Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
frummy in the tummyParticipant
WIY – SHOCKING! You can find juicy stuff about a public figure through GOOGLE?? NO WAY!!
I didn’t vote for Obama, although it’s prob just because of all the negative talk I’ve heard about him through other sources, and I have a feeling if he were the exact same person only white, this conversation would be very different….
Oh, and I haven’t seen the dental records yet on Obama’s fourth filling in his right incisor yet; Mr. Trump, could you get on that please? After all, if you don’t agree with someone politically, he must be a lie and a cheat. And charities clearly only want your money if you’re buddy-buddy with the president.
frummy in the tummyParticipantI’ll give justhaving the benefit of the doubt and assume he didn’t just post that….Go Ravens! Caw!
frummy in the tummyParticipantI’ll burn that bridge when I come to it.
frummy in the tummyParticipantGlad I was able to begin with a little ender, and also glad there have bean (note the ‘a’) others who know this great title. Movie release 2013!
frummy in the tummyParticipantThe enemy’s gate is down.
frummy in the tummyParticipanta man a plan a canal panama
if you read this line backwards you will find your love today, but if you don’t share it with your friends, your eyes will burn out.
frummy in the tummyParticipantThat’s no moon…
frummy in the tummyParticipantHaha! You just compromised your location with that post, silly human! Prepare to be assimilated.
frummy in the tummyParticipantrealist – they are both nouns; yiras shamayim is an emotion (fear of Gd), y’rei shamayim is a person (one with fear of Gd). You are correct that y’rei shamayim is more appropriate.
frummy in the tummyParticipantmogold – In my opinion, there is a huge difference between someone who makes a simple typo and someone who lacks the fundamental skills to write a grammatically correct sentence.
Chassidishe – Keep preaching.
frummy in the tummyParticipantI hate winter. It’s time for hibernation – I’ll speak to you in May.
frummy in the tummyParticipantMost black hats fulfill the minimum requirements for a sukkah, so if the girl thinks the guy might not be frum enough to wear a black hat on the date, she should bring one to the date to provide him with the opportunity to fulfill this mitzvah. The guy should bring cookies baked by his mother so that he can make a leishev, but she should MAKE the leishev because you obviously wouldn’t trust the bracha of a guy without a black hat. And he should wear heels for pirsumei nisah.
frummy in the tummyParticipantWIY – my screen name appears differently to all who gaze upon it, so if that is how it appears to you, then that is correct for you.
“Someday we’ll find it, the rainbow connection, the lovers, the dreamers, and me.” – The Little Green Guy
frummy in the tummyParticipantMine is pronounced “Ker-mut”, as in the little green guy.
frummy in the tummyParticipantpashuteh – I don’t know if anybody on this thread is still interested, but I just heard your vort last night, and it was presented as the gematria vort that you parenthetically mentioned. That said, I don’t believe it’s true until someone counts them out for me. Frankly, I think gematrias are generally extremely flimsy; they are often wrong, even by more than the “off-by-one” rule (which in and of itself drastically reduces the impressiveness of gematria in general).
I don’t see any reason to claim the gemara is not superfluous, or even that it has no mistakes. I think it has extreme value and teaches us a many important lessons, but I personally believe that labeling something as ‘infallible’ when there is no reason to do so just causes problems that otherwise would not have existed.
frummy in the tummyParticipantill_be_strong – Well said. And thank you for the compliments. However…although you are correct that person A may not have kept up with the average, and in fact there is pretty much a 50% chance that he did NOT, in order for the probability to continue decreasing as the generations progress, as you have shown may occur between gen 1 and gen 2, his children would also need to be significantly beaten by the average, and their children, and their children, etc. Statistics’ greatest friend is large numbers – because there have been so many generations since Yishmael lived, the overall expected probability has become more and more likely to occur; in all likelihood, about half of the generations had fewer than average number of children, and the other half had more (and a minute few were dead on with average). For this reason, it is EXTREMELY likely that every person of arab ethnicity, and perhaps every person in the world, is in one way or another a direct descendant of Yishmael.
frummy in the tummyParticipantOk, last try, then I give up:
Let’s take your numbers, i.e. 1 in 10,000 first gen, which we will call gen 1, and the next gen, gen 2, contains 20,000 individuals. How many children did each person in gen 1 have (on average)? That’s right, 4 (not 2!). 10,000 people means there were 5,000 COUPLES, and if gen 2 has 20,000 individuals, each person in gen 1 had 4 children. So if the odds of Yishmael being in gen 1 are 1:10000, the odds of Yishmael having descendants in gen 2 are 4:20000, or 1:5000. So although the entire population increases by a factor of 2, Yishmaelites increase by a factor of 4.
Let us now assume that Yishmael and every person in the world continues at this same rate of multiplying by 2 every generation (i.e. each couple has 4 children apiece) for the rest of time (and to be dramatic we will assume every yishmaelite marries outside yishmael – in reality this is obviously not the case, but the point is still generally true – if you don’t get this part, ignore it). So the odds for each generation will be….
Gen 1 – 1:10000=1:10000
Gen 2 – 4:20000=1:5000
Gen 3 – 16:40000=1:2500
Gen 4 – 64:80000=1:1250
Gen 5 – 256:160000=1:625
Gen 6 – 1024:320000=1:313
Gen 7 – 4096:640000=1:156
Gen 8 – 16384:1280000=1:78
Gen 9 – 65536:2560000=1:39
Gen 10 – 262144:5280000=1:20
Gen 11 – 1048576:10240000=1:10
Gen 12 – 4194304:20480000=1:5
Gen 13 – 16777216:40960000=1:2
Gen 14 – 67108864:81920000=1:1
So…..assuming Yishmaelites continually marry non-yishmaelites, every single person in the world will be a descendant of yishmael by gen 14/15. In reality, there have been easily more than one hundred generations since he lived, so even if the VAST, VAST majority of marriages remained amongst yishmaelites, most arabs (and perhaps most people?) today are descendants of yishmael.
frummy in the tummyParticipantNomtw – Lol, that’s pretty darn tall! I’m 5′ 10″ so your scenario would make her at least as tall as me; but hey, why not? Heels are cool, and if I’m attracted to her otherwise, I don’t think heels will make or break it.
frummy in the tummyParticipantill_be_strong – My point is that those 2 original numbers, the 1 and the 10,000, are not multiplying separately. THEY HAVE THE SAME DESCENDANTS. Homo sapiens is not an asexual species (until the cloning begins :D); therefore, each parent must share parenthood of a child with another parent.
frummy in the tummyParticipantAllow me to elaborate on shein’s point: Imagine four people, A, B, C and D. (Imagine A represents our Yishmael.)
A marries B and they have children 1 & 2, C marries D and they have children 3 & 4.
1 marries 3. 2 marries 4. All of their children are descendants of each of A, B, C and D.
So although other people existed in A’s generation, all of the people two generations later are A’s descendants.
If there were 10,000 people at the time of Yishmael, there is only a 1 in 5,000 chance that someone from the immediately following generation would be a descendant of Yishmael’s (each member of this generation would have 2 parents from the preceding generation, thus multiplying the odds pretty much by 2). But with each succeeding generation, the odds of being from one specific member of that original generation increase dramatically. And there have been at least a hundred generations since Yishmael lived.
Another way to show this: You have 2 parents, 4 grandparents, 8 great grandparents, 16 great-greats…etc. So by the time you get back to Yishmael’s generation, each of us likely descends from pretty much every single person who lived on the planet at the time and had children.
September 20, 2012 8:24 pm at 8:24 pm in reply to: Not Eating Chrein Between Rosh Hashana and Hoshana Rabba #897155frummy in the tummyParticipantWIY and 2scents – I think you are misunderstanding iced’s question (he/she can correct me if I am wrong). He is not complaining that this vinegar-free horseradish is being sold in the supermarket and that Jews are consequently being nichshal – he is simply getting people’s input on whether HIS minhag would allow him to have this horseradish or not – i.e. if others have the same minhag as he does, do they eat this product? Or, a question even for those without this minhag, do people think that based on the principle of this minhag, which clearly has to do with eating foods that are simanim for a sweet year and refraining from those that are bitter/sour, would HE be allowed to make an exception for this product which is less sour than your standard horseradish?
iced – I don’t know. Good question. You def won’t go to gehinom, either way, and I doubt G-d will condemn you to a bitter year for having horseradish, but it is your family minhag, which certainly has some weight. Try your local orthodox rabbi?
frummy in the tummyParticipantfeif +1
frummy in the tummyParticipantJothar – if I were the guy (and I very well may have been; I hate the cold), I would have pushed you out the window. You wouldn’t be able to blame me for it, either, based on your own argument. 😉
frummy in the tummyParticipantI was hoping your thread would be about fantasy football….
frummy in the tummyParticipantmischief – I’ve never tried it, so I don’t know.
But seriously, depends what you mean by ‘a lot’. I generally like the makeup look, and rarely notice there being too much. If it looks good, I like it. But this is one of those preference things – every guy likes something different (I’ve discovered that with my friend who keeps trying to set me up with people I’m not attracted to). And some guys don’t like makeup at all.
frummy in the tummyParticipantI agree – if you believe that it’s important for your child to have long peyos, then why wouldn’t you have them yourself, too? But when I see that a kid has them and his father doesn’t, I usually assume it is either the child’s preference or some stupid school rule (although there is plenty of bad parenting out there, so who knows).
frummy in the tummyParticipantI heard he wanted to name his third child “Football” but Hashem told him not to because the world wasn’t ready yet.
frummy in the tummyParticipantShe wears a size 16 because she just ate and ate.
The woman kept her purse open because she heard there would be some change in the weather.
A horse walks into a bar and the bartender says, “So what’s with the long face?”
I hear this new cemetery is very popular. People are just dying to get in.
The actor playing the astronaut was killed by a shooting star.
Two fish were in a tank. One said to the other, “Do you know how to drive this thing?”
frummy in the tummyParticipantTCG – You are right that the other two planes are not given enough attention when it comes to 9/11 memorial. I think zahavasdad’s reasons for this correct, but I think one of the main reasons people focus on the WTC is that the twin towers were such an icon of America – it’s just such an easy image to recall that NY skyline with those magnificent buildings towering above. I don’t live in NY but I still saw the twin towers in this way. The pentagon’s architecture is definitely notable but it does not quite evoke the same magnificence as the twin towers did.
frummy in the tummyParticipantQuestion for women: Do you see the man’s role in marriage as being something of the ‘leader’, someone to whom the woman looks up to in a certain sense and to whom she can look to for guidance in a way that he can not look to her? To me, this seems like something that should be left behind in the 19th century. I’m not expecting this to be a unanimous vote but I am interested in hearing what people have to say on the matter.
frummy in the tummyParticipantgavra_at_work: don’t you mean live and let die? (That seems so familiar for some reason….)
September 11, 2012 5:55 pm at 5:55 pm in reply to: Did Neil Armstrong really land on the moon?? #896856frummy in the tummyParticipantI don’t KNOW, but I believe.
frummy in the tummyParticipantDarn it! I clicked on the wrong thread again!
frummy in the tummyParticipantReally? Are you saying the greatness of a woman is determined by the greatness of her husband? What about the great women who didn’t marry?
frummy in the tummyParticipantI was in 10th grade. It was right after shacharis, and there was some word spreading through the halls about a plane crashing into the twin towers. At first, I figured “big deal”, so a couple stupid people crash their private jet into the buildings and end up killing themselves (and I figured nobody else got hurt). Then we heard about the second plane, and then about the collapse…
frummy in the tummyParticipantI play starcraft, but I have respect for the wow community. Does your wife have any single sisters?
frummy in the tummyParticipantThis is how I understand R’ Keleman’s proof based on national revelation; I will write ‘A’ for every “proof” to our having received the Torah from G-d at Sinai, and ‘Q’ for every “disproof”:
A: 3 million people stood at Sinai and witnessed G-d give the Torah to Moshe.
Q: Maybe they lied.
A: The likelihood that 3 million people could have pulled off a lie of that magnitude, and that none of those 3 million would reveal the secret, is ridiculously small and pretty much unfathomable. No other religion has even made such a claim because a claim like that could only stand if it were actually true.
Q: Who says there were actually 3 million ppl? Maybe somebody made up this story at some point in history?
A: In what form could this lie have been presented such that the facts on the ground (i.e. we Jews believe our ancestors received the Torah from G-d) would match the story we have all been brought up to believe? Let’s break it down into a past, present, or future lie, i.e. the person or people (let’s call him Bob) who made this lie up came over to a group of people (the would-be Jews), handed them the Torah (written by Bob), and either convinced them that they or their descendants would eventually receive this Torah from G-d (future), that they themselves had received this Torah from G-d (present), or that their ancestors of the past had received this Torah from G-d (past) and Bob is returning it to them. Future is impossible, because the message that would be passed on to future generations is that the Torah has yet to be given (or at least verified by G-d). Present lie is hard, because you must convince a large group of people that they saw something which they did not. Past is the only real possible lie, where you are just returning the long-lost religion of their ancestors back to them, but in order for it to work, there should be a large gap in the history books from the time the Torah was ‘given’ to the time it was ‘regiven’ by Bob. Also, how come there is no record of this ever important Bob in the history books?
Q: Let’s focus on past lie: There are several figures in Tanach who could have filled the role of “Bob”; for example Ezra HASOFER. (Like any good yeshiva bochur, I know pretty much nothing about Nach, so I don’t know how easy or difficult it is to say Ezra is our Bob). Also, isn’t there some thing about there being like 160 years missing between the batei mikdashos? Anybody else heard of such a thing? If so, that could be our significant time gap which would allow past lie to take shape.
A: What about people today who have a historical lineage (either father-son or rebbe-talmud) back to Sinai? Doesn’t that negate there being a gap?
Q: Remember, Bob is one smart individual, and because this is past lie, he didn’t have to actually go to a group of 3 million people. Imagine he came up to a village of 100 – 1000 people and had them gather around. He tells them he is a prophet and their 3 million ancestors received the Torah (and they lost it due to lack of faith, natural disaster, etc.). He is convincing, but they want to know their lineage back to the Torah’s giving – was it great-grandpa, great-great, 5 greats, 8 greats? So he asks them for their lineage as far back as they know, and then makes up the rest from there. And why question Bob? After all, he is a prophet. And this group grew quickly. A group of 100 people for which the average family size is 4 kids and the average generation is 25 years will grow to more than 6 million within 400 years. And now the entire nation will believe that their 3 million ancestors received the Torah from G-d, and some will even have a lineage back to its giving.
A: (The “Bomb”) Okay, so maybe the claim of national revelation in and of itself isn’t so strong. But then why is it unique to the Jews? If it’s so easy to reproduce, why doesn’t every Tom, Dick, and Harry start a religion based on national revelation? There have been thousands of religions and cults formed throughout history, and as far as we know only one is founded on national revelation. It seems to be that national revelation is very unlikely to have been caused by a natural phenomenon. One of the fundamental principles of science is that things that are natural tend to reoccur, reappear, have cycles, etc. and in terms of history, well, history repeats itself. So if it is very unlikely that the national revelation story occurred naturally, that makes it much more LIKELY that occurred supernaturally.
Q: (This is my own) I can’t say I ever found his “bomb” so compelling, but along his line of reasoning, you might as well just say the fact that the world’s technology and communication is more advanced than it ever has been is “supernatural”, because that is the real reason no such claim has been reproduced. It just wouldn’t have a place to get off the ground under the conditions of today, nor probably those of the past couple centuries. Any claim like that would be too easily verified or disproved from countless sources. And once you’ve eliminated the possibility of national revelation reocurring in the future or having occurred any time recently, how many religions do you really have left to choose from (that we know the origin of and are more than let’s say 250 years old) and say, “Oh wow, Judaism must be really special because it’s the ONLY one with that kind of claim”? 10? 20? Idk, to me a 1/20 chance doesn’t really seem “proof-worthy”.
Let me know if anything I’ve said makes any sense at all.
frummy in the tummyParticipantThe world would have ceased to exist if Torah was not being studied. No world – no questions.”
I can think of no adequate way to properly respond to this, and so I won’t.
frummy in the tummyParticipantWolf – I agree with almost everything you have posted.
frummy in the tummyParticipantbesalel – do you believe in the infallibility of the five books of moses? I’m not saying you have to, but I would venture to say that 99% of ‘Torah observant’ Jews do. If you do as well, I don’t really follow what you’re saying.
frummy in the tummyParticipantrepharim –
1) See my previous post
2) That doesn’t seem very impressive – just seems like a guess gone right. Are you aware that there are nine times as many integers with 18 digits as there are integers with 1-17 digits?
3) To me your strongest, but we don’t know what kind of medical knowledge people may or may not have had.
4) Not sure how this proves Torah min hashamayim (certainly not shebichsav) – just means they had the instruments to measure it. Do we really know how much knowledge the Greeks and Romans garnered before the onset of the Dark Ages?
5) Not really a strong proof even if you can prove that the hair thing is true.
6) You’re mixing up two unrelated probabilities; the shakespeare monkeys and airplane tornado are meant to give a mental image for the order of the universe as we see it having been formed from randomness and is more of an argument against evolution than anything else. Finding random words in a book does not have significant odds; I have seen Discovery’s codes seminar and wasn’t really impressed – it’s basically taking letters spaced every __ letters apart and finding the words those letters make up. The proof is basically from the ‘significant’ number of these words that are associated with the parsha in which they are located. Considering that there are millions of such words you can form from every parsha, is it so surprising that a few of them are related to the topic?
frummy in the tummyParticipantAllow me to clarify the intent of my question – pretend I am merely conducting a form of social experiment and that I have no personal interest in the actual answers (although admittedly I do). Assuming there is an infinite Creator, which to me seems easier to prove than to disprove, how do we know that the Torah (shebich’sav) is an exact representation of His Will and as such is presumably infallible? And I am not interested so much in the form of the proof, as long as it is convincing; as long as it warrants a person to live his/her life based on the Truth therein.
Curiosity: If you know of R’ Keleman’s proof, which follows your line of reasoning, we can skip several steps and boil his ‘bomb’ down to the fact that no other religion has ever made such a claim as ‘national revelation’, and that itself is the proof – why is no other religion based on such a claim unless Judaism is special? But how many religions are even old enough to make a claim such as that and get away with it? Any claim about a huge event within the past couple centuries can easily be verified or disproved from countless sources. Would you need more than both hands to count the number of religions that are older than that in the world? At the end of the day, I would still contend that R’ Keleman’s ‘past lie’ disproof, i.e. that someone came along at some point and convinced a group of people that their ancestors stood at Sinai, is a pretty strong argument. And his argument that if such a claim were natural (i.e. not supernatural), it would recur at some point later in history, I would argue that the opportunities necessary for such a claim to form anew diminish as communication advances and has advanced in the past centuries.
musser zoger +1
September 6, 2012 4:25 pm at 4:25 pm in reply to: Rav Aharon Leib Shteinman tells Yidden to shun secular education #895813frummy in the tummyParticipantharotzeh, if your rabbi told you to jump off a bridge, would you do it? I find it pitiable that you find people using their own brains laughable. Do the talmidei chachamim of our generation have more Torah knowledge than you and me? Certainly. Do they have a better understanding of the world around us? Possibly. But even if Moses himself told you to do something, don’t you think G-d gave you a brain to actually use it and decide if that commandment makes any sense? I completely understand and agree with having a rav and relying on his Torah knowledge for decisions, and when the available choices make sense in my own mind I will of course follow the rav’s. But to listen when what he’s saying is completely counter to everything my brain tells me about the way the world works? Why would I treat the tools G-d gave me with such worthlessness? And frankly, I’m not trying to say anything negative about anyone, but since when is ANYONE in our generation an undisputed leader of klal yisroel?
And as for those complaining about hearing half (or maybe false) quote of R’ Steinman, you’re absolutely correct, we don’t know what he really said, but I don’t have a problem arguing with the statement, regardless of whether it was actually said or not.
frummy in the tummyParticipantvochindik – No, no, no, you got it all wrong. He’s actually a CR mod, and wanted to see if any of her friends would talk about it in the CR, and THAT’S why she failed the test.
frummy in the tummyParticipantshein – are you saying “ignorance is bliss”? Don’t Muslims have emuna pshuta too?
oomis – I’m curious to know what your stories of hashgacha are…any specific ones come to mind?
ready now – do you mind elaborating on this “unbroken chain of teaching Torah”?
curiosity and halevi – I hope you’re joking…
frummy in the tummyParticipantWikipedia:
Murphy’s law is an adage or epigram that is typically stated as: “Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong”.
frummy in the tummyParticipantI keep trying to remember if I’ve ever been at a wedding where we did the hora to a four beat song; now that you say it, I probably have without realizing it. That’s pretty funny. Is the hora an Arabic dance?
frummy in the tummyParticipantThe chareidim believe that as soon as all jewish men sit down and learn, everything else will be okay. Leave real jobs to the stupid goyim who somehow believe this world is actually worth bettering and preserving. HA! Silly goyim, so cute sometimes, don’t you just want to pinch their cheeks?
After all, the best way to deal with problems is to ignore them.
September 5, 2012 6:58 pm at 6:58 pm in reply to: Rav Aharon Leib Shteinman tells Yidden to shun secular education #895788frummy in the tummyParticipantmusser zoger +1
I think it’s right near the part where pi = 3.0 and sqrt(2) = 1.40
frummy in the tummyParticipantIt’s highly important that these so-called jews who use iphones be ostracized and banned from the almost-Utopian society known as Eretz Yisroel. After all, peace, happiness, and supreme moral standards are defining characteristics of the people of this land. If only these rasha’im would part with these demonic devices, Moshiach would surely come. I’m so glad the ‘gedolim’ were perceptive enough to find this last bastion of evil residing in our midst and put an end to it.
-
AuthorPosts