☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 1,501 through 1,550 (of 2,752 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: This is a perfect time to be a unicorn. #1179955

    That profile’s gotten more interesting since the last time I read it. 🙂

    in reply to: Changed usernames #1214764

    yeshivishe kup – original: ??

    Currently links to –

    http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/profile/yeshivishekup – but there’s nothing there, nor at that address with the space put in.

    in reply to: A rabbit died for that keychain! #1179898

    ?????

    “Rabbit’s-foot” keychains.

    in reply to: What happened to the CR? #1189037

    “What happened to the CR?” is probably a valid question once

    every few months. There are constants, and some carryover from

    one period to the next, but eventually the environment changes

    enough that it sort of doesn’t quite feel the same. (Am I wrong?)

    in reply to: Gemora Kup #1209730

    I only know Yisrael David Finkelstein.

    in reply to: Used Car Salesmen #1179894

    I’m sure I’ve seen a thread about this

    before, and probably not too long ago…

    in reply to: CR Relationship #1180015

    It makes me uncomfortable talking to men if

    I don’t even know if they are married or not.

    But once you know it’s one or the other,

    do you then become equally comfortable?

    If not, which situation is more comfortable?

    in reply to: the power of one family #1180039

    Me: In English, “tz” is sounded as tzaddi-sin, not tzaddi-shin.

    Correction: It is, of course, sounded as tes-shin. (Also, how

    they would read “tzitzis” would’ve been a better question.)

    in reply to: "Up and back" – the same as "back and forth?" #1209331

    Me: …it’s in the English version of Mishnas Rebbi Aharon.

    in reply to: Midvar sheker tirchak- never tell a lie #1176571

    Yes, but CA wanted to use it for when you’ve done something wrong.

    in reply to: Screen Names #1176214

    And who do you endorse in this year’s election, Mr. Jerusalem?

    in reply to: the power of one family #1180028

    That’s one of the funniest posts I’ve seen in a while.

    in reply to: Cancelling Bein Hazmanim? #1174973

    Superb. Utterly superb.

    Why, thank you! 🙂

    I understand now… (That’s what happens

    when all you know is that it was his sled.)

    #butnoonewasthere #messengerofevil

    in reply to: hair #1176888

    thats the MAIN reason why im becoming a

    pharmacist to find a cure for that sibling

    I hope you are not setting yourself up for disappointment.

    Have you discussed this with anyone? (Please don’t take

    my personal pessimism too seriously, though.)

    in reply to: Midvar sheker tirchak- never tell a lie #1176569

    So mechiras Yosef is justified, but Yaakov will be distressed to

    hear of it, so misleading him is justified in order to spare him.

    This doesn’t mean that if you do something actually wrong, it’s okay

    to lie about it because hearing about it will distress the other person.

    What do you say to that, Coffee Addict?

    in reply to: the power of one family #1180023

    In English, “tz” is sounded as tzaddi-sin, not tzaddi-shin.

    (How would you and he spell “tzitzis?”)

    What’s the reason to be nice only to older males?

    in reply to: Screen Names #1176205

    iacisrmma, I’m looking at you.

    in reply to: Can you guess the outcome of this true story? #1174847

    What actually happened was… B.

    Both contestants chose Split (and both received half).

    In an interview years later, Player 2 said he would never

    have done anything but Take if not for Player 1’s tactic.

    in reply to: Can you guess the outcome of this true story? #1174846

    Google it. […] Golden Balls.

    Why would you post the source?

    Also, why would he ask the question if it’s obvious?

    […]

    Mainly, I choose C because the answer is supposed to be surprising.

    I didn’t say the answer was surprising. Considering the subject

    matter, wouldn’t it be wise not to make any assumptions? 🙂

    [E]ven if he is worried that guy2 will do take after all,

    there still is no point in his doing take. If they both do take,

    no one gets the money, so he may as well do split.

    Therefore, the logical assumption is that guy1 will do split. If guy2 figured that out, he would do take, so he can get everything.

    People who are less generous than you see a point in preventing the

    other person from getting money when they don’t get any themselves.

    The question a player must ask himself is “How likely is the other person

    not to do what they say they will – what will they gain by not doing so?”

    In this case, all Player 1 could gain by not doing what he said he would

    (by splitting) was giving Player 2 all the money. Why would he do that?

    It’s more believable that Player 1 would leave the decision to Player 2,

    who could either Take for a mutual loss or Split for a possible gain.

    The only reason for someone to be so adamant

    about what he is going to do is to guarantee himself the

    money by having both choose Split.

    Except that there’s no guarantee that that will happen –

    it would be relying on a bluff. Also, what I said above.

    in reply to: Are ther Bedouin who didn't wear hats during Davening #1176651

    (This is probably one of the best thread titles to ever hit the CR.)

    Did our forefathers daven dressed as prescribed here,

    by Rav Kanievsky, or anyone else?

    That’s irrelevant, and that should be obvious.

    Did [how they dressed] impact on their tefilos?

    […]

    But unless you want to condemn those who you have no right condemning for doing it differently, please be less insistent about the practice of others when they are davening and talking to their God.

    Whatever relativism you want to push, you cannot avoid the fact

    that there are halachos about one’s manner of dress for tefillah,

    whether you personally think it enhances one’s davening or not.

    The subject is not an empty field to run around in.

    As for you, Joseph…

    A Yid should be wearing his hat anytime he’s on the street

    and, in general, it should always be part of his uniform.

    Depending on what community you come from, that could sound

    anywhere from perfectly reasonable to totally off-the-wall.

    in reply to: I do declare #1174831

    Something may have been forgotten:

    http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/profile/hashtagposter

    Hashtags are not pointless… except, of course, when they are

    used in a medium in which they do not function and from which

    they will not spread to any medium in which they do.

    otherwise this place would be like all other chats

    A “modified chat room” is not a place to have a “conversation”.

    A forum is not a chat room, not even a modified one

    (although “moderated chat room” was probably intended).

    in reply to: Is there only one person whom you can successfully marry? #1174924

    Aren’t people’s needs widely varied in any case?

    in reply to: hair #1176880

    I’m surprised no one’s brought up whether long hair

    draws attention to its owner, and if this should be

    a factor in whether it is considered tzanua or not.

    in reply to: Do you think it's ok to bring your kids to the beach? #1177360

    Thanks for the laughs, RebYidd!

    It's also a problem for women to be somewhere where there is pritzus. I have heard in the names of both Rav Pincus and Rav Matisyahu Salomon, yibadel l'chaim that it is more of a problem for women to see inappropriate things than men.

    I don’t think that applies to women simply seeing

    other women in swimwear. (The post was in response

    to the suggestion that a mother go to a water park;

    with regard to beaches, there might be the possibility

    of such an issue.)

    Seriously, I know a totally blind boy who would love to go to a water park. There's no problem of him seeing women who aren't tznius, but who can go with him?

    A. What makes him better than sighted boys who would enjoy a water park?

    (That is, why worry about him being able to go more than we do anyone else?)

    B. A sister (or, as Meno would have it, mother) comes immediately to mind.

    C. What about mar’is ayin?

    “Atmosphere” does not only mean how the people are dressed, although it often correlates with how they are acting. Would you take your kids to a nightclub?

    apushatayid – that’s why I wonder if it’s appropriate to take a blind boy to a water park

    Just what do you think goes on at water parks,

    which, unlike nightclubs, are a family venue?

    in reply to: Cancelling Bein Hazmanim? #1174971

    in lakewood BMG there is no bein Hazemanim. as soon as tisha b’av

    is over they give you a danish & then start yarchei kalla.

    If I’m not mistaken, the Yarchei Kallah is not intended for the avreichim.

    #PoesLaw

    #nevermore

    Heh.

    #pallas

    ??? (NE, perhaps you could quote the Scriptures instead of the Script?)

    If something interferes with your ‘deeply held

    principles’, then it should be abolished, regardless

    of how sensible it may be. This isn’t a joke.

    How far does my right to abolish things for this reason extend, yekke2?

    in reply to: Cancelling Bein Hazmanim? #1174970

    You guys are hilarious. I actually started typing up a

    serious response to your first post, NeutiquamErro.

    in reply to: 30000 frum people have a kosher phone #1174744

    I don’t have a kosher phone, and I see nothing wrong with that.

    (I do see something wrong with the surrounding circumstances,

    but this isn’t the thread for that.)

    I lock up all the apps which I can't delete IE: maps.

    Why would you lock Maps?

    A smartphone is a phone with Internet capability.

    That doesn’t sound right to me (I could easily be wrong, though).

    Who cares. Just have a normal phone and use it in a kosher way.

    You shouldn’t leave yourself the possibility in hand. Also,

    there’s the issue of appearing to be part of the smartphone

    “culture,” and how it looks to your kids. (Or some such.)

    in reply to: Regarding recent cofferoom DRAMA #1176261

    apushatayid:

    I didn't realize one could be hurt or insulted by Mr. Or Mrs. Anonymous.

    If someone insults you, but you don’t know who they are, it doesn’t hurt?

    Don't we rule that damages for "boshes" are determined by the social standing of the embarrassed party and the one doing the embarrassing?

    That is not the same thing.

    Do random anonymous internet people even make
    the bottom rung of the ladder of social standing?

    This is a specific social setting which has its own standings,

    which are real whether halachically relevant or not.

    in reply to: Hi everyone #1174932

    Who was that guy?

    We don’t know, but we think he is a known poster under another name.

    He showed up a while ago posting many short nonsense threads about running, not being able/willing to stop, etc, which really annoyed people.

    He (was?) stopped, and has since made only small-scale appearances.

    in reply to: Regarding recent cofferoom DRAMA #1176258

    That might depend on just how far to the right you are.

    (I might have used “right wingtip” sometime in the past.)

    in reply to: "Boy," "man," and "guy," "single," "married," and #1174662

    We are talking about linguistics.

    in reply to: Is there only one person whom you can successfully marry? #1174922

    What I mean is, can you define the word “tafkid” itself?

    (It sounds like you mean “life purpose.”)

    Someone who will help you grow does not = a higher person.

    You’re right, I should’ve realized that.

    in reply to: Story time – NEW WORLD GAME JAN 7 #1174805

    What a difference one letter makes.

    in reply to: Kumzitz on the Hudson – 2016 – Kosher or Disgusting? #1177171

    Little, who appointed you king?

    Did you mean “chumra king?”

    in reply to: today's recipe: mushroom barley soup #1174613

    Was there a series of such “today’s recipe” threads back in the day?

    in reply to: the power of one family #1180021

    What is “the koach of tziva,” and why would we do

    things “for tziva?” (Sounds kind of like a”z…)

    in reply to: The Hora #1174606

    Back!

    in reply to: "Boy," "man," and "guy," "single," "married," and #1174660

    I probably should have put it in the Shidduchim section.

    Maybe I forgot to. Maybe no one would have noticed anyway.

    Also, would it make sense that I just wanted to know

    how to technically put certain words together correctly?

    How can “girl” be the equivalent of both “boy” and “guy”

    (unless those mean the same thing)?

    in reply to: Regarding recent cofferoom DRAMA #1176256

    Where are the threads with all this drama, anyway?

    I’ve been off for about a week.

    in reply to: Regarding recent cofferoom DRAMA #1176255

    In the old days, Joseph was notorious for his multiple screen names.

    (Recently bumped example: http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/brides-wedding-vow-to-obey-husband – Ctrl+F for Joseph.

    Both then and now, Joseph has a reputation for being

    likely the most right-wing poster on the Coffee Room.

    in reply to: SYAG COME BACK! #1174854

    Too much information about grievances against specific posters that leaves little room for doubt about whom you are speaking is a serious halachik issue

    So the question of saying negative things about

    a poster has been paskened, and it’s a problem?

    in reply to: Midvar sheker tirchak- never tell a lie #1176567

    “what here qualifies as motzi shem ra?”

    Midvar sheker tirchak- never tell a lie

    Did anyone watch the chofetz chaim video on tisha b’av?

    It eventually became clear that he was questioning the truth of the story.

    (At least, I think that’s what happened here.) Claiming that the story was

    false is claiming that its presenters were lying.

    What if the case was worse than just a restaurant?

    Q: “If I did something bad, whats the right thing to do?”

    A: Oh, you’re concerned about the right thing, are you?!

    I’ll bring you a counter proof:

    The shefatim when they brought Yosef’s cloak didn’t say your son died rather they said is this your sons cloak to which Yaakov said a wild animal are him up

    How about a source that that was the right thing to do?

    in reply to: Is there only one person whom you can successfully marry? #1174920

    To answer the OP, I think that the concept of having a “bashert”, with which many people mean a perfect fit where they will always be gloriously happy and loving, is illusionary and can lead to dangerous imaginary thinking.

    That sounds reasonable. Whether marriage to one’s bashert

    can fail was not the question here, though – it was whether a

    successful marriage is possible with any other person.

    you shouldn’t be looking for someone on a lower level than you whom you

    can bring up. You should be looking for someone who will help you grow.

    But if that higher person follows the same logic,

    then they won’t be looking for you!

    [T]he tafkid of a wife married to a widower may be a slightly different tafkid than someone who is married to someone who was never married before or someone divorced. Likewise, the tafkid of someone married to someone divorced with kids is different.

    What do you mean when you say “tafkid?”

    “Although I meant my advice for your benefit, I realize I shouldn’t have bothered.”

    You should’ve realized that from the get go! Even if I knew you in person, who gave you the right to criticize me? I wasn’t posting to you!

    I don’t have the greatest of social graces, but this sounds

    rather rude to me. (And this is a public forum, so anyone

    has the right to respond relevantly to any post.)

    in reply to: "Boy," "man," and "guy," "single," "married," and #1174658

    I meant the thread, including the question of a “guy” equivalent

    to be about the ways we describe people in relation to shidduchim.

    If you’ve ever been told of a “gal” in shidduchim, go ahead and say so.

    10 – 12 tween

    I disagree with a few of your terms:

    10-12 are preteens, tweens are those in their twenties

    I assure you that “tweens” does not mean those in their twenties.

    (I’ve heard it was invented to create a new market to target.)

    in reply to: "Boy," "man," and "guy," "single," "married," and #1174614

    (The title was supposed to end in “divorced” – a quirk of the

    system made it turn out the way it did. You can see it in the URL.)

    in reply to: what age is considered an older single? #1170467

    The question about what a lazy person would do isn’t about what’s

    actually harder, but what lazy people would imagine to be harder.

    I must remind myself not to judge. These must be

    closed communities who know nothing of the outside world.

    I wasn’t aware that our lives are meant to be influenced

    by the outside world. Please don’t judge me for it, though.

    in reply to: Just testing the various “allowed markup”s ☑️❎🆙 #1212906

    Thread titles can apparently get cut off depending

    on what’s in them (like an overdose of punctuation).

    in reply to: what age is considered an older single? #1170464

    “…because guys making the girls wait”

    They don’t make them wait.

    How is that unclear? (And then “they” remains the same.)

    in reply to: Games not for Shabbos #1211590

    I asked Rabbi Simcha Bunim Cohen about that, and he said that

    presumably (“mistama”) it works (to establish the game as one

    that you personally don’t write while playing).

    Sam2, I don’t know where my family’s copy of The Shabbos Kitchen is…

    in reply to: That's it I'm done :( #1170214

    It sounds like she may be quitting the CR, that’s all.

Viewing 50 posts - 1,501 through 1,550 (of 2,752 total)