☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 751 through 800 (of 2,752 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Let's talk about board games #1422552

    In response to >this<:

    Nothing… for the right audience. Is that audience here, though?

    in reply to: Rabbi Aharon Lopiansky on Modern Othodox/Dati vs. Chareidi #1422541

    Syag:
    I didn’t intend to join the fray, and I’m actually not a fan of the discussion
    of this subject on the CR in general – I just thought the article was one worth
    sharing and relevant to a popular subject, so I’d post it.

    I try to avoid voicing an opinion on complex matters that I’m not qualified
    to have an opinion on. My feelings about the thread derailment were…
    Well, maybe they weren’t “justified”, but I was disappointed, after seeing
    the post count on the thread, to come in and find mostly that stuff
    (and I haven’t experienced a thread derailment before, or at least
    one that I remember right now, so I wasn’t expecting it).

    I thought that providing some context for the article was in order –
    would you not question why it had been published otherwise?

    Thank you for the compliment.

    in reply to: Rabbi Aharon Lopiansky on Modern Othodox/Dati vs. Chareidi #1422532

    What if you listen to Jewish music for its own sake?

    in reply to: games at Chanukah party #1421753

    I think I’d better prove I’m not going to throw something at you that’s played in 20 nano-rounds divided into 3 segments each, in which you build a tableau of hypercubes based on their inverse potential value…

    Blurble
    2-12 players / ages 6 and up / 30 minutes [Party game, word game]

    In each round, the “Blurbler” flips picture cards from the deck and tries to
    say a word that begins with the same letter that the pictured object does
    as quickly as possible, racing against first the player to their left, then the
    next player, etc. The player who says a word first keeps the card.
    (Words that have been said once cannot be used again in the same game.
    No proper nouns are allowed. Words must be listed in the dictionary.)
    This continues until the Blurbler has raced each of the other players once.
    Play then continues with the next player being the Blurbler.
    After each player has been the Blurbler a certain number of times,
    the game ends, and the player with the most cards is the winner.

    in reply to: Can you change the way people pronounce your last name? #1421751

    No comment from you on the sports, Joseph – so do you find that acceptable? : )

    in reply to: Can you change the way people pronounce your last name? #1421744

    That’s tar’ZHAY. (If your peer group is mostly made up of male
    and/or yeshivish Orthodox Jews, you might not have heard it.)

    in reply to: games at Chanukah party #1421731

    To clarify, my area of expertise is commercially sold games, and I’m not sure that’s what you’re looking for (also, they mostly – even “party games” – can’t handle really large groups). If you are looking for the sort of thing you buy in a box, tell me how many players there will be, their age (range), and how long you want the game to be (or not be), and, perhaps, whether you want the game to be more about the game or the players (or anything else that you think might be relevant). (There’s no guarantee that a game fitting your criteria exists, though, or that I am or will become aware of it if it does.) If that’s not what you’re looking for, you should probably just Google [large group games].

    in reply to: Calling All Chacha-Chacha Hebrew and Yiddish Readers! #1421703

    What’s this “chacha-chacha” business?

    in reply to: Rabbi Aharon Lopiansky on Modern Othodox/Dati vs. Chareidi #1421670

    Syag, my intention was to contribute material to the general discussion of MO taking place on the CR – I didn’t expect much of a thread to result (I’d have been okay with getting no response whatsoever).

    in reply to: Musical HVAC on Shabbos #1421672

    I think the Shabbos issue might be the same regardless of how pleasant (or not) the noise is. As for the question of music, the idea that the system qualifies as a musical instrument seems doubtful.

    in reply to: The Incomplete Guide to Nice Little Card Games #1421558

    Any questions should be asked >here<, please.

    in reply to: games at Chanukah party #1421591

    I’ll try to get back to you.

    in reply to: The Incomplete Guide to Nice Little Card Games #1421588

    Another get-the-fewest-points game, in which all players
    choose the card they’re going to play at the same time.

    6 nimmt! (aka Take 6(!), Take 5(!), Category 5, and Slide 5)
    2-10p (very few or many players not recommended) / 8^ / 45m

    The object of the game is to score the fewest points, which come from
    cards that players will be taking over the course of the game.
    The game consists of a deck of cards numbered 1-104 (we’ll talk about
    how many points they’re worth later). Gameplay revolves around four
    piles of cards. One card is placed on each pile to start, and the players
    each start with 10 cards in their hands.
    In a round, each of the players chooses one of their cards to play and
    places it face down before them. The players then reveal their cards
    simultaneously, and the cards are then placed onto the different piles
    in lowest-to-highest order, as follows.
    Each card is placed on the pile whose top card is the closest to it from
    below (the highest number that is still lower than the card’s number).
    For example, the 100 would always go on top of the 99 if it was there,
    followed by the 98, etc.
    If a card is not higher than any of the top cards of the 4 piles,
    the player whose card it is must choose a pile and take all the
    cards in it to keep, and the card they played then becomes
    the top (and only) card of that pile.
    If a pile reaches 6 cards, the player whose card was the 6th
    must take the first 5 cards to keep, and the card they played
    then becomes the top (and only) card of that pile

    After 10 rounds, the players have no cards left. Scores are counted up,
    and if any player has a score higher than 66, the game ends, and the
    player with the fewest points is the winner. If no player has reached
    66 points, all the cards are reshuffled and the game starts again,
    with players keeping the points they had scored so far.

    The point values of the cards are as follows (they have point symbols
    on them, so players don’t have to remember all of this when scoring):
    Numbers ending with a 5 – 2 points.
    Numbers ending with a 0 – 3 points.
    Doubled-digit numbers (11, 22, etc.) – 5 points.
    “55” – 7 points (it’s doubled and ends with a 5).
    All other numbers – 1 point.

    This game is pretty high on luck. For a little more predictability and less
    chaos, use only cards equal to the number of players times 10, plus 4
    more, starting from 1. (For example, with 4 players, 1-40, plus 41-44,
    or with 3 players, 1-30, plus 31-34.)

    in reply to: Rabbi Aharon Lopiansky on Modern Othodox/Dati vs. Chareidi #1421566

    Here is a quote: “relative isolation from the world around”.
    But you can study secular knowledge without going into the outside world.

    Or is this just such an extreme digression that it has nothing at all to do with the thread?

    You hit it on the head, Neville. I find it quite annoying that almost none
    of this thread (I don’t count Avi’s obvious nonsense) is discussion of the
    article and instead is a discussion of Shlomo Carlebach’s listening habits.

    in reply to: [Fiction] A Nazi attempting to unleash a biological weapon in Israel #1421579

    Akuperma, only one person is needed to convey a bioweapon into
    a foreign country, and they can arrange for themselves not to be
    contaminated with it, and leave the area before contagion becomes
    a possibility. Even if they couldn’t, they’re one person and might be
    considered expendable. I’m not sure what you mean.

    in reply to: He’s Hot, She’s Cold; Windows Open or Closed? #1421574

    The answer is simple – the warmth in a room can be increased for one
    of the occupants by having them put on or go under more layers, but
    the cold in a room cannot easily be increased in such a manner.
    Thus, logic dictates that the room be kept at the cooler temperature.

    in reply to: Choosing Correct Category In New Threads #1421575

    I’m afraid all evidence is to the contrary, dear sir.

    in reply to: The Incomplete Guide to Nice Little Card Games #1421571

    Continuing the theme of avoiding points, here’s a game with
    somewhat similar scoring to No Thanks!, but that features
    more traditional play-a-card-on-your-turn, color-collecting
    gameplay rather than No Thanks!’s series of pseudo-auctions.

    Parade
    2-6p (4 probably best) / 8^ / 25-40m(?)

    The object of the game is to score the fewest points, which come
    from cards that players will be taking over the course of the game.
    Each card is worth its number (0-10) in points, but the player with
    the most cards of a color only scores 1 point for each of their cards
    of that color (there are 6 colors, each one featuring a different
    Alice in Wonderland character).
    [With only 2 players, one player must have 2 more cards
    of a color than their opponent does to “have the most”.]

    Players start with 5 cards in their hand, and a line of 6 cards is
    laid out horizontally in the center. On their turn, players must
    play 1 card from their hand to the back of the line of cards.
    The played card’s number is counted forward from it, and all cards
    after that number (so the 4th card and on, if a 3 was played) which
    either are the same color as the played card or have a number
    equal to or less than the played card’s number are taken by the
    player and kept in front of them. The remaining cards are shifted to
    close any gaps in the line, and the player draws a card from the deck.

    Play continues in this manner until either the deck of cards is empty,
    or any player has at least 1 card of each color in front of them
    (that player would not draw a card at the end of their turn).
    Each (other) player then takes one more turn without drawing a card
    at the end, so that all players have 4 cards in their hand. Then, each
    player puts 2 of the 4 cards in their hand in front of them to score
    along with the cards they took over the course of the game.
    Scores are counted and the player with the fewest points wins.

    (As a variant, you can play for most points instead of fewest.)

    in reply to: BOO!!! #1418548

    I think some musical emojis might have been modded out of my post.
    (Either that, or I didn’t add them in a way that the CR could handle.)

    in reply to: Rabbi Aharon Lopiansky on Modern Othodox/Dati vs. Chareidi #1418546

    I didn’t see anything in that article about knowledge or ignorance
    of secular wisdom, Avi…

    in reply to: Rabbi Aharon Lopiansky on Modern Othodox/Dati vs. Chareidi #1418534

    My apologies, folks. Here’s a repost with better line breaks:

    We, as chareidi Jews, do not define ourselves as “observant Jews,”
    and very possibly this is the major distinction between “dati” or
    “Modern Orthodox” and “chareidi.” A Modern Orthodox/dati
    person puts great stress on fidelity to mitzvah observance.
    He has no problem living a culturally secular life. Perhaps he
    even embraces it, seeing it as an ideal harmony. (There are even
    some who say that beliefs and believing should not enter into
    the criteria of defining orthodox, just practice – i.e., orthopractice.)
    We, however, feel that a Torah Jew is someone whose mindset
    is Torahdig; whose heart throbs with the regesh of kedusha;
    whose perspective on life is that this world is merely the
    platform for accomplishment, but inherently this world
    is transient. The chareidi Jew may (or may not) feel that
    it is important to fully function in the outside world, but
    we all agree that our thoughts, feelings, values, and culture
    must be light-years apart. We shun spectator sports,
    entertainment, the dining culture, and many more
    cultural phenomena of the society around us.
    The place and means for attaining this neshamah of
    Yiddishkeit is the intense and formative years at yeshivah.
    I am not sure how it happens, but being totally steeped in
    Abaye and Rava, working at understanding the emes,
    putting all our energies and emotions into Torah,
    transforms us. For others, this chinuch also includes
    working on shemiras einayim, being in close proximity
    to people of stature, and infusing our tefillah with
    undisturbed emotional energy. We are chareidi because
    we spent all those years in yeshivah. For the difference
    between chareidi and dati lies not in the color of the
    yarmulke, or even in the exactitude of fulfilling mitzvos.
    The difference lies in the mindset. And that mindset is
    forged in those years of immersion in the Torah and
    avodah, and relative isolation from the world around.
    It also imparts an eidelkeit and ehrlichkeit, and all the
    other middos tovos that we expect of a ben Torah.

    (For context, here’s the rest of the article:)
    Even if the army had no negative influence, the robbing
    of our youths’ formative years as a ben Torah would be
    a price that we could not pay. A chareidi Jew has but one
    aspiration in life. He does not have a “dream retirement”
    nor even dares contemplate it. We spend decades on the
    chinuch of our (many, kein yirbu) children; we pay the vast
    majority of our income for their yeshivos; and we hope to
    continue working so that if they wish to learn they may
    do so, and so that their children in turn should have the
    opportunity to realize their spiritual potential.
    Our tefillah is one: banim u’vnei vanim oskim b’Torah
    uv’mitzvos. Our wildest fantasy is not the dream house
    for our golden years; rather, it is being surrounded by
    children and children’s children who are all ehrliche Yidden,
    ovdei Hashem, and talmidei chachamim to the best of their
    ability. The only way that this can happen is by intense
    Torah study and total immersion in avodas Hashem at this
    most significant part of one’s life.
    This is our fiercest desire for every single one of our children,
    not just for those mythical “1,800 iluyim.” True, it takes many
    of them a few years to become full bnei Torah, but it is the
    result that counts. Our definition of a Torah Yid is someone
    who at least internally continues his “am l’vadad yishkon,”
    even as the realities of life demand that he freely interact
    with the world around him.

    in reply to: The Incomplete Guide to Nice Little Card Games #1418538

    Liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiine breaeareaeareaeareaeareaeaks!!!!!!!!!!!

    Also, the play time should probably have been listed as 20-30 minutes.

    (Future entries will be rechecked. And. Line. Broken. Into. Submission.)

    in reply to: The Incomplete Guide to Nice Little Card Games #1418532

    (Well, that’s obviously a great start. 🙂 At least now I’ll know where to put line breaks.)

    It might have been unclear that after a player takes a card, that player,
    not the starting player, must then choose whether to keep or refuse the next card.
    I also forgot to mention that players’ remaining chips are kept hidden according to
    the rules, although some people do prefer to play with them kept open.

    in reply to: Hey, RebYidd #1418524

    “We’d all be monkeys falling into canals if we didn’t hold our last bastion against monkeyism.”
    I saw that somewhere, and it reminded me of you. 🙂

    in reply to: Why are the lakewood rabbanim so against an eruv in thier Town?? #1418484

    So what are the facts, does it halachakly have shishim ribo bChol Yom passing or not?

    That’s a question of metzius, not halacha.

    in reply to: BOO!!! #1418505

    We say “Refuah sh’leimah,” that’s what we do say…

    in reply to: What’s a good setup for a Chanukah holiday pic of my dog? #1418480

    Who are they?

    in reply to: Jews Who Are Known By Their Non-Jewish Name #1418483

    “Abaye” was a nickname, not a name used by non-Jews.

    in reply to: Mechi Teissi #1418430

    Jakob, that’s a kal vachomer.

    in reply to: WaPo Article When Lubavitcher Rebbe Was Niftar #1417110

    In an essay included in The Eye of the Storm, Rav Aharon Feldman agrees with RebYidd here,
    and says that the belief that the Rebbe would be Moshiach above all those who were niftar in previous times
    causes us to think that the believer is not in their right mind (not a direct quote). He doesn’t totally reject
    the idea of Moshiach coming from the dead, though (I don’t remember the details, it’s been a while).

    in reply to: Jews Who Are Known By Their Non-Jewish Name #1417108

    I didn’t know קטן was a name in Tanach. Where is it?

    in reply to: Endangered animals – Halachic Perspective #1417107

    In the case of that era, something far out of the ordinary is said to have happened.

    in reply to: Rav Avigdor Miller On Joseph The Troll #1417105

    SHP is (or wants to be perceived as) the copyright holder on Rav Miller’s works.
    They ought to contact YWN directly.
    (It’s pretty funny that they posted what they did on this page as well.)

    in reply to: Hashkafic views on taking money from the medinah #1412976

    [R]emember the girls’ school threatened with closure in England
    because they did not teach a certain accepted liberal value?

    I don’t think that had anything to do with being government-funded;
    it was about the government recognizing them as a valid school.

    in reply to: Jews Who Are Known By Their Non-Jewish Name #1412926

    Might this have something to do with some Sefardim using English names as the primary names for girls?

    in reply to: Why pickles are better than marshmallows #1412089

    My family’s current phone system has a corded phone on the base as well as cordless handsets.

    in reply to: Funny Shidduch Stories #1410695

    It sounds like the joke being made in BMYer’s story was that the reason the boy opens the
    car door for the girl is that they’re afraid the girl might damage it if she opened it herself.

    in reply to: Mesichists Explained by ChabadShlucha #1409059

    GAON, your quotation in post #1408986 seems to have nothing to do with what you claim it’s talking about.

    in reply to: Researching potential shidduchim? #1408559

    Potentially, yes; probably, not. Also, I’d assume she means that posts go through
    without prior moderation, not that there are no moderators. Am I right, Shopping?

    It’s possible that I saw it but didn’t have enough of a reaction to remember it.

    in reply to: Gamers #1406017

    We’ve got a live specimen, folks.

    in reply to: 5 Second Rule #1406014

    It’s of no medical benefit.

    in reply to: 5 Second Rule #1406015

    (That is, bacteria doesn’t need 5 seconds to get onto your food.)

    in reply to: Did you know? #1406016

    No. 🙂

    in reply to: Did you know? #1405939

    The 7-day week probably dates back to Adam haRishon.

    in reply to: Did you know? #1405938

    The temperature required in an area for the average woman to be
    comfortable there is higher than that required for the average man.

    in reply to: Gamers #1405928

    (The video-game culture’s term for non-gamers who play games is “casual,” used as a noun.
    Single-game devotees like mahjongg friend are only a tabletop phenomenon, and that culture
    cares a lot less about the label.)

    in reply to: Illegal smuggling #1405926
    in reply to: Illegal smuggling #1405922

    “Clickbait” is links which are given sensational or curiosity-inducing text to get people to click on them.

    in reply to: Gamers #1405919

    The precise definition of “gamer” and how much significance “gamer” status has or should have are, shall we say, subject to dispute.

Viewing 50 posts - 751 through 800 (of 2,752 total)