emes nisht sheker

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 201 through 250 (of 272 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: How far is too far? #1925286
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    At this point after all the attacks Trump has made on American Democracy if you are still pro-Trump you either don’t care about American Democracy or you are in the cult and believe whatever he does is automatically the best.

    in reply to: Shmiras Shabbos is the answer to Climate Change. #1925273
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    I wonder how many of you actually made an effort to try to understand the science of climate change. Guess it is easier to knock things you denied before you got a chance to study the details.

    in reply to: How far is too far? #1925269
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    Thanks ubiq. Beyond odd that people are having trouble with this. Did I suggest that Obama’s book was not a memoir? It is really odd and feels like I am dealing with people unhinged from reality. My point, which you elaborated on nicely, was clear enough. I guess when a cult is having a crisis of belief it is expected that the disconnect from reality grows.

    in reply to: How far is too far? #1925184
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    These comments are like straight out of a dystopian nightmare. You think Trump’s 19 books are not about how great he is? Right. Look at his books and then read my comment and you would understand why calling Trump a lousy businessmen is spot on.

    Trump is a narcissist who built a cult around him who he sells his lies to. He is a scam artist.

    You want to not be considered part of the cult, maybe post comments that are not ridiculous. Anyone that suggests that Obama’s books or Biden’s comment from 2012 somehow makes them bigger narcissists or show they talk worse than Trump is clearly part of the cult. And it is funny, because many in the cult celebrate Trump’s vile language and narcissism. Really the only criteria to be in the cult is unwavering devotion to Trump and inability to recognize his flaws, or at least inability to recognize that his flaws are not good for a President to have.

    in reply to: How far is too far? #1925095
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    Trump wrote 19 books before being President. Obama and Bush are at four or five. Trump could have invested Daddy’s money and been just as well off (Fred was a good businessman). Instead he scammed people and did not pay his bills (he took advantage of the bankruptcy laws if you recall his brag from his 2016 campaign).

    Oh, and you had to look to 2012 to find something Biden said you don’t like.

    Yeah. And these guys are the supreme narcissists and I am the hypocrite.

    Seriously, are you even being serious or are you just being a troll. As they say, don’t feed the trolls, so I am out of this.

    in reply to: Stop the Steal, Anarchists #1925050
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    tvp – the thing is none of their cases has presented evidence of fraud that has held up. So no, what they are doing is trying to overturn an election, not expose fraud, otherwise they would actually show their work. The affidavits… All the affidavits… So far have not held up. Powell presented an affidavit from some crackpot that made up a nonexistant county and that was considered one of the best witnesses.

    in reply to: How far is too far? #1925048
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    Did I say Trump was an antisemite?

    But glad you agree with my point that antisemites can employ Jews in high positions.

    The implications are that your examples of elevating women or black people to various positions are not necessarily by themselves refutation of claims that he is misogynist or racist.

    Not even saying he is misogynist or racist, rather I think mainly he is a supreme narcissist and thinks everyone not a member of his cult of personality is a traitor. And, he will use any and all language no matter how despicable to refer to those he disagrees with. If on the other hand your are a member of his cult, he would be hard pressed to find anything you do wrong (so long as you don’t challenge him). Even going so far as to seemingly praising white supremacists.

    in reply to: How far is too far? #1925006
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    T2024 – So, by that logic, if someone has Jews working for them in some capacity guess they can’t be antisemitc. I am sure we all know how true this must be. When one looks back to Nazi Germany, Jews apparently were not employed by antisemites, and definitely not in high positions, prior to the shoah.

    in reply to: Are anti trumpers actual liberals? #1924983
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    Health – Thanks for clarifying that you have no idea what practices are considered idolatry or to what extent it occurs in the US. Because, that is the only way you can suggest this country does not have a problem with idolatry. Statistics of people that follow various religions that are in halacha clearly considered idolatry are not hard to find. People also do this openly and proudly. This is far more egregious than abortion. But then again, when your politics are based in something other than the Torah guess it is easy to pick and choose your issues and say that you are representing God. Far harder to actually study what God wants from you and to represent that.

    in reply to: Are anti trumpers actual liberals? #1924696
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    Health – So maybe you can understand that just because someone says the government should not be involved in Abortion does not mean they are pro-abortion. It is not unlike you not wanting to take a position on freedom of religion and you are saying that does not mean you are pro-idolatry. At least I am consistent in that I support both freedom of religion and don’t want the government involved in abortion. These are both overall personal things that I don’t see why government needs to be involved in either. If you think religion demands you be opposed to abortion and you have to make political choices based on that, then religion also demands you be opposed to idolatry and you should pursue that in your political choices. You don’t get to pick and choose what Noahide laws are important, at least not in Judaism. This is why I repeat your politics are not based in the Torah. They are based on something else. I can’t say what for sure, but definitely not Jewish tradition.

    in reply to: Are anti trumpers actual liberals? #1924698
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    RatingStheRumpus – Wow, a reasonable conservative here. You can see from my own posts that I don’t agree with all your points, but nice to see someone actually who a debate can be had with. With the others here it is like, if you don’t agree with me then God hates you and you are a sinner and you hate America. While they happened before I was born, I recently listened to an old debate between Nixon and JFK. Disregarding any issues with Nixon later on, the tone of the debate was we both want what is best for this country but we disagree on how you get there. Not this sick, depraved view that the Trump cult espouses that Democrats hate this country.

    in reply to: Are anti trumpers actual liberals? #1924596
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    Word is Jill was in middle of a messy civil divorce in in March that year when she and Joe were set up. She completed the divorce in May. Thanks for the gossip. Not sure in what world that behavior is improper. Halacha is pretty clear that once the relationship is over, regardless of the technicalities of civil divorce she is not considered married.

    But, don’t tell that to Trumptards. In their world only improper actions by their messiah are good whereas whatever everyone else does regardless if there is anything improper or not is automatically bad.

    So much for smug haughtiness. It never ends with some. They hypocrisy just continues to drip.

    in reply to: Are anti trumpers actual liberals? #1924581
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    Health – I get it. You are anti-abortion but pro-idolatry. Totally politics based in religion. Not sure why abortion occupies you so much but not idolatry. I know when it is convenient easy to pick and choose. Does not sound like anything based in the Torah rather just some cult-like mentality.

    Btw, love how you simply ignore that you are all over the place. One comment you are talking about American History and the next you forgot all about it. It almost seems you just spout whatever thought comes to mind in the hope that something sticks.

    in reply to: Are anti trumpers actual liberals? #1924400
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    Health – so you are just avoiding the issue rather than confronting the inherent contradiction.

    As to the rest about the founding of this country… You should read Thomas Paine. Might “enlighten” you a bit. He was pretty influential in his philosophy that guided the forming of American Democracy in case you are unaware. You clearly took a child’s course in American history but never bothered learning more than that. It would be cute if you were still a child.

    in reply to: Are anti trumpers actual liberals? #1924259
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    Wow Health lots of anger in that post. You help show that the point of this post in the first place was to heap your righteous indignation on the Libs. What I appreciate that you have clearly shown is the ideological nature of whatever it is that you consider your political ideology is. Definitely it is not based in religion as you would be very opposed to freedom of religion which allows people to worship idols which is an affront to God. It is simply ridiculous how you decide that being anti-abortion is your religious calling and eradicating idolatry is not important. Clearly your politics are not based in Judaism. Maybe they are based in Limbaughism which has morphed into Trumpism.

    in reply to: “Give me liberty or give death”! #1924204
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    TVP, you are focused on a subset of the issues and thereby it is easy to spout what you are spouting.

    Science is not simple and is evidence based (which means that opinions will change, such as with masking, how much of a shut-down, how long to quarantine, and whether schools can be safely kept open).

    In March we saw a virus that spread very quick and was quickly overwhelming hospitals. The reaction to shut things down was conceived then, based on what other places had done already.

    Over the following months and even currently we see a virus that does not seem as bad or perhaps the treatment is better. Very hard to say.

    But history will tell you, that during the Spanish Flu Pandemic there were multiple waves and each one had differing outcomes. To assume this virus can’t get worse is simply ignorant.

    All very nice for one person to say it is no big deal. Most Doctors who study this don’t have that naive confidence you and others do. It would seem that they advocate keeping social distancing, wearing masks and trying to mitigate the virus until a vaccine can be introduced and we see transmission go effectively to zero. Oh, and that vaccine is probably more likely to be effective the less strains of COVID-19 going around… Another reason to reduce transmission outside a vaccine as it will likely make that vaccine more effective and allow life, for those impacted by this, to get back to normal.

    The flip side, like you, you can disagree. But let’s consider the consequence if the virus turns as bad as it was back in March or perhaps turns worse. The more people that have the virus and the less careful they are the more opportunity for deadly strains to emerge and spread.

    Really, your complaints and whining about this, should have you consider this instead on a societal level and talk with doctors that are concerned about this and try to understand why. Of course, it is easy to sit in shul and ignore the numerous people who died (I kept track of the people I know that died from this and the number is staggering high in our community! We failed. There is nothing to be proud of how we dealt with this, unless you live in some sick and twisted world where having so many die and being the hardest hit community, probably in the world by this, is something to be proud of) and say the high-risk should lock themselves up and everyone else make believe everything is great.

    in reply to: Are anti trumpers actual liberals? #1924194
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    You want to know what political viewpoints Democrats have or you want to heap on viewpoints you disagree with.
    How about what political viewpoints you hold other than admiring Trump:

    Lack of education opportunities for many thereby resulting in a dumber workforce and falling behind in the advances America makes?
    Less taxes and a bigger deficit then Trump’s tax cuts already caused? Or tax policies that correlate with increasing economic inequity and the societal unrest that economic inequity is associated with (I know… Those jealous people are wrong… But they are still there)… Myself I do just fine economically and would most likely pay more tax under liberal policies, so not my direct personal financial interest here… Well, other than I think too much economic inequity can also be bad for the economy, whereas reducing it can be beneficial for the economy, so that would be good for me.
    Less regulations thereby allowing companies to pollute dangerously and not be responsible for their actions causing society to suffer higher medical costs and dealing with the negative consequences.
    No immigration thereby preventing employers from getting necessary workers (and justifying FDR’s actions in sending Jews to their deaths by closing borders)?
    Not recognizing racism and allowing schisms in society to fester and grow causing untold harm to current and future generations?
    Not recognizing issues with police and making sure they understand they need to respect the rights of those they police. How long did it take in Germany for a wonderful police force to be a participant in the most horrific crimes?
    Anti-abortion and having the government intrude in private lives in a way the vast majority in this country don’t want (you want freedom of religion including ability for people to bow down to idols a serious sin, yet you want the Government to intrude in private lives with issues such as abortion… seems hypocritical… For the record I am very much pro freedom of religion and think the government should not get involved in abortion as most people in this country prefer)?
    Blindly, pro the 2nd amendment, without any sensible limitations, and having a country with one of the worst gun related casualty rates (crime and otherwise).
    Iran Deal??? – Does anyone here actually have the necessary info other than limited info that has been fed to them to even access whether this is good or bad? I definitely don’t. Not even sure why this is a political issue, rather it should be a question whether it is effective or not. Trump decided it was a political issue because before he was in office and had access to the necessary classified info he was decrying it. I have zero confidence that Trump’s actions in regard to it were based on actual intelligence and rather they were based on a campaign promise and his despise of Obama. All you need to think this way is to listen to pretty much everyone that worked with Trump and what they say about him afterwards.
    Etc?

    in reply to: Olam Haboh #1924158
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    Are you answering your question or just explaining why the feeling should not have been created? I mean it can go either way here.

    in reply to: If Trump does win, how would you react…? #1923564
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    Lin Wood and Sydney Powell have been given the chance to present evidence and have not presented anything that holds up. Why anyone should believe them now is ridiculous. How many times do you get to lie and get tossed out of court before people call you a liar?

    The explanation for why…

    Cults have a way of making people do crazy things that don’t make sense otherwise. It destroys who you are as a person. Not unlike how so many fine Jews have become purveyors of lying because of their desire to be part of the Trump cult. If you would leave the Trump cult you would be able to regain your humanity and be a better person.

    in reply to: U.S. Supreme Court opinion supports freedom of religion #1923552
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    I have no idea how excited to get about this victory. For one, it simply informs the State how to write their rules differently to avoid the specific issues the Supreme Court addressed. Two, the restrictions addressed are no longer in place. And three, the majority decision seemingly leaves open the possibility that if the State can show that religious gatherings from a viral transmission standpoint are a greater issue then the restrictions may very well be proper (i.e. this has to go through the appeals court for the Supreme Court to give a ruling on the actual merits… This is just an injunction).

    in reply to: why did our conservative news site go liberal? #1923550
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    Calling the YWN liberal is a surely a joke. I guess since Trump decided that Fox News is not enough of a sycophant the so-called conservatives here (really they are Trump cultists) are all on OANN and Brietbart and now think that even generic right-wing stuff is liberal.

    in reply to: Tucker Carlson Election Fraud Evidence #1922623
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    Health – This is insane already. This belief in Trump and the lies Rudy is saying is making you crazy. It is time to move on. The other day you were defending Powell’s lies, and since then even Trump found it too much and distanced himself from her. As to Gay Marriage and Abortion, that is law already. It is unlikely to change. As a Yid, do you even have an obligation to enforce such laws on others? What about laws that allow idolatry? Are you concerned that freedom of religion allows that? There is no perfect side and I think all we can do is do what we think best so we can live peacefully.

    in reply to: Tucker Carlson Election Fraud Evidence #1922476
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    OD… Health has been ranting since the election about fraud (and his friend Syag has also asked why are folks not concerned about fraud)… The thing is, despite the microscope Trump has taken to this election and their desperate attempts to find fraud, all they have come up with are a few affidavits that when you examine them don’t say much. If anything, this election has shown how little fraud there was and that we can safely use mail-in ballots. If anything, Trump’s crack legal team has shown that this election was very secure and worked right. I know they set out to prove fraud, but instead they have had to go super crackpot and ignore reality to make their fraud claims, because they just did not exist otherwise.

    In any case, there is no arguing rationally with these people, because despite all the evidence (or lack thereof) they persist in fantasy.

    You want to discuss policies or what is good for America or even for Jews? They are so deep in a cult of Trumpism, which really, just brings out the worst in people. I mean, Yidden embracing lying and disgusting behavior is just so ridiculous. I seriously hope these people realize that Trump and the movement around him is a terrible thing and they are able to get out of it. As much as politics prior to Trump got people riled up, I never recall it reaching the level of hatred that has been espoused by those supporting Trump. We were all better people before Trump. He made his supporters worse people, with worse middos. It is time for people to realize that and leave behind their support for Trump.

    in reply to: If Trump does win, how would you react…? #1921694
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    @torahvaluesoverparty

    I was wondering yesterday before the highly touted news conference if there was some bombshell about to be unloaded… Then I watched the news conference (until that third person started going on a diatribe against the press and everyone who is supportive of Biden) and they just rehashed “evidence” that was tossed out of court as not being evidence and claiming they have evidence that they can’t show us. And then they made crazy claims about Biden overseeing a massive fraud operation and some other nutty stuff.

    So yeah, basically, I realized they have no evidence and are just making stuff up.

    in reply to: Tucker Carlson Election Fraud Evidence #1921678
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    Rudy – Hand recounts will not change anything

    Powell – The computer system counting the votes changed the numbers

    Explain how these two positions are consistent.

    in reply to: Election Fraud #1921674
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    Even a Trumpard like Tucker Carlson called out Powell for not providing a shred of evidence.

    Nevermind the contradictions about how recounts won’t help but the software in the original count switched votes.

    If you are suggesting that this news conference provides anything worth going on, then you are simply way too out there to be reasoned with.

    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    Daas Yachad – I took a look back at her comments and it seem pretty clear that her implications is that Biden supporters are mean. Maybe she can clarify that she only meant Biden supporters who are upset or concerned at Trump’s attempt to overturn and steal an election and in general undermine democracy are mean.

    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    @rational jew – Rudy was on TV yesterday accusing Biden of orchestrating a massive voter fraud scheme of a scale that is unprecedented. Once a guy goes off making accusations like that, without some pretty darn good evidence, I kind of feel I can probably ignore the rest of his claims.

    How about the contradictions offered by this news conference:

    Rudy – the recount in GA won’t change anything
    Powell – the software used (in the original count) switched votes to Trump

    If Powell is correct then Rudy is wrong and if Rudy is correct then Powell is wrong. This is classic Mein Kampf garbage where you make competing contradicting claims, because your supporters just don’t care about the truth.

    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    @Syag – you want an adult conversation then stop with the implied insults.

    Take your last comment, in response to se2015. se2015 said not all Trump supporters support his wild conspiracy theories, to which you respond, in effect, that you have been saying that over and over, but “others” (presumably those who dislike Trump here) are too dense to parse this.

    So, am I to understand on Nov 13 when you posted these two brief paragraphs (see below), you did not mean the second sentence?! I mean, if you are actually willing to say what Trump is saying is wild conspiracy theories, then you would seem to agree that if a Judge said stop the certification because Trump said this or that, that is a problem. Or is it, that you simply adjust every comment you make to insult the other side? When you stop with your implied insults, couched in holier than thou language, I perhaps might find your comments a bit more tolerable. Until then, I will feel free to call you out for your constant insults.

    ““If the election officials say there was little or no fraud – as they have all done – then the election officials are deemed corrupt. If the Judges reject the ‘evidence’, then the Judges are corrupt. ”

    Yes, and if the judgesaccept than they are trump’s puppets. At least be honest and acknowledge that it goes both ways.”

    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    @Withheld – when you are in a cult it is very hard to acknowledge that fact. If you ever manage to leave it, well then, you won’t need anyone explaining it to you.

    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    @syag “ummm, no. not even for pretend”

    Denial is the first of five stages of grief. Hope you don’t spend the next 4 years stuck there.

    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    @jackk – Well said! If the Trump cultists here would listen to what you would say we could maybe bring folks together.

    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    @Syag – Congrats on another insult post insinuating that everyone that supports Biden is somehow mean. As they say, if you live in a glass house don’t throw stones. Still waiting to see a comment from you on substance, rather than your consistent implications that those who supported Biden in this election are just somehow bad people. At least be honest with what you are doing and stop playing victim. Probably asking too much.

    in reply to: Election Fraud #1920290
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    Not Jesse Jones, the name is Jesse Jacobs. Mixed up the name, but should have been clear as that was the case in MI and I mentioned the name previously.

    Everything else stands.

    As this is so difficult for you, as you just keep on repeating Trump’s rhetoric (which the style of he gets from Mein Kampf), Joe Biden is president-elect. You want to dispute that, show the evidence or legal arguments. So far you have shown zero.

    in reply to: Election Fraud #1920153
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    @Honest to follow-up to my prior comment (not published yet) on Nov 13 the court addressed the Jesse Jones affidavit and explains why the allegations are garbage. In that case the request for injunctive relief was tossed out. So go on, keep on posting nonsense, it is reflecting poorly on you at this point.

    in reply to: Election Fraud #1920151
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    @Health – All you spouted at me is Jesse Jones’s opinion about things, not a single factual statement. Thankfully, just because you can’t tell the difference between factual testimony versus opinion, does not mean a judge cannot. I stand by my prior comment, nowhere did Jesse Jones offer testimony that ballots received after they were allowed to be received were backdated.

    At what point are you going to give this up that this so-called evidence of widescale fraud you think there is just has not been put out there yet.

    I think I have had it with this conversation as it is ridiculous that you have yet to offer something that is even debatable, rather you have just offered clearly wrong information, and it is frankly annoying to be a fact-checker for claim after claim being made. It should be abundantly clear by now to anyone interested in this that anything you say is suspect and most likely false.

    I will just leave off with reminding you that Joe Biden is the President-elect. You want to challenge this provide actual legal arguments that have some merit or evidence that challenges this presumption. So far you have offered nothing.

    in reply to: Should Trump run again in 2024 #1920016
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    When you study WWII history there is this remarkable change after the Nazis were defeated where just about everyone was in-fact opposed to Hitler. Makes it hard to figure who supported him in the first place.

    Now, I am not saying Trump is anything like Hitler in his objectives, however in terms of trying to gain power there are many similarities. Much like the people of Germany turned away from one populist demagogue after he lost, I suspect in 4 years many of you deny ever having liked Trump in the first place.

    in reply to: Election Fraud #1920011
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    @Syag – Do you lack reading comprehension as well? You have not said anything of substance, just insults. Those are not points worth debating.

    in reply to: Election Fraud #1919998
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    @turahvaluesoverparty – well then you just made a great argument for why Trump was guilty of all the crimes he has been accused of. He obstructed and the GOP did their best to stop investigations into him. That shows anyone that he must be guilty. Also he refused to show his tax return, which further shows he is guilty.

    Btw, in Georgia they are doing a full hand count of the vote, and guess what… That’s right, Trump realized the audit there was not going his way, so now on to the next reason why elections that he loses should not count.

    @Syag – In all this talk about Biden and Trump, never once do I recall you ever contributing with a substantive argument. Instead it is all holier than thou, statements that are intended to insult the person you direct it against. I welcome you actually joining the conversation and adding something of substance, but I suspect that when you get beneath the fragile exterior there is little holding up the insides and not much to offer. Maybe tone done the gaivah a bit and actually discuss issues and dare I say, accept the possibility you may very well be wrong.

    in reply to: His Fraudulency, Joe Biden Junior #1919996
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    @Ben Levi – It is ridiculous that you still persist here.

    Let’s make this very easy as apparently you and some others are having trouble with basic facts and legalities.

    1. Alan Dershowitz, regardless of whether I agree with his opinion or not, said to Brietbart (which anyone talking to Brietbart I have serious doubts about) that IF the segregated ballots can make a difference THEN the supreme court could take it up. In that case he thinks Trump has a good case. Just remember the IF. There has to be enough ballots at issue before the Supreme Court would take this up, per Alan Dershowitz.

    2. PA officials have said that there is only about 10,000 segregated votes.

    3. Joe Biden leads in PA by about 67,000 votes.

    So let’s put this together. If somehow the segregated votes were not counted the most that could happen is Biden’s lead goes from 67,000 to 57,000. Biden still wins. So no, what Alan Dershowitz said would not be a valid legal argument in this election, since it clearly does not apply.

    So for the umpteenth time, Joe Biden is still president-elect. No one has presented any legal arguments nor evidence that calls this into question.

    And finally, can we stop with the semantics. It is ridiculous that you think there is an issue calling the clear winner of the election the president-elect. Trump whining about it, or refusing to concede, is ridiculous.

    Oh, as to the lawsuits being frivolous, the one or two that have relevant legal issues are one thing, but the rest are garbage. Going to court saying the count should stop or the vote not be certified because you claim you can, if given enough time, find fraud is getting old. By that logic, anyone who wants to, can contest a vote based on eventually finding fraud and elections would be meaningless.

    To restate, because you and some others are having trouble with this… Joe Biden is the President-elect. You want to deny that, then present evidence or valid legal arguments.

    in reply to: Election Fraud #1919959
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    @Health – read the Jesse Jacobs affidavit and it does not make the claims you claim it makes.

    You said the worker was told to backdate ballots that came in late. This is a very specific claim that if true would be troubling.

    What the affidavit says (easy to find online), and all it says about this, is that on Nov 4 she (he?) was told to input Nov 3 as the receive date for ballots that were not in the QVF.

    This is important, because testimony has to be very specific as otherwise you can say one thing and imply something else. Note, Jesse does not say that ballots that came in late were backdated, what Jesses says is that ballots not in the QVF were dated to Nov 3.

    Nowhere in the affidavit does it state that those ballots came in after Nov 3. Seems to me, someone created an affidavit that attempted to stick to factual statements (because it is a crime to lie in an affidavit) but it was done in an way to imply something illegal happened when in fact the affidavit never makes such a claim.

    Like has been said, easy to make claims on social media another to swear before a judge and make those claims.

    Let us know when you find your evidence or come up with valid legal arguments. Until then Joe Biden is president-elect.

    I was already tired of your lies and conspiracy, and you have not made a better case yet.

    in reply to: Election Fraud #1919922
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    @Syag – see you just keep at it. Never a substantive comment from you. Just insults and being sanctimonious. Oh, if you cared about honesty, you would actually go seek out viewpoints that don’t align with yours otherwise you are just living in your own echo chamber. Keep it up. Maybe some more smileys. With Trump losing your comments have increasingly been unhinged. Maybe I should feel bad for you.


    @Health
    – Richard Hopkins when questioned admitted he has no knowledge of any fraud. He heard a part of a sentence and assumed a lot. I really don’t care what he then says on social media when there is no legal consequence. I grow tired of you repeating lies and conspiracy. You have evidence or legal arguments show it.

    Until then, Joe Biden is President-elect.

    Not so hard to comprehend.

    in reply to: His Fraudulency, Joe Biden Junior #1919826
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    @Ben Levi – let me reiterate… Joe Biden is the President-Elect. Simple as that.

    You don’t like it, please let us know what legal arguments or evidence you have so that we should consider otherwise. So far, there has not been a single legal argument or any evidence presented that could possibly change this result. How difficult is this to understand? Have you ever learned a blatt Gemara? How difficult is it to realize that there is nothing of substance that has been presented here.

    As to the lawsuits… the lawsuits… the ones that keep on getting tossed out of court… Those? Yeah, until Trump can provide the evidence or legal arguments those lawsuits are irrelevant and probably should be considered frivolous.

    Face it, Joe Biden won the election.

    Oh, if it makes it easier for you, in some of these states at issue, the legislatures have said they have no plans to break state law by certifying a slate of electors who will vote for Trump, so that avenue is pretty much shut (assuming it was not a dead-end to begin with).

    in reply to: Election Fraud #1919818
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    @Syag – kind of hard to take you serious. By my count you are the most sanctimonious holier than thou person here who is so sure her (his?) viewpoint is so right that you never actually engage in anything substantive rather every comment is essentially an insult. I can repeat what I said earlier to explain what I said, but obviously you are not interested in debate, rather you are just interested in extolling how anyone who sees things differently than you is clearly a hypocrite and wrong.

    I guess kind of hard to debate on the substantive issues when you are so in the wrong.

    I recall Doug Collins (probably someone you like as he is a Trump loving Republican) saying a well-known phrase, when the facts are on your side state the facts, when the law is on your side state the law, when neither is on your side, pound the table. Seems like you have been stuck pounding the table for a while.

    in reply to: Election Fraud #1919641
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    @Syag – wow! another insult from you, this time directed towards me, where you offer nothing of substance beyond your insult. Seems like a middah of Trump. Just insult, lie, and slander and when the basis for everything he says is examined it is false.

    Congrats. You showed me.


    @ujm
    – So to be clear when you say “eat what you sow”, you mean you don’t care about Democracy. Because not sure how else that is intended.

    Also I have to wonder…. The Republican led Senate issued a massive report that concluded that Russia interfered in the 2016 election. Trump said he did not read the report (not surprising). That report and the FBI investigation into Russian interference led to actions to reduce Russian interference in the 2020 election. So rather than undermine democracy it helped make it stronger.

    So the Republicans concluded that Russia was a threat to independent US elections and yet you, say this is a Democrat claim as if to suggest this is one-sided.

    Maybe actually go get facts rather than repeating whatever Donald Trump, Hannity, or Carlson told you.

    in reply to: His Fraudulency, Joe Biden Junior #1919638
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    @Ben Levi

    Please let us know what legal arguments have been presented that can possibly change the legal result of the election?

    Saying there may be legal arguments or some guy behind a landscaping saying so, does not give any basis to say the projection of the winner could be wrong.

    Let’s stop with this nonsense as your point is simply ridiculous.

    To be clear, Joe Biden won the election. Not if, or but. You want to challenge that assertion, provide legal arguments or evidence that can change this. So far, neither you, nor Trump, nor Giuliani, nor Hannity, nor Carlson have done so.

    @Syag – How do you say what you said with a straight face. You seem to have just skipped to the final state that Biden stole the election and skipped the intervening steps. Maybe that is why you don’t like jackk’s comment.

    in reply to: Election Fraud #1919616
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    @Syag – You are wrong.

    At this point anyone supporting Trump here hates Democracy.

    Trump is making claims of widescale fraud without evidence. If he did that against you that would be called libel and slander. Instead he is doing this against voting, which is one of the most fundamental aspects of democracy. As president he is sworn to defend our democracy.

    In simple words, Trump is committing Treason.

    Not conceding the election, going to court is all fine, but to cast allegations, because Trump feels this way, without any firsthand knowledge or evidence is simply committing libel and slander against Democracy itself. Trump is a Traitor. You are supporting a Traitor. You must hate Democracy.

    At least be honest and acknowledge that you want an authoritarian regime.

    in reply to: His Fraudulency, Joe Biden Junior #1919417
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    Congrats to Joe Biden President-Elect!

    I apologize for the imbeciles here who are already talking about impeaching you. On what basis, I don’t know. But then again, these folks lack ability to think and they act solely based on their feelings even if those feelings are formed by lies. Maybe one day they will realize that having a President that does not bring out the worst in people is a good thing. Not counting on it though.

    in reply to: Election Fraud #1919270
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    @ujm – I don’t think the GSA should consider this disputed, because one side who has not presented evidence nor made valid legal arguments says it is in dispute. It is pretty clear Trump lost.

    @Old Crown Heights – listened to a bunch of that interview and the bottom line is the guy heard a blurb and assumed a lot of things. He did change his affidavit and clarified what was assumption vs what he heard. As to what he heard it is nothing near as damning as what the original affidavit suggested.


    @ujm
    – Can you not spread fake news about what Bill Barr did. He did not start an investigation, rather he changed department policy, with no reason other than Trump is upset, to allow certain investigations to proceed. Note, it was policy that was changed, not that there are actual investigations ongoing.


    @rightwriter
    – Hillary never said it the way you suggested. She just said if the election is close Biden should not concede as Trump will try to interfere with the absentee ballots. In any case, Hillary was not running for election, and her one comment about not conceding is a ridiculous basis for Trump’s deplorable actions alleging fraud when he has not presented evidence of such widescale fraud.


    @Health
    – you are just lying about what the postal worker was told. Hopkins never claimed being told to backdate things (he does not even know how to do postmarks) rather he said that some people backdated things. What he recanted was that he only heard a snippet of conversation and he assumed it meant they backdated things. The conversation he heard is not even clear that it was discussing backdating and would not go anyplace in court without other evidence. His affidavit is just hearsay.

    Finally, rather than spreading fake news and just lying about things, why not go look at the facts. In PA only about 10,000 ballots were received after the close of the polls. If all those ballots were tossed out, Biden still wins. So these allegations about backdating and whatnot are simply irrelevant if you want to say the election was affected by voter fraud. Provide the evidence or you are just a liar who is in denial about reality.

    I know I said I will step out of this conversation before but felt a need to respond to some of these comments. I assume you, if you want to continue with lies, can come up with more and more irrelevant points and lies to continue this. I think for anyone thinking who looks at all this, it is clear who is making up lies and who is trying to stick to the truth. I think it is safe to say any responses from the side that has been lying consistently here will just be more lies and there is no further need to respond to them.

    in reply to: Election Fraud #1919021
    emes nisht sheker
    Participant

    @Old CH – You can interpret a clip how you want. An inspector explaining that we are going to pressure you so if your story is a fabrication you will let it slip, is not pressuring him to retract his affidavit if true. I have had the FBI in my office with regard to an ex-client who was under investigation and this is standard. They ask you questions to fish out discrepancies.

    Regarding Benford’s law. It is very difficult and controversial to apply to elections so not sure where you get with that. In any case in PA, WI, GA, and AZ the first two leading digits for both Biden and Trump are the same. In MI, it is different. Not really sure how Benford’s law reveals anything significant here. So maybe stop with this nonsense which you clearly understand nothing about.

    I am done with this conversation as the intellectual level of those supporting Trump here is in serious question.

Viewing 50 posts - 201 through 250 (of 272 total)