Ex-CTLawyer

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 151 through 200 (of 3,252 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Biden or Trump #2227640
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Dr P
    There have been many threads about ACA and I don’t think this thread should go off topic.

    When ACA came into being I bought through the CT exchange. Rates and rules differed by state so I cannot know how people in a particular state were affected.
    I was/am self employed and pre-ACA coverage was very expensive. We had been subject to preexisting conditions exclusions and $1,000,000 lifetime cap.
    In 2016 Mrs. CTL had $2,300,000 in covered medical expenses. A lifetime of savings and investment and our primary residence might have been gone if the $1,000,000 cap was still in place. If the preexisting conditions exclusions were in place from 2016 to her 65th birthday (Medicare eligible), we would have lost everything and all my earning would still be going to pay the bills (and we were never uninsured).

    in reply to: Biden or Trump #2227549
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @DrPepper
    I carefully read the OP and my initial response was win what? I presented certain things to be win and my predicted winner and why I predicted that person to win

    As for your question about paying for the insulin, it will be the drug companies’ shareholders in terms of reduced profits. The $35 month cap on cost brings the US price in line with what the same companies charge for the same drug sold in other countries,

    I don’t agree with you about the affordable care act (Romneycare you relabel as Obamacare) as it saved us an unbelievable amount of money over the years

    in reply to: Biden or Trump #2227470
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @anonymous
    Nowhere did I endorse or support any particular candidate. I President an analysis.
    President Biden would not be my first choice for President in 2024, but if we wants the nomination I believe he will get it. As I delegate I voted for his nomination at the 2020 convention. I have already stated I am giving up my seat in 2024 to a younger person and would like the President to do a similar thing.

    in reply to: Biden or Trump #2227469
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @DrPepper
    Regarding your final paragraph saying I did not respond to OP question about liberals not pointing out positive things accomplished by President Biden (and Why).

    That is not in the OP’s post.

    I did not make an endorsement of any candidate, I gave an analysis.

    BTW> a cap on Insulin of $35 per month is a major accomplishment (Mrs. CTL died of Chronic Kidney disease. B”H we could afford the cost, but n my shy couldn’t).

    in reply to: Biden or Trump #2227467
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Chaim87

    This post is asking for predictions. I can say with certainty that this is my prediction under the parameters I set forth.

    I have been involved in Democratic Party politics for a lifetime. I attended my first National convention 55 years ago in Chicago.

    Many in the CR may not agree with my political views, but many will vouch for my insight, history and analysis of the political situation.
    I have never attempted to change anyone’s mind or ask tha they support a particular candidate.
    I am old school Social Liberal, Fiscal Conservative, non-radical

    in reply to: Biden or Trump #2227110
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Win what?
    The Party Nomination
    Biden, if he wants another term
    Trump, because the other R are spineless

    Trials?
    Prosecutors win
    Trump lose

    Election in Nov. 2024
    The Democratic nominee

    BTW, for the first time in 32 years CTL will not be a delegate to the Democratic National Convention. Giving up my seat to a younger delegate

    in reply to: Dear Future Mothers In Law #2226672
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    I applaud the OP for his frankness. Yes there is a stigma against divorce, but it should not be applied to the children of parents who divorce, they were not one of the parties who could not continue in an untenable marriage.

    I practice family law and have handled divorces for many decades. Children of divorce often turn out much better than children whose parents remained in a bad marriage.

    Readers of the CR are aware that Mrs. CTL died over a year ago. I now am considering who I might spend the rest of my life with. Originally, I thought I would be amenable to a widow between the ages of X and Y. I immediately realized I was using some of these same prejudices against divorce. I am not a kohen and have no galactic restriction. I revised my search to include divorced women.

    It is hard to undo centuries of bias against divorce, but HaShem gave the laws of Gittin in Torah shel Beal peg for a good reason.

    in reply to: Frum daytraders #2225699
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Yeserbius
    You are absolutely CORRECT.
    The time for individual day trading is long gone.
    The computer initiated trades move the market.

    Our Trust administration department handles more than $75million for clients. From 1995 to 2003 we had two full time day traders providing great returns. Then the dynamics changed and we could not realize those gains and had to change the investment strategy

    in reply to: kolel for everyone #2224016
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @AAQ
    Sorry, but your suggest of 3-4 hours of work plus food stamps allowing the learner to support his family at any level is nonsense!
    As soon as the learner is accepting Foos Stamps he is not supporting his family, all the American Taxpayers are supporting his family.

    in reply to: ENGLISH SHOULD BE OPTIONARY #2223646
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @FollowMesorah
    Yes there are many attorneys not making a good living. Bread and butter income items such as wills have been replaced by on line forms. TurboTax and similar software has decimated the accounting profession.

    Typical sold practioners starting out today will not make a great living. Frum attorneys can not easily put I. The 2000+ billable hours a year required of associates in top legal firms and can’t wine and fine clients having little hope of making partner.

    Lastly it takes deep pockets to finance and build a personal injury practice. Years to trial and settlement while the attorney lays out all expenses for investigators, tests, depositions, filings and sometimes medical expenses. The collecting of a fee i(not recouping expenses) is generally contingent on winning, The CTL firm
    Has never handled a PI or medical malpractice case for these reasons.

    My
    bread and butter for decades has been trust administration (I get a percentage of annual income realized by the trusts and mange close to $100million in principal), family law/divorce/adoptions which get a healthy retainer up front, and intellectual property law representing big firms.
    Three of my adult children in the firm practice criminal law in NY and MA. An attorney takes the full expected fee up front from the Dede before taking the case.
    Lastly, real estate law. We do commercial real estate mostly, but when MIL was alive and active as a real estate broker we did all the closings for her office at fees of 1% of sales price. Today, discount lawyers advertise $300 closings. They don’t make a living and the client gets what they pay for.
    The exception is our Massachusetts office, as in Massachusetts every lawyer passing the bar exam is granted a real estate license. This duality can make a huge difference in income potential of a lawyer starting out.
    I would not be recommending my profession to
    Most young frum people unless:
    They are going to a top tier law school
    They have entree to an established firm with a guaranteed livable income.
    I expect grandchildren to enter the CTL firm in the next five years, but our hard work has made provision for their success.

    There are 7 attorneys in my daily minyan. I am the only one with children who are in the business. Most of the others have adult children in the medical field. Of the other 5, 4 are sole practitioners who experienced a good living but didn’t build a firm that could support additional partner level attorneys. The other is a top notch ligigator who is hired by top firms in CT and NY to represent civil clients in court.

    For all of us who are seniors and made a good living there are hundreds who hung their shingle and lived in near poverty or left the practice of law after less than 10 years because they could not adequately support their families.

    in reply to: kolel for everyone #2223545
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @aAQ
    Working 3-4 hours a day plus food stamps

    So the general population should support/feed him and his family?
    In many places those in school/learning would be ruled ineligible for assistance.
    It is called ‘poor by choice’ able bodied adults are expected to get a paying job

    BTW: the Republican Party who do many in the CR hold dearly would do away with this benefit or make Mr. Kollel work 20-40 hours each week to qualify for assistance.

    in reply to: ENGLISH SHOULD BE OPTIONARY #2223175
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @FollowMesorah
    My reply was to the suggestion of skills to be learned working as a secretary and then achieving a 6 figure income. It was not a reply to entry level jobs.

    I may have gone to an Ivy League U some 50 years ago and have completed 3 additional degrees since (MBA, JD and DBA) the last of which was conferred 19 years ago, BUT I teach law as an adjunct in a law school, American History in a State U and this semester AP Government in a public high school.
    I am aware of the changes and 1990s, 2000s and early 2010s saw great moves to the left, since 2015 there are many colleges and universities that have jettisoned the left and are far to the right. I don’t agree with extremism in education.
    In terms of public policy I am socially Liberal and Fiscally Conservative.

    in reply to: ENGLISH SHOULD BE OPTIONARY #2222857
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @EEEE
    Secretary job? Not in today’s world. Employees are expected to be proficient on a keyboard and do their own typing/filing.
    The CTL Law firm has offices in three states and we don’t employ a single secretary.
    I’m the principal and have never had a secretary. I do have a paralegal who does some research and court filings, but that is a position that requires specific education and licensing in many states.
    I also have an administrative assistant who answers and screens my calls, greets clients coming in to see me, settled them into the correct conference room or my office and might even bring coffee or water. In between she handles our banking and insurance.

    I know almost no professionals who have secretaries anymore. Occasionally, there will be a clerical worker who does some typing, billing, copying and filing, but that position does not have the skills and smarts a legal of medical secretary would have had 40+ years ago

    in reply to: ENGLISH SHOULD BE OPTIONARY #2222346
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @EEEE
    Giving an unqualified and/or inexperienced instructor a teacher’s guide is not the solution. Just being able to stay 3 pages ahead of the class does not make one able to teach and explain the course material.

    I cannot give an accurate description of what I found lacking without access to the entire course.
    What I saw wasted time’s irrelevant items in today’s world and did not address others.

    in reply to: ENGLISH SHOULD BE OPTIONARY #2221405
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @AmilZola
    I cringed when I read about dissecting sentences. This is not biology class.
    Seems they needed a year with Warriner’s English Grammar and Composition as I had in 7th grade in a Chassidische day school

    in reply to: ENGLISH SHOULD BE OPTIONARY #2221404
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @EEEE
    I examined the available sample pages of Lifeprep concerning Financial Literacy and find them better than nothing, but not much.
    The quality of the teacher is key to this having practical value. As an on line self study course it is sorely lacking

    in reply to: ENGLISH SHOULD BE OPTIONARY #2220965
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Daniela
    Yes, much of what you mention is covered in my course, however it is designed to work in a class of at least 12 students.
    Without giving away too much, each student reaches into the hat and draws a pre assigned persona. This gives age, gender, marital status, dependents, education, renter, owner, live with family, profession, wages, etc.
    We explore the banking system, loans, mortgages, all types of banking and investment accounts, leasing a dwelling, buying a dwelling, application process, credit ratings abc reports, credit cards, consumet protection laws, taxes, retirement income, etc.
    Without a mix of statuses and class participation the course does not function. It is not suitable for homeschooling with few students.

    in reply to: Rabbi Pruzansky and the Israeli Army #2220568
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @smerel
    No the average person going to a ‘reform’ synagogue is not looking for Torah. They are looking for a sense of ethnic/cultural community and socialization

    in reply to: ENGLISH SHOULD BE OPTIONARY #2220364
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Daniela
    My Personal Finance Course, written for high school students, is not an on line course.
    As it is licensed to schools at a per pupil charge I regret that I cannot provide it to you, nor an on line link.
    One warning, avoid the Prager U on line course that is out there. It is not very good and full of political bias.

    BTW, my course was written specifically for Connecticut anc deals with its tax laws and wages.

    in reply to: ENGLISH SHOULD BE OPTIONARY #2219909
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @PineLakePark
    Here in Connecticut the law requires every high school student to have a full semester course in Personal Finance.
    Not only have I taught the course, but wrote a curriculum which I have licensed to several towns as well as private schools and a Yeshiva High School.

    in reply to: Shidduchim Between Litvish Girls and Chasidish Boys #2218645
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @147
    Most women wouldn’t know if their husbands were putting Tephillin on Chol HaMoed, they aren’t at minyan with them.
    In more than 4 decades of marriage the late Mrs. CTL A”H never once saw me daven shacharis on Chol HaMoed

    in reply to: False Claim about Jewish History #2218423
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Why bother refuting Neturei Karta, ignore them. They are a meaningless group not worthy of our time

    in reply to: Pew Research Study of American Jews, 2021 #2212525
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @SACTS
    There is no congregational push about politics and voting.
    I know the political affiliation 2 ways:
    #1 chit chat
    #2 I have been Asst. Registrar of Voters in my town for more than a decade and am very familiar with the voter registration lists.

    in reply to: Pew Research Study of American Jews, 2021 #2212445
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @n0mesorah

    Nowhere did I state people switched their preference to the Democrats. I stated that many who were supportive of Trump no longer are.
    I am the lone D in my daily minyan. The rest all voted for Trump in 2020. Many have said they didn’t not support his effort to be elected in 2024. Many feel his actions in trying to overturn the Georgia results and January 6 warrant prison time. They all reman Rs.

    in reply to: Pew Research Study of American Jews, 2021 #2212405
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @ujm

    Please change the word are to were in your post. The PEW poll was back in 2021.
    Many people who may have been very supportive of former President Trump no longer are.

    Says a Democrat whose politics you may disapprove but a person of whom you don’t disapprove. That is a very important difference.
    I feel that way about you

    in reply to: Pew Research Study of American Jews, 2021 #2212359
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @MenachemSchmei
    Re: what makes them orthodox(they are not observant)?

    For most of the 20th century Jews in America self identified or were counted based on the ‘denomination’ of the synagogue the grew up in or (still) belonged to.
    Many members worked on Shabbos, ate treif, and didn’t perform most Mitzvah. But, they showed up on the Yomin Noraim, perhaps parking a block from shul and their dues kept the congregation functioning. By the 1990s many ‘orthodox’ synagogues had majority of members living in the suburbs and not frum. The shul functioned with the remnant of the members who remained in the old neighborhoods. Other synagogues moved to the right and Euro-traditional Jews no longer felt comfortable and if not needing cemetery privileges (a very OOT system) stopped paying dues. But if they didn’t join a non-orthodox synagogue they would self-identify as orthodox.
    The 21st century is a whole new ball game in terms of self identification. So many synagogues have folded. Here in CT I know of 8 orthodox synagogues that were founded between 1882 and 1920 that could no longer function. The buildings were taken over by Chabad(torahs and all) and while the liturgy and ritual may be orthodox, the assorted people who show up to Shabbos Services at 10 am are not what you or I would consider orthodox. No daily minyan exists, but those people who frequent the establishments will label themselves orthodox if asked.

    in reply to: The democrats he who must not be named #2211204
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Coffee Addict
    My extremely low opinion of Trump was formed long before he entered politics. I admit to a prejudice…My bias is based on actual business experience from when he beat my elder brother’s company for more than $300K on a telephone system installation for one of his operations in NJ.
    I know him to be dishonest. I have no respect for the thrice divorced, serial aldulterer…period.

    BUT, I await trials and conviction, he has been indicted.

    Lastly and most importantly…Hunter Biden should face the music for his own doings. He was never elected to public office and there is no public expectation of ethical performance of the duties of any such office. We don’t visit the sins of the children upon the fathers, rather we visit them upon the sons up to the third and fourth generation as it says in today’s aliyah (revii) of this week’s parsha Ve’etchanan (Yes I know Hashem was talking about prostration and worshiping other g0ds, in these cases that other deity is money and power and goyim are not bound by the commandments, But Jared might be along with Trump’s grandchildren though Ivanka<should her conversion be valid>).

    in reply to: The democrats he who must not be named #2211158
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @anon
    Unless the statement you claim are false were made under oath, they are hearsay and inadmissible in court proceedings. All politicians, salespeople etc. make statements that have varying degrees of veracity (from 0-100%) known as puffing. These are not expressed or implied wannanties that may be relied upon and do not bind the speaker

    in reply to: The democrats he who must not be named #2211149
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Neville
    I never would have called for beheading Trump. I oppose capital punishment.
    I have at times called for his trial and conviction. Now that there are indictments, I await his trial(s) and if proven guilty his conviction(s).

    After President Biden is no longer in office and Presidential immunity ceases, should he be indicted for specific crimes I would also expect a trial and if found guilty conviction.

    in reply to: The democrats he who must not be named #2211029
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @AAQ
    It is not possible to follow this situation closely as all we have is conjecture by partisan commentators.

    Facts, tapes, sworn testimony, not hearsay, is needed to make an informed opinion. It need not be in an impeachment, it could come out in a trial of someone else

    in reply to: The democrats he who must not be named #2210732
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @coffee
    So big deal, Hunter phoned the VP for help with a business deal.
    It will be a big deal if:
    The VP actually rendered the assistance and if doing so broke some laws or regulations or code of ethics.

    As for Cohen and Avenatti they are typical of those Trump chose to associate with including the knofkah he is currently married to….lowlifes associate with lowlifes. Those with integrity avoid them.

    ……………………
    Nothing in my comments should be construed as an endorsement of President Biden or excusing any behavior as VP that can be proven to have crossed the line. My standards don’t change according to party affiliation

    in reply to: Chris Christie – why can’t Jews rally around him? #2210671
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @2Cents
    The ban was from the list of candidates who might possibly receive our votes in the future.
    If he knocked on our door, I would invite him him, offer light refreshment and hear what he wanted to say. He seems to be an affable chap and if he traveled all the way to see me, I would not turn him away

    in reply to: Chris Christie – why can’t Jews rally around him? #2210626
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    During Christie’s first term as Governor Mrs. CTL (A”H) was very impressed with him and spoke with me saying that if he ran for President we should consider supporting him. Unlike me, she was registered unaffiliated.
    That ended with Bridgegate when he showed his true colors. Then the support of Trump and Beachgate made him forever banned in our home.

    The days of a sane or with reason Republican are gone. None of the current candidates could get my vote

    in reply to: Tort Reform #2210363
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Commonsaychel

    No, it is rare in NY and NJ, but in CT we don’t elect trial and appellate level judges (only probate). Thus, judges don’t have to raise election funds or garner votes or seek endorsements and are far mor free to admonish attorneys and refer to the bar disciplinary committee.
    I never held a NJ license, and while I hold NY along with CT, MA and FL it is my plan to surrender NY and MA December 31 as my 70th birthday approaches and stop paying license fees, insurance and Bar Dues in those states. It’s years since I’ve needed the licenses. Now I just have my licensed adult children or their spouses handle things in those states.

    in reply to: Tort Reform #2210361
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @HaLeivi
    I am proud of protecting the school system and taxpayers from paying out on this frivolous lawsuit. I did not label it baseless and frivolous, the judge did in ruling against the plaintiff and admonishing her lawyer,

    in reply to: Tort Reform #2210289
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @commonsaychel
    Sanctions by the State Bar happen much more frequently than you think (in some states). The plaintiff’s attorney will not be fined or suspended, but probably ordered to take a class on current ADA regs and reasonable accommodations.
    BTW: he had never visited the school and viewed the suspect fountain, just sent a investigator out to measure its height, when picture of cups/holder presented at trial, his jaw dropped and his face turned red in embarrassment

    in reply to: Tort Reform #2210127
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @HaLeiVie
    Why shouldn’t the plaintiff who filed a baseless and frivolous lawsuit (having suffered no injury) be forced to pay half defendant’s legal fees? Why should the taxpayers foot the bill?
    In this case the plaintiff’s attorney who brought the case is awaiting disciplinary action by the State Bar.

    in reply to: Tort Reform #2209999
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @UJM
    You of course realize that I was not disagreeing with your desire, but explains why it won’t happen anytime soon.
    The CTL firm doesn’t do Personal Injury, Medical Malpractice or most of those things whose awards you find offensive. We have done some pro-bono civil rights and ADA litigation, but only seeking changes in procedures, coverage of reasonable expenses and attorneys’ fees as 1/3 our usual billing rates and an award in damages to the client in the amount of $1.
    I taught an AP Government class in a local public high school this past semester. A visiting parent in a wheelchair made a stink about not being abl to access the water fountain and was demanding the installation of lower fountains and $100,000 damages. I defended the school district. When I cross examined the plaintiff I took out a photo of the cup holder in the side of the fountain and the protruding paper cone cups. I asked by that didn’t satisfy the plaintiff. She replied she shouldn’t have to be different than anyone else. I said you are different than everyone else in this courtroom, you are the only one in a wheelchair but still got your day in court. The judge ruled the paper cups were a reasonable accommodation and ruled for the school district and awarded the school district attorneys fees of 50% of billing.

    in reply to: Tort Reform #2209959
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @UJM
    This be politically involved lawyer (who has never taken a plaintiff in any of the types of tort actions you post) can tell you with certainty that state legislatures and Congress that have lawyer majority memberships will not pass meaningful tort reform.
    They will not vote to cut their incomes or the incomes of their contributors.

    in reply to: Outrageous auto insurance premiums #2209304
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    My GEICO policy renewed June 18th. It went up a total of $46 on two vehicles.
    Then again, I live in a small CT town and both cars are garaged. The increase was less than the rate of inflation

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2208374
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @ujm
    With the exception of the post put up for me last Elul when Mrs. CTL was niftara no one in the family or the firm knows that I post on the CR or my user name. I trust completely that the poster of that notification can keep the confidence.

    As the expression says since last Elul this has been a schartz yahr for CTL. First Mrs. CTL passed, I had hand surgery in one hand before Chanukah, discovered a cancerous tumor Purim time which required surgery during Pesach. Now awaiting surgery on my other hand (which accounts for many typos).
    B”H I feel fine and can keep a full schedule, these are merely bumps in the road of life to be negotiated.

    Also, I always own my errors and mistakes, no man is perfect.

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2208269
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Neville
    You are correct in stating I never said to look down at other groups and their minhagim. I was quite explicit in my objective to the system of Chassidic Courts and Dynasties, not the individual adherents to a Chassidus.
    I also stated that OOT we support all Jewish groups, institutions, etc. I am typing this after just having checked my on line banking. I saw a check had cleared my account for $180. I clicked on the entry and saw it was contribution to Colel Chabad in response to their Shavous mailing. I don’t say, just because I disagree with the Dynastic system, I won’t support charitable requests.

    Currently, in addition to my normal learning sdarim I am learning the Mishnah Torah on the 3 chapters a day cycle set up by Chabad. There is nothing to oppose in that endeavor.

    We are in the midst of summer vacation periods before the 9 days. My minyan chat saw that we are short for tonight. I had no qualms about calling local Chabad to ensure a tenth, just as I went earlier in the month when a minyan was needed at Chabad for a yahrzeit.
    Philosophical differences can be put aside for the greater good

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2208198
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @UJM
    George Eastman didn’t start Eastman Kodak until 1892. That’s 59 years after spread of modern photography.
    Think Mathew Brady photographing the acivil Ear in the 1869s or Queen Victoria and Prince Albert being photographed in the 1840s.

    Edited

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2208170
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Sorry for all the typos in my last comment

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2208071
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @AvraminMD

    As I mentioned in a comment, I had never seen or heard the term SNAG until reading it in this thread. It is not a derogatory term uttered aloud in the OOT communities I’ve lived in. In about 7 decades of life Misnagid has only been used as self description and see when reading Jewish history.
    Never has local Chabad used the term aloud I. My presence.
    As I have repeatedly commented: in small OOT communities all types of Jews support all Jewish institutions. Since the Chabad Day School is majority funded by both Litvish and non-orthodox Jews, the local Chabad would not public use those terms about their donors.
    The true infighting that I see, hear abc read about is I. The major Jewish communities and EY

    I grew up in New Haven. I think we belonged to (and paid dues each year) to 4 shuls. I left for another CT Town 35 years ago , but still belong and pay dues to 2 of those that are still operational.
    My big city Jewish friends did/do not understand the obligation small town Jews take upon themselves to make sure all Jewish communal organizations can survive and fund them.
    Federation makes Chabad, Litvish and Solomon Schecter schools all constituent agencies and allocated funding. Thus wealthy Reform Hews knowingly fund Orthodox education through Federation donations as well as responding to individual fundraising.
    As I said we self identified as Misnagid, but that doesn’t mean that there isn’t a bronze plaque with our family name on a classroom at THS Chabad Day School. I also spent two years as President of a shul which because of mergers davened Nusach Ari using Tehillay HaShem sidfurim

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2207598
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Neville
    I would never take anything you contribute as mean spirited.
    As for people who describe themselves according to a makloches that occurred centuries ago, instead of Jews look at the Anglican (Church of England) Christians.
    Henry wanted another Divorce, the Pope said no. Presto a new denomination with the head of the church, the head of the ruling dynasty. I have already stated my opposition to dynasties

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2207597
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Rso
    I must live a really sheltered OOT life. Until this thread I never came across the term: SNAG
    OOT all Jews must live in harmony

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2207596
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Yeserbius
    My paternal side is Litvak, my mother’s Yekke, arriving in the USA back in 1868.
    Oma never accepted my mother marrying a peasant from the east(with a college degree and a family that arrived in 1872).
    There were strict negotiations before the wedding 80 years ago. OPA insisted that the male offspring would wear taleisim from Bar Mitzvah and the ‘gutter’ language Yiddish not be uttered in his presence

    in reply to: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher #2207530
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Neville
    I guess I am a nobody by your logic…..
    A multigenerational Litvish Jewish American, I was brought up to proudly use the term Misnagid when describing myself. In fact you will see me use it in some comments I have posted in the CR over the years.
    My familial and personal opposition to Chasidus is not to its individual adherents but the practice of establishing a ‘court’ ruled by a dynasty. Just being the son or son-in-law of a leader does not make one a Talmud Chochem or a leader or anyway qualified to take over control of Millions of dollars of assets and direct the votes of followers.
    I particularly object to a Chasidus where a Rebbe dies and multiple sons take the title of the XXXXer Rebbe followed by a geographic location such as Boro Park, Monsey, Yerushalayim, etc. In affect setting up Cadet branches of these non-Royal Dynasties.

    AND>>>>>>I may oppose (be Neged) the Chasidus for the above reasons, but still support their Yeshivos, Hospitals, Kollelim, Bikur Cholim, Food Distributions for the poor because They are Jews and I support all Jews to the best of my financial ability. I also have cordial social interactions with members of Chabad, Satmar, Ger, Sanz and Bobov.
    Here, OOT, when I was growing up the Day School choice in New Haven was Chabad. Otherwise it was public school or be shipped OOT. Never was any of the Melech HaMoshiach sentiment expressed, but The Rebbe was alive for many years after I was out of school.

    in reply to: Summer camps #2206785
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Coffee Addict
    The difference between boarding and lodging is that a boarder receives food as well as sleeping accommodations.

    Reminds me of a Fyvush Finkel Song
    Ikh Bin a “Boarder” bay Mayn Vayb

Viewing 50 posts - 151 through 200 (of 3,252 total)