☕ DaasYochid ☕

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 17,901 through 17,950 (of 20,477 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Should the coffee room be split into two? #792283
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Someone cast doubts about my view, so i was compelled to demonstrate that it actually has very solid ground even among leading frum Rabbonim today.

    All you said was that a big Rosh Yeshva said to be normal, but we disagree as to what normal is!

    in reply to: Should the coffee room be split into two? #792276
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    chumros that don’t have any basis in halachah or yiddeshkeit

    Please name some which are widely practiced, since you claim that the superfrum/chassidish/twisted/abnormal/unhappy people practice them.

    in reply to: TEXTING ON SHABBOS #815474
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    If a computer is on 24/7, how are you boneh a circuit by clicking on a bookmark? Alternatively, how is it m’saken mana?

    A micro circuit is connected, to the best of my knowledge. I don’t know about m’saken mana in this case.

    in reply to: ALL ABOARD- PROJECT IMPROVE #1045522
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Why don’t you try davening in a different shul and see if that helps?

    It’s not the davening that’s the problem.

    in reply to: Should the coffee room be split into two? #792274
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    yes halevi, because there is only one coffee room for two distinct groups, such things are bound to happen

    So you’re saying that having only one coffee room legitimizes hypocrisy??

    in reply to: TEXTING ON SHABBOS #815470
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I don’t know if that makes it mutar, but it certainly makes it much less of a chilul shabbos.

    grama is still assur and chillul Shabbos. If we are dealing with an issur d’rabbonon (which according to many, we are), what difference does it make that you call it “less” of a chillul Shabbos?

    since a light or a fan is attached to the house, by completing the circuit you are doing boneh.

    I don’t think it has anything to do with being connected to a house. Most understand the Chazon Ish to mean that you were “boneh” the circuit.

    BTW, check the other thread for the source of the Ramba”m.

    in reply to: Is it worth it to get married and divorced? #792133
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I wouldn’t let someone do gellila who talks during leining.

    If given a choice between someone who talks during leining or posts in the CR on Shabbos, I’d give it to the talker.

    in reply to: TEXTING ON SHABBOS #815468
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    What about electricity renders it impermissible on Shabbos?

    The Chazon Ish holds it is boneh. Others, I believe, hold it is m’saken mana.

    I think that it is pashut that this is no better than chuk tochos.

    Do you have a source that “chuk tochos” is muttar on Shabbos?

    Would hitting “print”, activating your computer’s printer to produce a sheet of writing, be muttar according to you?

    in reply to: TEXTING ON SHABBOS #815465
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    quark,

    You haven’t addressed the issue of use of electricity. There is not one accepted posek who would go along with you.

    in reply to: Can you help me find this Rambam? #792025
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    See ???”? ????? ????? ??? ?’ ???? ?-?.

    in reply to: TEXTING ON SHABBOS #815461
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I see a couple of reasons why texting would not be considered kesiva. Some poskim (perhaps not most, but I have heard of it) do not consider disconnected dots to be a ksav (the context in which I heard this was opening a bottle cap with the date on it). Also, unlike all of the examples found in poskim of ksav she’eino miskayeim, there are no real letters, just an electronic simulation. Saying, however, that there is no meisah k’sivah is wrong; if we were to consider the ksav to be a ksav, pushing the buttons would be a meisah k’sivah.

    However, all contemporary poskim accept the view that any use of electricity is assur either mid’rabbonan or mid’oraisa, so using a phone to text would definitely be assur, and any statements to the contrary are pure rationalization.

    The reason people text, IMO, is because it is addictive behavior. Although, as aries pointed out, many smokers don’t smoke on Shabbos, unfortunately, some do.

    in reply to: Should the coffee room be split into two? #792262
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Because orthodox and frum are two different things. I see.

    Many Torah observant Jews do not prefer the term “orthodox”. As Rav Gifter ZT”L is quoted as saying, “I am not an orthodox Jew, I am a Torah Jew”. Most “modern orthodox” do not have a problem with it, so the terms are not interchangeable.

    in reply to: Shadchanus Gelt #1141703
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I’m not ready to concede is the case

    Mechila is a basic principle in Choshen Mishpat matters. Why would you not concede this?

    posters here have made the case that shadchanus money is important and that not giving it can adversely affect the marriage.

    I haven’t seen the case made for this, even when the shadchan is mochel. Maybe I missed it.

    in reply to: Shadchanus Gelt #1141697
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Wolf,

    I don’t think I am in disagreement with Chein. He is correct that what must be paid is dictated by halacha, not personal feeling. If the shadchan did not perform the service with intent to charge, then halacha dictates that there is no obligation.

    When you do a photography job pro bono, are you doing anything wrong by not charging? No! It’s the same with shadchanus.

    Besides, Chein was referring to what must be paid, and you’re talking about what must be charged.

    in reply to: Another view on reporting abuse #816308
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    It seems that the argument is over when one is not absolutely sure of the situation.

    Who says you need 100% certainty, rather than “raglayim l’davar”?

    in reply to: Shadchanus Gelt #1141695
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I did not compare a shadchan to a defense lawyer or plumber, I contrasted. A shadchan is indeed a type of broker.

    in reply to: Should the coffee room be split into two? #792251
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I really don’t understand how all of these people who seem so frum by the opinions that they express, have internet access, that according to them is assur gamur. This mystefies me.

    Some people need internet for parnassah, in which case, with proper filtering, most rabbonim will be matir.

    Since most “twisted”, “abnormal”, “unhappy” (IOW, very frum) people don’t have internet, their views are actually very underrepresented, even on a site called “Yeshiva World”.

    If you don’t like this site, no one is stopping you from starting your own.

    in reply to: Should the coffee room be split into two? #792244
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    one for the people leaning more towards the super – frum/chassidish side, and one for the normal people not leaning that way.

    Aha. You think super-frum/chassidish aren’t normal.

    As do many of the comments of the chassidish/super frum who are trying to impose their twisted world view onto everyone else.

    Aha. You think super-frum/chassidish are twisted.

    Give it up. You are NOT doing a mitzvah, and you are not doing G-ds will. G-d wants us to lead happy, normal lives. Be normal

    Aha. You think super-frum/chassidish are unhappy.

    Oy vey.

    in reply to: Another view on reporting abuse #816303
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    In what way is his approach different than that of A.I.?

    They both seem to follow the psak of Rav Elyashiv Shlit”a; if anything, Rav Aviner could be seen as being more on the side of restraint from reporting than R’ Elyashiv. R’ Elyashiv paskens to report with “raglayim l’davar”, which means a reasonable suspicion, and does not require 100% knowledge. R’ Aviner only talks about a case of certainty.

    in reply to: Shadchanus Gelt #1141693
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Another sin on my part.

    I respectfully disagree. If your intention was to do it as merely a favor, there is no financial obligation.

    in reply to: Shadchanus Gelt #1141692
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    kako,

    You’re not taking into account all of the work that goes into shadchanus, often hours upon hours. Also, since a shadchan does not pay for a shidduch which does not end in marriage (or engagement, depending on the community), the compensation for a successful one may be higher than for other services with a different system (e.g. a defense lawyer who gets paid even if his client is convicted) or success rate (e.g. a plumber who is able to properly fix the problem 99% of the time).

    in reply to: Shadchanus #791636
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    My cousin and his sister

    In other words, your cousin, and the chosson’s sister.

    There is almost definitely shadchanus owed. The proper person to ask how much, is a rov.

    Mazel tov!

    in reply to: Shadchanus Gelt #1141674
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    We didn’t give any shadchanus gelt to anyone when I became engaged.

    Hmm… I wonder why not? 😉

    On the occasions that I arranged shiduchim, I did not want to accept any shadchanus (but did accept a small gift when the couples insisted).

    If the shadchan intended to do it pro bono, there is no obligation.

    From this week’s Business Halacha newsletter: http://www.businesshalacha.com/sites/default/files/web-file-manager/files/email-files/Business-Weekly-5771-Masei.pdf

    By Rabbi Meir Orlian

    Halacha Writer for the Business Halacha Institute

    in reply to: who goes to whom? #789838
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    DY, what if the girl is in town?

    Then she doesn’t need to make a special trip.

    in reply to: Why burn Yummy Snacks? #789516
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Just justifies why I don’t follow that derech.

    How? It sounded reasonable and thought out. You’d have to have previous disagreement with this approach to find fault, but it’s consistent with NK’s worldview. I see no additional justification here to disagree.

    in reply to: who goes to whom? #789830
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    The OOT girls come in most of the time, because otherwise nobody would agree to go out with them.

    in reply to: Crocs on Tisha Ba’av #789799
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I will not have Crocs for 9 Av this year unless I’m stupid enough to risk athlete’s foot by wearing the pair I left at the mikve.

    Why don’t you spray them with an anti-fungal?

    in reply to: Can one give "Maaser" by volenteering time? #789386
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    R’ Dovid Feinstein said that he feels that Maaser is something that has to actually come out of my pocket. He therefore felt that I could not count the time as Maaser unless I charged them & then returned the money

    Is that because it literally has to come out of pocket, and if someone was moichel his salary to a mosad (as in dz’s example) it would not be ma’aser? Or is it because if he wasn’t offered a salary, then it’s not considered as if he’s given money?

    I would think the latter.

    What seems most logical to me is that one could only deduct work as ma’aser if he actually could have received compensation.

    in reply to: Child Abuse #790095
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    A child’s assertion of abuse, especially if the same thing has been reported by a few children, is not merely an allegation.

    Depending on the circumstances (do they know each other or have someone in common to coach them), multiple accusations might very well be raglayim l’davar.

    I’m not sure what your question to me is – whether or not something is raglayim l’davar is obviously a halachic shaila and must be asked to a posek. Otherwise, no matter what the percentage of false accusations is, there would certainly be many more if every child was always believed with no other evidence.

    You analogy to Leiby Kletzky a”h is beyond me.

    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Girls get lost and waste lots of time on “lists”.

    No, being on a list does not keep a girl waiting. She can see who she wants, regardless of how many boys have her on a list, as long as she hasn’t yet agreed to see someone else. In fact, since the boy usually has to wait for an answer from the girl, not the other way around, the boys waste more time than the girls.

    True statistic: with the rare exception of double-dipping, the exact same number of boys are busy, at a given time, as girls. Why then are boys busier than girls?

    The reason the boys are busier is because there are fewer of them.

    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    HayyimOvadya,

    Most 18-21 tear old boys are discouraged from going out because they’re not ready, so I don’t know if that theory can be tested. I know of cases where the husband is a year or two older, and I hear it’s becoming more frequent.

    Where there is reluctance, as I said, I think it’s more from the men’s side, both because they consider it more of an issue than the women do, and because they are in a better position to be more specific in whom they seek as a spouse.

    in reply to: Moshe Rose #789193
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I was not aware that defining a haiku constituted lashon hara. I shall refrain from doing so in the future.

    In this case, it was okay; it was l’toeles. 😉

    in reply to: Child Abuse #790079
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Literally, “the matter has legs” (to stand on), the idea is NOT that to report, one must know for sure, rather, there must be corroborating evidence, not merely allegations. The amount of evidence and credibility of the evidence is subjective, and must be determined by a competent posek. This should be done immediately, so that any reasonable suspicion will be acted upon before there are any more victims, c”v.

    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Peacemaker,

    Could be, but I imagine less so than the boys. Putting aside natural bias, though, I can’t imagine too many 23 year old girls turning down a 23 year old boy just because of age, simply because the chances are she has not been getting too many offers of good 26 year old boys (by that age, there are relatively few left).

    in reply to: Why do the 'BOYS' have the upper hand???? #788700
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Why do the ‘BOYS’ have the upper hand????

    Becasue when we get married, Girls get the upper hand.

    ?

    in reply to: Page 2 #1023514
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    pba,

    I have the same question – I’m guessing it has something to do with where on the page the post is.

    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    HayyimOvadya,

    #1 – I think it’s more from the men’s side.

    # – I think you’ve got it analyzed correctly.

    in reply to: Why burn Yummy Snacks? #789506
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    With so many going hungry, I have a hard time with this form of protest…seems like a terrible waste of food…

    That stuff’s not food.

    Just curious, Mike, how could you open a thread blasting another group after all we’ve gone through these couple of weeks? Shouldn’t we be looking for ways to come together?

    FTR, I hate NK, but I thought I’d point out that it’s easy to say let’s all come together – on my terms.

    in reply to: Mitzvah to Remarry Your Ex-Wife #794209
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    shlishi,

    The term is more often used with the word “misheniseis” and is a lav, not a mitzvah. It’s not found among the 613, but there is reference to it:

    ???? ???? ????? ?????? ??????, ???”? ??????

    ???? ??? ???? – ?? ??/?

    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    The difference is in the attitude towards dating, not the numbers

    That explains why the boys are busy but the girls are desperate to have a boy agree to go out with them?

    hello99, do you agree that annual population growth is based on TFR? If not, there’s nothing more to discuss. If you do agree, then you find me someone who says the TFR is low enough to balance the numbers. (Avichai doesn’t say that, especially since they report growth in the growth rate.)

    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    These statistics are quoted all over the place; they’re available from the Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics.

    in reply to: DIVORCE CRISIS – young couples getting divorced #1200083
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I asked my Rav about sneezing. He said it’s not a problem.

    Your rav must be a big meikil. Time to get a new rav.

    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I’m sorry if your so desensitized to kedusha that you can have treif cookbooks in your house. I can’t eat some where where there is such a lack of kedusha

    Mosherose, there are treif recipes all over the internet, so you’d better get rid of your computer, fast, before you get even more desensitized than you already are.

    in reply to: Changed Topic of Shiur – Do I Have A Right To Be Disappointed? #788321
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Wolf,

    Refuah sheleima to your mother.

    MR,

    Learn the halacha before posting your theories. Bikur cholim, when it’s ?? ???? ?”? ????? (certainly true in this case) will take priority over talmud Torah.

    The mishna is referring to the value, not to priority.

    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    hello99,

    From Wikipedia: (TFR = total fertility rate)

    TFR is very high among Haredi Jews. For Ashkenazi Haredim, the TFR rose to 8.51 in 1996 from 6.91 in 1980. The figure for 2008 is estimated to be even higher. TFR for Sephardi/Mizrachi Haredim rose from 4.57 in 1980 to 6.57 in 1996.

    Even if you’re correct that the TFR is higher in E.Y. than in the U.S., there could still be enough growth in the U.S. to easily have a 4% annual growth.

    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    apashutayid,

    Your confusion should end after your first sentence. You’re correct that the boys have longer lists than the girls, and are busy more often than the girls, for the simple reason that there are fewer of them.

    in reply to: thread starter responsibilities #787950
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    I didn’t see them, but it’s still common decency.

    in reply to: Why do the 'BOYS' have the upper hand???? #788686
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Traditionally, the boy is approached first because the feeling exists that girls, being more sensitive, will take rejection harder.

    That having been said, the reason the girls seem to wait longer for a date is simple demographics, which have been discussed on this site ad nauseum. There are simply more girls in shidduchim than boys.

    in reply to: DIVORCE CRISIS – young couples getting divorced #1200077
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Working on it,

    For your theory to be correct, you would have to demonstrate that people who live in a culture with pressure to marry young have a higher divorce rate than those who don’t. I don’t think that’s the case.

    in reply to: Changed Topic of Shiur – Do I Have A Right To Be Disappointed? #788310
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Minyan Gal,

    Re: taking home food from a simcha.

    We’ve had this discussion before. To summarize, many (myself included) feel that it’s become completely acceptable, within certain reasonable parameters. There is actually a thought that’s it’s a legitimate way to share in the simcha.

Viewing 50 posts - 17,901 through 17,950 (of 20,477 total)