☕ DaasYochid ☕

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 20,101 through 20,150 (of 20,477 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Limericks! #1221433
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Yossi,

    It seems I can not stop thinking

    Even while eating or drinking

    With rhymes times five

    I would like to thrive

    At this limericks a-making

    Anyone have a better ending?

    A tip; sometime with a good rhyme it’s hard to find a good third match – so try switching it to the 3rd and 4th lines. For example:

    I found something at which I thrive

    to write a good limerick I strive.

    I’m constantly thinking,

    while eating and drinking,

    how to do rhyming times five.

    in reply to: Limericks! #1221430
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Yossi, you gave it a crack;

    now you are getting the knack.

    so I am inviting

    you to keep on writing,

    because you are on the right track.

    in reply to: Limericks! #1221429
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Yossi,

    Anyone have a better ending?

    thus keeping my brain from shrinking?

    SG,

    Thanks

    in reply to: Limericks! #1221425
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Mazel Tov on the wedding,

    remember to bring with you bedding.

    Give someone the map,

    while you take a nap,

    when to Baltimore you are heading.

    in reply to: Limericks! #1221421
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Yossi, it was a nice try,

    but your poems just did not fly.

    Not bad the timing,

    but awful the rhyming,

    So I will let you know the rules,

    (I went to four limerick schools).

    These rules you must follow,

    so here are some important tools.

    it must fit into certain specs,

    Lines 1,2, with 5

    and 3 with 4 jive,

    and there is not much room to flex.

    The first and the second line,

    may not have more sounds than 9.

    Lines 3 and 4

    cannot have more

    than five, for the limerick to shine.

    With one more rule I will proceed,

    the final line may not exceed,

    syllables seven,

    for limerick heaven,

    and now you know how to succeed!

    Your effort, I really commend;

    my words, I hope, do not offend.

    in reply to: Screen Names #1176152
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Because I only have one screen name. 🙂

    in reply to: My New Subtitle #993038
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Ken Zayn,

    Naaah…

    in reply to: Why my presence here is sporadic #732301
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    as you can tell from my posts although im a bubby i post in text lingo. i think it would really help if there was a spell check option. i dont know how or if we would be able to do that but when i use microsoft word i get the green and red lines under sentences when they are grammatically incorrreect. Mods please see if this is possible

    You could use a browser which has spell check, such as Firefox (I hear Google Chrome does also) or you could type your post in Word and copy it into the reply box.

    in reply to: 2nd Foster Child is a Choson #733121
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Tizku L’mitzvos, and Mazel Tov!

    in reply to: Fairly Clean Comedies #731956
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    The title of this thread, as well as some of the content, begs the question: Would any of us eat in a restaurant that is “fairly kosher”? As in, most courses are “glatt”, except for one side dish which has pig in it?

    in reply to: Fairly Clean Comedies #731955
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    *kapusta*,

    If you change your mind and decide not to post something while the EDIT option is still there, you can resubmit it blank.

    Or, just post asking us to take it down.

    in reply to: Twisting Usernames #731894
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Avram,

    The one that you commented on in another thread was over the line. I pointed that out over there as well.

    in reply to: Why my presence here is sporadic #732291
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Thank you. (That’s English for thank you.)

    I had an Aunt Tilde.

    in reply to: Why my presence here is sporadic #732287
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    BTW, how did you get the < em > not to italicize?

    in reply to: Why my presence here is sporadic #732286
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Mr. 80:

    like this ronsr < em >text</ em >

    People can write, text, or blog… however they want.

    in reply to: Why my presence here is sporadic #732284
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    ronsr:

    Jokes

    Spell Checkers – a little Poem.

    A Little Poem Regarding Computer Spell Checkers…

    Eye halve a spelling chequer

    It came with my pea sea

    It plainly marques four my revue

    Miss steaks eye kin knot sea.

    Eye strike a key and type a word

    And weight four it two say

    Weather eye am wrong oar write

    It shows me strait a weigh.

    As soon as a mist ache is maid

    It nose bee fore two long

    And eye can put the error rite

    Its rare lea ever wrong.

    Eye have run this poem threw it

    I am shore your pleased two no

    Its letter perfect awl the weigh

    My chequer tolled me sew.

    in reply to: Twisting Usernames #731891
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Now that was mean-spirited. Moderator, can you please delete that? Oh… you’re the moderator. 🙂

    in reply to: Twisting Usernames #731889
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    So you’re saying that they should doctor the post?

    All kidding aside, I agree, but in context; sometimes it’s clearly meant in a lighthearted way. For example, others have agreed to something I’ve posted, and pointed out that I’m not a “Daas Yochid”.

    in reply to: Why my presence here is sporadic #732280
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Halfagirl:

    People can write, text, or blog… however they want.

    It might not be the end of the world to misspell something, but to call Haifagirl “Halfagirl”? That’s a bit much.

    in reply to: My New Subtitle #993028
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant
    in reply to: My New Subtitle #993026
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Nor does it have a ??????.

    in reply to: Why my presence here is sporadic #732276
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    That reminds me of the story with the Rov and the apikores* (an old friend from childhood). The apikores challenged the use of “trop”** in laining***. The Rov asked the apikores to borrow 100 ruble. The apikores obliged. The following week, when the apikores asked for his money, the Rov responded, “I owe you a hundred rubles?”. The apikores reminded the Rov of the previous week’s encounter, to which the Rov responded, again, “I owe you a hundred rubles?”. Now the apikores got really angry, until the Rov explained that he said “I owe you a hundred rubles.”, just with different trop!

    *heretic

    **cantillation

    ***Torah reading

    in reply to: Why my presence here is sporadic #732274
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    “see how important an apostrophe can be!”

    Commas as well; consider the difference between the folowing:

    1) We hate to see you go.

    2) We hate to see you, go.

    in reply to: My New Subtitle #993024
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Godol

    it’s spelled Gadol 🙂

    Are you Sefardi? 🙂

    in reply to: Show off your talents! #1005458
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    so (one) [no] one feels like their being singled out for punishment.

    Now that takes talent!

    in reply to: New Posters = Old Posters??? #755720
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Yankel Maza said he doesnt know you and nor does any of his chevra.

    That’s because they owe me money.

    in reply to: My New Subtitle #993021
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Godol of Queens

    in reply to: Poetry Thread #833858
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    It is, indeed, essential,

    that we should all be together,

    regardless of what kind of kippah,

    knitted, velvet, or leather.

    With one point I must take exception,

    this point is “l’chol hadeyos”.

    Although they may not need to curl,

    a man may not cut off his peyos.

    (I know you didn’t mean it that way.)

    in reply to: Why my presence here is sporadic #732273
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Why does this bother you so much

    You left out the question mark (?).

    in reply to: texting while driving #732178
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Popa, you shouldn’t text while drive, not only because of the statue

    i dont understand. is there a certain statue near where popa lives that is particularly prone to being run into by a distracted driver?

    80,

    Wrong thread.

    in reply to: New Posters = Old Posters??? #755718
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Yes you went with Jackie Mason didnt you.

    You obviously do know me if you know that I’m buddies with Yankel Maza.

    in reply to: texting while driving #732175
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Who wasn’t sleeping?

    The cop.

    And he probably woke you up also.

    in reply to: Why my presence here is sporadic #732269
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Mr. 80,

    Agreed.

    I’m glad you clarified witch (sick)(sic) you were talking about.

    in reply to: Why my presence here is sporadic #732267
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    1) One uses a “spelling” checker to check one’s spelling. One uses a “spell” checker to check one’s spells. Any witches in the CR?

    http://www.spellchecker.net

    Apparently, this website can’t spell its own name.

    2) If we’re going to be so pedantic, let us avoid the word “typo” as well.

    in reply to: My New Subtitle #993011
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Health,

    Good old question.

    in reply to: texting while driving #732169
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    on a residential street at 4:50AM

    Don’t you value your sleep?

    in reply to: New Posters = Old Posters??? #755716
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Once, to visit my hubcaps.

    in reply to: texting while driving #732167
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Popa Bar Abba,

    Thanks for your post. Until you chimed in, it seemed that this would be one of the few times everyone agreed. Then you got everyone except real-brisker to believe that you condone texting while driving, and made this a little more controversial. Good job.

    in reply to: Why my presence here is sporadic #732262
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    awn behaff uv awel thi peepel inn thi cofee rume eye aplijeyes four awel thi terabul speling

    in reply to: I'm down to the green rind…finally! #731656
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Hello,I stopped FOR 3 WHOLE DAYS!!

    I did the same thing with smoking. 🙂

    in reply to: The Joseph Thread #734554
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Yunger Mann,

    Read this post in which Joseph admits that he uses names that are not identified by the moderators as his. He posts under multiple names (undetected by the moderators) in the same thread, which changes the tone of the whole discussion. I agree that nobody should take anything in an anonymous blog as anything other than food for thought, but the sad reality is that too many people are taking things too literally here. This behavior lacks integrity.

    http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/mods-mods/page/9#post-196694

    in reply to: socializing #731990
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Bpt I don’t think its right to be the type that talks to your nerighbor!!! Why do you think its fine to talk to an opposite gender neighbor?? Just cuz she’s your neighbor its mutar?? Please explain

    Mother in israel if your not the type to talk to your neigghbor kal vchomer you shouldn’t talk to people on the internet. I think you should rethink

    Very cute, you’ve just said that no one should be in the coffee room.

    in reply to: I'm down to the green rind…finally! #731653
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I have finally run out of thread ideas.

    Oh, really?

    in reply to: New Posters = Old Posters??? #755711
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    For the record, I’ve never met you and have no idea who you are.

    That you know of.

    in reply to: Is It My Imagination?Or… #735136
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Yes, it’s your imagination. Now get a life. 🙂

    in reply to: rich zivug #731578
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Why daven for it? Just don’t go out with anyone who’s not rich!

    (Save your tefillos for sholom bayis – you’ll need it.)

    in reply to: texting while driving #732159
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Bumper sticker:

    IF YOU DON’T LIKE THE WAY I DRIVE GET OFF THE SIDEWALK

    in reply to: Poetry Thread #833855
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    That’s something I didn’t know,

    that Howie is chassidish,

    I knew that he was Jewish;

    but I thought that he was Swedish.

    Reminds me of the Journeys song: (Abie Rotenberg)

    But now they call him Chaim’l

    and on Shabbos wears a shtreim’l

    ’cause their buried faith ignited

    while flying on United

    to the atheists’ convention in LA.

    in reply to: texting while driving #732155
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I’m not vouching for the accuracy, but I found this:

    http://www.articlebliss.com/Art/392666/80/Why-Texting-While-Driving-Is-Worse-Than-DWI.html

    Why Texting While Driving Is Worse Than DWI

    By : Jay Jacobson

    Car and Driver performed research that considered a drivers distance and response time to come to a stop travelling at 70MPH. The study revealed that it took the drunk driver four feet further to come to a stop compared to the sober driver. The shocking part of the study came when they examined texting while driving. It took the one that was texting while driving 70 feet to stop in comparison to the sober driver.

    Texting while driving removes 3 important things required for safe driving:

    1) You Hands

    2) Your Eyes and,

    3) Your Concentration

    A driver who’s texting makes use of his hands, eyes, and concentration to text. This places them as well as everyone else around them at risk and what makes texting while driving more dangerous than an intoxicated driver.

    Let’s undertake this line of thought a step further. There’s 800,000 people at any given moment who are distracted by means of texting and driving. Dangerous driving conditions in our day are at a whole new level. With 800,000 texting you can be fairly certain that there may be someone close to you who is distracted by texting.

    The statistics demonstrate that driver associated accidents and fatilities are up due to the lethal grouping of texting and driving. Join us in making an individual pledge in saying “NO” to texting while driving.

    in reply to: texting while driving #732154
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    The oilum is not chaping the amkus of popas post.

    Which oilum?

    Texting is almost as bad as DWI.

    Maybe it’s worse? Do we have any stats?

Viewing 50 posts - 20,101 through 20,150 (of 20,477 total)