Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
JotharMember
when I joined, the posted terms were different. They changed in middle. I accepted the old, but not the new.
{I retain all copyrights to this post, but feel free to monetize it anyway}
JotharMemberWhat’s the issur?
JotharMemberAs Shlomo hamelech said, “for a living dog is better than a dead Mac OS X Lion”..
the saddest part is that for his wake they’ll dress him in a suit, and he’ll look like Mr. PC…
{the above content is now the exclusive property of YWN}
ka-ching! -95
JotharMemberCharlie, I wouldn’t say “itching to post”, as this place is bittul zman that takes away from my cert studying.
As for BMG bochurim- I have a solution: get a kosher phone AND a 3G tablet, which can have internet and a texting app, and technically doesn’t violate the letter as it’s not a phone! Koach deheteira adif indeed!
{Monetizable content above}
JotharMemberThx, Charlie…hataras nedarim finally passed…figured I would spend a bit of time here having fun and creating content to be monetized before getting back to cert studying…
{monetizable content above}
JotharMemberMarrieds are allowed. Internet is banned as well.
{this post is being monetized}
JotharMemberCoffee room rules say:
Anything you submit becomes the property of YWN.
So the editor is within his legal right to deny bombmaniac’s request. It’s ywn’s post now to monetize.
And I’m within my legal rights to boycott ywn and ywn coffee room until bombmaniac’s request is granted.
So this is my last post and visit bl”n until I have been informed by one of the mods that his request has been granted.
JotharMemberThe one at Citifield by the mets sued to be open on shabbos. Vaad policy is not to give hashgacha to a place open on shabbos.
JotharMemberI was told by my “Chosson rebbe” that having beds of different sizes is a lack of tznius, vehamayven yavin. My Rosh hayeshiva zt”l was against larger beds but i only found this out after I purchased mine. As always ask your LOR or halachic advisor.
May 8, 2011 4:44 am at 4:44 am in reply to: Doing Something L'Ilyui Nishmas A [Purposeful] Suicide #764764JotharMemberMosherose, if your svara was correct, then nobody should say kaddish for their parents- if they’re in gehinnom, they deserve to be there. Clearly we rachmanim bnei rachmanim don’t say “Let them rot in Gehinnom”. Also,
Rabbi Meir Davened that his rebbe Acher should be accepted into Gehinnom (he was too much of a rasha to even be allowed to purge his soul in gehinnom), and Rabbi Yochanan davened 150 years later that he should be allowed out of gehinnom into Gan Eden. Clearly, we don’t say “he’s a rasha let him burn”.
Wolfish, as for your main question, some years years ago I was in attendance in Israel for a hachnasas Sefer Torah Israel. the person who spoke kept saying how he was a sweet neshama and he was sick for many years. I thought it was a “yenner machala” case. Then I found out from someone who was from the same city as the person in question that it was a suicide case. I was told by my friend who was a gabbai that the yeshiva was reluctant to accept the Sefer Torah. Yet they relented, and we had a hachnanas sefer Torah. I do remember reading that today we assume people are sick in the head, and don’t have the din of me’abed atzmo le’daas. So as always, ask your LOR.
JotharMemberI personally am concerned for Joseph.
JotharMemberK9 is available for Macintosh as well.
Opendns is also available for any computer for free. Just set (or have your local techie set) your dns server on your router to 208.067.222.123. This blocks the worst of the worst, although you may want something more comprehensive. If so, have your local techie set you up with the full opendns (customizable categories, and the techie will install the “dynamic dns updater” software for you, which is available on mac as well.)
JotharMemberI would like to qualify bombmaniac’s statement by saying that there are programs you don’t recognize but are still legit. Write down the EXACT names and google them. A good place to check is http://www.what-is-exe.com/. If you still don’t recognize it, spyware/malware. Many well-written malware programs will just re-insert themselves into the startup, which is why booting into safe mode and running antivirus is a great idea.
JotharMemberAlso, try start-run, and type in taskmgr.exe If you can’t kill the virus process, you might need a tool called unlocker.
JotharMemberIt might be a virus/malware. Boot the computer in safe mode (press f8 when booting), and while in safe mode see if you can get to task manager. Then run virus checkers. Panda Cloud Antivirus, Malwarebytes Anti Malware, and Super anti spyware are 3 good free virus checkers.
You can also download something from microsoft called process explorer. It’s like Task manager but more powerful.
JotharMemberIf goyim knew the power of Torah they would support it. However, they don’t because they don’t support parochial education. Nothing to do with anti-Semitism. Canada supports Catholic schools, but no other parochial education. Not everything is Eisav Sonei es Yaakov.
April 27, 2010 10:52 pm at 10:52 pm in reply to: Should BMG Have A Say In Lakewood Politics? #824097JotharMemberBMG has a right to have a say. That said, many chashuveh rabbonim endorsed Christie, against the Vaad’s recommendations.
JotharMemberIt’s no secret. Yeshivas with no outside cost-control oversight plus parents supporting multiple children in learning plus banning college for other kids= a system where unless you’re a gvir, you’re in trouble.
JotharMemberWhen I was a kid, we would ask “Where is Eliyahu Hanovi? Where is Moshiach?” Today we ask “Where is Fiveish?”
JotharMemberIf they meant Lakewood yeshivish in penimiyus, then Shlomozalman pretty much nailed it, although a family like that will not have any money. If they meant Lakewood yeshivish in chitzonius, then Shlomozalman’s definition doesn’t apply. There are those who want mechutanim mit gelt but who appear yeshivish.
JotharMemberI am quite aware it’s an Internet prank. It’s also very old- nobody uses “sysop” anymore. Reminds me of my old BBS days with my 2400 baud modem.
JotharMemberYEARLY INTERNET MAINTENANCE ANNOUNCEMENT
IT IS URGENT THAT YOU DO NOT CONNECT TO THE INTERNET FROM MARCH 31st 23:59 GMT (11:59 PM) UNTIL 00:01 GMT (12:01 AM) APRIL 2nd.
It’s that time again. As many of you know, each year the Internet must be closed down for a 24 hour period of time in order to receive maintenance, or a “Tune Up” if you will.
Many dead links on the World Wide Web will be removed, as well as ftp links that are no longer used. Lost e-mail will also be removed from the system at this time.
In addition to the normal maintenance to be completed this year, we will also be using new high pressure information jets to clear out the bottlenecks that have plagued the internet so greatly this past year.
Although the down time for maintenance will be an inconvenience for many people, you will find this will allow for a much more efficient and faster responding internet.
This year, the “Tune Up” will occur from 23:59 GMT (11:59 PM) on March 31st until 00:01 GMT (12:01 AM) on April 2nd. During that 24 hour period, dozens of powerful Internet bots at key locations around the globe will simultaneously scan the Internet and complete the desired maintenance jobs wherever they may be required.
To help protect any valuable data you may have on the Internet from possible corruption, we highly recommend you take the following steps before this 24 hour maintenance period begins:
-1. Disconnect all terminals and LANs from the Internet.
-2. Disconnect all Internet servers from the Internet.
-3. Refrain from connecting any computer, or any other Internet connection device, to the Internet in any way.
Note: The term “other Internet connection device” includes such devices as WebTV.
Again, we understand the inconvenience this will cause many people. And for that, we apologize. However, the great increase in Internet performance you will experience after this short period of maintenance, will far outweigh any problems it will cause.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
Mr. Yuben T. Ricked
Global Internet Maintenance Organization
Department of Prankology
Webmasters and Sysops: It is very important that the entire Internet community be notified of the upcoming Internet maintenance before it gets underway. Please direct all of your users and personnel to read this notice ASAP!
JotharMemberRav Kook ZT”L didn’t seem to halachically pasken they couldn’t. He just felt it would be destructive to family life. He would agree that in today’s society, where it’s not, women have full suffrage rights. This is why quoting old teshuvos based on a completely different social structure is dangerous. This is also why you need a rav instead of paskening out of a sefer.
JotharMemberPC Magazine said you can soak a keyboard in distilled water and let it dry for 2 days.
JotharMemberVolvie, I didn’t know you were a talmid of Rav Kook ZT”L. For the rest of us, something is muttar until you know it’s assur, and Rav kook ZT”L had a svara not a sourced halacha. when the Gedolim issue proclamations to vote, they don’t write “men only”. Therefore, I have to assume that most gedolim hold it’s ok.
JotharMemberKashrus is just one pitfall of a hotel. Tznius is another. Perhaps if we wouldn’t elevate Pesach cleaning into spring cleaning, people wouldn’t just give up and go to hotels. Hotels used to be for people who just couldn’t make their own- the sick, elderly, or those with no place to go. Hotels were for people who couldn’t go anywhere else.
JotharMemberOrchos Tzaddikim- amazing sefer. Shaar hakinah in the sefer and related she’arim.
JotharMember“Greeced” is a variant of “greased”, a reference to the common misconception of yeshiva guys as having greasy (as opposed to clean) hair.
JotharMemberThe Ipad can’t even multitask, except through wacky workarounds (streaming the sound through Safari, for example)
It will be a success, though, just because Steve Jobs made it. But the Android pads will be much more capable. Go for the cheaper, more capable Android OS pads.
JotharMemberIt’s the same as reading any other Chareidi newspaper. You scan the front of the Yated to find out who died.
JotharMemberYes there is such a group as JOFA. But that’s for a separate thread. they’re the ones pushing women’s laining, women’s prayer groups, women dancing with the Torah, women rabbis, etc.
JotharMemberMan yeshivas are banning these things. They are incredibly addictive and a waste of time. My wife complains that her boss is too busy with the blackberry to get any real work done.
JotharMemberChayey Adam says “nohagin ktzas simcha” at night.
JotharMemberVolvie, Getting drunk is NOT a religious obligation. Drinking- yes. Getting drunk, no. My yeshiva suspends drunk high school kids. Open up a Shulchan aruch or mishna Brurah, or ask your local beis midrash masmid to read the nosei keilim for you.
JotharMemberDrinking IS a part of Purim, and is a core part of the mitzvah. Drinking to sechok and holellus instead of simcha is not, and drinking to the point that one is mevatel mitzvos isn’t either. I look forward to reading Rabbi Rosenberg’s column, but i would like to see what he does with the consensus of poskim who hold that the common “rolling on the floor in vomit”-type drinking is completely assur, and is not the mitzvah. Even the chayey Adam holds that drinking where one ends up being mevatel brochos, bentching, maariv etc is completely assur. Passing out before bentching is completely assur (and yes I spent many years in yeshiva so don’t tell me this doesn’t happen).
JotharMemberBen Levi, for Orach Chaim the yeshivishe velt follows The Mishna Brurah. As he did not write on Yoreh Deah we follow the Chayey Adam, Pri Megadim, and Aruch Hashulchan, along with the psakim of Rav Moshe Feinstein zt”l. The Pri chadash also reads the gemara kepshuto, but says as we are mekulkal we shouldn’t follow it. Rabbeinu Ephraim does as well, but says it’s not lehalacha. I do not know what the Ben Ish Chai says lehalacha, but as I’m a litvak not a sefardi it’s irrelevant.
Volvie, if I’m attacking a straw man, what IS your position? how much should one drink? I’m sure you agree with kol hani poskim I quoted, so I’m interested in hearing what you ARE espousing, and why it’s therefore muttar to give a drink to a minor.
JotharMemberVolvie, I opened the sifrei halacha and didn’t FIND these “100% valid poskim who hold one should drink himself to the floor”. The ball is in YOUR court to find the mainstream poseik who backs up your view of the mitzvah. I quoted EVERY nosei keli on the pages of the Shulchan Aruch, and the ones in the back. I also quoted the poskim acharonim. I can’t find ANY who say that today one SHOULD be mekayem it “kepsheuto”. Please tell me who I missed. As I’m just a balabos, I’m sure there must be some lamdan in your beis midrash who knows the source for a “held-of poseik” who says one SHOULD drink himself to the floor. No such poseik in the Tur, Shulchan Aruch (Mechaber is pashtus agreeing with what he wrote in the Beis Yosef), mishna brura, aruch hashulchan, etc. “Oilem goilem” or “everybody does it” is not a poseik in my book. The mishna brurah is, and he disagrees with you. I can’t admit to a fact if no poseik I look at agrees with it.
The only tzad is the chayey Adam (who is NOT the yeshivishe olam’s poseik- the mishna brurah is). He says “chayav adam lehistaker, ulekol hapachos yosier mekedei ragilo”, but even he adds that 1. One who would be mezalzel in a mitzva shouldn’t get drunk and 2. One’s actions should be lesheim shomayim. As minors are much more likely to be mezalzel in mitzvos when they get drunk, one can’t even claim it’s a mitzvah according to the Chayey Adam.
But, as pointed out, the MAJORITY of poskim hold there is no MITZVAH to do so, and according to many it’s an aveirah. So giving alcohol to someone who already had alcohol (assuming it’s the daytime, when there’s a chiyuv to drink) is a KULA, not a chumra, since according to most mainstream poskim there is no mitzvah to drink more, and according to the mishna brurah (THE poseik for the yeshivishe olam) one SHOULDN’T drink more. At night, of course, when there is NO mitzvah, then getting drunk is like any other day and it completely assur.
JotharMemberthe RCC of california says the opposite:
Rabbinical Council of California
In the recent weeks the Kashrut world has been preoccupied with the issue of worms in fish. The Anisakis
worm penetrates the stomach and from there it travels and lives inside the flesh! However, this insect is found
in some bodies of water and not others, hence the permissibility of some and prohibition of other members of
the same species.
After extensive research by Rabbis and experts globally, the following advisory has been issued:
All types of fish with the Anisakis worm in their flesh may not be used. These include:
_ Wild Salmon (e.g. Sockeye), Canned Salmon (wild). We are awaiting word from the
certifiers of canned salmon as to their future status.
_ Flounder: Yellow tail/ Wild Dabs/ Black Backs, Sole. At this time there are no known
fresh or frozen flounder fillets that are acceptable, even if certified (e.g Dagim,
Kinneret etc).
_ Wild Halibut, Sea bass a.k.a. Smoked Sable, Red perch, Scrod, Pollack, Cod,
Turbot and Butterfish are all problematic.
_All Farm Raised Salmon is acceptable.
_ Salmon: Wild: (Chinook) from British Colombia, New Zealand: May be used (they
are actually farm raised).
_ Tilapia, Carp, Pike, Herring fillet, Red Snapper, Tuna May be Used.
_ Fish products made from minced fish e.g. fish sticks are ok.
_ Lox are ok.
_ Halibut: Farm Raised is acceptable.
_ Cod :Farm Raised and Chatum are acceptable
_ Pollock : Chatum is acceptable
_ All Gefilte Fish is acceptable.
To recap:
_Butter Fish: May NOT be used
_Cod / Sable if Farm Raised or from Chatum: _May be used
_Cod /Sable (Smoked): May NOT be used
_Flounder: Fluke, Georges Banks, Channel, Tilapia: _May be used
_Flounder: Yellow fin sole, Dabs,(wild), Black Back: May NOT be used
_Hake: May NOT be used
_Halibut: Alaskan, Pacific, Atlantic: May NOT be used
_Halibut: Farm Raised: _May be used
_Pollock (Fresh & Frozen) from Alaska or China: May NOT be used
_ Pollock from Chatum: _ May be used
_Red Perch from Canada or Iceland: May NOT be used
_Salmon Wild: Alaskan (Sockeye): May NOT be used
_Salmon Wild: (Chinook) from British Colombia, New Zealand: _May be used
_Scrod: May NOT be used
_Sea Bass a.k.a. Smoked Sable from Chili or Peru: May NOT be used
_Sole (Yellow fin, rock sole): May NOT be used
_Turbot: Canadian Frozen: May NOT be used
JotharMemberBen Levi, what does “ad delo yada” mean according to your rabbeim?
JotharMemberBen Levi, by “mainstream” I mean the ikker poskim. The poskim quoted were the ones on the actual pages of the tur and Shulchan Aruch. the mishna Brura paskens like the Pri Megadim who paskens like the Pri Chadash. You can’t get more mainstream than these.
JotharMemberAnd kashrus organizations haven’t assured scotch yet.
JotharMemberVolvie, if I’m attacking a straw man,
1. what shita of drinking ARE you talking about and supporting, which agrees with all the poskim mentioned above and coincides with the “mitzvah” of giving alcohol to minors?
2. What shita of drinking are you against? You are already on record as supporting drinking until one throws up, which sounds like “Shichruso Shel Lot” to me.
JotharMemberFrom my post in the “minors and alcohol” thread:
I went through the poskim in order, with all of the major poskim covered- no cherry-picking or selective quoting. Feel free to double-check.
Let’s start off with the Tur, Orach Chaim 695.
1. The Beis Yosef (aka the mechaber in Orach chaim and the Mishna Brurah) quotes the Ran and Rabbeinu Ephraim- idchi ley maamar derava based on story of Rava and Rav Zeira. In other words, chayav inish is NOT lehalacha.
2. He then quotes the Orchos Chaim- levsuem IS kehalacha, but it doesn’t mean rolling on the floor drunk in your own vomit. To quote the lashon hakodesh,
????? ????? ????, ???? ?? ????? ????? ??? ???? ???? ?????? ????? ??????? ???? ???? ?????? ?????, ?? ????? ???? ??????? ???
“drunkenness is completely prohibited, and you do not find a bigger aveirah than it, as it causes illicit relations, murder, and many other sins besides. however one should drink a bit more than he is used to”. (translation mine)
3. On another point, the Beis Yosef says that there is no mitzvah to drink at night because it says YEMEI mishteh vesimcha- the DAYS of drinking and happiness.
4. The Bach says punkt fakehrt of how you quoted it. He does start off saying what you said, but lehalacha says like Rabbeinu Ephraim and the Ran- idchi ley. However, one should drink enough to be happy, and one should still have one’s wits about him (“daato alav”) even if he can’t stand in front of a king. This is NOT rolling on the floor in the vomit drunk. Furthermore, even THIS level is lemitzvah velo le’ikuva.
5. The maharsha in Bava metzia 21 agrees with this, and says a tzurva meirabanan (A real talmid chochom) is allowed to claim he reached a level of ad delo yada on Purim even though he was yada. Clearly no issur in remaining sober according the the Maharsha.
Now we move on to the Shulchan Aruch.
6. The Taz says a deep vort about how elevated arur haman is, but Baruch mordechai is even more sublime. you drink until you can’t comprehend this fine difference. This isn’t ROFIV (rolling on the floor in vomit) drunk either.The Taz explains the Rema like his shver the Bach- ein laasos kein- it’s assur to take the gemara literally as idchi ley like the Ran- we don’t pasken that way.
7. The Mogen Avraham says that Ad delo Yada means you can’t calculate gematrios of arur haman and baruch mordechai. Not ROFIV drunk either.
8. The Pri Megadim in the Mishbitzos Zahav approves of the Taz, and quotes the Pri chadash who agrees with this that “ein laasos kein” and says “vechein raui linhog”. See later for more on the exact wording of the Pri Chadash.
9. the Yad Ephraim says that one should drink to be happy, but not beyond that.
10. To be fair and honest, the Shaarei Teshuva quotes the Amudei Shomayim that his father used to be mekayeim the words kepshuto when he was younger. However, one shouldn’t do so if it leads to devarim shelo kehogen.
11. The Pri Chadash (the one quoted by the Pri Megadim in the mishbitzos) argues on Rabbeinu Ephraim whop said idchi ley, and holds that ad delo yada kepshuto is technically how we pasken. So theoretically one is doing a mitzvah by doing ROFIV. HOWEVER, now that the doros are mukulkalim (his words, not mine- since the generations are ruined, one SHOULDN’T drink so much, and by not drinking so much he’ll see blessing from heaven since he’s doing so lishmah. So he argues THEORETICALLY on the Ran and Rabbeinu Ephraim, but agrees PRACTICALLY.
12. Someone in the back of the Friedman edition Shulchan Aruch asks on the Rema why he wrote it the way he did, if it’s based on Rabbeinu Ephraim, and one SHOULDN’T drink that much. Regardless, the mishna brurah paskens like the Pri Megadim who paskens like the Pri chadash that one shouldn’t drink so much.
13. The Sefas Emes quoted by Volvie is on Megilla 7b, according to the Piskei teshuvos. I read it as saying one doesn’t need to get to ROFIV. The Piskei Teshuvos reads him as saying that one SHOULDN’T, just like the Yad Ephraim.
14. I did not look up the Chacham Tzvi.
15. As for the Shlah, I looked at the Kitzur Hashlah and he mostly rips the drinking going on as being sechok vehollelus instead of simcha shel mitzvah, and that people think the Torah doesn’t apply over Purim, and this is an “avon pelili-” a tremendous sin.
Bottom line- the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of mainstream poskim hold that one shouldn’t drink himself to ROFIV. The Pri chadash, who is halacha according to the Pri Megadim and Mishna Brurah, says that with the destruction of the generations, ad delo yada is like the mitzvah of yibum, NO LONGER APPLICABLE.
It is an AVEIRAH, according to many poskim (Ran, Rabbeinu Ephraim, Beis Yosef, Bach, Pri chadash, Pri Megadim, Mishna Brurah, Yad Ephraim, Shla”h), to drink to the point of shichruso shel lot. And NOBODY holds the Torah becomes hefker.
It is an AVEIRAH to give alcohol to any minor, even forgetting about dina demalchusa, as you would be causing them to violate the words of the poskim.
JotharMemberWOW. INCREDIBLE. Volvie, I just came back from the beis midrash to be me’eyein into the poskim, and EVERYONE you quoted says there’s NO mitzvah to drink to the point of shichruso shel Lot! And While roshei yeshiva do drink, they’re not “rolling on the floor in their vomit” drunk, certainly not like they “fir zich in Philly” (and other yeshivas- let’s not just pick on Philly).
I went through the poskim in order, with all of the major poskim covered- no cherry-picking or selective quoting. Feel free to double-check.
Let’s start off with the Tur, Orach Chaim 695.
1. The Beis Yosef (aka the mechaber in Orach chaim and the Mishna Brurah) quotes the Ran and Rabbeinu Ephraim- idchi ley maamar derava based on story of Rava and Rav Zeira. In other words, chayav inish is NOT lehalacha.
2. He then quotes the Orchos Chaim- levsuem IS kehalacha, but it doesn’t mean rolling on the floor drunk in your own vomit. To quote the lashon hakodesh,
????? ????? ????, ???? ?? ????? ????? ??? ???? ???? ?????? ????? ??????? ???? ???? ?????? ?????, ?? ????? ???? ??????? ???
“drunkenness is completely prohibited, and you do not find a bigger aveirah than it, as it causes illicit relations, murder, and many other sins besides. however one should drink a bit more than he is used to”. (translation mine)
3. On another point, the Beis Yosef says that there is no mitzvah to drink at night because it says YEMEI mishteh vesimcha- the DAYS of drinking and happiness.
4. The Bach says punkt fakehrt of how you quoted it. He does start off saying what you said, but lehalacha says like Rabbeinu Ephraim and the Ran- idchi ley. However, one should drink enough to be happy, and one should still have one’s wits about him (“daato alav”) even if he can’t stand in front of a king. This is NOT rolling on the floor in the vomit drunk. Furthermore, even THIS level is lemitzvah velo le’ikuva.
5. The maharsha in Bava metzia 21 agrees with this, and says a tzurva meirabanan (A real talmid chochom) is allowed to claim he reached a level of ad delo yada on Purim even though he was yada. Clearly no issur in remaining sober according the the Maharsha.
Now we move on to the Shulchan Aruch.
6. The Taz says a deep vort about how elevated arur haman is, but Baruch mordechai is even more sublime. you drink until you can’t comprehend this fine difference. This isn’t ROFIV (rolling on the floor in vomit) drunk either.The Taz explains the Rema like his shver the Bach- ein laasos kein- it’s assur to take the gemara literally as idchi ley like the Ran- we don’t pasken that way.
7. The Mogen Avraham says that Ad delo Yada means you can’t calculate gematrios of arur haman and baruch mordechai. Not ROFIV drunk either.
8. The Pri Megadim in the Mishbitzos Zahav approves of the Taz, and quotes the Pri chadash who agrees with this that “ein laasos kein” and says “vechein raui linhog”. See later for more on the exact wording of the Pri Chadash.
9. the Yad Ephraim says that one should drink to be happy, but not beyond that.
10. To be fair and honest, the Shaarei Teshuva quotes the Amudei Shomayim that his father used to be mekayeim the words kepshuto when he was younger. However, one shouldn’t do so if it leads to devarim shelo kehogen.
11. The Pri Chadash (the one quoted by the Pri Megadim in the mishbitzos) argues on Rabbeinu Ephraim whop said idchi ley, and holds that ad delo yada kepshuto is technically how we pasken. So theoretically one is doing a mitzvah by doing ROFIV. HOWEVER, now that the doros are mukulkalim (his words, not mine- since the generations are ruined, one SHOULDN’T drink so much, and by not drinking so much he’ll see blessing from heaven since he’s doing so lishmah. So he argues THEORETICALLY on the Ran and Rabbeinu Ephraim, but agrees PRACTICALLY.
12. Someone in the back of the Friedman edition Shulchan Aruch asks on the Rema why he wrote it the way he did, if it’s based on Rabbeinu Ephraim, and one SHOULDN’T drink that much. Regardless, the mishna brurah paskens like the Pri Megadim who paskens like the Pri chadash that one shouldn’t drink so much.
13. The Sefas Emes quoted by Volvie is on Megilla 7b, according to the Piskei teshuvos. I read it as saying one doesn’t need to get to ROFIV. The Piskei Teshuvos reads him as saying that one SHOULDN’T, just like the Yad Ephraim.
14. I did not look up the Chacham Tzvi…
15. As for the Shlah, I looked at the Kitzur Hashlah and he mostly rips the drinking going on as being sechok vehollelus instead of simcha shel mitzvah, and that people think the Torah doesn’t apply over Purim, and this is an “avon pelili-” a tremendous sin.
Bottom line- the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of mainstream poskim hold that one shouldn’t drink himself to ROFIV. The Pri chadash, who is halacha according to the Pri Megadim and Mishna Brurah, says that with the destruction of the generations, ad delo yada is like the mitzvah of yibum, NO LONGER APPLICABLE. It is a chumra to NOT give alcohol to anyone, as you would be causing them to violate the words of the poskim.
JotharMemberhudyrox, correct. No difference. The psak of ad delo yada doesn’t mean literal “shichruso shel lot” according to the mishna brurah, the poseik of the yeshivish world. It means drinking a bit more than usual and napping.
JotharMemberVolvie, how bochurim fir zich in Philly has no bearing on halacha. Last time I checked, the poskim for the litvish oilam were the Mishna Brurah and the Aruch Hashulcha. Furthermore, if you ask Rav Shmuel Kaminetzky Shlit”a what he thinks about how the bochurim in Philly fir zich on Purim, I’m sure his response won’t be as enthusiastic as yours.
Volvie, nothing you said contradicts anything I said, except I elaborated more as per the Mishna Brurah. you DISTORT the Rem”a when you quote him the way you do instead of the way I do, which is based on the lashon of the Mishnah Brurah. The Shl”a is NOT the derech haspak of Lita, which is why we Litvaks talk to our wives when they are nidos and wash negel vasser in the morning on our right hand instead of our left, and wash 3 times instead of 4. The Bach and the Chacham Tzvi were not basrai- the Pri Megadim and the Mishna Brurah are, and their psak that the “lesser psak” is PREFERRED is final. The Sfas emes is chassidish, and I’m referring to the litvish mesorah. My Rosh Hayeshiva ZT”L never drank himself to the point that he was rolling on the floor in his vomit, and used to always quote the Gr”a’s pshat in ad delo yada,which did not require so much alcohol. Which roshei yeshiva drink themselves into a drunken stupor? The fact that they don’t is the biggest proof that how the bochurim fir zich in Philly is not the preferred method of behavior, which is obvious to any bar bei rav dechad yoma who knows how to read a Mishnah Brurah. they are available in English as well.
JotharMemberThis is going to be a departure from the usual posts in this thread, as it will actually site sifrei halacha instead of “internet Torah” quoting various seforim or “boych svaros”.
There is usually an issur to be mevatel one’s daas, and the mitzvah of drinking by the sudas Purim is the exception to the rule. The mitzvah of drinking is connected with the seudah, and there is no mitzvah of seudah at night (OC and MB 695).
The Mishna Brurah (THE poseik for those in yeshivish circles, not the obscure seforim quoted as the heter) says (based on the Pri MeGadim) that the shita of the Rem”a is “raui laasos”- i.e, that is the PROPER shita to follow, NOT the shita of getting completely stoned. Therefore, giving alcohol to a yeshiva bochur is a VIOLATION of the halacha he should be following, even if it’s in the daytime, even forgetting about the secular laws of giving alcohol to minors. At night, of course, when there is no mitvah, it’s as assur as it always is to drink. The Shaarei Teshuva brings down that those who come to improper behavior should NOT drink more than usual, and quotes the gemara of Rabbi Yehuda bar Ilai who only drank on Pesach, meaning he never drank on Purim. So a real yeshiva bochur trying to fulfill the mitzvah as properly as possible will be following the Rem”a, NOT the other shitos.
The Beis yosef furthermore says (Brought down in Aruch Hashulchan 695) that drinking so much is ASSUR. If a bochur wants to drink that much, he is oveir an aveirah. So claiming a bochur who wants to reach shichruso shel Lot is being mekayem a mitzvah is wrong, as according to many mainstream poskim he is doing an aveirah. The Aruch Hashulchan holds the mitzvah is to drink, and drinking more than little bit is a reshus, whereas it’s usually assur. So if a yeshiva bochur comes to my house at night asking for alcohol, I tell him there is no mitzvah to drink at night, so it’s an aveirah. In the daytime, I say that the mitzvah is at the seudah. And at the seudah, I quote the mishna brurah. So Volvie, when should you give a bochur alcohol, even if there’s no sakanah problem (which there unfortunately is today)?
Bottom line for litvish yeshiva bochurim, and you can confirm it with the Mishna Brurah and the Aruch Hashulchan, along with Rav Shmuel Kaminetzky Shlit”a:
There IS a mitzvah to drink on Purim. The is, according to many poskim (among them the Beis Yosef), an AVEIRAH to drink to shichruso shel lot, as this leads to many aveiros. According to the Aruch Hashulchan, it’s a reshus to drink to that point, but the mitzvah is just a little bit. According to the Pri Megadim, who is seconded by the Mishna Brurah, the Rema’a method is the PREFERRED way. Finally, there is no mitzvah to drink at night. So by not giving a bochur alcohol, you are being MACHMIR on halacha, not meikel on halacha, even forgetting about chamira sakanta mei’issura.Volvie’s “common understanding of ad delo yada” has as much halachic standing as the common misconception that shalach manos needs to have 2 brachos. A little bit of light chases away much darkness.
JotharMemberRav Shmuel Kaminetzky Shlita, who’s on the Moetzes, clearly paskened against you, Volvie. So batla daatcha etzel rav Shmuel Kaminetzky Shlit”a unless you’re also on the Moetzes.
Furthermore, if the bochur suffer5s alcohol poisoning and seriously hurts himself, are you telling me there’s no teviah in shomayim for your role in giving a potential poison to smeone who’s clueless as to its effects?
JotharMemberVolvie, one doesn’t hava a halachic obligation to make sure a bochur fulfills HIS mistaken notion of what the shita is. As long as he drinks his revi’is and naps he is yotzei.
Secondly, there is no mitzvah to drink at night, so there is clearly no hciyuv to give a minor alcohol at night.
February 23, 2010 4:04 am at 4:04 am in reply to: Unfiltered Access to the Internet allowed? #675118JotharMemberOpendns and k9 filter your computer for free. Grey goose filters your vodka but they charge for it.
Volvie, so you agree that those who pass out in their vomit and miss the mitzvos deoraysah are not being mekayem a mitzvah?
-
AuthorPosts