illini07

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 151 through 200 (of 215 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: America, Democrats, and Jewish Values #622960
    illini07
    Member

    I can only try:

    “Freedom of religion is the freedom to practice your religion, or lack thereof, without government interference.

    Freedom from religion, if enforced, is communism.”

    That’s a pretty succinct, well-worded explanation.

    in reply to: America, Democrats, and Jewish Values #622958
    illini07
    Member

    Mariner:

    1) There is considerable debate between the view of “freedom of religion” and “freedom from religion”; it is not as clear-cut as you would like to think. Regardless, even if it is “of religion,” the problem then becomes who decides what is a “religion”? Religious beliefs vary widely, even within religions. Practically speaking, freedom of religion becomes freedom from religion in certain circumstances, because we don’t want to get mired in the sticky question of what is a religion.

    2) The bill of rights has been incorporated to the states through the 14th Amendment. Whether you agree with it or not, the courts treat it as such today, under the doctrine of stare decisis. There is also considerable debate over the true meaning of the 10th Amendment.

    in reply to: Barack Obama #624011
    illini07
    Member

    Joseph:

    Thanks for the heads-up, I’ll definitely check it out. My initial thought however, is that the implications of insurance coverage as pertains to a Jewish-owned business is not equivalent to requiring a religion or religious institution to recognize the unions.

    in reply to: Why not Obama? #715120
    illini07
    Member

    Joseph, you are correct. I just think that the soaring rhetoric about Palin from people who decried such rhetoric about Obama is humorous.

    veimloachshuv: Yes, he was a POW, however I fail to see how that in and of itself makes someone more fit to be president. It has nothing to do with the President’s job. That’s not to say he shouldn’t get any credit for it, but it’s kind of irrelevant to the debate.

    in reply to: Barack Obama #624008
    illini07
    Member

    Joseph: I have always been a state’s right-ist. I believe strongly in a federal system, where states have wide latitude to adopt social policies. If it fails, one state is harmed and only one state. If it succeeds, others are free to follow suit. It’s what Brandeis called the “laboratory system” of federalism in his dissent in the New State Ice Co. case.

    And I’m not aware of any civil unions act that requires any religious institution to recognize such a partnership. That would strike me as patently unconstitutional. If I’m incorrect, I’d greatly appreciate a reference so I can check it out for myself!

    Mariner:

    In the definitional sense, my inference was absolutely correct. You can’t go and re-define the meaning of the word “record” to fit your argument. You can’t complain he didn’t vote for something when there has not been a vote. As I said, and as most political commentators have recognized, neither candidate will sway from the status quo on support for Israel. It would be FAR too politically costly – it would cost the Republicans their growing frum base, and the Democrats their support from all of the non-frum Jews who still consider Israel an important part of their identity.

    As to your final paragraph, then you probably shouldn’t care if blacks have health insurance either, as they have higher HIV infection rates. Furthermore, perhaps Jews should not get health insurance due to their numerous predominantly Jewish diseases. Additionally, your “slippery slope” argument is fallacious at best: a main point of civil marriage is to clearly define and establish legal responsibilities, which animals cannot have. Animals do not have legal standing in this way, and furthermore cannot consent. It is absolutely preposterous to claim that bestiality is the inevitable result of civil unions. It’s the same thing as saying, “well, we gave women the right to vote, so clearly we must give it to toddlers as well.” Hogwash.

    Since you were so kind to point out the previous DSM classifications, also remember, that in the not-too-distant past, it was also illegal for blacks and whites to intermarry, and women were considered property.

    in reply to: America, Democrats, and Jewish Values #622952
    illini07
    Member

    While I am a fan of the “high wall of separation” between church (or shul) and state in this country, I cannot find any fault in voting based on religious viewpoints. That’s not to say I think it’s the smart way to vote, but I can certainly understand it. The beautiful thing about this country is that it’s the voter’s prerogative, and nobody can tell him/her what to think or why to vote a certain way. It’s left to the power of persuasion, and we hope and pray that the most persuasive party turns out to be the best…

    in reply to: Kosher Hangouts #634414
    illini07
    Member

    Zalmy:

    Your first post in this thread really hit the nail squarely on the head. It’s exactly what I have been saying for a number of years now. The only problem is, there is no potential to really fix anything when the Charedi community both refuses to admit that it may not always do things correctly, and insists on seeing everything as black-and-white, assur-or-muttar.

    in reply to: Barack Obama #624004
    illini07
    Member

    Mariner:

    You must not have thought that one out fully:

    1) “Obama has zero record on Israel. None, nada.”

    2) “The only things pro israel he voted for…”

    For #2 to be correct, #1 would necessarily have to be false.

    And I have no idea what the answer is, but has there even been a vote on moving the embassy since he was elected? On top of it, I do not agree with the underlying premise that not voting for moving the embassy is necessarily “anti-Israel.” Even if he votes AGAINST it, I have more respect for that then every single bozo who has SAID they would move it to Israel and then never even make a serious effort for it.

    So what if the HRC gave him a score of 89? As far as don’t ask don’t tell goes, would you rather not have enough soldiers and have the ones currently out there being killed for lack of support and backup? Civil unions have no effect on your religious institutions, so while I understand the disagreement over them, I don’t think it’s something to FEAR. It’s a matter for the states in any case really.

    in reply to: Barack Obama #624002
    illini07
    Member

    Joseph: only semi-seriously. But only because you’re a special case.

    Give me a break: I don’t hate Obama. I’m also not convinced that I should vote for him. There is a whole lot of shtus going on in this election cycle, much of it having very little relevance as to who will be the best president/vice president combination. I don’t know if I really think that McCain’s experience would make him any better of a President, and I don’t know if Obama would be able to make any of the significant changes he wants to. Neither will change the country’s stance on Israel, because it would be far too politically costly. The Democratic party enjoys a TON of support from Jews (because more Jews are non-frum than frum, and tend to vote Democrat), and would not risk that base. I think Biden is an infinitely better VP choice than Palin, who has not proved herself (at least to me) as anything but a ploy to create a “battle of the minorities,” and who has ALREADY shown that her ethics are questionable.

    In short, no I don’t hate Obama. I also have no idea if I’m going to vote for him. At this point, I’ll vote for anyone that removes the asinine requirement of removing my shoes every time I travel via airplane.

    in reply to: Barack Obama #623997
    illini07
    Member

    Mariner, please educate yourself. Obama has a perfect voting record on Israel himself to this point. It’s a shorter record, but indeed a record.

    I’m every bit as afraid of Jewish-ist advisors as I am of arab-ist advisors.

    in reply to: Why not Obama? #715113
    illini07
    Member

    I do find it humorous that the same people who say Obama has no experience and wouldn’t know the first thing about changing things up in the way he proposes are simultaneously hailing Palin as the next coming of the moshiach (pardon the phrase) – as if SHE is going to be a real reformer!

    This whole election is based on a lot of stupidity on both ends. It’s turned into a battle of the minorities.

    in reply to: Flanken Kugel #808059
    illini07
    Member

    UJM:

    You’ve posted other less-than-nice words about me, but Ooomis is right – I should have been dan l’kav zchus nonetheless. Therefor, I do apologize and ask for mechilah.

    (I do indeed have a sense of humor that has been shown, but some things aren’t exactly laughing material)

    in reply to: Flanken Kugel #808055
    illini07
    Member

    UJM:

    How DARE you. How dare you imply that I would either EAT or POST any non-kosher ingredients?

    That was a disgusting comment, especially in the month of Elul.

    in reply to: Barack Obama #623970
    illini07
    Member

    Jent:

    1) Yes, there was plenty wrong with McCarthy. Do you know ANY history at all?

    2) The rest of your post is nonsensical, and I don’t argue with people who wish to remain ignorant and don’t educate themselves. Nor will I continue to respond when you try to bait me with idiocy and ad-hominems.

    Good day sir. Refuah Shelemah.

    in reply to: Bar-B-Que #670908
    illini07
    Member

    First, you want to use a charcoal grill. While it’s a little more of a patchke, the flavor benefit is enormous. You can buy a Weber grill for probably around $50-75, or higher for the better models (but even the smallest Webers work great).

    To light the grill, get a charcoal chimney, which looks like a metal canister with a handle. In the large end, fill it with charcoal, then set it down right-side-up over a wad of newspaper set on fire. Leave the chimney over the newspaper for probably about 20 minutes or so, until the coals are all glowing hot. Then (carefully!) dump the coals into the grill, and spread them as evenly as possible under the cooking area (not necessarily the whole area, the coals should all be close to each other).

    Here’s a good recipe to get you started:

    Maple Mustard Grilled Chicken:

    1/2 cup canola oil

    1/2 cup pure maple syrup

    3 tbs balsamic vinegar

    2 tbs dijon mustard

    1 tsp black pepper

    1 tsp fresh minced garlic (2 – 3 cloves)

    6 chicken breasts or thighs, skinless and boneless (works best with boneless thighs)

    1) Using a large plastic container with a tightly-fitting cover, combine marinade ingredients, cover and shake well.

    2) Add chicken, cover again, and turn container upside down several times to coat. Refrigerate for 2 hours or more (overnight is best).

    3) Grill chicken for 10 minutes, turning once. Serve immediately for best flavor.

    Serves 6.

    B’Teyavon.

    in reply to: Flanken Kugel #808050
    illini07
    Member

    I’ve heard it referred to as “potato-kugel cholent” and it is indeed immensely delicious.

    I’ll see if I can find the recipe and share it.

    in reply to: Lessons in Language Arts #668923
    illini07
    Member

    Mariner:

    And I agree with you. But the fact of the matter is, the internet generally is not limited to 160 characters. If you abbreviate in a text message, that’s fine – but don’t carry that over to emails or internet messages where you have abundant space to write a coherent response.

    in reply to: Barack Obama #623951
    illini07
    Member

    Jent:

    Liberalism =/= Communism. Got that, McCarthy?

    Will Hill:

    When did I ever say it was racist? But you’re right – I do think that the WAY IN WHICH his middle name is thrown around here is disingenuous, dishonest, and reeks of fear-mongering. If you didn’t think it would have the effect of making people afraid that he is Muslim or has terrorist tendencies, you wouldn’t use it – plain and simple. Until you can provide another reason for using it (and don’t give me baloney about how you’re just calling him by his full name – you don’t do that for anyone else), that is EXACTLY what I think.

    Kitzur dot net:

    Perhaps you should stay home on election day. If you can’t be bothered to educate yourself, please don’t burden us with the possibility of decisions being made based on your ignorance.

    Mariner:

    Perhaps I misworded my statement – I think it’s wrong, not irresponsible.

    Your point on foreign policy is valid political discourse, but I don’t want to write a lengthy screed at this point. All I’ll say is that his Israel voting record is impeccable. On top of it, I’m voting for what’s best for this country, not what’s best for Israel. To the extent that those two overlap, that’s great. Foreign policy is much larger than Israel. The current administration has done nothing but alienate us from most of the world. Not only that, but McCain doesn’t have all that much foreign policy experience under his belt either.

    in reply to: Lessons in Language Arts #668920
    illini07
    Member

    I have to admit, though I realize that it is partially an effect of the medium which we are using, the posts with extreme grammatical, paragraph, spelling, and typographical errors do irk me. Perhaps I am old fashioned, but in my opinion, we should be treating electronic communication in the same way that we treat other forms of communication. The way you portray yourself through electronic means are indicative of the way you would present yourself in a written document – or at least that’s the attitude I use.

    Not to mention that it is extremely difficult to carry on a semi-intelligent conversation when you can’t understand what someone else is trying to say without taking it to a cryptologist.

    in reply to: Barack Obama #623933
    illini07
    Member

    While I think the advertisement is baloney, misguided, and irresponsible, it is a paid advertisement, and it says as much on the banner. I wouldn’t hold it against YW…

    in reply to: The Internet CAN cause harm! #1020824
    illini07
    Member

    Zalman:

    Nobody is arguing with the first post. The only question is: ok, why are you saying this? What is the chiddush?

    Everything is dangerous. I could start a post for every single thing that is dangerous, but you guys probably wouldn’t be too happy about that…

    in reply to: The Internet CAN cause harm! #1020818
    illini07
    Member

    Zalman:

    You analogy is fallacious. Pork is pork, and there is no kosher potential for it, whereas the internet does indeed have kosher uses. In fact, the idea of the internet in and of itself is kosher – what some do with it certainly is not, but in and of itself it is not treif.

    in reply to: The Internet CAN cause harm! #1020815
    illini07
    Member

    postsemgirl:

    Mariner didn’t use any bad words, and apparently the moderator did not think so either. I presume you object to her use of the word “heck.” That is a word that is commonly used to communicate a certain level of frustration/bewildered-ness in lieu of using words that might be considered expletives.

    Out of curiosity – how long have you been “post-seminary,” i.e., when did you return from seminary?

    in reply to: The Internet CAN cause harm! #1020813
    illini07
    Member

    Just me:

    EXACTLY.

    It makes me giggle when I see all of these people who think they are so holy, decrying the internet – yet they are sitting here arguing on it all day long!

    in reply to: The Internet CAN cause harm! #1020808
    illini07
    Member

    I don’t think anyone argues that.

    On the other hand, walking on the street can cause harm as well. So can using cell phones, eating hot dogs, drinking liquor, playing sports, sitting in a chair, flipping pages in a book, etc…

    What exactly is your point?

    in reply to: New Reason For Shidduch Crisis #998938
    illini07
    Member

    I agree with nameless 100%

    in reply to: New to YWN, & Frumkeit – Questions? #626333
    illini07
    Member

    A good *starting point*, and I want to stress – starting point – is a book called “To Be A Jew.” It’s particularly good for someone new to practicing Judaism generally (which you seem to be).

    Another book, which deals with a very specific aspect of practicing Judaism is called “Guard Your Tongue.” In my humble opinion, it all starts and ends with the words that come out of your mouth – which makes this a particularly instructive book.

    There are some more references I can suggest, and I will post them when I have the time.

    Until then, only the greatest success in your journey. It is exceptionally inspirational to come across people such as yourself, who have immense strength, faith, and belief.

    Have a most wonderful and peaceful shabbos.

    in reply to: Modern Music…..prohibited? #621745
    illini07
    Member

    Feivel:

    Perhaps it is those who think that there is exactly one right answer, that it is “their way or the highway” who do not understand the basic elements of yiddishkeit.

    See blueshirt’s last post for a succinct, well-stated summary.

    in reply to: Modern Music…..prohibited? #621723
    illini07
    Member

    it’s really quite silly, as others have pointed out, because so much “Jewish” music has been derived from goyish music.

    These are people in it for the power and control. Religion is a power much like political office in its potential for abuse.

    Incidentally, I stiill remember in high school a classmate was yelled at for listening to (relatively benign) non-Jewish music during sefira. The student replied “but rebbe, you said this is garbage, not music!”

    in reply to: “Harry” #804297
    illini07
    Member

    A fictional wizard?

    in reply to: Text Messaging #1116337
    illini07
    Member

    Willi, I think you’re right on that one. I find texting to be cumbersome and irritating (I much prefer email, an instant message, or a telephone call), but the times that I do text, I make certain not to get into those bad habits. I have gotten emails from younger relatives using the compounded texting form, and I always make it a point to comment on it and make sure they understand that they need to maintain the ability to communicate normally, including proper spelling and grammar.

    in reply to: Internet vs. Yiddishkeit #627477
    illini07
    Member

    Why is everything discussed in terms of (Insert modern development here) vs. Yiddishkeit? Would it not be more productive to find ways to integrate things to make them compatible with Yiddishkeit (this site being an example in itself)?

    in reply to: Rambam on Marriage #626210
    illini07
    Member

    Will Hill:

    It would be disingenuous to suggest that SOME interpretation of halacha and many of our traditions have evolved in light of the contextual and historical backdrop of the times. That’s not necessarily to say that halacha changes, but to suggest that everything in Judaism has remained the same since its inception would be woefully ignorant of reality (and history).

    in reply to: Out Of The Mailbag: Jewish Kindness #620820
    illini07
    Member

    It’s stories like these that make you forget your differences with others and be proud to stand together.

    in reply to: Should pro-freikeit commentors be given a voice? #626045
    illini07
    Member

    Feif Un:

    You and me both…

    in reply to: Dating Dilemmas #621215
    illini07
    Member

    UJM:

    Your post still makes no sense. And as I pointed out, chivalry is in NO WAY a “liberal” sensibility. So keep playing the “liberal” card if you will, but it only reinforces your lack of any intelligent contribution.

    in reply to: Blame the Liberals #620570
    illini07
    Member

    Well said, squeak. People seem to conveniently forget that there’s no simple dichotomy.

    in reply to: Dating Dilemmas #621208
    illini07
    Member

    UJM:

    In what way does your last post have ANY relevance to what I said? Respond to my argument, not to whatever image you have (likely incorrectly) painted of me in your head.

    in reply to: Divorce Crisis #697203
    illini07
    Member

    It did for them. For most people, it ends in unhappiness.

    in reply to: Dating Dilemmas #621197
    illini07
    Member

    Joseph, none of what you have said adequately explains why a bochur cannot open the car door for a woman, and especially why doing so would be inappropriate. At very best, halacha goes neither way (assuming that the bochur figures out a way not to walk behind her).

    in reply to: Dating Dilemmas #621189
    illini07
    Member

    UJM:

    Chivalry has no basis in Yiddishkeit? What on earth do you call Aishes Chayil? Is there an explicit Torah source for opening the door or walking a girl out of the car? Maybe not. That’s no excuse not to be a gentleman. Going above and beyond never killed anyone, not is it inappropriate.

    Also, for the record, such chivalry would actually be considered more CONSERVATIVE. “Liberals,” as you would call them, would more likely be offended by the notion of chivalry as it has connotations of females being the “weaker” gender. But I wouldn’t want to get in the way of your blaming everything on liberal Americans, so by all means…

    in reply to: Divorce Crisis #697199
    illini07
    Member

    Yossi, I agree completely. Knowing someone for < 6 months is hardly enough time to figure out whether you are a LIFELONG compatible partner with someone. Love takes time to develop – and yes, love should be present BEFORE the marriage occurs.

    As far as I can tell, “pru u’rvu” does not mean that one has to be in such a rush to get married that it ends in divorce. You have the rest of your lives together, take a little longer to find the one who is right for life. Even if that means…gasp…dating for over a year!

    in reply to: Bais Yaakovs Today #713638
    illini07
    Member

    Think BIG: you make some very good points, and I largely defer to your experience as a teacher (you sound like a good one). There is obviously the right balance to be struck between pushing kids to do their best and acknowledging accomplishment but realizing that one might not ever excel in a certain area. I think we have grown a little too sensitive of self-esteem to the point where we inflate accomplishments so that nobody feels they are sub-par. Self-esteem is important, but take too far this can be dangerous and hinder improvement. Again, a balance that needs to be struck, and the ones teaching our kids are those who are put in the difficult situation of trying to strike that balance. Yishar koach.

    in reply to: definition of average #623318
    illini07
    Member

    I think that average can be a relative term – if one is described in average, it could be average in comparison to all others considering that we are made b’tzelem Elokim. I’ve found that everyone has at least one thing that they excel in, whether they realize it or not. Often times, the ones who are modest or overly self-critical and don’t think they excel at anything are the ones who truly excel at the most.

    in reply to: Bais Yaakovs Today #713633
    illini07
    Member

    Think BIG:

    Sure, some subjects are inherently difficult, and may cause frustration to students. But what message does it send to not teach them as a result? That if something is difficult and frustrating, it should be abandoned?

    The better view is probably that the students should be pushed harder, and taught better, until they are at a level where they excel and are no longer frustrated. I’m sure reading is often frustrating for young children, but we don’t stop teaching that.

    Even if much of the material is re-taught in college, having to deal with the material in high school not only teaches work ethic and forces better study habits and learning skills, but it also sinks in more than you think. I cannot tell you how many times in college I took a class that covered material substantially similar to that which I encountered in high school, and found that I remembered more than I thought. As much as you don’t realize, you absorb knowledge and information even though you think you’ve forgotten it all. It comes back out when you are again confronted with similar material.

    Gavra:

    I would agree that a “B” is a good grade – it is above average. However, I believe that there is no such thing as setting goals too high. Not to the point where a kid gets in trouble if he/she does not get an A or A+, but every child should feel that they can do better, and push themselves. That is the way you improve – not by accepting what you already have. I thank my wonderful parents constatly for always pushing me and telling me I can do even better than I was (and I was doing pretty well). I hated it at the time, but in the end, they were right and I would not have learned it if not for them. It should be mentioned that all of this is relevant equally, if not moreso, to limudei kodesh.

    in reply to: Kids surfing the Web #620320
    illini07
    Member

    Aidle & Native:

    I haven’t had the chance to peruse the conversation yet, but on its face, I do not see why a legitimate discussion concerning the divorce rate is inappropriate for a 13 year-old. A 13 year-old certainly has a grasp on the concept of divorce, and might even have inklings of its social implications. They may not be at a marriageable age yet, but I see no inherent reason why divorce should be off-limits for a 13yo. The truth is that it’s out there, and they are exposed whether we like it or not; we might as well have them be informed.

    in reply to: Kids surfing the Web #620307
    illini07
    Member

    There may be mature issues discussed here, but I don’t think I have seen any that have been inappropriate for a 13 year old. Kids are more perceptive than people think, and can pick up on issues that adults often think they are oblivious to. The best way to deal with that is to educate and inform them, and speak to them on a mature level (not that this always happens around here).

    in reply to: Out Of The Mailbag: (Do As I Do) #620212
    illini07
    Member

    Well-said, workingman. Torah, they have. Derech Eretz and Ben Adam L’Chavero, not so much.

    And jent, speaking in cohesive and complete sentences is not only useful for conducting business. For instance, when you learn b’chavrusa, and don’t speak coherently, you will have problems. Additionally, people perceive your level of intelligence in large part based upon how you speak and write. If you are ok with going through life perceived to be less intelligent than you actually are (and I do believe that you are intelligent, albeit slightly misguided), then that’s fine. But it also makes communicating with you and exchanging ideas nearly impossible. How can you expect anyone to see what you believe is the errors of their ways if they can’t comprehend half of what you wrote? From a purely logical standpoint, it makes no sense. The only things that are always clear in your posts are your attacks on others.

    in reply to: Daveing with Crocs #620653
    illini07
    Member

    ujm:

    A REAL yirei shomayim pays attention to his own kavanah, and doesn’t worry about what others are wearing. Who are you to decide who is a yirei shomayim based on footwear? I know several people who are true yirei shomayim that don’t wear hats or jackets (with the exception of the shabbos suit) – not because it is inconvenient or uncomfortable for them, but rather because it is what they grew up doing, and have always done.

    Do you think HKBH doesn’t know what is going on within the heart of each person? Stop worrying so much about others, and work on yourself.

    in reply to: Should pro-freikeit commentors be given a voice? #625989
    illini07
    Member

    Feif Un, I feel you on this one. I ask and all I get pointed out to me is a simple factual statement about the humanity and fallibility of Jews…

Viewing 50 posts - 151 through 200 (of 215 total)