haifagirl

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 901 through 950 (of 1,523 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Short Skirts – No Excuses #696508
    haifagirl
    Participant

    Just one quick story about a short skirt. I was at a Chinese auction. The woman in charge was wearing a skirt that just covered her knees. Barely.

    The problem was she was standing on a stage. Those sitting in the first row could see halfway up her thighs. Luckily there were no men there. But it was still not appropriate.

    One must be careful to consider where one will be when choosing what to wear. Something that may be okay in one context might not be in another.

    in reply to: Short Skirts – No Excuses #696502
    haifagirl
    Participant

    Why is this thread so negative? “Tell the girls not to [insert whatever here].”

    How about doing something positive? How about having tznius fashion shows? Make tznius clothing look attractive and the girls (and women) will want to wear it. How about ads for tznius clothing in magazines geared to women? If all girls are exposed to is from the secular world, and they have nothing to compare it to, where is the choice?

    in reply to: Torah Riddles #960029
    haifagirl
    Participant

    Dr. Pepper and FrummyMcFrum:

    Perhaps I’m being dense from lack of nourishment today, but I don’t understand what your answers to #2 have to do with chutz la’aretz.

    in reply to: Tznius in front of Non Jews #694655
    haifagirl
    Participant

    Why would it require extra strength to pull someone out of the water, as all bodies are buoyant?

    I don’t know for sure, but I’m guessing it may have to do with the frum women wearing robes and such when they are swimming. Add the weight of those water-soaked clothes, it may require extra strength.

    As I said, I don’t know, but it wouldn’t surprise me if that were the case.

    in reply to: Discrimination Against Baalei Teshuva #1035478
    haifagirl
    Participant

    I am so glad I live out of town. But I still don’t understand why Eretz Yisroel is “out of town.”

    in reply to: salad recipes without vinegar #812102
    haifagirl
    Participant

    The people I know who don’t use vinegar also don’t use lemon juice. They use orange juice in their salad dressings.

    in reply to: wearing a tank top with a shell under??? #694408
    haifagirl
    Participant

    Do you know what a prutzah is? If people really understood then they wouldn’t toss this word around as if it were nothing.

    Thank you SJSinNYC for being the voice of reason in this discussion.

    in reply to: To accept all children #694294
    haifagirl
    Participant

    I absolutely disagree. This reminds me of when I was learning triage. The rule there was “do the greatest good for the greatest number.” If accepting one child now means 50 children will lose their education in the future, it isn’t worth it.

    in reply to: egged puts passengers convenience before their safety? #784241
    haifagirl
    Participant

    Show of hands: How many people who CURRENTLY live in Eretz Yisroel and regularly travel on buses would prefer wi-fi on intercity buses? How many people would prefer an updated fare system?

    My hand was raised for the first. The fare system works fine for me. If somebody has proof that the current method poses a safety hazard, please cite the source.

    It would be nice to have wi-fi when I’m traveling between cities, which I frequently have to do for work.

    in reply to: Ground Zero Mosque #1096780
    haifagirl
    Participant

    . . .and almost into the Pentagon. . . .

    Several religious “junkies” hopped on three planes and forced them to be crashed into three thousand of our loved ones.

    They actually did crash into the Pentagon. And there were four planes. The only reason the fourth plane didn’t crash somewhere in Washington (presumably the White House or Capitol) was because the passengers fought with the hijackers and crashed the plane in Pennsylvania.

    in reply to: egged puts passengers convenience before their safety? #784238
    haifagirl
    Participant

    I’m extremely confused.

    According to the OP, wi-fi will be offered on intercity buses. The drivers are very rarely collecting fares while driving on those buses. And what that has to do with wi-fi still escapes me.

    And while we are on the subject, does anyone have any knowledge of Egged’s safety record? Are we just guessing that fare collecting is a problem, or do we have some information to back it up?

    in reply to: Cell phones for children (or parents) #693607
    haifagirl
    Participant

    Interesting that some people here don’t think it’s a safety issue. Many years ago (more than I care to admit) I had a friend whose older sister was taking a class at night and had to drive to and from school. There was no such thing as cell phones in those days. Her parents did not like the idea of her being alone at night so they got a CB radio for the car so she could contact them if the car broke down or if anything happened. If nothing else, if gave the parents peace of mind.

    Many years ago (not as many as the first story) I was driving home late at night. My car broke down. There were no cell phones in those days either. I was not in the greatest neighborhood, and there were no payphones to be found. Luckily there was a residential hotel and the people were nice enough to let me use their phone otherwise I would have been stranded.

    I got my first cell phone several years ago when my father a”h was living with me. If he needed to contact me, I wanted him to be able to. Without a cell phone how would he reach me when I was in the car or at a student’s home? (Don’t say he could have called me at their house. It wouldn’t have been fair to make a man in his 80s have to keep track of my schedule.)

    Finally, one day I was in a cell phone store getting my boss’s cell phone repaired. There was a man their (not frum) buying his son a cell phone as a bar mitzvah present. I must admit I thought it was ridiculous for a kid that age to have a cell phone. I thought it was ridiculous until I heard the father say, “Now we’ll be able to talk to each other without your mother’s interference.”

    There are many reasons to have cell phones. If you don’t want one, don’t have one. If you don’t want YOUR children to have one, don’t get them one. But please don’t impose your made-up chumrahs on others.

    in reply to: Discrimination Against Baalei Teshuva #1035410
    haifagirl
    Participant

    I cringed at the headline but the OP made me shutter.

    Did you really? Totally close down? Wow! Quite a reaction. At most, I would have expected a shudder.

    in reply to: Discrimination Against Baalei Teshuva #1035409
    haifagirl
    Participant

    First of all, in regards to shidduchim, you have to be comfortable with the person you are marrying. If you aren’t going to be comfortable with a BT, don’t do it. Same thing if you are a BT and you aren’t going to be comfortable with an FFB.

    I had an FFB friend (she’s now happily married to another FFB) who told me when she was dating that she would never marry a BT. My response to her was, “Aren’t glad your father didn’t feel that way?”

    in reply to: Have You Ever Googled Yourself? #686146
    haifagirl
    Participant

    I’ve googled myself. I was surprised to find so much stuff, but I shouldn’t have been. I have had some stuff (mostly letters to the editor) published, and I have been active in politics. What was interesting, however, was unless I added the elected office I held as part of the search, it didn’t come up.

    in reply to: Hilarious School Pranks #1228951
    haifagirl
    Participant

    Is that the only obvious mistake you noticed?

    Are you referring to the poor punctuation, the run-on sentence and the misplaced modifier?

    in reply to: Double Parking #720661
    haifagirl
    Participant

    And unless the city won’t do something drastic, pple just won’t change…

    You’re right. The city should do something drastic . . . remove all the traffic signs and signals. In cities in Europe where they have experimented with the removal of traffic signs and signals, based on the the theories of Hans Monderman, they have found that the rate of accidents are reduced and drivers start behaving better.

    in reply to: Kitniyos #1105395
    haifagirl
    Participant

    When a friend of mine got engaged to a Sefardi she asked our rabbi about having me over on Pesach and he said she should keep one or two pots separate for non-kitniyos.

    in reply to: Yom Tov & Divorce…. #682394
    haifagirl
    Participant

    Yanky55:

    I support your decision, no matter what it is.

    As someone who is quite experienced in doing a seder by myself, I can tell you from my experience the hardest part is dealing with all the people who either a) pity me, or b) try to make me feel guilty.

    I would much rather be alone at a seder that goes at my pace, and follows my minhagim, than to be a seder with other people who give me a hard time for drinking wine instead of grape juice, or for drinking the entire cup, or for eating a full shiur of matzah, or for wanting to wash for urchatz. And yes, these things all really happened, and all in frum homes.

    in reply to: Pesach "Excuses" #866224
    haifagirl
    Participant

    Several years ago, a few days before Pesach, I went out to eat (didn’t want to ruin all my hard work in the kitchen) and ran into a woman I know. While we were discussing our Pesach plans, she mentioned that she was spending it with her parents, and was a bit disappointed.

    “I was really looking forward this year to doing it the [edited] way, really suffering. But my mom can’t live without her [don’t remember the brand] cakes.”

    I thought she really had the wrong idea there. If Pesach is about suffering, where is the simchas yom tov?

    in reply to: Yom Tov & Divorce…. #682381
    haifagirl
    Participant

    I’ve been to families for sedarim. I’ve done sedarim alone.

    I was very fortunate to find a family that does a great seder and once I found them I went to them for every seder.

    Now I’m in a new city. And I remember my experiences before I found that family and how many really, really bad sedarim I had to endure. This year I’m doing my seder alone.

    in reply to: The Riddle Thread…. #1068943
    haifagirl
    Participant

    The Wally Test

    1. Write your name in the square provided. What square?

    2. Take two apples from five apples. How many do you have? 2

    3. Do they have a Fourth of July in England? Yes

    4. If you had only one match and entered a dark room containing an oil lamp, a

    newspaper, and some kindling wood, what would you light first? the match

    5. A farmer had 17 sheep. All but 9 died. How many did he have left? 9

    6. How many animals of each species did Moses take into the Ark? None

    7. A plane full of English tourists flies from Holland to Spain. It crashes in France.

    Where should the survivors be buried? Nowhere, unless you’re really sadistic.

    8. If a redhouse is made of red wood and a whitehouse is made of white wood, what

    is a greenhouse made of? glass

    9. If Mr. Jones’ peacock laid an egg in Mr. Brown=s garden, who is the rightful

    owner of the egg? The National Enquirer! Peacock’s can’t lay eggs.

    10. Mrs. Taylor’s bungalow is decorated entirely in pink. Her lamps, wall, carpets,

    and ceilings are all pink. What color are her stairs? Depends on how you define bungalow. In some cities bungalows have stairs.

    11. If you drive a bus with 42 people on board from Boston to Washington, D.C.,

    and drop off 3 people at each of six stops and pick up 4 people at half the stops,

    when you arrive at Washington 10 hours later what is the driver’s name? Don’t want to violate the anonymity of the CR. Sorry.

    12. Write this down as one number: 15 thousand, 15 hundred and 15. 16,015

    13. What do Kermit the frog and Attila the Hun have in common? Their middle name.

    14. What do you sit on, sleep on, and brush your teeth with? oomis said “hand” and that’s what I was thinking, too.

    15. How many times can you take 3 from 25? I think this is a trick question and it’s after midnight and my brain has already shut down, but I’m going to say 1?

    in reply to: Helping Man up with a Carriage #681589
    haifagirl
    Participant

    When all else fails, ask. So I did. And here’s the answer I got from my rav:

    Of course a Jew should assist another Jew! I don’t remember any commentators saying that a man/woman is patur from the mitzvah aseh of azov tazov!

    So I guess that means I get the guy who has good middos AND follows halacha. And volvie gets what?

    in reply to: Helping Man up with a Carriage #681586
    haifagirl
    Participant

    the guy who “politely states that according to his Rosh Yeshiva, it wouldn’t be proper” is the one I would want as a son or son-in-law.

    And I am grateful you are neither my father nor my shadchan. I’ll take the guy with the good middos.

    in reply to: Helping Man up with a Carriage #681569
    haifagirl
    Participant

    I would be amazed if the halachah was anything other than to help. I’d love for someone to find a source in either case.

    in reply to: Helping Man up with a Carriage #681561
    haifagirl
    Participant

    Is that the same question as a man not helping a woman who’s drowning? I believe he is called a pious fool.

    Tznius doesn’t enter into it. A Jew needs help, so you help him.

    in reply to: Happy PI Day! #1228701
    haifagirl
    Participant

    Wow. “The New Math.” Haven’t heard that song in years. Really brings me back.

    I’m not sure I ever heard “The Menu Song,” but I just listened to it. Not his best work in my opinion.

    My favorite will probably always be “The Elements.” But he’s got a lot of good stuff.

    in reply to: Should Girls go to Rallies? #681758
    haifagirl
    Participant

    Don’t give Volvie a hard time. He has who to rely on. Rambam said women should leave the house only once, or at most twice, a month.

    in reply to: The Riddle Thread…. #1068932
    haifagirl
    Participant

    I have a headache, so I may not be thinking too clearly, but isn’t that a straight line along the y-axis?

    in reply to: Number of Participants in the Coffee Room #921533
    haifagirl
    Participant

    HIE: Read back a few posts. It looks as if we’re looking for 42.

    in reply to: CHANGE YOUR CLOCKS TONIGHT #681487
    haifagirl
    Participant

    Not here. We like to keep our afikomen at a reasonable hour. 🙂

    in reply to: Number of Participants in the Coffee Room #921525
    haifagirl
    Participant

    from d a: Did kapusta take 35? If not, the.nurse can’t take 36 and areivimzehlazeh can’t take 37!

    from kapusta: nurse, just for that, you’ll have to buy your own birthday present. Sorry :-/

    It seems to me that kapusta gave a de facto acceptance of 35. Therefore areivimzehlazeh is really 37.

    in reply to: Do we Need Some New Laws? #682573
    haifagirl
    Participant

    cigarettes are over 7 dollars a pack (perhaps 10 dollars in some places, up to half of that price (or more?) is just for taxes.

    The mob can sell them at half price and make a bundle.

    Which brings up another good point. We tax things we DON’T want people to have: cigarettes, alcohol, income . . .

    in reply to: Do we Need Some New Laws? #682572
    haifagirl
    Participant

    Drugs impair people and under the inlfuence they harm to others.

    One example is that case of the Jewish guy who was just executed in Florida and many

    excused him saying “It’s not his fault it was the drugs, he was on”.

    .

    One could make the very same argument about alcohol. Why should narcotics be different in this regard? Or are you in favor of prohibition as well?;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

    Alcohol has legitimate uses such a swine on Shabbos and Pesach.

    drughs like Cocaine have no legitimate use.

    Wrong! Cocaine is used medicinally.

    in reply to: A Sad Commentary #681480
    haifagirl
    Participant

    I also say “hello” (or more likely, “shalom”) to everyone I interact with. And I say “thank you.”

    I have a couple friends in a different neighborhood, so when I got on the bus to take shalach manos to them I handed a shalach manos package to the bus driver. He didn’t know how to react. Apparently I was the only person who realized he had to work on Purim.

    in reply to: A Sad Commentary #681477
    haifagirl
    Participant

    So, yes, Jews being nice to each other apparently is amazing!

    And that is the saddest commentary of all.

    in reply to: A Sad Commentary #681476
    haifagirl
    Participant

    Haifagirl, so they’re not using “amazing” the way it is defined in the dictionary. It’s become slang for something beautiful.

    There are two parts to communication: 1) sending a message and 2) receiving a message. If the message you send is unclear you can’t blame the receiver for not understanding.

    Abraham Lincoln once asked some people, “How many legs does a dog have?” Of course they answered, “four.” Then he asked, “What about if we call the tail a leg?” Then they changed their answer to “five.”

    He replied, “The dog still has four legs. You can call the tail a leg, but that doesn’t change the facts.”

    So you want to use “amazing” to mean “beautiful.” Can I also choose different meanings for words?

    in reply to: Do we Need Some New Laws? #682565
    haifagirl
    Participant

    a. Such cases are few and far between. Seat belts save vastly more lives than they may cost.

    b. People thrown from vehicles still become projectiles and can injure other people and themselves.

    I agree with you 100%. However, if you tell someone to buckle up, and he responds by telling you he was in an accident and walked away ONLY because he wasn’t wearing his seat belt, and therefore doesn’t want to use one now, how would you respond?

    in reply to: Do we Need Some New Laws? #682564
    haifagirl
    Participant

    In a nutshell you are arguing that narcotics — i.e. crack and cocaine — would result in no negative consequence to society if legalized and made freely available to all?

    I’m sure haifagirl will present some thoughtful comments on the matter.

    She’s probably sleeping right now.

    Thank you 80 for the compliment. Actually, I wasn’t sleeping, I was at a shiur.

    Now, to the other comment. Nobody ever claimed there would be no negative consequences. However, as we learned from Prohibition and its subsequent repeal, the negative consequences of making substances illegal is far worse than the negative consequences of making them legal.

    There would be no more (or not many more) negative consequences to society than there are currently from alcohol, tobacco, and all kinds of other legal substances.

    And I think Wolf did a fine job of explaining the economic benefits, so I don’t have to.

    in reply to: Do we Need Some New Laws? #682556
    haifagirl
    Participant

    The libertarian approach would be to legalize marijuana, crack and cocaine too for all people – adult and minors.

    When was the last time you saw a bootlegger?

    Let’s have a little history lesson.

    In 1919 the government of the United States banned the manufacture, sale, and transportation of alcohol. They did this by amending the Constitution, which is the only proper way to do such an act.

    John D. Rockefeller was one of the proponents of Prohibition. In 1932 he said, “When Prohibition was introduced, I hoped that it would be widely supported by public opinion and the day would soon come when the evil effects of alcohol would be recognized. I have slowly and reluctantly come to believe that this has not been the result. Instead, drinking has generally increased; the speakeasy has replaced the saloon; a vast army of lawbreakers has appeared; many of our best citizens have openly ignored Prohibition; respect for the law has been greatly lessened; and crime has increased to a level never seen before.”

    He, along with most of the country, realized what a big mistake Prohibition turned out to be. In 1933 the Constitution was amended again to repeal Prohibition. Crime went down. Markedly.

    In 1930 the Federal Bureau of Narcotics was created as a division of the Treasury Department. Harry J. Anslinger was named as its director. He was in favor of marijuana prohibition, but not for reasons you might imagine. He reasons were primarily racial:

    “There are 100,000 total marijuana smokers in the US, and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos, and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz, and swing, result from marijuana use. This marijuana causes white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers, and any others.”

    In fact, at a hearing in 1937, Dr. William C. Woodward, a doctor, lawyer and Chief Counsel to the AMA said, “The American Medical Association knows of no evidence that marijuana is a dangerous drug.”

    Despite Dr. Woodward’s testimony, marijuana became illegal, without benefit of a Constitutional amendment.

    In 1969 President Richard Nixon declared a “War on Drugs.”

    Now, more than 1 million people are arrested in American each year for drug offenses, most of which are non-violent. If the currently-illegal drugs were obtainable at your local pharmacy, there would be no need for people to make them at home, and sell them on street corners and in front of schools. The quality would most likely go up and the price down. With drugs legal and more easily affordable, people who are addicted would be able to get treatment without fear of arrest. They would be able to buy their drugs without having to resort to theft to get enough money for the currently inflated prices.

    There would be no drug turf wars, just as there are no alcohol turf wars anymore. So gang violence would be reduced, as it was with the repeal of Prohibition.

    There would be additional tax revenue from the legal sale of drugs.

    Now, which part are you against?

    in reply to: Good Forwards (Emails) #1059504
    haifagirl
    Participant

    amuboolite is a pretty common word.

    I used to have one of those! I gave it up. I’m much happier without it. I love Egged!

    in reply to: Good Forwards (Emails) #1059502
    haifagirl
    Participant

    This sentence took me quite a while to figure out, and I still can’t figure out the last word. Any help? And in terms of the hypothesis, I think it needs to be pretty common words that people will automatically recognize rather than very hard words like these.

    The last word was obfuscated.

    As to your comment about it needing to be pretty common words, the “study” cited did not say common words (cleaned up):

    I’m sorry you don’t think hypothesis or obfuscated are common words. I guess we hang out in different circles.

    And further, I can’t believe somebody at Cambridge University would use what when the proper word is which!

    in reply to: A Sad Commentary #681473
    haifagirl
    Participant

    love is one of the most beautiful things to see and experience and when people see it they are touched.

    Yes, love is beautiful and touching. But is it amazing?

    causing great surprise or sudden wonder.

    in reply to: Do we Need Some New Laws? #682554
    haifagirl
    Participant

    oomis: What would you say to those people whose lives were saved only because they were thrown from a vehicle in an accident?

    (Remember, I do wear mine, and I encourage others to do so, but I have heard of several cases of people who would have ended up UNDER the vehicle if they hadn’t been thrown out.)

    in reply to: Do we Need Some New Laws? #682549
    haifagirl
    Participant

    There is a reason the Torah outlaws activities. We sometimes (often) don’t know the reason.

    But there is a world of difference between a law made by an Omniscient Being Who knows what’s best for us and a law made a group of men who THINK they know what’s best for us.

    in reply to: Learning Hebrew Beyond The Basics #681450
    haifagirl
    Participant

    I would hate to violate the CR rules by posting a web site. However, you can Google Ulpan Or.

    in reply to: Do we Need Some New Laws? #682546
    haifagirl
    Participant

    And by the way, just for the record, I do wear my seatbelt. Although I don’t drive, I wear it whenever possible as a passenger. Even on the bus.

    in reply to: Do we Need Some New Laws? #682545
    haifagirl
    Participant

    Laws should be used ONLY for the purpose of protecting our rights.

    How does my driving without a seatbelt infringe on your rights?

    And a quick story about underage drinking laws. Actually, about selling alcohol, not necessarily drinking it.

    I worked with a woman who had been married for a little while (not years, but several months). She and her husband and been trying and trying and trying to have children and so far they had been unsuccessful. Whenever they heard of a segula for having children they tried it. She heard about one segula, and while I don’t remember all the details, it involved drinking a certain type of wine. She had her sister-in-law get the wine for her. Because although this woman was an adult and married, she was only 19 and therefore was not allowed to buy wine.

    Does that make any sense?

    in reply to: Do we Need Some New Laws? #682542
    haifagirl
    Participant

    There should be some kind of a consequence for those who don’t follow.

    And who would ENFORCE the consequences? And if you tried to resist the enforcement?

    in reply to: Do we Need Some New Laws? #682538
    haifagirl
    Participant

    Sorry, I was busy the last couple days.

    The point was that someone made a comment in another post that there should be a law requiring people to learn CPR. Should there? Do you want armed police officers (yes, some people tend to forget that police officers carry guns) asking to see your CPR certification?

    What about laws restricting what we do ON OUR OWN private property. There are now laws in several areas restricting smoking on private property. Should the government be able to tell you what you can and cannot do on your own property?

    And now the federal government is trying to make new laws about health insurance. They want to REQUIRE everyone to buy insurance or pay a fine. Bill Gates can probably afford any medical procedure he may eventually need. Why should he be required to buy insurance?

    And these are just some of the issues facing society today in regard to laws.

Viewing 50 posts - 901 through 950 (of 1,523 total)