Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
… A short while. After Shavuos, bli neder.
I can’t believe I didn’t get “than-x” until now. [facepalm]
The frum filmmaker is Rama Burshtein.
I thought something sounded familiar…
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/shmuel-kunda-songs
“It’s in the first volume of Michtav Me’Eliyahu.”
More precisely, it’s near the end of the first of the
three sections, in the piece titled “Emes v’Sheker.”
“There’s a halacha in the SH”A that a man is required to walk in the street with his head bent so low that he can see at the most, 4 amos in front of him.”
That’s not how I’d translate “lo yeileich b’komah z’kufah.”
There is an idea brought down, not necessarily in the Shulchan Aruch, not to look outside of one’s “daled amos,” but I’ve never heard that one’s posture should make it impossible to do so.
Which is what?
Was this originally a reference to “Dumbo?”
No. At least, I don’t think so.
I’m pretty sure the first one should be “would,”
and the second one does seem more of a tongue-twister
with “would” as well. (The version I’m familiar with
has “could” in the second place, i.e.,
“How much wood would a woodchuck chuck
if a woodchuck could chuck would?”
You do it in the page for editing your profile.
Click on your name at the top of the site where it says
“Welcome, [your name],” then on “edit this information.”
Or just follow this link (which will only work for you):
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/profile/nisht-gedaiget-yidden/edit
The password change fields are below the profile info fields.
Do you perhaps already have another account with that e-mail address? (Perhaps one of your children used it to create an account.)
In this scenario, whatever you just set
your password to is now your password.
Anyone hear of Yaakov Avinu having the power that whatever he said would be true? (This does not seem logically possible,
but someone once said something along those lines to me…)
It’s in the first volume of Michtav Me’Eliyahu. The concept is
that “emes” is not “truth,” but whatever furthers the Will of Hashem.
Thus, in a situation where it is proper to say an untruth, one is
still saying the “emes” (but not, of course, the “truth”).
Not all of them are necessarily Joseph, but they were thought to be.
Heh heh… 🙂
Oh, that finally brought you in here, eh?
The point was that no one who doesn’t know him personally should
be able to identify him. I do think his name is actually Binyomin,
though – if I remember correctly, he says something about not
using his last name.
^The chanukas habayis song from “Boruch Makes a Simcha.”
[Not meant for any specific poster]
The mods may have access to information that
could potentially tell them who you are.
(Just so you know.)
“I am merely proving that the Yetzer Hara does have a Yetzer Hara as evidenced from the fact that he desired Chava.”
Adam (presumably) desired Chava,
and he did not have a yetzer hara.
Animals desire other animals,
and they (I assume) don’t have a yetzer hara.
That drive is often referred to as “the yetzer,” as in the
phrase “m’gareh hayetzer,” but does that make it synonymous
with “the yetzer hara?”
(How does that Gemara about the destruction of the desire
for avoda zara go? Are there multiple “yetzer hara”s?)
Here’s a question for you, Joseph: Why?
Why do you do what you do/have done?
rephrased
Speaking as someone who likes music, I’m really not sure your
level of occupation with music is healthy, Cozimjewish.
Why on Earth would someone call me Pac-Man? And if they weren’t blocking him then, CA, why would he stop using those accounts?
If you want another answer, though, there may simply not
be an official Joseph-labeling method to be followed.
No, Shopping, you don’t need another e-mail account to make a new SN.
Dama was an adult at the time, and was presumably stronger than his mother. (He also wasn’t going to have to keep living with her…)
How old was the boy?
Bump.
*adhering
I think it was because they weren’t blocking him this time.
Also, as Writersoul pointed out (and I immediately
thought when I saw the title), it’s the 19th story,
and it is always referred to as such.
Why are there excerpts of p’sukei d’zimrah in the Haggadah?
Because we’re not all going to be in shul for it in the morning.
“I can’t tell you just now what the moral of that is, but I shall remember it in a bit.”
“Perhaps it hasn’t one,” Alice ventured to remark.
“Tut, tut, child!” said the Duchess. “Everything’s got a moral, if only you can find it.”
Hmm, there’s a lesson in all this.
Okay. Let’s hear it.
Never let sixty angry kids use a herd
of laser cows to take over your house.
(Rather than bump my thread again…)
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/bookworm-120-this-ones-for-you
Sorry about the space – it’s a typo.
It was probably removed by a mod.
How about a discussion of ideas for a CD to be created, not bought?