philosopher

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 151 through 200 (of 582 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Girls Congregating the Streets on Shabbos #691404
    philosopher
    Member

    sofdvar, I highly doubt any Rov will tell you that you can only go out twice a month. I think your Rov will tell you that you shouldn’t go out more than you need to.

    Nobody is objecting to the fact that kol kovida bas melech pnima. Everyone understands women and girls should not hang out on the streets, in the malls or anywhere for that matter, just for the sake of hanging out.

    However to posken halacha from the sources that Kasha brought down, while it’s indeed impressive, does not mean that in actuality we women can only go out twice a month. We have already been through a similiar argument in the Feminism thread where I don’t remember who wrote that the Rambam poskened that a man has the right to divorce his wife if she refuses to wash his feet. We have argued to what extent minhugim and das Yehudi has an effect on interpreting halacha. The bottom line is that most husbands would first of all not ask their wife to wash their feet and one who would and the wife would refuse and the husband would seek a get because of that reason, the Rov or bes din I think would seriously question his sanity.

    Let’s understand something. The Torah was given to humans be they men or women. There is nothing in the Torah or halachas that if they pertain to someone they cannot keep anywhere or anytime.

    Let’s discuss REALITY and halacha is ALWAYS APPLICABLE IN EVERY SITUATION AND GENERATION.

    For starters should girls over bas mitzva not go to school? Attending school makes them go out AT LEAST five times a week!

    If a father can’t take his child to the doctor because he’s working, the mother is not allowed to if she’ll overstep her two times a month out of the house allowance?

    Girls who graduated school and women until they have kids would have to sit home doing nothing.

    Walking to air out or for excersize, getting together at a resturaunt with freinds or even going out with one’s husband should be abolished?

    Not every man can go grocery shopping that would entail the woman of the house to go out AT LEAST 4 times a week.

    What about buying shoes and clothing for kids. Evreyone who has kids knows that this is not a one time ordeal. You need to buy and exchange for size, return what didn’t fit well, etc., boys stuff from one store, girls from another,skirts from one place matching tops from another, etc., etc., etc.

    There’s no denying that’s it’s VITAL in today’s generation for girls to play outside with their freinds, go to their freinds houses to socialize, (in the Rambam’s time I doubt they had such social scenes which today is vital)go to school for extra ciricular activities such as plays, and other such VITAL mental health (yes it’s mental health for the girls)needs.

    Halacha is poskened by Rabbonim and not by bringing down short excerpts and posting them on the internet.

    In the times of the Bais Hamikdosh girls would GO OUT and DANCE in the vineyards and there would be shidduchim made there. Would we have such a social scene today? Absolutely not. We need to remember that minhugim play a huge role in the day to day life of Jews.

    The bottom line is that girls or woman should not hang out day and night in the street, but coming, going, socializing in front of their own houses (if applicable – in the city in front of aparment buildings it might not be the correct thing to do)

    Nobody’s going against halacha if we go out according to our needs. We women can still act btznius even though our needs our different.

    Let’s be realistic. Someone who forbids to let their wife and daughters go out not more than twice a month would be considered abusive two say the least. At to that that such a man would probably be considered mushega.

    Kol kevuda bas melech penima means that girls and women do not stam hang out, look for attention from men and boys, and are aidel and refined. It also means they respect and understand the fact that they should not congregate on the street or in front of a yeshiva or bais midrash and not walk in a loud or wild manner.

    Kol kevoda bas melech penima means that not a women’s dress, not her job (other than being a mother) and not her physical guf is her kovod. Only what is hidden, her soul and her tznius, and the ruchnius that she permeates in the penimious of her house, that is her kovod.

    in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025755
    philosopher
    Member

    WIY, I totaly agree with you as well.

    in reply to: Girls Congregating the Streets on Shabbos #691383
    philosopher
    Member

    I cannot imagine not letting my daughters visit their friends or chasing my girls in when they’ll be teens because they can’t socialize in front of our house.

    Emphasis should be placed on not laughing loudly or acting untznius and wild. But we have to let them live!

    If girls are indeed congregating in places that are near yeshivas batei medrashim and the like, for hours and/or loudly then there is indeed a problem here.

    in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025751
    philosopher
    Member

    Wolf, Don’t try too hard, I didn’t mean you.

    in reply to: Girls Congregating the Streets on Shabbos #691374
    philosopher
    Member

    The reason there are tons of girls on the street is that b”H there are tons of frum girls! They are going and coming and socializing. There’s nothing wrong with that unless they are being very loud and raucous.

    yb613 (yeshiva bochur?)I gather you’re not a girl, so if it bothers you try to stay off the streets.

    in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025747
    philosopher
    Member

    WIY, that’s really cute.

    in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025746
    philosopher
    Member

    Some people who think of themselves as optimists should look over their posts to see if what they write is consistent with how they think of themselves regarding seeing only the good in others.

    If they feel that they are judging things that need to be discussed so they can be corrected which is the point of airing out thoughts in the CR, then they can’t jump on others with snide remarks when the others are judging situations and they don’t agree with their opinions.

    One can counter opinions and disagree, that’s the point of a good argument so all angles can be explored, but one cannot attack the others right to judge.

    in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025737
    philosopher
    Member

    And what really gets me is those that judge me for judging between right and wrong judge others for different actions! It’s so hypocritical!

    WIY, I’m not talking about you because we cleared that up and if it would only be you I wouldn’t mention it.

    in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025735
    philosopher
    Member

    Moderator-80, thank you, thank you. I don’t understand why I’m being judged for something which should be self understood for every frum Yid.

    in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025732
    philosopher
    Member

    WIY, That’s exactly what I mean! When we are talking about tznius issues we are essentially saying the same thing as In fact many really nice and good people are doing it and I was wondering what the deal is and why people arent makpid on this.

    Only because tznius is ESSENTIAL to Yiddishkeit and wearing a hat and jacket is not, there is more of a stronger emphasis on the need for frum women to dress btznius. That’s all there is to it. Nobody is saying and I can’t say what others think but I don’t think, that pritzusdige women are not nice and good.

    in reply to: Excessive Spending #689866
    philosopher
    Member

    gavra, I have cotton gloves that I put polish on and then smear the polish on the silver.

    Which gloves are you refering to?

    in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025726
    philosopher
    Member

    I don’t believe in shouting rasha. Let’s remember when we discuss issues we are automatically judging a situation. It doesn’t mean we think of others as bad people.

    in reply to: Excessive Spending #689864
    philosopher
    Member

    Wolf, at least your wife is spared from polishing silver. It’s one of my least favorite household tasks. (Actually which household chore do I like to do?)

    in reply to: Excessive Spending #689859
    philosopher
    Member

    Excessive spending is really very individual.

    Some people go into debt with their excessive spending habits.

    Some people are so into shopping, their life revolves only around that and everything else becomes trivial.

    But we can’t judge excessive spending in general because what one considers a necessity s/o else can consider that a luxury.

    The bottom line is that someone shouldn’t spend more than there means, be so into attaining more materialism that they forget about their spirituality, or make untzniusdige simchos or build untziunsdige houses.

    in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025722
    philosopher
    Member

    The point is not to look down on others. I sense that you are condescending to those who arent up to your frumkeit standards. We cant judge others

    WIY, isn’t that statement a little hypocritical from someone who wrote:

    I find that as long as daddy is in Kollel he is all holy and the house is Torahdig but then once he leaves he drops in Ruchnius like a stone in water. What do you think that does to the family? They all drop with him. A non Kollel family doesnt have this phenomenon.

    And someone who opened a thread regarding those who do not wear hats or jackets during minchah?

    Fine, you don’t judge those who sin openly and consistently, but at least don’t be consistent and don’t judge ANYBODY, including me.

    We have to know what they do is wrong and educate our kids properly, but if we tell our kids, dont dress like that Jewish girl, shez a prutzah she dresses like a shiksa you have done more bad than good.

    Now what makes you think I ever said don’t dress like a particular girl, she’s pritzuh? Actually b”H I personally don’t live near pritzusdige women, none of my neighbors are pritzus, b”H for that, so I never said anything of the sort. Would I live in a neighborhood where pritzus in the norm I would tell my kids that we are very proud to adhere to halacha, we are not cheap, we respect ourselves and therefore we cover oursleves according to halacha. And even if there are frum people who don’t follow halacha that doesn’t mean it’s the right thing to do.

    Now if you don’t agree with my chinuch methods, I can’t help you, but I certainly will not come to you for chinuch advice.

    You have no right to look down on another yid, or to hate them in your heart for their lower level of frumkeit.

    As I repeat like a broken record, I look down on people’s openly, deliberately, and continously flouting of halachah. I never hate ANY human being, whether they are a non-Jew and especially if they are a Jew if they have not deliberately hurt anyone.

    in reply to: Excessive Spending #689855
    philosopher
    Member

    But being that the question is excessive spending, who cares if it is visible or not?

    Tznius means hidden, besheiden. A Yid has to live btznius in every aspect of his life.

    in reply to: Learning But Not Being Supported #690030
    philosopher
    Member

    WIY, isn’t that being a little too judgemental on all kollel yungerleit?

    in reply to: Learning But Not Being Supported #690023
    philosopher
    Member

    Hey, I just realized I wrote a Torah lifestyle is for those who can live it…

    I made a HUGE MISTAKE. I meant to write, a long term kollel lifestyle…

    in reply to: Physics – Relativity #790826
    philosopher
    Member

    Oh and before I sign off and go clean up the kitchen I want to apologize again to Mod-80 for thinking he wrote about “the deep theory end of the continuum of science”. I thought you wrote that because I had no idea what I wrote. I was probably in a rush then and when I came back I was like, hey I never wrote this, I have no idea what this means and I thought you put it in to clarify what I meant.

    So I went back to your post about the contuinuum in science (I’m not really sure how you use that word) and there was nothing about “the deep end of the continuum of science”.

    I must have come to a wrong scientific conclusion.

    🙂

    in reply to: Physics – Relativity #790825
    philosopher
    Member

    So bottom line is, in the continuum of space and time that is beyond our capabilities to reach, we cannot come to a definite, factual scientific conclusion.

    I just wanted to try out the word continuum.

    in reply to: Physics – Relativity #790824
    philosopher
    Member

    Can we arrive at definite scientific conclusions?

    I think only in the areas that we can physically reach today can we reach to scientific facts. Wherever we can get to whether it is in the deep depths of the ocean or in outer space by rocket and sattelite can we come to some understanding of real scientific facts based on our current capabilities.

    So whether it is proving scientifically what was earlier in time like the theory of evolution or what is in deep space where it is beyond our capabilities to reach by rocket or sattelite, or what will be in the future like predicting global warming is based in theory and the scientific community needs to come clean and admit that their so called facts are theories. They have no right to tout theories as facts.

    in reply to: What Does The Word Yishivish Mean? #689822
    philosopher
    Member

    Wolf, is today bash a wolf day?

    in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025712
    philosopher
    Member

    What does judging mean?

    Nobody’s saying that you can judge others by judging anything personal about a person who doesn’t dress b’tznius or otherwise. Nobody’s making judgements such as does her family dress that way or is it only her, why does she think she has the chutzpah dress that way, etc…

    One is allowed to make judgements of others as to how it would effect them. Can my kids play with the kids of someone who does abc or will it have a negative effect, etc.

    One can also say constuctive critism, provided that it’s valid.

    in reply to: Physics – Relativity #790823
    philosopher
    Member

    Oh and thanks Mod-80 for teaching me a new word: continuum. I’ve never heard of that word before.

    in reply to: Excessive Spending #689844
    philosopher
    Member

    Nobody was writing against snobby billionaires and their airplanes.

    But okay artchill, you don’t want any discussions about mansions and excessive spending. So tell me, how was your day today?

    in reply to: Physics – Relativity #790822
    philosopher
    Member

    Mod-80 maybe I did write deep theory end. I see that you never said that.

    Why do you call it deep theory or is it some type of technological term?

    in reply to: Learning But Not Being Supported #690017
    philosopher
    Member

    I meant to write such a life is not a chiuv for those who can’t…

    in reply to: Learning But Not Being Supported #690016
    philosopher
    Member

    myfreind, while a Torah lifestyle is a beautiful life for those who can live it, such a life is not a chiuv for those who can, because the Torah was not given to angels and we each have our own paths in avodas Hashem.

    One however, cannot expect a husband to simply ask a wife what is bothering her if he suspects that she is unhappy with her current lifestyle. If he needs to go out to work he’ll be unhappy. So it’s highly unlikely he’ll ask her what’s bothering her, especially if he knows what the answer will be. Whether it’s right or not the husband should be the one to initiate a conversation about this is beside the point. It’s unrealistic to expect that.

    If the wife or husband wants to discuss something, they need to be mature and start the discussion, not hope that their spouse will pick up on their unhappiness. Because chances are, they’re going to ignore it.

    in reply to: Questions About Menashe's Problem #693308
    philosopher
    Member

    Wolf, just checking up if everything’s ok . You seem to be in a very self critical mood today.

    in reply to: Learning But Not Being Supported #690006
    philosopher
    Member

    IIRC, lobbying isn’t about money (although it could be). Usually groups don’t lobby for money, but for favorable laws and/or policies (which may well lead to more money).

    If you look at the reasons why MOST lobyists lobby, you’ll see money is the bottom line. Whichever way you want to put it, that’s lobbying for money.

    in reply to: Physics – Relativity #790821
    philosopher
    Member

    Okay, thanks Mod, I don’t remember writing deep theory end so thanks for that. I think that sums it up very well : deep THEORY end of the continuum of science.

    ZachKessin, I think we are arguing about something we basically agree on with little differences. I wrote:

    I am not denying, if we peel away the scientific theories that scientists have, and look at the facts that are known today to us humans that there is indeed a lot of knowledge out there.

    What knowledge is based on facts and I agree with you that we know more today than we did years ago and in and the future we will expand on that knowledge.

    Let me explain what I meant with the following paragraph:

    However, I am assuming you agree with me that in 200 years hence there will be a lot of new information that will make the facts and theories and knowledge of our generation look like we were in the infant stage at best and foolish at worst.

    Just as in past generations people believed in foolish ideas for example idolatry and they backed it up with “scientific proofs” of their day and today we know that the sun is not a god or stone cannot be a god so too eventually the “scientific facts” and theories of this generation, for example the THEORY of evolution which is accepted as a fact in a lot of academic institutions and by scientits worldwide will be looked upon as foolish. I believe global warming will belong in the same foolish category.

    On the other hand, our knowledge of REAL SCIENTIFIC FACTS is just in the infant stage.

    I think we basically differ on the computor model issue. I do not believe computor models can give us facts when they are built on theories.

    As Moderator-80 wrote frequently there are widely differing and even opposite results depending on the assumptions made.

    A computor model cannot produce a realistic answer based on assumptions. It can only produce a realistic answer when the information provided for the model is factual, but I don’t know if scientists ever use computor models if they have ALL the relevent facts.

    Thanks again for the clear answer you posted yesterday on the topic of Dark Matter, Dark Energy and black holes. I really enjoyed reading that.

    in reply to: Physics – Relativity #790817
    philosopher
    Member

    Moderator-80, I am talking about the deep theory end of the continuum of science, not technology. Thanks for helping me clarify that.

    in reply to: Physics – Relativity #790815
    philosopher
    Member

    ZachKessin, I am not denying, if we peel away the scientific theories that scientists have, and look at the facts that are known today to us humans that there is indeed a lot of knowledge out there.

    However, I am assuming you agree with me that in 200 years hence there will be a lot of new information that will make the facts and theories and knowledge of our generation look like we were in the infant stage at best and foolish at worst.

    The knowledge that we know today is not even a drop in the bucket to the true reality out there.

    Maybe in fifty years I will ask you if you know the definite answer to what dark matter and dark energy is. Maybe by then numerous facts will have been disproven so why would I bother to learn intensively about this subject? Especially since I would have to use math which is a subject I prefer to stay away from with a ten foot pole.

    Moshiach will hopefully be here sooner than that and then we won’t have to wait that long for scientific answers and the truth will be revealed to us.

    in reply to: Physics – Relativity #790813
    philosopher
    Member

    But here is the key point those models must predict reality in a useful way

    They must predict because the scientists want to, but they absolutely CANNOT predict reality.

    in reply to: Physics – Relativity #790810
    philosopher
    Member

    charliehall, there ARE scientists who do not agree that there is a long term climate change. The climate changes all the time. I highly doubt the our plannet’s climate is the same as it was at the begining of creation.

    Solar energy is currently not economically competitive with oil, gas, coal, or nuclear without massive government subsidies

    The gov. has expensive safety and environment requirements for new buildings and houses. There is no reason that the government can’t require solar panels that are already on the market the as one of the new requirements for new buildings and houses. The cost of these panels are a few thousand dollars, as much as a new bathroom.

    Also in the auto industry, just as the government has safety and environment requirements they also need to have requirements that new cars, say in 15 years, need to be powered at least %40 by solar energy and the milage per gallon of gas needs to increase. I think that’s a very viable option.

    But I don’t think it will happen because of all the lobbying that will result would the gov. put forth such a plan.

    in reply to: Learning But Not Being Supported #689987
    philosopher
    Member

    Philosopher, your comments are really ironic “Middle classes gets squeezed so lets keep people on social services.” Um, that’s backwards. REDUCE government spending (and social programs is just one area) and taxes will go down. The money has to come from somewhere.

    SJS, I agree one million percent with your idea that REDUCE government spending (and social programs is just one area) and taxes will go down However that AINT’ gonna happen. America is rotten to the core.

    That’s why you’ve got millions of illegals, millions of African Americans, maybe millions of white Americans or at least hundreds of thousands and millions of Spanish benefitting from programs even though it chokes the hardworking (I’m not saying those that are on these social programs are not hardworking) middle class who pay for all of this (the rich also do, but it doesn’t choke them) and the government doesn’t give a hoot, since the politicians themselves are dependent on such a system for their political carrer, it won’t change.

    Because of this reality, I fargin those frum Jews who do benefit from this system, especially if would there be no frum Jews who benefit from these programs my taxes wouldn’t get lowered by a half a penny.

    in reply to: Learning But Not Being Supported #689985
    philosopher
    Member

    Is it 3500 – 4000 PER child for someone with 6 tuition aged children? What part of the US do you live? (I assume you are in the US.)

    Missme your assumption that I can get an pay lower schar limud based on the number of children I have in mosdos isn’t correct.

    First of all, assuming I have six kids, one of them is still a baby. Second of all, if I would only have boys it is very likely that one would already be in yeshiva or going into Yeshiva so that makes it four in one cheder. But it is highly likely that I would have daughters as well so that makes it less children in cheder as my daughters attend school. Therefore I wouldn’t qualify for a discount, unless all I only had daughters which isn’t the case.

    Most people do pay between $3,500 and upwards in Chassidishe mosdos. I would assume Satmar in Brooklyn is the only mosdos that charges less.

    in reply to: Physics – Relativity #790802
    philosopher
    Member

    although it is a wonder that Mexico remains friendly given the racist bigotry against Mexican immigrants to the US

    Huh? Free emergency room medical care, free schooling for their kids, free social benefits do not exactly translate into bigotry for me.

    Of course the gov. is somewhat trying (ahem) to keep ALL of them out, otherwise our economy will collapse yesterday.

    in reply to: Physics – Relativity #790799
    philosopher
    Member

    I don’t understand why the government cannot do something constuctive and make the industries incorporate SOLAR ENERGY!

    Solar energy leaves no carbon footprints!

    in reply to: Physics – Relativity #790797
    philosopher
    Member

    Mod-80, thank you very much. I am amazed at this “herd mentality” of humans to follow whatever thought is popular at the time and to see that as fact. I admire those who think for themselves.

    The only proof they can provide of this complex hypothesis is by running it in climate computer models

    Computor models are favorites of these “scientists” who prove their facts with very “convincing” evidence that are nothing more than computor models. Whether they want to prove the global warming THEORY or the evolution THEORY they resort to these computor models to give their THEORIES wieght. Before that, the evolutionists resorted to well sketched images of how single celled creatures turned into fish, fish into mammals and one of those mammals, the ape turned human. They also sketched how the first apes must have looked and the slow evolution of those apes into humans. Wow, what scientific evidence. I’m really blown away.

    Our governments on all levels are considering taxing the use of fossil fuels.

    The government taxing us yet again? So what else is new?

    in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025703
    philosopher
    Member

    Kasha, right on!

    in reply to: Physics – Relativity #790791
    philosopher
    Member

    ZachKessin, thanks. Wow! That sounds like a great mystery!

    The wonders of Hashem’s creation, the power and vast greatness that I can barely fathom never ceases to amaze me!

    Mah rabi maasecha Hashem kilom bchochma asisah…

    in reply to: Breach in Tznius: Recent affliction attacking Klal Yisroel #1025701
    philosopher
    Member

    WIY, maybe you are not judging those who are sinning but you are certainly judging those who are concerned about chillul Hashem!

    Don’t you think we should not be focused only on not upsetting people and start thinking about not upsetting the Aibishter? How do you think Hashem “feels” (no He doesn’t feel) when He sees His daughters in skimpy clothing, their knees and thighs getting uncovered with every slight movement, tight clothing hugging their bodies, looking like the cheap nochrim?

    Do you think He has nachas from that?

    I don’t remember where I heard this but if one is not sure whether their action is a mitzvah or aveirah they should look at the outcome of their action.

    If there will be no change because people will feel judged that they are judging not tzniusdige women and won’t take action because of that then how do you think the next generation of Yiddishe girls will look like if their mothers don’t impart this very vital mitzvah of tznius?

    Tznius is the FOUNDATION of a holy nation.

    in reply to: Physics – Relativity #790789
    philosopher
    Member

    Is dark matter and dark energy the same as black holes in space that pulls in matter and makes it dissapear?

    in reply to: Learning But Not Being Supported #689963
    philosopher
    Member

    Is it 3500 – 4000 PER child for someone with 6 tuition aged children?

    Approximately that amount of kids b”H. Figure one more or one less. (I’m trying to stay anonymous, LOL.)

    in reply to: Learning But Not Being Supported #689962
    philosopher
    Member

    charliehall, taxes become theft when the government takes more than one can afford to give for people benefits that people should not be getting.

    Sorry illegals should not be getting benefits. And since so many illegals are having kids that are on benefits and in public schools and were paying for them, the government needs to fix that. Now while their paying for MILLIONS of these people, those few thousand frum peple should benefit from this as well.

    Sooner or later this socialist system will collapse anyway.

    in reply to: Learning But Not Being Supported #689960
    philosopher
    Member

    What is “MOFES”?

    MOFES is the unMOFES that will put America in der erd, but it’s still a mofes for those who get it till Americas gets there.

    MOFES is medicaid, food stamps and section eight.

    in reply to: Physics – Relativity #790788
    philosopher
    Member

    charliehall, there are scientists who disagree with the global warming THEORY. In addition, the Earth continuously changes tempurature and there is absolutely no guarantee that the Earth will continue getting warmer. It is PURELY speculation.

    Also how much warmer is the Earth’s temperature today than 1880? I hardly think the instruments were as accurate then as today in measuring the tempurature and that could be the reason why there could be this slightly variable temperatures. There were no sattelites then to measure THE ENTIRE Earth’s temperature.

    And anyone who rejects scientific facts has nothing to add to scientific discussions

    Sorry I can’t google on my computer, but maybe you can. I’m sure you’ll find plenty of scientists with scientific facts proving that global warming is a sham.

    in reply to: Learning But Not Being Supported #689957
    philosopher
    Member

    In chasidish schools standard tuition is often about 2000 per child.

    Not where I live.

    Where I live the average is $3,500 to $4,000 per child.

    in reply to: Learning But Not Being Supported #689956
    philosopher
    Member

    My husband was in kolel for three years. We didn’t recieve any support and I was the one bringing in the income. We could’ve done this another two years but my husband had pressure to go into the family business.

    Now after a few more kids b”H, I don’t see how we would make it if my husband would be in kollel.

    But the truth is middle income people barely make it and it might just be easier if my husband would have been in kollel and we got food stamps, medicaid and section eight, because the taxes are outrages. Also these low income people get HUGE tax returns.

    I actually encouraged my freind not to take on a higher paying job because she would barely be able to live if she would lose her benefits.

    I don’t consider it taking charity because the government literally steals the money from middle income people. Between the crazy property taxes, income taxes, taxes on investments that also have expenses so you actually end up LOSING money, forget it.

    I used to be upset at the people who took MOFES but today my outlook has changed. The government takes huge chuncks off the middle income people and is chocking us, so I say if you can’t beat ’em, join ’em. Get your MOFES if you LEGALY of course, could.

Viewing 50 posts - 151 through 200 (of 582 total)