Chaim87

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 50 posts - 51 through 100 (of 214 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Is TAG (Technology Awareness Group) a not-for-profit business? #2340259
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @Avram in MD,
    “You do not “need” a smartphone in the same sense that you need food”
    Incorrect I need it for my parnsa and wouldn’t have food without it. Its also pretty much a necessity in the modern world. I get that many jews live without it. I respect them for that. But relaize that its a little like telling someone you do not need electricty because you can live like the amish. Society is kind of past that. Go outside the frum world and you’ll see just how much people use it. But I am not here to debate this issue so much.

    ” If you purchase a problematic device, then it’s up to you to make it safer.”
    Umm I am not yet convinced that I need a filter to keep it safer. I can use childlocks etc. You are telling me from a religious point of view that i need one. OK but then offer it for free because I am just not such a deep believer in the cause. Unless you don’t care about getting us less believers to filter.

    Re “They kvetch, but they still buy eggs” yes but when not sold on the idea of TAG they won’t buy a filter. And no I am not unque in the idea of just not wanting to pay for things. I hear that in the street and all over. Free is free no matter how lavish i live.

    Yes I feel resentment when an organization thats a tzedaka and here to help the klal charges . You got it. Mnay can afford bikur cholim and don’t need their free meals in hopsitals. But its off put to charge us even if I can afford it. And guess what I swipe my card when i take a nice hot meal from them. Id do the same for TAG too. But don’t charge me.

    Same with your excuse that time is money. Cmon you are a tazdaka . Thats what tzedka does. You give free time to others. I do that as a chesed too. Otherwise what makes you a “tzeadka” that I should donate to? (To be cheap on one time $20?)

    Bottom line, I have a hunch you work for TAG. But it all boils down to the same thing. I and many resent the fact that you charge. We aren’t sold that all filters are needed. We think you are out to get our money when you nickle and dime (like charging $20 for two minutes of work to block texts on a flip phone). We think its a chutzpah to call yourslef a “non profit” when all you do is charge us money. Its not just me who feel this way. Its many many more than you think. All your argumets boil down to this idea that you are not obligated to give free things and why should you differ than a for profit business? But they all ignore the basic idea that its just “klein kepadik”, small minded. Its 2024 and there is so much money for everything. You can easily afford to provide free filters to all even via 3rd party vendors that by now you own or are well connected with. Its doable in 2024. This isn’t 1970. And Many just will never have respect for a “non profit” that nickles and dimes. (As I noted you’d be able fund raise alot more if you just gave it all for free).

    in reply to: IDF’s New Haredi Division #2340149
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @Always_Ask_Questions:
    Once you go that route the list gets beyond huge. I mean you really think R Herzog, the next cheif rabbi after R Kook zl was also a CVS a kofer? Look at how much torah he learned. look at how many jews he saved during the war. Then there are all the talmidm of R Kook ZL like the nazir and R isser Zkaman Meltzer’s son. R isser zalman himself was very close to R kook. This list of chashuva mizrachi rabbonim who even most tratitonal charedim won’t call a kofer is huge. But my point is even many rabbonim who we’d consider charedi or accepted in Charedi circles were pro Zionist. The idea that we must follow the shlosh shevous was refuted in many sefarim.. Firstly its an aggadta and our mesora is not to pasken like an agaddta. Secondly, the 3 shavous is only if the goyim keep their deal and don’t start up with jews. There are other refutations too.

    But the key point is many charedi leaders held of Zionism. Our torah is not in conflict with Zionism according to many. However it is in conflict with secularism. And so being opposed to the current state of Israel because its secular is pretty much the viewpoint of all frum jews. How to deal with that is the big question. And should we try to find a frum path or charedi path that shields us within the system (even in the army) so we aren’t influenced? Those are fair debates within the debate of secularism.

    in reply to: Is TAG (Technology Awareness Group) a not-for-profit business? #2340001
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @Avram in MD

    Sorry but I need a smart phone and computer. Its 2024 and we just have needs. I work and have other reasons.

    Re “And these people are not going to be convinced to shlep over to TAG to make their $1000 iPhone less convenient whether or not you waive the $60 filtering fee. ” yes they will and I am one of those people. People just don’t like paying for things. Just like i know people driving around in $800 a month leased cars kvetching about high eggs prices. Furthermore, its a feeling and resentment people get that TAG and others are just out for the money. I happen to not think that. I think they mean well. But I still ressent that they charge. Its just not what someone promoting filters should be doing. It makes me look down on them. People like freebies. If you want people to listten don;t charge.
    Side note, there are people like me that buy cheap devices too. (used iphones or cheaper smart phones and other devices). Filters end of costing more than the device. I also don’t apprecaite that its $20 to block texts on my flip phone. Stop nicling and dimming. Its very off put.

    in reply to: IDF’s New Haredi Division #2339824
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @somejewiknow

    There are tons of sefarim. Read the rziyna sefarim. And torah works isn;t the deciding factor. Actions are. Facts are they openly said they support zionsim and freed tish on yom hatzmot. (Same with punvitch). If I listed sefarim you’d mach that avek too. But there are plenty . you just refuse to look at them,
    Here is one published sefer which I gurantee you will mach avek like you always do because you are one sided.

    Rabbi Yaakov Friedman, the third Husiatyn Rebbe and a great-grandson of Rabbi Yisrael of Ruzhin, was a passionate Religious Zionist. He actively supported the Mizrachi movement and moved with his family to Israel in 1937. Many of his sermons in support of Religious Zionism, delivered between 1937 and 1956 in Tel Aviv, are collected in his sefer “Ohalei Yaakov.”

    There are mnay more sefarim but you can’t deny actions either. Its not just about whats written. its how people acted. facts are a reba fered tish yom hatzmt. Facts are punvithca rav had all these kneset members by his ground breaking. facts are R Shraga feivel made a bracha for the medina. Facts are R Wolfson ZL said the 6 day war was a nes. i heard it from the tzadiiks mouth. You have excuses galore. Because you are a hothead where only one side is right. Its not a good midah. There are mnay ways to torah.

    in reply to: Is TAG (Technology Awareness Group) a not-for-profit business? #2339682
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @[email protected]

    I think thats a bit misleading. Tag does have cetrain filters. And for those they don’t have they have very strong connections to companies that have those filters. its not like they have no shyachis. They send all their clients there and there is overlap. Its not completely independent even tough on the books it is.

    To your other point about what TAG is. The point of TAG is to promote filters and ensure people use smart phones and other technology “smartly” and ehrlich. If they can’t offer free filters then they are a wasted organziation . Its the basic elementray idea of technology awareness. In todays modern times when there is so much money fundrasied for everything, TAG needs to expand and do the same. This game of promoting awareness but not prviding the full service is just disingenous. and white washing. Get your act together and fundraise more. (BMG raises KYA like $80M a year for aderi torah. A wonderful cause. BH there is alot of money out there)

    Side note, I am not convinced that if you offered the servivce but highly encouraged people to pay the $20 a month for the cost that most wouldn’t do that. You’d only need to increase your budget by a little bit. Furthermore, me and others would donate more when you do fundraise because the cause now makes more sense than “just pormoting awareness”. I speak not just for myself but the tone in the street.

    in reply to: IDF’s New Haredi Division #2339668
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @somejewiknow;
    Furthermore on top of Rizyn,

    We know R isser Zalman supported the medina. His son took over Hesder after R kook Zl R tzvi pesach Frank as well as the tzitz elizer.

    R Shraga Feviel mendlovithc made a bracha when the state was foudned. As per an eyewitness. yes Stamar reba was upset at that but he made that bracha.

    First year of the statehood Punvitcha rav said hallel yom hatzmut. And they still raise the flag every year. in the groundbreaking cermeony in 1952 where the chazon ish attended many leadig kennest member’s were present. In fact there wre patchkavialln all ove rmeah sheraim against him. for that. Yes you can wash this all up and say hey the punitcha rav was just a politician. But if its all total kefira why go to such an extent like he did? I don’t think it would have been Ok for him to invite leading kofrim like reform rabbis. So why is zionsits different?

    I heard from R Moshe wolfson ZL that 1948 was an eis rotozn for moshiach. nebach we weren’t zochah so instead we got “shiveri kelim” the medina. He also gave us a whole shuir how in 1967 the six day war was a miracle. Again very much not in the spirt of zionsim as kefira.

    There are tons of pro zionsit sefraim out there too. Again don’t conflate zionsim with secularism. Zionisim has strong fondations in our torah. Secular zionsim has no place

    in reply to: IDF’s New Haredi Division #2339667
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @somejewiknow;
    The Avir Yakov fered tish on tom hatmzut as per eyewitness testimony.
    The Shtefenshta Reba (Rebbe of skulen and Ribnitz) has a picture of Herzel in his study and was open about zionsim.
    Bohusha Rebbe was part of the mizrachi movement and openly supported them.
    The other sadiguyra rebbes were openly supportive of the medina as well..

    This is all well known if you don’t live in a cave. There are also plenty of pro zionsim sefarim too. No its not kefira unless you are narrow minded.

    in reply to: IDF’s New Haredi Division #2339355
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @somejewiknow
    There are tons of sefarim that are pro Zionism. You just don’t read it . Bpashtis the whole chovevi Zion movement was that. Again don’t confuse Zionism with secularism . In most of the anti R Kook and Chazon ish it’s about secularism. That’s different than opposition. To Zionism.

    I’ll repeat it again and keep it simple. Make believe I am a rizyna chusid . Is that anti Torah ? Yes or no? Just answer that question.

    in reply to: Is TAG (Technology Awareness Group) a not-for-profit business? #2339354
    Chaim87
    Participant

    At the end of the day TAG thinks they are like a hashgacha that we all accept we pay for. But the population isn’t sold on that yet. They can take the high road and convince themselves. Or they can wake up and realize that if you want people to listen to the Rav don’t charge . Strongly suggest a donation and most will give. You’ll also be more accepted as a tzedaka when you fundraise if filters are free. There is so much money for everything under the sun. Sweat a little more, raise a little more money and give out free filters so it’s truly a tzedaka

    in reply to: IDF’s New Haredi Division #2339214
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @somejewiknow:
    The Imeri emes never said its kefira. he said it comes from to much of love for other jews and its wrong. Kefira is a strong word.
    The fact that many gedolim held R Kook in high esteem even when disagreeing with him in principal proves its not kefira.

    Now to your other point which is a complete total lie that you made up. Yes its a satmar idea that the torah rejects zionism. Most Aguda gedolim including the imeri emes held of zionism and yes published ideas about it. The objection was mostly against SECURLAISM. You keep on confusing the two things and just repeat the same untruths. Let me be cllear:
    1) Zionism: is the idea that jews should have a state in israel before moshiach. Not one word of oppostion of that idea from many mnay leading gedolim.
    2) Secularism: The idea that the state will be secular and our torah CVS will be diminished. Almost all rabbonim excpet R Kook ZL held we most vehemently oppose that. Its a different fight. Secularism is indeed a clear conflict with our torah.

    Now to the gedolim that held of zionsim. Lets start with almost all Rizyhna rebas. Are they all kofrim? (I’ll move in to others after). Lets say I am rizyna. Am I kofer now?

    in reply to: Is TAG (Technology Awareness Group) a not-for-profit business? #2339211
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @DaasYochid .

    Sorry but you can’t compare TAG to yeshivas and shuls. Its a poor analogy for many reasons. For starters, whether you like it or not people aren’t yet convinced that you need filters. And by charging them you won’t get them to do it. Secondly, in fact most shuls and yeshivas indeed have a system where people who totally ca’t afford it get off easy or a discounted price. Why can’t TAG offer that? Its not like food because selling food isn’t charity. You are charity . Selloing food isn’t inhernetly a holy thing promoting judaism. And in fact there are a ton of frum organztaions offering free or hevaily discountede food to those that can’t afford it. Again TAG should do the same. Bottom line, yes many relaize that its a given like the pirce of a hashgacha that we all pay for. But there are more than you think who don’t see filters as a must yet. They see it as an extra thng that’s nice to do if easy. You may disagree with that mindset. But that’s how they see it. And if you want them to “eat kosher” via filters and you are a tzadka stop charging. You also collect money for this mosad. What else should it be for other than free or cheaper filters?

    in reply to: The Good Biden Has Done #2338802
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @yechiell
    1) The American Recovery Act, increased our deficit by $1.9T and resulted in Inlfation. Our dirt responders would not have been laid off widescale to justify that. There was tons of waste and abuse in ?that spending too. (To be fair, Trump is just as guilty if not more for Inflation but it doesn’t give Biden a Hail pass)
    2) Bipartisan Infrastructure Act: Please point me to significnat roads that were really rebuilt. I want to see these ew big projects. And at what cost? It costs billions just to repave a road The govt is full of waste and these things are pure nonsense flushing money down to the toilet. Gone are the days when visionaries like Robert Moses, actually built highways and bridges. That’s long gone. These “infrastructure” bills are loaded with garbage.
    3)The Inflation Reduction Act: That did not cut inflation. Again baloney. You know what brought inflation down? The feds increasing rates. Once again Trump is nuts for criticizing the feds and has inkling about Finance and the economy. BH Powell’s soft landing learning from Volcker did it. But Biden did nothing.
    4) Climate change? You believe in that Hoax? Please prove that its man made or that more storms really arise from it. Yes we can prove the climate is warmer. But we have no clue why its warmer or that its really harmful. Those are all theories. Voddo Sceince. Now Ill concede that at the end of the day, storms do cause damage and its a good thing to protect homes from storm damage and to protect our water. But stop it with this climate change hoax.
    5) pro union: so why did the unions turn on Biden?

    Let me finish by saying that yes overall biden wasn’t as bad as the world makes him. I think he was slow to adress inflation . The same with supply shortages where even when warned beforehand he ignored the science . (He was told that a heavy flu season would hit the USA in the winter of 2022 -23 yet we had medicne shortages all over). But Biden was OK and didn’t cause much harm either. i also respect and criticize him for Israel. I respect that he stood generally very strong with israel. But blame him for slowing them down in Gaza and giving credence to the Palestinian Humanitarian cause too much. That harms israel. I also give him credit for the Hezbollah ceasefire. Altough there again, he prevented Israel for months form doing what it wanted to do there. And the ceasefire is partly because Hezbollah is scared of trump after he won. This is why Hamas is back at the table too.

    And so all considering Biden wasn’t bad but not great either. We owe him a thanks for the things he did do for us including Israel. But Trump seems to be far better when it comes to israel. Thats our #1 issue. (Re The economy I am not so sure Trump’s extremist ideas are great. But Biden wasn’t great either)

    in reply to: Is TAG (Technology Awareness Group) a not-for-profit business? #2338792
    Chaim87
    Participant

    Thanks for reviving this post. Its been bothering me too. TAG is connected to filter companies. Call it a 3rd party or call it their own. At this point its one huge operation. If you want people to get filters why do you charge me per month to filter my computer Some of us just have 5 devices and can’t afford $100 a month for filters. And then we constantly switch devices, get new ones etc. I understand because it costs you money. But thats what your mosod is about. Its about promoting filters. You don’t do that by charging. Does Hatzalah charge for their services? Why can’t you install filters even with 3rd party vendors for free and say the suggested donation is $X (I don’t know say $20 a month). We ask that if you can donate to please do so. They’d recoup some of the losses that way. I mean TAG does fundraise. Yes this will increase your budget but it will also increase filters in klal yisroel. isn’t that your goal?

    Also don’t take it for granted that everyone follows the rav and is deadset on filters. There are communities where its emphasized less. And even where its a strong point, you’ll be surprised how many people whitewash it. This isnt to minmiize its urgency. But its to say if you truly want people to obtian filters why make obstacles?

    in reply to: IDF’s New Haredi Division #2338753
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @HaKatan: I should say I read the Imeri emes letter and
    1) he is only upset at R Kook for being “mischaber with Reshaim” who are ant torah. He doesn’t say one word against zionsim. And this dsicusion is about zionsim.
    2) He is still very respectful and holds him in the highest esteem as seen in the letter. he says its because of his tremendous ahavas yisroel.

    Repeating my main point, lets call me a riztna chusid . Am I kofer because I don’t hold of Satmar?

    in reply to: IDF’s New Haredi Division #2338744
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @HaKatan: Its not “people” who were zionists. Irs gedolim that were zionsits. The “people” followed the gedolim. Who says Satmar Rav or Brisk was the only gadol. Should I relist the gedolim who supported zionsim. Lets start with all the rizyna rebas. If you’d like call me a rizyna chusid. Am i Kofer now? Yes or no?

    Re R Elishyav : I told you already. You mix up two things. Zionism and secularism. His alleged issue with the WZO was because its secular and not just the torah. The fact that he worked for the state tells you he isn’t anti zionsim as long as its torahdik. (His work was in torah)

    If its so easy to find these letters against R Kook then go find them. Are you shy? And like I said its doesn’t prove he dodn’t hold of R Kook in pricnpial. He didn’t hold of R Kook being so mushy with secular anti torah. Again the issue wasn’t zionism. I challnege you to walk in to Ger or R Shual Alter and ask them.

    But lets circle back to my main point. Lets say I am a rizyna chusid. Am I kofer now for believing in my “reba” who held of zionsim ? yes or no will suffice. (Oh only Satmar & Brisk is correct and noone else matter)

    in reply to: IDF’s New Haredi Division #2338382
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @Always_Ask_Questions,

    The fact that R Moshe zl was good friends with R JB zl is the point I am making too. Its because R moshe may have disagreed with R JB but he still held that R JB’s views are not kefira. R Moshe wasn’t respectufl of Sol Liberman even though he was a goan too. And so I can’t believe that so many gedolim were “repsectful” of R kook yet held its kefira.. And if it sin’t kefira who says its wrong. Both are torah views.

    in reply to: IDF’s New Haredi Division #2338364
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @Always_Ask_Questions

    From the way so many people were yonek from R Kook it would seem like it was more than just respect. I mean we know R isser zalman, the nazir, R elishayv , R shloma zalman seemed to be more than just respecting him. The Chafetz chaim also perosnally asked r Kook to review his work after his shver the adres was nifter. is that just respect?

    Now I’ll conceed that with R Kook there was another issue. And this is where people mix things up. The issue is How much do you cooperate, tolerate etc “secularism”. The Zionists at the time were looking to uproot judisam (unlike those of today) in an extreme fashion. They wnate dveryone to be mamesh mechalal shabbos and secular. The kibbutzim were terrible etc. How much do you tolerate that. R Kook Zl was extreme in his ahavas yisroel and loved them too much. This is where Ger and other holy jews disagreed with R Kook. And so it wasn’t just public display. I was they held he was holy and right about zionsim . But they disagreed on this one issue.

    That brings me to my key point which is what this post section is supposed to be about. There are two issues
    1) Zionsim
    2) Secularism
    Many who opposed R Kook like perhaps Ger were because they were trying to fight secularism. However, the idea of zionism and taking back our land in a peaceful manner where we as jews run the govt and own the land, was alwatys a very popular outcry and many gedolim held of that. Now fast foward to the post medina era, where the IDF is here not to conquer more land but to protect us so we don’t get killed while preserving our land and keeping jews in charge of Israel. If we ignore the secular threat, many prior gedolim would have no issue with fighting to perseve the status quo. Zionism itself is a noble cause accodring to many. Now you’ll ask but what about the shamd and secualrism? Well lets see perhaps there is a way to create space where now in the IDF there is no shmad llike Hesder does. I can hear two sides on that too. But to repeat, its an issue about secualrism not zionsim who many many big gedolim held of

    in reply to: IDF’s New Haredi Division #2338347
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @HaKatan
    I have no clue how old you are but speak to wise people over 80 and ask them what it was like 60 years ago. How they felt about zionism? It was much more pro Israel in charedi circles.

    You can’t count what Satmar wrote because we agree on that. My argument is that he wasn’t the only gadol and bug gedolim disagreed. You also can’t count Brisk. We agree on that but many other disagreed. Same with the minchas eluzer.

    Ger may have wrote certain sharp things in public letters. Altough I question that and would love for you to find me a link to that. However, facts are that overall, Ger was very pro zionsim and r kook. Ask any gera chusid. Again certain things were written against the ideo of coppearing with secularism but thats not zionism.

    Re lubavtich yes them and belz were anti zionism. However, look at both today who changed views. So its not so clear cut.

    You say people were “confused” about zionsim. That’s called revsinbg hisotry. When people don’t agree with your view they are “confused”. Oh I get it only your way is right.

    Bototm line you fail to deny that all the rzyna rebas were pro zionsim. Why is that a nothing? R isser Zalman, the nazir, R Tzvi pesach frank, R shloma zalman and R elishyav etc all nothing? R Shraga feivel zl made a bracha when the medina was founded. (A fact I heard form eye witnesses). All is nothing. You keep on repeating the same few gedolim. OK You have a few big ones . But I also have a few big ones. Almost all rizyna rebas were pro zionists Should i repeat that again?)

    in reply to: IDF’s New Haredi Division #2337939
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @Participant,

    This was a gathering about issues pertaining to Judaism. And R Kook was an issue. It wouldn’t be loshon hara if R kook wasn’t holy. Its also well known that he tried to make shalom between R Kook and R Y Chaim Sonnenfeld. The Adreres said that reason he neeve rmade it to EY was because had he made it there would have been shalom and moshiach would have come. And it wasn’t the time for moshiach. I heard this from a chshuva rav. That doesn’t sound like just being frum on L Hara. And R Kook helped the C chaim write his sefarim sof ymov too.


    @HaKatan
    : Politcally powerful?? Thats white washing. Gedolim stood up to ben gurion Yimach shimo but couldn’t stand up to R Kook? Furthermore, R isser zalman meltzer, R frank, Tiitz elizer, the nazir, R elayshiv, R shloma zalamn all held of him. I know you’ll find excuses and answer each one. But gimme a break just admit that torah has many ways and both sides are holy. Re the chaftez chaim story wlaking out, sorry but there are more sources than just R Kook son. he walked out in front of 100’s of people. You can’t make that up. Sure R elchanon and the satmar reba were against him. Nobody denies that there are two sides. Both are holy.

    We also have all the holy rizyna rebas including the skulena and Ribnityza reba rebbe the shetfenshta who held of zionsim. The aver yakov fehred tsih on yom hatzmust. Go deny that.

    Lastly, the majority of jews held of zionsim way back in Europe already. This is a known fact for anyone who doesn’t try to drei akup and revise hisotry to a narrow minded kannosihakit. Just to repeat again they rejected secularism. Henceforth were things get gray. is it zionsim or secularism that peop[le are against? As time evolved the issue becomes secularism.

    in reply to: IDF’s New Haredi Division #2337936
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @HaKatan
    What you wrote about the chafetz chaim is just false. Your argument is because anyone who reads his work can see he said things that were blasphemous. Firstly that doesn’t prove the chafetz chaim didn’t hold of him. You completely made that up with no proof. I do have proof . There were 100’s of witnesses at the kensia where the chaftez chaim walked out of when a speaker bashmutzed R kook. Its very well documented and its FACT. We also know the R Kook helped the chafetz chaim write his seforim after his father-in-law teh aderes was nifter. Again a FACt.
    Next re Ger. I can’t talk to a letter he signed. Firstly did you see the signature or its rumor? lets say its true. Noone is saying that he hold sof everything he did to the T. Overall theyt hold of him termendously. All you have to do is ask anyone in GER what they hold of R kook’s seforim and the man. He is till today a kodosh in ger. Go walk in and ask.

    Your problem is a you formulate a theory based on narrow minded view that only one way in torah is correct. And when you hear that maybe tzadkim held of him you mach it avek that only your way can be true. The revisionist hisotry of today is sad. The 1930’s -1950’s were very different than you envsion with a good chunk of leading gedolim pro zionsim. (No I am not narrow minded. Yes the holy satmar reba and brisker rav plus many yerushlami gedolim were against it. But others disagreed)

    in reply to: IDF’s New Haredi Division #2337029
    Chaim87
    Participant

    HaKatan
    All the other gedolim did not condemn R Kook. This is revisionist fake news . The chafetz Chaim held of him , as did R isser zalman , R Frank , the Nazir, imeri emes, Rizyna Rebas , R Elishyav etc.

    I don’t think R kook zl would have held that if attacked you shouldn’t fight back . No one in Israel took things by force. That’s another made up thing.

    Now I’ll concede, most gedolim wouldn’t hold of the IDF because of its secular nature. But not because of Zionist ideology. (Of course the Satmar Reba and many holy yerushalmi gedolim were against that too) But the question arises what if you could create a non secular branch that the seculars really don’t mix in or try to make less torahdik. Then it stays at the pure Zionist aspect. There many many big gedolim held of that in the past

    in reply to: IDF’s New Haredi Division #2336929
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @somejewiknow
    Its a documented fact that tge Chafetz chaim held R Kook Zl in high esteem and walked out in front of hundreds of people when R Kook was bashhmutzed at a big convention. What’s not documented is the kook shmook line that he never said. R Kook evne helped the chaftez chaim write seforim after his shver the aderes was nifter. I told you that R Isser Zalman held of it as did R tzvi pesach Frank and many other gedolim. You live in a bubble who refuses to believe there are two sides. There are plnety of teshuvas pro fighting in the army but you’ll mach them avek saying they weren’t geolim and only your were. Its fake jusidam, You live in a shell of lies. The truth is both are holy views. And we all know R Aron Lieb Steinman was Ok with the army too. Till he got bullied he allowed nachal charedi. This is all balony.

    in reply to: IDF’s New Haredi Division #2336731
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @somejewiknow,
    False not all gedolim banned joining the army. Many permitted it. The bies Yisroel at times had chasdim in the army. R Kook who was held in high esteem held of fighting for a state. And R isser zalman , R frank , tzitz elizer and riyzhina rebas It’s NOT clear that one can’t support or work for the Zionist state. In fact R elashyiv zl worked for them. Some gedolim held like you but others disagreed. Please refrain from repeating this things. Oh and please don’t revise history either .

    in reply to: A lot of DL Bashing Charedim Lately #2335488
    Chaim87
    Participant

    There is no question that in terms of ehrlichkit many of the hesder boys are just as ehrlich and torahdik as ponvitch. Its simply ignoring the facts if you say otherwise. Now there are fair questions such as

    1) Is torah protecting us and maybe its wrong for charedim who are learning fight at all? Or maybe the Hesder approach of mixing the two is correct. Both sides are torhadik views.
    2) What about the securlairm of the army? Hesder boys have a strong system and upbringing that enables them to insulate in the army without being affected. Can charedim do the same? They don’t have that kind of background nor do they really have a system set up in the army like hesder. They also won’t be sedning the strong leraning boys to the army and only the “weaker” boys will go
    3) What about the chasdim? You can’t set up a system in the army that satisfies all of Ger’s takunas etc.

    Then there is the ideology.
    1) Is zionism and the idea of jews having a state against the torah and its views? Sure there is a list of gedolim and tzadkim who were anti zionism albiet mostly hungarian jews and a minor few ltifish like Briska rav and R Elchnonon. But then there were just a ton of rabbonim (too many too list) who were Ok with zionism too. Mizrachi was even initally part of agudah. So both are the torah view
    2) After 1948 and the medina was founded. Now the question of whether we should have a country is no longer a question. Now its how do we deal with the secular threat since its a secular state. Here you now have an interesting turn. Big rebas like R Arela Blezer and the lubvatcha rebas who were previously very against the idea of a statehood now said this is the reality lets be part of it once its here. Meanwhile other rebas who were perhaps more zionistic like the rizyna rebas moved towards the “right” realzing that yes we should be part of the govt but at the same time now its no longer a question of “joining up” with them for the ideal of a state. We got the state and we will be thankful but now we have to watch our from secularism.

    And thus its two distinct question. Jews having their own statehood many gedolim held yes. Now how about the secular threat? Thats where charedim and hesder went differnet ways on how to build those walls. But again both follow our torah

    in reply to: You wanted an insane dictator? You got him! #2334708
    Chaim87
    Participant

    Lets look at the trump apointees and see if its good for Israel. Huckabbee and Stefanik and Rubio . keep the list coming. Trump is a maddog and not who I’d Idiolize but right now he is my mad dog

    in reply to: A lot of DL Bashing Charedim Lately #2334657
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @ModernChassid

    I think one can equate modern day DL who is very frum and keep halacha to how many many holy gedolim held pre war when they supported zionsim. People like the rizyna rebas , imeri Emes and so many others too large to list envisoned the DL model.

    in reply to: A lot of DL Bashing Charedim Lately #2334656
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @pure yiddishkeit,

    Ill start with syaing that your comment is just from a modern day brainwashing’s of whityewashing facts They never taught you the truth because that would change your narritve.
    Chafetz chaim: People are very quick to make a stink of one comment that the chafetz chaim said to one person pirvately. And the turth is he didn’t hold of everything R kook did. But FACTS are he walked out of a convetnion in front of hundreds of people for the kovod of R Kook. This is undisputable vs your one on one comment. It was a public display. Furthermore, R Kook shever helped write the chafetz chaim’s sefer (I believe the one about being drafted and fighting). After the Aderes was nifter he asked R kook to help. Thats a fact.

    Birska Rav didn’t even have a yeshiva and had maybe 100 talmidum. Stamar compared to aguda was tiny. Sorry the list of gedolim and followers on the other side was tiny compared to what Stamar had. That’s simply a fact.

    Now some of those you list who “agreed” are nonsense. The skulner never did such a thing and nevr tooka stand. Furthermore, let me tell you something aboiut the skulner reba’s rebbe. Do you knwo he was a talmud of the Shtfeneshta reba? Ypu probably neve rheard of him because your narrow world only the kaniom were gedolim. But the shtefenshta reba had a picture of Herzel in his study. Again public knoweldge. Everyone knows that the skulner’s rebbe was a proud Zionist. In fact all Rizyhna rebas were proud zionists.

    Now bobov : R shlomola disn’t mix in nor get involved in this.

    Most of the other gedolim listed were on the badatz so yes they were against zionsim too. Thats true.
    Chazan ish was mixed becuase he was pro voting.
    The puppa, Tosha reba and vzhnitza are more modern day rabbonim and don’t count as part of this machlokos.

    To the commenter about Punivtcha rav and hallel. Firstly I believe on the first year he said. Secondly, The punvitcha rav was a bit of a politican who said things at all times. But if you look at him in his entity you’ll see he was pro zionsim. in 1952 by the big hanchas even hapinah of the Punvitch grounds he had all the non frum left wing cehvra haknest there some were star speakers. The eidah wrote patchkeviln and hung sings all opver the streets of meah shearim against the Punvitcha. The land of the yeshiva is from his best friend back in telz or the breakoff who became frie and an influential knesset member. So yes he was a zionist.

    Now here is the thing. We all agree that- “secularism” is bad. And so once the war ended and the state of israel was formed, the opposition and fights became more about how to we deal with secularism trying to be imposed on our torah in the modern day. The question was no longer should there be a state but rather how do we fight secularism? And so in that sense it became more popular and sensible to adopt the Satmar reba shita to oppose a “secular” govt. But in as much as the actual idea of having a state before moshiach and zionsim itself, its not so clear. And you may have a list of what i count 10 or so gedolim. (ike is aid the post 1960 gedolim don’t count) however, i can list 50 that said a state is is the torah way (Not a secular one but yes a state)

    in reply to: Why Jews are Quitting the Democratic Party #2334123
    Chaim87
    Participant

    I think we need to be careful about this rhetoric. We need to stay independent vs becoming loyal to one party. Not everything the republican’s do are so great either for frum jews. Take an extreme example where a Ron Paul isolationist takes charge and advocates not supporting Israel. Or for example take the neo Nazis. Now lets focus on other issues pertaining to frum jews in the USA. Is anti immigration so great for us? We like to say yes. But our community benefits alot from immigrants probably more than others without getting into details. We need them here. Another example, sure Biden is guilty for Inflation but Trump isn’t innocent either. Trump increased the deficit by $3T before covid (some via tax cuts without cutting govt spending). Trump overspent during covid with PPP and so much unemployment. Sure it was needed but it just feels like it was to sloppy. Other countries didn’t do that. Trump’s vulgar langauge, demeanor and moral values are far worse than other politcans and we can’t ignore that either.

    That all being said Israel is our #1 issue. Harris already tied israel’s hand in rafah and weapons’ embargos with her silly innocent Palestinian civilians argument. And the embracement of a two state solution is all very dangerous now. This is why yes das torah said vote Trump. israel is our #1 issue. But lets not get stuck in the Trump kool-aid and say everything of the other side is horrible. If Fetterman ran instead of Harris its very possible he’d be the best candidate.

    Then there are local elections. Murphy in NJ for example, worked with us during covid (contrast that to Cuomo) and fought off threats like ruse-up ocean county. And then there are progarms that yingerlit need where democrates are more gracious although lately school vouchers are a repubcoan thing.

    I know we all quote R Miller who was against voting for democrat’s. But others including R Moshe zl held to vote for democrat’s at times. We know Stamar & Skver are often democrat too. Its wiser if we remain issue based and independent based on the issue at hand. Yes this time trump was the right vote. But don’t buy into the cult.

    in reply to: A lot of DL Bashing Charedim Lately #2333502
    Chaim87
    Participant

    Many gedolim of hundred years ago were definitely more open toward DL ideals if not at least tolerant. It’s well known that during the 1924 kenisah gedolah someone got up and spoke again R Kook zl. The chafetz Chaim
    was present and walked out on the speaker refusing to return to the convention for the rest of the days. R Kook was also close to R isser zalman, R tzvi pesach frank and of course the Nazir. His talmidim were R elishayv and R shloma zalman.
    We also had many rizhna rebas who were mizrachi and even fehred tish yom hatzmut.
    Imeri emes also held of R kook . Many Gera chasdim used to fight in the army.
    Punvitcha Rav raised the fiag on Yom hatzmut and said hallel
    Generally , gedolim were more tolerant or a bit Zionistic themselves. Yes there was the minchas eluzer and the Satmar Rebs and briska Rav were very holy and anti DL. But they weren’t the mainstream of klal Yisroel

    in reply to: accounting profession #2333352
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @Dr. Pepper,
    The points you make are fair pointers but I think the question is about becoming an accountant today vs years ago. Here is my professional opinion as someone who debated this issue years ago and chose not to be an accountant rather another profession.
    1) Those 150 credits are easier today than ever Touro college years ago. PCS does this in 18 months.
    2) The idea that with hard work in other professions you can just grow and get promoted has shifted a lot in corporate. That used to be the case. Nowadays, there are far fewer promotions and hard work won’t get you to VP. You need to be politically savvy and polished which is hard for a frum Jew. Corporations got more nimble and keep a lot more at mid level roles.
    3) The frum world of business has gotten so large that it’s built it own eco system of commerce. While years ago only a few select accountants left corporate for CFO, nowadays the demand for a competent worker is much higher. Opportunity in frum communities where you need not travel are ample and pay is decent.
    Bottom line, for the average frum yeshiva guy accounting is just the most smoothest path albeit it has struggles and bumps. In todays days where everyone is looking to just be rich till they fall on their face, accountants is advised

    in reply to: One more cheeseburger, and we have J.D.Vance as president #2332692
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @yechiell,
    I always found it kind of odd and almost amusing that people think Trump is old and weak like Biden. They said things like he rambles and kvetches a lot as proof. The same is true about his weight when people say he is weak because he is fat. To me it’s like so absurd. Trump was just as incoherent and crazy in 2016 or 2020 as now. Moreover, if you see the energy he has and the amount of rallies he conducted. Or his schpiel like the garbage truck and McDonalds, it’s just so ridiculous to call that low energy. Harris who is 20 years younger doesn’t have that kind of energy and sass. These are funny memes and lines but it’s shallow and just false.

    Here is another odd thing. Trump does have so much baggage that why make an issue over what’s not baggage. I mean he’s the guy is a corrupt con non tznuis narcissist. And the list goes on. Why make fun of this?
    Lastly, despite my list of bad Trump traits, I’ll admit the is still my mad dog because as a frum Jew I want him to box in Iran and help Israel. And he should be yours too

    in reply to: Trump’s presidency #2332655
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @Neville Chaimberlin Lo Mes,
    1) As I told you lockdowns depend on context. How long the lockdown? At what point in time? Saving lives is vital to especially when the fire is out of control. Conservatives agree on that. It isn’t tyrnany at that point in time when everything is so overwhelmed and people were dying that quickly. Thats basisc common sense. Yes a half year in what Cuomo did is tyrrany. Thats a very different time.
    2) I agree Trump did nothing on the border wall. On many issues the man is hot air fluff.
    3) You are dead wrong on the shuls. By labeling them essential NYC was required to allow them to open. They did open at that point. But the limit was only ten people social distanced. They sent inspectors to check on it. But they were forced to reopen. That is a known fact. (Of course when it comes to Trump the never Trump cult is so brainwashed that they distort facts).
    4) Trump was indeed not a conservative. He had no fiscal discipline and spent like a drunken sailor. The idea of tarriffs is also not conservative. Both I think wreck the economy. He didn’t cut a single program either. He ran the govt like his slot machines in AC.
    5) The reason I like trump isn’t because he is a conservative. Those are my dislikes. I like Trump because of foriegn policy and Israel especially. Only someone who drinks the never Trump kool aid can’t see that he is good on that end. That doesn’t make him all good. In my opnion, the never trump frum jews can’t admit that Trump wins resoundingly on this issue. Because they know after Oct 7 this is the most pressing issue. That would mean they can’t be a never Trumper. They can’t bring themselves to say that. I on the other hand will tell you, Trump is not good on mnay issues other than israel and yes how he handled Covidwith reagrds to vaccines, fasttracking ventitlators and covid tests and yes lockdowns But I am leaving out his wreckless covid spending. where he gets an F for wasteful PPP.

    But to repeat no question he is better for Israel

    in reply to: Trump’s presidency #2332519
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @Participant
    I could be wrong. But I think in the beginning first few months he wasn’t as go hung on getting rid of the lockdowns. Yet he pretty much enacted shuls are essential in may 2020 already. Once the summer came and things slowed dwon a bit thats when he started to be more anti lockdown. That actaully makes sense. I think the first lockdown of April 2020 was necessary. Yes maybe we could have ended it by lag bomer vs shavous. But initially you need a lock down to figure things out. Don’t forget lockdowns most definitely slow the spread since it only spreads by social interacting. The issue with a lockdown is that its a draconian measure. Generally humans need to socially interact for a whole slew of reasons. (Thats why jail is so cruel). After a certain amount of time you just can’t continuously lock people up. And so my point is for the first month or two it was vital. But after that it was uncalled for. And this is what I was referring to.

    in reply to: Trump’s presidency #2331861
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @Neville Chaimberlin Lo Mes,
    1) Trump peacemaking firstly opened business opportunities. Secondly, the accords I believe offered Israel greater legitmacy in this war. lastly, it kept the Sunni Arabs out of the fight even though Hamas is sunni not shite. Ideally Saudi Arabia and the UAE should be with hamas. So it did alot
    2) Moving the embassy: again yes its just a building but it adds legitimacy to israel. Furthermore, it buries the arab claim that Israel is an occuiper, after all the embassy says otherwise. its a big statement and no other president agreed to move that embassy for a reason.
    3) Iran deal: Well the do nothing to stop it isn’t the point. But firstly he did do something by imposing more sanctions via ripping up the deal. That’s not nothing. Secondly, it takes time to fully get tough on Iran. Don’t forget killing Soleimani was also something. And if you think he will get lighter on Iran, you have another thing coming. Iran was caught trying to plot an assassination attempt on Trump. Even if just a rumor Trump takes revenge on his enmies. Just ask the Democrat’s how scared they are of that. Trump despite his love for Putin ain’t gonna let him pump Iran. They want Trump dead.
    4) Re shuls during Covid:Oh yes such a thing happened. Go research it., trump decalred houses of worship are essential. That means that accoridng to law you can’t shut down a shul. The govt decides whats essential and essential services must remain open. And Guess what I am one of those that believe lockdowns at least early on were important. So yes Trump cared about our safety and did not want to stop lockdowns. It wasn’t safe to have everything open that early on (I think later on once vaccines were out, it was another story). Nevertheless the balance that our shuls are “essential was a virtue.

    Two more closing points: Trump again is appointing pro Israel people both to the UN and other positions. Jared still has trumps ear on the middle east.
    And my final point, I think its dishonest on your part and distruthful to not see how Trump is good for jews. It stems form your anti trump narrow close minded view. Its as bad as the lemmelach that think trump is all good. Trump is horrible for the economy and as frum jews lets not kid ourself immigration is a good thing. We all have goytas and immgrants helping us all over. We need to stop being fools and buying into all trump’s lukshein. neverthless that doesn’t change the fact that for jews Trump is better. (Harris/ Biden just forced israel to send humanitarian aid to gaza). You need to stop denying the facts just because you hate trump.

    in reply to: You wanted an insane dictator? You got him! #2330917
    Chaim87
    Participant

    Insane but good for jews and israel! thats all you need to care about

    in reply to: Trump’s presidency #2330916
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @Neville Chaimberlin Lo Mes,

    So I am one of these people that neither buy into the Trump cult nor buy against everything Trump.
    Here is the one issue you fail to address. How good he was for frum jews. And yes Israel but even more than that. Here is the list:
    1) Abraham accords
    2) Ripping up the Iran deal (you can argue about its virtues but the democratically elected leader of Israel wanted that)
    3) Moved the embassy
    4) Killed Soleimani
    For frum jews in general
    5) Freed Rubashkin and prison reform
    6) during covid passed a law for houses of worship
    7) more funding to private schools

    There are more but thats a start. At the same time, he caused inflation and won’t decrease gas prices now . he will increase inflation and won’t uild that stupid wall. to your point his endless unpemployement and PPP money caused inflation. But depsite his failures we needed him for gaza. Biden’s back and forth wasn’t good. The delay and second guessing before we went into Rafah. The consistent insistence of humanitarian aid that enriches hamas. the threat not to supply weapons. Its time to get the kid gloves off and stop falling for Hamas charades about innocent civillans. They played Biden/ harris too much. You can’t play trump like that. So yes there is plenty bad but for us the good is much better

    in reply to: Whats a minyan factory? #2328487
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @ujm Whats out of town? Baltimore has Eichenstiens, Chicago & Cleveland I believe have their own too.

    in reply to: please vote who you thinks gunnu win the election #2328145
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @anchuldiks
    538 has Trump at 52% chance of winning

    in reply to: Trump “wealth” #2328144
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @huju
    Fair post. But then don’t complain that he doesn’t pay taxes. You see isn’t really wealthy.. And don’t say he is a an elitist billionare. he can’t pay his bills.

    in reply to: Whats a minyan factory? #2328143
    Chaim87
    Participant

    As I noted in my above comment, I suspect many here are being cynical. In reality minyan factories are one of the holiest most chashuva shuls around. They are selfless people who just give and give to other jews no matter who they are. And anyone who tries to open one up for money or fame quikcly shuts it down. Its not a money maker and its a huge undertaking. And there is a need for more of them.

    in reply to: please vote who you thinks gunnu win the election #2327890
    Chaim87
    Participant

    Close call but bottom line, I think Trump. My reason is that Trump’s strength is in his rallies. He lost 2020 bec he couldn’t hold rallies.

    in reply to: Whats a minyan factory? #2327784
    Chaim87
    Participant

    I like to describe a minyan factory as a shul that’s a factory of endless chesed. A shul where there is no “I” rather its us. They are generally places that care about jews from all walks of life. Take the Shomer Shabbos shul, it not only has minyanim for the kehila when its needed but it also caters to all different minhagim. There are minyanim for rabbani tam accoding to many shitas, krias hatorah at 4PM for those that couldn’t hear it earlier, minyan ethlim thursady night, minyan for Bhab, YM kotton for those and for those not fasting. Its doesn’t have signs disinviting people who aren’t dressed a ceratin way. All are welcome. And this why there is also a free soup kitchen with lots of food, collections for the poor of all walks of life, rides to all over the world for those that need etc. Basically, its what being real chasdish means as the Besht wanted. A place that cares and welcomes all jews from all walks of life. (schiners is similar). “minyan factories” are one of the most holiest special places around.

    in reply to: Trump Good for Jews? Consider these worrying trends #2324724
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @crazykanoiy

    First of all this is funny that your anti trump ventting coming from that same anti Zionist ideology that you espouse. It doesn’t smell right.
    I can upshlieg everyone of your arguments but time is limited. Here is the key point, at the end of the day you and I know Trump hates muslims more than jews. Its obvious. He also has his own party all very very pro Israel and he can’t just turn on his base who he loves. He was also president for 4 years already and we see how good he was. he talks alot, says stupid things, is childish etc. Furthermore, the greatest threat to israel now and the one that can kind of be solved fairly easy is Hamas. Hamas is the one that has the hostages and who commited Oct 7. Iran isn’t easy to get rid of and less direct. Even hezbollah sure they can attack but its less direct. I also think Hezbollah and Iran are less sucidal and are worried about their own country somewhat. Hezbollah can’t have Lebanon look like Gaza. Hamas is the most evil and greatest direct threat. As far as Hamas is concerned, kamala has pity on Palestinians which is what sinwar wants. Trump couldn’t give a hoot about plaestinains. Yes one mayor supported him simply out of anger because Harris is not fully on his side. But its negligble. We all know trump is the leader of muslums bans and Islamophobia . I am a fan of Islamaphobia as I think all jews should be. Because Islam is scary.

    in reply to: Question for those who don’t think Charedim should join the IDF #2324713
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @somejewiknow: HARAV Kook to you. He always held the same shita and never went off the derech. You bring a proof from one gadol R Elchanon and one alleged line which is not clear iof he said it or not. I am not the liar rather you are because you can’t fathom that there are mnay ways to torah.. You are stuck in a cult. We know the holy chaftez chaim held of him.

    No it not a lie that R Isser Zalman Meltzer, & R Tzvi pesach Frank and the Nazir were all colse to him.
    No it not a lie that R shlomia zalman and R Elyshaiv learned by him. Would they learn by a “rasha”?

    Re Zionsim as a whole, we have eyewitness testmiony from people who saw the Rizyna rebas celebrate Yom hatzmut. I heared from an eyewitness who heard R sharga fevil mendleovitch make a bracha on the medina. We all know punvitch raised the flag and said hallel.

    You refuse to face the truth when its staring at you in the face. Someone who denies facts, I can’t debate. But I will continue to call you out as being untruthful

    in reply to: accounting profession #2324373
    Chaim87
    Participant

    This is a very loaded question. It all depends on so many variables.
    1) if you compare it to other professional “ corporate” like setting then the pay is really the same. It’s not any worse than an actuary, data scientist, IT, coder, and in some cases even a lawyer . Pay is the same.
    2) Following up on #1, assuming you want to be a professional, are you the type that wants to work in a secular environment like an actuary or data scientist? Or do you prefer a “frum” setting ? If the later than accounting is the best profession. There are by far the most “frum” jobs.
    3) following up on #2, because there are lots of frum opportunities you aren’t just stuck in a corporate setting. For other professions you’ll get capped at 150k-200k . (Although that comes with a nice 401k) In frum settings you can become a CFO or partial owner of a company where you’ll earn more .
    4) Just beware that for a while you will struggle . You’ll earn sometimes just 60k when you start, may have to schlep into the city, loose programs and work long hours . It takes time to get to 150k even.
    5) Lately there are people in other fields whether Amazon managers/ healthcare industry that do better initially but the jury is out there how high they can go and if this self created frum eco system can stick.
    6) To peoples point that you need 150 credits, that’s a joke. You go to pcs and can get that in 18 months . Re the CPA it beats actuary exams or the bar.

    in reply to: Question for those who don’t think Charedim should join the IDF #2324346
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @somejewiknow.

    R Aron Lieb Z’l was very- supportive of nachal charedi. No its not an avoda zara. Noone is saying it kodesh kodshim. But you need to stop belittling other jews who you disagree with. When you hear R Asher Weiss speak about shailas he gets from some of these IDF soilders there is no way you can say that they are all just looking to throw off the yoke and shmad. Listen to the question from the wounded soilder missing hands who wants top put on teflin. Go look at soldiers making a syuim in gaza or daveing with a bren like you & I never davened. Its easy to be a kanoi but the facts are that there are mnay ehrlicah soldiers. And yes maybe some people do belong there if they7 can’t learn. Even if you disagree , how do you hvae the chutzpah to say those that do join or shektazim? Its an outright lie and mitzai shem ra.

    in reply to: Question for those who don’t think Charedim should join the IDF #2323780
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @somejewiknow
    i am holding myself back the day before yom kippur from shaming or name calling. But there are many gedolim that held of zionism and a jewish state. The bigger issue was “secularism” and the idea that one can throw off the torah. Its somehwat combined with zionism but not necessaily and the same is true for neologs or anyone that lessens yiddishkiet. The idea of a jewish state though was held by mnay gedlom. Lets start with the list.
    1) R kook was not a fringe gadol. He was totally mainstream. the Chafetz chaim walked out of the convention in 1924 when R Kook was shamed and refsued to come back. R Kook also helped him proof read his own sefarim after R Kook shver was nifter. I know you’ll find some one line zinger where the chafetz chaim was upset at R Kook. Overall he held him in high esteem . The Alfandri zl who was a big mekubal in Yerushlaim said that the reaon the chafetz chaim didn’t make it to EY was because he would have made sholom between R Kook and R sonnenfeld. Had that happened moshaich would have come. This is a FACT and not an opinion. Aside for the C Chaim, R Isser Zalman, R Tzvi pesach Frank and many others held of R kook. Its no secret that R Elyashiv and R shloma zalamn learned by him. Even R Sonnenfeld while putting him in cherem , also sat next to him and I heard that from eyewitnesses who said both attended his parents chasna and were talking to each other. So for you to call him “kook” is a chutzpah and you need to teshiva before YK.
    2) All the Ryzhna rebas held of a medina. The sadygura said hallel yom hatzmut. The shtefensht who was the rebbe of the ribnitza and skulna rebbe zl has a pic of Hertzel on his wall.
    3) the punvitcha rav had all ofn them by the even hapina of the yeshiva, said haellel and raised the flag. R lazer yudel also did
    4) R sharga fevel mendlevoitch ZL made bracha when the Medina was allowed to formed.

    Zionism according to many is yes judaism. We agree that secularism isn’t

    Chaim87
    Participant

    @crazykanoiy
    Re Afghanistan or the Kurdish those are not really Israel and jewish issues. I don’t think everything you quote is accurate but Ill leave that aside for now.\

    Lets discuss Iran, Trump did NOT allow Iran to enrich uriname That’s completely false and you know it. Trump backed out of the Iran deal. The Iran deal was a bad deal that didn’t really stop Iran. Iran was lying and building it anyhow. You forgot Bibi’s map displayed at the UN showing where Iran was building it, in areas that they didn’t let inspectors in. Trump called their bluff. Not that further proof is needed, but you see that Bibi and the Israeli intelligence didn’t like the deal. if it was truly such a great deal why did Israel hate it? The obvious is that it was a bluff. Let me remind you also that trump has the guts to assassinat a top Iranian general Solemani.. Trump has the guts to stand up to Iran.

    Calling an enemy smart whether its Putin or Hezbollah doesn’t diminish anything. It just means beware of the enemy. I think the Nazis YMS were very smart too. Why does that matter or make them less evil? (Incidentally Hezbollah ain’t too smart and Hamas with “Yamus” Sinwar YMS is probably the brightest of the bunch).

    Re is bashing Bibi, yes trump gets crazy like that but at the end of the day his policies are very clear. And his entire party is so pro Israel. trump loves making his base happy. (He likes Ivanaka too). Its insane to call a guy who took the time to go to the reba or reaches out so much to frum jews as an anti semite. Lamsa Harris doesn’t do those stuff. I mean his love for jews is pretty obvious.

    I get that you are blinded by Trump hate. And just to be clear so that you don’t think I buy into the “cult” as you call it. Trump has alot of faults. he is no messiah. For starters , he is bad for the economy, spends too much, causes inflation. China embargos are a bad idea. I think the noise about Immigration is all just fear and blown up out of proportion. The man is corrupt through and through. A zona, con man, weird creep are all true about him. Nevertheless, to deny the fact that he is better for Jews in these crazy times is just so false on so many levels. Its almost as if there is a certain hate trump cult that blinds you into not seeing the truth either.

    in reply to: My Letter to Sarah Schneirer about School Trauma from the Matzav Inbox: #2312628
    Chaim87
    Participant

    @Gadolhadorah
    We’d like to think that you are correct. But unfortunately, this isn’t always the case especially for “in-town” schools. Its often the case that image and money play a role. Schools will often ignore the less “shtulzy” simple family even if just as ehrlich. Meanwhile they may have rules but if you have money they will take you even if you don’t follow the rules. This all being said, it seems like the letter writer’s daughter was in school already and got thrown out because pf rules. At that point its often because you don’t follow the rules. But even there sometimes schools are quick to accuse a child withoiut taking the proper caution to research.

    in reply to: Terrorists Murdered Hostages Shortly Before They Were Located #2312612
    Chaim87
    Participant

    There are so many variables that complicate this discussion.

    Firstly, what is the after game? I get it that the goal is lets say to stay in Gaza for another year or two. But there will be a time just like Lebanon when we tends will leave. Who controls the place then? And who says they will be better? Will it be a ” new group” who pretends to be peaceful (maybe the PA) and that will force Israel to allow more freedom but then when it turns around CVS they are even worse? Or keeping Hamas there but having a good excuse to box them in more is perhaps the option which may be the ceasefire option?
    Secondly, the prisoner exchange. We like to say this was all Sinwar YMS brains. But was it also not Deif and mashal YMS?, Sure letting out prisioners can result in senior experienced operatives to turn around and kill us. But in reality there are just so many rutheless palestianins drinking the jihad kool-aid that if it’s not these animals its them.
    Of course meanwhile hostages are suffering a holocaust and there is no viable way to free them by force rather CVS Hamas will kill them if we get to close
    And what if we make a deal and go back in after our fellow brothers come home? The world will scream and we won’t be able to grab all the freed prisoners that have blood on their hands but we can get a nice amount.
    I am not suggesting that this approach of standing frim with no ceasefire is wrong. From a torah perspective we have the mahram M rutenberg. Although R Michoel Ber Z’l did negotiate with nazis. I heard R Asher Weiss couldn’t pasken either way when asked. Ultimately I just don’t think its a simple as everyone makes it

Viewing 50 posts - 51 through 100 (of 214 total)