Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
CsarMember
Which “military” victory? We had a “military” in Shushan?
The Megilla states clearly that the date of Purim corresponds not to the day of the triumph but to the day the Jews rested from battle.
CsarMemberDo you date older women?
CsarMemberShe wanted to know if you were kidnapped.
CsarMemberPerhaps it recently switched from Kof-K to OU, hence the results you had on their respective websites.
CsarMemberWOI: Do you always use letzanus to knock the Torah?
CsarMemberAnother possibility is that they recently switched hechsheirim, and you got one package made under the old and one package made under the new.
CsarMemberAbsolutely, correct. I would add even Jews in EY shouldn’t in any way celebrate Yom Haatzshmut.
CsarMemberI have the flag flying in my room all year round.
CsarMemberDY: You missed the point entirely. You implied that KVH is unreliable on its own, by saying that some say Kellogg’s has been checked independently of the KVH. Yet, if it is unreliable and needs independent checking, what good is relying on purported independent checking, if you aren’t even certain that it is in fact independently checked!
CsarMemberPurim does not celebrate a military victory.
CsarMemberIt’s less an aveira to say it on the American Independence Day than the Zionist Independence Day.
CsarMemberyichusdik: Don’t be foolish. Perhaps murder isn’t so bad, since the death penalty is rarely applied due to a lack of two witnesses who gave advance warning and the perpertarator committed it in front of them post-warning. Right.
Mishkav zochor is in the same category as murder. Both are death penalty crimes.
If there were a Murderers Day Pride March or a Adulterers Day Pride March, apparently you’d support it the same as you support the feigelech. After all, you never witnessed the murder or adultery.
CsarMemberSome say Kellogg’s has been checked independently of the KVH.
What good is “some say”? If you aren’t certain of its reliability, then it cannot be consumed.
CsarMemberThe Chazon Ish pronounced that if drafting women was included, that we should resist even if it meant death:
?????? ??????? ??? ? ???? ? ????? ?????? ?? ???? ??????
?????? ????? ??? ????, ????? ?? ?? ????? ???? ??? ???????, ????? ????? ?? ??? ???? ?????? ???? ??? ???, ?????? ?????? ?????? ???? ???? ???? ?? ???? ??????, ????? ???? ???? ??? ????? ??? ?? ???? ???? ????? ?? ???? ?????? ???????, ?? ????? ???? ?? ??? ?????. ????? ???? ?? ????? ?”?????? ??????” (?”? ???? ??”? ???”?) ?????? ???? ????? ??? ??”? ????? ???? ????? ????? ????? ?? ???? ???? ???? ??? ????? ??? ?????. ????? ?? ????? ???”? ??? ????? ?? ?? ????? ??? ??? ????????? ??”?, ????? ??? ????? ????? ????? ?????? ????? ???? ?? ??? ???? ????, ???? ??? ???? ?????????, ????? ??? ???? ????”? ???????? ????? ?????? ??? ??? ???? ????, ??????? ???? ????? ??????
They left no doubt as to the cause for their opposition – the army in Israel is a place where moral standards are relaxed, to say the least, and it was just not the proper environment for a Jewish daughter. Against their will, the girls would be affected by the atmosphere and the environment to which they would be exposed, a milieu which would replace the positive reinforcement they would have gotten at home from parents and family.
Rabbis Isser Zalman Meltzer and Tzvi Pesach Frank also issued pronouncements that a person must choose death rather than accede to the government decree, as did the Steipler Rav and Rav Shach. When another rabbi suggested that perhaps it would not be so terrible if the girls served under carefully supervised conditions, the Chazon Ish retorted that the rabbi’s opinion was totally worthless and, had he had any children, he would not have been able to say something like that The Chazon Ish actually ruled that the Sabbath should be desecrated to avoid compliance with a draft order and urged parents and teachers to inculcate young women with the laws of dying “al kiddush Hashem;’ in sanctification of the Name.
CsarMemberThe reasoning of B&H to disallow purchasing on Shabbos, is tangentially related to the OP’s question.
CsarMemberWhat gives you the right to limit your backpack to under an arbitrary 20 lbs., at the cost of not bringing sufficient water to wash with?
CsarMemberB&H Photo disables purchasing on their website during Shabbos.
CsarMemberYou must use your water to wash for the bread. Otherwise, you cannot eat the bread.
CsarMemberIt used to always be that if you were logged into one, then you were logged into both. After they did some kind of site maintenance update, it broke it, and it doesn’t allow you be logged into both simultaneously.
CsarMemberIow, there is no standard. Do whatever you like.
CsarMemberHalachicly, if someone was pressured by the telemarketers persistence, and refusal to take no for an answer, to pledge an amount he didn’t want to, is obligated to fulfil it?
CsarMemberThem?
CsarMemberFeif: By definition, Kollel yungerleit are far more educated than almost everyone else.
CsarMemberYou refuse to judge Levi Aron until you reach his place?
CsarMemberRABBAIM makes a very good point.
Also, even if we don’t judge a person based on their frei siblings, we surely judge the sibling himself who discarded the Torah for their terrible actions.
June 25, 2012 2:16 am at 2:16 am in reply to: MUST READ- Real Solutions to the Internet Challenge #922629CsarMemberI was there. From beginning to end. In person. (And I saw the replay.) K’mat every single speaker said filters.
June 25, 2012 1:09 am at 1:09 am in reply to: MUST READ- Real Solutions to the Internet Challenge #922627CsarMemberAnd just for the record, At the asifa, they did NOT promote filters they promoted banning.
Absolutely wrong. Every fifth word at the asifa was “filters, filters, fiters”. From almost every speaker, the Litvish and the Chasidish.
CsarMemberIn either case, asking a shaila isn’t sufficient. The one who wishes to be compensated needs to bring the other party to Beis Din. Otherwise he can’t be forced to pay based upon a shaila alone.
CsarMemberThis is why one shouldn’t go to treif eating relatives (or anyone.) And especially with children.
CsarMemberThat’s why all this talk about those able to learn all day being an “exception to the rule” misses the point.
Not everyone will become Moshe Rabbeinu, to be sure, but everyone should try to come as close as they can. And everyone admits that being Moshe Rabbeinu is something to look up to, strive for, and admire. Even if most of us don’t ever make it there.
So too even if many people will not learn all day, we all must recognize that it is certainly a higher level, it is a prize and privilege and merit that we should all try to attain, since it provides us with a higher spiritual level, and reaching the highest level possible in this world is our goal.
Today, thank G-d we live in a society where many, many people can learn all day. They recognize, BH, that learning Torah is better for your soul than practicing law. Or accounting. Or writing software. No question about it.
The point is the values, not the behavior. Behavior represents Jews; the values represent Judaism. To say that not everyone will reach the high level of learning all day is acceptable. But to say that isn’t a higher level, is changing the Torah’s values. Talmud Torah Kneged Kulam. And that includes every second of learning.
CsarMemberThe workplace, even frum workplaces, is not a place for a good Jewish boy. We have to be there, granted; we have to make a living for our families – which is a Mitzvah in itself – but we need to realize the price we pay for those necessities.
There is a story in the mussar seforim, about a man who had a premonition that next year’s crops would be poisoned, so that whoever would eat it would become insane. He didn’t; know what to do — if he would eat the crops he’d become insane, but if he does not eat the crops, the whole world will be insane except him, and being the only normal one in an insane world is just as bad as being insane. Warning people about the crops is useless because nobody would believe him anyway. So he went ot the village wise man who told him, “You have to eat the crops. You’re right – that being the only normal person in an insane world is as bad as being insane. Plus it will drive you crazy anyway. But here’s what you do:
“Tie a string around your finger to remind yourself constantly that you have eaten from the crops and you are insane. Being insane is bad, but in this case you have no choice. However, for the rest of the world, much worse than being insane is the fact that they will think they’re normal. Being insane is bad, but being insane thinking you’re normal is much worse. So tie a string around your finger which will always remind you that you are insane. You’ll be insane, but at least you’ll know you’re insane. Everyone else will think they’re normal, so you’ll be much much better off than the rest.”
The nimshal is, there’s nothing wrong with going to work, and often it may even be a necessity. But to spend the gift of life that Hashem gives us for such a short time in this world selling cars or programming computers or whatever we need to do to make a living, is insane. It may be necessary, but it’s still insane. We have so little to live in this world (we should all live to 120 years, but compared to eternity in the afterlife, 120 years is nothing), and its our only chance to collect Torah and Mitzvos — how crazy is it to busy ourselves with other things??
But we have to? OK, we have to. At the very least, let us realize that we do so out of necessity and that making a living necessitates our leading a life which, when you consider what we’re on this world for and the opportunities that exist ONLY while we are here, is insane. Let’s at least realize that.
For those who learn all day, they may not need to tie strings around their fingers, but, unfortunately, in the materialistic and confused world that we live in, they need posts such as this one, to constantly remind them that their lives are very, very normal, sane, and healthy.
The hardships of Kolel are nothing compared to the pleasures. Like Rav Aharon ZT’L said – that those who support learning might get Olam Habah like those who learn, but they surely don’t get Olam Hazeh like them. Money isn’t everything – even in Olam Hazeh.
CsarMemberThe Sultan didn’t need to see his doctor for multiple hours every day.
CsarMemberSitting and learning all day is the ideal. “Talmud Torah Kneged Kulam.” Chazal say, one word of Torah is higher than an entire lifetime of doing these Mitzvos. Chazal often mention that Toroso Umnoso is the ideal, that we do nothing all day but learn. Nowadays poskim say that we cannot reach that level, but clearly the closer the better. Also, Shulchan Aruch Hilchos Talmud Torah, in the Shach, says that nowadays learning all day is the ideal, and that if someone has the ability to do it, he should. The Shach adds that regarding learning all day in general, nowadays we cannot reach our potential in learning the way the Rambam etc. did, since we are not on that level. Therefore, we should learn all day if we can.
The Rambam writes that a “working person” is someone who learns 8 hours a day and works 3. Not works 9am to 5pm.
CsarMemberHeheh. The problem with approving them not in chronological order is that readers often make a mental bookmark of where they are holding on a thread by the last post they read. So if you approve an earlier post later (or make a mod post without first approving the other, earlier, pending posts), people will often miss the older comments that were approved later since they thought they already read everything up to the last post they saw.
CsarMemberThe mods sometimes approve posts not in chronological order.
Also, mod 42 has a nasty habit of putting through his own posts without approving regular posters comments who posted earlier. 😉
CsarMemberA get is chayiv misa for any aveira?? Where’d you get that from, phrum? You must’ve meant a gentile is chayiv misa for any aveira (from the 7 he is obligated to.)
CsarMemberIQ is the most researched approach to intelligence and by far the most widely used in practical setting. One of the most notable proponents of the IQ is Linda S. Gottfredson, a scientist and educator who published a highly-regarded article in Scientific American. Gottfredson asserted that “Intelligence as measured by IQ tests is the single most effective predictor known of individual performance at school and on the job.”
Another leading figure in the study of intelligence, Dr. Arthur Jensen, Professor Emeritus of educational psychology at the University of California, Berkeley, has created a chart that spells out the practical implications of various IQ scores.
CsarMemberWithin human population, studies have been conducted to determine whether there is a relationship between brain size and a number of cognitive measures. Anthropologists and psychometricians found correlations, and modern studies began with Van Valen 1974, which suggested a correlation of 0.3. Jensen & Johnson’s 1994 “Race and sex differences in head size and IQ” wrote of the successive literature that:
“In all of the 25 independent studies we have found in the literature, nonzero positive correlations between head measurements and intelligence measurements have been found, all but five with correlations significant beyond the .05 confidence level. The average correlation between various external measures of head size and IQ is close to + .15. Two recent studies have measured brain size per se by means of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and found correlations with IQ in the .30 to .40 range (Andreasen et al., 1993; Willerman, Schultz, Rutledge, & Bigler, 1991).”
Nguyen & McDaniel’s 2000 meta-analysis found similarly, as did McDaniel’s 2005 “Big-brained people are smarter: A meta-analysis of the relationship between in vivo brain volume and intelligence”:
“…based on 37 samples across 1530 people, the population correlation was estimated at 0.33…For external head measures, Vernon et al. (2000) reported the population correlation between head size and intelligence to be 0.19. Nguyen and McDaniel (2000) reported population correlations from 0.17 to 0.26 for three different sub-categories of external head size measures.
CsarMemberSam: Why would you assume such a gentile receives olam habah?
CsarMemberThen again, historically people were converted before they even knew what most of the mitzvot were.
That may be, but they always had to have the full intention of accepting the yoke of following all 613 post-conversion, as they became familiarized with them. They could not decide pre-conversion that even one of the 613 was too hard and would not maintain it; otherwise the conversion would never have been effective (even with their going into the mikva and verbalizing any statements that they never intended to follow in practice.)
And a gentile is obligated to fully maintain all 7 noachide laws (at penalty of death.) Failure to keep even one of them (i.e. immorality, petty theft, idolatry, etc.) constitutes them forfeiting an afterlife.
An interesting question is whether a Gentile who routinely violated a Noachide Law, or even mistakenly violated such a law on one occasion, can repent from that sin and how he would have to go about repenting.
CsarMemberOOM: The idea that men’s physically larger brains may account for their greater average IQ is an idea cited as a possible explanation by the various academic researchers previously discussed.
The point of this discussion wasn’t to tie it in to Yiddishkeit but rather its scientific and academic discussion and research on the subject.
And the title’s capitalization was mod edited post-submission of the OP.
jbaldy: Do you have a better method of measuring intelligence? Or do you suppose intelligence cannot be comparatively measured today utilizing current tools?
CsarMemberIf a Ger reverts to stop practicing Judaism, it is probably a very good indication that he indeed regretted starting with Judaism.
CsarMemberGoq: What is wrong with getting gelilah?
CsarMemberThe OP made no assumption. Multiple studies were cited (in follow up comments) by various independent academic researchers in different parts of the globe and more can be produced upon demand. No one has thus far cited any opposing scientific research that reaches a different conclusion. A 5 point difference is indeed small but nevertheless significant, with an average IQ score being 100. Additionally, is there any research indicating IQ has any correlation to family, as your comment seems to imply?
June 19, 2012 1:55 pm at 1:55 pm in reply to: President Peres expresses absolute Kfira while representing Jews #880441CsarMemberyitzy: What you mentioned proves our Chachomim knew science better than the scientists.
CsarMemberUmbrellas.
CsarMemberIt is not okay.
CsarMemberMost mikvas are big enough that multiple people are in them simultaneously.
(The Ari’s mikvah in Tzfas isn’t, though.)
CsarMemberWouldn’t the 30 day return policy protect you if you make a purchase with them?
CsarMemberyitay: It isn’t relevant. An anecdotal comparison of mine to someone else here is inconsequential. And regardless, I’ll be charged with either hubris or deceit. Suffice to say, I’d be accepted by Mensa (if I cared to, which I don’t) in an instant.
Sam: It is true that at both ends of the extremes of the spectrum there is a widening gap between the genders. Nevertheless the point remains, as the mean male IQ is 5 points higher than the mean female IQ.
OOM: All studies conclude that males have a higher average IQ. It isn’t in dispute, as it well shouldn’t be. It is simply a compilation of testing results. The only differences between studies is a small difference of how much higher males score (though even on that point there isn’t significant deviation – some may have it at 4 IQ points) and what to attribute the reason for the difference to. The most common explanation I’ve seen to explain why men have a higher IQ, according to academic studies, is because men have a larger brain size (physically).
And this has held true for a century. They generally categorize the IQ difference between males and females as a small but significant difference. (And, no, the discussion here isn’t based on Yiddishkeit.)
P.S. While I may have capitalized this thread title, in the past I hadn’t but a mod edited to capitalize the first letter of each word. It happened a couple of times, so I got the point to save them the trouble (if I applied it here – I don’t recall). It seems to be site policy, albeit inconsistently applied. The New York Times does the same, generally.
-
AuthorPosts