Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
☕ DaasYochid ☕Participant
the zman is from Rosh Chodesh Iyar until the Yom Tovim
Then I really can’t understand why he was only accepted for next zman, unless they feel that his original yeshiva is an option.
Either way, it is indeed very sad.
☕ DaasYochid ☕Participanta “Like” button doesn’t just tally up how many people agree, but it also shows the names (usernames) of who agrees. And you could only hit it once.
If so, I agree that there is some value to it.
☕ DaasYochid ☕Participantwb,
It’s good you translated; you forgot the ??? in the original post.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantLike when I ruin your jokes, or like my (sincere) compliment?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantMod 80,
You’re an exception. Your proven track record of intelligent and thoughtful observations makes your opinion important to me, as well as to many others, I’m sure. (Sorry if I ruined your joke.) ?
☕ DaasYochid ☕Participant*don’t like*
Here’s why:
Many of us here in the CR are familiar with each other’s worldviews, so who agrees is more important than how many agree (I’m assuming that a *like* button merely tallies).
I generally won’t post a simple “I agree” or “I disagree” unless I have something to add to the discussion. On most every issue discussed here, a poll is not very important to me; if I hold a certain opinion, telling me that 77% of the people in the CR who chose to vote disagree with me will not change my mind. A thoughtful comment might.
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
As an aside, is their any veracity to a *like* button, or can one person hit it multiple times and skew the numbers?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI think getzel was suggesting that there’s a spiritual connection.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantYou’re better off not talking to people about who you’re going out with.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI’d like to face pba in a game of Battleship so that I can sink his boat.
☕ DaasYochid ☕Participants2021,
I hope you took my joke in good humor.
My favorites were always chess and Stratego (does that date me?).
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantSpell-O-Rama ?
May 19, 2011 4:14 am at 4:14 am in reply to: Firestorm After �Der Zeitung� Deletes Hillary Clinton from Iconic Photo #1052792☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantMy standards of modesty preclude my having this type of discussion in a public forum.
May 18, 2011 11:30 pm at 11:30 pm in reply to: Firestorm After �Der Zeitung� Deletes Hillary Clinton from Iconic Photo #1052789☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantDaas: You don’t find it immodest for a Jewish man to view a photo of a woman wearing pants?
I never said a word here about what my standards are, I don’t know where you got that from.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantIt has to be at the expense of something else… unless you’re positing two candidates that are otherwise completely equal.
I wouldn’t consider yichus more important than factors such as middos/yiras shamayim (to the contrary; those are certainly more important), but those are often unknown (beyond what’s readily observable), so for practical purposes, the two candidates might be considered completely equal.
If you were deciding between two schools for your child, you would decide based on which school seemed to have a better chance of enabling success for that child. You would consider who the teachers and administrative staff are, as well as the type of students they attract, and of course, the track record each school has with children similar to yours.
However, you would not be certain which school would actually be better; unknown factors, such as how well your child will interact with his/her teachers, principal, and classmates could play into it, but you have no choice other than to decide based on the known.
Even if you don’t consider yichus to be of great importance, at least grant it as a factor. In my above example, you might decide that the schools have equal merit, and the determining factor might end up being something as relatively unimportant as closer proximity or slightly lower tuition.
May 18, 2011 11:05 pm at 11:05 pm in reply to: Firestorm After �Der Zeitung� Deletes Hillary Clinton from Iconic Photo #1052786☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantInsulting her was a BIG gaffe.
Was she actually insulted, or is that conjecture?
May 18, 2011 11:03 pm at 11:03 pm in reply to: Firestorm After �Der Zeitung� Deletes Hillary Clinton from Iconic Photo #1052785☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantOomis,
Aside from the lack of modesty (their standards, not mine) of a woman appearing in a photo, there’s a lack of modesty in a man seeing a photo of a woman (again, their standards, not mine).
Since I don’t personally see any photo of a woman being intrinsically immodest, I actually suspect that an editorial policy of not printing pictures of a woman is not due to the inherent immodesty, rather as a precaution that a mistake not be made and a picture be published should not have been.
If I ran a chareidi paper, I would not publish pictures of women, but not because of the inherent immodesty. I would be afraid that a sponsor would want to advertise with a picture of a woman, for example if a couple was being honored, and the picture would not fit my standards. If I refused to publish it, those donors could easily get insulted. If the policy is to not allow any pictures, then there would be no insult.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantConsidering it’s already late-May, I think you have to write this z’man off as lost.
You might be right, but it’s a big problem; a teenager having no schedule for months straight is a dangerous thing – batala m’viah lidei shiamum and zimah.
What I don’t understand is that if this is a normal bochur, just not a m’tzuyan, why can’t he stay where he was before Pesach?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantWouldn’t someone want his children to have the z’chus avos of the tzaddikim who were ancestors of his spouse?
☕ DaasYochid ☕Participantadorable, can you move a little to the right.
There are many other posters here who are much more in need of a move to the right.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantHas anyone mentioned z’chus avos?
☕ DaasYochid ☕Participantif i ever get interviewed for a background check on you, ill just say: “read this post and decide for yourself.”
If you would ever be interviewed for a background check on me, I’d be in trouble anyway.
☕ DaasYochid ☕Participantgood try but your defense is flawed.
That’s what happens when I work pro bono.
My defense would have worked if he had said something like “I ate a tuna fish”.
Most people I know don’t eat sweaters, even if they smell like fish.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantMod 80,
To defend Derech HaMelech:
When “fish” is appended to “salmon”, it’s redundant, because what else could it refer to other than fish! When “fish” is appended to “tuna”, it’s not redundant, because if you don’t specify “fish”, it might refer to a bagel.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantHow much should parents tell their children who are in shidduchim?
When and where the wedding is.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantWhats going in your suitcase?
Pba’s first wife.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantRamateshkolian , I think I may agree with you and does anyone else have any information similar to what was said by Rav Berkowitz???
Let’s assume that R’ Berkowitz said that milk represents the Torah, so the rule which applies to other Yomim Tovim doesn’t apply to Shavuos. Now, if anyone goes according to the simple understanding, that Shavuos is the same as other Yomim Tovim, it’s “totally based on nothing”?
Anyone who doesn’t follow this little known opinion which deviates from simple understanding (although I’m not c”v belittling it or R’ Berkowitz) must definitely be motivated by sinister motives (trying to do the “frummer” thing, meaning ga’avah)?
Sorry, I most definitely disagree.
May 17, 2011 11:23 pm at 11:23 pm in reply to: The Litmus Test of a good Principal- and preventing students from going OTD #767617☕ DaasYochid ☕Participantmy proofreading skills must be horrible.
They’re better than most (and that error wouldn’t be caught by spell-check).
Don’t sweat it, your post are extremely readable.
You’re allowed to make a mistake one in a while! ?
May 17, 2011 7:02 pm at 7:02 pm in reply to: The Litmus Test of a good Principal- and preventing students from going OTD #767614☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantIf, indeed, the kid willingly and knowingly broke a school rule as important as this, I think we can agree that some punishment is in order. Was there no punishment between “nothing” and “explusion” that could have been applied?
The Wolf
Excellent point, and the answer probably lies in the numerous factors which were not specified in the OP.
Also keep in mind, that with three weeks left to go in the school year (and in this case, until graduation), the students feel like they can get away with anything, so the response might be different than it would be if it had occurred in the middle of 11th grade.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantDY
Does it erase memories?
No, but that’s not a contradiction.
?????? ??? ??
? ???????????, ???????? ???????.
? ???????-?????? ????? ?????????, ?????????-???? ???-????-??????.
? ???????? ???????? ????????????; ?????? ?????????, ????? ????????.
? ???? (?????), ??????????? ??????????; ????????????? ?????????.
? ????-????????, ????? ?????; ??????????? ???????? ??????.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantYou wont get it back, whats done is done.
I disagree. The highest level of teshuva completely cleanses, and any amount of teshuva cleanses to some degree; the more the teshuva, the more clean.
Time also heals to some extent, if there are no relapses.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI’ve also noticed lower prices.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantOK, let’s play a little. What “severe negative influence” is there to the rest of the class for three weeks, for talking to a neighbor outside school?
I don’t agree with J/P.M. That there’s a direct negative influence, unless the boy talks to his classmates about it (which is possible, since he was in a public place and had no “busha”).
However, if such a public violation of a yeshiva’s standards is allowed to go unpunished, the standard becomes unenforceable.
And, let’s face it, it’s a black eye for the yeshiva (which is why the menahel should not make such a decision unilaterally, since he has “negiyus”).
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantBoth the Rosh and the student should present their case and the boy should then leave.
Completely unrealistic. No menahel would or should be involved in a public debate with a student.
What you are suggesting would also be terribly humiliating for the student, as you point out later in your post, so you haven’t helped matters, you’ve just replaced one humiliation with another.
Your entire opinion is predicated on your considering what this (fictitious, IMO) student did as “no big deal”. Most yeshivas do consider such socializing to be a big deal, and the students know it (which is why just explaining to him what’s wrong is not sufficient).
I’m not suggesting that a boy be thrown out for this; it’s much more complicated than that, and yes, it’s devastating for him., but a fair discussion has to consider the seriousness of the issue. The fact that the socializing took place in plain sight also indicates that the boy is not even embarrassed, which takes things to a different level.
I’m not sure why, Aries, you are fixated om the “moser”. If the menahel confirmed things independently, he must deal with the issue even if he became aware of it through an individual who may have had the wrong motivation.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantJust to nitpick (and clarify), I can’t imagine you think that not paying tuition is going against the “Ribono Shel Olam’s rules”.
My post was unclear. I didn’t mean parents who break the rules of paying tuition; I didn’t even mean breaking any rules. I meant to refer to the parents’ motivation for paying tuition, sending to yeshiva, and following the Torah in general.
☕ DaasYochid ☕Participantoh yeah, and clairvoyant.
Don’t worry, Pac-Man and canine have the same style.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantSo, as good parents do, we pay our tuition cuz we have to, we send our kids to yeshiva cuz we have to, and we follow all the rules of society cuz we have to.
The parents who have this attitude are causing problems for their kids.
Parents are much more likely to have nachas from their children if they pay tuition and send their kids to yeshiva because they understand the the importance of a proper Torah chinuch. They are less likely to find their kids breaking the Torah’s rules if they keep those rules themselves, not because we have to follow society’s rules, but because they are the Ribono Shel Olam’s rules (given to us for our benefit), and out sense of gratitude to Him for all He does for us, we wish to and must.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI haven’t seen real-brisker in a while either.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantA parent can never spend too-much time with the kids.
I think I’ll quit my job and pull my kids out of school so that I can spend every possible moment with them.
☕ DaasYochid ☕Participantdiscuss it with their Rebbe
It certainly couldn’t hurt. HaleiVi earlier suggested to speak it over with the principal. That would also be a good idea.
To quote BSD, though, “I can’t imagine that the school would allow them to take off. “
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantMy family members who attend Charedi yeshivas took the RCTS and laughed about what a bittul torah it was
Don’t blame the rest of us for their attitude.
_____________________________________________________________________
I got a 93 on Math III (the old system), after spending the whole year standing at the back window and looking outside during class (I was in a fight with the teacher). There wasn’t even anything interesting outside.
Not even a boat?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantAre Egozi bars still available?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantIf you think they need a day off, give it to them. No one should question a parent’s call in a case like this
If they “need a day off”, give it to them now, why wait until next week?
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantC. She’s being facetious.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantThe lesson is FAMILY time is important. It is NOT wrong to teach kids how important it is to spend time together.
Then why the Great Parade during yeshiva hours? Let them go to a park after yeshiva is over and spend time with each other, instead of taking off learning time to spend “quality time” with Uncle Moishy and MBD.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantWhich “wrong” message exactly will this give them?
That fun and games is more important than learning. For that matter, that fun and games is more important than responsibility. A student should be taught that attendance is mandatory and that (s)he should only take off for something urgent. The Great Parade is not urgent.
Of course, if this particular child has a specific need, that might be different. I’m generalizing, for a normal, well adjusted child.
May 16, 2011 5:01 am at 5:01 am in reply to: The Litmus Test of a good Principal- and preventing students from going OTD #767596☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantYou want every principal to be a gadol hador. So do I, but if we would demand it, we won’t have enough principals.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantWhat do I have to do with this?
“Health” issues.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantHow do you spell troll?
You should start a separate thread for spelling questions.?
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/menahels-decision-to-expel-a-good-boy#post-247031
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/menahels-decision-to-expel-a-good-boy#post-247052
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/this-weeks-atypical-troll-post#post-247021
☕ DaasYochid ☕Participantwb
unbelievable to call R Shraga Feivel ZT”L “Mr Mendlowitz.”
He called himself that out of modesty, and I’ve heard people call him that, always as a term of respect and endearment.
☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI’m not sure how to start a new thread.
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/how-to-add-a-new-thread
-
AuthorPosts