Kuvult

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 355 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Presidential power #2379598
    Kuvult
    Participant

    Akuperma,
    You forgot May 1861 when Lincoln declared Baltimore to be under Martial Law.
    Chief Supreme Court Justice Roger Taney ruled only Congress can declare Martial Law & Lincoln’s order is null & void.
    Lincoln ignored Taney’s ruling & used his army to occupy Baltimore & enforce Martial Law.

    in reply to: Any good Jewish jokes L’Kavod Purim? #2379391
    Kuvult
    Participant

    3 Jews die at the same time & go to heaven together.
    The Angel says to the 1st man, “You were a Modern Orthodox Doctor & made a big Kiddush Hashem. Go to Room 18 but be very quiet when you pass Room 8.”
    Next the Angel says to the 2nd man, “You spent your life in Kollel immersed in Torah. Go to Room 21 but be very quiet when you pass Room 8.”
    The Angel says to the 3rd man, “You were a Rosh Yeshiva & taught so much Torah. Go to Room 14 but be very quiet when you pass Room 8.”
    The Rosh Yeshiva says, “I understand having different rooms for different types of Jews but why do we all have to be quiet when we pass Room 8?”
    The Angel says, “Because the Chasidim are in Room 8 & they think they are the only ones here.”

    in reply to: Rabbi J.B. Soloveitchik — A Godol B’Kiruv #2374530
    Kuvult
    Participant

    A little history lesson.
    Due to the Jewish & Non-Jewish enlightenment, the Emancipation of the Jews, Revolutions, Urbanization, a greater reliance on science, etc. there was a crisis in Traditionalist Judaism. Several responses occurred. 1. A continuation of “Frum” (Yeshivish, Litvish) Judaism with some small changes. 2. Chasidism 3. Reform, & 4. Modern Orthodox.
    The Modern Orthodox approach says, “Torah & Mitzvos always come first & that must be the focal point of a Jew’s life. HOWEVER, if on a college campus a student can keep Shabbos (today many campuses have Eruvs), there’s a Kosher Dining Hall, there’s Jewish life (through Hillel, Chabad, etc) then there is nothing wrong with attending a Non-Jewish college. There’s nothing wrong with dressing like any other American & partaking in normal American life.
    Thyi preceded RJBS by many years.

    in reply to: Rabbi J.B. Soloveitchik — A Godol B’Kiruv #2374523
    Kuvult
    Participant

    A little history lesson.
    Due to the Jewish & Non-Jewish enlightenment, the Emancipation of the Jews, Revolutions, Urbanization, a greater reliance on science, etc. there was a crisis in Traditionalist Judaism. Several responses occurred. 1. A continuation of “Frum” (Yeshivish, Litvish) Judaism with some small changes. 2. Chasidism 3. Reform, & 4. Modern Orthodox.
    The Modern Orthodox approach says, “Torah & Mitzvos always come first & they must be the focal point of a Jew’s life. HOWEVER, if on a college campus a student can keep Shabbos (today many campuses have Eruvs), there’s a Kosher Dining Hall, there’s Jewish life (through Hillel, Chabad, etc) then there is nothing wrong with attending a Non-Jewish college. There’s nothing wrong with dressing like any other American & partaking in normal American life.
    This preceded RJBS by a long time.

    in reply to: Exorbitant Filter Pricing #2373520
    Kuvult
    Participant

    I wonder how much those complaining about the cost of filters spend to buy the “Most Mehudar” Esrogim?

    in reply to: How Trump can become problematic #2372206
    Kuvult
    Participant

    The whole world knows (& works based on it) that America doesn’t keep it’s commitments. This is not a “Trump” thing. It’s why Israel worked with Russia & China in some areas to somewhat cover themselves if America stopped supporting Israel.
    When WWII ended & Germany was carved up it was split between America, Russia, England & France.
    Why did France deserve a part? They surrendered & even helped the Nazis. The truth is they didn’t deserve it. But, England pushed for it because they were afraid America as is our custom would pack up & leave leaving England alone to face the Soviets. England demanded including France so at least if America left they’d have another country to face the Soviets.

    in reply to: Shidduch Crisis Idea #2368206
    Kuvult
    Participant

    The era of the “Coercive Kehilla” ended centuries ago never to be resurrected (except somewhat by Chasidim) again.
    As one Rabbi wrote, “The people who think Rabbanim can just wave a magic wand & have the Kehilla do their bidding are sadly mistaken.”

    in reply to: Learning Chasidus #2356630
    Kuvult
    Participant

    These sects did not start in the same way.
    Many Rabbis were Misnagdim that converted & brought some of their baggage with them.
    The Divrei Chaim mentioned above is a perfect example.
    He was a Rosh Yeshiva who was the son-in-law of another big Rabbi the Baruch Taam. He was part of the scholarly elite. So it’s not surprising when he “switched sides” he brought the focus on learning normative subjects with him.

    in reply to: Self appointed people #2356097
    Kuvult
    Participant

    Common,
    My point was HOW he was appointed. It was done by one man, Schiff. Did Schiff ask others? Did Schiff consult with leaders of the different Jewish denominations? Was a vote taken?
    True Straus was appointed but who made Schiff leader of American Jews to decide who the 1st Jewish cabinet member would be?
    Again it goes back to the original question. Schiff worked his way into the highest levels of govt by being rich, influential & well connected (just like Simon Wolf) which caused him to be considered the leader of American Jews despite not being appointed, voted for or deciding on by the rest of American Jews.

    in reply to: Self appointed people #2355735
    Kuvult
    Participant

    You can either be appointed or assume the position by playing the right game. It helps to be rich, influential &/or well connected.
    Simon Wolf was considered to be the leader of American Jewry. He lived in Washington DC. Lincoln had an open door policy (as long as you were willing to wait) so anyone could see him. Wolf took the time & made the effort to meet with Lincoln about Jewish soldiers in the Union Army having issues & other Jewish matters. Over time they came to know each other well. The same with U.S. Grant.
    So of course when these Presidents needed to speak to the “representative” of the Jewish community they called on Wolf.
    Nobody appointed Wolf or voted for him. But by playing his cards right he became the defacto leader of American Jews. That’s how it often happens or a “Court Jew” will be asked for a candidate. When Teddy Roosevelt wanted to appoint a Jew to his cabinet he called his close friend Jacob Schiff. Schiff recommended Oscar (Asher) Straus of the famous Macy’s family.
    Usually it’s power & Gelt, &/or building connections with the right people.

    in reply to: Overuse of the word “neis” #2354116
    Kuvult
    Participant

    All over the Internet are pics of “Devout xtians” whose whole neighborhood burned down except their house. (Xtian) Bibles that survived when nothing else did.
    My Rebbe explained if Neisim only happened to Yidden we would lose our free will especially concerning the correct religion. How can a Yid be rewarded for following Judaism when he saw only Jewish holy objects experience Neisim? So yes, if unnaturally a Torah or a statue of Mary survives they are BOTH Neisim.

    in reply to: Warning you will regret not reading very word. #2354084
    Kuvult
    Participant

    1. Your name is very appropriate.
    2. You’re right. I won’t regret reading this. But I do regret the 45 seconds of my life reading this that I’ll never get back.

    Kuvult
    Participant

    I have a better idea. For every terror attack committed against America by a French Muslim, El Salvador, Finland & Thailand must pay America $1 billion.

    in reply to: Does Saying “CE” and “BCE” Kasher the Christian Calendar? #2348959
    Kuvult
    Participant

    AAQ,
    It was common to count the years from the beginning of the reign of the king (or president, PM, etc). See the Gemarah in Rosh Hashanah.
    The issue of replacing one king with another king when they assume the throne is not a problem.
    But, Yezus is not a “King” like Biden.
    Yezus is the “King of Kings & Lord of Lords”
    So it’d be improper & blasphemous to replace him with a “Regular” King.
    (How i know all this? Don’t ask:-)

    in reply to: Does Saying “CE” and “BCE” Kasher the Christian Calendar? #2348321
    Kuvult
    Participant

    Technically the correct way to write “2025”
    Is “2025 years from the birth of our Lord & Savior”
    “Anno Domini” means “Year of our Lord”
    I think that’s the problem some Jews have.
    While every way you look at it we use the Christian calendar there is some difference between (with no choice) recognizing the date used in the culture we live in & outright referring to Yezus as “Our Lord”

    in reply to: New Year #2347610
    Kuvult
    Participant

    Ever heard of “New Year’s Resolutions”?
    That’s where people look back at the past year & see things they regret or didn’t do as well as they should of & resolve to make a fresh start & do better this year.
    How is that different than Rosh Hashanah?
    “It is important to compare lehavdil the Jewish New Year and the secular New Year.”
    Why is it “Important” to compare?
    Is it a contest?

    in reply to: Cholov Stam or Fraud #2343280
    Kuvult
    Participant

    It depends on the community.
    In the communities that prefer darker clothing & bigger hats Cholov Stam is worse.
    For those that allow lighter clothing & smaller/no hats Fraud is worse.

    in reply to: Origins of Muslim Anti-Semitism #2340014
    Kuvult
    Participant

    Neville Chamberlain,
    “We are to them as the Amalekim were to us.”
    It always amazes me how Yidden instinctively understand we don’t follow the literal Torah. But instead we follow the modern day interpretation of the Rabbanim.
    There are a lot of smart Jews. Why aren’t the Rabbanim calling to raise millions of dollars to isolate the “Amalek” gene so we can perform this Dioraisa mitzvah?
    The truth is we have no interest in performing this mitzvah at the current time. We avoid it by claiming 1. We don’t know who Amalek is though with it being Biblical we SHOULD be, but are not Machmir.
    2. A more modern approach is Amalek is the evil inside of us we need to get rid of. Either way no Jew that I know is working on a plan to fulfill this Mitzvah.
    The Christians of today are different than those of yesteryear. In the past they believed they were doing a big Mitzvah converting Jews by any means necessary. Today it’s all about love, only love. They donate to Jewish causes, they help Jews, they try to convert us through “Good Works”
    This can (& G-d willing soon) & will happen with Muslims as well. Taking the LITERAL text of the Torah, Xtian Bible &/or Quran & claiming this is the final word of G-d which is not subject to interpretation by their respective religious leaders & scholars is unsophisticated thinking. If we do it constantly so can other religions.

    in reply to: Bli Neder no music until all hostages are free #2332944
    Kuvult
    Participant

    Bli Neder no Matza 30 days before Pesach unless the hostages are free.

    in reply to: Am I A Hypocrite? Or Just Plain Selfish? #2332366
    Kuvult
    Participant

    Square Root,
    Why did the Torah have to come from an “Orthodox Shul”?
    Every Orthodox, Conservative & Reform Shul has the exact same Torah. If it’s Kosher it’s Kosher &
    What better way to show Kavod HaTorah then to take a Torah from a Reform Shul & “elevate” it to being used by Torah true Yidden?

    in reply to: Not every chabadnik is meshichus and we need to see that line #2326561
    Kuvult
    Participant

    The sad tuth is most are Meshichists. Some I’ve asked gave me an explanation that avoided these problems but isn’t the greatest answer either as it can apply to many Jews who died.
    I know a person who comes from a Frum background that discovered their ancestors who came to America were Chabad Chasidim so they became Chabad.
    They told me they purposely have never visited 770 or the Ohel to distance themselves from this “Meshichist narishkeit”
    They may be a minority but there are some Chabadniks that totally reject the Rebbe is Moshiach concept (& think it’s damaging to the movement) & stick to “Old School” Chabad Chasidus.

    Kuvult
    Participant

    Ujm,
    I always appreciate the “Frummer” among us who show up wearing their stained “Davening jacket” with a torn pocket & missing button along with their “Shabbos hat” that became a “Weekday Davening hat” because it’s faded & been sat on too many times.
    Certainly more fitting to talk to the King of Kings than a man wearing pressed beige khakis & a blue polo shirt.

    Kuvult
    Participant

    Let me try to clarify (especially for our Kanoyim). Admittedly there’s not many serious halachik issues with making a Siyum.
    It’s the 9 days & your neighbor invites you to a Siyum to eat meat.
    1. He says, “I really want to eat meat so this morning I spent 3 hours listening to the 5 minute Daf of Taanis. The funny thing is I don’t even own a Masechta Taanis nor have I ever even looked into a Gemarah Taanis in print or online.”
    Would you feel comfortable eating meat based on this Siyum on Taanis?
    2. He says, “I really want to eat meat so over the last 3 days I opened a Gemarah Taanis & read every word. Now, I don’t know a word of Aramaic & have absolutely no idea about anything the Gemarah is talking about but I can read Hebrew letters (I probably mispronounced half the words) so I’m making the Siyum based on finishing Taanis because i read the entire Masechta.
    Would you feel comfortable eating meat based on this Siyum on Taanis?
    My point is there has to be some lower threshold of what is considered “Learning” a Masechta that allows one to make a Siyum (especially during the 9 days)?

    in reply to: US Thad Missiles and Troops to Israel. Beware of MAGA Isolationism #2325081
    Kuvult
    Participant

    US soldiers should not be in Israel. That’s bad enough. But if Ch’V an American soldier gets killed both sides will be screaming to get away from israel & you can’t blame them.

    in reply to: Should America Offer Israelis a Safe Haven? #2320226
    Kuvult
    Participant

    Gardol & Modern,
    It’s easy to cry Racism & Antisemitism when things don’t go your way.
    One thing I love about my history teacher is he always explains the other side & what were they thinking. That doesn’t mean you agree, just why they did what they did
    First, no one had any idea about a Holocaust in the 1930s because even the Nazis hadn’t thought about it.
    Second, fleeing persecution & tyranny, Hadn’t Jews been doing that forever? & (I know people hate when I speak the truth but the Emes is the Emes) Just take the Tsars. They went after the Jews & OTHER MINORITIES, Why? Because he didn’t care about the people or human rights. He wanted peace & quiet & what’s the best way to achieve that? By making everyone the same. If everyone in Russia including the Jews & other minorities were converted into Russian Orthodox Christians & proud, loyal, patriotic Russians he’d have nothing to worry about. Same with the Soviets. Should America have taken in tens of millions of persecuted Jews & Non-Jews from all over the world?
    In 1938 unemployment was 19%!!! In 1939 it was 17.2%!!!!
    Is it wrong for a country to say they’re going to make sure their own citizens have jobs before letting in foreigners to take them?
    If you were the President with massive unemployment would you do anything differently?
    & Now the hardest part for Yidden to hear.
    Eastern European Jews were described as having “Strange customs & Shiftless ways”
    Look at an Eastern European Jew through the eyes of a Non-Jewish American. Funny hair, funny clothes, don’t speak a “real” language, not modernized, uncultured, unwesternized, little to no secular education, & very few having useful skills to bring with them.
    Do you give the job of janitor at a factory to an immigrant Jew or an unemployed American citizen?
    The other issue we hate to discuss is at that time Communism was very popular & while understandable at the time, MANY Jews were into Communism. The US govt was full of Communists (many of them Jews) in every Dept. The US knew we’d be at war with Communism. If you were in charge would you allow thousands upon thousands of JEWISH (the most disciplined, hard working,) Communists into your country?
    p.s. When we claim these attitudes were due to Antisemitism of a perfectly innocent people let’s just look at the present. How many Jews refused to follow masking rules (whether it was right is immaterial, it’s about being good honest lawful citizens of the US & not as they were described having “Shiftless ways”). How many Shul’s locked the front door BUT OPENED THE BACK DOOR to continue holding services? How many of our schools renamed themselves as “Daycare” in order to stay open during Covid? How many weddings & funerals were illegally held cuz “We know better than the Goyim.”?
    How many times have Heimish schools been raided by the FBI for “theft of services” by misappropriating govt grants? I’m not saying all Jews cuz it’s not but we also can’t deny even today many of us see the govt as an enemy that needs to be beaten at its own game by “Pulling Shtik” or crying “Antisemitism”
    I have a hard time believing if a Non-Jewish minority in South America were being persecuted like the Jews in Eastern Europe were in the 30’s & you were facing many challenges at-home that as President you would say, “Sure, let’s take in 5, 6, or 9 million of these people.”
    When you look at this issue as an AMERICAN instead of a JEW you quickly understand why what happened, happened & it wasn’t simply based on Racism & Antisemitism.
    Did Antisemitism probably play some role? Yes. But it wasn’t “We can easily take in & absorb these people but the only reason we won’t is because we hate Jews.”

    in reply to: Should America Offer Israelis a Safe Haven? #2319978
    Kuvult
    Participant

    Modern,
    It’s pretty obvious to me (I wrote it) that “for a while” didn’t mean R’ Rice was Orthodox “for a while” then wasn’t.
    It meant he was the only “Real=Orthodox” Rabbi in America “for a while” as in THE ONLY ORTHODOX RABBI IN AMERICA UNTIL OTHER ORTHODOX RABBIS CAME.

    in reply to: Should America Offer Israelis a Safe Haven? #2317924
    Kuvult
    Participant

    SQUARE ROOT,
    I’m sure it’s elsewhere online but my source is an article by Yitzchak Levine (who I believe is a historian from the NY area) printed in the Baltimore monthly magazine (R’ Rice served in Baltimore) Jan. 2014 issue of where-what-when. It’s a fairly long article covering his life & fights with Reformers in his Shul & elsewhere, as well as his movement to establish strict Orthodoxy in America.

    in reply to: Why do regular ol’ chicken eggs need a hechsher? #2317323
    Kuvult
    Participant

    My Ruv (& noted Posek) has been having a very difficult time with this issue. After much research & discussion with other major Poskin he made a compromise ruling.
    Men in our Shul that eat eggs without a Hashgacha may still be given Aliyah’s but the Tzibur should not answer Amen to his Brochos.

    in reply to: Should America Offer Israelis a Safe Haven? #2316799
    Kuvult
    Participant

    Square Root,
    We should go back to the beginning. This is from a letter Rabbi Avraham Rice, the first “Real” (& for a while only) Ruv in America wrote to his Rebbe in Germany. (c.1840’s-1850’s)
    “One more thing I wish to disclose to you my revered master and teacher…and my soul weepeth in the dark on account of it, namely, that the character of religious life in this land is on the lowest level; most of the people are eating non-kosher food, are violating the Shabbos in public…and there are thousands who have been assimilated among the non-Jewish population and have married non-Jewish women. Under these circumstances, my mind is perplexed, and I WONDER WHETHER A JEW MAY LIVE IN A LAND SUCH AS THIS.”

    in reply to: Should America Offer Israelis a Safe Haven? #2316770
    Kuvult
    Participant

    UJM,
    FDR didn’t close the doors. They were already closed by the 1924 Johnson Reed Immigration Act.
    It sounds simple to you because you think the world revolves around Jews. Wake up call, it doesn’t.
    Look at what was going on in America & the world then & any normal person sitting in the oval office would’ve done the same thing as FDR (perhaps besides sending the Jews on the St. Louis back).

    in reply to: Should America Offer Israelis a Safe Haven? #2316420
    Kuvult
    Participant

    You have no right to be upset with America not accepting European Jews. They had very valid & legitimate reasons for not doing so.

    in reply to: A Moment of Unity: YU & Telshe #2314486
    Kuvult
    Participant

    You don’t discuss theology, argue Halacha or sit on a Bais Din with the Conservative or Reform.
    But when it comes to working together to make the community better or stronger you most certainly should work with them.

    in reply to: In search of an adjective #2314443
    Kuvult
    Participant

    Bloviation is a style of empty, pompous, political speech that originated in Ohio and was most notably used in his successful 1920 US presidential campaign by Warren G. Harding. He subsequently described it as “the art of speaking for as long as the occasion warrants, and saying nothing”. His opponent, William Gibbs McAdoo, compared it to “an army of pompous phrases moving over the landscape in search of an idea.”

    in reply to: A Moment of Unity: YU & Telshe #2314241
    Kuvult
    Participant

    Much of this talk about Achdus is just talking. In practice it’s, “I can’t work with people from a different group.” Or “My kids can’t be exposed to kids from a more modern family.”
    It’s always excuses. As Gadol said it’s sad this is even newsworthy.
    I read a story from someone who attended a Levaya. The Niftar was a Centrist Modern Orthodox Jew who ran the Religious Zionists of America for decades. He helped found a Modern Orthodox, Coed, Ultra-Zionist day school.
    Who gave the hesped? The Ruv of Agudah!!!
    The Ruv said, “Mr. X and I had differing opinions on many issues but I held him in great regard.”
    The Ruv of Agudah being Maspid the President of Mizrachi.
    That’s what true Achdus looks like.

    in reply to: What is your most unpopular/controversial opinion or hot take? #2311063
    Kuvult
    Participant

    Participant,
    What do you mean? What do you want to know?

    in reply to: Zionism #2310633
    Kuvult
    Participant

    I remembered reading this written by a Talmid of Rav Ruderman.
    “I had conversations with him on numerous current issues. He was very tolerant and open to different points of view. His interest was learning Torah and teaching Torah. Unlike some others who still live in a bygone era and cannot deal with reality, he once told me “the state of Israel is a good thing, where would Jews have gone were there no State of Israel”. He encouraged all of us to go to Washington in 1967 during the Six Day War. He had compassion and deep understanding, the opposite of a fanatic.”

    in reply to: Zionism #2310055
    Kuvult
    Participant

    Menachem Shmei,
    “many chose (in their ignorance, thanks to the Zionist propaganda) to engage in waving the Zionist flag, etc., instead of engaging in true Judaism”
    I’m from a major Jewish community & the most well known & respected Chasidish Rebbe attended a local (not in the community) Pro-Israel rally. In the pics he’s holding a “Zionist flag”
    This Rebbe is engaged in “True Judaism” 24/7/365. Whether running his wonderful Shul, helping people, giving Shiurim, or teaching at schools.
    I think the difference is in many places Yidden fight or at best ignore each other until the Nazis take over. Where I’m from there’s a lot lower threshold that triggers cooperation. Yidden in Eretz Yisroel are being killed & held hostage. Antisemitism in America (& elsewhere) is skyrocketing. Perhaps (he does) this Rebbe has Chochma. When the Non-Frum Jews at the rally who only know how to wave a Zionist flag see a real Chasidish Rebbe in Chasidus garb right beside them also waving a Zionist flag the message that sends is priceless.

    in reply to: What is your most unpopular/controversial opinion or hot take? #2308919
    Kuvult
    Participant

    Chasidim who switch their vest for a Canon windbreaker & tie their Peyos up under their B&H Photo baseball cap before going to Atlantic City aren’t fooling anyone.

    in reply to: What is your most unpopular/controversial opinion or hot take? #2308341
    Kuvult
    Participant

    Yserbius,
    You’re exactly right though there’s an additional factor at play.
    With Civil War looming the President called for January 4, 1861 to be a day of prayer, fasting & humiliation when all should go to their houses of worship to cry out to G-d that a solution is reached instead of war. The Rav gave a strongly Pro-Confederate speech (it’s available online).
    New Orleans Jews being strongly Pro-Confederate wanted him as their Rabbi & made an offer.
    At the same time Lincoln tired of all the headaches coming out of Baltimore when 1,000 Union soldiers marched in, declared Baltimore to be under Union occupation & Martial Law. They immediately started rounded up influential secessionists & Confederate supporters. The Rabbi fearing being thrown in jail for however long the Union felt, fled Baltimore for New Orleans.

    in reply to: What is your most unpopular/controversial opinion or hot take? #2308224
    Kuvult
    Participant

    A VERY unpopular opinion is during the Civil War era which Rabbi sided with who.
    Jewish communities being relatively new, (the Jewish population in America jumped from around 15,000 Jews to 175,000 Jews from c.1840-1860), Jews generally sided with where they lived either because they agreed or because they didn’t want to stand out.
    But in border places like Baltimore, Jews like Non-Jews could choose which side they were on.
    The unpopular opinion is that it’s not surprising that the “Radical Reform Rabbi” was Pro-Lincoln, Pro-Union, Anti-Secession & Pro-Abolition, while the Frum Rabbi (recognized Talmid Chochem, Smicha from Pressburg, many years in Yeshiva, some of his psaks are still in force today) was Anti-Lincoln, Anti-Union, Pro-Secession & Pro keeping Slavery as it had been.
    Many Frum are embarrassed by this but looking at today with the Reform generally pushing for liberal values & progressive agendas & the Orthodox not so much is it surprising which Rabbi sided with the Union & which with the Confederacy?

    in reply to: What is your most unpopular/controversial opinion or hot take? #2308208
    Kuvult
    Participant

    GadolHadofi,
    (The Nazis loved propaganda & showing the world America was killing Jews by blowing them to pieces would’ve put the Nazis on cloud 9.)
    But anyway, my unpopular opinion is about bombing the tracks being impossible & wouldn’t have changed anything anyway.
    Anyone old enough has heard numerous times, me including from survivors, “FDR (Yimach) was an Antisemite. He refused to bomb the tracks to the camps.”

    in reply to: What is your most unpopular/controversial opinion or hot take? #2308206
    Kuvult
    Participant

    GadolHadofi,
    (The Nazis loved propaganda & showing the world America was killing Jews by blowing them to piece would’ve put the Nazis on cloud 9.)
    But anyway, my unpopular opinion is about bombing the tracks being impossible & wouldn’t have changed anything anyway.
    Anyone old enough has heard numerous times, me including from survivors, “FDR (Yimach) was an Antisemite. He refused to bomb the tracks to the camps.”

    in reply to: What is your most unpopular/controversial opinion or hot take? #2308161
    Kuvult
    Participant

    Smerel,
    Do you have your grandfather’s documents with his name when he got on the boat & the new name when he exited Ellis Island? Surely you &/or the “people you know” would have the records. That’s generally not something you throw out.
    More strangely this concept doesn’t appear until around the 1970’s (amazing with all the literature from 1910-1970 authors never mentioned this concept or used it as a plotline).
    Interestingly enough the best guess how this myth went viral is a scene from “The G-dfather” where an Italian immigrant was taken into a room, given a list of American names by immigration officers & told to pick one (which of course is total fiction) but with a surge in ethnic pride during this period people including Jews latched onto this myth without bothering or more likely not interested in finding out if it was true.

    in reply to: What is your most unpopular/controversial opinion or hot take? #2308136
    Kuvult
    Participant

    GadolHadofi,
    I could write a long preface about what would’ve changed?
    Auschwitz was not chosen at random. There were over 40 rail lines nearby.
    Instead I’ll tell you about the “Bielefeld Viaduct”
    This railway handled approximately 300 trains PER DAY!
    If it wasn’t the busiest Nazi railway it was in the top 3.
    This made it a #1 priority for the Allies.
    Why focus on the Viaduct instead of just “bombing the tracks”?
    Because the Germans weren’t stupid. Knowing the war effort relied on the trains they had plans in place to rapidly (usually just a few hours) repair any damage. Imagine driving a race car but not having a pit crew to service your car.
    But more importantly, over 4 years the Allies (sometimes Americans, sometimes British) bombed the Viaduct 11 times. Not a single bomb hit the Viaduct!!! A few landed close but caused a negligible amount of damage that affected nothing.
    Finally the British built a massive bomb that only needed to land close. Which it did & destroyed the Viaduct. This was in mid-March of 1945. Hitler was dead at the end of April. When the Allies bombed huge factory buildings 90% of the bombs missed the target.
    Good luck throwing something out of a moving airplane from 10,000 feet & hitting a target that’s about 7′ wide.
    HaRav Weissmandel was a great Tsaddik & Talmidim Chochem but based on what I wrote, as well as other factors I didn’t write, I (& others into this type of history) can’t possibly imagine if even if by some miracle bombs indeed hit some tracks how that would’ve changed anything.

    in reply to: What is your most unpopular/controversial opinion or hot take? #2308109
    Kuvult
    Participant

    A big part of the initial success of the Day School movement in America (most were founded around 1945-1955) was the Supreme Court ruling desegregating the public schools in 1954.
    Contrary to claims that the “The Jews” supported the Civil Rights movement (many did, many did not) when faced with the reality of actually having their kids go to school with Black kids they ran. If a Jewish family couldn’t move to an area with an overwhelmingly White &/or Jewish school district the next option was to send them to the Jewish school.
    The schools were more than happy to have the opportunity to teach these kids Torah true Yiddishkeit & perhaps have a positive affect on them. Which they had some successes.

    in reply to: What is your most unpopular/controversial opinion or hot take? #2308104
    Kuvult
    Participant

    A big part of the initial success of the Day Schools in America (most were founded around 1945-1955) was the Supreme Court ruling desegregating the public schools in 1954.
    Contrary to claims that the “The Jews” supported the Civil Rights movement (many did, many did not) when faced with the reality of actually having their kids go to school with Black kids they ran. If a Jewish family couldn’t move to an area with an overwhelmingly White &/or Jewish school district the next best option was to send them to the Jewish school.
    The schools were more than happy to have the opportunity to teach these kids Torah true Yiddishkeit & perhaps have a positive affect on them. Which they had some successes.

    in reply to: What is your most unpopular/controversial opinion or hot take? #2308029
    Kuvult
    Participant

    Smerel,
    This is why I posted this in a thread about “Unpopular opinions” It’s a MYTH people’s name changed at Ellis Island. Do you or “people you know” have any proof? I highly doubt it.
    Some Jews did in fact change their name once in America but NOT at Ellis Island.
    “Was your name changed at Ellis Island? The simple answer is no. It never happened.
    Today there are millions of descendants of immigrants to the U.S. who firmly believe this myth and, despite continued efforts of prominent genealogists and immigration experts, it seems impossible to stamp it out.
    This could not have happened for the following reasons:
    1. The only thing the clerk did was check off the names on the passenger manifest that was compiled before the ship sailed from Europe (as I mentioned). The Ellis Island clerk never asked the immigrant his or her name.
    2. In any case, some 30% of the immigration clerks were themselves multi-lingual immigrants and some 60 languages were spoken, with translators available at all times (as I mentioned 9 Yiddish speaking translators, there was ALWAYS Yiddish speakers available to translate).
    3. There was no name change form or any process for an immigration clerk to change a person’s name. It was not a court of law.
    “According to the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service senior historian Marian L. Smith:

    The report that the clerk “wrote down” the immigrants surname is suspect. During immigration inspection at Ellis Island, the immigrant confronted an inspector who had a passenger list already created abroad. That inspector operated under rules and regulations ordering that he was not to change the identifying information found for any immigrant UNLESS requested by the immigrant, and UNLESS inspection demonstrated the original information was in error.”

    in reply to: What is your most unpopular/controversial opinion or hot take? #2307909
    Kuvult
    Participant

    Bombing the tracks to the camps would’ve stopped the Holocaust is not true at all.

    in reply to: What is your most unpopular/controversial opinion or hot take? #2307732
    Kuvult
    Participant

    Everyone who has claimed & some still claim that “Jews (or Antisemitic officials) changed their last name at Ellis Island is very mistaken as it almost never happened because it was virtually impossible for it to happen.
    A captain is responsible for everyone on his ship. So he has to have accurate records of who is on board. In order for a Jew (& Non-Jew) to board they needed to show the ship line their paperwork so it could be properly recorded.
    Upon arrival at Ellis Island the immigration officials would take the Captains log to work off of. The wait in line was long. There were 9 Yiddish speaking employees (not officers just civilians) that would go up & down the line explaining to the Jews the process, arrange the documents, tell them what to say, etc). So when a Jew finally came before an officer, the officer had their name in Europe in the Captains log as well as the paperwork with their real name. A few people had a letter left out one brother “Goldstein” & the other “GoldsHtein” But that a Jew walked onto Ellis Island “Goldstein” & walked “Johnson” is a complete myth.
    So if anyone claims that tell them they’re wrong. Which some don’t like hearing.

    in reply to: What is your most unpopular/controversial opinion or hot take? #2307454
    Kuvult
    Participant

    I was actually gonna start my own post (I still might) but here goes nothing.
    The belief that “Antisemitism is NEVER our fault.” is not true.
    Sometimes knowingly or not we bring it upon ourselves due to our actions or behavior.

Viewing 50 posts - 1 through 50 (of 355 total)