Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲Participant
That profile’s gotten more interesting since the last time I read it. 🙂
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲Participantyeshivishe kup – original: ??
Currently links to –
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/profile/yeshivishekup – but there’s nothing there, nor at that address with the space put in.
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲Participant?????
“Rabbit’s-foot” keychains.
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲Participant“What happened to the CR?” is probably a valid question once
every few months. There are constants, and some carryover from
one period to the next, but eventually the environment changes
enough that it sort of doesn’t quite feel the same. (Am I wrong?)
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantI only know Yisrael David Finkelstein.
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantI’m sure I’ve seen a thread about this
before, and probably not too long ago…
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantIt makes me uncomfortable talking to men if
I don’t even know if they are married or not.
But once you know it’s one or the other,
do you then become equally comfortable?
If not, which situation is more comfortable?
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantMe: In English, “tz” is sounded as tzaddi-sin, not tzaddi-shin.
Correction: It is, of course, sounded as tes-shin. (Also, how
they would read “tzitzis” would’ve been a better question.)
September 16, 2016 8:13 am at 8:13 am in reply to: "Up and back" – the same as "back and forth?" #1209331☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantMe: …it’s in the English version of Mishnas Rebbi Aharon.
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantYes, but CA wanted to use it for when you’ve done something wrong.
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantAnd who do you endorse in this year’s election, Mr. Jerusalem?
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantThat’s one of the funniest posts I’ve seen in a while.
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantSuperb. Utterly superb.
Why, thank you! 🙂
I understand now… (That’s what happens
when all you know is that it was his sled.)
#butnoonewasthere #messengerofevil
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲Participantthats the MAIN reason why im becoming a
pharmacist to find a cure for that sibling
I hope you are not setting yourself up for disappointment.
Have you discussed this with anyone? (Please don’t take
my personal pessimism too seriously, though.)
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantSo mechiras Yosef is justified, but Yaakov will be distressed to
hear of it, so misleading him is justified in order to spare him.
This doesn’t mean that if you do something actually wrong, it’s okay
to lie about it because hearing about it will distress the other person.
What do you say to that, Coffee Addict?
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantIn English, “tz” is sounded as tzaddi-sin, not tzaddi-shin.
(How would you and he spell “tzitzis?”)
What’s the reason to be nice only to older males?
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲Participantiacisrmma, I’m looking at you.
August 31, 2016 2:31 am at 2:31 am in reply to: Can you guess the outcome of this true story? #1174847☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantWhat actually happened was… B.
Both contestants chose Split (and both received half).
In an interview years later, Player 2 said he would never
have done anything but Take if not for Player 1’s tactic.
August 31, 2016 2:29 am at 2:29 am in reply to: Can you guess the outcome of this true story? #1174846☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantGoogle it. […] Golden Balls.
Why would you post the source?
Also, why would he ask the question if it’s obvious?
[…]
Mainly, I choose C because the answer is supposed to be surprising.
I didn’t say the answer was surprising. Considering the subject
matter, wouldn’t it be wise not to make any assumptions? 🙂
[E]ven if he is worried that guy2 will do take after all,
there still is no point in his doing take. If they both do take,
no one gets the money, so he may as well do split.
Therefore, the logical assumption is that guy1 will do split. If guy2 figured that out, he would do take, so he can get everything.
People who are less generous than you see a point in preventing the
other person from getting money when they don’t get any themselves.
The question a player must ask himself is “How likely is the other person
not to do what they say they will – what will they gain by not doing so?”
In this case, all Player 1 could gain by not doing what he said he would
(by splitting) was giving Player 2 all the money. Why would he do that?
It’s more believable that Player 1 would leave the decision to Player 2,
who could either Take for a mutual loss or Split for a possible gain.
The only reason for someone to be so adamant
about what he is going to do is to guarantee himself the
money by having both choose Split.
Except that there’s no guarantee that that will happen –
it would be relying on a bluff. Also, what I said above.
August 31, 2016 2:27 am at 2:27 am in reply to: Are ther Bedouin who didn't wear hats during Davening #1176651☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲Participant(This is probably one of the best thread titles to ever hit the CR.)
Did our forefathers daven dressed as prescribed here,
by Rav Kanievsky, or anyone else?
That’s irrelevant, and that should be obvious.
Did [how they dressed] impact on their tefilos?
[…]
But unless you want to condemn those who you have no right condemning for doing it differently, please be less insistent about the practice of others when they are davening and talking to their God.
Whatever relativism you want to push, you cannot avoid the fact
that there are halachos about one’s manner of dress for tefillah,
whether you personally think it enhances one’s davening or not.
The subject is not an empty field to run around in.
As for you, Joseph…
A Yid should be wearing his hat anytime he’s on the street
and, in general, it should always be part of his uniform.
Depending on what community you come from, that could sound
anywhere from perfectly reasonable to totally off-the-wall.
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantSomething may have been forgotten:
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/profile/hashtagposter
Hashtags are not pointless… except, of course, when they are
used in a medium in which they do not function and from which
they will not spread to any medium in which they do.
otherwise this place would be like all other chats
A “modified chat room” is not a place to have a “conversation”.
A forum is not a chat room, not even a modified one
(although “moderated chat room” was probably intended).
August 31, 2016 2:20 am at 2:20 am in reply to: Is there only one person whom you can successfully marry? #1174924☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantAren’t people’s needs widely varied in any case?
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantI’m surprised no one’s brought up whether long hair
draws attention to its owner, and if this should be
a factor in whether it is considered tzanua or not.
August 31, 2016 2:14 am at 2:14 am in reply to: Do you think it's ok to bring your kids to the beach? #1177360☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantThanks for the laughs, RebYidd!
It's also a problem for women to be somewhere where there is pritzus. I have heard in the names of both Rav Pincus and Rav Matisyahu Salomon, yibadel l'chaim that it is more of a problem for women to see inappropriate things than men.
I don’t think that applies to women simply seeing
other women in swimwear. (The post was in response
to the suggestion that a mother go to a water park;
with regard to beaches, there might be the possibility
of such an issue.)
Seriously, I know a totally blind boy who would love to go to a water park. There's no problem of him seeing women who aren't tznius, but who can go with him?
A. What makes him better than sighted boys who would enjoy a water park?
(That is, why worry about him being able to go more than we do anyone else?)
B. A sister (or, as Meno would have it, mother) comes immediately to mind.
C. What about mar’is ayin?
“Atmosphere” does not only mean how the people are dressed, although it often correlates with how they are acting. Would you take your kids to a nightclub?
apushatayid – that’s why I wonder if it’s appropriate to take a blind boy to a water park
Just what do you think goes on at water parks,
which, unlike nightclubs, are a family venue?
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲Participantin lakewood BMG there is no bein Hazemanim. as soon as tisha b’av
is over they give you a danish & then start yarchei kalla.
If I’m not mistaken, the Yarchei Kallah is not intended for the avreichim.
#PoesLaw
#nevermore
Heh.
#pallas
??? (NE, perhaps you could quote the Scriptures instead of the Script?)
If something interferes with your ‘deeply held
principles’, then it should be abolished, regardless
of how sensible it may be. This isn’t a joke.
How far does my right to abolish things for this reason extend, yekke2?
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantYou guys are hilarious. I actually started typing up a
serious response to your first post, NeutiquamErro.
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantI don’t have a kosher phone, and I see nothing wrong with that.
(I do see something wrong with the surrounding circumstances,
but this isn’t the thread for that.)
I lock up all the apps which I can't delete IE: maps.
Why would you lock Maps?
A smartphone is a phone with Internet capability.
That doesn’t sound right to me (I could easily be wrong, though).
Who cares. Just have a normal phone and use it in a kosher way.
You shouldn’t leave yourself the possibility in hand. Also,
there’s the issue of appearing to be part of the smartphone
“culture,” and how it looks to your kids. (Or some such.)
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲Participantapushatayid:
I didn't realize one could be hurt or insulted by Mr. Or Mrs. Anonymous.
If someone insults you, but you don’t know who they are, it doesn’t hurt?
Don't we rule that damages for "boshes" are determined by the social standing of the embarrassed party and the one doing the embarrassing?
That is not the same thing.
Do random anonymous internet people even make
the bottom rung of the ladder of social standing?This is a specific social setting which has its own standings,
which are real whether halachically relevant or not.
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantWho was that guy?
We don’t know, but we think he is a known poster under another name.
He showed up a while ago posting many short nonsense threads about running, not being able/willing to stop, etc, which really annoyed people.
He (was?) stopped, and has since made only small-scale appearances.
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantThat might depend on just how far to the right you are.
(I might have used “right wingtip” sometime in the past.)
August 31, 2016 1:34 am at 1:34 am in reply to: "Boy," "man," and "guy," "single," "married," and #1174662☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantWe are talking about linguistics.
August 31, 2016 1:31 am at 1:31 am in reply to: Is there only one person whom you can successfully marry? #1174922☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantWhat I mean is, can you define the word “tafkid” itself?
(It sounds like you mean “life purpose.”)
Someone who will help you grow does not = a higher person.
You’re right, I should’ve realized that.
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantWhat a difference one letter makes.
August 31, 2016 1:22 am at 1:22 am in reply to: Kumzitz on the Hudson – 2016 – Kosher or Disgusting? #1177171☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantLittle, who appointed you king?
Did you mean “chumra king?”
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantWas there a series of such “today’s recipe” threads back in the day?
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantWhat is “the koach of tziva,” and why would we do
things “for tziva?” (Sounds kind of like a”z…)
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantBack!
August 31, 2016 1:12 am at 1:12 am in reply to: "Boy," "man," and "guy," "single," "married," and #1174660☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantI probably should have put it in the Shidduchim section.
Maybe I forgot to. Maybe no one would have noticed anyway.
Also, would it make sense that I just wanted to know
how to technically put certain words together correctly?
How can “girl” be the equivalent of both “boy” and “guy”
(unless those mean the same thing)?
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantWhere are the threads with all this drama, anyway?
I’ve been off for about a week.
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantIn the old days, Joseph was notorious for his multiple screen names.
(Recently bumped example: http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/brides-wedding-vow-to-obey-husband – Ctrl+F for Joseph.
Both then and now, Joseph has a reputation for being
likely the most right-wing poster on the Coffee Room.
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantToo much information about grievances against specific posters that leaves little room for doubt about whom you are speaking is a serious halachik issue
So the question of saying negative things about
a poster has been paskened, and it’s a problem?
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲Participant“what here qualifies as motzi shem ra?”
Midvar sheker tirchak- never tell a lie
Did anyone watch the chofetz chaim video on tisha b’av?
It eventually became clear that he was questioning the truth of the story.
(At least, I think that’s what happened here.) Claiming that the story was
false is claiming that its presenters were lying.
What if the case was worse than just a restaurant?
Q: “If I did something bad, whats the right thing to do?”
A: Oh, you’re concerned about the right thing, are you?!
I’ll bring you a counter proof:
The shefatim when they brought Yosef’s cloak didn’t say your son died rather they said is this your sons cloak to which Yaakov said a wild animal are him up
How about a source that that was the right thing to do?
August 31, 2016 12:39 am at 12:39 am in reply to: Is there only one person whom you can successfully marry? #1174920☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantTo answer the OP, I think that the concept of having a “bashert”, with which many people mean a perfect fit where they will always be gloriously happy and loving, is illusionary and can lead to dangerous imaginary thinking.
That sounds reasonable. Whether marriage to one’s bashert
can fail was not the question here, though – it was whether a
successful marriage is possible with any other person.
you shouldn’t be looking for someone on a lower level than you whom you
can bring up. You should be looking for someone who will help you grow.
But if that higher person follows the same logic,
then they won’t be looking for you!
[T]he tafkid of a wife married to a widower may be a slightly different tafkid than someone who is married to someone who was never married before or someone divorced. Likewise, the tafkid of someone married to someone divorced with kids is different.
What do you mean when you say “tafkid?”
“Although I meant my advice for your benefit, I realize I shouldn’t have bothered.”
You should’ve realized that from the get go! Even if I knew you in person, who gave you the right to criticize me? I wasn’t posting to you!
I don’t have the greatest of social graces, but this sounds
rather rude to me. (And this is a public forum, so anyone
has the right to respond relevantly to any post.)
August 31, 2016 12:09 am at 12:09 am in reply to: "Boy," "man," and "guy," "single," "married," and #1174658☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantI meant the thread, including the question of a “guy” equivalent
to be about the ways we describe people in relation to shidduchim.
If you’ve ever been told of a “gal” in shidduchim, go ahead and say so.
10 – 12 tween
I disagree with a few of your terms:
10-12 are preteens, tweens are those in their twenties
I assure you that “tweens” does not mean those in their twenties.
(I’ve heard it was invented to create a new market to target.)
August 24, 2016 5:28 am at 5:28 am in reply to: "Boy," "man," and "guy," "single," "married," and #1174614☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲Participant(The title was supposed to end in “divorced” – a quirk of the
system made it turn out the way it did. You can see it in the URL.)
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantThe question about what a lazy person would do isn’t about what’s
actually harder, but what lazy people would imagine to be harder.
I must remind myself not to judge. These must be
closed communities who know nothing of the outside world.
I wasn’t aware that our lives are meant to be influenced
by the outside world. Please don’t judge me for it, though.
August 24, 2016 5:23 am at 5:23 am in reply to: Just testing the various “allowed markup”s ☑️❎🆙 #1212906☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantThread titles can apparently get cut off depending
on what’s in them (like an overdose of punctuation).
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲Participant“…because guys making the girls wait”
They don’t make them wait.
How is that unclear? (And then “they” remains the same.)
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantI asked Rabbi Simcha Bunim Cohen about that, and he said that
presumably (“mistama”) it works (to establish the game as one
that you personally don’t write while playing).
Sam2, I don’t know where my family’s copy of The Shabbos Kitchen is…
☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantIt sounds like she may be quitting the CR, that’s all.
-
AuthorPosts