Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
JayMatt19Participant
@the litvishe kiryas Joseph
The chosson is ???? ????
That means the kallah is ???? ?????
Does not one stand to show honor to a king or queen?
JayMatt19ParticipantGiving brings one closer. Taking makes one resentful.
R’ Dessler speaks about this. He asks why it is that in ?? ?????? we see that the father does not intend on harming his son, yet we see that the son will harm the father.
February 3, 2013 4:20 pm at 4:20 pm in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927713JayMatt19Participant1. That gemarra is the one that Health was referring to when he said “It isn’t so pashut” http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/blaming-the-same-gender-unions-a-personal-rant/page/3#post-435118
So that has already been answered.
2. The Iyun Yaakiv there says that the tzaddikim aren’t punished for the same REASON as the reshaim, just at the same time. The tzaddikim have some minor flaw for which it is considered a chessed for them to be punished in this world, in order to be considered clean in the next world. This punishment is at the same time.
3. In regards to my opening post, even if you apply Kivan (which isn’t as simple as you make it), why justify a disaster with a non-applicable reason, limiting the mussar, when one can try to look in the mirror and improve themselves? (Which is what this initial topic was all about)
February 3, 2013 6:07 am at 6:07 am in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927711JayMatt19ParticipantSorry, was not able to look it up yet, hope to over the next few days.
But even if he says as you’ve quoted, that would prove yidden get caught in the punishment of other yidden.
The request has always been a proof that yidden can get “caught in the net” of a punishment for the goyim
Seems like the lekach tov is not a proof, based upon what you are quoting
February 1, 2013 1:25 pm at 1:25 pm in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927709JayMatt19ParticipantThe silence of klal Yisroel was its own independent aveira. Klal Yisroel basically said “we’ll be neutral and pick a side after we see who wins”
They were punished for not defending Moshe, and therefore by definition Hashem.
And the lekach tov isn’t chazal either, I’ll try to have a peek on shabbos to see it for myself
Have a great shabbos
February 1, 2013 5:33 am at 5:33 am in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927706JayMatt19ParticipantYou can call it a chazal all you want. Health backtracked and said it was a Malbim, and only according to one shitta in the gemarra. If you have different evidence that it is a chazal do share it.
Thanks
January 31, 2013 10:23 pm at 10:23 pm in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927704January 31, 2013 10:06 pm at 10:06 pm in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927703JayMatt19ParticipantYou are still trying to bring a proof from Lot, you can’t.
I’m asking for a proof that a YID can get punished for the actions of a goy, and you show me that Lot (a goy) needed special protection to be saved due to the actions of a different type of Goy.
I’m not saying that a goy who is anti-toeva can’t be punished along with a group of goyim who are pro-toeva. I agree, he can.
I’m not saying a Muslim can’t be punished along with a group of Antiests, he sure can.
I’m asking for a proof that a Yid can be punished due to the actions of a goy.
Shabbos Lamed Gimmel Amud Beis
?”? ??????? ??????? ???? ????? ??? ?? ??? ????? ??’ ????? ??’ ???? ??”? ????? ???? ?? ?????? ??? ?? ???? ?? ????? ???? ????? ?????? ??? ???? ??? ????? ???? ????? ??? ??????? ??? ???? ???? ??”? ?????? ?????? ??? ???? ????? ???? ?? ???? ???? ??? ????? ???? ???? ???? ???? ??????? ?? ????? ????? ????? ????? ???? ???? ??? ??????? ?? ????? ????? ??????? ???? ?’ ????? ???? ???? ????? ???? ???? ?? ???? ?????? ??????? ?? ?????? ????? ?????? ??????? ?? ????? ??????? ?????? ??????? ?? ?????
Why did R’ Shimon need to answer why the babies suffer? Say teva “Well, mom and dad have it, so obviously the baby gets it”, Why not Oy L’Rasha or kivan…?
These answers weren’t good enough for R’ Shimon, and he had to have a reason why each man, woman and child independently sinned and thus were punished
January 30, 2013 4:19 pm at 4:19 pm in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927697JayMatt19ParticipantAt this point in the discussion, I’m just viewing the Torah parts and trying to debate them as I would in yeshiva. I enjoy this, as I’ve looked up all the sources here and thank you all for giving me where to look and what to learn.
If this is too tedious for you, I’ll stop
1. Lot was a rasha at the time, with a zechus. His zechus was keeping quiet in mitzrayim about Sarah. R’ Dessler asks why this was the zechus which saved him, and not his hachnasas orchim in sdom, which nearly got him killed by the natives.
2. Lot in no way can be a proof. He was a Goy! He never fully joined Avraham, and, in fact, his descendants, in part, were forbidden to become gerim
I have, in no way, ignored chazal. Still waiting to see that a yid gets punished for a goy’s actions.
And if that is the case, still awaiting proof that our role as Frum yidden is to try to protest and educate the goy. If anything, I’d think such actions of the goyim should awaken us to do more mitzvos, work on our avodas Hashem, as we might need many more zechusim than usual
January 30, 2013 6:11 am at 6:11 am in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927688JayMatt19Participant2. We see from Chazal that protesting is sometimes called for. There are other cases, by goyim, too, such as Moshe Rabbeinu when Yisro’s daughters said Ish Mitzri, etc.
I can’t tell you one can directly extrapolate from Korach to this. But the concept is definitely there, and if gedolim say to protest it then this Chazal seems to be at least a “deyka” or indicator that this is, in fact, correct.
3. Lot would have been destroyed in Sedom, too, were it not for Avraham Avinu. The shachain part may refer to Jews (or may refer to non-Jews, too). But it’s not only a Jewish-Jewish relationship.
Let me get this straight. I bring a proof directly from R’ Shternbuch, who says to go to one protest, and only one protest. And R; Eliyashiv, zt”l, who never said to go to such a protest, yet did say to go to another (Emmanuel). And that can’t be learned from. Yet the fact that Moshe was watching Yisro’s daughters getting attacked can be learned from?
Talk about a double standard!
A protest can’t be learned from Yisro or Lot
Lot was saved by malachim because he had a zechus. (Kivan sheNitan reshus…?)
Avraham davened for him, he did not protest, he did not try to educate the people of Sdom. He kept far away.
Even when he told Lot to go right or left, R’ Schwab asks “Why right or left? Why not North or South? He didn’t say North or South cause Sdom was South and Avraham didnt want to go there, nor did he want Lot to go there.
Moshe saved people whom he saw getting attacked. He did not need to. We don’t learn from Moshe that one needs to. This was lfinim mishuras hadin.
But the concept is definitely there, and if gedolim say to protest it then this Chazal seems to be at least a “deyka” or indicator that this is, in fact, correct.
It seems like R’ Miller was really a daas yachid on this. He was a gadol and is entitled to be a daas yachid, but even the R’ Shmuel letter was based upon “R’ Miller says”
January 29, 2013 10:10 pm at 10:10 pm in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927682JayMatt19Participant1. I brought it as a counter proof to what Health had said about “When destruction goes out, it does so indiscriminately” I was asking why that wouldn’t be the case by the Yam. The AZ comment was just to show that the zechusim angle might not work
2. The Midrash on Korach: The people who were neutral in Korach v. Moshe were punished because not because they decided not to get involved, but because they said “If Moshe wins we’ll follow him, If Korach wins we’ll follow him”. They weren’t lazy, they were totally neutral, despite what they had seen until now. Additionally, their protesting would be for Yidden and to Yidden, in a place with only Yidden.
You might feel that a machlokes about who is the leader of klal yisroel with the aforementioned circumstances, can be applied to a goyish government’s laws, I don’t see the connection.
3. As for Oy L’Rasha, that is learned from a Midrash in Toras Kohanim, about wall in between the home of a metzora and a tahor yid, the wall needs to be knocked down, why? what did the other yid do? Oy L’Rasha… (and metzora is only by a yid)
I’m pretty confident, and I checked this with a chaver (doesn’t mean that we are wrong) that the term “shecheino” is not used by a goy.
JayMatt19ParticipantThe newcomers guide and the madrich chareidi both list numerous medicine gmachs
Good luck
January 29, 2013 8:49 pm at 8:49 pm in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927681JayMatt19ParticipantAgreed that the gemarra mentions 3 out of 30 that the goyim still keep. Agreed that it does not say that they survive on this merit.
. It would take a very clear statement from Chazal for me to believe that writing a non-binding, useless kesuba on a same gender union is worse than the maaseh aveira itself.
????? ?????
?????, ??????? ???? ??? ??? ?????? ??? ?????
What is worse, maaseh without kesuba or kesuba without maaseh? I haven’t got a clue
But I think it is silly to believe that once there is kesuba there will be no maaseh.
And maaseh with kesuba is worse than maaseh without kesuba
January 29, 2013 6:22 am at 6:22 am in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927676JayMatt19Participantthere is another factor: ?? ??????? ???? ??? ?? ???? ?????. But as Health anyway said, that occurence was likely particular to the Exodus.
You are right…L’fi The Malbim, Aliba D’Rebbe Yoshea
It wasn’t a Chazal, as previously mentioned. And the Ramban and the Sifsei Chachamim learn the passuk differently.
Thank you Health for taking the time to look it up posting the Torah here
January 29, 2013 5:16 am at 5:16 am in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927675JayMatt19ParticipantMy point was about R’ Brevda. And his shiur, nothing else.
Obviously he can’t take sides in a dispute among Amoraim
January 28, 2013 9:41 pm at 9:41 pm in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927669JayMatt19ParticipantThank You Health
And R’ Yonasson would argue and says the Mashchis did differentiate even in the same house. So this poster Jay can hold like this Shitta.
I once heard a shiur from R’ Brevda zt”l describing makkas bechoros according to this shitta, as only he, R’ Brevda was able to.
Describing what it was like to sit in your own home, being forced to house an Egyptian 1st born in your home with you, since his parents were scared. And during all this you were eating Korban Pesach (his god).
R’ Brevda went on to say how this didn’t save the Egyptian. Seems like he geared his shiur towards the shitta of R’ Yonasson
January 28, 2013 1:41 pm at 1:41 pm in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927642JayMatt19ParticipantThis is why I love the CR (sarcasm)
Firstly, I need to debate Joseph who is using at least 2 or 3 names. Why? L-rd knows
Second of all, A quote was made without quoting it as a chazal. (B’shem Omro meivi geula?)
I’m supposed to automatically know it is a chazal and not someone’s own made up Torah (e.g. The Yona pshat from this topic)
Since I don’t know it is a chazal, I try to debate it with proofs that are proofs, and you acknowledge are proofs, but am accused of rejecting chazal, and being mekatreg my own people.
(I also mentioned earlier regarding oy laRasha which Chazal also have much to talk about. Do you not believe in that Chazal as well, CH”V?)
I believe that Chazal refers to Yidden as “shecheinav”, not Goyim. If you have a source for otherwise, I’d love to educate myself
Do you also enjoy trying to bring a kitrug on what are presumably your people?
No, I like learning pshat. Sorry that you feel saying “Halalu Ovdei Avoda Zara VaHalalu Ovdei Avoda Zara” is speaking bad on your own people. What else from the Torah can I not mention? Meraglim? The Killing of Chur? Participating in the seuda of Achashverosh?
And finally, Where can I locate this Chazal so that I can learn it and understand it?
January 28, 2013 6:48 am at 6:48 am in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927640JayMatt19ParticipantWanted to add this but too late.
So 10 out of the 11 times we see clearly that Klal Yisroel doesn’t get included. As to the 11th, there are plenty of other ways of interpretation.
Please don’t use choshech as a counter proof, they didn’t die because of the makka
January 28, 2013 6:06 am at 6:06 am in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927639JayMatt19ParticipantI did reply. I’ll do it in longer form
There where 10 makkos, by all 10 the Yidden did not suffer. Seems like differentiation to me. Only by the last one did HKBH give them a “task” to do before so that they’d be saved.
Was it because of destruction, as you say, or because HKBH decided that this was a great time to test klal yirsroel, and if they failed they’d be punished for failing, not because of the initial destruction decree?
By the Yam there was no task. We were saved and our enemies died. Yet both groups were idolitors. Shevet Dan was thinking about AZ when they went through, and had their AZ in their pockets as they went through, and were still saved. Hashem differentiated us even when we didn’t.
I’ll be happy to answer, when the proof is brought
January 27, 2013 9:57 pm at 9:57 pm in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927631JayMatt19Participant@benign
Did you look at the gemarra before making that comment?
If yes I’d love to know how you learn pshat
January 27, 2013 9:06 pm at 9:06 pm in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927628JayMatt19ParticipantWhy didn’t they make an announcement in BMG for all to go? As mentioned, there are only 40 people there at the protest? Why? They should have easily been able to get more, all they had to do was ask.
Probably cause they didn’t want to ask and they didn’t want more. And this was about marriage and was about NJ, not EY
You are right I choose to ignore you.
You regularly insult me when I don’t agree with you, and your proofs are thin at best. I don’t argue for the sake of arguing, I made my point and I anticipated the replies that got. I stand by my point.
Cheshbon hanefesh means bettering ones self, looking at ones own behavior and trying to better it. Blaming others is not going to help klal yisorel.
Did you protest the marriage laws in Europe? Are they not part of the world too?
Also, We had to do many things to show hashem we are worthy of becoming his nation. To train ourselves that the fear is in hashem, and that hashem can protect us
“when the angel of destruction goes out” last I checked, we say in the haggada that hashem did that makka himself. Perhaps your hagadda says differently
This will be the final time I reply to you here, or any other post until for the foreseeable future.
You are welcome to have the final word, but like I told another poster, do not read anything into my silence
January 27, 2013 6:44 pm at 6:44 pm in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927625JayMatt19ParticipantIt actually was quite common in various places. Nero married a young male in a very public ceremony. It became outlawed after the spread of Christianity throughout Europe.
January 27, 2013 6:11 pm at 6:11 pm in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927624JayMatt19ParticipantThe previous comment seems to be directed at the “proof” from Yona. I does not seem to have anything to do with toeva.
I also agree, I don’t believe we can make that proof from Yona for the same reason mentioned above, namely, that Yona was commanded by Hkbh to go.
Why did Yona go to Nineveh yet Avraham Avinu didn’t go to sdom?
Yona was told to go, Avraham wasn’t, so he didn’t
January 26, 2013 6:56 pm at 6:56 pm in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927618JayMatt19ParticipantA question was asked of me by “Naysberg” (probably Joseph) and I will respond. This will probably be my last response on this topic. I made my point, and I stand my this initial point (that we should look how to better ourselves when tragedy strikes vs. blaming others). The current nature of this conversation, whilst interesting, is far enough away from my initial point that I will choose to step away.
JayMatt: How do you feel about the aforementioned actions of Rav Miller, Rav Kaminetzky, Rav Cohen, et al?
1. Don’t ask me how I feel about the actions of gedolei yisroel.
I have no right to “feel” anything about their actions.
2. I’ll answer the following question “Having heard the actions of the above 3 gedolim, do you still stand by your position”.
Yes
There are a number of reasons why people protest:
A: Because they believe the protest will inspire change
B: They dont believe it will inspire change, but they feel they shouldn’t be silent on the matter, lest people believe they agree
C: They dont feel it will inspire change, but by protesting you are reminding yourself where you stand on the issue.(Mussar for one’s self)
Let me tell you something, the reason for the protest wasn’t “Option A”. Why were there only 40 people with him? Why not make an announcement in BMG and get everyone to go?
When there was a parade in Yerushalayim, there were many protests leading up to the parade. Friends of mine went to R’ Shturnbuch to ask about it. He replied “You’ll notice, I only signed the notice for 1 protest”. He was holding either options B or C. He told they guys to go to that one protest, and not leave yeshiva for any others.
I’ve been in Eretz Yisroel for about 13 years, I only remember once where R’ Eliyashiv zt”l said to go and protest, and that was in regards to the situation in Emanuel, where they were going to imprison the parents of school children when the school denied entry to some students. Never once did he say to protest anything “mishkav zochur” related
So if R’ Cohen and the other Rabbonim only got 40 people, and R’ Shternbuch said to only go to 1 protest, seems to me that the protests were supposed to accomplish something else.
Additionally, from what I can recall, there WERE Gedolim who said to vote for a “pro-toeva” candidate in an election not too long ago. Apparently, they decided a decision on whom to vote for was not as simple as “Just pick the Anti-Toeva one”
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/article.php?p=41515
And getting back to the initial point, why would we be punished to harshly with a hurricane for not doing enough? Seems like those who say to protest, do so in a very limited way.
January 26, 2013 6:46 pm at 6:46 pm in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927617JayMatt19ParticipantHakatan said
But even for our own sake, we don’t want our host country to be sedom.
So why not move to a place where such unions are not recognized?
There are states where amendments have been passed outlawing it
Why should a yid live in a place he fears is turning into Sodom? Why is it better to protest? Don’t waste your time protesting, leave before the hashkafas get worse. Leave now so you dont need to be surrounded by the tumah any more than you have to
January 25, 2013 11:49 am at 11:49 am in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927609JayMatt19ParticipantHaKatan
The gemarra in chullin says that the goyim have 30 mitzvos, 3 of which they still keep.
Seemingly all 30 are zechusim, it is just that gem area stated that they stopped doing 27 of them, but should they resume keeping it, sounds like it would still be a zechus.
And murder is certainly one of the mitzvos the bnei noach took upon themselves
January 24, 2013 11:03 pm at 11:03 pm in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927602JayMatt19Participantthere are exceptions, such as during WW II, when Rabbanim did march to Washington. For something as terrible as mishkav zachar, I’m not so sure the quiet approach is the correct one.
They protested the killing of yidden in Germany and the US doing nothing about it.
Please dont use this to make a binyan av. The cases are not comparable.
Do Rabbonim advocate going to protest abortion laws? partial birth abortions? Were yidden supposed to go protest the treatment and laws regarding the case of Terri Schiavo?
Also, still awaiting your proof that we should educate the goyim about their zechusim. I know what the gemarra says, it says these are their zechusim, doesnt say we need to ensure they keep them
JayMatt, Regarding, my point 1, I apologize for omitting the other two. But the point still remains.
Your point doesn’t remain. Your original point was that they’d have NO zechusim left.
Last I checked you can’t by cuts of human flesh for the 4th of July BBQ
January 24, 2013 9:23 pm at 9:23 pm in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927599JayMatt19ParticipantI ignored it cause my logic doesn’t demand that.
Your illogical conclusions lead you to inject some twisted logic into my words.
I spoke about protesting how goyim should behave and about when to and not to protest. Not about avoiding government jobs, not about having a preferred candidate. Not about having opinions
Oh, and even though I didn’t imply that, I’m actually quite confident that a search of the forum will show no posts siding towards a particular candidate or party, I try to avoid those topics.
January 24, 2013 5:16 pm at 5:16 pm in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927596JayMatt19ParticipantIn fact, your enumerated position should indicate your opposition to frum candidates running for any political office. That is more prominent and frequent than this… where have you voiced opposition to all that?
Your logic is highly illogical
I have not stated that one should avoid government. If one can get a job in gov’t, why not? Let him or her get a nice paying job where he or she can (hopefully) do things to try to make things better for their frum constituents.
What makes you think I hold otherwise?
That is more prominent and frequent than this… where have you voiced opposition to all that?
I often keep my opposition to things to myself. I posted this rant cause I believed there was a toeles in it.
Please don’t read into my silence on other matters (and ask others before you choose to read into their silence)
January 24, 2013 1:05 pm at 1:05 pm in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927594JayMatt19ParticipantAn issue affecting yidden directly, eg bris, shchita etc one can and should.otherwise no
Talking on a commity level here, don’t say that I’ve forbidden every yid every time
JayMatt19ParticipantSad,
Nowadays, nobody can tell the difference between who is and who isn’t a gadol
January 24, 2013 8:08 am at 8:08 am in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927592JayMatt19ParticipantHaKatan Said:
2. The gemara clearly states that the only zechus the Gentiles have is that they don’t write a kesuba bein ish liIsh. Absent that…?
WRONG! WRONG!! WRONG!!!
Sure it is easier to argue when you make up the facts, but that isnt what the gemarra says. (dont believe me? have a look yourself. Chullun 92a-92b)
Ulla says it is the 30 mitzvos the goyim accepted upon themselves, and the only 3 that they still keep
1. Not writing “a shtar” for same gender unions, as you’ve mentioned
2. Not publicly selling Human flesh for consumption (Rashi: even though they eat it in private, they dont sell it in public)
3. Give Kavod to the Torah (this is probably a discussion in its own right)
1. We were not punished for what the gentiles did. But I’m not sure (I don’t know) we “did everything we could” either.
3. There is a concept of Oy LaRasha Oy Lishcheino, which means that if an innocent person associates with a wicked one then the innocent person may end up caught up, CH”V, in the punishment of that wicked person.
You seem to be contradicting yourself here, 1st you say a yid wont get punished for the goy’s actions,then you define “Oy l’rasha…” as meaning: “which means that if an innocent person associates with a wicked one then the innocent person may end up caught up, CH”V, in the punishment of that wicked person.”
So does he or doesn’t he? and where does it say that “association” is punishable? All I have to do is have such a waiter serve me at a restaurant and I can get punished? cmon
But the main point of your post which I’d like to discuss is where you say “maybe we could have done more”?
Firstly, where is there a mitzva to try to convince the goyish government to make their laws in line with our laws? Where is it stated that there is a Mitzva to do anything?
Secondly what should we have done exactly?
Given tzeddaka to the anti-toeva campaign, leaving less for yeshivas, mosdos and chessed organizations?
Taken our elementary, high school and beis medrash students away from their learning to protest?
That sound very anti-torah thinking to me. To suggest that it is in our best interest to take away from our Torah to try to suggest to goyim how to behave.
Point to note, I’d find it very interesting, should you actually suggest that we should take away the funds and time from learning, as you’ve been posting in the forum about the Israeli Army that one shouldn’t leave the Beis Midrash, since the Torah provides the protection (harei zeh mikra kotzer)
January 22, 2013 2:06 pm at 2:06 pm in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927576JayMatt19ParticipantTlky
What did I ask and what did you answer?
January 22, 2013 11:42 am at 11:42 am in reply to: Parshas HaMan – Tuesday of Parshas Beshalach #1055750JayMatt19ParticipantBUMP!
January 22, 2013 10:02 am at 10:02 am in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927574JayMatt19Participant1) One of the things that provide a “Zchus Kiyum” for the Umos HaOlam is the lack of recognition of same gender relations.
2) Rashi explains that this Gemorah is stating that this is even though in private they engaged in such actions.
…
To state that feeling that there may be a connection between the recognition of same gender marriage and the destruction that took place afterwards is not the way of the Torah is a feeling that is not in line with Chazal’s understanding of the Torah since again a Gemorah was qouted and explained where just that is done.
@Ben Levi
1st of all, in that Gemarra you quote, R’ Yehuda is arguing on Ulla (the opinion you quote).
Secondly, according to Ulla, who says the yidden get punished due to the actions of the goyim?
How many yidden lost their homes?
How many yidden lost their lives? (at least 2 that I know if during Irene)
How many yeshivas suffered major damage?
How many hours and days of limud torah were lost?
How many kollel yungerleit in Lakewood had flooding and no power for days if not over a week?
How many TONS of seforim became shaymus because of damage from the hurricane?
Because Goyim decided to recognize these unions the yidden got punished?
Yidden dont get punished due to the actions of the goyim.
January 20, 2013 10:10 pm at 10:10 pm in reply to: Blaming the Same Gender Unions: A Personal Rant #927543JayMatt19Participant@The Litvishe Kiryas Yoelite – Wasn’t talking about gedolim, was talking about posters on frum sites, and the “Rabbi”no one ever heard of before who came out and blamed Sandy on the “toeva crowd”.
You will note that the real gedolim blamed things which are within our power to control
@akuperma – I dealt with your point in my 1st attempt my issue. Yes it was legal and around. But by the gov’t giving it legitimacy it makes it more ok in people’s eyes
@Healrh “So this isn’t just about how bad Goyim are and we are perfect, like you claim, which none of us ever said, but the fact that Frum Jews have Not been vocal enough against these people and have Not voted against these politicians who vote the Toeivah agenda, is what bothers me and many others! “
This was directly addressed in my 3rd attempt. Who should we be vocal to? The goyim? It is the job of a yid to educate a goy? Since when? It has always been our duty to separate ourselves form them and their mores, and for good reason. Additionally, there is no way you can claim statistically that if every frum jew voted against, then the STATE ELECTION would have turned out differently.
Please provide me with a proof of such a chiuv to go out and educate the goyim. Also please provide a proof that a yid can get punished due to the actions of a goy.
I dont believe that either exist
JayMatt19ParticipantJayMatt19ParticipantPapaya is a 3 year plant, so if planted in teves we could enjoy it’s fruits post orla, were it to be deemed a fruit. The banana is a two year plant, and in no way could we ever eat it if it had a din of orla.
JayMatt19ParticipantThe tree lasts for only 2 years. If it were a fruit, it would be subject to the laws of Orla, meaning its fruits could not be eaten for the 1st 3 years (i.e. could never be eaten)
JayMatt19ParticipantOfficial welcome to the latest screenname of Joseph…AVHABEN
JayMatt19ParticipantDidn’t take too long for shmendrick to reappear .
Troll
January 9, 2013 12:10 pm at 12:10 pm in reply to: Shoshana – who was first named Shoshana? Any famous people named Shoahana? #918993JayMatt19Participant????? ?? ?????
Wife of ?????
Around the time Levi was niftar
As seen in the Seder HaDoros
JayMatt19ParticipantThis is a dvar torah I wrote a number of years ago. I’ll post it here and now, due to its connection to the discussion at hand (It was originally written for Parshas Ki Teitzei):
One of the exciting aspects of having a child is choosing a name. Interestingly, customs regarding names vary between different sects of Jews. An obvious distinction exists between Ashkanazi and Sefardi families. Ashkanazim traditionally name their children after people who have passed on. It is considered an honor to the deceased to have a descendant named after them. Sefardim, however, name their children after a living person. To name a son after a living grandfather is considered a great honor among Sefardim, and yet, is a tremendous insult in an Ashkanazi family.
A contradiction seems to appear in the writings of Rebbi Yehuda HaChasid. In one place he explains that superstition only has power if you give it power. Immediately following that comment, he writes that a longstanding custom exists among the gentiles to name a son after the father with which there is nothing wrong. However, Jews should be careful not to do so (seemingly regardless of whether or not one is superstitious). The commentators explain that really there is no contradiction. Rebbi Yehuda HaChasid is saying that if you do not believe there will be an Ayin Hara, an evil eye, then name your child after whomever you want. However, do not name your child after yourself, because your lack of belief in the superstition will not afford you protection.
December 30, 2012 10:07 pm at 10:07 pm in reply to: When & why did we start giving children more than one name? #916333JayMatt19ParticipantCorrect, the Node b’Yehuda writes against the practice of giving 2 names.
The Sdei Chemed disagees
Correct the Chazon Ish disapproved of the practice of giving 2 names, R’ Eliyashiv zt”l disagreed
The Chazon Ish did even suggest that if naming after someone who wasnt Shomer Shabbos, one SHOULD add a name. But one shouldnt name after 2 people.
Two names also are a segula for Kiyum Habanim, Arichus Yamim, and Chaim Aruchim, moreso than one name.
All the above was taken straight from the sefer “V’yekarei Shmo B’Yisroel” Starting with Daf Ayin Tes (the chapter about two names)
From all this, HALOCHA L’MA’ASEH – one should REFRAIN from giving two names unless it is necessary!!!
Sorry, there are plenty of Gedolim who hold that there is no issue, some even think it is a positive. Please view all sides, don’t see part of the story and decide to pasken improper “HALOCHA L’MA’ASEH”
JayMatt19ParticipantIt is a clear sign that people are given off from work and that the high schools cant get the english teachers to come in on their own holiday.
anything more than that, the signs start getting fuzzy
December 20, 2012 7:46 am at 7:46 am in reply to: a place in tanach where a woman influences her husband for the bad or good? #914461JayMatt19Participant1. The wife of Korach
2. The wife of On Ben Peles
3. Izevel
4. Haman’s wife Zeresh
5. Esther Hamalka (She was Achashverosh’s wife)
JayMatt19ParticipantHow long ago was this? Can you speak with your credit card company about disputing the charge, as the machine is not functioning?
JayMatt19ParticipantBig difference if owned and run by goyim vs. owned by yidden
JayMatt19Participant@Health, you are missing my point.
1st of all, as I said in my into, I am not going to discuss Levin, so I will not. My post was solely based upon Joseph’s comment that Hurricane is directly Yad Hashem and that the cruel animal in CT had bechira, so that somehow limits the ability for it to have been a gezaira from Hashem, thus preventing it from being for a certain reason (note, I am arguing the Torah here, not the individual events and not their causes)
Your logic is faulty.
Thanks for toning it down and not calling mt a lying antisemite
What is bothering you?
The fact that Joseph is claiming that one CAN say a hurricane is cause of toeva and that the shooting can’t be cause of bechira.
Bechira is my focus, not the hurricane, not the same gender unions, not even Levin.
After Nesana Tokef was ask Mi b’Cherev, Mi b’Mayim (who will die via sword, who will die via water). We say that Hashem does both. Yet the water is “directly from Hashem” and the sword was in someone’s hand! Nevertheless, they were both a gezeira from Hashem, no mention of bechira.
(and yes, we also say mi b’kizo mi lo b’kitzo, who in their proper time, who not in their proper time, I agree that people die not in their proper time, how can I not?)
JayMatt19Participant@Joseph, @HaKatan, @Ben Levi (note, I believe I’m adressing the same person)
For sake of this forum, lets agree to disagree on Levin. Each of our positions have been debated both in public and via email. and I do not want to hijack the thread into a debate about that man,
I would like to take you to town on your following statement
Also, the two incidents are not comparable.
In CT, an individual with his own free-will acted as he did, with the terrible results that followed.
In Sandy, on the other hand, Hashem, using His “forces of nature”, orchestrated a powerful show of destruction that caused billions of dollars in damage without any weapons.
So to try to understand CT, one has to first understand the parameters of bechira.
I dont understand your point. Are you saying that the people harmed by the hurricane were harmed by G-d and the people harmed by man weren’t harmed by G-d?
How does bechira factor into this?
Yes, He had the bechira to choose to TRY to do this horrible crime, but he, like everyone else, needed siyata d’shmaya, did he not?
Would you say the same thing about bechira had it been an arab extremist in a school in Israel? Do you say the same thing about Leiby Kletzky?
-
AuthorPosts