Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
CuriosityParticipant
Anon, I would argue exactly the opposite. A street fight is never fair, and you can assume that a self defense situation involves fending off a bigger and stronger opponent. Often times women are targets of attacking males. That’s why learning how to subdue and disable the threat quickly and directly, regardless of being at a physical disadvantage, is of key importance. More traditional styles such as Kung Fu and Wing Chun fail to provide the disciples with the easiest tools available to defend oneself, and instead respect the far-Eastern mantra of honorable, fair fighting. In Krav Maga we learn that if you find yourself in a fair fight, you’ve already made a big mistake.
CuriosityParticipantanon. I’m not going to start a debate over martial arts because inevitably people will be locked into their own pre-existing opinion, but why do you think Wing Chun would be better suited for self defense than krav maga? Let me remind you that many military and law enforcement agencies around the world have chosen variants of the Israeli krav maga as the most effective and efficient style for its enlisted. This means that anyone who argues that a different style is more effective in an unrestricted hand-to-hand encounter is arguing against the professional opinion of battle hardened combat specialists and defense consultants.
CuriosityParticipantPopa, I, for one, got a kick out of your leitzonus. Keep up the wonderful work. It’s nice when you bring up a touchy hashkafic subject such as this. When you come out and step on toes we get to see who winces.
CuriosityParticipantThe truth is… Almost everyone here including you, Shopping613…. we are all just different sides of my severe alternate personality disorder. 😀 Your subconscious even admitted it to your Shopping613 persona…. read your first several words…. “out of curiosity”…. we are all out of Curiosity….
O.O
CuriosityParticipantI’ve been doing it for about two years, and I can tell you Krav Maga definitely involves no board breaking, at all. It was probably just advertising shtick.
CuriosityParticipantMaybe if all girls weren’t so crazy, more of them would be married. Nine out of ten single men agree: Girls be cray.
CuriosityParticipantThanks.
July 14, 2013 5:34 pm at 5:34 pm in reply to: Do boys really have the upper hand in shidduchim? #966387CuriosityParticipantJF02 – I and many of my male friends have shidduch resumes. Also, I personally have been suggested to girls many times before they were suggested to me, and B’H, I’m not even the slightest bit an outstanding situation. As for your third example, that has absolutely nothing to do with dating.
DY – Girls can insist on that too if they wanted.
CuriosityParticipantI think from now on I’m just going to stick my foot out and trip the pacer… and be laning kriyas shma really loud while doing it.
CuriosityParticipantTakahmamash. Yes, I misunderstood you, but more importantly, how did you do that quotation block thing?
CuriosityParticipantJF02, the particular guy I mentioned is a guest in town and I don’t want to make him feel unwelcome. If this was a regular guy that I had to deal with day in and day out, I would surely say something.
Takahmamash, there is no other minyan in the area at this particular hour, and if there was, you shouldn’t abandon the place you are used davening in because one guy is being annoying.
CuriosityParticipantpixelate, I wasn’t even talking about psukei dzimrah so much. I particularly had in mind the people who decide to lane all of kriyas Shma at the top of their lungs. It’s so distracting.
Also, why do you feel that bringing attention to the fact (complaining?) that a particular mindless and inconsiderate action is disruptive to many people “detracts from the tzibbur’s tfillah”?
ratinalfrummie – maybe it doesn’t bother you when you pace, but I guarantee it distracts some of those sitting around you. They just might be too nice or adel to say anything about it. It’s very inconsiderate to tell people to concentrate on their own davening when you are constantly walking in and out of their field of vision and daled amos. It’s not derech eretz.
CuriosityParticipantJF02 – Human nature. Men are horrible multitaskers and can’t walk and think at the same time. 😉
CuriosityParticipantOom & pixelate. I would definitely ask them to stop, but it’s very hard to ask someone to stop in a nice way (without offending them) when you can’t use your words. You can’t talk for most of davening, or even signal with your hands if you are in the middle of 18, like I was. Also, I wasn’t in a place where people usually walk in front of, I was at a table in the back of a large beis medrash with a relatively small minyan, so there was plenty of space – the guy just happened to choose to pace right in front of the table I was at. Also, pixelate, there is a difference between out loud and OUT LOUD! And no, the plural nusach of davening and your personal decibal level really have nothing to do with each other.
Yes, there is something inherently wrong with it. You wouldn’t pace right if the president was in the room, so why pace if Hashem, lehavdil, is there? It’s also a mefurash halacha not to walk in front of someone who is davening, though some people say it’s halachicaly not totally assur if you have a table in front of you, but it’s no less distracting. Derech eretz is also a halacha.
CuriosityParticipantThis just never happens with bacon sandwiches, but remember, it’s a special kaparah that we Jews get the privilege of having.
CuriosityParticipantDepends how busy that store is.
July 10, 2013 12:05 pm at 12:05 pm in reply to: Is it proper for an adult to drink from a water fountain? #964827CuriosityParticipantOh no. You’re right! How could I ever think to argue with somebody who is an expert in fluid dynamics and equine anatomy?! All this time in yeshiva, and I still can’t read a single mefaresh properly! It’s not even like I memorized Nach, so I’m basically just a waste of flesh and bone. I’ll go jump off the nearest bridge now because there’s no point for me to live any more. If I had cookies, jmh, I would for sure give you all of them!! 😀
July 10, 2013 4:09 am at 4:09 am in reply to: Is it proper for an adult to drink from a water fountain? #964825CuriosityParticipantSam2, I guess it would depend who you view the purpose of acting refined is for. Some people may not give a second look if a chashuv ben Torah is or not wearing his hat outside, especially in “out of town” type places, but that doesn’t make it okay for a chashuv ben Torah to do. I think it’s an issue of how much appreciation the ben Torah has for his own dignity, rather than caring about how other people view his dignity. Meaning, let’s say theoretically you granted that it was beneath his dignity to drink directly from a fountain; I presume you would not say that if he went to visit a third world country where it was an acceptable norm that he should therefore be lax on his own personal standards. I, for one, cannot picture the Queen of England or even the Pope drinking from a water fountain.
July 9, 2013 11:06 pm at 11:06 pm in reply to: Is it proper for an adult to drink from a water fountain? #964819CuriosityParticipantJmh,
1) The slight to one’s kavod that I alluded to would be with drinking while bent, not bending down on its own. As I said in my very first statement, “it’s undignified to bend over and drink like a horse from a trough.”
2) I know you aren’t expecting to shlug up the Mahari Kra (I believe he is the father of the Rada”k) with your personal kashas, almost all of which I can personally already think of terutzim for.
3) Nowhere in the other mefarshim did I find it mention that the ones “lapping” where bent, hunched, or laying down. On the contrary, it sounded like they say farkert.
4) It matters not if even one mefaresh says like me, and a hundred are to the contrary. You can no longer use that posuk as a raya against what I (think I) heard my rebbi say. That’s besides the comment I made to Sam2 of why it’s not a raya either way.
July 9, 2013 7:21 pm at 7:21 pm in reply to: Is it proper for an adult to drink from a water fountain? #964817CuriosityParticipantubiq, I read posuk 5. I don’t see the words “laying down” anywhere, however, according to the Maharo Kra, there are three types : Those who did kriya to drink -posul, those who were melakek like a dog – also posul, and those who were melakek beyadam el pihem (posuk 6) – only these were the kosher ones. Perhaps the Mahari Kra’s second category referred to laying down, but he describes them as posul. Please read posuk 6 that says “lapping with their hands to their mouths,” and read the Mahari Kra on paukim 5 and 6 – It’s explicitly not like you. Also, please read Rashi on the words Melakekim Beyadam, “Ein ze derech kriah, kelokek bilshono.” Ie: not like a dog.
July 9, 2013 7:08 pm at 7:08 pm in reply to: Is it proper for an adult to drink from a water fountain? #964816CuriosityParticipantSam2, you’re correct to take a different approach because the pasuk is stam not a rayah either way. A yeshiva guy shouldn’t apply derech eretz from what was appropriate 2000 years ago for soldiers in the wilderness, during a war or in a survival situation. Similarly, I never saw a yeshiva guy take home an aishes yefas toar from the grocery store… heheh.
So, I’m not even 110% sure that I heard it, (it’s possible that it was only raised as a question but that there wasn’t an affirmative answer) but on the 99% chance that I did hear it, it was NOT that it’s assur, it’s that it is beneath the dignity of a recognized ben Torah to bend over a fountain to drink, and that it’s more appropriate to use a cup and drink like a mentsch. Also, this wasn’t said in context to yeshiva high school guys or young beis medrash bochurim, but intended to refine the sensitivities of the altar bochurim who would soon be getting smichah.
In a similar vein, I have always heard (this time 110% sure I did) that it is inappropriate for a ben Torah to drink beer from the bottle/can, but rather he should pour it into a cup. I don’t recall seeing this in tshuvas anywhere either. Just like drinking from a fountain, it’s just not one of those things that’s a “halacha” – assur or mutar- but rather a refinement of behavior that applies to those who should be sensitive enough.
July 9, 2013 2:09 pm at 2:09 pm in reply to: Is it proper for an adult to drink from a water fountain? #964810CuriosityParticipantubiq – I fail to see where it says “laying down.”
jmh – I’ll quote my earlier statements for you:
1) “it wasn’t pride, it was sarcastic humor.”
2) “the Mahari Kra even explicitly writes “standing up.””
3) “…Karrite communities of Apikorusim” did not say ‘ubiq communities of Apikorusim.’
And yes, through theoretical investigations of Newtonian mechanics and countless scientific experiments, I have discovered that one can bend down to scoop up water, then stand up to drink it while erect. Amazing, I know…
July 9, 2013 4:55 am at 4:55 am in reply to: Is it proper for an adult to drink from a water fountain? #964806CuriosityParticipantBy the way, even if you don’t want to look at the meforshim, the very next passuk says, “lapping with their hands to their mouths.” Klall u’prat, baby, klall u’prat…
And yes, I know why you brought it up. I’m arguing with you because, if I remember correctly, my Rebbi did say it’s not lechatchila for a ben Torah to bend over and drink from a fountain. I don’t know why you say nobody says like that when I just quoted you a bunch of meforshim who do.
July 9, 2013 4:23 am at 4:23 am in reply to: Is it proper for an adult to drink from a water fountain? #964805CuriosityParticipantubiq- If there is one thing I am sure about, it is that the universal mesorah for limud haTorah, in all but perhaps the Karrite communities of Apikorusim, is not to create our own interpretations of psukim. Meforshim are much smarter than you and I, and they tell us how to understand the pasuk correctly. That being said, you are arguing with almost all the meforshim on the page. If you have another chazal that interprets the pasuk differently, please share it. Otherwise, you can’t baselessly argue with chazal to support your own opinion… well… I guess you can, but you’d be wrong.
July 8, 2013 9:52 pm at 9:52 pm in reply to: Is it proper for an adult to drink from a water fountain? #964802CuriosityParticipantIt wasn’t pride, it was sarcastic humor. The meforshim in my Nach (which I named) clearly state the soldiers who were accepted were standing up to drink – I don’t know which meforshim you have in your Nach. The problem would be with bending over to drink, and nobody is saying drinking from a public fountain by bringing the water up to your mouth is a problem. You aren’t making sense, and you sound bitter.
July 8, 2013 5:54 pm at 5:54 pm in reply to: Is it proper for an adult to drink from a water fountain? #964796CuriosityParticipantubiq and Just my hap… lack of bekius in Nach, an am haaretz does not make. I trust my rebbi enough to not make stuff up without a source, or unless he heard it from his rebbi (who was one of the gedolei hador until his recent passing). When I learn Torah I spend most of that time focusing on Shas, mussar, and halacha. Nach is great, but it’s not going to tell you how to keep mitzvos properly, and it’s more important to memorize halacha than to memorize what’s in perek 7 in Shoftim.
I decided to look it up and you are actually 100% wrong. Hashem tells Gideon to choose the ones who lap the water from their hands (the Mahari Kra even explicitly writes “standing up”) and to dismiss the ones that bend over to drink directly from the stream. The Metzudas Dovid, Ralbag, Rabbeinu Yeshaya, Baal Haturim and more, explain that this is because those that got down on their knees to drink showed an indication that they were used to bowing to the Ba’al. Sounds to me like you just proved my rebbi’s point. So before you slander my rebbi or my yeshiva maybe you should reconsider who taught you how to learn. I rest my case.
July 8, 2013 5:25 am at 5:25 am in reply to: Is it proper for an adult to drink from a water fountain? #964787CuriosityParticipantI’m not sure what’s in Shoftim perek 7 because I was in yeshiva, not seminary (ask popa maybe), but I think my Rebbi was saying it’s undignified for a ben Torah, not for the hamon am.
July 7, 2013 8:41 pm at 8:41 pm in reply to: Is it proper for an adult to drink from a water fountain? #964779CuriosityParticipantMekublani mibeis rebbi that it’s undignified to bend over and drink like a horse from a trough.
CuriosityParticipantI’d take the most expensive car available, then sell it, so I can afford to pay for more important things.
CuriosityParticipanthumorless much?
CuriosityParticipantHe got a nose job to make his nose bigger.
He went to the Star-K to make sure his kosher phone is “Kosher for Passover, and all year round.”
Back in Europe, he had his sheep checked for shaatnez weekly.
CuriosityParticipantI’d want Clifford, the big, red dog.
CuriosityParticipantHealth. I disagree. You cannot use Hashem’s cheshbonos of who he saves and who he punishes to decide who has more worth. The Torah and chazal are very, very clear that a human being had a tzelem Elokim which animals do not have. That makes a human being’s life intrinsically more worthy than that of an animal’s. I did not say more “deserving,” only more inherently worthy.
Secondly, you misinterpret my carrot statement. I am not saying you have the same responsibility towards an animal as you do towards a carrot. I am only saying that their end goals are just the same: To be used by mankind to serve God. Whether that service is in the form of being used to feed anee’im, or in the form of being the means by which mankind exercises their compassion, is completely irrelevant. I am well aware of that Gemara and am not refuting it. The reason I made this statement was to refute rebdoniel’s implication that somehow evil human beings depreciate in value until they are worth less than animals. As proof, I propose you take a look back at parshas Balak and the Chazal discussing the reason for the death of Bilaam’s ancient and miraculous talking donkey, which happened as to not slight the honor of Bilaam- the Hitler of his days- who set out to commit genocidal annihilation against klal Israel.
CuriosityParticipantBTGuy-
I’m sorry, but your statements are not in line with Torah thought. As difficult as it is to understand, even the most vile, lowlife “yemach shmo” is intrinsically worth more than a boat full of the largest, rarest, and most magnificent of animals. Also, Noach’s sons in no way survived in the merit of animals, but rather in the merit of the chessed they performed on the animals and in helping Noach with his duties. Humans are ALWAYS more valuable than animals, and animals were only created as natural-resources to help humans in the service of God. Though they do contain some lower level of soul (nefesh) – their purpose in being created is no different than that of a carrot’s.
CuriosityParticipantRebdoniel, let’s say you first gave $99 to poor, sick, and needy people and to support Torah learning, and then you gave one dollar to the ASPCA or a similar organization. Do you not reckon that there is a poor widow or lonely orphan somewhere which could really use that dollar, but which you instead chose to give to the ASPCA to help a streetcat?
CuriosityParticipantyytz – again, I don’t disagree with those chazal. You entirely misunderstood the point of my OP.
CuriosityParticipantyitzchokm – I don’t know the source, but I have it on good authority that it is forbidden to have a goy neuter an animal, even for free. If that’s true, (somebody get to the roof and light the Sam2-signal) it sounds like a kal vchomer that you shouldn’t pay a goy to do it.
CuriosityParticipantWritersoul- I don’t believe they were broadcasting tv commercials in 1866. It seems to me that their commercials lately have been getting worse and worse.
CuriosityParticipantI’m waiting for a humorless individual to burst in here and start berating us for joking about killing stray animals… any minute now…
CuriosityParticipantYour question was, why should you not give tzedaka to the ASPCA. My answer is that using money set aside for the obligatory mitvah of tzedaka to give to “lesser causes” (which I don’t even agree are worthwhile causes at all – but that’s a different discussion) when you can use that limited amount of money for more important causes, is not only a lack of responsibility, but also a lack of compassion for the people that could use the money that you choose to give to the animals shelters, instead.
CuriosityParticipantCrossbows… kittens…
CuriosityParticipantAlso, JF02, I answered your question about why it is right to give tzedaka to some places over others at the top of the page, but it was a long post and hasn’t been approved yet…
CuriosityParticipantJF02 – You and Poppa should drive around town with crossbows and shoot stray animals. I think it will be a big mitzvah. 😉
CuriosityParticipantWritersoul – kind of the second thing you said. Except, it’s not the fact that they exist that I find symptomatic of what I described (and therefore, nothing to do with the ASPCA’s ideology as it was in 1866s), rather, it is the fact that their commercials, as of late, suggest certain very misguided hashkafas and priorities, and yet, they still receive a wide base of public approval and endorsement. THAT is what I see as an obvious symptom of up and coming sympathy for bestiality. They are not CAUSING moral deterioration (not directly, at least), but the success of their new methods and the new degree of underlying extremist undertones in their publications both indicate (to me) that society’s moral standards are fading at an alarmingly increasing rate.
CuriosityParticipantJF02. Chazal are very clear about money serving a purpose. We have a requirement to give tzedaka, and we have a cap as to how much tzedaka we are allowed to give (generally, 20% of net income). If I have yet to reach my cap, how could I take money that I set aside for tzedaka and give it to a dog instead of an orphan, widow, or yeshiva? It’s absurd – especially as a Jew, who has a strict obligation to support Torah learning. Maybe the goyim who have no chiyuv of tzedaka (that I know of) can use their money on lesser things, but only because they have no obligation to give tzedaka at all. But for a Jew to pay for a random stray animal is obscene when there are so many needy Jews in klall Yisrael. Since you seem to be fond of emotional arguments, I’ll say it like this: There are Jews that have lost families to terror, children lying on their death beds because they can’t afford better healthcare, single mothers whose husbands died and are now trying to raise children alone, thousands of children in Israel that go to sleep hungry every night because they only get fed in school, people that cannot afford to make food for yomim tovim and shabbasos, and lots more examples of your needy brothers and sisters – not even talking about non-Jewish people who suffer just as badly. In this context it is pure achzariyus to give tzedaka money to help stray animals – abused or not abused.
Thanks PBA, that could very well be. It was a long time ago when I heard this. It’s definitely assur though. I know it’s even assur to have a non-jew do it for you. I wonder if it would be halachically assur to give money to these organisations just for that reason alone – that we know they use the money for forbidden practices…hmm…
CuriosityParticipantJF02, I’m only 95% sure, because I haven’t personally seen it inside, but I have it from a reliable talmid chacham that spaying/neutering animals is tzaar baalei chayim deoraysa.
CuriosityParticipantyytz, thanks for the source finding. I don’t disagree with any of what you said, but (although legend has it I have been wrong once before) I don’t believe any of those poskim would say to provide animals with foster-homes and “love.”
writersoul – I have no clue how you gleaned your statements from mine, much less is that ‘exactly what I said.’ I was not alluding to the slippery slope argument. I was saying that the fact that we’ve gotten to the point where these commercials are mainstream indicates that the next two steps are not so far behind.
Mod, thank you for editing that last post.
CuriosityParticipantJF02 – My personal allocation of tzedaka money is none of your concern, but I do support Torah Mosdos. Rav Moshe Feinstein once said, the two questions people have never asked him are where to send their children to school, and where to give tzedaka money. Whether you should give your tzedaka to anee’im or yeshivas is a great question, but it’s completely irrelevant. The fact that you struggle in your decision as to whether to give your maaser to Chickens for Shabbos or BMG does not make it okay to give that money to an animal shelter, instead.
CuriosityParticipantJF02- You will notice I didn’t express any hatred towards another person. All I did was “lambast” an ideology and a misguided hashkafa that I view as being severly crooked, and lamented the fact that most of society is too out of touch with daas Torah and emes so as to even realize why/how it’s misguided. And yes, I feel that the people who fall for it are very stupid for falling for it. That doesn’t mean I hate them, as people. I just think they’re stupid. That’s an opinion.
edited
CuriosityParticipantI wasn’t concerned for your neshama. I was just making assumptions about it.
No disrespect to JF, but LOL!
-
AuthorPosts