Daniel Rosen

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 51 through 100 (of 111 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948658
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    Yes, certainly they are. What is your point and how is that relevant to what I just said?

    In my yeshiva high school, we were not allowed to wear brand named clothes to school for this very reason.

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948656
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    Yes of course there are better quality products that would behoove one to spend the extra dollar and purchase. There are other products however called luxury products that cost thousands of dollars extra for little or no benefit apart from affording one a high social status- the superior quality of the product is illusory. B”H we have many reviews online to research in order to ascertain if Product A costs hundreds of dollars more than Product B primarily due to it’s superior quality and durability or due to the status it affords and the illusion of superior quality to a substantial degree.

    It is clear and obvious that a Gucci Pocketbook costs thousands of dollars more due to the status it affords. Therefore, it is immoral to purchase one. Even if you somehow manage to get it for cheaper, you are contributing the the “high status” persona and will force other women to purchase them as well in order to keep up.

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948651
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    Sam2: Join the good side. I stand here with open arms.

    First: Who said anything about looking poor, I never mentioned that.

    Second: “Thus, ANYONE who wore such a style was considered to be flaunting a high social status which the Sages deemed ostentatious.”

    ~Aryeh Kaplan

    I have to go for now, perhaps I will come back here tom. All the best for now, kol tov.

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948649
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    Sam2: This is the third time you have asked me to cite a source when you have yet to cite one source. But as you requested and to the further detriment of your argument…..:

    Rambam: Deos:Chapter 5, Law 9:

    “His clothes should not drag on the ground like the dress of the haughty, but [should extend] to the heel and his sleeves [should extend] to his fingers. He should not let his cloak hang down, for that creates an impression of haughtiness”

    “First of all, clothes were basically long robes in the Rambam’s and Talmud’s day. The Rambam here states that long clothes which reach the ground are typical of the arrogant. Likewise, letting down one’s robe (from being hitched up at the belt) is a sign of arrogance. The basic idea is that lengthy clothes were impractical for the working class, as they interfered with manual labor. The wealthy leisure classes, who needed not work themselves, typically wore such clothes as a sign of their status. Thus, anyone who wore such a style was considered to be flaunting a high social status which the Sages deemed ostentatious.” ~Aryeh Kaplan

    Mishpachashu: Thank you!

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948645
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    I am merely repeating what my Roshe Yeshiva says every other day in yeshiva. If you walk into any black hat (i.e. high level) yeshiva you will hear the same thing. I do not know why you are surprised by what I am saying. My chavrusa even gave me tochacha for moving into a 2 bedroom apartment! He said “cant you make by in a 1 bedroom”. If you think I am radical, try joining kollel and see what the real talmedei chachamim have to say about our dor and the destruction geiva and taiva has caused. My Roshe Yeshiva said that the amount of money our dor waist on things is “sick and perverted”.

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948644
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    kkls45: Irrelevant to the overall point of the thread.

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948642
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    kkls45: It is certainly not ridiculous (but we already went there).

    Sam2: Enough of this nonsense. Please put aside your ego and don’t try to argue only because you refuse to lose a machloches. It’s over, truly. Talk to your rav about this as I have with mine before you comment again, please I beg of you.In fact, it was my very rav that constantly beings this issue up in the first place.

    I have read Mesilas Yesharim probably 40 or so times by now. We learn it for our mussar seder everyday in yeshiva.

    I know there are various madreigos to climb, such as not socializing at all and fasting. Spending thousands of dollars on elegant clothing is not in that category. I cannot have a rational conversation with you if you believe that. The Rambam says it is pashut no one should wear these things.

    in reply to: Capital Punishment #951523
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    Rabbi Akiva still intended that murderers would be indirectly killed by locking them away and starving them before giving them barley that would expand their stomach and kill them. Thus, there would be a deterrent against murder. In no way did R’ Akiva mean that there should be no deterrent against murder.

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948640
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    From saksfifthavenue.com:

    Gucci

    Sukey Medium Guccissima Tote Bag: $1580.00

    Lustrous logo-stamped leather takes on a metallic sheen in this softly-pleated carryall finished with logo hardware.

    Top snap-strap closure

    One inside zip pocket

    Linen lining

    Made in Italy

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948637
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    cv: No one (or nearly no one) does that. Even if they did:

    Suppose they paid $1500 for the Gucci pocketbook. Surely they could have gotten a very nice one for somewhere between $50-150.

    That leaves $1400 spent on luxury. That alone could pay for shabbos chicken for a poor family in EY for 2 entire years according to the chickens for shabbos website. If they did not wish to give the money to tzedaka, to save the money instead would certainly allow the husband and children to be able to devote more time to talmud Torah.

    Besides the point, when other women see her with the bag they will feel the desire to get one themselves….and on goes the cycle until it effects the entire community. Baruch Hashem we have Mesilas Yesharim to warn us of this. So I repeat, yes I do believe it to be immoral to purchase a Gucci bag- perhaps it is even lifnei iver though that is a discussion for another thread. Not even those admist the lowest madreigos of klal yisroel should be content with needing such things. This is clear and pashut to anyone who reads so much as one mussar sefer with an honest eye.

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948635
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    The Artscroll Mesorah Series of Pirkei Avos says in one of the commentaries that people should give more tzedaka instead of spend extra things on themselves. Rov Nosson Scherman goes onto say how the yetzer harah tries to deceive people into spending money on luxuries for themselves and how it is wrong to live such a lifestyle. Is that judgmental as well?

    If we threw out all the mussar seforim that view people’s lifestyles with a critical eye in the hopes of getting them to make changes then we would have none left.

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948634
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    Sam2: “So who are you to tell others where they’re holding”

    There are no steps mentioned here. This is the most basic of steps. We are not talking about making a taanis every Monday and Thursday! We are talking about trying to get klal yisroel to stop iving like goyim: it is called mussar and is appropriate for all madreigos. To say that this does not reflect the message of mesilas yesharim comes from ignorance. I am judging no one. I am addressing the general public about our ideals. Why does this bother you. You are saying I cannot judge others because some people are not on the level of “abstaining” from Gucci and you call me “ridiculous”.

    “You are living like gentiles. Your homes are hardly different from the homes of the gentiles.” Do you think Rav Moshe Feinstein, Rav Aharon Kotler, or one of the Chassidic rebbes would come in with his wife to eat in such a place? Of course not! Would our Avos have gone to such places?”

    R’ Itamar Schwartz

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948632
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    Sam2: “There’s no Issur here. This is ridiculous. Read the introduction to Mesilas Yesharim. Nothing in there is an obligation or a Halachic statement.”

    I’m sorry you do not believe that Mesilas Yesharim ought to be followed. Unfortunately for you there is not one orthodox Rabbi that agrees with you or thinks that this topic is ridiculous.

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948626
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    Sam2: “Um, that says stay away from your neighbors’ worldly goods, not tell them to get rid of theirs.”

    That is incorrect. To whom do you propose Mesilas Yesharim is intended to address in the first place when it says “do not buy luxury goods”. To all of klal yisroel of course: as am I. Certainly, the article yytz was kind enough to source fervently condems people who purchase luxury goods. He even takes it a step further and says that the goods we purchase as ordinary are in fact luxury. Someone has to say “The Party Is Over”.

    Is it immoral to purchase a Gucci Bag? Yes, it is.

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948624
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    Gamanit: Come on I am trying to address a very serious issue, kindly don’t poke fun at it.

    Though thanks again to yytz. I again point everyone to the essay “Our Generation” by R’ Itamar Schwartz, the author of Bilvavi Mishkan Evneh. It’s on the Bilvavi website.

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948622
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    yytz: Thank you, that is an excellent article. I posted some below:

    “When you come to Heavenly court, remember that someone once told you that this whole way of life is false. Don’t say, “I didn’t know.” I’m not saying this to make you guilty there. But some people have to stand up and say, “Enough! The party is over!

    “There were errors many hundreds of years ago that our rabbis tried to remove. But there are other errors that have surfaced in the last few generations. We are here in a world where every average person has what a wealthy man did not have a thousand years ago. One does not see these as luxuries, but as necessities.

    You are living like gentiles. Your homes are hardly different from the homes of the gentiles.” Do you think Rav Moshe Feinstein, Rav Aharon Kotler, or one of the Chassidic rebbes would come in with his wife to eat in such a place? Of course not! Would our Avos have gone to such places?

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948620
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    “Thing is, you don’t know where she got that Gucci bag or why that woman is cholishing for $500 Manolo shoes. They could be gifts. They could have an uncle in “the biz.” Hullo: thrift shops?”

    I disagree, if someone gives you a Gucci bag as a gift, you need not use it publicly. If someone offered you stolen merchandise or something you thought was ugly, you would likewise refuse or take the gift politely and not use it publicly.

    Sam2 and ws33t: Do you now concede to my argument that is immoral to purchase expensive luxuries (either because it will cause you to give less tzedaka OR because it will cause others to be envious and trap them in a fierce battle)?.

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948616
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    JustHavingFun: “Me? I’m not wasting an extra penny on a logo.”

    beautiful.

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948615
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    “Live and let live.” Has no place in Judaism and is not part of the mesorah of klal yisroel.

    Sam2: “Daniel: Show me where Mesilas Yesharim says it’s your business how others spend their money.”

    I showed you one out of many sources below, now can you show me a source in support of your argument that I should not be concerned when klal yisroel spends vasts amount of money on luxry goods?

    Mesilas Yesharim: “…He will then come to despise them and to realize that he should take from the world only that which is essential to him, as I have written above. But just as thinking upon this truth leads to the acquisition of the trait of Separation, so does ignoring it hinder such acquisition, as does courting the company of those who pursue honor and multiply vanity. For when one regards their elegance and dignity, it is impossible that his lust will not be awakened to desire these things. And even if he will not permit his evil inclination to conquer him, he will, in any event, not escape the battle and its dangers. This is the intent of Solomon’s statement (Ecclesiastes 7:2), “It is better to go to the house of mourning than to the house of feasting.” “Separation and protecting themselves from being led into vanities by those of their neighbors.”

    We see from here that R” Luzzato is concerned not only with himself staying away from luxry goods, but for all of klal yisroel: as am I.

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948610
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    sw33t: But it is. Mesilas Yesharim along with all mussar sefarim say no different.

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948605
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    sw33t: There is no need for harsh words. I merely saw that you were very defensive and knew a significant amount about the merchandise at hand and thus came to a possible conclusion that I related back to you. Perhaps you are angry that, being poor yourself and have never judged others for attaining what you never could are mad that I am. This is another case of a possible conclusion I had and am relating it back to you.

    Look, you can pick the thing out in your own life. Something that you know you are buying not because of an investment or even because you like it more but rather because A) You want to show off or B) You can really do completely without it and can give more money to tzedaka but simply do not care to give more and are content with the amount you have already given.

    What I am saying is no different than what other Rabbis have already said.

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948601
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    sw33t: I never said that. As I said before, there are two issues. I am sorry if I am making you feel guilty or embarrassing you. It was not my intention.

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948600
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    I have read primary sources from Italy (coincidentally where Gucci is produced) from the 17th century that rabonim prohibited Jews from wearing expensive clothing and jewelry in public in order not to arouse jealousy.

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948593
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    The Goq: Perhaps, but do you honestly think that is true? What significant difference do you think there is?

    There are two issues: Spending money on “extra” things that could go to tzedaka which is ok but should be limited and spending money on things that are for status and not for pleasure which is not ok. Your case of spending money on designer brands for the purpose of pleasure exclusively would fall into the former category- though to claim that it is the primary motivation of rov people would be to delude yourself for there are many ways of making such things known to others apart from an outer brand.

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948590
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    “then what they choose to spend it on is their own choice and no one else’s business.”

    That is not correct. It is the business of Hashem: I am simply reminding them of that.

    There are two issues: Spending money on “extra” things that could go to tzedaka which is ok but should be limited and spending money on things that are for status and not for pleasure which is not ok. Your case of spending money on designer brands for the purpose of pleasure exclusively would fall into the former category- though to claim that it is the primary motivation of rov people would be to delude yourself for there are many ways of making such things known to others apart from an outer brand.

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948588
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    Torah613Torah: Yes. Thank you. Kol Yisrael Areivim is not only for lavim- but for all sorts of hashkafa and values. So yes, it would apply here as well.

    Should we point out individuals? No of course not.

    Should we attempt to change society values as a whole? Of course.

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948584
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    sw33t: Do you think the rabonim that ban people from spending too much money on their weddings are wrong and judgmental as well?

    I understand that it is perfectly good to enjoy what Hashem has given us and take pleasure in Olam Hazeh to a certain degree. The reason why a Gucci bag differs from a nice steak is that you are not spending money on pleasure: you are wasting money on status to put yourself over your brother (or in this case sister).

    In short, if I see someone wasting money on brand name cars and bags apposed to getting a Honda, I do judge them. We are supposed to judge favorably in an equal circumstance- not all the time when all evidence points to the contrary.

    So is it immoral to purchase a Gucci bag? In my opinion, yes it is. What do you think?

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948582
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    sw33t: If course I do. You can ask that question to the author of every mussar sefer published since the beginning of time. kol yisrael arevim zeh lazeh. It better to be like Avraham Avinu than Noach, the later caring only about his own mitzvos and not those of others.

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948580
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    We say all the time that people should focus on studying Torah and spend less time on work. Why is saying that people should spend less money on Gucci bags and more money on tzedaka any different? Even if you donate $1,000,000 a year, does that give you the right to waist even $1?

    Of course not.

    in reply to: Brand Names�Wasting Money #948579
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    sw33t: Of course it is my interest that the members of klal yisroel use their body’s and moneys the way Hashem desires. I am not pointing out individual people.

    Why is it that you believe people who spend 1000’s of dollars on Gucci bags give lots of tzedaka? Even if some of those people do (which I don’t believe is true being that there was recently a study that said higher earners give less charity per capita than lower earners) they would be able to give even more without meaningless merchandise.

    in reply to: Give Tzedaka to Yeshiva or Chickens for Shabbos? #939681
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    well, any ideas??

    in reply to: Give Tzedaka to Yeshiva or Chickens for Shabbos? #939678
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    I don’t understand: I guess student’s tuition and constant fundraisers still doesn’t cover yeshiva costs? Yes, it is possible. I honestly don’t know what to do and I don’t think it’s as easy as looking it up in the shulchan aruch. I desperately want to do the right thing and it is a very difficult situation to be in.

    in reply to: Give Tzedaka to Yeshiva or Chickens for Shabbos? #939675
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    DaasYochid: Because I want opinions as to what to do.

    in reply to: Internet's Effects on Talmud Torah #936633
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    “But what about all those guys who were always considered so smart in their yeshiva but are now not needed anymore?”

    I would imagine that if they are learning Torah lishma they would not care about others no longer being dependent on their knowledge and know-how and take pleasure in the fact that they are being osek in talmud Torah without external rewards. Perhaps this will make their learning all the more meaningful. What else can we do, ban the smart phone apps and yutorah.org?

    in reply to: Ivy League Yeshivos #934330
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    The main difference is that college is meant to achieve cold hard results. The Ivy League colleges are in theory going to produce better results. They will produce better doctors to heal people and better engineers to build buildings. That is why the term Ivy League is appropriate. The point of a yeshiva is not to produce cold hard results. It is meant to be mekayim a mitzvah. It is meant to allow people to fulfill their tafkid in life and achieve a personal relationship with Hashem.

    in reply to: Ivy League Yeshivos #934329
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    “L’fum Tzara Agra is not limited to Torah, but rather applies to all aspects of life, including a non-Jew.”

    No it doesn’t. In the eyes of secular society it has no or little bearing on people in secular universities.

    No one is buying it “Talmud”, I think everyone is maskim this is a pointless post that is indicative of geiva. What good can possibly come from this? All you are going to do is cause some young bochrim to either feel bad about staying at their “yeshiva for stupid people” or leave it and try to get into an “exclusive” one for no reason whatsoever.

    in reply to: Ivy League Yeshivos #934324
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    talmud: I think you are comparing what the goyim call IV League colleges with our yeshivos. I think that is unwise. A high level of learning in yeshiva is learning Torah lishma- sincerity of heart is the ikar. For Limud chol- a high level of learning is how smart you are. I think you are confusing “cream of the crop” with exclusivity and natural intelligence. Secular colleges have no concept of l’fum tzara agra. In yeshiva, the cream of the crop are those that try hardest. Are there different levels? Yes of course but that is not the ikar. Yes, there is a yeshiva near me that accepts only those that can learn on a certain level. But everyone knows that many of the kids there are only book smart and they go to college parties at night. That’s why you can’t compare yeshiva to college.

    Are you in an exclusive yeshiva “Talmud”? Are you the cream of the crop?

    PS: Everyone knows that the exclusive yeshiva I am referring to gives preferential treatment to people if they are rich or if their father has status in the community. I know this because I see this happen in my yeshiva at least several times a year. A yeshiva like Shor Yoshuv on the other hand is well known and respected for accepting most people while maintaining their standards. It is not one or the other.

    in reply to: Software to Slow Down Shiur Speed #959410
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    Get the Sansa Clip plus (I like it better than the zip). You can get the 4GB version for 40 bucks at B & H. It’s tiny and can clip onto anything. It also has an expandable memory SD Card slot so you can put shas on there. It even has a voice recorder so you can clip it onto your belt and record shiurim.

    You can put the files you want to listen to in the audio books folder (even if they are in regular mp3 format) and then when you play them you will have the option to listen to the shiurim at slower, original or faster speeds.

    in reply to: Yeshiva or College #934434
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    Thank you for all of your replies I read all of them and they are all very much appreciated. Torah613Torah: “If you value Torah, you will value it no matter what you do…Hashem gives the parnasa.”

    So are you saying that I should or I should not go to grad school?

    My father own a small shoe store. He says I can work there with him making 40-50k a year (and perhaps more in the future if I somehow manage to expand the store) and I can learn Torah until the afternoon OR I can take out loans to go to law school or another graduate program (I have a bachelors in psych) and make a lot more money.

    What do you think I should do? I really need advice.

    in reply to: Benefiting from Stolen Property #931716
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    Obviously there are halachos both deoreisa and derobanan (it is assur to assist in an avera) but I am curious if anyone knows a chiddush from a posek or a meisa that happened they could share.

    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    Health:

    Oh, I know how Halacha views the system and that’s why I said -“That’s nice -So what?”

    “I know Halacha and our Court system probably better than you.

    Save your Mercy for this girl for s/o that deserves it.

    Her parents failed on the job and they probably by now realize it – so they should help her out financially and anyway they can.”

    One may not accept an akkum (gentile) as judge. The Shach immediately qualifies this halacha.

    One may not be mekabel (accept) and indeed kabala does not help, is the institution of Arkhaoth. The institution of gentile courts, the institution of gentile law, the acceptance of the gentile judicial system is something we cannot accept. The acceptance of the system of Arkhaoth is pure issur, and hence making a condition to contravene the Torah will be of no avail, because with issurim, obviously, his condition has no validity.

    This may be the meaning of a seemingly strange equation posited by R’ Yosef B’khor Shor who says the following:

    “Our Rabbis interpreted be judged ‘before them’ and not ‘before the judges of the gentiles.’ For just as it is written ‘from amongst your brothers you shall appoint to yourself a King,’ (Deut. 17:15) likewise the Torah warns not to appoint a gentile judge on Israel.”

    In other words, the halacha puts the stress on not accepting the institution of nochrim (non-Jews). Whether we deal with political institutions or judicial institutions – Arkhaoth – it is the institution of Nochrim that we may not accept upon ourselves.

    I took that from R”Simcha Krauss. This is relevant because you are the one arguing that the secular court has the moral authority to do whatever they want. I am not trying to embarrass you but please see how foolish you are being. Every new statement you make like “I know more halacha and about the secular courts than you do” or “what the judge did is just like ones father hitting him” simply makes you look uneducated both in regard to halacha & hashkafa. I am not trying to embarrass you and sorry if I did.

    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    Health: I am just going to let you continue talking……

    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    Gamanit: “I don’t know how many of you realized this though- that wasn’t a regular courtroom setting. She was wearing a prisoners uniform and another girl was waiting in line behind her.”

    Yes, the reason she was wearing a uniform is because it was only a bond hearing. The point of a bond hearing is typiclly to tell if the defendant is a flight risk and how by what means the money will be obtained. In FL bond hearings are held within 24 hrs of the arrest.

    Health: “That’s nice -So what?”

    I was explaining how halacha views the secular court system. I think my point was faily obvious. I am sorry you did not understand it.

    “Her being rude to the system is Ok. This is shown by demonstrating in front of State legislators or in front of Congress.”

    What are you talking about? She is a teenager without a penny to her name. The more I read your statements the less I understand them. Please open your eyes to halacha and the reality of our secular courts.

    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    “Teaching starts before the kids lose control, but afterwards the State steps in. My kids would never act like this to require such punishment!

    If your kids do -then s/o has to teach them and this is what this Judge did.”

    So now you are saying the judge WAS in fact teaching HER personally to have respect.

    But you then agreed with apushatayid who said: “The judge is not responsible to teach the girl respect.”

    Respectfully, please realize your logical inaccuracy.

    “but afterwards the State steps in.” You make this statement as if it is chok and mishpat. My point is that it is not chok and mishpat.

    In fact, a major posek in eretz yisroel Rov Yitzchak Berkowitz tells us it is assur for a Jew to take another Jew to a secular court or have another Jew sent to jail unless there is a real threat of future serious danger. Even then there is a warning required and only if no beis din can handle it. It is not mutar to take “revenge” on someone by bringing them to a secular court if they are no longer a danger. This applies to non-Jews as well if you know they will be hurt or tortured in immoral and unjust courts. You cannot cause harm to another human being in this way.

    The secular court system has no inherent legal authority. It has force- simple as that. If someone, Jew or Gentile, respects that system it is up to them. I see no reason why it would be IMMORAL to show a lack of respect to a court system that took away your liberty when you felt they did not have a right to take away that liberty. Do I believe the court system is often corrupt- yes, I do based on my intimate knowledge of it. Do I think what that judge did was immoral? Yes I do.

    Health: We live in a Dor of “Chutzpa Yasgi” even with Yidden -the Judge taught a lesson”

    Excuse me but you were clearly saying the issue is a derech eretz problem in our society.

    Therefore, this statement “The judge is not responsible to teach the girl respect. Her parents are. His job is to preserve the dignity and decorum of the courtroom.” in response to my statement “”You think what the judge did causes sincere respect?” is illogical.

    apushatayid: “Please correct me if I misunderstand you.”

    I am not going to continue a dialog with you because you accused me on being high on Xanax which shows a lack of basic derech eretz. If someone is rude- all you have to do is ignore them. I don’t know how old you are and I don’t know what yeshiva you go to or if you even attend a yeshiva. But I would bet if you did you would never say a comment like that to someone if people knew who you were behind that computer screen.

    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    Health: So you would teach your child a lesson in having respect by locking her up for 3 months in a small cell with complete strangers and take away 50 weeks of her salary at $200 a week and force her to sell her jewelry to go free?

    This is chinuch to you?

    You are confusing respect with pure fear and terror of people who have the ability to psychologically torture you and ruin your life. You think what the judge did causes sincere respect?

    I agree with you that it is not the judges fault that this is what the constitution calls for (separation of church and state) but that has nothing to do with whether they are entitled to respect due to their position when their position (the American legal system) does not respect Torah and is inherently corrupt. Just because it is not their fault does not entitle them to respect.

    in reply to: Becoming A Rebbetzin #958839
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    Of course being the wife of a Rabbi does not make you rebbetzin. Generally only the wife of a public acting Rov of a community and whatnot is called rebetzin and her husband is called Rabbi. Like we have just seen in another post, calling people “Rabbi” is up to the individual person and many forms of smicha are not accepted/respected by everyone.

    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    oomis: I completely disagree with you. She only cursed at him after he doubled her bail. Derech eretz? For what? Why are secular courts necessarily DESERVING of derech eretz besides the fact that they have people with guns? Do you have any idea how corrupt the court system is?

    “And the law is the law. Even when you think it is frivolous and not in keeping with our own Halacha.”

    Fasle, our halacha determines the framework that the umos haolam are OBLIGATED to follow. “dinei demalchusa…mishum darchei shalom” is basically “they have guns and we don’t so let’s not get killed.”

    The basic concept of any court system the goyim are supposed to create is to not favor the rich over the poor (or poor over the rich). Do you have any idea how much benefits the rich have in our “modern and civilized” court system when they can pay for an expensive lawyer? Certainly without a doubt, I would not want someone who is osek in Torah and mitzvos to go to jail for such a reason and not be able to keep shabbos, learn and daven properly.

    They are by zero means being osek in avodas Hashem. Xanax is assur but public displays of homosexuality and putting up billboards promoting atheism in the middle of Brooklyn is perfectly ok? Imagine if someone kidnapped you and put you in their basement for 30 days until you payed them 50 weeks worth of your pay because you said “adios” and had Xanax. How would you feel?

    Persoanlly, I agree with popa… “I suppose I can’t convince you all, but I think this issue goes straight back to just about everything we discuss here about kids and chinuch. It is bizarre that this little kid is going to jail for doing no harm, and all the reaction society has is “look at that funny video; I bet she learned her lesson good.”

    Don’t get me wrong I cannot stand rude girls like her but that does not give people the right to kidnap her and demand ransom money.

    Mainly though, this is not about what we personally feel. The point I am trying to make is what halacha calls for.

    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    apushatayid “thanks for the laugh”

    How is any of this funny?

    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    “NEVER, and I mean NEVER EVER mouth off to a judge.

    The judge is 100% right.

    Stupid dumb girl.”

    “She needs her mouth washed out with soap.

    Nerve to mouth off to a judge like that.”

    I thought this was a frum environment? What is with all the nivel peh? Especially when you are referring to “mouthing off”.

    It is true I am very thankful to live in these United States with all our liberties and we are surrounded by mostly good people- both Jewish and non-Jewish alike.

    However, included in the sheva mitzvos bnei noach is 1) against the judge discriminating against the litigant because he is a sinner. 2) against the wanton miscarriage of justice by the court. 3) against incrimination by circumstantial evidence. 4) against punishing for a crime committed under duress. 5) ensure the enforcemnet of the other 6 of the sheva mitzvos.

    Our secular courts today DO NOT punish against avodah zara and therefor the judge is perhaps not serving as an “halachic” judge who demands respect in the first place.

    People say “you better show the judge respect”. Is there a reason to show a judge respect other than the fact that there are a lot of guys with guns listening to him and will destroy your life if you don’t?

    Would the same people be saying that about a judge in Nazi Germany? That one should show him respect? What about a judge that is an atheist or supports gay marriage? Do they deserve respect as well simply because there are guys with guns following his orders?

    Because she was a little disrespectful/lightheaded in court the judge doubled her bail which could essentially destroy her life if she doesn’t have the money. Because she perceived her ability to survive as threatened she cursed at the judge instinctively. He then took away her freedom for an entire month. This all happened in the first place because of a non-violent crime. A Jewish dayan in the sanhendrin was obligated to have children of his own because he needed to have rachamim. Where was the rachamim here? Where was the warning? How come he did not first tell her “you need to respect my position and if you don’t I will be forced to double your bail to uphold the dignity of the court”. He never warned her of any of this. That aside, one must show a judge who is doing avodas Hashem the utmost level of respect and to not do so should be punished. Is a judge who is serving in an arguably corrupt court system that is God-less and does not punish against homosexuality or even avodah zara deserving of such respect? I think not.

    in reply to: Kohanim taking out the garbage… #926291
    Daniel Rosen
    Member

    YehudahTzvi: I’m not sure of what you mean but you do not need two kosher eidim to know if someone is a Jew or not (unlike Kohanim). So to compare the two is of no use. The site you mentioned only posts various audio recordings from poskim and sources from the hebrew books website so I’m not sure why someone would say that- do you know who? It is true that we do not have actual smicha today, everyone knows that but I do not know how that relates to this conversation.

Viewing 50 posts - 51 through 100 (of 111 total)