Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
HaLeiViParticipant
There is a concept of Yoshav Velo Avar Aveira, but that’s only when the situation comes up and you refrained because of the Mitzva. It could be that even if you can’t do it, but you have in mind that you will not do it now because of the Mitzva, it also has merit. I think I once heard of something like this.
The idea of Lefum Tzara Agra doesn’t negate S’char from a Mitzva that was easily come by – it only adds to it.
HaLeiViParticipantThanks, Pashuta Yid. Very powerfull.
Other than focusing on the reasons for going off, which are as many as there are people, we can focus on the routes to going OTD. Either Emuna starts to go or interest in the outside world gains a bigger and bigger place in the mind or the Taava.
Each of these things target different situations. What makes someone susceptible to any of these could be anything, but the challenges available are pretty specific, and can be addressed. The Gemara does say about the Taava of Arayos that it takes the person till the end. It doesn’t say about Lashon Harra that thinking about it is worse than doing it.
HaLeiViParticipantSacrilege. (fake), MosheRose?
HaLeiViParticipantDoes embarrassing someone in the CR count?
HaLeiViParticipantBut isn’t that the best thing for the human race? I mean, instead of bad genes laying dorment for generations, let nature root it out right away! This should be good German logic.
SJS, why are you talking about commitment and coercion within the framework of a regular legal agreement of money and medical decisions? It should be an option to have again agreements and one way agreements, too.
HaLeiViParticipantIf they want to they can make a new kind of arrangement without any mention of marriage that would be exactly what you mention, a legal contract for visitation and inheritance. The document should work for siblings and dogs or caretakers. The fact is, they are after the Marriage title. They are actualy after the Marriage Institution. So look at it this way: We, the people at Marriage Institution, want to keep our institution running. You can open your own if you so desire, but don’t knock down my time honored institution.
If the government sanctions this redefinition, it is the new norm. Government is not your quiet neighbor. It is the creator of standards, or breaker thereof.
HaLeiViParticipantI’m considering Tumtum as one Kasha (not anymore) and Aylonis as a second.
HaLeiViParticipantWhile I consider the first Kasha answered, the second one is definitely a hard one. It was an attempt, not definitive. Anyhow, not necessarily does it have to mean that there was nothing at all. It could be refering to essential parts.
October 24, 2010 4:18 pm at 4:18 pm in reply to: Your theory what Mosherose true motivation is? #704416HaLeiViParticipantThanks Venish, and I fully agree with your serious note. As I wrote earlier, when I couldn’t stand the Hashkafos in the other site, I stopped going there. It just doesn’t make sense that he would consistently post the same thing.
HaLeiViParticipant- Cooking with a microwave. Since cooking in direct sunlight is Muttar because it is not Derech Bishul, although cooking by something heated from the sun is Assur. So is a microwave the new Derech or is it too similar to other methods and therefore has a Din of Tolda Dechama or is it Muttar?
- Is it Doresh El Hameisim to communicate with a spirit through white noise?
- Would one put on Teffilin on an artificial but fully integrated arm?
- Is pressing buttons on an electronic device Assur on Shabbos? Is any closing of a circut considered Nolad, Tikkun Manne, Makka Bepatish, or Binyan; or only turning on the device?
HaLeiViParticipantWith regard to Tumtum, Tosafos in Yevamos 64, I think, says that obviously that was resolved by the time they were married. The point is more that anyone that was that way can’t have or is unlikely to have children. As far as Ailoness goes, perhaps it is still possible to have a cycle with out being fully equipped.
October 24, 2010 2:10 pm at 2:10 pm in reply to: Some basic Halacha that is ignored in 100% of shuls by 99% of the Kahal #708682HaLeiViParticipantHe didn’t ignore it. He wrote that he sees now that there is a Hetter but he will continue to be Makpid Keshuras Haddin. V’tavo Alav Bracha.
As a rule, if you want people to admit to you when you are right, you have to allow them. If they know that you’ll laugh and say, “See? I’m right and you’re wrong!”, they’ll just refrain from admitting. Just as you must be a gracious loser, so to must you be a gracious winner. Ben’fol Oivecha Al Tagil.
October 24, 2010 2:03 pm at 2:03 pm in reply to: Your theory what Mosherose true motivation is? #704413HaLeiViParticipantNow let’s see if we can figure out what his other screen name is. Is it one of the moderators, just to add some spice to the conversation? Hey, y’know? It’s growing on me. Why would the moderator let such a conversation go on if it’s not really him, and the Moderator is the only one who took him really serious! McCarthyism?
October 24, 2010 11:44 am at 11:44 am in reply to: YWN Asks Rav Moshe Shternbuch About R' Yehuda Levin #703124HaLeiViParticipantCheck the Midrash.
HaLeiViParticipantDo you work for the KGB?
October 24, 2010 4:22 am at 4:22 am in reply to: Your theory what Mosherose true motivation is? #704410HaLeiViParticipantmw13, you can’t make up my position and then argue with it. I did not mention what you said in my argument, and you did not refute or mention what I wrote. Only helpful Helpful addressed my last point.
October 24, 2010 4:17 am at 4:17 am in reply to: Your theory what Mosherose true motivation is? #704409HaLeiViParticipantBeHappy, are you mosherose? We are discussing a screen name, and are trying to decide if he is for real or not. Am I falling into a trap by answering you?
October 22, 2010 4:55 pm at 4:55 pm in reply to: Your theory what Mosherose true motivation is? #704388HaLeiViParticipantStrong instead of B, And EM instead of I.
October 22, 2010 3:21 pm at 3:21 pm in reply to: Your theory what Mosherose true motivation is? #704384HaLeiViParticipantIt’s very improbable that he is genuine. He doesn’t join any conversation, or say anything other than his rubber stamp. Also, someone that has such different views than the whole crowd and doesn’t find any like minded comrads, would leave. When I saw how the other site was full of Hashkafos that I despised of, I left. Neither would he have kept quiet on this thread (now it’s too late).
October 22, 2010 1:40 pm at 1:40 pm in reply to: Your theory what Mosherose true motivation is? #704369HaLeiViParticipantI wonder if he has another screen name in which his Dr. Jeckel side gets to have a say.
October 22, 2010 1:37 pm at 1:37 pm in reply to: Your theory what Mosherose true motivation is? #704368HaLeiViParticipantHe doesn’t sound for real. I forget which thread it was, but there was a discussion questioning a Halacha and he posted his rubber stamp there, too. Even someone with extreme Haskafos knows that Torah is to be discussed.
HaLeiViParticipantThe kind of person that makes people feel good is the one that actualy means it. That is the real trick: to first tell yourself or think so in the first place, and then tell the guy Devarim Hayotzim Min Halev. I know people who spray wonderful words at everyone, and I have a very hard time talking to them. You just know when someone is saying something because the words are nice.
October 21, 2010 8:39 pm at 8:39 pm in reply to: Are the Reform and Conservative Still Jewish? #755211HaLeiViParticipantWIY, Is it a valid conversion if he thinks it’s fine to pass in front of someone Davening :?)
HaLeiViParticipantisland, there was a large
HaLeiViParticipantTo those who don’t understand or have a problem the original question,
This is a term that people use. The question is, what is its usage. I don’t recal using it myself, because it’s not a ‘real’ description. But I would say that it refers to the kind of person who has his own ambitions, the person who isn’t afraid to keep himself company. This is much more than just saying the truth or not being two faced. A person is more of a real person, so to speak, when his actions are based on his own plans and he’s aware of himself. The opposite of this is someone who always tries to elicit a laugh from anyone; who in a sense doesn’t live for himself; who depends on others for his identity.
October 21, 2010 5:37 pm at 5:37 pm in reply to: Some basic Halacha that is ignored in 100% of shuls by 99% of the Kahal #708668HaLeiViParticipantLook, that’s a possible distinction, but not the kind that you make up without a Kasha to answer. I think the ball lies in your Rav’s hands.
Just a thought: Although many of us have a hard time keeping a focus on the meaning of the words, we are still aware of who we are praying to and standing in front of. We still want him to listen, and we say at the end, Yihyu Leratzon Imrei Fi. Therefore there is no reason for the Shechina not to be there. In other words, although you stopped thinking about De’ah, Bina and Haskel, you still think about Baruch Ato Hashem.
But do you agree at least not to knock people over?
October 21, 2010 4:03 pm at 4:03 pm in reply to: Some basic Halacha that is ignored in 100% of shuls by 99% of the Kahal #708665HaLeiViParticipantAlso, it is Assur to knock over someone Davening, even if you are already passing through. I think we can all agree on that one.
October 21, 2010 2:33 pm at 2:33 pm in reply to: Some basic Halacha that is ignored in 100% of shuls by 99% of the Kahal #708663HaLeiViParticipantThe Gemara says already that we don’t have Kavana and the Halacha exists nevertheless. But, I have heard numerous Heteirim through the years. There are stories of Gedolim who stayed out of Shul until everyone finished.
There are a few things involved here. Walking in front is Assur because of Kavana. Passing through or sitting, for a non-Mitzva is a problem all around because of the presence of the Shechina. Perhaps the less Kavana someone has, the less you have have to worry about the first part but the second, albeit less Chamur, problem still exists.
There is a concept in other areas of Halacha that you can’t Assur someone else’s property. I’ve heard this applied to our topic, too. In the isles and even near other places, when the person is sort of stepping into others’ territory, he is giving up or can’t Assur his 4 Ammos.
We can always see Medakdekim being careful about this, but it’s hard to give numbers because most people stay by their place throughout the Tefilla.
HaLeiViParticipantAlso, learning the Halachos gives you a connection to the time.
HaLeiViParticipantVegetarians is a much better example than your women and black examples. However, the issue here is that we are not stopping them from doing what they want – the equivalent to stopping us from eating meat, we just want to keep our own turf, too. We, the normal people don’t want the government sanctioning the breakdown of the concept of a normal marriage. Like I wrote earlier, they can get their visitation and inheritance rights without doing this. The only reason they are being so vociferous about it is to make US teach OUR kids that our own values aren’t true.
I get the feeling, SJS, that you feel that you owe the world everything for the fact that you are Jewish. While I am thankful for the tolerance America offers, I don’t have that complex.
HaLeiViParticipantOne more point is not to evaluate yourself during Shabbos, asking yourself what you are presently feeling. Sometimes after the fact it is easier to look back and realize how wonderful it was. Focus rather on how to utilize this holy time, and that makes the Kedusha a part of you. Hashem gives up these feelings sometimes to show us what we can reach. You didn’t falter by not retaining it – it was a gift of being to gain a real live understanding of what levels there are to attain.
May your life be filled with Kedusha.
HaLeiViParticipantBecause it’s a waste of a thought if you don’t ‘get the message out.’
Sometimes I feel like I’ll actually make a difference. It’s also fun, of course – it’s like giving a speech without having the fright that comes along with it.
Maybe we can start a thread on Would You Be Willing To Divulge Your Identity. After some shouting matches and a few silly statements and jokes that fall flat . . _ would you be willing to still show your face?
HaLeiViParticipantmosherose to the rescue!
HaLeiViParticipantAnd you don’t believe in Mutav Sheyapil Atzmo Letoch Kivshon Ha’eish, that it is worth throwing oneself in a fire rather than to embarras someone.
The three things that the Gemara mention where it is permitted to lie are cases of humility, modesty and consideration. To transgress an Aveira in order to say the truth is ridiculous.
October 18, 2010 8:08 pm at 8:08 pm in reply to: Hashem talks to you every day, how to see Hashgacha pratis #701694HaLeiViParticipantAccording to psychologists (and common sense, of course), lack of discipline to our children causes a disconnect rather than a connection. The child doesn’t feel that he is living up to a standard and is left on his own. When you demand something from him, that is a psychological grasp, or holding his (mental) hand.
In the same vain, we feel Hashem’s love when he answers our Tefillos, but there is also a very strong and close connection to be realized when we get a message of discipline, too. For example, once I was in a rush and therefore didn’t want to go a little out of my way for someone. As I went on my way the road became blocked, and I ended up having to go down that same street that the person wanted to go. This is not a Ness, but when it happens right away and in the manner of instant feedback you feel the closeness of Hashem as a father guiding His son.
October 18, 2010 2:21 pm at 2:21 pm in reply to: Hashem talks to you every day, how to see Hashgacha pratis #701691HaLeiViParticipantWhy is that a Stira? Everything is planned, but for some there are better plans.
I never saw someone be Modeh in the CR. Is it just a trick to get me to be Modeh :?)
HaLeiViParticipantI agree that it is of marginal importance but I wonder if it is really global or just regional, or perhaps a global shift. It seems that whenever there is a heatwave in one place, somewhere else is getting its coolest record. Besides the fact that the data was found to be rigged, the real estimate was for one or two degrees change over a century. Therefore, how can they declare on hot days that it is a display of global warning?
October 18, 2010 2:34 am at 2:34 am in reply to: Some basic Halacha that is ignored in 100% of shuls by 99% of the Kahal #708609HaLeiViParticipantWIY, Oh so that’s you?
Reb Menashe Klein writes that there is an understanding today when someone Shtells in middle of nowhere or even in a packed Shul, that it isn’t his space and people may pass. I think there are others, too, who pulled up Heteirim.
HaLeiViParticipantFirst of all, perhaps you are not aware, but they are very aggressive. They made the schools change their books to redefine family. They would go after anyone who publicly denounces such activity. In Europe, a preacher was sued or arrested. My main issue is the fact that they are making the general public redefine something which is against their morality. All those abilities that you mention can be granted by consention forms, and if not, I’m fine with changing that. But we don’t have to hinder our morality. Remember, we aren’t against a people, we are against a behavior.
HaLeiViParticipantDo you have any problem with those who call themselves Messianic Jews? I do, and I believe I have a right to. It is highjacking something which belongs to someone already.
HaLeiViParticipantThey hated Jews. That’s all. They knew that we don’t believe in their beliefs, and that bothered them. In America it was decided, for the benefit of those who were tormented in other lands, to tolerate someone who doesn’t hold your beliefs. They never agreed to accept that Christianity was wrong! Neither would they tolerate us redefining Christianity as The Religion of Plunder.
October 15, 2010 1:55 pm at 1:55 pm in reply to: Hashem talks to you every day, how to see Hashgacha pratis #701681HaLeiViParticipantThat is bad news. You just dismiss a Gemara like that? I would much faster dismiss something from the Moreh Nevuchim, like most of Klal Yisroel. The Rambam himself doesn’t use what he wrote there, in the Yad.
Anyhow, the Rambam starts off by bringing alot of Pesukim showing that everything happens for a reason. Then he says that this is only for humans – there is no Gezeira from Hashem specifically on any specific animal or leaf that it should fall or be caught. Then he goes on to say that since the special Hashgacha is due to the Sechel, it follows that the more you got the more Hashgacha you’ll have. For an example, he mentions the special Shmira that the Avos had. Then he mentions that Risho’im lose their Hashgacha, they lose their Shmira, and will certainly get hurt soon enough. What you wrote here, to someone else, is the outlook that the Rambam attributes to Aristotle.
What the Rambam writer about Risho’im is nothing new. It is a Pasuk, Vehelachtem Imi Bakkeri… This is also with Din. It is in fact what Chazal say about Mipi Elyon Lo Tetzei Haraos. Whenever something bad happens, it wasn’t Hashem’s hand punishing, it was Hashem leaving the culprit alone.
If what you say is true, we wouldn’t make a Birchas Hagomel. You would have to thank Chance instead of Goodness.
Another point: The Mekubalim say that even what the Rambam says is a Mikre, is also from Hashem. This too is not necessarily refuting the Rambam’s words. They also would agree that there is no Gezeira on each leaf. Being, though, that Hashem made the world and its weather and all the randomness comes from Him. So the idea is that ever thin that happens is Hashem’s plan. Even, and especially, the Mekubalim agree that there are Mazalos at play. Yet they still say that everything is from Hashem.
HaLeiViParticipantThere goes that silly argument about blacks and women… Explain please, what is moral about not giving blacks an equal footing? I’m talking about wanting to stay up, while you talk about wanting to stay down. Besides, blacks and the others are a people who were singled out unfairly. This is a behavior which we don’t have to accept.
HaLeiViParticipantAgain, and again, nobody is denying any rights, we are denying redefinition of morality. Who exactly was born with the right to change everyone else’s values?
HaLeiViParticipantSJS, The idea here is that being a free country, we won’t stop them. However, the movement is an aggressive one. They force it on everyone to accept such behavior as normal. That is called infringing on the rights of normal people to maintain our own values and the right to impart our moral values to our children. Please don’t equate maintaining morality with racism.
The marriage contract thing is only one rung in their ladder to change the whole society. They don’t need it that badly for any other purpose. And there too, what’s so bad about being allowed to keep our definition of the word? If they really need a contract they can use all the other new words; ‘marriage’ is taken.
HaLeiViParticipantWIY, your first point bothers me, too. Your second point, though, not really, or not that much. The Gemara says that the reason the nations are still around is because they don’t sell human flesh in the meat market and they don’t write a Kesuba for this garbage. In other words, this is the bottom. It is in fact the worst thing.
Until recently, I didn’t have much of an opinion about his actions. It was a little weird that he his on his own and rails against the leaders of today’s Jewry. This recent thing of having an outsider read off a derogatory speech about Rebbes and Rabbanim is just way too far.
October 14, 2010 7:43 pm at 7:43 pm in reply to: Hashem talks to you every day, how to see Hashgacha pratis #701679HaLeiViParticipantWow! That’s some lengthly way of saying, “I didn’t understand, please explain.”
Listen closely, I’m talking about a GEMARA. What do you say about that GEMARA. Do the Rishonim you mention argue on the GEMARA? I’m willing to expound somewhat on the difference between the two concepts, but please tell me, how do you learn that GEMARA?
Now, the point is that although Hashem decides everything that happens, not always do we get a private audience and our need/wants catered to, personally. The difference is in the treatment, not in the attention. I mentioned the fact that the Rambam refers to the Gemara about the Amora pointing out where rain is needed. This is a hint to what concept the Rambam is discussing.
October 14, 2010 2:40 pm at 2:40 pm in reply to: Hashem talks to you every day, how to see Hashgacha pratis #701670HaLeiViParticipantYou are ignoring the Gemara that I mentioned, and that is not fine. As I said earlier, the Rambam and the Ramban are talking about being cared for on a personal basis. That is the literal Hashgacha Pratis, personal attention. We are discussing the idea that everything is preplanned. This is mentioned in the Gemara, Geonim, and Rishonim as well.
It is a mistake to confuse the two concepts, no matter how common the mistake.
October 14, 2010 8:04 am at 8:04 am in reply to: Hashem talks to you every day, how to see Hashgacha pratis #701668HaLeiViParticipantAre you trying to tell me that the Rishonim are arguing on the famous Gemara of Ein Adam Nokef Etzbao Ad Shenigzer Alov Milemaalo?
Like I said, they are not talking about what you are talking about. If you’d look at the Rambam, you would see that as an example of the ‘Hashgacha Pratis’, he references the Gemara about the Amora who would go through his fields and point out exactly which spots needed rain, and it rained exactly in those areas. That is definitely a Hanhaga reserved for Tzaddikim.
The point of Machlokes among the Rishonim is if animals also have Hashgacha or just in the general sense.
HaLeiViParticipantWolfish, so you are from the religion-is-cruel camp? I mean, we shake Lulav. How is that any different than a group of hoodlums brandishing knives?
I’m discussing the idea that they are trying to force their values on the rest of us, and you talk about hate mongers. It seems to me that they actually succeeded in their quest to reeducate the masses. Just read the last few comments and realize the ideology espoused.
Yes, I reserve the right to maintain my morals. It’s actually weird that you guys turn the tables and aquate immorality with the just cause of non-discrimination, and the refusal to drop normal, clean and moral standards with mean behavior. This is the fruits of the whole campaign to smear moral people, as if morality equals aloofness and cruelty.
They worked hard to make ‘moralist’ a derogatory term, and they found a customer in you. If I don’t let you spit in my face, I obviously would never hold the door for you, right?
Please realise when you are duped.
-
AuthorPosts