Grandmaster

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 101 through 150 (of 298 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Black hats #751701
    Grandmaster
    Member

    I took Kent’s comment to mean the recent innovation of not wearing a head-covering to shul is unprecedented.

    in reply to: zeeskite – r u ok? #752043
    Grandmaster
    Member

    I think onegoal misspoke one her first comment above and didn’t mean what it sounded like.

    in reply to: Touchy Subjects #755568
    Grandmaster
    Member

    s2021: Aren’t you also a divorced woman?

    in reply to: How would you react? #752067
    Grandmaster
    Member

    Isn’t there an issue preparing on Shabbos for something occurring after Shabbos? Would going to there Shabbos mincha time to hear megilla on Motzei Shabbos be a problem?

    in reply to: Brocha on Gum? #751886
    Grandmaster
    Member

    Don’t you swallow the sugar (or whatever the taste is coming) from the gum? So it would seem to require a brocha rishona but perhaps not a bracha achrona since it is almost certainly less than a kzayis.

    For the aforementioned reason (probably amongst others) you can only chew kosher gum.

    in reply to: Kosher beach? #751305
    Grandmaster
    Member

    How does that alleviate the clinging/tightness issue that the water causes.

    in reply to: The Riddle Thread…. #1069522
    Grandmaster
    Member

    (eclipse, reposted from the other thread)

    eclipse

    The Human

    Define “shave themselves” please.

    1.they need a barber to attend to them?

    2.they themselves are not barbers?

    3.I’m totally off…?

    POSTED 1 MINUTE AGO #

    Define “shave themselves” please. – The simple meaning.

    1. See above. Some shave themselves, some by attending the barber.

    2. No. There is only one barber in town, as mentioned above.

    in reply to: Out of control $ spending #751322
    Grandmaster
    Member
    in reply to: Kosher beach? #751282
    Grandmaster
    Member

    No, since they aren’t a lifeguard. (Besides, even a male lifeguard isn’t permissible.)

    in reply to: I think of death a lot. Do you? why is it so ignored? #751070
    Grandmaster
    Member

    Are you thinking in the first person?

    in reply to: Mother Theresa And Bikur Cholim (l'havdil…) #751788
    Grandmaster
    Member

    I guess she was ugly.

    in reply to: 'jewish' songs with non jewish tunes #752211
    Grandmaster
    Member

    but not bad enough to turn somebody into a complete rasha.

    On its own. But who knows what path it may lead one down.

    in reply to: Kosher beach? #751280
    Grandmaster
    Member

    When I went there years ago the only people around were the park rangers and sheriff’s deputies doing occasional patrols.

    Park rangers and sheriff’s are no different than a member of the public in this regard.

    in reply to: The Riddle Thread…. #1069521
    Grandmaster
    Member

    The town has just one barber and he is male; and every man in the town keeps himself clean-shaven: some by shaving themselves, some by attending the barber.

    in reply to: Kosher beach? #751279
    Grandmaster
    Member

    Doesn’t whatever is worn in the water cling, or becomes tight, to the body?

    in reply to: Mother Theresa And Bikur Cholim (l'havdil…) #751779
    Grandmaster
    Member

    I would say Sarah Imanu had very good midos despite her great beauty.

    in reply to: Kosher beach? #751275
    Grandmaster
    Member

    Aren’t t-shirts, by definition, short sleeve (or close to it)?

    in reply to: The Riddle Thread…. #1069520
    Grandmaster
    Member

    In a village, the barber shaves everyone who does not shave himself, but no one else.

    Who shaves the barber?

    in reply to: Out of control $ spending #751319
    Grandmaster
    Member

    If you can answer this riddle, I’ll reconsider:

    If the barber can only shave those in the village that don’t shave themselves, then who shaves the barber?

    in reply to: Kosher beach? #751271
    Grandmaster
    Member

    I don’t see how women can go there in swim gear if men (even non-Jewish) may see them there.

    in reply to: Out of control $ spending #751317
    Grandmaster
    Member

    I only keep friends who are fellow Mensa members.

    in reply to: Kosher beach? #751268
    Grandmaster
    Member

    No men see those beaches?

    in reply to: single guy and single girl talkin about shidduchim #911475
    Grandmaster
    Member

    This sounds like dangerous territory.

    in reply to: Out of control $ spending #751315
    Grandmaster
    Member

    That’s still too cheap for my taste. Do you at least have a chauffeur drive you around in a limo? Anything less is not classy enough.

    in reply to: awesome A1C level #753138
    Grandmaster
    Member

    What’s A1C?

    in reply to: Out of control $ spending #751313
    Grandmaster
    Member

    chshapiro – Why are you such a cheapskate looking for a cheap hotel?? When I travel to Europe, I would never dream of staying in a hotel less luxurious than The Ritz.

    in reply to: Guy and Girls on Purim #751939
    Grandmaster
    Member

    mbachur: Men don’t need their wife’s approval to do a mitzvah.

    in reply to: Kosher beach? #751263
    Grandmaster
    Member

    Can’t the people living in the nearby houses (or possibly passerby’s) in Sea Gate see the people on the beach?

    in reply to: Guy and Girls on Purim #751934
    Grandmaster
    Member

    By many Bnei Torah, a husband will not call his wife by her first name if non immediate family is around.

    in reply to: Tznius- Not black and white (and red all over). #751387
    Grandmaster
    Member

    Assuming it is pikuach nefesh. If the baby will otherwise starve, I hear the point.

    in reply to: Black hats #751690
    Grandmaster
    Member

    mw13: Your comments are all well stated and on the button.

    in reply to: Guy and Girls on Purim #751924
    Grandmaster
    Member

    Purim is no excuse for that crude vulgar behavior.

    in reply to: When young adult leaves to be Frei #776741
    Grandmaster
    Member

    The GRA declared in his commentary on Laws of Avodah Zarah that even the Rambam has had certain of his Torah positions corrupted due to the influence of his secular studies in philosophy.

    in reply to: makom kavua in shul #751564
    Grandmaster
    Member

    If he’s late for shul, he lost his seat. Guests don’t have to stand the entire davening because any seat might have a regular occupant – who might show up at any late hour of the tefila.

    in reply to: Tzedaka for the Rich #751117
    Grandmaster
    Member

    If available communal Tzedaka funds are insufficient and unable to cover all halachicly required tzedaka necessities, I don’t disagree that triaging is necessary, with someone lacking bread and water taking priority over someone who lost his affluence.

    in reply to: Out of control $ spending #751308
    Grandmaster
    Member

    You sound like a normal girl.

    in reply to: Guy and Girls on Purim #751915
    Grandmaster
    Member

    Calling by the first name or asking out? Those are two different things. The former is bad, but might be excusable on Purim. (Might be, I’m not sure.) The latter is wrong anytime (even not in public).

    in reply to: When the MODS fall asleep…… #1209530
    Grandmaster
    Member

    How about do some work?

    in reply to: Is This Lying? #751201
    Grandmaster
    Member

    How tall is he?

    in reply to: younger sublings getting engaged before older #752016
    Grandmaster
    Member

    This should be a last resort. Some rabbonim are very much against it barring strong extenuating circumstances. That being said, if it is necessary, he/she should ask permission/mechilla. Perhaps their ought to be a certain amount of reluctance/embarrassment involved.

    in reply to: In lieu of… #931693
    Grandmaster
    Member

    Matanas L’evyonim and Shalach Manos are seperate mitzvos. Keep the terminology in order rather than confuse the two.

    in reply to: Black hats #751673
    Grandmaster
    Member

    ItcheSrulik: He would alienate the non hatters if he avoided them being the Shatz. And that would result in them possibly not attending shiur. He may feel its not worth the trade-off, even if less than ideal.

    AOM: Reread my comment. The bathing suit remark was a hypothetical comparison.

    in reply to: When young adult leaves to be Frei #776729
    Grandmaster
    Member

    From what you are saying, you agree we can treat as “halachicly true” (love that term) what Chazal said, even if it has emperically proven to be false. For example the famous “lice” case, where we “know” the opposite of what Chazal said (lice grow from nothing): We either re-interpet Chazal to conform with known facts, or are Machmir as such (since it is well known Chazal did speak in allegory) while considering the other side as well.

    Rav Breil, the Rebbi of the Pachad Yiztchok, teaches us that we do not even entertain the possibility of a statement in Chazal not coming from the Torah. This we see from Rav Briel’s answer to the Pachad Yiztchok’s question regarding the killing of lice on Shabbos. The Gemora permits it, based on a scientific fact. The Pachad Yiztchok asked his Rebbi that due to the possibility that this scientific fact is incorrect, perhaps we should be machmir and not kill lice on Shabbos, just in case.

    in reply to: Tzedaka for the Rich #751113
    Grandmaster
    Member

    DY:

    Reread the comment, and notice any more “obligation”. 1) The response was to it being allegedly an “obligation” to decline, not merely “praiseworthy”. 2) The response (“any more”) was that it is the same praiseworthiness for the formerly rich fellow to decline tzedaka as for the traditionally poor fellow to do so.

    2qwerty:

    Even a poor fellow often can make do without tzedaka. It indeed may be a hardship*, but unless he literally has no bread and water or shelter (in which case I agree with you) he can survive.

    * much as it is to a formerly rich fellow to live far below the standards he is used to – which is the reason for the aforementioned halacha.

    in reply to: Tzedaka for the Rich #751107
    Grandmaster
    Member

    Considering the aforementioned halacha, I don’t see why the formerly rich person would have any more “obligation” to not accept the tzedaka than a poor person should not accept tzedaka.

    in reply to: Engagement #752315
    Grandmaster
    Member

    walton157: That argument might be for longer dating times, not longer engagements. Once they are engaged to be married, they are already engaged and made their marital partner decision already. As far as dating times, there are many very strong arguments why it should be shorter, but that is another topic for an appropriate thread. Here the discussion is appropriate contact and length of engagement, not dating.

    in reply to: Tzedaka for the Rich #751105
    Grandmaster
    Member

    I agree with you aries2756. So does halacha.

    in reply to: Engagement #752305
    Grandmaster
    Member

    It is best, and most healthy, to strictly limit contact. It is also helpful to have as short as possible engagement, unless you have almost no contact.

    in reply to: Black hats #751656
    Grandmaster
    Member

    Not once has he asked the baal tefila to put on a hat.

    He knows his customers. Why should he chase some away by asking them to put on a hat?

    Then I came to realize that THOSE were the clothes that, for them, were their good, SPECIAL Shabbat clothes (as opposed to the navy blue work shirts and pants most guys wore during the week. So, my point is, it is a matter of intention, of kavana, what makes you dressed appropriately, dressed Jewishly. On kibbutz, the clothes I described, along with a nice bright, clean kippah seruga (as opposed to the ones that get dirty looking from working in them all week) is JUST AS Shabbas’dik as a gold striped kapota and streimel for a Yerushalmi, or an 800 dollar suit and a new Borsalino for someone in Flatbush.

    Really? So if they run around in their bathing suit all week, but “l’kovod Shabbos” they put on a Gucci T-Shirt and shorts, its just as good as a suit and tie and black hat, since it is the “intention” that counts?

    in reply to: Tzedaka for the Rich #751102
    Grandmaster
    Member

    (Whether he should sell or not is a different issue.)

    Why would you even consider the possibility that he should sell his house, considering the aforementioned halacha that he should be supported to live at his original standard of living?

Viewing 50 posts - 101 through 150 (of 298 total)