Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
gavra_at_workParticipant
Lilmod:
You have two statement that seem to contradict each other…
1. When I said that it’s untznius, I did not mean that it’s assur. To my knowledge, it’s not assur. I merely meant that if you are asking about it, I would certainly say that it is a higher level of tznius not to wear it.
2. If it’s not assur, why assume that nail polish is untznius?
So why do you say black is “not Tznius” if you agree it isn’t Assur?
gavra_at_workParticipantF) Rabbi Haskel Lookstein
gavra_at_workParticipantMy LOR says I shouldn’t be wearing nail polish at all.
There you go.
Speaking of Tznius, did you ask your LOR if you should be braiding your hair as well?
December 5, 2016 6:55 pm at 6:55 pm in reply to: when do we start saying vsan tal umatar this year #1196807gavra_at_workParticipantWould be great if someone would come forward and explain the variations in the calculation for v’sein tal u’matar.
See Rav Moshe’s explanation.
http://www.hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=920&st=&pgnum=33
gavra_at_workParticipantlilmod ulelamaid – You already said this isn’t an “Assur” type issue. To quote from above:
2. When I said that it’s untznius, I did not mean that it’s assur. To my knowledge, it’s not assur. I merely meant that if you are asking about it, I would certainly say that it is a higher level of tznius not to wear it.
So once again, who says nail polish is Tznius?
gavra_at_workParticipantYou make the assumption that any color nail polish is “Tznius”.
Why is any nail polish “Tznius”? And if it is, why is black different?
gavra_at_workParticipantThe maaleh of being single and female! I can sleep whenever I want to!
Don’t mean to burst a bubble, but that is like saying the maaleh of being a Goy is that you can eat a cheeseburger.
Also relevant is the Gemorah in Gitten 12B & 13A.
gavra_at_workParticipantShould have not included the picture, but how can a “frum” company distribute pictures of women that are not Tznius?
Like I saw commented elsewhere, this is a Pashut Tiufta (fatal flaw) in the Kuzari argument for Har Sinai.
gavra_at_workParticipantlilmod ulelamaid – Thanks. To fully disclose, we did lein it for the Haftorah of Lech Lecha week before last.
gavra_at_workParticipant“We try to pass a smile, be supportive, give a lift, inject energy… ??? ?? ???? ??????, ?????? ???? ???!!”.
Have to admit this goes well with the Dec. 25th Giyores thread.
Also the workers in Boro Park are being Mekayem the next Pasuk….
?????????? ?????? ???-?????, ???????? ????????? ???-?????? ??????; ????? ???????? ???? ????, ?????????????? ???????????? ??? ???????.
November 21, 2016 6:36 pm at 6:36 pm in reply to: Converting to Judaism, how do I explain to family about Xmas? #1193159gavra_at_workParticipantDon’t listen to anything Joseph says. Ask your Rabbi.
Second.
November 16, 2016 5:38 pm at 5:38 pm in reply to: what if i think my bashert might not be what im looking for? #1192182gavra_at_workParticipantyeshivishhock – Decide if you are better off alone or with this guy who you know, and have much in common.
Chazal say “Tav L’meitan”, which means that women want to be married, and are better off being married.
I’ve heard there are two methods of dating, the Achashvairosh method, and the Bitachon method. The Achashvairosh method means that you check out everyone until you have everything you want, and the Bitachon method means that you look for the big things, and have Bitachon that the RBSO will care for the rest.
My red lines were Halacha, a supportive spouse and dedicated mother, able to stand up for herself mentally and intellectually, and not into Gashmius. I missed out on some things others would deem mandatory (ex. Kollel in EY for a few years), but it was well worth it. Your red lines may be different.
By saying he is a “great guy” means that you respect and like him. If I were you, I would do some self searching to see where my “red lines” were, and go out on a date (keeping informal contact is a horrid idea) and ask the tough questions. Otherwise even if you do marry someone else, you may always self-question.
Hatzlacha.
gavra_at_workParticipantHere I thought the thread was about the woman who kissed Arafat’s wife.
gavra_at_workParticipantiacisrmma – Jennings Bryan also tried for the election in ’08 and didn’t get nominated, AND lost the Scopes trial (in the eyes of public opinion if not the jury). Adlai Stevenson got to deliver one of the best lines in the history of the UN to Valerian Zorin during the Cuban missile crisis.
gavra_at_workParticipantoh no, she is quite dead. This second botched coronation will be her last, and she will go down in the history books as the biggest loser to ever try (oh so hard) to be POTUS. She couldn’t even bring herself to give a concession speech.
1: Hillary is not Haman, about whom we say “V’atah al bamosainu tidroch”.
2: William Jennings Bryan lost the presidency as his party’s candidate twice (hence the “biggest loser”), and was still chosen as Secretary of State by Wilson. Perhaps Hillary will be sent as the ambassador to Outer Mongolia (a fate worse than jail).
gavra_at_workParticipantI remember reading about an old Yerushalmi who had a well in his backyard and no electricity so that he should not get any services whatsoever from the Zionists.
So there are such people out there.
September 13, 2016 8:40 pm at 8:40 pm in reply to: Why Brooklyn Bais Yaakovs Need Unity Now #1178828gavra_at_workParticipantThere are multiple organizations, people and schools that will make it happen if the reason for exclusion is because the parents cannot afford tuition,.
On the other hand, people who buck the schools’ policies and constantly holler that the school’s are strictly “holier than thou” will have a problem getting children into school because the schools know that they will be fighting a losing battle trying to teach children whose parents are doing the utmost to undo the school’s work.
Agree fully. That being said, some parents are still “bayshnim” and are willing to sacrifice in their own way in order to teach their own children and not have to take others’ Tzedaka.
September 13, 2016 8:31 pm at 8:31 pm in reply to: Why Brooklyn Bais Yaakovs Need Unity Now #1178827gavra_at_workParticipantyou know clearly that Joseph did not mean it as “holier than thou”.
Aderaba, knowing Joe, he meant it exactly as such. Had it been almost anyone else I would agree with you. Not Joe, he has a track record.
September 13, 2016 7:54 pm at 7:54 pm in reply to: Why Brooklyn Bais Yaakovs Need Unity Now #1178824gavra_at_workParticipantSyag Lchochma, iacisrmma –
“beggars can’t be choosers” means that the parents are desperate (hence “begging” for their child to get into a school), and therefore can’t hold out for the ideal. If you (or they) took that as saying that the parents in the school or their children are any less deserving of the ideal, please don’t (I didn’t).
Once again, if the best school for these children is Prospect (let’s say), then they can’t demand entry there just because they got messed up by the closure.
September 13, 2016 7:18 pm at 7:18 pm in reply to: Why Brooklyn Bais Yaakovs Need Unity Now #1178821gavra_at_workParticipantWilling to struggle and go through the hardship of making sure your children go to a Yeshiva or Bais Yaakov is not “Showing on the outside that you are holier”.
That is a despicable comment to make.
1: Yes it is. You have no idea what people are going through to call those who can not or will not send to Yeshivos “Not Frum”, unless “Frum” is a pejorative. What about all the people (and I know quite a few) who home school, at least partially due to financial concerns? Are they not “Frum”? Joe is defining “Frum” as “Showing off that I’m holier”.
I certainly don’t disagree with you that struggling to send your children to Yeshiva is a wonderful thing, but it doesn’t define who is or is not religious.
2: Does one have to send to a “heimish Yeshiva or Beis Yaakov” in order to be religious? Joe, by excluding many Shomrei Torah U’Mitzvos who do send to Jewish Day schools or even Yeshivos or Bais Yaakovs that are not sufficiently “heimish” from being “Frum”, has made the word “Frum” into a pejorative.
September 13, 2016 6:01 pm at 6:01 pm in reply to: Why Brooklyn Bais Yaakovs Need Unity Now #1178819gavra_at_workParticipantThe situation with Oz Vehador was not the FAULT of the parents but the Administration. They DID NOT inform the parents about the closure until August 29. Do you think the parents would not have been looking for a school in July and August had they been told that there is a good chance the school was closing? Don’t have the chutzpah to make such a statement when the parents were not informed.
Nice rant, but I don’t get the Shaychus at all. The parents are looking for a school, due to no fault of their own (let’s say). They still can’t afford to be “choosy”. Or do you think they should be allowed to out for Prospect, Rav Meir, or whichever school is “top” just because it wasn’t their fault?
I don’t get your point.
September 13, 2016 5:38 pm at 5:38 pm in reply to: Why Brooklyn Bais Yaakovs Need Unity Now #1178818gavra_at_workParticipantBy frum I mean any type of family that desires to send their children to a heimish Yeshiva or Beis Yaakov.
Hence “Frum” as a pejorative. Not Shomrei Torah U’Mitzvos, but someone who shows on the outside that they are holier.
September 13, 2016 1:58 pm at 1:58 pm in reply to: Why Brooklyn Bais Yaakovs Need Unity Now #1178813gavra_at_workParticipantWhat if the parents are dirt poor (and working)?
Then do the same thing. Raise money for specific merit scholarships, and award them to specific children. It is already done many times over outside the “Frum” world.
I don’t think anyone would be against scholarships for people who struggle edited/replaced and just can’t support themselves, no matter how hard they try.
September 13, 2016 1:12 pm at 1:12 pm in reply to: Why Brooklyn Bais Yaakovs Need Unity Now #1178808gavra_at_workParticipantSo no one is responsible for taking in these girls, but the author is affiliated with a school so it’s his responsibility to take them in?
The Author should try. His school may have a good reason why they didn’t offer, so may other schools.
cjundef – Yasher Koach to you.
I am not sure that parents will want to bus the girls to Far Rockaway.
Beggars can’t be choosers.
If a girl doesn’t have a school, it’s considered pikuach nefesh. Everyone who is able to help has an obligation to do so.
Where are the parents? (if there are any. Of course a Yesomah would be the responsibility of the community, as much as the concept of a community does not exist today. People would raise funds for specific children who have no one to take care of them.)
gavra_at_workParticipantJoe/Health – Redleg has an interesting point. We know the Halacha when you have two people drowning, that you save one (Kohen, Talmid Chacham, male, etc.) first. It is logical that the dynamic/halachic considerations changes when looking at a much broader scale (ex. Inquisition) or when there is no Vadai that the unsaved will die. If the child will Vadai die without being saved, and there is a 25% chance that the male will survive without help, should you save the male anyway?
September 12, 2016 6:47 pm at 6:47 pm in reply to: Why Brooklyn Bais Yaakovs Need Unity Now #1178791gavra_at_workParticipantIf it was a new and small school, then it isn’t a big deal. Just like any other businesses, Yeshivas should not be “too big to fail”.
Should yiddishe meidelech go to public school because they are orphans with no parents to pay a full tuition?
Should teachers and their children go hungry because the school couldn’t pay them?
gavra_at_workParticipantbenignuman- you are correct. I don’t know why I translated “Zeroah” as “Thigh” when it should be “arm”.
Thank you.
gavra_at_workParticipantLuL – Thank you for the disclaimer 🙂
I’ll add to your list that Rav Vosner (who is not a maikel by any stretch) allows women to wear snowpants without a skirt. I have quoted it a different time that no one could find me a source.
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/who-says-above-knee-osur?view=all#post-397331
gavra_at_workParticipantits because your suppose to cover your knees with a skirt
That is the question at hand. Do you know why? Do you have a source in Halacha telling you this is true?
September 8, 2016 8:21 pm at 8:21 pm in reply to: Coffee addict post in the news article about Monsey crash #1178013gavra_at_workParticipantI don’t know. Where there signs up saying that the area was a school and people should slow down? It is tragic, but we shouldn’t just throw our hands up, we should do our histadlus so that it doesn’t happen again CV.
Put another way, if there would have been a sign that children are walking in the area, perhaps the person driving would have been more careful. I don’t know if there was such a sign, but please have the Monsey area put one up ASAP if it isn’t there.
September 8, 2016 8:04 pm at 8:04 pm in reply to: Return policy difference based on where you live. #1178108gavra_at_workParticipantWhat if my e-commerce store has a “no returns” policy for people from Detroit, Jackson, Miami Gardens, Birmingham, Baltimore, Memphis, New Orleans, Flint, Montgomery and Savannah?
Legal. It isn’t EEOC or FHA.
gavra_at_workParticipanti said that its NOT okay to show knees period whether or not shes wearing leggings.
I’m a guy, so I don’t get these things, but how does one show knees while wearing leggings? Wouldn’t the leggings cover the knees?
gavra_at_workParticipantThe Mishna in Kesubos lists a couple of such practices but does not include covering legs.
The Gemorah Kesubos there explains “sowing in the marketplace” as one who uncovers her thighs.
gavra_at_workParticipantYou mean I will have to stop driving my Lexus! 🙁
“Trendy and Modern” is showing off and getting people to look at you. Although not under classical “Tznius”, it certainly comes under “Hayznaya Leches”. A fancy/showy car is the same idea.
gavra_at_workParticipantHowever, I would think that if someone is going on a tiyul or bike riding or horseback riding, etc, and she is wearing pants under her skirt, it is okay if her skirts goes above her knees. But again, that is my own assumption, so I may be wrong.
I’m looking for a source one way or the other. Also, if it is OK for a Tiyul, it is probably acceptable for the street as well (as far as the Halacha is concerned).
Thanks
September 8, 2016 3:16 pm at 3:16 pm in reply to: Return policy difference based on where you live. #1178087gavra_at_workParticipantApparently it is known that Frum Jews are exceedingly careful about honesty.
Unfortunately in the business world that is not the case, especially when dealing with those outside of the group.
I agree with you though that the issue is probably benign. My guess is that with large families, they were sending out 8 items and returning 6, which creates an inventory problem for a small business.
gavra_at_workParticipantDressing too trendy or modern is also not tznius
Driving a trendy or modern car like a Lexus is similarly not Tznius.
gavra_at_workParticipantSparkly – Perhaps, but not the question being asked. My question is whether it is not “Tznius” to wear a skirt that does not always cover the knee, but have leggings or pants underneath so that the knee and thigh are always covered.
gavra_at_workParticipantSparkly, I already gave you a very long answer to that question in another thread. In short, they have to be long enough that your knees NEVER show.
What if you are wearing pants or leggings under the skirt?
(I haven’t found a satisfactory answer yet, maybe someone here has one).
September 8, 2016 1:57 pm at 1:57 pm in reply to: Return policy difference based on where you live. #1178077gavra_at_workParticipantI addressed your point, gavra. They specifically chose the most densely Orthodox populated areas, specifically with the intent because those areas are densely Orthodox without them overly affecting non-Orthodox customers. The other towns you cited are less densely Orthodox and have a larger percentage of a non-Orthodox/non-Jewish population.
Passaic? Not even close.
Any judge looking at the list of towns will immediately notice it is specifically targeting Orthodox Jews.
A specific subset, while not targeting other similar Orthodox Jews. Not illegal. That’s even if they specifically targeted Orthodox Jews, vs. specific ZIP Codes irrespective of religion (which would certainly be allowed).
September 8, 2016 1:10 pm at 1:10 pm in reply to: Return policy difference based on where you live. #1178073gavra_at_workParticipanteven though I do think they’re violating U.S. anti-discrimination laws.
I don’t think that the five areas listed create a class. Noting that other heavily Jewish areas such as South Fallsburg, Kew Gardens Hills, the Five Towns, Teaneck, University Heights, West Rogers Park and Pico are not on the list, a judge would have a hard time concluding that there is religious discrimination, even on the basis of location.
September 8, 2016 12:58 am at 12:58 am in reply to: Ladies First – Is it respectful or not? #1178498gavra_at_workParticipantThat doesn’t conform to Rav Miller’s “There cannot be two kings… The wife is submissive… There can be no harmony when there are two commanders…”
I don’t see why not. Please explain yourself.
gavra_at_workParticipantI was under the impression that the Gedolim or Rabbanim there consider it a Mitzvah to vote, but like I said, I’m not 100% sure.
Local elections. For example, there was a Machlokes in Lakewood to vote for Christie (the Rabbonim) or Corzine (BMG) for Governor in NJ. For a presidential election, most people’s votes really don’t matter in either direction.
gavra_at_workParticipantJoseph – I see Rabbi Miller as saying exactly what I said earlier.
The husband is in charge, but he is mechuyav to defer to his wife. That is why the husband always gets the last words:
“Yes Dear”.
gavra_at_workParticipantI may be wrong, but my impression is that the Gedolim consider it important/a Mitzvah to vote.
Mostly in Israel, as it directly affects the money given to Yeshivos. For the American presidential election, the vast majority of the country’s vote (and larger of Religious Jews) doesn’t matter.
gavra_at_workParticipantGAW: Thank you for bringing the Rambam. I don’t know how to type in hebrew on this computer, so I had to rely on my on-the-spot translation.
Copy and paste from Mechon Mamre.
Now you can do it as well 🙂
gavra_at_workParticipantLuL – I thought you were discussing women. I did not think of that section of Shulchan Aruch (Orech Chaim) which discusses dressing oneself. The Mishna Berurah does say that one should keep covered all that is normally covered outside. Modeh.
That being said, it still has nothing to do with our discussion of pictures.
Tachlis, I asked my Rav for the halachic source, and I will bring it soon. I just want to verify something first.
I await your response with bated breath.
I am kind of surprised that this concept is such a chiddush for you. You never heard of girls not watching movies?? Or at least being careful what movies they watch???
A movie (which also has guys) is different than a catalog (assuming it only has girls), unless that catalog is made for the purpose of causing hirhurim. I’m not Choshed you about that being your question or concern.
Think about it from the opposite perspective for a minute. Is a male not allowed to see another man’s elbows or knees? Hear him sing? Swim in the same swimming pool?
Why would it be any different for women with other women?
gavra_at_workParticipantKiryas Tosh?
gavra_at_workParticipantJoe:
1: That is only once they are married.
2: The same Rambam says (as LuL points out)
??? ???? ????? ????? ??? ???? ?? ???? ???? ?????, ?????? ?????; ??? ?? ?? ????, ???? ?????? ??? ?????. ??? ???? ???? ???? ????; ????? ?????? ???? ????, ??? ???? ??? ??? ????.
Simply put, they should both offer. He should still be Mechabed her more than she him (Yoser), so he ends up holding the door.
gavra_at_workParticipanti dont look at guys so b’h my shomer einayim is doing well.
Boruch Hashem.
-
AuthorPosts