feivel

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1,101 through 1,150 (of 1,541 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Will They EVER Learn? #635529
    feivel
    Participant

    qwert

    i didnt mean to imply it wasnt a neis, just that it wasnt unique$

    in reply to: Will They EVER Learn? #635526
    feivel
    Participant

    qwert

    not the first time this has happened, not by far.$

    in reply to: The Laboratory II – Try Your HTML & ASCII Art Experiments Here #1053198
    feivel
    Participant
    in reply to: The Camel & The Desert #1099678
    feivel
    Participant

    ames

    now that they have given me my own section in the forums i am a subsidiary member of the YWN team.

    therefore im afraid that information is CLASSIFIED

    sorry

    in reply to: The Camel & The Desert #1099677
    feivel
    Participant

    while were on the subject:

    a few ways that camels deal with the sand:

    A thin nictitating membrane on the eye, like a clear inner eyelid, protects the eye from sandstorms while still letting in enough light for camels to see.

    Double rows of extra-long eyelashes also help keep sand out of the eyes.

    Camels can close their nostrils to keep sand out of their noses!

    Their large, broad feet do not sink in desert sand.

    in reply to: The Camel & The Desert #1099676
    feivel
    Participant

    youre right ames

    except

    its not actually spit

    it is more like vomit

    it is the contents of their stomach which they bring up and expel

    it is more noxious than spit thereby more effective in getting their enemy to flee, and has a lower water content than spit

    in reply to: Bituchin & Emunah #1072571
    feivel
    Participant
    in reply to: A Humorous Item #1172077
    feivel
    Participant

    moish

    like this:

    lets say you want “moish in blue

    moish, charles:

    you type the following:

    <x>moish</x>

    except you dont use “x” as the letter, you use “a” i couldnt use “a” in the example i showed you because then it would just show as a blue “moish” and you wouldnt be able to see what i did

    get it?

    in reply to: A Humorous Item #1172068
    feivel
    Participant

    “by the way everyone, check out the new joke of the day”

    you mean joke of the WEEK

    in reply to: Smoking vs. Bochurim on the Internet #638793
    feivel
    Participant

    To all of you who wrong your hands and tut tut about the internet and the need to asser it, consider the following: When printing was first invented (and printing was its generation’s internet in terms of making information, including “bad stuff” available to the masses) did rabbonim protest and try to forbid it?

    i dont recall the printing presses printing full color pictures and video of the worst kind of lewdness, with instant access, sometimes even if you dont want it. i dont reall being able to press on a piece of paper and gamble away my family’s life savings, as well as lose my job and family and health, so easily, a click away. i dont recall the instant communication and ability to fool thousands of young children by pedophiles posing as someone else and arranging ugly meetings, i dont recall men becoming addicted to printing press games and destroying their lives along with their families. you know we could go on and on

    so maybe there is something to “tut, tut” about as you so nicely phrased it.

    in reply to: The Boxing Glove Shrimp (not kosher) #634920
    feivel
    Participant

    sj

    it is to scare off predators

    in reply to: Clark’s Nutcracker #1097618
    feivel
    Participant

    itzik

    what you say makes sense

    unfortunately you will have to find a different explanation

    clarks nutcrackers are only found in the western parts of north america

    in reply to: Clark’s Nutcracker #1097613
    feivel
    Participant

    moishe, perfect as usual

    in reply to: The Bombadier Beetle #778958
    feivel
    Participant

    fantastic moish

    i should have a new thread coming soon (i already posted it)

    about another kind of bird

    i dont think it is as cute as tweety however

    in reply to: Torah Tapes / CDs #642138
    feivel
    Participant

    Rabbi Avigdor Miller, tz’l

    Rabbi Ephrayim Wachsman

    notpashut:

    Rabbi Yisroel Reisman said that he listens to Rabbi Millers shiurim also

    in reply to: The Bombadier Beetle #778956
    feivel
    Participant

    tweety bird would be fine moish

    in reply to: The Bombadier Beetle #778953
    feivel
    Participant

    how about the northern three toed woodpecker

    in reply to: The Bombadier Beetle #778949
    feivel
    Participant

    good try moish

    but that’s actually a dung beetle

    you dont want me to post about dung beetles i think

    in reply to: The Bombadier Beetle #778945
    feivel
    Participant

    sj

    there are “scientific” explanations for the kria

    ive seen:

    earthquake, shifting of tetonic plates (in my opinion the most reasonable)

    localized wind inversion

    concentrated tidal forces of an unusual planetary and moon alignment

    i hate to break it to you but your professors explanation, although possible (anything is “possible”, its even possible that oj is not a killer), is trillions of orders of magnitude less likely than any other explanation.

    in reply to: The Bombadier Beetle #778942
    feivel
    Participant

    excellent moishe

    in reply to: The Bombadier Beetle #778938
    feivel
    Participant

    Pirke Avos 5:6 states: “Ten things were created Erev Shabbos bein hashmashos”:

    1.The opening of the earth that swallowed Korach and his followers.

    2.the well that opened when Moshe hit the rock.

    3.the mouth of Bilaam’s donkey that enabled it to speak).

    4.the first rainbow, during Noach’s time.

    5.the mann.

    6.Moshe’s staff.

    7.the shamir

    8.the shapes of the letters.

    9.the original writing implement used in writing the Aseres Dibros

    10.the original stone tablets

    in reply to: Allomerus Decemarticulatus #634310
    feivel
    Participant

    sj sorry i misunderstood you in the other thread

    in reply to: The Bombadier Beetle #778934
    feivel
    Participant

    ok sj

    i misunderstood you!

    rabbi yes check Ramchal again

    Hashem did NOT program miracles into the Briah, only specific ones that were created Bain HaShmoshos the first Erev Shabbos. i believe when Yehoshua stopped the sun this was one of them (not positive) this is a famous Medresh. the rest of your misconceptions i already discussed.

    in reply to: Allomerus Decemarticulatus #634308
    feivel
    Participant

    well squirrels used to go up trees but they could never come down again

    so after a million years of squirrels stuck in trees, some cosmic rays, mutations, and other birth defects decided in their wisdom to create an unbelievably complex ankle system of tarsals metatarsals muscles nerves, and a brilliant arrangement of tendons that allow the back ankles to turn around 180 degrees and operate under complete control in the exact opposite direction that the ankles turn to go up the tree!

    Evolution apparently decided the cats did not deserve such an arrangement, after consulting with some mice.

    in reply to: Allomerus Decemarticulatus #634306
    feivel
    Participant

    ok rosh

    ever wonder why cats can climb up trees but cant get down, yet squirrels can zip right down trees and poles head first as easily as they go up.

    both of them have front and back claws which dig quite well into wood, whats the difference?

    answer to follow, b’li neder

    as long as were talking squirrels. did anyone ever watch a squirrel bury a nut, then go right to that spot to see if they could find the nut? you never will.

    answer to follow, b’li neder

    in reply to: Allomerus Decemarticulatus #634305
    feivel
    Participant

    planets? no.

    in reply to: The Bombadier Beetle #778931
    feivel
    Participant

    ames

    i dont know if its a bigger miracle or not, i think its the same thing, and appreciation of the Boreh’s kindness should be the same for both. but this appreciation, that is what is greater when it is recognized during health than after a recovery from illness.

    in reply to: The Bombadier Beetle #778929
    feivel
    Participant

    invaginations happen

    muscles move

    the beetle learns to wiggle

    cells move

    cells appear

    chemicals appear

    walls get thicker

    abdomen elongates

    lots of other stuff happens, lots

    A mixture of these two chemicals in the presence of the two enzymes in a confined space is explosive. The beetle, on his way to becoming a bombardier beetle, would have to be smart enough to carefully store the chemicals in a storage chamber apart from the enzymes but in the presence of an inhibitor to prevent them from reacting prematurely with one another. He also would have to be smart enough to know which enzymes he needs to catalyze the chemical reactions involved, and he would have to be smart enough to secrete them into the combustion chamber. The combustion chamber itself must be very special, able to resist the corrosive effect of the hot, irritating chemicals and strong enough to contain the high pressure without rupturing. The combustion chamber must also be equipped with a highly efficient valve, and the appropriate muscles must exist to manipulate the combustion tube and point it in the right direction. Of course, all of this incredibly complex apparatus would be totally useless without a precisely designed and perfectly functional communication system to squirt the charge of chemicals into the combustion tube, secrete the enzymes into the combustion tube, activate the valve at the appropriate moment, and differentially and precisely send the correct signals to all of the different muscles involved, in order to point the combustion tube in the right direction. Evolutionists would have us believe that all of the thousands of genes required to direct the construction and operation of all of this arose through a series of copying errors. Furthermore, these complex genetic changes had to occur in just the right order, so that at every stage of development the beetle was not only able to survive but also was actually superior to the preceding stage.

    This notion is more than scientifically untenable; it is simply preposterous, but those with their rock hard faith will continue to squirm and wiggle and turn logic on its head to provide “answers”

    this is nothing new. the Torah has been attacked with “logic” since the greek “philosophers” and beyond.

    we know the Torah will endure all these attacks, and fools in the guise of wise professors will be seen to be what they are.

    in reply to: Hamantaschen Recipes #1222753
    feivel
    Participant

    whatever you make

    please dont be skimpy with the filling

    this is a chesorin with most hamentaschen ive eaten, homemade or bakery.

    in reply to: The Bombadier Beetle #778928
    feivel
    Participant

    no Rabbi

    you are certainly correct about Hashgacha Pratis.

    but the issue i am talking about is quite distinct from Hashgacha Pratis

    Hashem controls every movement of every atom (indeed every quark and whatever quarks might be composed of). every movement of every person, Jew and goy, every animal, every plant.

    Hashgocho Pratis has to do with the “interest”, mida kneged mida, mercy, and other parameters that are distinguished between the Jew and goy.

    in addition Hashem deals with the Jew directly, not through melachim as he does with the goy. this is all quite clear in Derech Hashem

    the “laws of nature” are merely the ways in which Hashem has chosen to limit himself, so to speak. the sun does not come up every morning because Hashem “wound its spring” 5,000 years ago. Hashem brings up the sun every morning.

    a miracle is not Hashem intervening in “nature”. it is the same as all other phenomena except that it differs from the “laws” of the Briah, except for those miracles that were placed into the Briah at the time of creation. it’s essential nature is no different however. Ramchal is not ambiguous about this.

    in reply to: Daven With A Hat BeYichidus or Without it with a Minyan #1081910
    feivel
    Participant

    “I still say it’s what’s in your heart”

    true, when i eat pork, the taste i love so much brings me to such Simcha that i am better able to learn and daven. that’s really what Hashem cares about. why would he care about which particular animal’s meat i put into my mouth. ridiculous.

    in reply to: Toiveling Plastic Utensils???? #634331
    feivel
    Participant

    PLASTIC DOES NOT NEED TVEILA

    whether disposable or not, thick or thin.

    if it is covered by a metal layer, i dont know, but i would doubt that it would need tveila

    in reply to: The Bombadier Beetle #778925
    feivel
    Participant

    sj

    correction

    i said “all” Meforshim

    actually i believe there maybe a few who hold differently than the Ramchal, i think.

    but the Ramchals Derech is certainly the generally accepted one.

    in reply to: The Bombadier Beetle #778924
    feivel
    Participant

    the basic reason for the creation of the World is for Bechira, so that we may choose Good over Evil, and thus justly receive Reward.

    this requires a delicate balance in the World.

    thus when the Yetzer HaRah for Avodah Zorah was “schected”, Nvius also ended.

    thus Good must be balanced by Evil

    Emes in the world must be balanced by Sheker in the world

    clear vision must be balanced by illusion

    Light must be balanced by the potential for darkness

    spiritual light by spiritual darkness

    The Torah must be balanced by the views of the Nations

    thank you, zero, for keeping us balanced.

    in reply to: The Bombadier Beetle #778923
    feivel
    Participant

    sj

    CERTAINLY you are not a kofer, chas v Shalom, but what you say is not the Emes. read, if you will, Derech Hashem, who explains, as do all Meforshim, that Hashem controls everything that occurs, at all times. if you throw a handful of sand into the air, Hashem directs the path of every single grain as it falls to the ground. In NO sense do things occur according to “laws of nature” that Hashem created. the “laws of nature” are simply the ways in which Hashem limits his actions. that’s one reason why He is called Ne’eman. that’s one reason why he is called Shadai, the limiting one.

    we say somewhere in the Davening in the morning that Hashem creates the world anew every moment. if so what the Ramchal (Derech Hashem) says must logically be so. think about it.

    in reply to: The Bombadier Beetle #778910
    feivel
    Participant

    zero

    mr “educated in science”

    how completely absurd

    it is a famously discredited and futile attempt to restore a bit of credibility to “evolution” .wherever you copied it from, it is desperately all over the internet.

    “small invaginations develop” they just “develop” what function did these invaginations serve untli the beetle “learned to wiggle”? how did it learn to wiggle? how many cosmic rays and birth defects did it take until the beetles central nervous system was reorganized so that it should wiggle? do you think the beetle “figured out” how to wiggle, then teaches this wiggling to its larvae? how did this occur without damaging the preexisting perfectly functioning neurological organization? after a million years of reorganization, how was it reorganized further to wiggle only when certain predators were recognized? (we dont want the wiggling to deplete its store of toxins when no predators are present.) after it learned to wiggle when predators were present, how many more millions of years were needed for the brilliant mother evolution to teach it that it should only wiggle when the predator is a certain distance? too far and its a waste, too close and its too late. and how many more birth defects did it take until it could wiggle in the direction of the predator? what good were the invaginations when the toxin was distributed over its skin? how did the surface of the invaginations learn to make more of the toxin to fill the invagination? if the skin toxins were effective why did they stop making them?

    none of the components of this complex system can function without the others.

    invaginations happened

    invaginations deepen

    muscles move

    some invaginations deepen

    some disappear

    cells develop

    channels appear

    muscles move some more

    no intelligence is directing this

    nothing but randomness.

    nothing of consequence is said

    your “proposed scenario is almost as full of holes as the evolution fantasy itself.

    here is how a mousetrap is made when a tornado travels through a junkyard:

    a piece of wood appears

    a nail is bent by the wind pushing it against a pipe (pipes and nails are common in a junkyard) the wind then pushes the point of the nail into the piece of wood

    a spring is forced from a childs toy

    the spring has pointed ends and is stuck in the wood across from the nail

    the spring is attached to a firm metal wire which was previously bent by the wind…i havent got any more time for this nonsense

    in reply to: The Bombadier Beetle #778906
    feivel
    Participant

    ames

    i have not read them

    i will not read them

    if you have a question based on those books, i might be able to answer it or not, if you want try one.

    in reply to: The Bombadier Beetle #778899
    feivel
    Participant

    thank you ames

    i also got a bit of chills reading your story.

    R’ Miller zt’l, though i never saw or met him, i feel like he is my father and Rebbe.

    had a PROFOUND influence on me

    by the way, the first year or so that i listened to his tapes i assumed he was about 6 feet tall and 300 pounds

    in reply to: The Bombadier Beetle #778898
    feivel
    Participant

    “is is probably true for most people, but there are some true athiests”

    i cant tell you but Rav Wolfson says that EVERYONE has complete Emunah implanted within him by the Boreh. an atheist is called a “kofer” in Loshon HaKodesh. Chazal say we can find the true root meaning of a word from the first place it is mentioned in the Torah. Kofer is first mentioned by Noah’s teveh, meaning to cover over, to prevent water from passing through. this is the root meaning of atheism, not really to deny as much as to cover and separate from that which is already within.

    do you think one of these “true atheists” if charles manson was holding a knife to his throat, after witnessing him murder the other people in the room, would not beg G-D to save him??

    “What I never understood is when Atheists talk about wanting a moral society without religion – how do you decide what is moral then? Its very arbritrary and many people end up using basic societal laws (like most of the Sheva Mitzvot Bnei Noach). Sorry, thats leeching off religion and G-d”

    EXACTLY

    hatler, i believe, truly thought he was perfecting the world, and that he was acting in accord with perfect “morality”

    in reply to: The Bombadier Beetle #778896
    feivel
    Participant

    SJ

    Rav Moshe Wolfson says “they DO believe” (eg the atheist in a foxhole example and many more) but they lie to themselves and cling with every ounce of strength to what they know to be lies, BECAUSE THEY DO NOT WANT A BOSS.

    in reply to: The Bombadier Beetle #778895
    feivel
    Participant

    ames

    i usually primarily copy and paste from different sources and add some words (or sometimes remove some technical parts) to make it more readable to the Yeshiva world, but completely based on one or more sources. i got in the habit of doing this and sending out the best ones to my Rav and a few other interested parties. it grew out of Seudah Shlesis discussions about Rabbi Avigdor Miller, tz’l.

    you know the Chovos HaLevovos states that this is one of two ways of coming closer to Hashem and developing a high level of Emunah, the other is Torah. Avrohom Aveinu, as you know, utilized this first method, and saw the second method within it.

    Hashem made the Briah with its BILLIONS of wonders for us to utilize. shall we ignore his will and kindness?

    in many regards (not all, certainly not for direct Schar) it is equal to learning Torah

    (the Gemorrah you might know about not stopping learning to appreciate the trees outdoors, which you might bring as a contradiction, referred to taking pleasure from the trees, not studying them)

    in reply to: The Wasp and the Zombie Cockroach #692793
    feivel
    Participant

    icot, i took no offense at any post.

    i was however disapointed that some posters didnt understand the point of marveling at Hashem s works. probably i shouldnt have said that. i particularly was not referring to your post.

    in reply to: The Bombadier Beetle #778892
    feivel
    Participant

    curious: kind of randomly, ie one day i might type “amazing creatures” in google, then take it from there

    RY: yes, in jest; or rather, said in wonderment at how anyone could think chaotic randomness could produce such a marvel.

    in reply to: The Wasp and the Zombie Cockroach #692791
    feivel
    Participant

    itzik

    i dont know about tigers stripes, you may very well be right.

    certainly as regards color, the world could have been created to function without it. it is purely for our pleasure, and to show us the kindness of Hashem in the olam

    as regards zebra stripes which, like the tiger, actually seem to worsen their camouflage, they have done some research that indicates that the movement of zebras within a herd, stripes against stripes, serves to confuse the visual system of predators as to how far away the herd is, how large it is, the presence of slower moving zebras (weak ones), and perhaps other matters.

    tigers dont really have predators but maybe there is something similar in some way to how the stripes function by zebras.

    in reply to: Pistachio Nuts #643803
    feivel
    Participant

    curious, itzik

    i thought my facetiousness was glarlngly obvious

    im sorry, i guess i was wrong, i thought the phrase “Chasdei Hashem” was a giveaway, no?

    in reply to: The Wasp and the Zombie Cockroach #692785
    feivel
    Participant

    im a Yid.

    im sorry there is so much letzonis here

    in reply to: The Wasp and the Zombie Cockroach #692776
    feivel
    Participant

    these threads are not strange

    Hashem’s works are beautiful and marvelous

    and put here to show us his Majesty and Oneness.

    should we fail to study and publicize them?

    in reply to: Pistachio Nuts #643793
    feivel
    Participant

    RY

    out of touch with what?

    what reality?

    did you learn the Shaar Bchina in Chovos HaLavos?

    are you familiar, do you understand what Rabbi Avigdor Miller, tz’l said so often?

    in reply to: If You Could Have Anything… #1154875
    feivel
    Participant

    closeness to Hashem

    in reply to: Should The CR Have Sports Threads? #831653
    feivel
    Participant

    yu- bochur:

    a previous post:

    “Can someone please explain to me exactly what is “not kosher” about sports”

    its not “not kosher”

    its simply a lowly derech, a goyish derech.

    if it fits well into your mahalch, it is not “not kosher”

    no reason it shouldnt be allowed here in my opinion. this is “yeshiva world” not “trying my best to utilize OlamHaZeh purely for the sake of the RibbonoShelOlam world”

Viewing 50 posts - 1,101 through 1,150 (of 1,541 total)