Ex-CTLawyer

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 51 through 100 (of 3,252 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Post-debate fallout- question for Democratic voters #2296416
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @AAQ
    Black support is a real thing, it does not matter that Obama was half white and Harris half Indian.
    They sell in the urban ghettos and Black churches. I have seen the voters whipped up by the cleverly and the grassroots get out the vote effort.

    The descendants of slaves idea is one only considered by the elite, not the masses

    in reply to: Post-debate fallout- question for Democratic voters #2296414
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Coffee
    There is little or no support for Jeffries. In general members of the House are not nominated for President

    in reply to: 2024 predictions #2296143
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @CA
    Properties are in Trusts, haven’t been in personal name for decades

    @AAQ
    The CT Presidential Primary was in April
    The August Primary is for state offices

    in reply to: Post-debate fallout- question for Democratic voters #2296033
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @skripka

    Your named suggestions are interesting but create a huge problem for the Democrat Party (Disclosure: I have been a delegate to the national convention many times).

    The heiress apparent (whom I do not support) is Kamala Harris.
    The party cannot push her aside for a white male or female candidate without losing what is left of the Black support for the party. They would sit the election out and the candidate chosen would lose

    in reply to: 2024 predictions #2295728
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Gadolhadorah

    You are quite wrong about the mechanics.
    If a candidate releases delegates, they may vote for others at the convention.
    It is not Biden who has a place on the 50 state ballots, but the official nominee of the Democrat Party and that person is not chosen until the convention in August.

    In most states absentee ballots can be mailed 30 days before Election Day, not soon after the August Convention.

    Replacing a named candidate on the ballots after the convention can be tricky.

    FYI, I still hold my position as Asst. Registrar of Voters back in CT and have to keep up on the laws. I will be overseeing the August 13 primaries this year.

    in reply to: 2024 predictions #2295727
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @CoffeeAddict
    I have not yet changed my legal address. Still have a CT driver’s license, own property and pay taxes there.
    At this point I still get to CT several times each week

    in reply to: Antisemitism in naming hurricanes #2295189
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Reb Eliezer

    As my mother , the strict grammarian, A”L always said:
    Dogs get mad, people get angry.

    in reply to: 2024 predictions #2295187
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Coffee Addict

    Harris is far from a shoe in for the nomination should Biden release his delegates.
    I have already been contacted by operatives for four other contenders interested in the nomination seeking delegate votes and contributions.

    I had not planned to attend this year’s convention with Biden having the necessary delegates, but depending if and when he withdraws I may revoke my proxy and attend to vote and participate in the deal making.

    I was not and am not a Harris fan.

    in reply to: Legal / halachic advance directives in healthcare #2294334
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @UJM
    I was asked to comment on experience in the past when I was a lawyer in CT
    I am now an Ex-CT lawyer as I surrendered my license, but still licensed attorney in NY, MA and FL

    I just can’t legally identify as a lawyer in connection with the word Connecticut

    in reply to: Until we meet again with a new user name #2293793
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Personal preaching time:

    Take all opportunities to make the most of your time with family,
    As previously posted, I remarried about a month ago and moved to NY.
    On our first date, I was zoceh to meet my future MIL, unusual because I hadn’t met a date’s mother in half a century. We developed a close bond, visiting regularly until and after our chasunah. This fine lady in her late 90s marched my kallah down the aisle and danced at the wedding. We were away this week and Friday afternoon while getting on the plane received a notice of her passing. 3 hours with no phone service or internet (service on plane out of order) and no info. We arrived home two hours before Shabbos and a cousin had delivered food for us, knowing we would not honor invitations with had in place for Shabbos meals.
    The levayah is this morning. A wonderful, sweet, kind, loving Tzedekis will be sorely missed. But, I shall thank HaShem every day that this woman gave birth to, raised and provided me a perfect wife for my golden years.

    To protect privacy, I’ll not post the name of the Meis. May her neshoma have an Aliyah.

    in reply to: Legal / halachic advance directives in healthcare #2293356
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @AAQ
    Absolutely no difference based on insurance
    My mother was Title XIX Medicaid
    MIL was traditional Medicare
    Late wife a Medicare Advantage Plan through State Exchange

    Three different hospice companies providing care
    All at zero cost to patient providing a equipment and personnel
    …………
    Please look at ematai on line or Facebook
    ..
    a childhood friend is director of the accociation of Hospices of the USA and has been invaluable proving guidance and law over the years

    in reply to: Legal / halachic advance directives in healthcare #2292975
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @anon
    Different hospices, different rules.
    The hospice agency we used in CT for in home, provided all the equipment and found the click arms, billing health insurance.
    We hired no one and paid nothing out of pocket

    in reply to: Legal / halachic advance directives in healthcare #2292848
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @jdf007

    My experiences were at a Catholic hospital (hospital of choice where we lived in CT). No Jewish or government hospitals in the area and far better care than the university affiliated hospital.
    As a family law trust attorney I dealt with hospices and associated issues for decades and did not run into what you experienced.
    Certainly at the Catholic hospital every effort is made to keep the patient alive as long as possible.

    It is terrible to be put in the position to discontinue further medical procedures. It happened to me with the late Mrs. CTL. After coding three times in a few years, 140 surgeries, a dozen long term ICU stays in comas in life support, we were presented with one final medical procedure that could be attempted. Both the surgeon and nephrologist agreed with my observation that she could not survive the procedure. 100% medical opinion that she would die on the table in pain.
    Decision made to start hospice care in ICU, remove artificial life support and let her die with me and daughters in dignity. Small doses of morphine to handle pain (not hasten death), she passed in two hours with no further suffering.

    The medical establishment would have been happy to keep billing insurance for things that could not have saved her life. Hashem had a way of let us know her time on earth was up

    in reply to: Legal / halachic advance directives in healthcare #2291717
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @JDF007
    You got it all wrong.
    It doesn’t mean doctors don’t want to do anything. It doesn’t mean a move to another facility in many cases.
    It does not mean the patient is not fed.

    We had Hospice care at home for my late mother, and mother in-law.
    Their bodies were worn out and they could not have survived any more medical procedures. They were allowed to pass in dignity in familiar surroundings with family present.
    My MIL passed at 10 PM on the third day of hospice care. She actually had a light meal at 6 pm. She was given light doses of morphine to ease her pain.
    My mother’s body gave out at 98. Her cancer had eaten away her intestines and free gases were killing her. There was no additional procedure that could save her. We brought her home to die with hospice care. She fell into a deep sleep an Hour after the transfer and died two hours later.

    in reply to: Legal / halachic advance directives in healthcare #2291148
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Look for the group Ematai on line. They hold on line and in person events in assorted Frum communities dealing with these issues.

    Having run a family law and estate practice for decades, I found them to be an invaluable resource in this area.

    in reply to: Is a graduation ceremony avoda zara? #2290346
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    I skipped high school, undergrad, MBA and Law School graduations.
    Nothing more boring than to be in the heat in a polyester gown and mortarboard listening to endless speeches

    in reply to: Is the USA Democracy A Morally Just System #2290256
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Chaim87
    What was offensive about your June 6 reply was the false statement you made that I copy and paste ….,
    I am a septuagenarian who does not copy and paste. I choose my own words carefully.
    Anyone who has read my comments and/or posts the last 15 years can see that they are my own words.
    I also don’t call names when disagreeing with another viewpoint.

    That said, I oppose government censorship of the press. The First Amendment to the Constitution which protects us from a government sponsored religion also guarantees this freedom.
    I only believe in certain limitations as they apply to national security or protecting privacy ( such as not posting names of rape victims).

    Back in the day newspapers had political ideology and one bought and read the one you agreed with. Today you chose an online news source you identify with.
    I grew up in New Haven and the Jackson Family who owned and published the two local papers were staunch republicans. We didn’t read the editorial pages for this reason, but it was the only source of local news and advertising.
    Today almost every daily in CT is owned by Hearst and not worth reading, circulation is in the toilet tans I have no friends who buy the papers. I check obituaries free on line.

    It is not the job of government to protect us from populist/fascist candidates by censoring the press. That would make the government as evil as the candidate you want silenced.

    Yes, the masses may be taken in by the populist, but that freedom of expression and the vote is the spine of our country.

    in reply to: Is the USA Democracy A Morally Just System #2290173
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @2cents

    Prosecutors only need to win elections in some jurisdictions. In CT neither prosecutors or trial/appellate court judges are elected

    in reply to: Is the USA Democracy A Morally Just System #2290171
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Chaim87
    Re: your June 6th reply.

    I don’t like lies posted about me.
    You may not agree with my political views, I don’t care, BUT despite your lies, I have never copied and pasted liberal or any other arguments. My thoughts expressed are in my own words.
    I don’t drink Kool-Aid and I don’t hurl personal insults at others in the CR just because I don’t agree with them.

    in reply to: Is the USA Democracy A Morally Just System #2289797
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Chaim
    If people don’t buy the newspaper or watch the network, the business fails,
    Most US newspapers have folded in the past 30 years.

    When I was growing up we had 5 newspapers delivered daily and there were three tv networks with a 15 minute nightly new broadcast.
    Now news delivery is quite different.

    I never read a print newspaper as the news is state before it is delivered

    in reply to: Until we meet again with a new user name #2289580
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @AAQ
    Thank you for your kind words

    I spent a professional career making sure I was in compliance with a myriad of rules and regulations and would never deliberately or knowingly break the rules.
    To all but the moderators I am known by my user name. But over the years I have been contacted by a mod who knew my real identity and email for assistance with a legal and medical situation in CT.
    Thus, I cannot pretend a user name allows me to violate the rules. Besides the Bar rules there are HaShem’s rules. I do my best to not violate those

    in reply to: Is the USA Democracy A Morally Just System #2288959
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    The USA is NOT a Democracy, It is a Republic….big difference
    Democracy, one person, one vote
    Look at the US Senate: a Senator from Wyoming represents approx 290,000 people, one from California represents approx 19,600,000

    #2 Don’t confuse the Federal Judicial system and state systems. Trump was charged with 34 counts of violating NY State Law and prosecuted by the State. There are 50 states with different legal systems. It has nothing to do with the US system of Democracy. OJ and Cosby were tried for State crimes in Pennsylvania and California under their state legal systems,

    #3 Free Speech/Freedom of the Press…this applies to Government action. Permits to protest are a local government issue, except if the protest is to be held on Federal land.
    If you don’t like the lies told on a particular network, don’t watch. No viewers equals no revenue and they may go out of business, News organizations don’t have to prove truth of everything they report,
    Being Devil’s advocate, why should American newspapers be restricted in what they print because hostages from another country are being held? You talk about ‘OUR” hostages and that applies to our unique status as Jews, but not to the vast majority of Americans.

    #4 GUNS, I don;t think any private citizen in the US should have one, Proponents of the Second Amendment conveniently forget that it talks about a well organized militia, That means the national Guard. I have no objection to Guard members, law enforcement, Corrections offices having guns. I even would allow private ownership of long rifles and shotguns for hunting purposes in rural areas, but no semi-automatics or bumpstocks.

    For those that claim they enjoy target practice. I would allow ownership of guns that must be kept locked up at a licensed gun range and never allowed to leave the premises,

    #5 ELECTIONS
    see my first comments, get rid of the Electoral College that makes the value of the voter in Wyoming work XXX ties one in California, NY or Florida.
    Then: States, not the Federal Government decide who can run for office and who can vote. There is not a countrywide standard.
    In CT, which I just left after more than 70 years. Convicted felons lose their vote, BUT after completion of their sentence, probation, ordered restitution they can petition for restoration of voting rights. Once a registered voter they can run for office. This the CONVICTED Mayor of Bridgeport who served 9 years in FEDERAL prison for stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars from the city got his vote back and was returned to office three times.
    In some states, convicts can vote from prison, in others they never get their voting rights back.

    The Supreme Court ruled this year that Trump could not be kept off the Ballot in Colorado, despite states havings these rights. If Trump was not seeking a Federal position the decision might have been different.

    How to fix this? Constitutional Amendments, bt most fail. Remember the ERA failed to be ratified by the required number of states and women to not have equal rights across America. The ERA was enshrined into the MA, CT, NY and NJ constitutions decades ago,

    Disclosure: I have practiced law for decades, I teach Government and Law
    I don’t politic in the Coffee Room, but will explain the system and correct misstatements of fact and/or law.

    Our US system has flaws not envisaged in the late 1700s, but it is ne of the best systems in the world.

    in reply to: Dems vs Repubs on this site #2288563
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @coffeeaddit

    This Democrat never starts treads on political topics, whether or not based on current events. I only comment on threads.
    In most cases I may eplain the law or how the system works under the constitution but don’t politic for a candidate

    in reply to: Who influences your vote? #2288556
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    The Rav of any 501 (c)3 organization (Tax exempt in USA) had better not be making official endorsement of candidates or urging congregants to vote one way or the other from the pulpit in shul or school bulletins, etc. or risk the organization losing its tax free status.

    in reply to: Until we meet again with a new user name #2288455
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Akuperma
    @ ujm

    I have been able to edit my user name to Ex-CTLawyer, thank you for the suggestion (UJM). BTW, my Eid to sign the Ketubah was a Satmar friend from Brooklyn. My Kallah’s was a contemporary who went to RJJ on the lower east side.

    Akuperma, I am proud of my 70 years in CT. I have surrendered my CT license, thus calling myself a CT Lawyer violates the rules.
    My NY, FL and MA licenses remain active

    in reply to: 34 x GUILTY #2288281
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Chaim 87

    NOT my title, I am not the OP. I replied to a comment

    in reply to: 34 x GUILTY #2288280
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Always
    I was quite specific about the NY DA, etc.
    You conflate this with a story about Merrick Garland who is a Federal official.
    Trump was tried and convicted on state charges.
    Biden is Garland’s boss

    in reply to: 34 x GUILTY #2287390
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Akuperma
    #1 do I believe Trump is guilty of the NY charges? Yes
    Do I want him incarcerated? NO
    Ford did the right thing pardoning Nixon so the country could move forward.
    #2 you ascribe far to much power to Biden. He does not control the NY State Governor, the NY County DA or the judge. These are elected state positions, Biden has little influence in the state party.

    I am proud to live and practice law in a state that does not elect judges. These should not be political positions as subject to party influence and campaign donors

    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Lostspark
    CTLawyer has substantially removed himself from most of social media.
    Preoccupied with upcoming marriage and disposition of a lifetime of stuff in the compound before my relocation to NY.
    Effective this year, I no longer active in politics.
    There are more important things in my life at this time..

    That said, I will not vote for Trump but am not a Biden supporter this time around. Wish we had better choices this year.

    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @crazy
    Have to disagree with you about hidden not being Democrats or Republicans.
    Without party affiliation one loses a great deal of power. In most states primaries are not open to non-members of the party and you have no say in who is nominated to run for office.
    I have repeatedly stated that all politics is local. I have been a member of my town’s Democratic Town Committee for years. I have been an elected member of town government. That could not have happened if I was unaffiliated.
    I have been a delegate to the past twenty state conventions and 4 national party conventions. I have given up those seats and hope younger people get involved.

    I always vote candidate not party line, splitting my ballot.
    I will vote against a particular candidate for President this year, but don’t consider myself a supporter of the other.
    Unlike 2016 and 2020 I shall not contribute to a Presidential campaign fund

    in reply to: Trump Trial #3 – Criminal Trial for falsifying business records #2277820
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @drp
    Don’t reply, but don’t make false accusations.
    I did not call you a five year old, I said calling names like a five year old.
    My words are chosen carefully.
    No one (who you do not pay) owes you a direct answer to any question.
    I often spend time away from the coffee room and upon return may not visit previous threads.

    I don’t act as in 1944, a decade before my birth.
    I shall not vote for the serial adulterer, election denier, grifter under any circumstances. That does not mean I shall vote for anyone else. In November I shall decide.

    I disagree about white male evangelical Christians not being a threat to world Jewry. If they destroy American Jewry, then Israel has lost its biggest source of political and financial support.

    As for liberalism, most Jews in The US are not frum. Liberal action such as the Civil Rights Act and doing away with forced Christian prayer in public schools benefited Jews.
    I got an Ivy League and Law School education. My older brother was legally told that the Jew quota was closed when denied admission by Princeton.

    My younger brother didn’t have to leave the country for medical school as our uncle did.

    There is a difference between liberal and leftist.

    Despite it all, I wish you a zissen Pesach, Chag lasher v’sameach.

    in reply to: Trump Trial #3 – Criminal Trial for falsifying business records #2277506
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @drp
    Grow up and stop call names like a five year old.

    You may not like a liberal viewpoint but that does not make all who hold them loony libs.

    My political views are socially liberal and fiscally conservative.
    I vote the candidate and not a party line.
    I have voted R and D for President, Senator, Congressman. And local offices.
    As a long term member of my Democratic Town Committee, delegate to state and national Conventions; I am free to vote for any candidate I choose, but cannot make a public endorsement of a candidate running against my party’s nominee on state or local ballot.

    I voted against Trump and am glad I did. He represents the worst of male white Christian nationalism which endangers Jews in America.

    None of this has anything to do with his criminal trial. I had posted repeatedly that I don’t want him behind bars, citing Ford’s pardon of Nixon as the best for the country.
    Time to forget Trump and move forward

    in reply to: Trump Trial #3 – Criminal Trial for falsifying business records #2276998
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Akuperma

    Sorry, there would not be physical evidence of an assault.
    Assault is threat of imminent physical harm or danger. It is not the same as battery which is the unwanted of unlawful touching of another.
    Assault is the perception of the person sensing the attack.
    I I raise my arm in a fist and move towards you, it is assault, if I make contact with you it is battery. In most jurisdictions the crime charged is assault and battery.

    I am merely explaining the legal concept of the crime and in no way expressing an opinion on this particular trial.

    in reply to: Mordechai & Esther’s Graves #2274618
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @DaMoshe
    On Columbia Law Schools website the LLD does not exist.
    This does not mean that the University could not have issued an honorary degrees that cannot be earned I. Real life

    in reply to: Are we really in the 3rd Term of Obama #2274229
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @SACT5
    Sorry about stretching out population

    Have been a Lamont supporter/delegate from his initial decision to run statewide.
    A decent man, definitely not radical left.

    Lieberman abandoned his Democratic roots but didn’t have the guts to switch parties.

    edited That didn’t end a friendship.

    in reply to: Are we really in the 3rd Term of Obama #2273764
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @nish……
    I never mentioned Trump.
    I corrected square’s misstatement that these people were employed by President Obama when they were in fact government employees.

    in reply to: Are we really in the 3rd Term of Obama #2273682
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Squareroot
    quoting an article from Right wing Murdoch CT Post about internal CT Democratic Politics, what a joke.

    I am probably the best qualified in the CR ti speak to Lieberman/Lamont history.

    I knew Joe Lieberman very well for 55 years. I worked in his first campaign, a primary to unseat State Senator Edward Marcus in 1970, and many campaigns after that. I was a delegate at the National convention that nominated the Gore/Lieberman ticket.
    My friendship and support continued through the middle of his second term in the Senate. He may have been pro-Israel, but he ignored the needs and wishes of his constituents as he gained prominence in Washington.

    Current Governor Lamont was not backed by the party’s left fringe, but by middle of the road Old school Dems who had been abandoned by Lieberman moving to the right and becoming a awk on foreign policy. I was a delegate a the state convention that denied Lieberman the renomination. He was no longer the best man to represent the citizens of CT.

    He had enough name power to win the general election as an independent, Similar to Lowell Weicker’s run for Governor. Lieberman was not sent to the Senate to represent the Jewish people, the interests of Israel, etc. He was sent to represent the 5 million residents of CT.

    I knew both of Lieberman’s wives, all his children, his mother, sister and Hadassah’s parents. I attended his funeral (invited by his son Mathew). Just because his politics moved on the right and I didn’t support him in his third run for Senate, did not end a 55 year friendship.

    in reply to: Are we really in the 3rd Term of Obama #2273671
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Squareroot

    Spreading false information as usual.
    Not a single one of the high level officials in the Biden administration was EMPLOYED by President Obama. Those drawing paychecks were employed by the federal government.
    Get your facts straight

    in reply to: Mordechai & Esther’s Graves #2272333
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @damoshe

    There is no LLD in law, it is a JD (Juris Doctor) which I hold.
    Prior to 1961 most US law degrees were LLB

    American law is the only discipline where a masters degree LLM is higher than the doctorate JD.

    Rav Henkin’s other son:Dr. Hillel Henkin PHd was head of the Bureau of Jewish Education in New Haven when I was growing up. He wrote many of our textbooks, workbooks and the curriculum for all Hebrew schools in the community. Dr. Hillel’s wife went to Hunter College with my mother in the early 40s, and was my Hebrew /religion teacher for 5 years.

    in reply to: Who’s Worse: Democrats or Hamas? #2272337
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Coffee Addict
    I have a heart and a mind


    @ujm

    Please use the word some
    This registered Democrat does not support Hamas.

    in reply to: Should the President be Immune from Prosecution #2271299
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Chaim87

    Presidential immunity can/does only apply to Federal action. It has nothing to do with state actions such as brought in NY for violation of state not federal laws. By convention the clock stops on state and civil actions until the President is no longer in office.

    I don’t make rules, I offer personal opinion, such as prosecuting a violent crime such as murder by the President. During term of office the House can indict for high crimes and misdemeanors and the Senate conducts the trial.

    In Trump’s situation, he is fabricating the premise that Presidential immunity runs with his natural life instead of ending with term in office.

    BTW, the classified documents were removed from the White House while in office, it does not matter when they were discovered. Since impeachment can’t occur for someone not in office, only a federal prosecution can occur. Should he go to jail? no, fines and repay costs of retrieval and return of documents? yes…why should taxpayers bear the expense of his misdeeds?

    Regarding your comments about Albany and legislative pay:
    state legislators are supposed to be part-time citizen legislators and not depend on the pay for their entire livelihood. Here in CT the legislature passes a two year budget in the full session. In the short session year no new bills can be introduced from the floor, only committee chairs move necessary legislation to deal with societal change or emergency. Our legislators get 40k per year for this part time work

    in reply to: Should the President be Immune from Prosecution #2271143
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Chaim87

    My question about piety and petit was quite serious as I don’t believe in government prosecution based on religious beliefs.

    You misquote me saying I don’t want Trump convicted. I don’t want Trump jailed.
    When he was impeached by the House I wanted him convicted by the Senate (which did not happen) which would have forced him from office.

    I don’t believe a former President should be tried on federal charges for actions while in office (such as Jan 6) which are political in nature.
    That said a President who commits a violent crime such as murder should be subject to criminal prosecution and appropriate punishment.

    in reply to: Most Democrats are Against Israel #2270811
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Lakewhut

    I know thousands more Democrats than you do.
    I have been a registered D since 1972
    I CT state convention delegate for more than 35 years
    A delegate to 6 national conventions
    A Democratic Town Committee member for 40 years
    Elected government official

    Most Dems are not against Israel and don’t support or approve of the squad
    But not being against Israel does not mean one supports each and every decision of the Israeli Government.

    It is unrealistic to expect non Jewish Americans to put Israel ahead of US interests.

    In 1948 D President Truman recognized Israel
    In 1967 D President LBJ supported and supplied Israel in the 6 day war
    R President Nixon was a known Anti-Semite and of little help with YK War

    President Biden has supported Israel through all his decades in government.

    The Bushes and Trump sold out to the Saudis

    in reply to: Should the President be Immune from Prosecution #2270670
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @chaim87

    This thread is about Presidential immunity from prosecution. I will ignore your
    discussion of non-Presidents.

    piety???? did you man petit…means small, pronounced petty as in petit larceny
    felonies are not petit

    as much as I detest Trump, I would not want him imprisoned if convicted of a federal crime

    Gerald Ford did the right thing in pardoning Richard Nixon saving the country from turmoil.

    Trump”s NY convictions should not be shielded by Federal immunity, he committed state crimes and was
    fined, not ordered to jail
    I did not suffer millions in lost taxes and profits as governments and lenders did, but he did beat my brother for over 200k in unpaid invoices when filing bankruptcy for Atlantic City casinos

    please excuse my typos, broken right hand

    in reply to: Should the President be Immune from Prosecution #2270565
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @AAQ

    please don’t confuse being sued, a civil action (put on hold until Presidential term is over) with prosecution: a criminal charge brought by the government

    Trump was subject to criminal prosecution twice during his term, it’s called impeachment and he was not convicted

    Civil suits, such as the sex charges and defamation that he lost in NY had their statute of limitations clocks stopped until he was out of office

    ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
    The question the OP should have asked is whether former Presidents should be immune from prosecution?
    My answer is a resounding no

    in reply to: Trump throws Kurds and Ukrainians under the bus, will Israel be next? #2264951
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    Lotspark

    Pisher Kushner had zero power and less influence.

    Apparently you missed the YWN article announcing that Kushner would NOT be part of a second Trump Administration.

    I hope there is no second coming of Trump, but Jared will distance himself

    in reply to: Trump throws Kurds and Ukrainians under the bus, will Israel be next? #2264791
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @Yechiell

    I”H he won’t be President and not have to follow Putin’s instructions regarding Israel or anything else.

    in reply to: Who gains by flooding the US with millions of Illegals?? #2263170
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @DovidBT
    I know the Democrat Party does NOT have an organized effort to get non-citizens to vote.
    I have been a delegate to state and national party conventions for decades, sit on the rules committee, etc.

    This is not to say that individual members of any political party may go rogue and do things that are not sanctioned.

    Your comparison and derision of the President is laughable.
    You take a cheap shot at a person who was not the topic of discussion. You sound like an 8 year old calling the President a vegetable. He walks, talks and engages in sporting activities. Time for you to grow up.

    I did not support Mr. Biden in the primary process. I cast my ballot for him as a vote against Mr. Trump. I would do so again this November of faced with the same choice of candidates

    in reply to: Who gains by flooding the US with millions of Illegals?? #2262954
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @CoffeeAddict

    Your response is confused.
    #1 a city is a municipality, as are towns, villages and in Connecticut three Boros.
    #2 Cities cannot vote, people vote
    #3 Municipalities can determine subject to individual State laws and Constitution who may vote and requirements to serve on Municipal Commissions, Boards and Committees.
    a. I cited municipalities in CT as examples. Only registered voters may vote to elect people to municipal government. Many towns have a requirement that the Town budget be approved by a referendum, not the only the Town Council. Some towns open these budet votes to all taxpayers, not just registered voters of the town. For example: I own an industrial building in the town next to where I live and am registered to vote. I pay more than 100K in yearly property tax. I have a vested interest in that town’s budget. I am permitted as a taxpayer to vote in the Tax Referendum and have done so for 20 years.
    b. One must be a registered voter to be elected Mayor, First Selectman, Council Member, Board of Finance, Board of Education and many other municipal boards, committees and commissions. My town requires anyone appointed to a Town Committee, Board or Commission (I chair the Economic Development Commission) must be a registered voter and appointment approved by the Town Council. Our Charter sets limits on how many members from each party may serve on a commission to keep things balanced.
    c. Constituent Agencies such as the Board of Education can establish committees and set parameters for membership as long as in compliance with State law. I explained that the Schools Athletic Committee includes high school students too young to vote.
    d. Library Boards in Connecticut are actually State Chartered, not municipal (keeps local politicians from raiding library trust funds) and members need only be residents, not voters nor citizens.

    San Francisco dropped (In compliance with California law) a citizenship requirement for service on NON-legislative committees, authorities and Boards. These groups cannot make laws, levy taxes, etc.

    I would not be opposed to a non-citizen serving on my municipal Parks commission if he/she had a passion and some valuable contribution to make, The commission is an advisory group to the Parks and Recreation Department. It doesn’t determine budget or spending, hire or fire employees, stc.

    Hope this makes it clearer.
    The commission the non Citizen was appointed to in San Francisco does NOT make election law or determine who may vote. It helps select polling places, distributes voter education materials, helps spread the word that poll workers are needed, but does not hire or train them.

    in reply to: Who gains by flooding the US with millions of Illegals?? #2262874
    Ex-CTLawyer
    Participant

    @CoffeeAddict
    Time for a Constitutional Law lesson from this adjunct Law School Professor.

    The case you cite is about a municipal government.

    NOWHERE in the US Constitution are municipalities mentioned. The only DIVISIONS of Government are Federal and State. All rights not reserved to the Federal Government (Foreign relations, defense, issuing money, etc) are reserved to the States.

    Municipalities are created by STATES and subject to the laws, regulations and State Constitutions. Municipalities can be abolished or have their borders redrawn by the State. My town lost 49 acres to an adjoining municipality 12 years ago to build a new high school.

    State Constitutions and laws determine who may vote, the US Constitution only sets the minimum age (18).
    In a state there are requirements set: Felons may lose their right to vote.

    Local elections are tricky. I have to be a citizen legally registered to vote to vote in local elections to elect people to positions, but some towns that have budget referenda each year create voting folls for those elections open to all Taxpayers of the town.

    In 2020 San Francisco dropped its Citizenship requirement for appointment to all Boards, Commissions and Advisory committees. None of these are legislative organizations and can’t institute/raise taxes.

    My town’s charter restricts membership in these groups to electors (registered voters), but commissions, Boards and Advisory Committees of Constituent Agencies do not carry these rules. Thus The Student Athletics Advisory Committee of the Board of Education may have students appointed who are less than 18 years of age and not qualified electors.

    You read a sensationalist headline about San Francisco, but nothing they did contravenes the US Constitution or gives a non-citizen a vote in an election for office

Viewing 50 posts - 51 through 100 (of 3,252 total)