Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
jewishperson803Participant
No one is talking about praying for goyim, so that’s just a strawman fallacy. The halacha, as codified in the Shulchan Aruch, is that a Jew is forbidden to bless a goy or praise a goy in any way. The Shulchan Aruch (YD 151:14) writes: โOne may not speak in their praise, even to say how beautiful or handsome or well formed they are, and definitely not to praise their actions or be enthralled with their wordsโ.
January 8, 2018 4:56 pm at 4:56 pm in reply to: Food warmed in a non-kosher microwave assur b’han’ah? #1445514jewishperson803ParticipantSechel HaYashar, you say that it may be assur be’hana’ah if it came in contact with it in the hot microwave, but according to those poskim who say that microwave cooking isn’t derech bishul, wouldn’t it be mutar b’hana’ah?
jewishperson803ParticipantIt is assur min haTorah to bless a goy. “Lo tischanen.”
January 7, 2018 10:48 pm at 10:48 pm in reply to: Food warmed in a non-kosher microwave assur b’han’ah? #1444334jewishperson803ParticipantIf it’s double-wrapped there’s no question that it can be eaten, and kal v’chomer it’s not assur b’han’ah. Obviously my question is where the food was not wrapped.
jewishperson803ParticipantThanks gadolhadorah. In a related question, if someone warmed pareve food in a dirty microwave that has been used to cook basar b’chalav and there is remnants of that food in the microwave, or he warmed milchig or fleishig food in a dirty microwave that had been used to cook the opposite and there was remnants of it in the microwave, would the resulting food become assur b’han’ah?
jewishperson803ParticipantWell I was able to find this topic on the wayback machine, where the Hebrew actually comes out. So the Aruch HaShulchan he quotes is this: ืจืื ืื ืืืคืืื ืืืขืช ืืืืจ ืืืฉ”ืข ืืืฉืืื ื ืจืืืฆื ืื ืืื ื ”ื ืืคืื ืืืื ืฉืขื ืคื ื ืืงืืจื ืืืคื ืื, ืืื ื ืืื ืืื ืืืฉ ืฉืืฉ ืื ืฉืื ืื ืืช ืืืื ืฉืฆืื ืืงืืจื ืืฉืจ ืฉืื ืืจืื ืืืืืฆื ืืื, ืืื ืืืื ืืืฉืืืื ืฉืื ื ืฉืืขืืงืจ ืืื ืืื ืืืจืืืคืื ืื ืชืคืืื ืืืื ืื ืืืืืืช, ืืืฉืจ ืื ืืขื, ืืื ืืืืืื ืืื, ืืฃ ืฉืืงืืจื ืืื ื ืจืืืฆื ื”ื ืื ืฉืขื ืคื ื ืืืืคื ืืื ืืื ืืืฉ ืืื ืืืืขื ืฉืืื ื ืจืืืื ืืืืืื ืืืื ืืฉ ืืืืฉืื ื ”ื ืืคืื ืืืืจ ืืขื”ืข ืืื ืขื ืื
Can anyone translate this please into English?
jewishperson803Participantyitayningwut said in the post up there: “1) Ein hachi nami, check to see if itโs clean.
2) Stam ???? ?โ?. Even though we donโt pasken that mamashus gets nifgam, see this lashon of the Aruch Hashulchan in 122:
???? ?? ?????? ???? ???? ???โ? ??????? ????? ?? ??? ?โ? ???? ???? ??? ??? ????? ??????, ???? ??? ??? ??? ??? ?? ??????? ???? ???? ????? ??? ??? ???? ?????? ???, ??? ???? ??????? ???? ?????? ??? ??? ???????? ?? ????? ???? ?? ??????, ???? ?? ???, ??? ?????? ???, ?? ?????? ???? ????? ?โ? ?? ??? ??? ????? ??? ??? ??? ??? ????? ????? ????? ?????? ???? ?? ?????? ?โ? ???? ???? ???โ? ??? ????”
Obviously whatever he quoted from the Aruch HaShulchan did not come through on this site. Does anyone know which Aruch HaShulchan he quoted, was it 122:8? And if so, can someone translate it? Thanks.
December 9, 2017 9:49 pm at 9:49 pm in reply to: question that will probably be controversial #1422995jewishperson803ParticipantApparently some editions have it as Sam2 said, my edition doesn’t.
December 9, 2017 7:54 pm at 7:54 pm in reply to: question that will probably be controversial #1422970jewishperson803ParticipantSam2 you said “Shmoolik: That is what the Kitzur SโA brings down which is presumably actually the Minhag nowadays. How that came to be I donโt know as it is a very minority Shittah.” Excuse me, but the Kitzur says the opposite of what you said he wrote. Why did you write this?
-
AuthorPosts