Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipant
Sparkly, I already gave you a very long answer to that question in another thread. In short, they have to be long enough that your knees NEVER show.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipant2. Does it have to do with Judaism?
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantYou’re back! I was worried about you!
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipant1. Is it tangible?
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantWhat in the world is this about? What is SUC? and why did you “bump” this 29?
September 8, 2016 12:07 am at 12:07 am in reply to: Ladies First – Is it respectful or not? #1178497Lilmod UlelamaidParticipant“I find arrogance to be offensive on anyone — man or woman. I certainly don’t find it to be an “ornament.”
My apologies. I clearly missed the word “not” in the original quote from Rabbi Miller.
The Wolf”
I wrote my post before this was posted.
September 8, 2016 12:06 am at 12:06 am in reply to: Ladies First – Is it respectful or not? #1178496Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantWolf: “Rav Avigdor Miller (Awake My Glory): There cannot be two kings. The marriage relationship is two-fold. 1) The wife is submissive. This is not only Jewish but natural. There can be no harmony when there are two commanders. Without this indispensable condition, the home is disordered.
I do not find this to be true.
“First of all, I find it strange that anyone would compare a marriage to a military formation. Of course, in the military there must be one person in charge. But a marriage is not a military brigade, nor is it a kingdom to be ruled. It’s a partnership – and like all partnerships, it has to be run according to the personalities and skills of the partners. If the partnership works with one dominant person and one submissive — then all the more power to them. But saying that it is impossible to work with two people who have equal say in the affairs of the marriage is downright wrong, as there are plenty of people today who have marriages where they work together — not as king and servant or master and servant.”
Wolf, I don’t think there is necessarily a contradiction between what you are saying and what Rav Avigdor Miller is saying. The problem with these quotes (and presumably the reason that the moderators didn’t want to post them) is that it is very easy to misunderstand and misapply them.
I highly doubt that Rav Avigdor Miller intended that people should view marriage as a military formation. I also don’t think that the Rambam meant that women should be treated as slaves.
The husband and wife ARE partners! BUT at the same time, they do have different roles and the husband’s role involves being the more dominant one in certain ways.
Everyone is different and everyone is affected by their society to some extent, and while me must try to apply the Torah guidelines to our lives and our marriages, we also have to be realistic about who we are, and go about things in a natural way that works for us.
September 7, 2016 11:56 pm at 11:56 pm in reply to: Ladies First – Is it respectful or not? #1178495Lilmod UlelamaidParticipant“”Arrogance is unbecoming a woman” – Megillah 14B. For a man it is not an ornament, but for a woman it is as if she wore a mustache.
I find arrogance to be offensive on anyone — man or woman. I certainly don’t find it to be an “ornament.” “
Wolf, he wrote that it is NOT an ornament for a man. He IS saying that it is bad for ANYONE to be arrogant (but that it is more problematic when women are arrogant).
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipant“I know the brother and sister in law of the “bamboo cradle baby”.
Were Jews…it’s not a secret…I think most people know who they are.”
That’s funny, his name just came up last Shabbos, when the person whose house I was at mentioned that he davens in their shul (might not be the same brother though – there are a few).
September 7, 2016 9:25 pm at 9:25 pm in reply to: Return policy difference based on where you live. #1178060Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantSome of the posters wrote that many Jews as opposed to non-Jews engage in these practices. That is motzi shem ra on Am Yisrael. It is particularly dangerous to write such a thing since it feeds into the already existing Antisemitic stereotypes. This is the Internet – the entire world can read what is written here! It is a terrible thing to malign Am Yisrael to the goyim! During the Holocaust, the Nazis took things from the Jewish newspapers and used them to spread Antisemitism, leading to more Jews being murdered. And that was even before Internet!
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantI am copying and pasting my post from another thread (how to stop my wife spending) here since I think it is very relevant to this topic:
I think Person1’s point may have been that once you are involved in an argument (chas v’shalom), the best way to resolve it might not be for the husband to start pointing out all of the halachos to his wife and holding them over her head.
Both of your points are valid and important to keep in mind. On the one hand, the Shulchan Aruch must guide all of our actions, but at the same time, when dealing with relationships, one must also keep in mind that the main issue is the relationship itself and the individuals involved, and not necessarily the “dinei mamanos” involved. Obviously, the Torah is our Guide in all respects and it Guides us in the Middos and sensitivity needed to deal with relationship issues as well.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantJoseph, I see no indication from the quote from Rav Avigdor Miller that the wife should be the one to open the door for her husband AS OPPOSED to the other. It sounds like they should both respect each other and open doors for each other (as one of the posters stated that he does. Wolf? GAW? I forgot who it was).
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantJoseph: “lilmod: “maybe she should open the door for him, but it has to come from her, and that will only happen if he is focused on his obligations to her and not his to her.”
Rambam: “????? ???? ???? ???? ????? ?? ????? ?? ???””
I fail to see the “stira” here. It sounds to me that the Rambam is saying the same thing that I am saying – that it has to come from her. ????? ???? ???? ???? – The Rambam says that she is supposed to be in awe of him, not that he is supposed to place the awe on her.
If he is the kind of person that he is supposed to be and fulfills his obligation to her, then she is much more likely to be in awe of him etc.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantJoseph: “Mod in bold, I disagree with you. Is it okay to disagree with a mod? 😉
I would submit that, in fact, you’re being short-sighted in finding it problematic to approve the earlier posts. Even if you failed to understand the point, it wasn’t necessary to censor the sources.
[Now buckling my seat-belt for impact.]
I did not fail to understand the point”
I think that I may agree with Joseph on this. Obviously, I can’t say for sure, since I didn’t see the censored posts, but I do find it hard to see why you would censor his posts if he was simply bringing sources.
You have stated that you don’t censor posts based on your own hashkafas; yet it SOUNDS like that may be what you did here.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantGAW – I was talking about the US. I was under the impression that the Gedolim or Rabbanim there consider it a Mitzvah to vote, but like I said, I’m not 100% sure.
I just remember that when I was in high school, we were recruited to make calls to encourage people to vote. I assume that there were Gedolim behind this. It is possible that it had to do with a particular issue that was happening, although that was not my impression, but this was years ago and I was a kid at the time, and I don’t really remember exactly what we were making calls for or why.
September 7, 2016 8:44 pm at 8:44 pm in reply to: Midda Kneged Midda — how to understand the response? #1177919Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantAu’ contraire, the idea of Middah k’neged middah is that Hashem is showing us that the punishment is a result of the aveirah itself. It’s not that He wants to hurt us because we were bad and “deserve” to be treated badly in return. As one of my rabbaim said, “Hashem doesn’t punish; He corrects.” The whole point of the punishment is to help us. When we do an aveirah, we are hurting our Neshamas. We don’t see it, but every aveirah affects our neshama.
Our whole purpose in this world is to meet challenges and grow from them so that our Neshamas can be on the level they need to be on to be able to go to Gan Eden and be close to Hashem. When someone does an aveirah, he stains his Neshama and his neshama is no longer as pure and it is not possible for his neshama to enter Olam Haba and have a relationship with Hashem.
Through “punishment”, the Neshama is cleansed and is now pure again and able to have a relationship with Hashem. So the punishment is Hashem’s way of helping us out when we mess up and don’t do teshuva. Everything Hashem does is out of love for us and is good.
Hashem brings the punishment in middah k’neged middah form in order to illustrate to us that the punishment and the sin are connected. It’s not that we were bad and t/f Hashem is giving us a potch. The point is that the sin had an actual effect even though we don’t see it, and the punishment is removing THAT effect that we caused so that we can be pure again.
I believe that the Maharal is the source for the above idea.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantGAW: thanks. good to know.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantI may be wrong, but my impression is that the Gedolim consider it important/a Mitzvah to vote. I think that part of the reason for this may be that if the candidates see that a lot of Frum Jews vote, they are more likely to take Frum people’s needs and Israel into consideration. This would apply even if there is no one to vote for.
I also have heard that someone (maybe Rav Avigdor Miller) said that one should vote out of hakaras hatov to the US.
There are probably others here who know more about this me and can bring more accurate quotes on the topic.
September 7, 2016 7:24 pm at 7:24 pm in reply to: I know they are a great organization, but… #1213663Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantIt’s not just NCSY- it’s a general problem in the kiruv/bt world. They get tons of support as they are becoming Frum and not enough later on. A huge percentage of kids-at-risk are the children of bt’s. A lot of baalei teshuva get divorced. Baalei teshuvah need a lot of support after they become Frum, as they navigate the shidduch process, and try to figure out to build Frum homes and raise ffb kids despite never having been brought up in a Frum home themselves and being somewhat clueless regarding the differences between ffb’s (their kids) and bt’s (themselves).
A big part of the problem (in terms of their chinuch apporach) lies in not knowing the difference between a chumra and halacha and a kula, being too strict about the wrong things or too lenient about others. The Frum world is EXTREMELY complicated and if you didn’t grow up in it, you need a lot of guidance regarding how to raise your kids.
There are a lot of things that FFB’s take for granted and don’t even think about that baalei teshuva do not realize or is not natural for them.
I do think that the oilam has become more aware of these issues in recent years. Some of the major baalei teshuva schools have started alumni programming and are making efforts to reach out to their alumni. But it is a big job and I am sure that there is more to be done.
In terms of the rest of us, it is important to be aware of these issues so that if you do know any baalei teshuva, no matter how long they have been Frum, it is kidai to make an extra effort to reach out to them and their children.
September 7, 2016 6:14 pm at 6:14 pm in reply to: I know they are a great organization, but… #1213657Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantor perhaps we should make more of an effort to continue hugging them…
September 7, 2016 5:25 pm at 5:25 pm in reply to: Return policy difference based on where you live. #1178058Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantPeople, this thread is becoming pure Motzi Shem Ra on Am Yisrael!!!
September 7, 2016 5:23 pm at 5:23 pm in reply to: I know they are a great organization, but… #1213652Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantI actually know a family that does havdala every week with instruments! Okay, I guess they are not typical. For starters, you have to have some talent in the family or it’s not doable.
To answer your question, you have a valid point to some extent, but I guess the point is that most people are not becoming Frum because they want to have Havdala with a guitar. If it’s that important to them, they can learn to play guitar and do this every week.
I assume the point is to get kids interested in Yiddishkeit enough that they will then spend Shabbosim at people’s houses. But I don’t know anything about NCSY, so this would be better answered by someone who does.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantWolf – I just went back and read some of the original posts. That may be what the person who first brought up the topic (lightbrite) meant, although it’s not completely clear to me if that was the only thing he meant.
I then jumped into the conversation, and I was merely talking about my own feelings.
So you were sort of right. These conversations do get confusing!
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantPerson1: “Joseph it’s clear to me that the rambam didn’t c”v mean to say that a wife should treat her husband like a master in her. -actions-. Do you think he was trying to fix men up with lifelong slaves? That makes me shudder!
What he meant was that this is the way that a wife should treat her husband in her heart! That she should respect and admire him to such extent that he’ll be a like a king in her eyes.
If a wife feel that way towards her husband in her heart, I’d imagine serving him drinks might be one way she’d express that feeling.
But if a wife is -required- to serve her husband drinks, and is not doing so as a result of her admiration of him, the only thing she’ll be thinking is “I’d like to spill this on his head”. And that’s the only thing you might achieve from asking woman to serve drinks and open doors.”
Person1, well-said!
I think that there is a reason why the husband’s obligations to his wife are brought first. If he shows her love and respect, she will WANT to treat him like a king, and they will have a beautiful marriage! Maybe you are right, Joseph, and that will include opening doors for him if that’s so important to him, but it has to come from her and not from him. If he focuses on the first halacha (his obligations to her), then she will want to fulfill her obligations to him.
If it’s really important to him that she open doors for him, maybe she should open the door for him, but it has to come from her, and that will only happen if he is focused on his obligations to her and not his to her. There is a reason why Rav Arush gave such a strict warning to men not to read the women’s book!!! (much stricter than the warning to women not to read the men’s book)
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantWolf, it sounds to me like you have a very Torahdik marriage! And I don’t think it’s a contradiction to the Rambam either.
Joseph, The problem with quoting this Rambam without any explanation (and w/o quoting the Halacha beforehand regarding the husband’s obligations to his wife) is that it’s the type of thing that can be very easily misunderstood and give a very wrong impression of the Torah view of marriage.
There are enough people out there who already misunderstand these things. If you are really anti-feminism, you should be careful how you quote and apply things like this, since it feeds feminism.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantGAW: Thank you for bringing the Rambam. I don’t know how to type in hebrew on this computer, so I had to rely on my on-the-spot translation.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantSparkly: “lilmod ulelamaid – im trying to grow and so i NEED to convince my future husband who has a college degree to go to kollel that way we can raise a kollel family together.”
Sparkly, that’s beautiful, I just think that “chas v’shalom that my husband should work” sounds a bit extreme for you. I also think that you should go back and reread Meno’s post that he posted a link to. And I stand by my advice that you should go to Eretz Yisroel to learn for a bit, establish a hashkafic path for yourself, and most importantly find people who can give you guidance and be role models for you.
It doesn’t necessarily have to be for a full year, and it doesn’t necessarily have to be in Eretz Yisrael (although I don’t know if there are any options elsewhere), but I really think you need some guidance!
Does this guy have a Rav? If so, is his Rav someone you can speak to?
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantGAW: 1. The Shulchan Aruch is not talking about hair. He talks about men putting on their socks under their covers (if the minhag hamakom is not to walk around w/o socks). The Shulchan Aruch brings it down as halacha. It is Rav Moshe Feinstein who considers it to be midas chassidus. The Shulchan Aruch doesn’t say that.
2. “Different people may categorize pritzus differently according to their levels of sensitivity, so exactly what falls under that category may be subjective, and some people’s sensitivities can sound extreme to others who may be on a different level of sensitivity.
You’ve just admitted that it isn’t Halacha, as Halacha doesn’t change based on “sensitivity”.”
You are making it sound as though I originally stated that it was a halacha, and now I am “admitting” that it is not.
On the one hand, I had not stated it was halacha. On the other hand, I never “admitted” that it’s not halacha. I merely stated that some of the exact definitions may not be clear-cut in halacha. That is like saying that being tznius is not halacha simply because some of the aspects of tznius are not clearly defined in halacha and rely on people using their own seichel/sensitivity. Or like saying that “V’ahavta l’raecha kamocha” is not a halacha for the same reason.
Tachlis, I asked my Rav for the halachic source, and I will bring it soon. I just want to verify something first.
3. I am kind of surprised that this concept is such a chiddush for you. You never heard of girls not watching movies?? Or at least being careful what movies they watch???
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantokay, I just looked up the Rambam, and the halacha BEFORE this one is: “And so the Chachamim commanded that a man should honor his wife more than himself and love her like himself, and if he has money, he should increase (what he gives her) according to his means, and he should not place upon her extra fear and his speech to her should be pleasant and he shouldn’t be sad or tempermental”
So maybe opening doors is the way he shows her honor and love.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantIn terms of the Rashi you brought, l’maaseh the halacha is that women do say “shelo asani aved”.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipant??? ??? ?? ???? ????? ????? ?? ???? ????? ???? ????? ???? ???? ???? ????? ?? ????? ?? ???. ????? ?????? ??? ?? ?? ??? ????? ????? ??? ?????? ?? ?? ?????. ??? ??? ???? ????? ???? ????? ??????? ???????? ???????. ??????? ??? ???? ????? ??? ??????:
How do you interpret treating him as a king and ruler?
My above posts were written before this was posted, so that were not davka said in response to this although they could have been.
1. Like I said, there are halachos about how a husband needs to treat his wife as well.
2. The Rambam explains what it means: ????? ????? ??? ?????? ?? ?? ?????
not opening doors.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantWhat was the tznius thread? I missed that.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantThere are also halachos about how a husband should treat his wife! When you bring sources like this w/o the other sources about how a husband should treat his wife, it presents a twisted perspective on Judaism to the outside world (even if that was not your intention).
I would translate eved as servant since slave has different connotations nowadays.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantJoseph, DY wrote in the other thread: “He also writes, ???? ??? ???? ????? ???? [?? ????? ????? ??
“?? ??????] ??? ??? ?????? ??????,
You never responded to that point. That is clear proof that Rav Shlomo Zalman Zatsal held that we do care about common courtesy.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantJoseph: “The goyim also have a custom of men shaking women’s hands when offered. And the goyish custom is for women to dress not tznius when making a party. We don’t follow their customs as a rule, even if it doesn’t violate a specific halacha. And when it does violate halacha, such as walking behind women, we surely don’t pick up gentile customs.”
I brought proofs that we do (when it doesn’t violate halacha). And what is your point in bringing in examples of cases where it does violate halacha?
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantJoseph: “the problem is that the man is always supposed to be in front since he is not allowed to walk behind his wife, so he ends up being the one to hold the door open for her.
Not if the door is pulled out to open. If he goes in first then she will be holding the door open for him.”
I don’t get what you mean. If he is in front of her, she can’t open the door for him. In any case, I always feel like it would be untznius for me to stand there holding open the door for a man, and I always feel like they are not comfortable with the idea either.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantJoseph: “None of your proofs to support the position of men specifically opening the door for women or for women to go before men are as strong as the proofs I brought above from Chazal, Rashi and Rambam (citing Chazal) l’halacha to support the opposite notion.”
Joseph, they support the notion that we do care about common custom. The sources you brought do not say that women should open the door for men, and to the best of my knowledge that has never been the Jewish custom.
The question is: “What is the Jewish custom and what do the Gedolim do?”
I have never noticed that it is a Jewish custom for women to davka open the door for men, although, I am not sure that the opposite is so wide spread either. But it is certainly much more common for men to open the door for women.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantJoseph: “or pour their drinks for that matter?
In most families I know the wife serves the food and drinks as well as makes the beds.”
Serving drinks is not the same as pouring drinks. I have never seen a wife pour her husband’s drinks for him.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantSparkly, It’s great that you want to grow, but I am more than a little concerned about this sudden and complete turnaround. To go from wanting a guy who is working to saying “chas v’shalom that my husband should work” seems rather a big change to make such a short time.
Did something happen over the last day or two to cause this change?
edited
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantJoseph, I already proved that Jews take goyish customs into account, and you never responded to that post.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantThe truth is that in a non-dating situation, either one can hold the door open for the other, but the problem is that the man is always supposed to be in front since he is not allowed to walk behind his wife, so he ends up being the one to hold the door open for her.
Personally, whenever I am going through a door and see a man behind me, I always want to hold open the door for them (rather than close it on them), but I am always concerned that they won’t think it’s tznius and would rather I didn’t.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantor pour their drinks for that matter? I think the reason why we don’t have to do those things today is because they are not common custom.
So the source that you are bringing is actually a proof that we DO take common custom into account.
September 7, 2016 2:56 am at 2:56 am in reply to: Return policy difference based on where you live. #1178047Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantThere was probably some reason why she can’t offer the full refund to people in certain places but felt that she either could or had to in others. It’s totally legitimate, as long as everyone knows about it and she’s not hiding it.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantJoseph – we weren’t talking about husbands and wives (not that I agree that wives should open doors for husbands, but I’m just pointing out that we weren’t even talking about that).
Anyhow, I did bring you a proof – I pointed out that common custom is important in halacha.
Regarding the Rambam, he lists obligations of a wife to a husband but doesn’t mention opening the door for her. And he also talks about the husband’s obligations to his wife, so you can say that she should open the door for him.
And how many wives do you knwo who wash their husband’s hands?
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantI never thought or implied there were – I was just talking about emotional issues – the whole concept of an engagement ring is emotional not about mazel or spirituality (except in as much all our actions are connected to spirituality).
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantIn that case, you really do need to go to EY in order to stabilize your growth.
September 7, 2016 2:21 am at 2:21 am in reply to: Return policy difference based on where you live. #1178045Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantI’m sure there’s some kind of practical reason for it.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantSparkly – what? I thought you were fine with a guy who is either in Kollel OR working? Now you’re saying he definitely can’t work? Nothing wrong with either opinion, but which one is yours? Do you only want a guy who is learning or is either way fine with you?
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipant“Also, dark chocolate is health food.”
That’s why it doesn’t help.
Lilmod UlelamaidParticipantWolf – huh? Who ever said anything about a religious issue here?
-
AuthorPosts