Curiosity

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 701 through 750 (of 930 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Ask the opposite gender #989409
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Bump!!!!

    “Tall, dark, & handsome.”

    I understand handsome (duh), and tall makes some sense. What’s the “dark” thing all about? How dark, what kind of dark, tan dark or exotic foreigner dark?

    Also, it seems to me like current fashion for girls is to fall head over heels for the frail, boyish, Bieber look than the masculine manly look. Please help settle these recurring points of confusion!

    in reply to: how to give shidduch advice… question #891139
    Curiosity
    Participant

    NOMTW – I strongly disagree with your first premise. Getting a second opinion is very important, and does not show a lack of maturity. Farkert, it shows maturity in that you are willing to take into consideration the advice of others and that you don’t arrogantly look at yourself as an expert on everything.

    There is a Torah shmooze on Nadav & Avihu, the sons of Aaron, that states that if they had consulted with each other before bringing in the aish zara they wouldn’t have went through with it, and their lives would have been spared. It’s interesting because they both did the exact same action, and they did it together. You wouldn’t think that simply speaking out what they were doing to one another would have made a difference, but chaz”al teach us that it would have made all the difference.

    in reply to: If you could live anywhere, where would you live? #891017
    Curiosity
    Participant

    In a cozy log cabin in the Ozarks or in the New Mexican plains, living off the beautiful land in tranquility and learning Torah.

    in reply to: Paul Ryan #890915
    Curiosity
    Participant

    ‘Never trust a man with two first names,’ I always say.

    ….Well that’s not true… I never say that. ‘Never trust a politician,’ though. That I really do always say.

    in reply to: Chazaras hasha"tz, 7 or 6? #890762
    Curiosity
    Participant

    I think it’s a machlokes, but I wasn’t looking for a psak. I just wanted to know where it was written. But thank you anyway.

    Curiosity
    Participant

    rabbiofberlin – I disagree. I learned in a non Satmar, Litvish Yeshiva, and the way we were taught the mesorah is that it was against halacha to take the land away from the goyim to build a state on it. Especially a non Torah observant state in the name of Jews. But, since it de facto stands today as a country with many Jews living in it, we must do our hishtadlus to ensure their well being by supporting the security of the state. We also do everything we can to help Torah authorities take positions of power in its government. Lastly, I’ve heard a respected rav from the yeshiva call it “reishis tzmichas geulateinu” when saying mi sheberachs for Jewish soldiers, and I feel as though it is safe to assume he was acting in line with the Yeshiva mesorah. I’m not sure how other Yeshivas understand the Gemara.

    Curiosity
    Participant

    NOMTW, I think the point of misunderstanding between those pro and those against singing NA is the understanding for what NAs celebrate. You view singing the NA as recognition for the chayalim and America’s graciousness to the Jews. Those who oppose using the NA in Jewish events are of the opinion that an anthem celebrates the entire state, with all of its flaws, even those that the state itself doesn’t recognize as faults.

    The reason we oppose using anthems is not because we are Kofeh Tov to the soldiers or to America’s kindnesses. It’s because the anthems celebrate the ENTIRE structures that are the USA and Israel, two countries (among many others) whose governments pride themselves (no pun intended) in allowing freedoms for homosexuality, providing funds, support, and land trade agreements to terrorist sympathizers, having a pop culture that is dedicated to the corruption of tzniyus, and provides a haven for those who speak out against Hashem and against the Torah.

    If you sing the anthem you are praising an entire package, which includes things we are not allowed to condone. That’s why it’s far more appropriate to publicly state “thank you” or to say mi sheberachs which thank the governments in very specific terms, without condoning assur behavior and treif hashkafas.

    in reply to: How Often Do You Give Your Threads Tags? #890855
    Curiosity
    Participant

    If I could, I would give other people’s threads tags.

    in reply to: Becoming a troll… #891213
    Curiosity
    Participant

    I respect pba. I’m kind of new here, but everything I’ve seen so far has been in good taste. Then again, I’m the one who posted about putting Visine in people’s coffee so I’m not much of a rayiah. 😀

    in reply to: Chazaras hasha"tz, 7 or 6? #890760
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Thanx bud, I’ll have to look it up later when I’m near the sefer.

    in reply to: ages in Pirkei Avos #890755
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Because we’re much dumber and more distracted nowadays. Different times.

    in reply to: Everything But Learning Torah Is Treif! #890719
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Moskidoodle – do you remove your nose prior to eating?

    in reply to: Ailu v'ailu…please explain this concept #891998
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Why didn’t Rav Shach feel a need to say eilu v’eilu regarding the Lubavitcher Rebbe? We obviously see if your sheeta holds another sheeta is assur then there is no chiyuv to respect it as divrei Elokim.

    Of course, chazal often argued in Torah. I guess we must say that in those arguments one Rav could see the perspective of the other Rav as holding some validity, or at least felt that the other Rav was based in emes. If you hold somebody else’s opinion is based in sheker then you don’t need to respect it as divrei Elokim.

    It’s not our call to judge whether an opinion that comes out of the mouth of someone respected as a Gadol is based in emes or sheker, but if another Gadol states a judgement on an opinion as being sheker then we have the right to stand behind him.

    Curiosity
    Participant

    I don’t understand why this discussion has degraded into who is pro- or against the medina. It’s totally irrelevant! I am very pro the medina, but I hold it’s krum as a pretzel!

    It’s not a paradox to wish for the continued well being of the de-facto State of Israel, but at the same time to realize the establishment was against our promise to the nations (as is brought down in maseches Ksubos), and to admit that the current character of the country is a far cry away from Torah ideals. We don’t support the methods of the Israeli government, but we wish for their continued existence for the sake of the lives of all of the Jewish inhabitants there who are in a tremendous makom sakana 24/7.

    The national anthem is a man-made (not Torah based) song of praise to the democratic establishment of the state. The Torah does not believe in democracy, and therefore neither should we. When Mashiach comes and the gedolei hador write a national anthem in honor of the reestablishment of malchus Dovid, we can sing that song at the Siyum Hashas. Deal?

    Curiosity
    Participant

    bklynmom, as shlishi said, davening for Jews in harms’ way, or even non-Jews who lemaysah protect Jews is not a nationalistic thing. You could have mentioned the fact that many shuls say a mi sheberach for the US president. That would have been a much stronger question, but the answer to that is that we are blessing him that he may do what’s favorable in Hashem’s eyes and be gracious to the Jews living in his country. We haven’t a care in the world if he gets impeached tomorrow, if somebody who is more moral & more pro-Torah takes his place.

    in reply to: Riddles #1050087
    Curiosity
    Participant

    557 – I was assuming you were going with the classical interpretation of rodef and nirdaf. How can one 2 dimensional point by a rodef? Furthermore, a nirdaf is allowed to kill a rodef. Assuming they were both people, moving at sprinting pace, a gun would have worked for either of them.

    If they’re in a “closed” two dimensional circle (I guess this can be imagined like a circular pair of train tracks), and they both move at light speed, then they can’t catch eachother unless one of them breaks the circle…. Or if the rodef blocks the circle with some object and then corners the nirdaf on it.. your rules aren’t very clear.

    in reply to: Pranks I wouldn't do on my worst enemy #988835
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Lol no clue who, but you said 2 people “stupider than this thread.” Being that I’m part of the instigation here, I’d take it that I’m the 3rd or 4th stupidest (also not a word) in the CR?

    Hmm how about using steel strength epoxy glue to glue down everything in somebody’s room? …Oh wait, I’ve actually done that to a friend of mine. 🙂 twas a good laugh.

    in reply to: Pranks I wouldn't do on my worst enemy #988830
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Moskidoodle – stupider isn’t a word, but thank you for the insult.

    in reply to: Riddles #1050084
    Curiosity
    Participant

    557 – guns

    Curiosity
    Participant

    “The medina was the start of the geula”

    – true. So was the holocaust. It doesn’t mean we should celebrate it. The building of the medina by the atheist zionists was probably more spiritually destructive to klall Yisrael than anything in the past 100 years. Furthermore, it was assur to establish the state, and it’s very bedi’eved. Don’t get me wrong, I hate Neturei Karta, they’re totally evil. De facto, Israel exists and we must support it to protect our interests, but we shouldn’t love governments that are rooted in anything but the Derech Hashem. Neither Israel nor the USA are that. We say thank you, but we don’t sing their songs of praise and become nationalists like their godless masses. This whole thread is a non-issue. Anyone with any semblance of a Yeshiva education realizes that trying to argue this is daas Torah is completely baseless and absurd.

    in reply to: Pranks I wouldn't do on my worst enemy #988826
    Curiosity
    Participant

    I’ve got the feeling somebody’s had one too many drops of Visine slipped into their coffee….

    in reply to: well duh !?!?!?? #915689
    Curiosity
    Participant

    OMG Yessss! People see me holding a motorcycle helmet and they’re like, “hey, do you ride a bike?” I’ll sometimes say, “Nope. Formula 1 racecar,” with a perfectly straight face. If they just say, “Oh,” that’s when you know they’re a lost cause.

    in reply to: Riddles #1050080
    Curiosity
    Participant

    The people that mow lawns here are poor immigrants and they all have lawnmowers. The rich people need these folks to bring their lawnmowers and mow their lawns, and… Well… Have you ever tried eating a lawnmower?

    in reply to: Who's Who in the CR? #891170
    Curiosity
    Participant

    I am intolerant of tolerance. If God says it’s okay, then it’s okay.

    Sometimes, when the full moon comes out, I turn into a cynical troll.

    in reply to: Riddles #1050074
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Lawnmowers?

    in reply to: Pranks I wouldn't do on my worst enemy #988822
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Zeeskite – that’s just crossing the line. Why do happy go lucky people feel like they always have the right to ruin the bitter cynical people’s days?

    in reply to: Becoming a troll… #891199
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Pba, is that hair growing out of the hair growing out your ears??

    in reply to: Pranks I wouldn't do on my worst enemy #988821
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Nitpicker… The title is, stuff you “WOULDN’T” do to your worst enemy. In case you aren’t aware, “wouldn’t” is a conjunction of the words “would” and “not”. It’s the opposite of stuff you WOULD do. Get off your high horse. Just because you have no sense of humor doesn’t make everyone else wrong.

    in reply to: Married Women Learning Daf Yomi? #1028257
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Kozov, we’re still debating how shelo lishma ba lishma could ever apply to women who aren’t metzuveh to learn Torah.

    in reply to: Rabbeinu Chananel in Brachos #890239
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Haleivi. I know some masechtas in classical gemara publishers have a different perush in the exact same place and same font as R’ Chananel.. I think it’s R’ Gershom or something like that and Tosfos Yeshanim (I think that’s what it’s called it’s been a while since I looked at those gemaras). Are you sure you aren’t confusing the two?

    in reply to: Singles Weekends #890357
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Can we stop getting off topic please?! The Goq, what kind of food did they have at the buffets???

    in reply to: Pranks I wouldn't do on my worst enemy #988818
    Curiosity
    Participant

    moski, if your worst enemy is dumb enough to have money in their mouth when coming out of the yichud room, there’s nothing you can do to embarrass them. But that was a funny reply.

    How about putting a few drops of Visine in someone’s coffee?

    in reply to: Can anyone explain going to Uman? #890199
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Yytz, that’s a fair answer. Yasher Koach.

    in reply to: Singles Weekends #890353
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Was the food any good?

    in reply to: know any frum vegetarians or vegans? #918534
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Sam2 I was totally joking.

    I completely failed on the italics there… Kept pushing edit and trying it differently until it was too late. Could anyone please explain or link me to a thread that explains how to use the code in this forum for italics and bold? I know basic coding in Java, HTML, and C, but I just can’t for the life of me figure this one out. The coding instructions on the bottom are just confusing me.

    in reply to: Can anyone explain going to Uman? #890190
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Yytz – I suspected what you said – that Rav Nachman WANTED husbands to come with their wives when visiting him. I was setting the conversation up for my next kasha:

    A classic step in learning is the principle of “smallest machlokes”. Whereby, if you have two opinions who argue about a specific point you assume the point of argument that causes the disagreement is as small as possible and that both opinions agree on everything except the point of conflict. Thus, if you know what Rabbi A holds legabey x and y, and you what Rabbi B holds only legabey y; you should assume that they both agree on x, and you may use this assumption as a tool in uncovering what the root for the machlokes on y is, and for clarifying each opinion.

    That being said, you quoted reliable sources that display R’ Nachman’s daas Torah was for husband and wife to come together when they visit him in life. He did not predict the impracticality of wives coming after his death, and therefore did not discuss it. As was mentioned on the thread earlier, there are great poskim whose daas Torah is that husbands should NOT separate from wives for Rosh Hashana to go to kivrei tzadikim. In context of the previous paragraph, what halachic right do we have to assume that Rav Nachman would have argued with the Daas Torah of these poskim, when we don’t know explicitly that he did?

    in reply to: Tznius gone too far #890326
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Shopping613 I agree with YehudaYona about words on clothing. Showing off is also a lack of tznius (not to mention arrogance) and brandishing an expensive or chashuv “name brand” when there are similar clothes without labels imprinted on them is showing off your money, your stature, your lavish sense of “style”. Not tznius.

    in reply to: Tznius gone too far #890325
    Curiosity
    Participant

    The Torah says don’t stray right or left. There is such a thing as going overboard in fumkite where the gemara states, “are the Torah’s own restrictions not enough for you that you need to create more?” Unfortunately we see it with people spitting on little girls whose clothes are the “wrong color”, and throwing rocks at cars on Shabbos. They think they’re being frum when in reality they are off the derech. Yes, the derech can be strayed off to the left AND to the right. Being off the derech doesn’t just start at rock throwing though, and we need gedolim to tell us what is the derech and what is not. Burqas are NOT the derech for our day and age, just like taking multiple wives is not the derech, and just like wearing tfillin all day is not the derech.

    Curiosity
    Participant

    NOMTW, the reality is that the government in Israel is plagued by anti-Torah, anti-dati stances. The Tikva and the Star Spangled Banner are both creations that celebrate secular governments that are krum and immoral. The Siyum Hashas is a celebration of Torah that is Kadosh and irrelevant to manmade councils of government. The world was created for Torah and the most powerful governments in the world are not even dirt in their importance compared to the Torah hakedosha. We try to be mavdil between kodesh and chol as much as possible. Shall we not be mavdil between kodesh and tuma’ah all the more?

    in reply to: ghotio #948782
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Sending this to my mother 🙂 English is her second language.

    in reply to: know any frum vegetarians or vegans? #918532
    Curiosity
    Participant

    It should be a chiyuv to tell your shidduch date if you’re a vegetarian.

    Would you want a your /a wife to not cook meat?

    in reply to: Everything But Learning Torah Is Treif! #890702
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Using the internet is assur!!

    in reply to: Can anyone explain going to Uman? #890182
    Curiosity
    Participant

    yytz – its nice of someone to finally quote some sources. I have a few kashas on those sources though.

    First, does “Everyone, without exception, who counts himself as one of my followers or takes heed of what I say” exclude wives? I’m curious as to when R’Nachman was alive if it was only men who visited him or whole families.

    Second, everything you quoted from his words sounds as if it would be relevant to only while he was still alive. You mention he “indicated” that it should apply even afterwards. Did he say it or did he not say it, and if he didn’t then why not?

    Third, the quote I mentioned above clearly excludes people who were not his followers. I don’t see where his followers get reshus to collect money from non-Bresluvers to sponsor the event and tell them it’s for tzedaka. Is it tzedaka for someone to sponsor a minhag that their own posek holds is not allowed? Is it a mitzvah to recruit someone to practice a minhag that isn’t their mesorah?

    in reply to: Tznius gone too far #890310
    Curiosity
    Participant

    A mamin – in defense of Health, “lefum tzara agra” works both ways. When a nisayon is more difficult you get punished less for tansgressing.

    in reply to: Embarrassing Stories #1033392
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Mommamia – did u kick a football into her head?

    in reply to: Wife/Mother sitting at head of shabbos table? #890751
    Curiosity
    Participant

    147 – trolling?

    in reply to: "Live and let live" #890506
    Curiosity
    Participant

    It’s uncalled for to preach “live and let live” to someone when we are just discussing a subject. Just because someone has an opinion that you disagree with doesn’t mean that they are sitting in judgement and need to be rebuked. The CR should be used for discussion and sharing of opinions, not for admonition and chastisement. When we discuss women learning gemara or people going to Uman, nobody should get defensive to have to tell others to leave them alone – or live and let live. It’s just a discussion, nothing more. You can listen, learn, and contribute. Don’t feel like someone with an opinion is someone who condones telling people what to do.

    I was one of the more machmir people on the “tznius in Brooklyn” thread, and I said you should NOT approach people and tell them they are untznius, and that most people nowadays are unable to give tochacha properly. On the other hand, I hold women learning Gemara and going to Uman are both wrong. This doesn’t make me a hypocrite. I never said we should scorn people who do this. It’s just a discussion. So there’s no need to tell people to “live and let live”, which is not an ideal Torah concept – kol Yisrael areivim zeh lazeh.

    in reply to: Can anyone explain going to Uman? #890167
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Can we stop comparing making a pilgrimage to a grave, to going to get eitza from your rav?

    Kozov, going to Meron is just a convenient venue to hold the hillula and makes it more meaningful, many congregations around the world have the same hillula without going to Meron. People don’t go there to ask Rashbi to absolve their sins in Shamayim. It’s totally different.

    in reply to: teachers tying the children's shoelaces. #939634
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Ok

    in reply to: Tznius gone too far #890298
    Curiosity
    Participant

    Shlishi – anyone can publish a book. The question is who?

Viewing 50 posts - 701 through 750 (of 930 total)