It is Time for Truth

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 151 through 200 (of 1,052 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • zdad
    “Sephardic Sefer, as is the Tur and the Rosh” incorrect on both accounts

    When the Rosh fled to Spain he influenced one of the most distinguished communities of Spain, Toledo,
    of the superiority of mesoras Ashkenaz. There are more than a few other examples. Why is there nary an example the other way?
    (excepting the Romaniotes of the Balkans who switched from being under the sway of Franco-German Jewry to the newly Sephardic arrivals though that was due to sociopolitical as much as any else)

    in reply to: Is Yiddish Holy? #1737306

    TC[sic]

    As you travel through all 2700+ blatt Gemara, do we in 2019 follow everything stated in Shas?

    We do .
    Are you implying except insofar when the leading commentaries explicitly tell us otherwise, that we don’t?!

    Yabia,

    For some of those cases,the short uncomfortable long term answer is
    no
    Pious men could be found in every nook and cranny
    In some cases they are the exceptions to prove the rule

    Nor should it matter. the discussion is not sectoral influence in a vacuum
    It is predominance

    Neville,
    should have been rather obvious Yabia was coming From a YU corner, under a falutin Sephardic guise .
    Nom de plume notwithstanding

    The Chida noted in his travels that Tunisia of the latter 18th century was influenced by and adopted Ashkenazi methodology

    it is Not a new phenomenon

    Yabia,
    Go ahead . deny it. sil vouz plait

    Even in the Best of communities eg Aleppo There were very few heavyweights
    While they were many pious Remaining they were not Sadly capable of dealing with the changing conditions
    It was With reason that in the 60s Sephardic Jews Were unfortunately being compared to the 10 lost tribes

    yussel,
    they worship men of the spirit
    Not so much tangible materialism like some of your Hellenists

    worship should have quotations

    typo

    Yabia Omer,
    False but ignorant
    start with one

    When they were being Maspid Rabbeinu Yitzchak Elchanan at his Levaya 1896, They mourned
    him as the Rashkabaha”g
    When the Darshan was asked [Translated] How come he wouldn’t call him gadol hador?
    response was “Because Reb Yehoshua Leib is alive [in Yerushalayim]”!

    in reply to: Percentage of men members vs. women on YW Coffeeroom? #1736340

    ” The funny thing is, that both mainstream datiim and mainstream secularites have as their common-denominator that most don’t seem all that interested in what a healed-world might be like.”
    funny??

    RY23,” gender is not real.”
    nothing is real.
    Tomorrow a centaur,while yesterday you were an amoeba

    go get some heady stuff in a back alley

    in reply to: Is Arabic Holy? #1735605

    Joseph,
    Depends.
    Possibly Ladino of the Me’am Loez

    in reply to: Is Yiddish Holy? #1735571

    A present day [ half] maskil:
    Although I’m a Sephardi, I love Yiddish! It’s a soul language that basically defies all principles of what an official language should be. It’s musical and can convey feelings no other language can. I remember that the Roshei Yeshiva called me Lapes Cardeizei, because Lithuanian Jews can’t pronounce

    in reply to: Is Yiddish Holy? #1735505

    the Maharil Diskin refused to speak to a certain Talmid Chacham of Jerusalem because he used to spek only Loshon HaKodesh. Said the Maharil Diskin, “For generations our custom speaking Yiddish, not Loshon HaKodesh.”

    in reply to: Understanding Lag Baomer #1732465

    Where is Kever Rashbi located ?

    According to R. Menachem Hachevroni (14th century) in Kfar Chananya
    (15 km. south of Meron)

    2) When was Rashbi niftar ?

    According to the Chida there is no Mekor that he was niftar on Lag Baomer

    3) Who wrote the Zohar ?

    According to the Yavetz it was R. Moishe d’Leon

    4) How can you bring nachas to Rashbi (guaranteed) ?

    The Shoel Umeishiv ( 5 – 39) writes ” if you distribute the money to Aniyei Eretz Yisroel
    instead of spending it to go to his Kever etc., he guarantees Rashbi will have much more Nachas Ruach.

    in reply to: Understanding Lag Baomer #1732467

    Lag B’Omer [ Has gone so overboard & taken so overboard one can conjecture it] borders on Bal Tosif

    in reply to: Understanding Lag Baomer #1732466

    a teshuvah (responsum) of Rav Shmuel Wosner z”l, stemming from a תוספתא that states המרקד לשלהבת הרי זה מדרכי אמורי.
    the full teshuvah of Rav Wosner (שו”ת שבט הלוי, חלק ז, יורה דעה סימן קלו

    in reply to: Women’s Suffrage Must End #1732370

    Start with the Vengeful Khaki election of 1918 In Britain
    The red scares, isolationism In the US All Were disproportionately female driven

    The collapse of the high and open-minded British Liberal Party through the twenties Being for the most part permanently replaced by the collectivist Socialist Labour
    The Head in the sand Disastrous atmosphere progression Riding emotional vacillations that was a 1920s and 30s

    In the nascent Egalitarian Soviet Union The overwhelming majority of those sent to the gulag or executed were male .the vast majority the system of informers Trusted and Used by the Bolsheviks Soviet regime were female

    Male & females voted roughly in equal ratio proportion for The Nazi party, even though the Nazi Party did
    not allow women to serve As Representatives In the Reichstag
    However women’s support for the Nazis Seemed to increase disproportionately in the years after voting ceased . And would become arguably its most fanatical supporters

    But you Luna can contend that females Needed politically a learning curve.
    males were given the suffrage for Different branches and levels over generations ,receiving in 1913 Finally In the US for the Senate

    For the the British Isles the last Men received franchise 1918 the same moment that females 30 Or married Received it [ The remaining Gained the franchise in 1928 ]

    Acknowledge at minimum that the suffragettes were too hasty
    It should Have been done over the decades piecemeal

    Women Of 1950s subtly recognized and accepted Most or all of the above Belatedly
    Which was cause of Them becoming more ‘housewifery’

    They would be maligned For this by the next generation of females just a decade or two later

    in reply to: Women’s Suffrage Must End #1732126

    Though It’ll take a little bit of time because men have the devolved since women got suffrage and therefore will need time to recover
    Once men have somewhere Of Power That women can’t enter everyone Honest knows what will happen
    [ hey maybe even top hats will have a comeback]

    Luna,
    enjoy your feministic pipe dream
    I’m willing to bet my bottom dollar even you know otherwise
    What will happen afterwards is that women being embarrassed not treated as seriously will start Looking over their shoulders & In their legislature start carefully to operate seriously -even more than the men.
    thus the nature of females
    [ So it was In Victorian days before suffrage]

    Then the Media, the left, enough men with selfish low self-interested agendae, start pumping
    Drumroll..
    that look women are just as serious men they should be allowed into the male legislature .
    Since ,most men Contrary to feminist tripe, don’t wish to eternally fight females ..probably just cave in
    then the cycle downwards will continue

    in reply to: Women’s Suffrage Must End #1731955

    A hypothetical-
    Have the same branches of government system as The US has with “equal” rights of representation for both genders
    One exception
    For the bicameral legislature 1 House have male only suffrage and 1 House would have women only
    Which section of the government would become the serious For the whole country would turn towards
    And which section would comparatively be perceived by both genders as less serious
    ’nuff said??

    Venture to give a guess how the system will quickly Evolve?

    in reply to: Women’s Suffrage Must End #1731949

    Luna,

    Frost and foam to your heart’s content
    the Majority of authorities based on Devorim 17:15 The verse from whence political power is derived from [including Democratic ] conclude women are Emphatically Not intended to be included
    the fact that we accept it In the present circumstances It is not ideal
    And no one for whom the Sages are their Guiding lodestar can say otherwise

    most authorities based on 1715 1715 political power is derived from including Democratic
    women are not included by the way this this comes out to for example if If you deny that then many example the state right to Democrat democratically-elected like to tax or law of the land and a flexible either and it comes up that’s just a reality eventually gets which part of the government would become the serious one quickly only one house for women well everything else Remains the Same the same as present

    in reply to: Women’s Suffrage Must End #1729806

    Phil, et al
    Difference between in theory and practical necessity would be expected, correct?

    in reply to: Women’s Suffrage Must End #1729805

    R yaakov Weinberg is on record having stated more than once
    feminism & subsequent offshoots [transgenderism,etc.] is a greater challenge & danger more than
    any other travail that we faced over three millennia!

    in reply to: Women’s Suffrage Must End #1729801

    Hard to deny that once woman got the suffrage virtually immediately clothing start getting immodest ; skirt length start getting shorter, Etc

    a further point,
    very first president elected promptly after women got suffrage was & is considered to this
    today arguably the worst ever :Warren Harding
    who was elected disproportionately by women
    There was similar trajectory in other countries as well

    in reply to: Chabad hate on YWN? #1727864

    Joseph,

    It may have been largely the case in the end of the 70s ( tape 271)
    could that however be said to be the case today?!
    younger people are mostly on the conveyor belt way they were raised And indoctrinated

    in reply to: The War Against White Men #1727859

    lower & middle class males are suffering
    black men are suffering as much as anybody

    RebbY23,
    Cherrypick this post

    in reply to: Do women need to stay up all night of Shavuos? #1727429

    RebbG,etc.

    Go for it.But not ad hoc. Make it as official as the men
    have the first night for the men
    second night for the women

    in reply to: The War Against White Men #1726423

    it’s demeaning to refer to women as women
    Surely we are woke enough to recognize that the word “woman” or “women” carries with it centuries and centuries of cruel, misogynistic stereotyping. Even the very existence of the word, ‘woman’ implies that women are somehow different from (not as good as!?) men, otherwise they’d be named ‘men’.

    Since we know men and women (pardon the phrase) are absolutely, in all ways equal. Since we know — per the new ‘wokeness’ attached to transphilia, that men and women can both have babies. Since we know that any outcome differences seen between men & women are due entirely to bias and prejudice… Wouldn’t it make sense to just remove the word ‘women’ (and all its derivatives) from the language.

    AND — since, historically, men have been the privileged ones…the one’s selected to fight & die in endless wars, undertake high-mortality professions

    in reply to: Chabad hate on YWN? #1725973

    empathize typo

    in reply to: Chabad hate on YWN? #1725969

    RebbetzinG, etc.
    We do emphasize .
    it is painful to reassess how You & yours have been indoctrinated .Cognitive dissonance

    in reply to: The War Against White Men #1725961

    Moishgil,rebbetzinG

    Cute silly but a farce
    any study would prove to you that
    is precisely the ones with privilege who( minus a few exceptions) are not the ones suffering
    Those ones will always be sitting pretty and the females will allow them . don’t believe the glass ceiling hype

    It’s the ones who don’t have the privilege are suffering and even life expectancy is going down

    in reply to: The War Against White Men #1725749

    RY23,etc.
    White men it wasn’t.

    when only white men had the suffrage, things were worse?

    in reply to: The War Against White Men #1725747

    Fwd To the recent present

    John McCain Was stunned his friend Joe Lieberman pushed (with Jewish Senator Carl Levin )
    pushed the overturning of “don’t ask don’t tell” which accelerated the slide in America

    what were the first two states publicly change classic marriage?

    Jewish influenced New York in legislature
    Maryland through referendum
    The few others Only a handful prior were from
    the Bench

    in reply to: Why is Kiruv Rechokim becoming much more challenging? #1725585

    smerel,
    (3) is patently not correct

    in reply to: The War Against White Men #1725038

    Every race has its own unique Positive proclivities And should be appreciated for them
    Any less would be an unhappy monolithic colorless planet
    Furthermore No race’s blood is redder than any others and nobody is allowed to Lynch anyone else
    And Ultimately
    וידע כל פעול כי אתה פעלתו

    Having settled thus
    Hasn’t the white race Based on whatever heritage generally been politically superior to others and more Suited to positions of strategic Authority Provided is used for the betterment of all And not abused?

    in reply to: Chassidim vs. Beis Yaakov #1724056

    Joseph,
    observe how the Commentaries over the centuries interpreted

    1) Women are prohibited from learning she’lo lishma
    2) females ought not to learn pilpul or too much lomdus
    3) Females are not to learn in an organized institutional setting

    The Saba Kadisha always contended that his rebbe was his mother and her main rebbe in turn was ..her mother

    in reply to: The War Against White Men #1723672

    only White?
    divide et impera

    All decent men

    in reply to: Difference between Chabad and everyone else? #1722757

    non,
    It happens to be a matter of record for all those who knew them even somewhat intimately

    Berger’s book while a good read
    was intended to be an indictment of the yeshivish World
    it boomeranged paradoxically and was more an indictment of His own modern Orthodox world
    he himself conceded as much at least in part

    in reply to: Difference between Chabad and everyone else? #1722700

    RebbetzinG,
    “would not have accorded exteme kovod to their Rebbe”

    How is it you so assuredly presume they did?

    while There were some who did their closest respected Colleagues perceived it as naivete on their Part
    Second
    For the epoch for the second half of the 20th century
    religious world twas a desperate tough time
    it was a matter of accepting whatever you can get then

    in reply to: Chabad hate on YWN? #1722518

    Psalm 97:10

    in reply to: Chassidim vs. Beis Yaakov #1722506

    Joseph,
    There always were girls who learned
    The Innovation if there was, was as an official institution
    As someone who was involved in a superior bais yaakov High School in North America for
    some years previously ,one even presently can honestly weigh and debate whether girls being educated in institutions Is better than other options at least in theory

    One fact that’s rarely considered in the Perennial discussions was that females had just gotten suffrage .
    There therefore desperate need for them to be educated

    iirc Frankfurt Had girls education institutionalized since 1853

    in reply to: Difference between Chabad and everyone else? #1721777

    RebbG,

    To clue you in, since you keep harping on the same subject.
    is that the only thing they didn’t follow Chofetz CHaim on?
    He was against eating before blowing the shofar
    He held they should wear long rather than shorter jacket

    He told his grandsons reportedly that they should grow tchupps in front since with their beards and longer jackets shouldn’t come to be confused for chassidim!

    in reply to: Chassidim vs. Beis Yaakov #1721783

    Redleg
    Too much propaganda?
    putting aside Hungary or Galicia almost all supported the movement
    matter of fact it was so obvious that most weren’t even sure what the Innovation was

    Germany and Yavne already had existing before this

    in reply to: The Shach #1708014

    Rav Hutner response upon being asked how Chabad is so successful in propaganda
    “because they were last ones left in Russia together with the Bolsheviks”

    And This was over 40 years ago

    Compare with The mirth he would have had from Dalfin’s Publications

    in reply to: The Shach #1706338

    RebbetzinG,

    while it is painful and tough to discover you’ve been taught till now to be incorrect
    that’s part of growing up

    R’ zusha When challenged admitted he did not know yerushalmi
    Reb Levi Yitzchok of berditchev who was a scholar of note was still handily defeated in the Pinsk debate of 1784

    But if revisionism suits you And yours better ,Be Our Guest .

    in reply to: The Shach #1706174

    RebbetzinG,
    Just in case you didn’t catch , Neville was being facetious when he called it a minhag
    Second
    this is the best defense you could offer?
    How about hmm..Lev Tahor
    According to you they are as entitled to what they perceive as their minhag!

    in reply to: The Shach #1706091

    RebbetzinG,,
    must I disabuse you of your background education

    firstly a primary role in the whole Hasidic movement was to break rigid hierarchy
    they were opposed to the pyramid of titles
    was supposed to be a common Brotherhood
    cf. comrade after the Russian Revolution
    Second it is of course impolitic to say thus And heresy for ears like yours but many of them while righteous
    were not Scholars of the first rank

    in reply to: intellectual thread #1703022

    Haleivi,
    Can happiness. be other than ephemeral

    in reply to: Halachically okay to be liberal? #1701979

    Moral system Builds steadily National Character

    One Example
    A century previous when America was a relatively morally rigid country
    Height For Men with 3rd highest and women fourth-highest in the world
    A century later No longer even the upper 40 for males and barely hit forty For females

    ‘There was a time when most American children were expected to outgrow their parents.
    Since data on Americans’ average height was first collected in the early 20th century, children and adolescents grew about an inch and a half taller every 20 years. But recent measurements suggest Americans’ average height has more or less hit the ceiling.
    Data collected from the federal Centers for Disease Control show that average height for Americans has stabilized in the past 50 years to about 5 feet 9 inches for men and 5 feet 4 inches for women.
    “We’ve pretty well maxed out in terms of stature. There’s been little change in adult height over last generation,” says William Leonard, an anthropologist at Northwestern’

    “A 2016 study showed that Iranian men have seen the biggest change in height over the last century, gaining about 6.7 inches (17 centimeters)”.

    Further example
    Once Upon..

    on the battlefield
    the German was convinced that their moral probity make them perform better than the relatively looser French . and they were proven absolutely accurate

    Being overly Jewish Centric we have our own compass therefore were not as affected
    & usually miss these
    It is the height of crude ruthless ungraciousness To the host country to uncaringly ignore these

    To Paraphrase the famous quote:
    Men build laws and institutions Then Institution and laws build men

    in reply to: Joining Litvishe #1700919

    RebbetzinG,

    No need to defend R’ Yaakov
    Shulchan Aruch was never the be all and end all for old Litvishe Rabbanim.
    cf. Bach intro.
    Since when has it been
    the be all and end all for Chabad?! irony

    He is content with your intestinal perturbations

    in reply to: Halachically okay to be liberal? #1699926

    “as a society we are better off if we all don’t steal and kill.”
    Propaganda
    Who said so
    Who defines what the terms should mean anyway
    Guaranteed You steal possibly even kill According some esoteric definition

    ‘Tis Literally What the powerbrokers under the guise of democracy Find convenient And can easily brainwash at a given moment

    in reply to: Halachically okay to be liberal? #1699716

    It is A OK Halachically to be liberal for this one & laudable also

    “Sanders: U.S. Must Ban Assault Weapons Like New Zealand
    March 22, 2019

    in reply to: Halachically okay to be liberal? #1699328

    ” I don’t think any significant portion of the goyish world views that issue the same way we do.”
    That’s because we have been sleepwalking
    4 + 1/2 years ago there was had a hearing in Trenton regarding end-of-life .
    presumably based on the polls and what not

    they played up the claim of that the public was on the other side
    According to reports
    among those who showed up it was 9 to 1 non-jews ! against pulling the plug
    Have things changed since then? Probably .and whose fault is it ?

    ” that liberal Jews would say that after Rowe V Wade, there is no point in arguing about abortion in the political sense”

    Well if there’s no absolutes and It always just relative well then you might be correct
    some of the plaints against Republicans in the 1950s were They were the original ” me too”
    In other words they held the same just as moderate Democrats, just perhaps little less hasty

Viewing 50 posts - 151 through 200 (of 1,052 total)