Ex-CTLawyer

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 251 through 300 (of 3,279 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Ten Commandments Posted in Public Schools #2194974
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Neville
    How do mom&pops compete in CT Liquor business?
    Easy, we have state minimum pricing on every alcoholic product, both at wholesale and retail level.
    The mom&pop pays the distributor the same price as Costco or Total and sells at the same minimum price. The only advantage the big guy has is that he probably always buys at the case price, while a mom&pop may pay the individual minimum price on less than case purchases. This affects profit but not retail minimum selling price.
    In CT, buying a liquor store is buying yourself a job, not a get rich investment. Only so many stores per thousands of population can open in a town and not within 1500 feet of another liquor retailer, church/synagogue/mosque, school or day care. My town of approximately 40,000 has 5 liquor stores and I believe it could have 7, but no one has bothered to apply for another permit in the past 7 years

    in reply to: Ten Commandments Posted in Public Schools #2194973
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Neville
    Regarding liqour sales in CT
    When I was a child, stores could be open 6 days a week from 8am til 11pm No one could own more than 2 stores. The mom&pop owners got the state to cut hours to 8am-8pm as they did not want to work so many hours.
    in 2012 when Sunday sales were allowed, it was again the liquor store owners who asked that it only b 6 hours 11am-5pm to restrict how many hours these mom&pop operators worked in a week. The number of stores you can own increased to three. So for an eample, only 3 of the Costco locations in CT can sell booze.
    You cannot buy wine in a grocery store, only beer.
    Liqour store can n ow be open til 9, but most close at 8, with a few open Frioday and Saturday til 9.

    The last vestige of the Blue laws, was that auto dealers could not be open on Sunday. The dealers fought this saying they were losing sales to NY, MA and RI. The law changed a few years back, but most dealers, not on the state borders remained closed on Sunday.

    I was born and grew up in New Haven, where you still don’t find car dealers open Friday nights. Back then the dealers were almost all Jewish and Friday night was reserved for family, not business. Today, most dealers are not Jewish, but the closed Friday night tradition continues.

    in reply to: Ten Commandments Posted in Public Schools #2194844
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @lakewhut
    My filing the suit against the Charter school, has nothing to do with my political affiliation, I was asked to do so by a group of Jewish Republican Conservatives who do not wish to have tax dollars paying for this prayer to be recited.
    Charter schools are not the same as vouchers. Every time a child is enrolled in a Charter school the school gets the amount of money the municipality would fund the public school for educating that child. BUT, they are for profit with large corporations taking 15% profits (in our area). The also (unlike public schools) can turn down special needs or troublesome children that require additional resources and expenses.

    BTW>>>>My day job is NOT to uphold the laws of the Constitution. I affirmed that I would support and defend the Constitutions of the United States and State of Connecticut, that is not the same thing.
    Going after violators of the Constitution is SUPPORTING and DEFENDING it.

    Also, you do not know my position on every issue, so your accusation is both laughable and false.

    in reply to: Ten Commandments Posted in Public Schools #2194837
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Neville
    The CT Blue Laws had far more to do with business activity and public displays of affection on the Sabbath, then liquor sales.
    They were done away with starting in 1909, 1979 did away with ban on Sunday retailing and 2012 allowed Sunday liquor sales.
    When I was a kid, my family’s retail stores were open Sunday and closed Saturday in compliance with the laws.
    CT Liquor store owners opposed Sunday openings, as we have no chains, mom&pop didn’t want to work 7 days per week.

    in reply to: Ten Commandments Posted in Public Schools #2194774
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Lakwhut
    The 21st Amendment of the US Constitution specifically recognizes the rights of states and territories of the USA to prohibit the transportation into, importation into or possession of intoxicating liquors in violation of the laws of the state or territory.

    It cannot not be a States Rights argument as it applies to territories as well as states.

    This is NOT States Rights as you claim in error. States Rights is a function of the Tenth Amendment which specifically reserves to the states or the people those rights not specifically assigned to the federal government in the constitution (such as foreign relations, coining money, etc.).

    Please don’t give up your day job, and remember that mine is the practice of law.

    in reply to: Ten Commandments Posted in Public Schools #2194772
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Lakewhut
    Regarding Danbury Baptists and their letter to the federal government seeking redress.

    CT (my home for almost 70 years) like most of New England was settled by the Puritans (Congregational Churches). Each village had a parish and the minister served as head of government and tax collector. This continued to the middle of the 1800s, long after the USA was a country and the US Constitution in force.
    My small town has 4 distinct neighborhoods, each was a parish and still has an active Congregational Church bearing the name.
    Until the early 1900s, any religious institution wanting to operate in CT had to get a Charter from the State of Connecticut. My shul received its charter in 1881. My FIL is buried in a local Jewish cemetery that received its charter in 1918.

    This issuing of charters (and requirement thereof) established State approved religions in direct violation of the First Amendment.
    BTW, males who wished to vote in the State of CT before approx 1850 had to be members of the Congregational Church in their Parish and current with tax obligations. Another violation of the First Amendment.

    in reply to: Ten Commandments Posted in Public Schools #2194770
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Always Ask Questions
    Your theory of state funded schools being exempt from the First Amendment is false.
    Every public school in the USA receives federal funds, which is why they are BOUND by the guaranties and restrictions of the US Constitution.
    Vouchers are also in part funded by federal dollars which presents additional problems and opens the way for more lawsuits. (I filed one in CT against a charter school taking public funds that starts the day with the Lord’s Prayer).

    in reply to: What Happened To the Forum I Loved so Well? #2189152
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Neville
    My fiscal conservatism is not just from my personal pocket, but society as a whole.
    That’s why I believe in user fees, such as tolls (which don’t exist in CT) so the user pays for the upkeep of the roads.

    As for the orthodox synagogues of my youth. They did not have mechitzas, they had balconies.

    in reply to: What Happened To the Forum I Loved so Well? #2188419
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @mentsch1
    I do not live in NY, nor do I wish to do so. After my 120, I shall join my forebears in the family plot in Queens. No chance of me owning a gun in the grave.

    BTW> you label the NY Guard an unorganized militia and as such it would not fall under the 2nd Amendment.

    B ing liable to a call up, but not sworn I. Does not make one a member of the Guard.

    in reply to: What Happened To the Forum I Loved so Well? #2188007
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @coffee
    I haven’t been called a ‘lefty’ since I was protesting the Viet Nam War and burning my draft card more than 50 years ago.
    Yes, I am a proud Democrat, but that doesn’t mean I support every idea floated by every Democrat. At the State and National Conventions I am viewed as old fashioned and right wing.
    I am socially liberal but fiscally conservative. I am anti-gun and believe no private citizen unless a sworn law enforcement officer or member of the National Guard (the well regulated militia mentioned in the 2nd Amendment) should possess a gun.

    I have watched American Orthodoxy move to the right over the past 60 years. While I may not find all the moves to my taste, I support the institutions.
    I am one of the final generation of American Euro-Traditional Jews. What was called Orthodox in my youth. We were the children of business owners and professionals. Many attended public school and Yeshiva as well as university and professional schools. What we didn’t do as a whole is become professional Jews, deriving our income from Jewish organizations, instead we fund those salaries and positions.

    in reply to: Not for Women Only #2187526
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Zeruth
    You misread my comment, I said I don’t know if I witjust need pills or pills and chemotherapy. Find out in another week.
    But genetic testing came back negative today. No propensity for pancreatic or prostate cancer

    in reply to: Not for Women Only #2187346
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Zeruth
    The surgery is behind me, treatment is ahead. I will not know for another week if it will just be pulls or pills and chemotherapy. Awaiting results of lab work.

    The important thing is B”H I caught it before it spread and was persisent in fast diagnosis, testing and surgery

    in reply to: You should get a dog. #2187240
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Mentsch1
    My nephew had an English Mastiff that weighed 185 pounds, his children did ride it until they were about 8 years old

    in reply to: You should get a dog. #2187017
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Mentsch1
    Since our dogs range in weight from 6-13 lbs, the risk of them eating us is not a concern.

    in reply to: You should get a dog. #2186865
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @mentsch1
    I have 5 dogs. I live in small town America on sufficient acreage that the dogs have a half acre fenced area to run and play and poop. I open a door into the fenced area and out they go. I have never had to walk a dog or clean up their waste.
    They were great comfort to Mrs. CTL I. Her multi year confined illness prior to death and helpful to me in my adjustment to widowed life.
    I would not want to have a dog in an apartment and have to walk the dog at all hours and in all kinds of weather.

    in reply to: Seditious Ted Cruz and the rest of the coup plotting Republicans #2184255
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Send Cruz back to the country if his birth

    in reply to: What are your thoughts about Kennedy?? #2183140
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Another spoiled rich kid who should keep his mouth shut

    in reply to: why is Yeshiva world news bashing trump non stop #2181800
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @coffeeaddict
    I don’t decide which ‘news’ articles to post
    I merely answered the OP’s question

    @lakewhut
    The OP did not ask a question about the current POTUS

    @zeruth
    I voluntarily had two Covid-19 vaccinations and three boosters including the bivalent. I don’t allow non-vaccinated into my home of office.

    in reply to: why is Yeshiva world news bashing trump non stop #2181746
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    He’s a charlatan, a grifter, an adulterer, a deadbeat, a liar and the list goes on and on

    in reply to: Mass shootings, and non mass shootings, must stop. #2181347
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @americanyeshivish

    Better the shooter is dead at the beginning of an intended shooting spree, having killed him/herself,

    Take all guns away in the USA unless the possessor is a member of the National Guard, law enforcement or corrections (our well organized militia, satisfying the 2nd Amendment).

    in reply to: Erez Yisrael or stay in Galut? #2178271
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Depends how fast I can get the tenants out of the family house in EY.
    There is no ‘Lease terminates on appearance of Moshiach’ clause.

    in reply to: Flying to Israel #2176279
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @ujm

    I generally fly first class and have done so for more than 60 years.
    I don’t do it for the wines and foods I cannot consume. I have done so for the comfort and quiet and ability to get work done.
    In the 80s I flew about a half million miles per year with bi-weekly trips to Europe. I would leave my office here at 5pm, make a 8 pm TWA flight to London or Paris. I would work most of the night preparing for meetings that began at 9am soon after my arrival. I also made a half dozen flights each year to EY, South Africa and Brazil plus an annual flight to Australia.
    By the 90s I was flying to China each month. My clients paid these costs but it was important to arrive fresh and ready for business.
    That said, I do not like the modern pods that isolate First Class (and business class) travelers from each other. The pods defeat the ability for two of us to work together on a long flight. I really miss the days of an upstairs lounge in early B747s where we could spread papers out on a table and sit facing each other and plan strategies.
    Nowadays, if three or more of us from the CTL law firm are flying together on business, we are likely to fly private. It is not much more expensive than first (for our clients) and they are not paying for us yk have to arrive at the airport hours early and pay X hundreds of dollars per hour for non-productive time. It also allows us to fly into smaller airports that may be closer to our destination and that also saves time and money.

    If I am working on a 14 hour flight I do not want to be disturbed by children or bumped by people trying to get through the aisle to reach a lavatory or food service carts. Lastly, I need to protect the privacy of my work.

    BTW, when I went to Budapest this month for my dental work, I flew premium economy (using miles). I was not doing any work and didn’t need the privacy and space. I flew home in a private jet that belongs to a client. His wife and children had been dropped off in Vienna and it was returning to Teterboro empty.

    in reply to: Dental Insurance #2175964
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Avram in MD
    Some states, especially mine, set up excellent healthcare exchanges. Connecticut’s exchange works well, is staffed by knowledgeable, caring staff who are able to fully explain thd system and handle enrollment. Youngest child just aged out of parental plan coverage.
    Half hour toll free call to the exchange and application completed. Compared the products offered, made a choice. Ten days later had her insurance cards from the carrier.
    Even received follow up calls to make sure she received all paperwork and answer any questions she might have.

    in reply to: Dental Insurance #2175813
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    So back to Dental insurance and cost of dental procedures. It is now the end of March and I have been to Budapest for my two implants.
    They were done in the same Swiss Method Dental practice at The Thermal Hotel and Spa where I had a few crowns done in 1988. They still had all my records.
    My all in costs came to $4300. Locally, the cost was $20,000.
    Medical and Dental tourism is a thriving international business.
    Could I have paid the $20,000? Yes, but I don’t waste or squander capital, it is better spent on my grandchildren and Tzedaka.
    >>>>>>>>>>€>>€€€€€
    As a side note, my original comments about the cost of Mrs. CTL’s care took place during the past few years with Covid protocols in place.
    Her final 12 days in ICU required 200 masks, gowns and glove changes each day (every time someone entered the room they needed fresh PPE.
    Our local hospitals are no longer billing a surcharge for these no longer required expenses

    in reply to: Lock him up #2175129
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @ujm
    You call it a political persecution, I call it a long overdue prosecution

    in reply to: I don’t like Donald Trump, but… #2174956
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Yeserbius123

    You are not hated by everyone. I disagree with your political beliefs, but don’t hate you. I defend your right to express your beliefs and vote for the candidates of your choice.

    BTW, it is possible to be a Democrat and be a law and order kind of guy. I would love to see Trump prosecuted, tried convicted and imprisoned. But I also would like that to happen to all crooked elected officials who have broken the law, as well as street thugs, blue collar criminals and white collar criminals.

    in reply to: Lock him up #2174954
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @besalel
    Everything about Trump was/is a joke, albeit a sick one. The American people were the butt of his jokes.

    BTW, who did the Democrats put in Jail? A political party in the USA has no power to arrest, try, convict and sentence.

    But, you are typical of the MAGA nuts, you don’t let facts color your opinion, you show hatred to the majority party and unwavering adherence to the orange one (May he soon be clothed in a matching prison jumpsuit).

    in reply to: Shtultz #2170676
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @AAQ
    Despite your name, sometimes not being asked is a relief.

    in reply to: Shtultz #2170350
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @ujm
    Completely agree with your comment about being invited home for Shabbos meal.
    This Litvish misnagid wears a dark blue suit, not black (as I’ve posted many times: in my business black is reserved for judges).
    Saying Kaddish for Mrs. CTL this year has taken be to many different minyanim. I often stay in our house in Brooklyn and enjoy visiting new to me shuls.
    Always invitations in Satmar, Bobov and Chabad.
    If I go into a Litvish or MO minyan after the first Kaddish someone will inquire for whom I am saying Kaddish. As soon as I say my wife I hear whispering. Then the invitations arrive, typically for someone with an unmarried 40+ daughter working as an accountant, paralegal or attorney.
    The Chasidim give real Hachnosses Orchim invitations, the others see me as a pigeon

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2169486
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @aaq
    If coming soon, Moshiach would be better off speaking Spanish than Italian since the current Pope is Argentinian.

    I, however, took 6 years of Latin in high school and college. I don’t listen to Radio Vatican, but it made law school easier for me than classmates with no Latin knowledge.

    in reply to: Shalach Manos – Is Bourbon a food? #2169410
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    It is if it’s the glaze on steak or wings.

    in reply to: The Five Most Likeliest Candidates to be Moshiach #2169408
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    This post is a prime example why more time needs to be spent learning English in Yeshivos.
    “Most likeliest “
    Est ending means most.
    What a waste of a modifier.
    Bittul zman through ignorance.
    No charge for this lesson in English grammar.
    BTW, I thought Joseph claimed to be a teacher in the NY public schools.

    in reply to: Pompeo #2166691
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Mr. Oil Business
    Get ready for $10 gallon gas and heating oil

    in reply to: Dental Insurance #2165232
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Haven’t had ACA in about 5 years as I aged out. It gave me the savings benefit of a huge statewide group not the income based subsidy. It also had better benefits for same level plan from same carrier I had before ACA.
    Connecticut did/does a much better job with ACA and our state exchange than most other states. Should the federal program cease due to court challenges or Congressional whim the Connecticut program will continue independently.
    This afternoon a neighbor came by with some questions about tax forms for short term disability (he is having a knee replacement). I reviewed his situation, explained how to fill out the forms and then looked at his health insurance plans. We determined he would save more than 30% buying his coverage through the exchange than the small group from his employer. Since he recently had another child, I pointed out it was a qualifying life changing event and he could change his insurance despite being outside the annual enrollment period. We did it all on line. Not only will he save on his monthly cost, but his out of pocket for the surgery (all in) will be reduced by about $1000.
    This was just a friendly chat with a neighbor, not billable client work. When Mrs. CTL died, his teens were here every day during shiva, setting up chairs, taking out garbage, parking visitors cars, etc. They are not Jewish but understand small town neighbors help neighbors without being asked.

    in reply to: Dental Insurance #2165119
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @AAQ
    You far over estimate both what I take in personal income and the taxes I pay. The tax laws benefit those with substantial assets allowing minimization of income taxes. Due to exoduses of wholly owned businesses in our personal returns, our effective Federal Income Tax rate has never exceeded 7% in the past 30 years. Mrs. CTL hadn’t been in the Social Security system for a decade before her death. I draw a moderate salary, preferring to leave retained earning in the firm. I don’t need the cash.
    When reveal real estate we own has been fully depreciated (giving us offsets gif income), instead of selling and paying taxes in a gain from the new reduced cost basis of zero, we engage I. Like kind exchanges and get to start depreciating all over in the same money investment but from a much higher new market value.
    Property in Mrs. CTL’s personal name passed to me under the terms of her will, tax free, and I get to start the depreciation all over, we made sure to keep her personal estate below the point where estate taxes would be due. But, I am an estate and trusts attorney and tax specialist and know how to make the system work.
    I have never lobbied or contributed to legislators to make the laws to my advantage, but use the regulations to my advantage.
    The 3 million in medical bills would have been beyond my cash holdings, that is why I believe in insurance. My old posts will show I was( still am) a supporter of ACA. Saved me loads in premiums and met our needs nicely.
    Youngest daughter turns 26 this month and must go off parental insurance. The company policy is not as good or inexpensive as that available through the CT healthcare exchange, so she will buy via ACA.

    I support a single payer national insurance plan. I also support allowing insurers to sell across state lines to lower costs. My carrier now has a network in NY, FL and IL so if I should choose to spend time I. The family home in Brooklyn or the place in Boynton Beach I don’t have to worry about out of network uncovered expenses

    in reply to: Marriage for widowed seniors… #2165018
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @BrooklynGirl
    Thanks for your advice, please be aware that I am a Trust Attorney who also does wills and estates,
    All of the children and grandchildren have been well provided for. Most real estate is already in trusts, Mrs. CTL’s jewelry has already gone to daughters and granddaughters. Family heirlooms will not pass out of the family,
    I regularly write prenuptial agreements gif clients and have for more than 40 years. Because I still run the law firm I have no plans to relocate. I would not move a new wife into the home Mrs. CTL built and designed and decorated. However, there are properties adjoining the CTL compound suitable for building a new senior friendly residence.
    As for a family meeting, my children approached me during Chanukah to let me know they were in favor of my finding a new spouse. My 35 year old daughter put it bluntly that she did not want to spend the rest of her life without a mother or have me without a wife.
    It is my observation from 40+ years practicing family law that those who have lost a spouse and had a good/happy marriage are far more interested in another marriage than those who have had unhappy marriages. I had a very happy and successful marriage

    in reply to: Dental Insurance #2164997
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Dr.P
    I question your statement that the bill of healthcare expenses could be avoided if people took care of themselves from a young age.

    Mrs. CTL suffered and died as the result of a congenital birth defect that did not make itself known until she was 60 years old.
    I and each of my siblings and parents and in-laws had cataract surgeries Post age 65. Nothing we could have done a young age to prevent this.
    I had Carpal Tunnel surgery last year, again nothing done as a youth could prevent it. Genetic diseases can not be prevented and costs avoided by lifestyle choices.
    Diet and exercise can only do so much
    Mrs. CTL’s medical costs exceeded $3,000,000
    I am far from poor but could not have afforded this without insurance. Prior to age 65 she was on a policy bought through the Connecticut Health Care Exchange (ACA) at a very reasonable rate. Prior to ACA her policy from the same carrier had a lifetime cap of $1,000,000. Those caps went out the window when ACA became law, as did prior existing conditions as a disqualifying factor. We had a Medicare Advantage Plan from the same carrier after age 65.
    One thing I discovered about choosing a plan is that you should choose the HMO option over the PPO option if your doctors abc hospitals are in the plan (every one of ours was). In an HMO plan, if a participating provider performs and bills for a service that is denied by the carrier, the insured is not liable for the bill. I have seen this notation on more than $100,000 in billings on our EOBs in the past two years.

    in reply to: Shame on EVERY Democrat – re Islamist-bigot Ilhan Omar #2164356
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Goodtoknow
    I am not a fanatic about anything
    I choose my terms/words carefully
    I wrote about some, not all of most police officers and I believe some are in fact Facist
    Being Facist is not illegal in the US (it was cause for imprisonment without being charged or convicted in 1940s Britain), but not something I like.

    I don’t like the extreme right or left in most things

    in reply to: Marriage for widowed seniors… #2164339
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Coffee
    You missed #3 in BubbiTex’s comment.
    She would only consider someone local or willing to move to her community.

    I must assume the Tex in her screen name stands for Texas and not Textile.

    CTLawyer is not about to start qualifying for the bar and building a clientele from scratch at this stage of life.

    I am admitted in Ct, MA, NY and FL. I have no desire to live in FL

    in reply to: Different Tracks of Modern Orthodoxy #2164267
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Yserbius
    I was not saying it was allowed. I was commenting on the type of bathing costume worn 100+ years ago (before air conditioning) and why it may have been tolerated

    in reply to: Different Tracks of Modern Orthodoxy #2164150
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    I am amused reading these posts about mixed swimming and then talking about 100-125 years ago.

    Our family was in the clothing business, both manufacturing and retailing from 1890-1995.

    Bathing attire 100 years ago was more tznius than average non-frum street clothing of the past 60 years.

    There were no exposed midriffs, both men and women wore full tops, no short, shorts and the bathing costumes were a dark heavy material, ladies in long sleeves.

    in reply to: How to Reduce the Cost of Getting Married #2163806
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @goldersgreener
    You may live in an island but can’t stop trends from infiltrating your borders.
    As for meat carving stations at simchas it was commonplace in Connecticut 60 years ago, if it just arrived in GG, chances are it has something to do with the traditional abundance of beef in the new world and that it was relatively cheap.
    My mother served meat twice a day when we were growing up (except Shavous and the nine days). She always claimed it was cheaper and more available than dairy or fish.

    in reply to: Shame on EVERY Democrat – re Islamist-bigot Ilhan Omar #2163598
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Dbrim
    Employees do call in sick from time to
    time, but police are unusual in getting unlimited sick time.
    I don’t practice personal injury law. Last year my Son in law represented a homeowner being sued by a handyman who claimed he was injured on the job. Records showed the handyman was a cop who had called in sick for the 8 days he was painting the house for the homeowner.
    The injury turned out to be bogus and he was dismissed from his police position after losing a contract obligated arbitration. He took a plea deal to avoid prison time for an assortment of crimes committed running a long time handyman side business while on the municipal clock, but he did lose his pension.
    I don’t object to an employee taking an occasional sick day when not really ill, but in need of a mental health day. I do object to the employee being paid for the sick day and also other work for the same time period.

    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @5T
    Big thumbs, small keyboard layout on phone

    in reply to: Shame on EVERY Democrat – re Islamist-bigot Ilhan Omar #2163370
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Brim…
    Venezuela is Marxist not Socialist. Read my comment and see that they are excluded from the list of Socialist multi-party countries in the world.

    in reply to: Shame on EVERY Democrat – re Islamist-bigot Ilhan Omar #2163368
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @dbrim
    I stand behind my comment that many police are both criminals and/or racist,
    I did not post most and am not part of the ‘defund the police’ group.

    My town’s police force has been sanctioned by the state for racial profiling. Driving while black is treated as a criminal act.
    A good number of police have been found guilty of all types of crimes: from assaulting civilians, padding payroll, theft of seized drugs, etc.
    Police get unlimited sick days under their contracts in CT.
    The man who plowed our snow for our office is a Stamford officer who lives in our town. Last winter, I asked him how he manages to be available to plow whenever it snows… he replied that he simply calls out sick
    This is dishonest and theft.
    We did not hire him for this year (not that we have needed plow service), instead gave the contract to the landscaper who cares for property from April to October.

    in reply to: Shame on EVERY Democrat – re Islamist-bigot Ilhan Omar #2163310
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @anonymous Jew
    I referenced racist/bigoted police in my posts, many are also fascist,

    The countries you list are Marxist/Leninist/Communist, not Socialist

    The following are some of the Socialist Countries that are multiparty, Some such as India enshrine Socialist principals in their constitutions.

    Algeria
    Portugal
    Bangladesh
    Guinea Bissau
    Guyana
    India
    Nepal
    Sri Lanka
    Many of these governments have operated under Socialism for more than 45 years.

    I am not advocating Socialism, but stated I support some Socialist programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, Section 8 Housing assistance, free public education.

    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    In the early 29th century it would be said that the two of you are ‘keeping company’

    The term companion is applicable to both of you

    in reply to: Shame on EVERY Democrat – re Islamist-bigot Ilhan Omar #2163047
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @squareroot
    I suggest you start your comment with the word ‘some’
    Not all Democrats have done these things.

    I take issue with some of the categories you post as wicked and stupid, in fact the category is stupid:

    Muslims over Americans….you are a bigot! Just as there are Jewish Americans, Christian Americans, etc. there are Muslim Americans so this is utter nonsense.

    Choosing criminals over police….many police are I. Fact criminals as well as racist bigots. Don’t get caught driving while Black from the city directly south into my small town. Three squad cars will pull you over or follow you till you leave town. The department was sanction by the state for racial profiling.

    Israel’s enemies over Israel. While you and I may support Israel and like our government to do so, no American of any party has that obligation. Some want nothing to do with foreign affairs.

    Socialism over Democracy. These are not mutually exclusive terms. Although I am well off financially I support many social programs such as Medicare. Free public schools, libraries, parks and roads. BTW, there are no toll roads in CT.

    Illegal aliens over citizens My zaidy Z”L forged many support papers to bring Jewish refugees from Europe into the USA illegally in the 1930s and gave them jobs (there was a depression going on) and housing ahead of native born goyim who were US citizens. Only sorry he could only save hundreds not thousands.

    Atheism over All-mighty G-d. America guarantees the right to believe or not believe. You already picked o. Muslims who believe in an All-Mighty G-d
    Who are you to judge?

    I don’t paint with an all encompassing brush as you do

    in reply to: How to Reduce the Cost of Getting Married #2162713
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Getting back to the OP’s post about reducing the cost of getting married by eliminating the engagement ring.

    Over a number of generations and many decades of observation it is my observation that the woman’s family bears the brunt of the cost of the marriage. The chassun and or his family having to buy an engagement ring has little effect on the cost of getting married.

    My parents generation paid for their daughters’ weddings, I and my brothers paid for our daughters’ weddings. My sins have paid for the weddings of granddaughters who have reached that age. Yes, the boys’ side may have made a small contribution towards the total by paying for license, Ketubah, personal flowers and occasionally liquor or music; but the vast majority of the expense falls on the kallah’s family. I discussed this after minyan this morning. Of the 12 present, there have been 5 children or grandchildren married in the past 3 months in Brooklyn, Monsey and Lakewood. In each case the kallah’s family paid for more than 75% of the costs.
    The cost of an engagement ring not purchased would not reduce the expense to the kallah’s family, it might just lower total money spent, not up the contribution by the other side

Viewing 50 posts - 251 through 300 (of 3,279 total)