Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
As a married frum man I noticed that so far nobody has written “married women dress to look good for their husband”.
That’s exactly the problem! The same women who dress to kill on the street (with a complete disregard of tznius), dress like a shlumpy maid in the house with their husband. Makes one wonder.
Oomis, tznius is a strict legal requirement in Judaism, whilst kindheartedness is very appropriate but not legislated by law unlike tznius, hence tznius clearly being more important.
Sacrilege is being honest with herself when she notes women dress to be noticed by men.
Ok kaputsa, you can now become an orthodox rabbi. Orthodox rabbi Avi Weiss so paskened. One can get their female semicha and become a rabba. Its Orthodox rabbi Weiss’ psak. Don’t dare disrespect this orthodox rabbis decision or question it.
And enjoy that cheeseburger.
And what if an orthodox rabbi allows his congregants to drive to shul on shabbos and eat in any mcdonalds? Must we quitely respect that and mind our own business?
What did you say? No real orthodox rabbi would allow his congregants to do so? Correct. Nor would such allow uncovered elbows.
Oomis, those you describe are definitly not zonas, but they just as definitely they are prutzas. Uncovered knees getting into a car or uncovered elbows most definitly falls into the category of a prutza.
I agree with sacrilige and rabbi108300. This is completely wrong.
I completely agree with mdd. We not only have a mitzvah of tochocho, we have a chiyuv of tochocho. We are obligated halachicly to rebuke a sinning prutza. And while calling them a zona is usually overstating it, prutza is 100% clearly the correct and appropriate term for these sinners.
How would co-op homeschooling be practical for Limudei Kodesh, considering the qualifications required and men available (i.e. not working) to teach?
squeak,
How would co-op homeschooling be practical for Limudei Kodesh, considering the qualifications required for it and by men who are available to teach it?
Clearly being untznius in front of a goy is 100% assur as it is “pritzus”. The only exception is a nochri lifeguard, since he is a life saver. See Igros Moshe EH 4:62:1.
Does having both credit card AND personal auto insurance coverage provide additional coverage than just one or the other?
This is an Orthodox forum.
My comment was intended for the repeated nature I described of the comments of a particular poster, not a general class or group.
Perhaps Jax can “surprise” us too…
areivim, perhaps icot can take my hint even w/out squeak…
Mazal Tov areivim!!
See, good things do happen when out of the CR…
May you and your Chossen build a bayis ne’eman b’yisroel!
gavra, I don’t see any contradictions. It isn’t saying its okay to prance around bare chested. But ipso facto if he already said kriyas shema like that, the shema was yotza.
Siman Beis is halacha l’maaisa like every other part of SA.
And it is clearly 100% assur for a woman to be untzniusdik in front of a goy or otherwise.
“women who do not choose to understand things”
Women shouldn’t be “choosing understandings” on halachic issues.
And again, you don’t have to be a kohein to be rewarded like Kimchis. The point is one is greatly rewarded for tznius like Kimchis. The great reward can come in many forms.
Are you kidding re: being non-tznius in front of goyim??
Btw, where/who did you hear kol isha is ok in front of a goy?
mw13, its called for when someone repeatedly and constantly twists gemorahs not to her liking to reinterpert it to her liking — often with the exact opposite meaning the gemorah intended. I repeat, this has been a pattern.
What coverage for a rental does your own personal auto insurance provide, on top of what the credit card company provides?
Oomis, since when do women give their own narrowminded teitch of gemorahs? Yes, the gemorah cites Kimchis because the gemorah agrees with her. And no, the gemorah is not C”V “mistaken”, nor does the gemorah affirmatively and positively cite “mistaken” people.
The point about Kimchis isn’t only applicable to Kohanim. The point is by applying such tznius one will be greatly rewarded.
Since even socks are halachicly supposed to be donned and removed under the blanket, I don’t see any heter to dress any less in the house (including during exercise) than how one is required to be dressed outside the house.
No it all, good point about such pritzusdik body movements.
Even men need to undress under the blanket.
Zats mich moichel, rabbosai.
Boys go to Eretz Yisroel to grow in Torah in the Yeshiva.
Girls don’t have that need.
There can be no sacrifice in ruchni.
Leasing is the most expensive option, in the long term.
Chosson is correct. Even when undressing in your very own bedroom with no one else present, you are supposed to do so only under the blanket.
Dr. Pepper-
I am curious. When you make a l’chaim, do you use soda instead of schnapps?
SJS, WHAT?!? You’re really advocating invasion of your children’s privacy by snooping on who they call and text? What ever happened to these children’s constitutional rights?!?
What’s next?? I hope you’re not gonna also advocate taking away the internet on their phones. I mean what if they need to research (with their full legal rights of privacy) some “homework”?
This is just as bad as abrogating these children’s right to a cellphone. Don’t you have enough faith in your child’s chinuch to trust your children with these necessities?
What has society come to?
Forget individual stocks. You CANNOT beat the market. Even highly experianced investors cannot. Put your money in index funds, which average as good returns as mutual funds, but with much less fees.