder! Do not leave kids locked in cars #1177238
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Mammele: “Hevei dan es kol haadam l’kaf zchus” I am sure the mother is suffering enough; let’s not add to her suffering by maligning her.

    Likelihood is that she did forget the baby, and remembered when she left the store, and that’s why she asked where the baby was.

    in reply to: Why do working people tend to not be as ruchniyus as Kollel people? #1177026
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Meno: “Having the tendency to bring up the subject of money is not an indication that a person is more obsessed with gashmiyus than one who does not have this tendency.

    If you have a lot of money, you don’t have to discuss the cost of things because it doesn’t affect your ability to afford it. That doesn’t mean you aren’t obsessed with gashmiyus.”

    Meno, thanks. Precisely my thoughts, although I’m not sure if I could have phrased it as well. Thanks for saving me the effort.

    in reply to: Why do working people tend to not be as ruchniyus as Kollel people? #1177025
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    “LU – Stop dreaming! I’ve been in Lakewood for many, many years.”

    So have I! And almost everyone I know, if not everyone is EXTREMELY mistapek b’muat and sacrifices a TON for Torah AND Chesed!!!! You may know different people than I do, and I feel really badly for you, because there are so many wonderful people in Lakewood whom you can meet. If you do know other people, please take note of the crucial note in my last post before commenting further!!! Please!!! Moshiach IS coming this year, if we only let him!!!!!

    in reply to: Twenty Questions – new round #1186547
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Let’s try some GENERAL questions – questions, not guesses.

    in reply to: Twenty Questions – new round #1186546
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Meno – how does a Shabbos afternoon nap connect to tznius?

    in reply to: Ladies First – Is it respectful or not? #1178373
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Person1- thanks for clarifying. I hope I didn’t offend you.

    Joe – just curious, what do/did you do on dates?

    in reply to: hair #1176927
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Sparkly:

    ” Meno – im NOT married but when i do get married its up to my husband if i cover my hair or not. so for example right now i have 2 shidduchim with 2 wonderful guys b’h so 1 wants me to cover my hair the other doesnt so if either shidduch works out its up to them NOT me.”

    Sparkly, according to halacha, it is up to you, not your husband. You have the bechira to choose your husband, and the responsibility to choose a husband who will not pressure you to stop keeping halacha. If you do end up marrying such a person, it is still in your hands to keep halacha.

    I have a friend whose cousin covers her hair even though her husband tells her every day how ugly she looks (can’t even imagine how much schar she will get for covering her hair under those circumstances!), but I wouldn’t advise marrying someone like that l’chatchila (at the time she got married, she thought that covering your hair was a chumra so she didn’t start covering her hair until many years later when she found out it was an actual halacha).

    in reply to: phone #1176599
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Meno – because they are away from home. Same could be said about Yeshiva, but there are some who would say Yeshiva Bochurim shouldn’t have phones, and there may be Yeshivas that assur it. Also, a Yeshiva Bochur learns 24/7, so he doesn’t need a phone, unless he is in shidduchim.

    in reply to: Twenty Questions – new round #1186544
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    1. not a turtle.

    ( hard to say if it’s bigger than a turtle, but sort of – not counted as a question, cuz it doesn’t have a real answer.)

    2. not a person.

    3. does it have something to do with judasim? yes. lol. Have I ever yet chosen something that doesn’t? Great question!!!!

    4. does it have something to do with tznius? Interesting question. It is often very strongly connected to tznius,and people probably should connect it to tznius more often than they do. However, it is not the usual association, so thinking about tznius may confuse you.

    5. Is it chulent? not even close (although knowing you, I’m sure you will find some humorous way to connect the two when you find out what it is).

    in reply to: Ladies First – Is it respectful or not? #1178369
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Person1 : “Like I said it doesn’t feel non tznius to me. Rs”z in his discussed tshuva give a good svore to why it is, or used to be, non tznius.”

    True, but you also said that about other halachos of tznius, even though they clearly are supposed to be a problem (I’m not saying this to criticize you – I’m not sure if it’s a maaleh or a chisaron or neither – but it seems to me that it makes your response less relevant). But I do appreciate your answering.

    in reply to: Ladies First – Is it respectful or not? #1178367
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Joseph, I think that your short, to-the-point post answers the entire issue much more than anything else that has been posted until now!

    Well, at least in terms of what girls should be doing.

    It still doesn’t NECESSARILY mean that on the guy’s side, it is okay for him to walk in front of the girl if she will not understand the reason for it and will be insulted and if in fact, Rav Shlomo Zalman Zatsal poskened otherwise. I still don’t see why he can’t avoid the problem by letting her go ahead and holding the door open for her without walking behind her.

    But at least, I know for myself now what my mehalech should be.

    Thank you!

    in reply to: Ladies First – Is it respectful or not? #1178366
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Golfer – I assume you are a girl?

    in reply to: Ladies First – Is it respectful or not? #1178365
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Joseph, thank you!!!!

    in reply to: Ladies First – Is it respectful or not? #1178364
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    GAW: “Let me ask the question this way: When a girl walks in front of a Frum boy, is she doing something similar to what the lady in your hypothetical case is doing if she KNOWS that there are men who will be deliberately watching her?

    No, she is doing something worse. By acting specifically in a manner that shows herself off IN PUBLIC, which even when the “ervas” are fully covered, she is Over Da’as Yehudis. If “she KNOWS that there are men who will be deliberately watching her” (AKA Histaklus) doing this act, because of that action, that would be “Vered” (IMHO).”

    Sorry, my question was not phrased well and got misunderstood. I meant that the lady in your situation knows that someone is watching her.

    It’s too complicated to reexplain the way I phrased it and what I meant. I rephrased it in my last post which was written before your last post “appeared” (which may not be your last post by the time this appears 🙂 ) My last post should have “appeared” by now, so see how I phrased the question there. It is much clearer I think.

    in reply to: Now what happened to Lilmod? #1214950
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Btw, I feel very honored to have a thread named for me! Thanks CA!

    in reply to: Twenty Questions – new round #1186541
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    1. not a turtle.

    ( hard to say if it’s bigger than a turtle, but sort of – not counted as a question, cuz it doesn’t have a real answer.)

    2. not a person.

    3. does it have something to do with judasim? yes. lol. Have I ever yet chosen something that doesn’t? Great question!!!!

    in reply to: The Best Way to Search the Coffee Room for Topics and Posts #1176521
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Thanks. I’d been having a really hard time figuring that out.

    in reply to: Mochel Loch… time to forgive and be forgiven! #1184953
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    “Lilmod,

    The mods should answer that question they’re the ones that make subtitles”

    Thanks CA. I didn’t know that. I think there may be a rule about the same person not having more then one “name”, so if it’s from the Mods, I’m guessing it’s a joke?

    No

    in reply to: Ladies First – Is it respectful or not? #1178359
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Maybe this is a better way to phrase it: Would the average Frum boy be “over” (transgress) on histaklus (or at least find it difficult not to be) if a Frum tzniusly dressed girl were to walk in front of him?

    Is so, this is something important for Frum girls to know, and therefore, I would like to know. Thank you. And thank you GAW, for your categorization which helped me to figure out how to phrase the question. Thank you all in advance for answering.

    in reply to: Why do working people tend to not be as ruchniyus as Kollel people? #1177016
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    “And for those who have the delusion that the “kollel” lifestyle is founded on being “mistapeik be’mu’ot”, look around, and you will see this is not true.

    It may not be true now, but if you would have seen Lakewood even 30 years ago you would have seen Jews who sacrificed and were “mistapeik be’mu’ot” for learning Torah.”

    You can still see it in Eretz Yisrael today. You can also still see it in Lakewood – most people I know in Lakewood fall in that category, and make great sacrifices for Limud Torah (and let’s not start talking about the ones who don’t – there are MANY that do, and we don’t need to find negative things to say on Yom Kippur Katan of the final Rosh Chodesh Elul before Moshiach comes – by next year, we will all have the opportunity to sit and learn without being mistapek bemuat, B’ezras Hashem, as long as we avoid bashing each other and spreading motzi shem ra about Am Yisrael.)

    in reply to: Ladies First – Is it respectful or not? #1178356
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Person1 – thank you for answering the question! An answer at last! I’m sorry – I started my post before I saw yours.

    I deliberately phrased it that way because I wanted to make it clear that the issue is based on respect for women. This is true in both directions: On the one hand, if the guy is supposed to let the girl go first, it is out of respect of her. On the other hand, if he is NOT supposed to let her go first, it is certainly out of respect for her, since if it is untznius, it is not respectful to her! That is the what tznius is about – respect for women!!! Unfortunately, that is something that people don’t always realize.

    So my question was, even if it true that it is completely muttar nowadays, would it still pose a tznius issue on the guy’s part and hence be something that the girl might want to try to avoid?

    Thank you for answering the question Person1, but if you feel that way about most halachos of tznius (which I don’t think is typical – there is a reason for the halachos, although this may have to do with the community you live in and what you are used to), then I’m not sure your answer is so helpful l’maaseh.

    in reply to: Ladies First – Is it respectful or not? #1178354
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    “Does that answer the question?”

    No it doesn’t actually. No one here answered my question. No one seems to have understood it (besides Meno, but he chose not to answer it either). I was deliberately trying to phrase it tzniusly, and therefore not too directly, but no one understands what I’m asking. :(.

    “Depends on the scenario. Let’s say a woman is sunbathing in her own backyard, where there is no Chiyuv to be covered, but men can see (for whatever reason). The men have a chiyuv not to look (Etzba Ketana and Histaklus), but the woman has no chiyuv to cover up (as she is in her own chatzer).”

    I have no idea whether or not that is accurate halachically, but it is not relevant to what I am trying to ask. Regardless of whether or not it is muttar, no lady with any sense of tznius/self-respect will deliberately put herself in such a situation if it is avoidable (without getting into the specific scenarios that you may be referring to – let’s just assume that it is easy to avoid such a situation and there is no reason not to).

    Let me ask the question this way: When a girl walks in front of a Frum boy, is she doing something similar to what the lady in your hypothetical case is doing if she KNOWS that there are men who will be deliberately watching her?

    in reply to: hair #1176922
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Meno:”side question: Sima Batsheva, if they shave off all their hair, why do they still cover their heads?”

    Meno, if you hair was shaved, wouldn’t you want to cover it (especially if you were a lady)? Besides, from a halachic perspective, the hair is constantly growing in, and you wouldn’t be able to shave it the second a hair pops up.

    in reply to: Why do working people tend to not be as ruchniyus as Kollel people? #1177011
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Health: “What I proved was that a working guy can be on a high level”

    Maybe so, but that has nothing to do with the issue being discussed. By bringing that point on this thread, it sounds like you are using this as a proof that the OP is wrong. If you want to start a discussion about how it’s possible for a working guy to be on a high level, that should be started as a new topic in a new thread, since it has no connection to this one (and by bringing it here, you are diverting the issue – a common problem in the CR in general).

    problem – occurrence, it’s all how you look at it

    in reply to: Twenty Questions – new round #1186539
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Meno- thanks for taking the time to do that. Very good idea, since important topics can easily “get lost” the old way.

    Yours truly,

    Lilmod.

    in reply to: Now what happened to Lilmod? #1214949
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    btw, I discovered that if you are trying to search for a previous post, you might have better success using Google than using the search button in the CR.

    in reply to: Mochel Loch… time to forgive and be forgiven! #1184951
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Sparkly: “coffee addict – whos joe?”

    Joseph.

    in reply to: Mochel Loch… time to forgive and be forgiven! #1184950
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Sparkly – If there is anything you need to ask me mechila for, I am moichel.

    CA: “Joseph, look at all the subtitles of previous posters”

    Joseph, what’s the pshat? Are they really all you?

    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    I glanced at the responses to my post. One glance was enough. Please, if you care at all about Am Yisrael, reread this paragraph and stop doing things that lead to more chayalim and other yidden being killed:

    “Again, I beg of all of you, do not turn this into a Sinas Chinam thread. Most of you are neither learning full-time or serving in the army. You are not helping Am Yisrael in either of these ways. If you want to help Am Yisrael, if you want to make sure that one less chayal is killed, that one more mother does not have to sit shiva for her teen-age son, you can do your part by refraining from Loshon Hara and Sinas Chinam. In that way, you can accomplish much, much more than all of the chayalim in the Israeli Army put together.”

    in reply to: Dating question #1176519
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    I have a question on this whole “ladies first” thing.

    Some of the comments here as well as something else I saw on the topic got me thinking about this. I still am pretty convinced that as per Rav Shlomo Zalman, there are heterim nowadays, although w/o seeing it inside, it is hard to know to what extent it is b’dieved.

    But, let’s assume for a moment that it’s technically completely muttar. Let’s assume that you never saw any specific source that it was assur. Something can be a problem in terms of tznius even if it is not brought down anywhere, simply because it is clearly a problem, and if one knows that is the case, obviously they should try to avoid it if possible.

    I got the impression from some of the postings here that this may possibly fall in that category. I would like to know from the male posters here: If you had never heard that there was any halachic issue involved, would you consider it a problem in terms of tznius? (I hope that’s not inappropriate, I am asking l’toeles, since I have no other way of knowing. You can answer with a simple “yes” or “no”).

    in reply to: Midvar sheker tirchak- never tell a lie #1176576
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Shkoyach Daas Yachid!

    in reply to: Now what happened to Lilmod? #1214945
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    MA – I don’t learn Daf Yomi, but I do learn from regular Sefarim in hebrew.

    Amen! Thank you!

    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    “Some of this is true, but what about the fact that people in the army are risking their lives? Many soldiers are killed/captured/wounded, that is a sacrifice people who avoid the army do not make.”

    That is true, and my post was not intended to belittle the sacrifices made by chayalim, and I am “makir tov” to them as well (even though I personally feel that they would be helping the country more by learning, and I think that the Yeshiva Bochurim are doing more for me, I realize that they don’t realize that/feel differently/can’t be learning/perhaps we do need some people in the army to protect the country physically, etc., and that they are putting their lives in danger to help Am Yisrael.

    However, the sacrifices made by those who choose to learn instead of going to the army often go unnoticed and people assume they are “taking the easy way out” when in fact, the sacrifices they are making may in fact be much greater.

    A few points to keep in mind when comparing the sacrifices made:

    1. Not all chayalim put their lives in danger. Only the ones in combat units do. I don’t know numbers, but MANY chayalim are not in combat units and are not putting their lives in danger.

    2. In Israel, most or much of the danger from the enemies affects everyone equally (bombs, scuds, terrorist attacks, etc.)

    3. If you grow up in Israeli non-Chareidi society, for the most part you don’t WANT to NOT go to the army. If you don’t go to the army, you are not a MAN. Boys who are not accepted into the army are not happy about it and TRY to get in (I have personally known boys like that who were VERY upset about not getting into the army or not getting into a combat unit).

    4. It is very difficult to compare one type of difficulty to another, and I know that this is going to cause a lot of back-and-forth arguments (sigh), but it does seem to me pretty clear actually that not having a parnassah is one of the greatest challenges that there is, and most people would willingly put their lives in danger to earn a parnassah if they had to. We see all the time that this is so – in the olden days, people worked in dangerous mines (I think – I don’t know history so well, so I may need help from fellow posters on this one, but I am sure that people have always been willing to put their lives in danger and do whatever it took to earn a parnassah).

    The Aruch HaShulchan in the halachos of bentching mentions that not having a parnassah is the greatest difficulty that one can have.

    5. One of the MK’s from a non-Chareidi party said that there are three services that Israelis perform for the country:

    a) army service, b) working c) Limud Torah.

    She said that of the three, Limud Torah is the hardest since unlike army service, it does not merely last for 3 years but rather for many,many years,maybe an entire life. Also, unlike most jobs which are only for 8 hours a day, learning is for the entire day. Learning involves the most intense on-going commitment of any of the 3 types of service.

    6. I have heard that it is REALLY difficult to learn all day. My impression is that it is much harder than going to the army. This may be hard for an American to understand (especially someone who is not learning all day). On the one hand, if you haven’t tried to do it, it is hard to understand how hard it is to learn all day. On the other hand, if you are not from Israel, going to the army sounds like the hardest thing in the world. I am not saying it is not hard, but if you grow up with it, it is not AS hard as it sounds. You do not have to be as self-motivated as you do when you learn.

    7. Living in Israel, not going to the army IS going against the tide. While it is true, as someone pointed out in another thread, that if you are part of Chareidi society, in a certain sense, deferring army service is not going against the tide, at the same time, in a certain sense it is (which is why I initially said so and why I still stand by that). Even if you are part of a Chareidi society, you are still part of the country as a whole. You are very aware of the fact that the country is at war, and you hear about chayalim being killed, and you are aware that they are fighting (physically) and you are not. You are very aware of what the rest of the country thinks of you for not fighting (physically). You have to go down to the draft deferment office on a regular basis and prove that you are learning so that you don’t have to go to the army. You can’t get a job because you didn’t go the army. You are despised and looked down at as a draft dodger by many, including many religious people. Posters in the Coffee Room of Yeshiva World write posts for the entire world to see saying that you are taking the easy way out because you don’t want to go to the army. You don’t receive the many benefits that the government gives those who go to the army. Instead of being supported by the government, you have to pay the government money every month from the time you turn 18 even though you are in Yeshiva and not earning any money. The government holds you prisoner and will not allow you to leave the country even for a visit without their permission (which they will only grant for specific reasons and for a specified period of time).

    Yet you are willing to make these sacrifices because you know it is for Am Yisrael’s own good.

    8. Keep in mind that even if you want to claim that as an individual in the Chareidi world, someone who defers the army is not going against the tide, the Chareidi world itself didn’t come out of nowhere. The Chareidi world had to fight against the tide and is continually fighting for its very existence. The Chareidi world started out as a tiny, powerless entity, and is continually fighting for its very existence against the Secular Zionist Government who is in control and much more powerful and is continually trying to destroy it. They have only managed to succeed in maintaining their community through their constant vigilance and vigor in defending their right to exist and not be swallowed up by the Secular Zionist society that is trying to pressure them to assimilate. If an individual in Chareidi society feels that it is easy (which I can’t imagine to be the case) to learn and defer army service, it is only because the Chareidi society has been fighting very hard against the tide to create a society like that – a society in which it is possible for a boy to grow up and learn Torah and not assimilate into the secular majority.

    Please Note: there is something a bit troublesome about arguing about who is sacrificing more than who. We all have to try to look at each other positively and appreciate what each one is doing for Am Yisrael and not be trying to prove who is better. I would really appreciate it if people would make sure that this thread does not turn into a sinas chinam/motzi shem ra thread. I am not trying to belittle the sacrifices that ANYONE makes for Am Yisrael or find the worst in anyone. My sole purpose was to defend those people who are defending the country by learning Torah against those who spoke negatively about them. Everyone is aware of the sacrifices made by chayalim; the sacrifices and contributions made by Bnei Torah are harder for many to see, so it is important to emphasize them. I personally feel (as do Gedolei Yisrael) that if one wants to give to Am Yisrael, he can give the most by learning Torah, and that we have to show the utmost respect and hakaras hatov to those who learn. On the one hand, through learning, one can do the most for Am Yisrael, so those who learn are doing the most for us. On the other hand, it IS harder for most people to see it, so it has to be emphasized. At the same time, I respect those people who feel they are contributing by serving in the army and/or working and I have hakaras hatov to them as well.

    Regardless of who you feel is sacrificing the most and whether or not you agree with my points, that is not the most important issue anyhow. Those who decide to learn don’t make the decision to do so because they think it involves more sacrifices. They do so because they feel they are helping Am Yisrael the most this way, regardless of whether it involves more sacrifices or less sacrifices. It leads to less sacrifices; that is why they do it, and that is what counts.

    Again, I beg of all of you, do not turn this into a Sinas Chinam thread. Most of you are neither learning full-time or serving in the army. You are not helping Am Yisrael in either of these ways. If you want to help Am Yisrael, if you want to make sure that one less chayal is killed, that one more mother does not have to sit shiva for her teen-age son, you can do your part by refraining from Loshon Hara and Sinas Chinam. In that way, you can accomplish much, much more than all of the chayalim in the Israeli Army put together.

    Kesiva V’chasima Tova!

    in reply to: Now what happened to Lilmod? #1214943
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    MA – I am a girl – I don’t learn daf yomi. I still should be learning more though than I have been.

    in reply to: hair #1176914
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Sparkly, your skirt has to be long enough that your knees will not show AT ALL in any position, whether you are sitting or walking or getting into a car. As I pointed out earlier, this means that that it HAS to be at least 4 inches below your knee, and most of the time a lot more. For a straight skirt, it has to be a lot more than that in order to ensure that your knees are covered AT ALL TIMES.

    I think that some girls may be nechshol BECAUSE of the 4- inch rule. Instead of checking if their knees are covered at all times, they assume that as long as their skirts are 4 inches, they are okay, and that is not necessarily the case.

    One pitfall that I have noticed is that sometimes girls/women will buy skirts that cover their knees as long as they don’t cross their legs, and they think that they will never cross their legs so it will be okay, but then without thinking, they forget and cross their legs.

    Another pitfall is that some skirts are fine until you get in a car and start driving.

    Another pitfall is that getting into cars makes your skirt go up, so you have to make sure that your skirt is long enough that your knees do not show when you get into a car. (personally, I never let my friend’s husband give me a ride unless I am wearing a REALLY long skirt, because when he drives me, I have to sit in the back seat, and the back seat of their minivan has a very high step).

    Another pitfall, IMHO, (and I know that there are people who will disagree with this) is that nowadays it has become fairly widely accepted that most people wear stockings/tights as opposed to knee-his. I personally feel that people are sometimes less careful about letting their knees show because they think that it’s not such a big deal because they are wearing stockings. I wonder if they would be more careful if they were wearing knee his. The counter-argument that some might have is that some might feel that it has become minhag hamakom to wear stockings. In any case, stockings or not, you have to make sure that your knees are covered at all times. In Rav Bodner’s sefer on hilchos brachos, he writes that the difference between your knees showing with or w/o stockings is that if you are wearing stockings, a man does not have to turn around to make a bracha, he only has to close his eyes or look down (I hope that was quoted accurately – I don’t have the sefer on me – but I do know that it was a very small difference, and either way it is still a BIG problem).

    Another pet peeve of mine: people who think it is untznius to wear long skirts, and meanwhile, they and many others wear skirts that are not long enough to make sure their knees are covered at all times. WEAR LONG SKIRTS, AS LONG AS YOU WANT – it is for sure one thousand times better than your knees showing, IMHO! (okay, MAYBE, they shouldn’t go all the way to the floor – I don’t know- but even that is better than your knees showing).

    End of rant.

    in reply to: Now what happened to Lilmod? #1214941
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    lol. I don’t think I was able to either when I tried.

    Are you spying on me or something?

    in reply to: Kollel – Talmud Torah Kneged Kulam #1177629
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Yeshivishe kup – first of all, I’m a girl, so I actually don’t know what you’re talking about. Second of all, I don’t think that means that it doesn’t count as learning Torah. The one thing I know about the topic is that Torah Shebichtav counts as learning whether or not you understand it, but for Torah Sheb’al peh, you have to understand it. But I can’t imagine that the mehalech you’re using matters. According to that logic, it would be bitul Torah to learn the way most people learn.

    in reply to: Twenty Questions – new round #1186536
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    By the way, Sparkly, I asked you mechila in the mechila thread. I don’t know if you saw it. It’s called, Mochel lach

    in reply to: hair #1176911
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Charlie Hall “”our gedolim of today made it HALCHA!”

    That is not true. They can establish new minhagim that might be binding for their own communities but no single rabbi has the power to actually change halachah in our times.”

    Very true, and that is the point I was trying to make. Thank you Charlie! It is crucial to know the difference between halacha and minhag. I was very concerned, HGG, about the fact that you think this is halacha yet you stated that you don’t keep it. If it really were halacha, not keeping it would NOT be an option.

    That statement illustrated to me the dangers of misrepresenting minhagim as halacha. When someone thinks that all of the minhagim or hiddurim are halachos, they feel that they can’t keep all of it, so they develop a lax attitude to halacha since they think it’s impossible to keep everything.

    If they would know which things are clear-cut black & white halachos, they would realize that even if they aren’t yet up to keeping all of the minhagim, it is not so hard to keep all the halachos (while gradually working on the minhagim/hidurim). They would realize what a serious thing it is to not keep an actual halacha and they would never think of saying the words, “it’s halacha, but I don’t keep it.”

    Tznius is more complicated as I pointed out, but there still are things that are black & white halachos handed down from Chazal and written in the Shulchan Aruch and things that are not.

    in reply to: hair #1176910
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Sparkly – I was actually completely serious! I’m sorry if it sounded sarcastic. And I really am curious to know if he was insulted.

    in reply to: Twenty Questions – new round #1186535
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    Sparkly – I didn’t see your post about dates. I don’t have a calendar on me right now, and I’m too tired to look right now, bli neder I will try to look when I have a chance.

    What do your teachers ask you about the holidays? I am too tired right now to answer a question like that, but tell me what they ask, and when I am less tired and have time to think about it, I will respond, bli neder.

    in reply to: Twenty Questions – new round #1186534
    Lilmod Ulelamaid
    Participant

    1. not a turtle.

    2. hard to see if it’s bigger than a turtle, but sort of

    3. not a person.

Viewing 50 posts - 6,851 through 6,900 (of 7,986 total)